Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 寵物非預期性死亡對飼養家庭之影響
A study on the Influence of family who faces the unexpected death of pets作者 彭韋銜
Pang, Wei-Hean貢獻者 陳婉真
彭韋銜
Pang, Wei-Hean關鍵詞 失落
家庭
寵物
非預期性死亡
grief
family
pet
unexpected death日期 2022 上傳時間 1-Aug-2022 18:55:25 (UTC+8) 摘要 家庭結構隨著時代的變遷已發生變化，寵物從過去工具性功能轉變成情感性功能，擔任飼主情感依附與關係連接之角色。因此寵物逝世對個體的影響象徵著關係的斷裂，引發失落現象。過往研究在喪寵議題上較聚焦於個體的影響與悲傷歷程處理，但研究已指出寵物已逐漸發展成為本土家庭結構的一員，因此在探索喪寵之失落情感時，不僅是發生在飼主個人身上，也需要留意整體家庭之影響。本研究透過訪談的方式，邀請曾經歷寵物非預期性死亡之家庭一員回溯家庭在面臨喪寵歷程時的感受與想法，希望藉由訪談分析了解飼養家庭在處理此共同喪寵經驗時的助力與阻力相關因子。本研究結果如下:一、飼養寵物於家庭互動所帶來的影響本研究結果整理正向影響包含建立話題連結家人關係、使孩子放心父母有人陪伴減少顧慮、緩解父母對孩子的過度注意力、緩和家庭成員間的關係。負向影響則有飼養寵物使成員在環境整潔度上產生衝突、寵物勾起家庭成員的激烈情緒，波及其他成員、子女與寵物的爭風吃醋、飼養觀念落差大，成員互動間產生摩擦。二、寵物離世後飼養家庭的反應狀況寵物離世後，家庭成員會表現出失落，如哭泣、自責、不捨等，猶如喪親之反應。家庭互動亦受喪寵後的氣氛低落影響，減少了接觸。彼此的失落情緒皆停留在自身身上，較少與其他家人有流動之情緒互動，並且家庭成員也會避開寵物相關話題。寵物的離世也讓家庭成員體會到家人的重要性，更在意身邊的家人，引起正向的漣漪。三、影響家人是否能共同經歷寵物離世的相關因子助力因子主要表現於支持性與正向力量。支持性源自於家庭間的情緒正向流動，以正向眼光看待寵物死亡事件則帶來正向力量。阻力因子則是寵物非預期性死亡造成的衝擊較大與飼養家庭間的情緒界線阻礙了家庭共同處理該悲傷歷程的可能性。最後，依據本研究之結果，對實務工作處理喪寵之飼主與家庭議題，以及未來研究提出建議供參考。
Over the years, the family structure has changed considerably, so is the role of pets in families. Being an emotional attachment as well as connection between family members, discussions of the importance of pets in the families have now shifted from its instrumental function to its emotional function. Therefore, the death of a pet signifies relationship ruptures and triggers grief and loss. Previous studies have focused more on the impacts of death of pets on individuals and the grieving process. However, as researches have pointed out that pets have gradually been deemed as family members in the family structure in Taiwan, it is important to look beyond affected individuals when discussing bereavement and look into the impacts it has on family as a whole.In this research, one member of each family who has experienced unanticipated death of a pet is invited to review the family`s feelings and thoughts when going through the process of bereavement, in hopes of identifying support and resistance factors that arise when the family is adapting to the mutual experience of pet loss through qualitative interview analysis.The results of this study are as follows:I. The influence of pet ownership on family interactionsThe positive effects of pet ownership include establishing family relationship through mutual topics related to pets, assuring grown children that their parents are well accompanied by pets and therefore reducing concerns of aging parents’ loneliness, directing parents` excessive attention from their children by keeping them occupied with pet-raising, and easing tense relationships between family members. The negative effects include conflicts arise from the cleanliness of environment, family member get upsets over things related to pets and eventually vent his or her anger on other innocent family members, children’s jealousy with the pets, and arguments over different breeding concepts between family members.II. The reaction of the family after the pet`s deathAfter the pet died, family members displayed grief reactions, such as crying, self-blame, reluctance, etc, which are also considered as the reaction of bereavement. Family interactions were also affected by the depressed family atmosphere after the bereavement and family members kept distance with one another. There were less emotional interactions between family members and pet-related topics were avoided during conversations. The death of the pet also brought positive effect, such as highlighting the importance of family to family members and reminding them to care for the family members around them.III. Factors that determine whether a family is capable of coping with loss of a pet as a wholePositive factors that allow a family to cope with loss of a pet as a whole include supportive and positive behaviours, such as positive flow of emotion in the family and positive mindset towards pet’s death, which bring positive energy to the family. The negative factors are related to the overwhelming impact brought by the unintended death of the pet, the emotional boundaries between family members which hinder the possibility of the family working together along the grief journey.Lastly, based on the results of this study, suggestions are made for practical work on the issue of bereaved owners and families, as well as future research.參考文獻 一、中文部分中華民國內政部統計月報。現住人口出生、死亡、結婚、離婚登記。民國110年10月10日，取自https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/400/relfile/0/4413/79c158fd-d51f-4061-b24b-fbcdb0fb92d9/month/month.html尹莘玲、王崇儀、陳耀昌、方中民（2009）。台灣之突然非預期性死亡研究。台灣法學醫誌，1（2），43-58。江中信（2002）。人際傳播學：人際溝通與關係。風雲論壇，臺北市，臺灣。江原（2015）。從依戀理論探討人與同伴動物的關係（未出版之博士論文）。世新大學。何長珠（2008）。悲傷影響因素之初探。生死學研究，7，139-182。李玉嬋（2009）。如何協助車禍喪生者親屬～親人驟逝的悲傷輔導。諮商與輔導，277，51-58。李凱恩（2012）。寵物對人類健康所帶來的正面影響—兼論寵物飼養的道德爭議。應用倫理評論，52，203-218。李鴻昌（2007）。“寵物≠寵物”-家庭休閒與寵物的新共生關係（未出版之博士論文）。國立台灣體育學院。李鴻昌、陳渝苓（2009）。新休閒夥伴： 寵物家人的概念建構與休閒互動之質化分析。運動休閒餐旅研究，4（3），114-129。林秋燕（2003）。失戀歷程及復原力展現之分析研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。林耀盛（2005）。說是一物即不中：從倫理性轉向療癒觀點反思震災存活者的悲悼歷程。本土心理學研究，23，259-317。林耀盛、吳英璋（2004）。雙重變奏曲：探究「九二一」地震「失親家毀」受創者之心理經驗現象。中華心理衛生學刊，17（2），1-41。洪琬婷（2013）。失去天平的另一端——飼主面對寵物離世之悲傷失落歷程研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立暨南國際大學。胡幼慧（2014）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（增訂二版）。巨流。袁翠苹（2007）。寵物似如親-歷經寵物死亡之生活經驗探究（未出版之博士論文）。國立嘉義大學。高舒（2018）。「喪親」與「家」的現象召喚及流變關係探究：癌症喪親主題視域（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學。高淑清（2008）。質性研究的18堂課-首航初探之旅。麗文文化。張力、吳婉綺、林翠蓉（2014）。依附關係、生活壓力、休閒效益與寵物飼養行為之關聯性研究。績效與策略研究，11（2），19-44。產業情報研究所。寵物消費者調查。民110年10月24日，取自https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=576許鶴齡（2010）。論禮儀師之助人角色與服務倫理。新世紀宗教研究，8（3），95-124。陳向明（2002）。教師如何作質的研究。紅葉文化。陳亭君、林耀盛、許文耀（2010）。重大創傷事件的個人意義化歷程：建構與轉化。高雄行為科學學刊，2，61-80。陳建澄（2013）。寵物死亡之哀傷輔導。諮商與輔導，334，42-25。陳昱霖（2021）。飼主情感依附與同伴動物命名之關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北護理健康大學。曾素梅（2007）。悲傷輔導的處理歷程與技巧－以心理劇之死亡議題為例。諮商與輔導，262，40-43。游智能（2004）。民宿作為家意義的另類生產途徑——以蘭陽地區民宿家庭為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣大學。黃淑清、修慧蘭（2003）。失落之探討:以青少年期父母親過世的成年人為例。應用心理研究月刊，20，217-238。萬文隆（2004）。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育，37（4），17-23。葉何賢文（2003）。悲傷調適歷程及生命意義展現之研究－以喪子（女）父母為例（未出版之博士論文）。南華大學。臺北市動物保護處。臺北市犬貓總數趨勢表（1999年～2019年）。民國110年10月10日，取自https://www.tcapo.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=36B8466FA58F4688&sms=2BAC54591CA8B41A&s=B80854FC6BE9F493劉子綺（2007）。成人飼主面對寵物死亡的心理調適與歷程之研究（未出版之博士論文）。南華大學。蔡佩真（2009）。台灣喪親家庭關係之變化與探究。生死學研究，10，159-198。鄧琼嫈（2008）。成年女性飼主經歷寵物犬死亡之悲傷調適歷程研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。謝昀庭（2020）。從結構取向家族治療探討寵物飼養對家庭動力之影響——以自家飼養經驗為例。諮商與輔導，411，28-32。簡妤儒（2002）。寵物商品化與價值變遷：分析1950年代後犬市場的形成與變遷（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣大學。二、英文部分Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.Bowlby, J. & Parkes, C. M. (1970). Separation and loss. In E. J. Anthony & C. Koupernik (Eds.), The child and his family: The international yearbook of child psychiatry and allied profession (pp. 197-216). Wiley.Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Attachment (2nd ed.). Basic Books.Brennan, M. (2008). Mourning and disaster: Finding meaning in the mourning for Hillsborough and Diana. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Cook, A. S., & Oltjenbruns, K. A. (1989). Dying and grieving: Lifespan and family perspectives. Harcourt College Publishers.de Guzman, A. B., Cucueco, D. S., Cuenco, I. B. V., Cunanan, N. G. C., Dabandan, R. T., & Dacanay, E. J. E. (2009). Petmanship: Understanding elderly Filipinos` self-perceived health and self-esteem captured from their lived experiences with pet companions. Educational Gerontology, 35, 963-989.Gage, M. G., & Holcomb, R. (1991). Couples` perception of stressfulness of death of the family pet. Family Relations, 40(1), 103-105.Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (Rev. ed.). Routledge.Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362.Humphrey, G. M., & Zimpfer, D. G. (2008). Counselling for grief and bereavement (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.James, J. W., & Friedman, R. (2017). The grief recovery handbook: The action program for moving beyond death, divorce, and other losses including health, career and faith (20th ed.). William Morrow Paperbacks.Kastenbaum, R., & Moreman, C. M. (2018). Death, society, and human experience (12th ed.). Routledge.Kavanaugh R. (1973). Facing death. Nash Pub.Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Inc.Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.Neugarten, B. L. (1976). Adaptation and the life cycle. The Counseling Psychologist, 6 (1), 16-20.Seidman, I. E. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.Sloan, M. M. (2012). Controlling anger and happiness at work: An examination of gender differences. Gender, Work, and Organization, 19(4), 370-391.Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (1998). Trauma and grief: A comparative analysis. In J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on loss: A sourcebook (pp.81-95). Routledge.Worden, J. W. (2018). Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner (5th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.Wrobel, T. A., & Dye, A. L. (2003). Grieving pet death: Normative, gender, and attachment issues. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 47(4), 385-393. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
輔導與諮商碩士學位學程
107172010資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107172010 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳婉真 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 彭韋銜 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Pang, Wei-Hean en_US dc.creator (作者) 彭韋銜 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Pang, Wei-Hean en_US dc.date (日期) 2022 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Aug-2022 18:55:25 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Aug-2022 18:55:25 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Aug-2022 18:55:25 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107172010 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141374 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 輔導與諮商碩士學位學程 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107172010 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 家庭結構隨著時代的變遷已發生變化，寵物從過去工具性功能轉變成情感性功能，擔任飼主情感依附與關係連接之角色。因此寵物逝世對個體的影響象徵著關係的斷裂，引發失落現象。過往研究在喪寵議題上較聚焦於個體的影響與悲傷歷程處理，但研究已指出寵物已逐漸發展成為本土家庭結構的一員，因此在探索喪寵之失落情感時，不僅是發生在飼主個人身上，也需要留意整體家庭之影響。本研究透過訪談的方式，邀請曾經歷寵物非預期性死亡之家庭一員回溯家庭在面臨喪寵歷程時的感受與想法，希望藉由訪談分析了解飼養家庭在處理此共同喪寵經驗時的助力與阻力相關因子。本研究結果如下:一、飼養寵物於家庭互動所帶來的影響本研究結果整理正向影響包含建立話題連結家人關係、使孩子放心父母有人陪伴減少顧慮、緩解父母對孩子的過度注意力、緩和家庭成員間的關係。負向影響則有飼養寵物使成員在環境整潔度上產生衝突、寵物勾起家庭成員的激烈情緒，波及其他成員、子女與寵物的爭風吃醋、飼養觀念落差大，成員互動間產生摩擦。二、寵物離世後飼養家庭的反應狀況寵物離世後，家庭成員會表現出失落，如哭泣、自責、不捨等，猶如喪親之反應。家庭互動亦受喪寵後的氣氛低落影響，減少了接觸。彼此的失落情緒皆停留在自身身上，較少與其他家人有流動之情緒互動，並且家庭成員也會避開寵物相關話題。寵物的離世也讓家庭成員體會到家人的重要性，更在意身邊的家人，引起正向的漣漪。三、影響家人是否能共同經歷寵物離世的相關因子助力因子主要表現於支持性與正向力量。支持性源自於家庭間的情緒正向流動，以正向眼光看待寵物死亡事件則帶來正向力量。阻力因子則是寵物非預期性死亡造成的衝擊較大與飼養家庭間的情緒界線阻礙了家庭共同處理該悲傷歷程的可能性。最後，依據本研究之結果，對實務工作處理喪寵之飼主與家庭議題，以及未來研究提出建議供參考。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Over the years, the family structure has changed considerably, so is the role of pets in families. Being an emotional attachment as well as connection between family members, discussions of the importance of pets in the families have now shifted from its instrumental function to its emotional function. Therefore, the death of a pet signifies relationship ruptures and triggers grief and loss. Previous studies have focused more on the impacts of death of pets on individuals and the grieving process. However, as researches have pointed out that pets have gradually been deemed as family members in the family structure in Taiwan, it is important to look beyond affected individuals when discussing bereavement and look into the impacts it has on family as a whole.In this research, one member of each family who has experienced unanticipated death of a pet is invited to review the family`s feelings and thoughts when going through the process of bereavement, in hopes of identifying support and resistance factors that arise when the family is adapting to the mutual experience of pet loss through qualitative interview analysis.The results of this study are as follows:I. The influence of pet ownership on family interactionsThe positive effects of pet ownership include establishing family relationship through mutual topics related to pets, assuring grown children that their parents are well accompanied by pets and therefore reducing concerns of aging parents’ loneliness, directing parents` excessive attention from their children by keeping them occupied with pet-raising, and easing tense relationships between family members. The negative effects include conflicts arise from the cleanliness of environment, family member get upsets over things related to pets and eventually vent his or her anger on other innocent family members, children’s jealousy with the pets, and arguments over different breeding concepts between family members.II. The reaction of the family after the pet`s deathAfter the pet died, family members displayed grief reactions, such as crying, self-blame, reluctance, etc, which are also considered as the reaction of bereavement. Family interactions were also affected by the depressed family atmosphere after the bereavement and family members kept distance with one another. There were less emotional interactions between family members and pet-related topics were avoided during conversations. The death of the pet also brought positive effect, such as highlighting the importance of family to family members and reminding them to care for the family members around them.III. Factors that determine whether a family is capable of coping with loss of a pet as a wholePositive factors that allow a family to cope with loss of a pet as a whole include supportive and positive behaviours, such as positive flow of emotion in the family and positive mindset towards pet’s death, which bring positive energy to the family. The negative factors are related to the overwhelming impact brought by the unintended death of the pet, the emotional boundaries between family members which hinder the possibility of the family working together along the grief journey.Lastly, based on the results of this study, suggestions are made for practical work on the issue of bereaved owners and families, as well as future research. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與背景 1第二節 研究目的與問題 4第三節 名詞釋義 4第二章 文獻探討 6第一節 寵物與人的關係 6第二節 飼主面對寵物死亡之相關研究 12第三節 寵物非預期性死亡對家庭之影響 20第三章 研究方法 25第一節 研究取向與方法 25第二節 研究參與者 26第三節 研究工具 28第四節 研究程序 29第五節 研究的信實度 34第六節 研究倫理 35第四章 研究結果 37第一節 飼養寵物於家庭互動所帶來的影響 37第二節 寵物離世後飼養家庭的反應狀況 43第三節 飼養家庭是否能共同經歷寵物離世的相關因子 44第五章 討論 58第一節 飼養寵物於家庭互動所帶來的影響 58第二節 寵物離世後飼養家庭的反應狀況 62第三節 飼養家庭是否能共同經歷寵物離世的相關因子 66第六章 結論與建議 70第一節 研究結論 70第二節 研究限制 72第三節 研究建議 72第四節 研究者省思 74參考文獻 76附錄一 研究說明暨邀請函 81附錄二 訪談知後同意書 82附錄三 訪談大綱 83表次表 2-2-1 悲傷反應的症狀 18表3-2-1 受訪者基本資料簡表 27表3-4-1 開放性編碼範例表 31表3-4-2 主軸編碼範例表 31表3-4-3 選擇性編碼範例表 32表3-4-4 研究結果呈現方式範例 33圖次圖2-3-1 喪親家庭類型圖 23 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2007284 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107172010 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 失落 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家庭 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 寵物 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 非預期性死亡 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) grief en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) family en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) pet en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) unexpected death en_US dc.title (題名) 寵物非預期性死亡對飼養家庭之影響 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A study on the Influence of family who faces the unexpected death of pets en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分中華民國內政部統計月報。現住人口出生、死亡、結婚、離婚登記。民國110年10月10日，取自https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/400/relfile/0/4413/79c158fd-d51f-4061-b24b-fbcdb0fb92d9/month/month.html尹莘玲、王崇儀、陳耀昌、方中民（2009）。台灣之突然非預期性死亡研究。台灣法學醫誌，1（2），43-58。江中信（2002）。人際傳播學：人際溝通與關係。風雲論壇，臺北市，臺灣。江原（2015）。從依戀理論探討人與同伴動物的關係（未出版之博士論文）。世新大學。何長珠（2008）。悲傷影響因素之初探。生死學研究，7，139-182。李玉嬋（2009）。如何協助車禍喪生者親屬～親人驟逝的悲傷輔導。諮商與輔導，277，51-58。李凱恩（2012）。寵物對人類健康所帶來的正面影響—兼論寵物飼養的道德爭議。應用倫理評論，52，203-218。李鴻昌（2007）。“寵物≠寵物”-家庭休閒與寵物的新共生關係（未出版之博士論文）。國立台灣體育學院。李鴻昌、陳渝苓（2009）。新休閒夥伴： 寵物家人的概念建構與休閒互動之質化分析。運動休閒餐旅研究，4（3），114-129。林秋燕（2003）。失戀歷程及復原力展現之分析研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。林耀盛（2005）。說是一物即不中：從倫理性轉向療癒觀點反思震災存活者的悲悼歷程。本土心理學研究，23，259-317。林耀盛、吳英璋（2004）。雙重變奏曲：探究「九二一」地震「失親家毀」受創者之心理經驗現象。中華心理衛生學刊，17（2），1-41。洪琬婷（2013）。失去天平的另一端——飼主面對寵物離世之悲傷失落歷程研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立暨南國際大學。胡幼慧（2014）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（增訂二版）。巨流。袁翠苹（2007）。寵物似如親-歷經寵物死亡之生活經驗探究（未出版之博士論文）。國立嘉義大學。高舒（2018）。「喪親」與「家」的現象召喚及流變關係探究：癌症喪親主題視域（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學。高淑清（2008）。質性研究的18堂課-首航初探之旅。麗文文化。張力、吳婉綺、林翠蓉（2014）。依附關係、生活壓力、休閒效益與寵物飼養行為之關聯性研究。績效與策略研究，11（2），19-44。產業情報研究所。寵物消費者調查。民110年10月24日，取自https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=576許鶴齡（2010）。論禮儀師之助人角色與服務倫理。新世紀宗教研究，8（3），95-124。陳向明（2002）。教師如何作質的研究。紅葉文化。陳亭君、林耀盛、許文耀（2010）。重大創傷事件的個人意義化歷程：建構與轉化。高雄行為科學學刊，2，61-80。陳建澄（2013）。寵物死亡之哀傷輔導。諮商與輔導，334，42-25。陳昱霖（2021）。飼主情感依附與同伴動物命名之關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北護理健康大學。曾素梅（2007）。悲傷輔導的處理歷程與技巧－以心理劇之死亡議題為例。諮商與輔導，262，40-43。游智能（2004）。民宿作為家意義的另類生產途徑——以蘭陽地區民宿家庭為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣大學。黃淑清、修慧蘭（2003）。失落之探討:以青少年期父母親過世的成年人為例。應用心理研究月刊，20，217-238。萬文隆（2004）。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育，37（4），17-23。葉何賢文（2003）。悲傷調適歷程及生命意義展現之研究－以喪子（女）父母為例（未出版之博士論文）。南華大學。臺北市動物保護處。臺北市犬貓總數趨勢表（1999年～2019年）。民國110年10月10日，取自https://www.tcapo.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=36B8466FA58F4688&sms=2BAC54591CA8B41A&s=B80854FC6BE9F493劉子綺（2007）。成人飼主面對寵物死亡的心理調適與歷程之研究（未出版之博士論文）。南華大學。蔡佩真（2009）。台灣喪親家庭關係之變化與探究。生死學研究，10，159-198。鄧琼嫈（2008）。成年女性飼主經歷寵物犬死亡之悲傷調適歷程研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。謝昀庭（2020）。從結構取向家族治療探討寵物飼養對家庭動力之影響——以自家飼養經驗為例。諮商與輔導，411，28-32。簡妤儒（2002）。寵物商品化與價值變遷：分析1950年代後犬市場的形成與變遷（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣大學。二、英文部分Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.Bowlby, J. & Parkes, C. M. (1970). Separation and loss. In E. J. Anthony & C. Koupernik (Eds.), The child and his family: The international yearbook of child psychiatry and allied profession (pp. 197-216). Wiley.Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Attachment (2nd ed.). Basic Books.Brennan, M. (2008). Mourning and disaster: Finding meaning in the mourning for Hillsborough and Diana. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Cook, A. S., & Oltjenbruns, K. A. (1989). Dying and grieving: Lifespan and family perspectives. Harcourt College Publishers.de Guzman, A. B., Cucueco, D. S., Cuenco, I. B. V., Cunanan, N. G. C., Dabandan, R. T., & Dacanay, E. J. E. (2009). Petmanship: Understanding elderly Filipinos` self-perceived health and self-esteem captured from their lived experiences with pet companions. Educational Gerontology, 35, 963-989.Gage, M. G., & Holcomb, R. (1991). Couples` perception of stressfulness of death of the family pet. Family Relations, 40(1), 103-105.Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (Rev. ed.). Routledge.Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362.Humphrey, G. M., & Zimpfer, D. G. (2008). Counselling for grief and bereavement (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.James, J. W., & Friedman, R. (2017). The grief recovery handbook: The action program for moving beyond death, divorce, and other losses including health, career and faith (20th ed.). William Morrow Paperbacks.Kastenbaum, R., & Moreman, C. M. (2018). Death, society, and human experience (12th ed.). Routledge.Kavanaugh R. (1973). Facing death. Nash Pub.Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, Inc.Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.Neugarten, B. L. (1976). Adaptation and the life cycle. The Counseling Psychologist, 6 (1), 16-20.Seidman, I. E. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.Sloan, M. M. (2012). Controlling anger and happiness at work: An examination of gender differences. Gender, Work, and Organization, 19(4), 370-391.Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (1998). Trauma and grief: A comparative analysis. In J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on loss: A sourcebook (pp.81-95). Routledge.Worden, J. W. (2018). Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner (5th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.Wrobel, T. A., & Dye, A. L. (2003). Grieving pet death: Normative, gender, and attachment issues. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 47(4), 385-393. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200845 en_US
