Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 合作數位閱讀標註系統輔以情緒主題文本閱讀對於國小學童情緒智能及情緒調節策略之影響研究
Effects of Reading Emotional Texts with the Support of Collaborative Reading Annotation System on Primary School Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Regulation Strategies作者 楊孟晴
Yang, Meng-Ching貢獻者 陳志銘
Chen, Chih-Ming
楊孟晴
Yang, Meng-Ching關鍵詞 合作閱讀標註系統
情緒智能
情緒調節策略
重新評估認知
情緒標籤
社會情緒學習
情緒療癒閱讀
Collaborative reading annotation system
Emotional intelligence
Emotional regulation strategies
Cognitive reappraisal
Affect labeling
Social-emotional learning
emotional healing reading日期 2022 上傳時間 1-Aug-2022 19:05:45 (UTC+8) 摘要 在近幾年的研究中，有越來越多的研究指出情緒智能是能夠被教導而學習的，而選擇適當的文本並搭配對話式閱讀策略，有助於提升學習者的社會情感技能。目前學校教師的情緒主題文本教學，大多以面對面講授式教學與紙本討論為主要的教學模式，不但教學模式比較單調，並且不利於清楚記錄下學習者之間的討論軌跡，而「合作數位閱讀標註系統」可讓學習者在對話式閱讀的過程中，透過搭配設計適當的閱讀標註及回應標註類型與同儕交換對於文本中所傳達的情緒觀點，以利引導學習者發展出不同的提問與回應技巧。如此一來，學習者在學習傾聽他人的想法時，也能更深入思考文本的故事涵義，並且支持學習者在後期的情感發展與學術發展。因此，本研究旨在探討分別採用「合作數位閱讀標註系統」與「傳統紙本」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀的實驗組與控制組學習者，在情緒智能及負向情緒調節方法上的差異。本研究採用準實驗研究法，隨機挑選兩個國小六年級的班級為實驗對象，其中一班隨機分派為以「合作閱讀標註系統」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀的實驗組，另一班則為以「傳統紙本」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀的控制組，兩組學習者均進行為期八週的教學實驗，並控制兩組學習者的教學內容、教學時間與教學者皆相同，以比較兩組學習者在情緒智能及負向情緒調節方法上是否具有顯著的差異，並根據質性訪談內容提出教學建議與未來研究方向。研究結果發現，相較於「傳統紙本輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀」，採用「合作閱讀標註系統」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀，除了能夠有效的提升學習者的社會情緒能力之外，也能提升學習者傾聽與感受他人的情緒，以及對於自身人際關係的滿意度，並且採用「合作閱讀標註系統」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀，亦能有效提升學習者面對負向情緒時，採用辨識情緒脈絡、再評價情緒，以及接受負向感受等負向情緒調節方式。另外，使用「合作閱讀標註系統」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀，能夠有效的減少學習者撰寫出無效的閱讀標註。本研究證明「合作閱讀標註系統」能夠激發學習者產生更高的學習動機，有助於促進高層次的思考與進行高品質的討論互動，因此可有效促進情緒智能及情緒調節策略之學習成效。
In recent years, there have been more and more research to indicate that emotional intelligence can be taught and learned, and that selecting appropriate texts with the support of dialogic reading strategies can help learners improve their social-emotional skills. At present, most teachers in schools use face-to-face lectures and paper-based discussions as the main teaching mode for teaching emotional theme texts, which is not only monotonous but also not conducive to clearly recording the discussion processes among learners. A collaborative digital reading annotation system allows learners to share their emotional perspectives on the text with their peers through appropriately types of reading annotation and response annotation designed by the system during dialogic reading to guide learners in developing different questioning and response skills. In this way, learners can think more deeply about the meaning of the emotional theme text as they learn to listen to the ideas of others, and support their emotional and academic development. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the differences in emotional intelligence and negative emotion regulation strategies between the learners of experimental and control groups who read collaboratively emotional theme texts by respectively using a collaborative digital reading annotation system and a traditional paper-based collaborative reading way.This study used a quasi-experimental research method and recruited the research participants from two classes in a Taiwan’s primary school to examine the research questions of the study. One class was randomly assigned to the experimental group that read an emotional theme text with the support of a collaborative digital reading annotation system, and the other class was assigned to the control group that read an emotional theme text by using a traditional paper-based collaborative reading way. The learners of two groups were subjected to an eight-week instruction experiment to examine whether there were significant differences between the learners of two groups in terms of their emotional intelligence and negative emotion regulation strategies under the teaching contents, teaching time, and instructors of two groups were controlled as the same. Besides, this study also proposes teaching suggestions and future research directions based on the research findings of this study.The results of the study show that, compared to collaborative reading with an emotional theme using traditional paper-based collaborative reading way, collaborative reading with an emotional theme text using the collaborative reading annotation system was more significantly effective in enhancing learners’ social-emotional skills, as well as their ability to listen to and feel the emotions of others and their satisfaction with their interpersonal relationships. Moreover, collaborative reading with an emotional theme text using the collaborative reading annotation system can also more effectively enhance learners’ negative emotion regulation strategies by identifying emotional contexts, reevaluating emotions, and accepting negative feelings when facing negative emotions. In addition, collaborative reading with an emotional theme text using the collaborative reading annotation system can more effectively reduce the number of ineffective reading annotations written by learners. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the collaborative reading annotation system can stimulate higher motivation, facilitate higher level thinking and high quality discussion than traditional paper-based collaborative reading way, and therefore effectively promotes the learning performance of primary school students in terms of emotional intelligence and emotion regulation strategies.參考文獻 一、中文文獻Goleman, D.（2016）。ＥＱ：決定一生幸福與成就的永恆力量〔張美惠譯〕。時報文化出版。（原著出版年：2005）李佳儒、林清文（2015）。兒童負向情緒調節策略量表編製研究. 教育心理學報, 47（1）, 1–21。doi: 10.6251/bep.20140903鄭聖敏、王振德（2009）。情緒智能量表青少年版指導手冊。心理出版社。陳勇汀（2011）。合作式閱讀標註之知識萃取機制研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學，臺北市。二、英文文獻Atrash, A., Abel, M.-H., & Moulin, C. (2015). Notes and annotations as information resources in a social networking platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1261–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.005Bal P. M., & Veltkamp M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? an experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLOS ONE, 8(1), e55341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341Ball, E., Franks, H., Jenkins, J., McGrath, M., & Leigh, J. (2009). Annotation is a valuable tool to enhance learning and assessment in student essays. Nurse Education Today, 29(3), 284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.10.005Best, J. (2021). To teach and delight: the varieties of learning from fiction. Review of General Psychology, 25(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1177/1089268020977173Brackett, M. A., Bailey, C. S., Hoffmann, J. D., & Simmons, D. N. (2019). RULER: A theory-driven, systemic approach to social, emotional, and academic Learning. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 144–161. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2019.1614447Brosch, T., & Sander, D. (2013). Comment: The appraising brain: towards a neuro-cognitive model of appraisal processes in emotion. Emotion Review, 5(2), 163–168. doi: 10.1177/1754073912468298Burklund, L., Creswell, J., Irwin, M., & Lieberman, M. (2014). The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00221Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Chapter 3—On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 41–84). Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50032-9Chen, C.-M., & Chen, F.-Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers & Education, 77, 67–81. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.010Constantinou, E., Van Den Houte, M., Bogaerts, K., Van Diest, I., & Van den Bergh, O. (2014). Can words heal? Using affect labeling to reduce the effects of unpleasant cues on symptom reporting. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00807Cook, A. L., Fettig, A., Morizio, L. J., Brodsky, L. M., & Gould, K. M. (2018). Culturally relevant dialogic reading curriculum for counselors: Supporting literacy and social-emotional development. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 4(1), 67–80. doi: 10.1080/23727810.2017.1351809Cook, A. L., Silva, M. R., Hayden, L. A., Brodsky, L., & Codding, R. (2017). Exploring the use of shared reading as a culturally responsive counseling intervention to promote academic and social-emotional development. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 3(1), 14–29. doi: 10.1080/23727810.2017.1280327Copersino, M. L. (2017). Cognitive mechanisms and therapeutic targets of addiction. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 13, 91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.005Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791Dowling, K., Simpkin, A. J., & Barry, M. M. (2019). A cluster randomized-controlled trial of the mind out social and emotional learning program for disadvantaged post-primary school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(7), 1245–1263. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-00987-3Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.xFettig, A., Cook, A. L., Morizio, L., Gould, K., & Brodsky, L. (2018). Using dialogic reading strategies to promote social-emotional skills for young students: An exploratory case study in an after-school program. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 16(4), 436–448. doi: 10.1177/1476718X18804848Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., Bonus, K., & Davidson, R. J. (2013). Mindfulness for teachers: A pilot study to assess effects on stress, burnout, and teaching efficacy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 182–195. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12026Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). Promoting prosocial behavior and self-regulatory skills in preschool children through a mindfulness-based kindness curriculum. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 44–51. doi: 10.1037/a0038256Gao, F. (2013). A case study of using a social annotation tool to support collaboratively learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.002Gasser, L., Dammert, Y., & Murphy, P. K. (2022). How do children socially learn from narrative fiction: Getting the lesson, simulating social worlds, or dialogic inquiry? Educational Psychology Review. doi: 10.1007/s10648-022-09667-4Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation: Taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13(3), 359–365. doi: 10.1037/a0032135Gyurak, A., Gross, J. J., & Etkin, A. (2011). Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A dual-process framework. Cognition and Emotion, 25(3), 400–412. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.544160Hofmann, W., Luhmann, M., Fisher, R. R., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 265–277. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12050Humphrey, N., Curran, A., Morris, E., Farrell, P., & Woods, K. (2007). Emotional intelligence and education: A critical review. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 235–254. doi: 10.1080/01443410601066735Immordino-Yang, M. H., Darling-Hammond, L., & Krone, C. R. (2019). Nurturing nature: How brain development is inherently social and emotional, and what this means for education. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 185–204. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2019.1633924Jagers, R. J., Rivas-Drake, D., & Williams, B. (2019). Transformative social and emotional learning (SEL): Toward SEL in service of educational equity and excellence. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 162–184. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2019.1623032Kircanski, K., Lieberman, M. D., & Craske, M. G. (2012). Feelings into words: Contributions of language to exposure therapy. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1086–1091. doi: 10.1177/0956797612443830Kuyken, W., Weare, K., Ukoumunne, O. C., Vicary, R., Motton, N., Burnett, R., Cullen, C., Hennelly, S., & Huppert, F. (2013). Effectiveness of the mindfulness in schools programme: Non-randomised controlled feasibility study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 203(2), 126–131. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126649Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting feelings into words. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.xLucchi Basili, L., & Sacco, P. L. (2021). Fictional narratives as a laboratory for the social cognition of behavioral change: My ajussi. Humanities, 10(4), 120. doi: 10.3390/h10040120Makany, T., Kemp, J., & Dror, I. E. (2009). Optimising the use of note-taking as an external cognitive aid for increasing learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 619–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00906.xMar, R. A. (2018). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the social processes and content entrained by narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 454–479. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209Marks, E. H., Walker, R. S. W., Ojalehto, H., Bedard-Gilligan, M. A., & Zoellner, L. A. (2019). Affect labeling to facilitate inhibitory learning: Clinical considerations. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 26(1), 201–213. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.05.001Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. doi: 10.1177/1754073916639667Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 507–536. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646McKay-Jackson, C. (2014). A critical approach to social emotional learning instruction through community-based service learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(3), 292–312. doi: 10.1177/1541344614543191McPhail, K. (2004). An emotional response to the state of accounting education: Developing accounting students’ emotional intelligence. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4), 629–648. doi: 10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00050-9Millgram, Y., Joormann, J., Huppert, J. D., Lampert, A., & Tamir, M. (2019). Motivations to experience happiness or sadness in depression: Temporal stability and implications for coping with stress. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 143–161. doi: 10.1177/2167702618797937Millgram, Y., Joormann, J., Huppert, J. D., & Tamir, M. (2015). Sad as a matter of choice? emotion-regulation goals in depression. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1216–1228. doi: 10.1177/0956797615583295Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: state of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124. doi: 10.1177/1754073912468165Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. doi: 10.1037/aca0000089Nathanson, L., Rivers, S. E., Flynn, L. M., & Brackett, M. A. (2016). Creating emotionally intelligent schools with RULER. Emotion Review, 8(4), 305–310. doi: 10.1177/1754073916650495Ng, S. C., & Sun, H. (2021). Promoting social emotional learning through shared book reading: Examining teacher’s strategies and children’s responses in kindergarten classrooms. Early Education and Development, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2021.1974232Niles, A. N., Craske, M. G., Lieberman, M. D., & Hur, C. (2015). Affect labeling enhances exposure effectiveness for public speaking anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 68, 27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.03.004Nokelainen, P., Kurhila, J., Miettinen, M., Floreen, P., & Tirri, H. (2003). Evaluating the role of a shared document-based annotation tool in learner-centered collaborative learning. Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies, 200–203. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2003.1215056Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002O’Dell, K. (2020). Modern marginalia: Using digital annotation in the composition classroom. Computers and Composition, 56, 102570. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102570Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2020). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development1. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 6–36. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2017.1398650Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312. doi: 10.1002/acp.1086Polleck, J. N. (2010). Using book clubs to enhance social–emotional and academic learning with urban adolescent females of color. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 27(1–2), 101–128. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2011.532717Raimundo, R., Marques-Pinto, A., & Lima, M. L. (2013). The effects of a social–emotional learning program on elementary school children: The role of pupils’ characteristics. Psychology in the Schools, 50(2), 165–180. doi: 10.1002/pits.21667Razon, S., Turner, J., Johnson, T. E., Arsal, G., & Tenenbaum, G. (2012). Effects of a collaborative annotation method on students’ learning and learning-related motivation and affect. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.004Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., Reyes, M. R., Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2012). Measuring emotional intelligence in early adolescence with the MSCEIT-YV: psychometric properties and relationship with academic performance and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(4), 344–366. doi: 10.1177/0734282912449443Robson, D. A., Allen, M. S., & Howard, S. J. (2020). Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 324–354. doi: 10.1037/bul0000227Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. doi: 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDGSchreuder, M.-C., & Savitz, R. S. (2020). Exploring adolescent motivation to read with an online YA book club. Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(3), 260–275. doi: 10.1080/19388071.2020.1752860Sklad, M., Diekstra, R., Ritter, M. D., Ben, J., & Gravesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892–909. doi: 10.1002/pits.21641Snyder, F., Flay, B., Vuchinich, S., Acock, A., Washburn, I., Beets, M., & Li, K.-K. (2009). Impact of a social-emotional and character development program on school-level indicators of academic achievement, absenteeism, and disciplinary outcomes: A matched-pair, cluster-randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3(1), 26–55. doi: 10.1080/19345740903353436Sur, B., Cleary, A., Rohrbaugh, M. J., Ferrer, E., & Sbarra, D. A. (2020). Beyond the “self” in self-regulation: Family interaction modulates situational self-control by adolescent drug users. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(3), 322–332. doi: 10.1037/fam0000598Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 199–222. doi: 10.1177/1088868315586325Tamir, M., Halperin, E., Porat, R., Bigman, Y. E., & Hasson, Y. (2019). When there’s a will, there’s a way: Disentangling the effects of goals and means in emotion regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 795–816. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000232Tamir, M., John, O. P., Srivastava, S., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 731–744. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.731Tamir, M., Mitchell, C., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation. Psychological Science, 19(4), 324–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02088.xTamir, M., Vishkin, A., & Gutentag, T. (2020). Emotion regulation is motivated. Emotion, 20(1), 115–119. doi: 10.1037/emo0000635Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.xTaylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12864Tijms, J., Stoop, M. A., & Polleck, J. N. (2018). Bibliotherapeutic book club intervention to promote reading skills and social–emotional competencies in low SES community-based high schools: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(3), 525–545. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12123Torrisi, S. J., Lieberman, M. D., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Altshuler, L. L. (2013). Advancing understanding of affect labeling with dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage, 82, 481–488. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.025Trach, J., Lee, M., & Hymel, S. (2018). A social-ecological approach to addressing emotional and behavioral problems in schools: Focusing on group processes and social dynamics. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26(1), 11–20. doi: 10.1177/1063426617742346Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., & Trifiletti, E. (2015). The greatest magic of harry potter: reducing prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(2), 105–121. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12279Vlasenko, V. V., Rogers, E. G., & Waugh, C. E. (2021). Affect labelling increases the intensity of positive emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 35(7), 1350–1364. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1959302Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 775–808. doi: 10.1037/a0027600Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., & Caulfield, M. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 552–559. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.552Yang, S. J. H., Chen, I. Y., & Shao, N. W. Y. (2004). Ontological enabled annotations and knowledge management for collaborative learning in a virtual learning community. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 70-81.Yih, J., Uusberg, A., Taxer, J. L., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Better together: A unified perspective on appraisal and emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 33(1), 41–47. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1504749 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
109913010資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109913010 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Chih-Ming en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 楊孟晴 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yang, Meng-Ching en_US dc.creator (作者) 楊孟晴 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Yang, Meng-Ching en_US dc.date (日期) 2022 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Aug-2022 19:05:45 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Aug-2022 19:05:45 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Aug-2022 19:05:45 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109913010 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141417 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 109913010 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在近幾年的研究中，有越來越多的研究指出情緒智能是能夠被教導而學習的，而選擇適當的文本並搭配對話式閱讀策略，有助於提升學習者的社會情感技能。目前學校教師的情緒主題文本教學，大多以面對面講授式教學與紙本討論為主要的教學模式，不但教學模式比較單調，並且不利於清楚記錄下學習者之間的討論軌跡，而「合作數位閱讀標註系統」可讓學習者在對話式閱讀的過程中，透過搭配設計適當的閱讀標註及回應標註類型與同儕交換對於文本中所傳達的情緒觀點，以利引導學習者發展出不同的提問與回應技巧。如此一來，學習者在學習傾聽他人的想法時，也能更深入思考文本的故事涵義，並且支持學習者在後期的情感發展與學術發展。因此，本研究旨在探討分別採用「合作數位閱讀標註系統」與「傳統紙本」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀的實驗組與控制組學習者，在情緒智能及負向情緒調節方法上的差異。本研究採用準實驗研究法，隨機挑選兩個國小六年級的班級為實驗對象，其中一班隨機分派為以「合作閱讀標註系統」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀的實驗組，另一班則為以「傳統紙本」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀的控制組，兩組學習者均進行為期八週的教學實驗，並控制兩組學習者的教學內容、教學時間與教學者皆相同，以比較兩組學習者在情緒智能及負向情緒調節方法上是否具有顯著的差異，並根據質性訪談內容提出教學建議與未來研究方向。研究結果發現，相較於「傳統紙本輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀」，採用「合作閱讀標註系統」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀，除了能夠有效的提升學習者的社會情緒能力之外，也能提升學習者傾聽與感受他人的情緒，以及對於自身人際關係的滿意度，並且採用「合作閱讀標註系統」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀，亦能有效提升學習者面對負向情緒時，採用辨識情緒脈絡、再評價情緒，以及接受負向感受等負向情緒調節方式。另外，使用「合作閱讀標註系統」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀，能夠有效的減少學習者撰寫出無效的閱讀標註。本研究證明「合作閱讀標註系統」能夠激發學習者產生更高的學習動機，有助於促進高層次的思考與進行高品質的討論互動，因此可有效促進情緒智能及情緒調節策略之學習成效。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, there have been more and more research to indicate that emotional intelligence can be taught and learned, and that selecting appropriate texts with the support of dialogic reading strategies can help learners improve their social-emotional skills. At present, most teachers in schools use face-to-face lectures and paper-based discussions as the main teaching mode for teaching emotional theme texts, which is not only monotonous but also not conducive to clearly recording the discussion processes among learners. A collaborative digital reading annotation system allows learners to share their emotional perspectives on the text with their peers through appropriately types of reading annotation and response annotation designed by the system during dialogic reading to guide learners in developing different questioning and response skills. In this way, learners can think more deeply about the meaning of the emotional theme text as they learn to listen to the ideas of others, and support their emotional and academic development. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the differences in emotional intelligence and negative emotion regulation strategies between the learners of experimental and control groups who read collaboratively emotional theme texts by respectively using a collaborative digital reading annotation system and a traditional paper-based collaborative reading way.This study used a quasi-experimental research method and recruited the research participants from two classes in a Taiwan’s primary school to examine the research questions of the study. One class was randomly assigned to the experimental group that read an emotional theme text with the support of a collaborative digital reading annotation system, and the other class was assigned to the control group that read an emotional theme text by using a traditional paper-based collaborative reading way. The learners of two groups were subjected to an eight-week instruction experiment to examine whether there were significant differences between the learners of two groups in terms of their emotional intelligence and negative emotion regulation strategies under the teaching contents, teaching time, and instructors of two groups were controlled as the same. Besides, this study also proposes teaching suggestions and future research directions based on the research findings of this study.The results of the study show that, compared to collaborative reading with an emotional theme using traditional paper-based collaborative reading way, collaborative reading with an emotional theme text using the collaborative reading annotation system was more significantly effective in enhancing learners’ social-emotional skills, as well as their ability to listen to and feel the emotions of others and their satisfaction with their interpersonal relationships. Moreover, collaborative reading with an emotional theme text using the collaborative reading annotation system can also more effectively enhance learners’ negative emotion regulation strategies by identifying emotional contexts, reevaluating emotions, and accepting negative feelings when facing negative emotions. In addition, collaborative reading with an emotional theme text using the collaborative reading annotation system can more effectively reduce the number of ineffective reading annotations written by learners. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the collaborative reading annotation system can stimulate higher motivation, facilitate higher level thinking and high quality discussion than traditional paper-based collaborative reading way, and therefore effectively promotes the learning performance of primary school students in terms of emotional intelligence and emotion regulation strategies. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄 I第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的與問題 3第三節 研究範圍與限制 4第四節 重要名詞解釋 5第二章 文獻探討 9第一節 情緒智能與社會情緒能力 9第二節 情緒調節策略與情緒標籤 15第三節 以合作閱讀標註系統輔助情緒文本閱讀 20第三章 研究設計與實施 23第一節 研究架構 23第二節 研究對象 24第三節 研究方法 25第四節 實驗設計 26第五節 研究工具 34第六節 資料處理與分析方法 36第七節 研究流程 38第四章 實驗結果分析 41第一節 採用「合作閱讀標註系統」及「傳統紙本」輔以情緒主 題文本合作閱讀的兩組學習者在情緒智能提升成效上的差異分析 41第二節 採用「合作閱讀標註系統」及「傳統紙本」輔以情緒主題文本合作閱讀的兩組學習者，在負向情緒調節策略上的差異分析 49第三節 採用「合作閱讀標註系統」及「傳統紙本」輔以情緒主 題文本合作閱讀兩組學習者的閱讀標註行為差異分析 58第四節 質性資料分析 60第五節 綜合討論 70第五章 結論與建議 83第一節 研究結論 83第二節 教學實施與建議 89第三節 未來研究與方向 91參考文獻 94一、中文文獻 94二、英文文獻 94附錄一 家長同意書 101附錄二 訪談大綱 102附錄三 兒童負向情緒策略量表使用同意書 104附錄四 情緒智能量表使用同意書 105 zh_TW dc.format.extent 21060928 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109913010 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 合作閱讀標註系統 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情緒智能 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情緒調節策略 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 重新評估認知 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情緒標籤 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會情緒學習 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情緒療癒閱讀 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Collaborative reading annotation system en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Emotional intelligence en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Emotional regulation strategies en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cognitive reappraisal en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Affect labeling en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social-emotional learning en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) emotional healing reading en_US dc.title (題名) 合作數位閱讀標註系統輔以情緒主題文本閱讀對於國小學童情緒智能及情緒調節策略之影響研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Effects of Reading Emotional Texts with the Support of Collaborative Reading Annotation System on Primary School Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Regulation Strategies en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文文獻Goleman, D.（2016）。ＥＱ：決定一生幸福與成就的永恆力量〔張美惠譯〕。時報文化出版。（原著出版年：2005）李佳儒、林清文（2015）。兒童負向情緒調節策略量表編製研究. 教育心理學報, 47（1）, 1–21。doi: 10.6251/bep.20140903鄭聖敏、王振德（2009）。情緒智能量表青少年版指導手冊。心理出版社。陳勇汀（2011）。合作式閱讀標註之知識萃取機制研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學，臺北市。二、英文文獻Atrash, A., Abel, M.-H., & Moulin, C. (2015). Notes and annotations as information resources in a social networking platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1261–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.005Bal P. M., & Veltkamp M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? an experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLOS ONE, 8(1), e55341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341Ball, E., Franks, H., Jenkins, J., McGrath, M., & Leigh, J. (2009). Annotation is a valuable tool to enhance learning and assessment in student essays. Nurse Education Today, 29(3), 284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.10.005Best, J. (2021). To teach and delight: the varieties of learning from fiction. Review of General Psychology, 25(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1177/1089268020977173Brackett, M. A., Bailey, C. S., Hoffmann, J. D., & Simmons, D. N. (2019). RULER: A theory-driven, systemic approach to social, emotional, and academic Learning. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 144–161. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2019.1614447Brosch, T., & Sander, D. (2013). Comment: The appraising brain: towards a neuro-cognitive model of appraisal processes in emotion. Emotion Review, 5(2), 163–168. doi: 10.1177/1754073912468298Burklund, L., Creswell, J., Irwin, M., & Lieberman, M. (2014). The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00221Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Chapter 3—On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 41–84). Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50032-9Chen, C.-M., & Chen, F.-Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers & Education, 77, 67–81. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.010Constantinou, E., Van Den Houte, M., Bogaerts, K., Van Diest, I., & Van den Bergh, O. (2014). Can words heal? Using affect labeling to reduce the effects of unpleasant cues on symptom reporting. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00807Cook, A. L., Fettig, A., Morizio, L. J., Brodsky, L. M., & Gould, K. M. (2018). Culturally relevant dialogic reading curriculum for counselors: Supporting literacy and social-emotional development. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 4(1), 67–80. doi: 10.1080/23727810.2017.1351809Cook, A. L., Silva, M. R., Hayden, L. A., Brodsky, L., & Codding, R. (2017). Exploring the use of shared reading as a culturally responsive counseling intervention to promote academic and social-emotional development. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 3(1), 14–29. doi: 10.1080/23727810.2017.1280327Copersino, M. L. (2017). Cognitive mechanisms and therapeutic targets of addiction. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 13, 91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.005Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791Dowling, K., Simpkin, A. J., & Barry, M. M. (2019). A cluster randomized-controlled trial of the mind out social and emotional learning program for disadvantaged post-primary school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(7), 1245–1263. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-00987-3Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.xFettig, A., Cook, A. L., Morizio, L., Gould, K., & Brodsky, L. (2018). Using dialogic reading strategies to promote social-emotional skills for young students: An exploratory case study in an after-school program. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 16(4), 436–448. doi: 10.1177/1476718X18804848Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., Bonus, K., & Davidson, R. J. (2013). Mindfulness for teachers: A pilot study to assess effects on stress, burnout, and teaching efficacy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 182–195. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12026Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). Promoting prosocial behavior and self-regulatory skills in preschool children through a mindfulness-based kindness curriculum. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 44–51. doi: 10.1037/a0038256Gao, F. (2013). A case study of using a social annotation tool to support collaboratively learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.002Gasser, L., Dammert, Y., & Murphy, P. K. (2022). How do children socially learn from narrative fiction: Getting the lesson, simulating social worlds, or dialogic inquiry? Educational Psychology Review. doi: 10.1007/s10648-022-09667-4Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation: Taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13(3), 359–365. doi: 10.1037/a0032135Gyurak, A., Gross, J. J., & Etkin, A. (2011). Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A dual-process framework. Cognition and Emotion, 25(3), 400–412. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.544160Hofmann, W., Luhmann, M., Fisher, R. R., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82(4), 265–277. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12050Humphrey, N., Curran, A., Morris, E., Farrell, P., & Woods, K. (2007). Emotional intelligence and education: A critical review. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 235–254. doi: 10.1080/01443410601066735Immordino-Yang, M. H., Darling-Hammond, L., & Krone, C. R. (2019). Nurturing nature: How brain development is inherently social and emotional, and what this means for education. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 185–204. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2019.1633924Jagers, R. J., Rivas-Drake, D., & Williams, B. (2019). Transformative social and emotional learning (SEL): Toward SEL in service of educational equity and excellence. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 162–184. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2019.1623032Kircanski, K., Lieberman, M. D., & Craske, M. G. (2012). Feelings into words: Contributions of language to exposure therapy. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1086–1091. doi: 10.1177/0956797612443830Kuyken, W., Weare, K., Ukoumunne, O. C., Vicary, R., Motton, N., Burnett, R., Cullen, C., Hennelly, S., & Huppert, F. (2013). Effectiveness of the mindfulness in schools programme: Non-randomised controlled feasibility study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 203(2), 126–131. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.126649Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting feelings into words. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.xLucchi Basili, L., & Sacco, P. L. (2021). Fictional narratives as a laboratory for the social cognition of behavioral change: My ajussi. Humanities, 10(4), 120. doi: 10.3390/h10040120Makany, T., Kemp, J., & Dror, I. E. (2009). Optimising the use of note-taking as an external cognitive aid for increasing learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 619–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00906.xMar, R. A. (2018). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the social processes and content entrained by narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 454–479. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209Marks, E. H., Walker, R. S. W., Ojalehto, H., Bedard-Gilligan, M. A., & Zoellner, L. A. (2019). Affect labeling to facilitate inhibitory learning: Clinical considerations. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 26(1), 201–213. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.05.001Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. doi: 10.1177/1754073916639667Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 507–536. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646McKay-Jackson, C. (2014). A critical approach to social emotional learning instruction through community-based service learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(3), 292–312. doi: 10.1177/1541344614543191McPhail, K. (2004). An emotional response to the state of accounting education: Developing accounting students’ emotional intelligence. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4), 629–648. doi: 10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00050-9Millgram, Y., Joormann, J., Huppert, J. D., Lampert, A., & Tamir, M. (2019). Motivations to experience happiness or sadness in depression: Temporal stability and implications for coping with stress. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 143–161. doi: 10.1177/2167702618797937Millgram, Y., Joormann, J., Huppert, J. D., & Tamir, M. (2015). Sad as a matter of choice? emotion-regulation goals in depression. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1216–1228. doi: 10.1177/0956797615583295Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: state of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124. doi: 10.1177/1754073912468165Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. doi: 10.1037/aca0000089Nathanson, L., Rivers, S. E., Flynn, L. M., & Brackett, M. A. (2016). Creating emotionally intelligent schools with RULER. Emotion Review, 8(4), 305–310. doi: 10.1177/1754073916650495Ng, S. C., & Sun, H. (2021). Promoting social emotional learning through shared book reading: Examining teacher’s strategies and children’s responses in kindergarten classrooms. Early Education and Development, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2021.1974232Niles, A. N., Craske, M. G., Lieberman, M. D., & Hur, C. (2015). Affect labeling enhances exposure effectiveness for public speaking anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 68, 27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.03.004Nokelainen, P., Kurhila, J., Miettinen, M., Floreen, P., & Tirri, H. (2003). Evaluating the role of a shared document-based annotation tool in learner-centered collaborative learning. Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies, 200–203. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2003.1215056Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002O’Dell, K. (2020). Modern marginalia: Using digital annotation in the composition classroom. Computers and Composition, 56, 102570. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102570Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2020). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development1. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 6–36. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2017.1398650Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312. doi: 10.1002/acp.1086Polleck, J. N. (2010). Using book clubs to enhance social–emotional and academic learning with urban adolescent females of color. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 27(1–2), 101–128. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2011.532717Raimundo, R., Marques-Pinto, A., & Lima, M. L. (2013). The effects of a social–emotional learning program on elementary school children: The role of pupils’ characteristics. Psychology in the Schools, 50(2), 165–180. doi: 10.1002/pits.21667Razon, S., Turner, J., Johnson, T. E., Arsal, G., & Tenenbaum, G. (2012). Effects of a collaborative annotation method on students’ learning and learning-related motivation and affect. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.004Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., Reyes, M. R., Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2012). Measuring emotional intelligence in early adolescence with the MSCEIT-YV: psychometric properties and relationship with academic performance and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(4), 344–366. doi: 10.1177/0734282912449443Robson, D. A., Allen, M. S., & Howard, S. J. (2020). Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 324–354. doi: 10.1037/bul0000227Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. doi: 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDGSchreuder, M.-C., & Savitz, R. S. (2020). Exploring adolescent motivation to read with an online YA book club. Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(3), 260–275. doi: 10.1080/19388071.2020.1752860Sklad, M., Diekstra, R., Ritter, M. D., Ben, J., & Gravesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892–909. doi: 10.1002/pits.21641Snyder, F., Flay, B., Vuchinich, S., Acock, A., Washburn, I., Beets, M., & Li, K.-K. (2009). Impact of a social-emotional and character development program on school-level indicators of academic achievement, absenteeism, and disciplinary outcomes: A matched-pair, cluster-randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3(1), 26–55. doi: 10.1080/19345740903353436Sur, B., Cleary, A., Rohrbaugh, M. J., Ferrer, E., & Sbarra, D. A. (2020). Beyond the “self” in self-regulation: Family interaction modulates situational self-control by adolescent drug users. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(3), 322–332. doi: 10.1037/fam0000598Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 199–222. doi: 10.1177/1088868315586325Tamir, M., Halperin, E., Porat, R., Bigman, Y. E., & Hasson, Y. (2019). When there’s a will, there’s a way: Disentangling the effects of goals and means in emotion regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 795–816. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000232Tamir, M., John, O. P., Srivastava, S., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 731–744. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.731Tamir, M., Mitchell, C., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation. Psychological Science, 19(4), 324–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02088.xTamir, M., Vishkin, A., & Gutentag, T. (2020). Emotion regulation is motivated. Emotion, 20(1), 115–119. doi: 10.1037/emo0000635Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.xTaylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12864Tijms, J., Stoop, M. A., & Polleck, J. N. (2018). Bibliotherapeutic book club intervention to promote reading skills and social–emotional competencies in low SES community-based high schools: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(3), 525–545. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12123Torrisi, S. J., Lieberman, M. D., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Altshuler, L. L. (2013). Advancing understanding of affect labeling with dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage, 82, 481–488. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.025Trach, J., Lee, M., & Hymel, S. (2018). A social-ecological approach to addressing emotional and behavioral problems in schools: Focusing on group processes and social dynamics. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26(1), 11–20. doi: 10.1177/1063426617742346Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., & Trifiletti, E. (2015). The greatest magic of harry potter: reducing prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(2), 105–121. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12279Vlasenko, V. V., Rogers, E. G., & Waugh, C. E. (2021). Affect labelling increases the intensity of positive emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 35(7), 1350–1364. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1959302Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 775–808. doi: 10.1037/a0027600Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., & Caulfield, M. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 552–559. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.552Yang, S. J. H., Chen, I. Y., & Shao, N. W. Y. (2004). Ontological enabled annotations and knowledge management for collaborative learning in a virtual learning community. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 70-81.Yih, J., Uusberg, A., Taxer, J. L., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Better together: A unified perspective on appraisal and emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 33(1), 41–47. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1504749 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202201004 en_US
