1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Law
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 臺灣防制洗錢及打擊資恐之公私協力機制與展望—以資訊分享機制為核心
Current Status and Future Prospects for Public-Private Partnerships in Taiwan in the Fight against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing – Focusing on Information Sharing Mechanisms
作者 許庭甄
Hsu, Ting-Zhen
貢獻者 臧正運
Tsang, Cheng-Yun
許庭甄
Hsu, Ting-Zhen
關鍵詞 防制洗錢
打擊資恐
公私協力
資訊分享
Money Laundering
Terrorist Financing
Public-Private Partnership
Information-Sharing
日期 2022
上傳時間 2-Sep-2022 15:10:48 (UTC+8)
摘要 全球防制洗錢及打擊資恐力道日益增強，為有效阻斷犯罪活動，許多國家已建立 戰略性公私協力夥伴關係，促使公、私部門有效且及時合作。國內政府機關長期 致力於對抗洗錢及資恐犯罪，但甚少觸及或探討如何利用公私協力夥伴關係獲取 更全面性的資源以打擊犯罪。本論文目標係就國內現有公私協力機制提出具體改 善方案，內容首先檢視臺灣現行防制洗錢及打擊資恐機制之架構、作法，並歸納 評鑑指列缺失，其次分析公私協力機制在德國、英國、加拿大、美國、澳洲、新 加坡及香港等國家之運作模式及成功關鍵因素，最後以半結構化方式訪談國內金 融機構和洗錢防制權責機關共七位重要成員以進行深入分析，就促進本國資訊分 享之提案，凝聚公私部門代表寶貴建議，為我國防制洗錢及打擊資恐公私協力機 制擘劃藍圖。
The worldwide fight against money laundering and terrorist financing is gaining momentum. To effectively disrupt criminal activities, many countries have developed strategic public-private partnerships, an approach which enable the public and private sectors to cooperate in a synergistic and timely manner. In Taiwan, the government has devoted considerable efforts to strengthening the current mechanisms to tackle ML/TF problems and challenges but has rarely touched upon the issues of public-private collaboration in order to facilitate access to a broader range of information, a move which would elevate the effectiveness of combating crime. This thesis aims to provide suggestions for possible improvements in intensifying the partnerships between public and private sectors by firstly examining the strengths and vulnerabilities of Taiwan’s current mechanisms in combating money laundering and terrorist financing, then secondly, analyzing successful key factors of PPP operations executed in other countries including Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, United States, Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong, while finally, conducting semi-structured interviews with key personnel within financial institutions and relevant authorities to facilitate in-depth analysis to structure information-sharing PPP schemes for future development.
參考文獻 Reference
1. AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2020); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2019); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2018); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2017); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2016).
2. AMLD, MJIB, AMLD PRESS (2021).
3. AML/CTF Act, part 11, § 121-123 (2006).
4. AML/CFT Industry Partnership (ACIP), MAS (2021), https://www.mas.gov.sg/regulation/anti-money-laundering/amlcft-industry-partnership-acip.
5. AML/CFT and Public-Private Sector Partnership, FATF (May 20, 2016), https://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/fatfgeneral/documents/public-private-sector-partnership.html.
6. Anti-Financial Crime Alliance, BaFin (October 4, 2019) https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Meldung/2019/meldung_190925_Anti_Financial_Crime_en.html.
7. ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING OFFICE, EXECUTIVE YUAN, NATIONAL ML/TF RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT (2017).
8. APG, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING MEASURES-CHINESE TAIPEI, THIRD MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT (2019).
9. Crime and Courts Act, section 7 (2013).
10. Criminal Finances Act, section 11 (2017).
11. Egnew, R.C. & Baler, S.G., Developing principles, goals, and models for public/private partnerships, 25 ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH 578, 571-580 (1998).
12. Erik Hans Klijn & Geert Teisman, Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public–Private Partnership: An Analysis of Dutch Cases, 23 PUBLIC MONEY MANAG. 137, 138-139 (2003).
13. Ezezika, O.C. et al., To Trust or Not to Trust: A Model for Effectively Governing Public-Private Partnerships, 16 AGBIOFORUM, 27, 27 (2013).
14. FATF, INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCING TERRORISM & PROLIFERATION: THE FATF RECOMMENDATIONS (2021).
15. FATF, PRIVATE SECTOR INFORMATION SHARING 5 (2017).
16. FATF, PROCEDURE FOR THE FATF FORTH ROUND OF AML/CFT MUTUAL EVALUATIONS (2013).
17. FinCEN Exchange in New York City Focuses on Virtual Currency, FinCEN (2019), https://www.fincen.gov/resources/financial-crime-enforcement-network-exchange.
18. FinCEN, FinCEN’s 314(a) Fact Sheet (2022), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/314afactsheet.pdf.
19. FinCEN, Subject: Guidance on the Scope of Permissible Information Sharing Covered by Section 314(b) Safe Harbor of the USA PATRIOT Act (2009), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/fin-2009-g002.pdf.
20. FIU GERMANY, ANNUAL REPORT 2019 (2020).
21. Fraud and Money Laundering Intelligence Taskforce launched, HKMA (May 26, 2017), https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/news-and-media/press-releases/2017/05/20170526-3/.
22. FSC, Guideline for Information Sharing among Financial Institutions (2021), https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202112230006&dtable=News.
23. Improving the UK’s Response to Economic Crime, NCA (Apr. 12, 2020), https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/national-economic-crime-centre.
24. Greg Baldwin, Information Sharing Under Sections 314(a) and 314(b) of the USA Patriot Act 2 (Holland & Knight LLP, 2008).
25. Industry Guidelines, ABS (2019) https://abs.org.sg/industry-guidelines/aml-cft-industry-partnership.
26. Information Sharing Insight, FinCEN (2019), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/314bparticipationinfo.pdf.
27. JANE NELSON & SIMON
28. ZADEK, PARTNERSHIP ALCHEMY: NEW SOCIAL PARTNERSHIPS IN EUROPE, COPENHAGEN: COPENHAGEN CENTRE (2000).
29. JMLIT, PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFORMATION SHARING PARTNERSHIP TO TACKLE MONEY LAUNDERING IN THE FINANCE SECTOR (2020).
30. Jomo, Kwame Sundaram ET AL., Public-Private Partnerships and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Fit for purpose? (United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Working Paper No.148, 2016), available at http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2016/wp148_2016.pdf.
31. Joseph J. Norton, A perceived trend in modern international financial regulation: Increasing reliance on a public-private partnership, 37 INT’L LAW. 43, 43 (2003).
32. Joseph Mari, Project Protect: An In-Depth Review of the Public-Private Partnership to Combat Human Trafficking in Canada, ACAMSTODAY, (Dec. 2017), https://www.acamstoday.org/project-protect-combat-human-trafficking-in-canada.
33. Judicial Reform Foundation, Statement of opinion in response to the draft amendment to the MLCA proposed by the Ministry of Justice in 2021(2022), https://www.jrf.org.tw/articles/2228.
34. Julia Paschal Davis, Public-Private Partnerships, 44 PROCUREMENT LAW 9, 9-10 (2008).
35. Kenneth Pemberton, ASP Regional Head of Complex Investigations, HSBC, Keynote Speech at the ACAMS, the 12th Annual Country Conference/Symposium Series (Jan. 21, 2021).
36. Kochan Nick, Regulation: Anti-Money Laundering - UK - Banks Engage in AML Fight, THE BANKER (Jun. 10, 2016), https://www.thebanker.com/Banking-Regulation-Risk/Banks-engage-in-anti-money-laundering-fight/(language)/eng-GB?ct=true.
37. Laws and Regulations, Banking Bureau, FSC (2019), https://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawArticle.aspx?LawID=A040390041067000-1070709.
38. Lisa M. Ellram, The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships, JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND MATERIAL MANAGEMENT, Sep. 1, 1990, at 8, 8-10.
39. MARIO CERVANTES, OECD, STRATEGIC PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR INNOVATION (2016).
40. MARIO GARA ET AL., BANK OF RESEARCH PAPER, THE IMPACT OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING OVERSIGHT ON BANK’S SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTION REPORTING: EVIDENCE FROM ITALY (2019).
41. MAS and Financial Industry to Use New Digital Platform to Fight Money Laundering, MAS (2021) https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/media-releases/2021/mas-and-financial-industry-to-use-new-digital-platform-to-fight-money-laundering.
42. Miller Chris, Partner in Regeneration: Constructing a Local Regime for Urban Management, 27 POLICY AND POLITICS 343, 343-344 (1999).
43. Ministry of Justice, Draft amendment on Articles of the MLCA (2021), https://www.moj.gov.tw/2204/2795/2799/125801/post.
44. News Release: FINTRAC publishes indicators of money laundering through casino-related underground banking, FINTRAC, GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (Dec. 2019), https://www.fintrac-canafe.gc.ca/new-neuf/nr/2019-12-10-eng.
45. NICK J MAXWELL, FFIS, FIVE YEARS OF GROWTH IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION-SHARING PARTNERSHIPS TO TACKLE CRIME 19-22 (2020).
46. NICK J MAXWELL & DAVID ARTINGSTALL, RUSI, THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION-SHARING PARTNERSHIPS IN THE DISRUPTION OF CRIME (2017).
47. NICK J MAXWELL, RUSI, EXPANDING THE CAPABILITY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATIONAL-SHARING (2019).
48. Nick Kochan, How Law Enforcement is Partnering up with Banks in AML Fight, WOLTERS KLUWER (Apr. 17, 2020), http://www.wolterskluwerfs.com/article/how-law-enforcement-is-partnering-up-with-banks-in-aml-fight.aspx.
49. Nutavoot Pongsiri, Regulation and Public-Private Partnerships, 15 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT 489, 495 (2002).
50. PAMELA K. BUNDI, UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA, THE ROLE OF SYNERGY IN THE SUCCESS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: A CASE STUDY OF THE FINANCIAL INCLUSION IMPROVES SANITATION AND HEALTH IN KENYA (FINISH INK) PROJECT (2020).
51. Paula Chadderton & Simon Norton, Public-Private Partnerships to Disrupt Financial Crime Exploratory Study of Australia’s Fintel Alliance (SWIFT Institute Working Paper, 2019).
52. PAULINE VAILLANCOURT ROSENAU, MAPPING THE TERRAIN OF THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE POLICY PARTNERSHIP (2000).
53. Public Private Partnership - Anti-Financial Crime Alliance, Zoll (2021) https://www.zoll.de/DE/FIU/Anti-Financial-Crime-Alliance/anti-financia-crime-alliance_node.html.
54. RONALD W. MCQUAID, THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL: PARTNERSHIP ADVANTAGES, DISADVANTAGES AND SUCCESS FACTORS, THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE? 127, 130-134 (Stephen P. Osborne ed., 2010).
55. Statistics of Justice, Ministry of Justice (2021), file:///Users/daisyhsu/Downloads/%E6%B3%95%E5%8B%99%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E6%91%98%E8%A6%81110%E5%B9%B41%E6%9C%88_%E6%A0%B8%E5%AE%9A(1100322%E6%8A%BD%E6%8F%9B).pdf.
56. Statistics of Justice, Ministry of Justice (2022), https://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/rjsdweb/book/Book_Detail.aspx?book_id=525.
57. Strengthening Information and Intelligence Sharing, HKMA (May 10, 2017), https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-information/guidelines-and-circular/2018/20180510e2.pdf.
58. Tactical Intelligence: Project Protect, FINTRAC (2019), https://www.theglobeandmail.com/files/editorial/News/0219-nw-na-trafficking/PROJECT- PROTECT.pdf.
59. THE ASIA/PACIFIC GROUP ON MONEY LAUNDERING, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING MEASURES-HONG KONG, MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT (2019).
60. The Life Insurance Association of the Republic of China, Guideline for Information Sharing among Financial Institutions (2021), https://law.lia-roc.org.tw/Law/Content?lsid=FL097893.
61. Ya-Mian Hsu, Financial Institutions are Uptight Preparing for the coming APG Mutual Evaluation, ANUE (Mar. 4, 2018), https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/4052090.
62. YING-MING WU, RESEARCH ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: JOINT PUBLIC-PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN DEVELOPMNET (1996).
63. ZHANG TENG, ACAMS, DEFENSIVE SAR FILING: AN UNNECESSARILY HEAVY BURDEN ON THE AML FIELD (2018).
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
法學院碩士在職專班
104961014
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104961014
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 臧正運zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Tsang, Cheng-Yunen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 許庭甄zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsu, Ting-Zhenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 許庭甄zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Ting-Zhenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-Sep-2022 15:10:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Sep-2022 15:10:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Sep-2022 15:10:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0104961014en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141666-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 法學院碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 104961014zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 全球防制洗錢及打擊資恐力道日益增強，為有效阻斷犯罪活動，許多國家已建立 戰略性公私協力夥伴關係，促使公、私部門有效且及時合作。國內政府機關長期 致力於對抗洗錢及資恐犯罪，但甚少觸及或探討如何利用公私協力夥伴關係獲取 更全面性的資源以打擊犯罪。本論文目標係就國內現有公私協力機制提出具體改 善方案，內容首先檢視臺灣現行防制洗錢及打擊資恐機制之架構、作法，並歸納 評鑑指列缺失，其次分析公私協力機制在德國、英國、加拿大、美國、澳洲、新 加坡及香港等國家之運作模式及成功關鍵因素，最後以半結構化方式訪談國內金 融機構和洗錢防制權責機關共七位重要成員以進行深入分析，就促進本國資訊分 享之提案，凝聚公私部門代表寶貴建議，為我國防制洗錢及打擊資恐公私協力機 制擘劃藍圖。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The worldwide fight against money laundering and terrorist financing is gaining momentum. To effectively disrupt criminal activities, many countries have developed strategic public-private partnerships, an approach which enable the public and private sectors to cooperate in a synergistic and timely manner. In Taiwan, the government has devoted considerable efforts to strengthening the current mechanisms to tackle ML/TF problems and challenges but has rarely touched upon the issues of public-private collaboration in order to facilitate access to a broader range of information, a move which would elevate the effectiveness of combating crime. This thesis aims to provide suggestions for possible improvements in intensifying the partnerships between public and private sectors by firstly examining the strengths and vulnerabilities of Taiwan’s current mechanisms in combating money laundering and terrorist financing, then secondly, analyzing successful key factors of PPP operations executed in other countries including Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, United States, Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong, while finally, conducting semi-structured interviews with key personnel within financial institutions and relevant authorities to facilitate in-depth analysis to structure information-sharing PPP schemes for future development.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Table of Contents
Abstract 6
Acknowledgment 7
List of Abbreviations 9
Chapter 1 Introduction 11
1.1 Research Background 11
1.2 Objectives 12
1.3 Organization of the Research 12
1.4 Research Ethics Review 12
Chapter 2 Literature Review 13
2.1 Definition of PPP 13
2.2 Advantages of PPP 14
2.3 Components of Successful PPP 16
2.4 Challenges in Forming Effective PPP 17
2.5 Challenges in Sharing Information within PPP Mechanisms 20
Chapter 3 Research Methodology 21
3.1 Methods of Research 21
3.2 Interview Participants 21
3.3 Interview Questions 22
3.4 Research Limitation 22
Chapter 4 Taiwan’s Collaborative Mechanism to Combat ML/TF 23
4.1 Key Stakeholders 23
4.2 Current Mechanisms 27
4.2.1 Legislation Framework 27
4.2.2 legislation for Information Sharing 29
4.2.3 Collaborative Mechanisms 31
4.3 Key Findings in APG MER 2019 33
Chapter 5 PPP Models in Other Countries 36
5.1 Germany-AFCA 36
5.2 United Kingdom-JMLIT 38
5.3 Canada-Awareness Projects 41
5.4 United States-The FinCEN Exchange 43
5.5 Australia-Fintel Alliance 45
5.6 Singapore-ACIP 47
5.7 Hong Kong-FMLIT 49
Chapter 6 Interview Result and Discussions 57
6.1 Interview Result 57
6.1.1 Private sector responses 57
6.1.2 Public sector responses 65
6.2 Findings from Interviews 81
6.2.1 Private Sector 81
6.2.2 Public Sector 83
6.3 Implications and Discussion 85
Chapter 7 Suggestions for Future Development 88
Chapter 8 Conclusion 91
Reference 93
Appendix A Private Sector_ Interview Outline 98
Appendix B Public Sector_ Interview Outline 101		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1952826 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104961014en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 防制洗錢zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 打擊資恐zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公私協力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資訊分享zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Money Launderingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Terrorist Financingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Public-Private Partnershipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Information-Sharingen_US
dc.title (題名) 臺灣防制洗錢及打擊資恐之公私協力機制與展望—以資訊分享機制為核心zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Current Status and Future Prospects for Public-Private Partnerships in Taiwan in the Fight against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing – Focusing on Information Sharing Mechanismsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reference
1. AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2020); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2019); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2018); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2017); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2016).
2. AMLD, MJIB, AMLD PRESS (2021).
3. AML/CTF Act, part 11, § 121-123 (2006).
4. AML/CFT Industry Partnership (ACIP), MAS (2021), https://www.mas.gov.sg/regulation/anti-money-laundering/amlcft-industry-partnership-acip.
5. AML/CFT and Public-Private Sector Partnership, FATF (May 20, 2016), https://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/fatfgeneral/documents/public-private-sector-partnership.html.
6. Anti-Financial Crime Alliance, BaFin (October 4, 2019) https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Meldung/2019/meldung_190925_Anti_Financial_Crime_en.html.
7. ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING OFFICE, EXECUTIVE YUAN, NATIONAL ML/TF RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT (2017).
8. APG, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING MEASURES-CHINESE TAIPEI, THIRD MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT (2019).
9. Crime and Courts Act, section 7 (2013).
10. Criminal Finances Act, section 11 (2017).
11. Egnew, R.C. & Baler, S.G., Developing principles, goals, and models for public/private partnerships, 25 ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH 578, 571-580 (1998).
12. Erik Hans Klijn & Geert Teisman, Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public–Private Partnership: An Analysis of Dutch Cases, 23 PUBLIC MONEY MANAG. 137, 138-139 (2003).
13. Ezezika, O.C. et al., To Trust or Not to Trust: A Model for Effectively Governing Public-Private Partnerships, 16 AGBIOFORUM, 27, 27 (2013).
14. FATF, INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCING TERRORISM & PROLIFERATION: THE FATF RECOMMENDATIONS (2021).
15. FATF, PRIVATE SECTOR INFORMATION SHARING 5 (2017).
16. FATF, PROCEDURE FOR THE FATF FORTH ROUND OF AML/CFT MUTUAL EVALUATIONS (2013).
17. FinCEN Exchange in New York City Focuses on Virtual Currency, FinCEN (2019), https://www.fincen.gov/resources/financial-crime-enforcement-network-exchange.
18. FinCEN, FinCEN’s 314(a) Fact Sheet (2022), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/314afactsheet.pdf.
19. FinCEN, Subject: Guidance on the Scope of Permissible Information Sharing Covered by Section 314(b) Safe Harbor of the USA PATRIOT Act (2009), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/fin-2009-g002.pdf.
20. FIU GERMANY, ANNUAL REPORT 2019 (2020).
21. Fraud and Money Laundering Intelligence Taskforce launched, HKMA (May 26, 2017), https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/news-and-media/press-releases/2017/05/20170526-3/.
22. FSC, Guideline for Information Sharing among Financial Institutions (2021), https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202112230006&dtable=News.
23. Improving the UK’s Response to Economic Crime, NCA (Apr. 12, 2020), https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/national-economic-crime-centre.
24. Greg Baldwin, Information Sharing Under Sections 314(a) and 314(b) of the USA Patriot Act 2 (Holland & Knight LLP, 2008).
25. Industry Guidelines, ABS (2019) https://abs.org.sg/industry-guidelines/aml-cft-industry-partnership.
26. Information Sharing Insight, FinCEN (2019), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/314bparticipationinfo.pdf.
27. JANE NELSON & SIMON
28. ZADEK, PARTNERSHIP ALCHEMY: NEW SOCIAL PARTNERSHIPS IN EUROPE, COPENHAGEN: COPENHAGEN CENTRE (2000).
29. JMLIT, PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFORMATION SHARING PARTNERSHIP TO TACKLE MONEY LAUNDERING IN THE FINANCE SECTOR (2020).
30. Jomo, Kwame Sundaram ET AL., Public-Private Partnerships and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Fit for purpose? (United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Working Paper No.148, 2016), available at http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2016/wp148_2016.pdf.
31. Joseph J. Norton, A perceived trend in modern international financial regulation: Increasing reliance on a public-private partnership, 37 INT’L LAW. 43, 43 (2003).
32. Joseph Mari, Project Protect: An In-Depth Review of the Public-Private Partnership to Combat Human Trafficking in Canada, ACAMSTODAY, (Dec. 2017), https://www.acamstoday.org/project-protect-combat-human-trafficking-in-canada.
33. Judicial Reform Foundation, Statement of opinion in response to the draft amendment to the MLCA proposed by the Ministry of Justice in 2021(2022), https://www.jrf.org.tw/articles/2228.
34. Julia Paschal Davis, Public-Private Partnerships, 44 PROCUREMENT LAW 9, 9-10 (2008).
35. Kenneth Pemberton, ASP Regional Head of Complex Investigations, HSBC, Keynote Speech at the ACAMS, the 12th Annual Country Conference/Symposium Series (Jan. 21, 2021).
36. Kochan Nick, Regulation: Anti-Money Laundering - UK - Banks Engage in AML Fight, THE BANKER (Jun. 10, 2016), https://www.thebanker.com/Banking-Regulation-Risk/Banks-engage-in-anti-money-laundering-fight/(language)/eng-GB?ct=true.
37. Laws and Regulations, Banking Bureau, FSC (2019), https://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawArticle.aspx?LawID=A040390041067000-1070709.
38. Lisa M. Ellram, The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships, JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND MATERIAL MANAGEMENT, Sep. 1, 1990, at 8, 8-10.
39. MARIO CERVANTES, OECD, STRATEGIC PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR INNOVATION (2016).
40. MARIO GARA ET AL., BANK OF RESEARCH PAPER, THE IMPACT OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING OVERSIGHT ON BANK’S SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTION REPORTING: EVIDENCE FROM ITALY (2019).
41. MAS and Financial Industry to Use New Digital Platform to Fight Money Laundering, MAS (2021) https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/media-releases/2021/mas-and-financial-industry-to-use-new-digital-platform-to-fight-money-laundering.
42. Miller Chris, Partner in Regeneration: Constructing a Local Regime for Urban Management, 27 POLICY AND POLITICS 343, 343-344 (1999).
43. Ministry of Justice, Draft amendment on Articles of the MLCA (2021), https://www.moj.gov.tw/2204/2795/2799/125801/post.
44. News Release: FINTRAC publishes indicators of money laundering through casino-related underground banking, FINTRAC, GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (Dec. 2019), https://www.fintrac-canafe.gc.ca/new-neuf/nr/2019-12-10-eng.
45. NICK J MAXWELL, FFIS, FIVE YEARS OF GROWTH IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION-SHARING PARTNERSHIPS TO TACKLE CRIME 19-22 (2020).
46. NICK J MAXWELL & DAVID ARTINGSTALL, RUSI, THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION-SHARING PARTNERSHIPS IN THE DISRUPTION OF CRIME (2017).
47. NICK J MAXWELL, RUSI, EXPANDING THE CAPABILITY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATIONAL-SHARING (2019).
48. Nick Kochan, How Law Enforcement is Partnering up with Banks in AML Fight, WOLTERS KLUWER (Apr. 17, 2020), http://www.wolterskluwerfs.com/article/how-law-enforcement-is-partnering-up-with-banks-in-aml-fight.aspx.
49. Nutavoot Pongsiri, Regulation and Public-Private Partnerships, 15 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT 489, 495 (2002).
50. PAMELA K. BUNDI, UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA, THE ROLE OF SYNERGY IN THE SUCCESS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: A CASE STUDY OF THE FINANCIAL INCLUSION IMPROVES SANITATION AND HEALTH IN KENYA (FINISH INK) PROJECT (2020).
51. Paula Chadderton & Simon Norton, Public-Private Partnerships to Disrupt Financial Crime Exploratory Study of Australia’s Fintel Alliance (SWIFT Institute Working Paper, 2019).
52. PAULINE VAILLANCOURT ROSENAU, MAPPING THE TERRAIN OF THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE POLICY PARTNERSHIP (2000).
53. Public Private Partnership - Anti-Financial Crime Alliance, Zoll (2021) https://www.zoll.de/DE/FIU/Anti-Financial-Crime-Alliance/anti-financia-crime-alliance_node.html.
54. RONALD W. MCQUAID, THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL: PARTNERSHIP ADVANTAGES, DISADVANTAGES AND SUCCESS FACTORS, THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE? 127, 130-134 (Stephen P. Osborne ed., 2010).
55. Statistics of Justice, Ministry of Justice (2021), file:///Users/daisyhsu/Downloads/%E6%B3%95%E5%8B%99%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E6%91%98%E8%A6%81110%E5%B9%B41%E6%9C%88_%E6%A0%B8%E5%AE%9A(1100322%E6%8A%BD%E6%8F%9B).pdf.
56. Statistics of Justice, Ministry of Justice (2022), https://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/rjsdweb/book/Book_Detail.aspx?book_id=525.
57. Strengthening Information and Intelligence Sharing, HKMA (May 10, 2017), https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-information/guidelines-and-circular/2018/20180510e2.pdf.
58. Tactical Intelligence: Project Protect, FINTRAC (2019), https://www.theglobeandmail.com/files/editorial/News/0219-nw-na-trafficking/PROJECT- PROTECT.pdf.
59. THE ASIA/PACIFIC GROUP ON MONEY LAUNDERING, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING MEASURES-HONG KONG, MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT (2019).
60. The Life Insurance Association of the Republic of China, Guideline for Information Sharing among Financial Institutions (2021), https://law.lia-roc.org.tw/Law/Content?lsid=FL097893.
61. Ya-Mian Hsu, Financial Institutions are Uptight Preparing for the coming APG Mutual Evaluation, ANUE (Mar. 4, 2018), https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/4052090.
62. YING-MING WU, RESEARCH ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: JOINT PUBLIC-PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN DEVELOPMNET (1996).
63. ZHANG TENG, ACAMS, DEFENSIVE SAR FILING: AN UNNECESSARILY HEAVY BURDEN ON THE AML FIELD (2018).		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202201154en_US