Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 重返秩序的超驗基礎：沃格林的法律哲學
The Return to the Transcendental Ground of the Order: Eric Voegelin’s Philosophy of Law作者 黃彥瑜
Huang, Yen-Yu貢獻者 江玉林
Chiang, Yu-Lin
黃彥瑜
Huang, Yen-Yu關鍵詞 沃格林
法律哲學
規範性
神祕主義
Eric Voegelin
Philosophy of law
Normativity
Mysticism日期 2022 上傳時間 5-Oct-2022 09:06:31 (UTC+8) 摘要 沃格林（Eric Voegelin）認為法律規範性的來源是「本體論上的應然」（Ought in the ontological sense)，或者說是⼈在超驗的真正秩序與經驗的⼈造秩序之中體驗到的張⼒。這樣的法哲學建⽴在⼀種哲學⼈類學之上，將⼈看作在超驗與經驗、彼世與此世之間的存有。⼈因來⾃超驗端的牽引，⽽體驗到規範性。這樣的法哲學是神祕主義的。此外，只有根植於超驗與經驗之間的神祕主義法哲學，才能正當地導引⼈對於絕對之物的追求。藉此，它避免法秩序衰敗為沃格林稱為「諾斯替主義」的失序，進⽽⾛向極權主義的悲劇。
Eric Voegelin considers the source of the normativity of law to be “Ought in the ontological sense”, or the tension experienced by man between the transcendental true order and the empirical man-made order. A legal philosophy of this kind presupposes a sort of philosophical anthropology that treats a human as a being between transcendence and mundanity. Man is guided by the Transcendent, and hence he experiences normativity. Such a philosophy of law is mystical. Furthermore, only a mystical philosophy of law based between transcendence and mundanity can rightfully guide man’s pursuit of the Absolute. Thereby, it prevents the legal order from decaying into disorder which Voegelin names Gnosticism and eventually collapsing into the tragedy of totalitarianism.參考文獻 英文、德文部分Arnold, Eckhart (2007). Eric Voegelin als Schüler Hans Kelsens, erchienen in: Der Kreis um Hans Kelsen. Die Anfangsjahre der Reinen Rechtslehre, Robert Walter, Clemens Jabloner, Klaus Zeleny Hrsg., Wien, 2007.Chiassoni, Pierluigi (2014). Kelsen on Natural Law Theory: An Enduring Critical Affair, doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.2976 .Cohen, Julius (1978). The Political Element in Legal Theory: A Look at Kelsen`s Pure Theory, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 88, No. 1, Nov., 1978.Cooper, Barry & Bruhn, Jodi ed. (2008). VOEGELIN RECOLLECTED: CONVERSATIONS ON A LIFE, Columbia, Missouri: University of Missouri Press.Cooper, Barry (1999). ERIC VOEGELIN AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN POLITICAL SCIENCE, Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press.Davis, Zachary and Steinbock, Anthony (2021). "Max Scheler", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta eds., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/scheler/ .Eckhardt, Karl August (1936). Richteramt, in: Rechtsfertigungen des Unrechts: Das Rechtsdenken im Nationsozialismus in Originaltexten, 2014.Ellis Sandoz, Ellis (2011). What is a Mystic Philosopher and Why does it Matter? Eric Voegelin Society, 27th Annual International Meeting, Seattle, Washington, September 2, 2011, https://sites01.lsu.edu/faculty/voegelin/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2015/09/Ellis-Sandoz.pdf.Finnis, John (2011). NATURAL LAW AND NATURAL RIGHTS, Oxford: Oxford Uni. Press.Fillafer, Franz Leander and Feichtinger, Johannes (2019). Natural Law and the Vienna School: Hans Kelsen, Alfred Verdross, and Eric Voegelin, in: HANS KELSEN AND THE NATURAL LAW TRADITION, Peter Langford, Ian Bryan, John McGarry ed.Frank, Hans (1935). Einleitung zum »Nationsozialistischen Handbuch für Recht und Gesetzgebung«, in: Rechtsfertigungen des Unrechts: Das Rechtsdenken im Nationsozialismus in Originaltexten, 2014.Fuller, B. A. G. (1907) The Theory of God in Book Λ of Aristotle`s Metaphysics, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 170-183.Fuller, Lon L. (1969). THE MORALITY OF LAW: Revised Edition, New Haven and London: Yale Uni. Press.Gontier, Thierry (2009). From “Political Theology” to “Political Religion”: Voegelin and Schmitt, VoegelinView, September 28, 2009, https://voegelinview.com/voegelin-and-carl-schmitt/ .Grotius, Hugo (2005). THE RIGHTS OF WAR AND PEACE, Book I, Richard Tuck eds., Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Hesse, Hermann (2013). Demian: Die Geschichte von Emil Sinclair Jugend, Gutenberg eBook edition.Hughes, Glenn (1993). MYSTERY AND MYTH IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF ERIC VOEGELIN, Columbia, Missouri: University of Missouri Press.Kelsen, Hans (1960). Reine Rechtslehre, 2. Auflage 1960, Nachdruck 1992.Kelsen, Hans (2004). A NEW SCIENCE OF POLITICS: Hans Kelsen`s Reply to Eric Voegelin`s "New Science of Politics". A Contribution to the Critique of Ideology, Eckhart Arnold eds., Frankfurt, Lancaster: ontos verlag, 2004Kelsen, Hans (2006). Verteidigung der Demokratie, herausgeben von Matthias Jestaedt und Oliver Lepsius, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Kelsen, Hans (2012). SECULAR RELIGION: A POLEMIC AGAINST THE MISINTERPRETATION OF MODERN SOCIAL PHILOSOOHY, SCIENCE AND POLITICS AS “NEW RELIGIONS”, Wien, New York: Springer.Lisska, Anthony J. (2010). Contemporary Natural Law Theory, in: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO ETHICS, John Skorupski eds. London and New York: Routledge.Martin, Patrick H. (2002). Natural Law: Voegelin and The End of [Legal] Philosophy, Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 879-96.Ott, Walter and Buob, Franziska (1993). Did Legal Positivism Render German Jurists Defenceless During the Third Reich ? Social and Legal Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 91-104.Passos, Eduardo Schmidt (2009) Eric Voegelin and the Natural Law Tradition, Perspectives on Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 210-7, doi: 10.1080/10457097.2019.1612506.Petropulos, William (2000). The Person as ‘Imago Dei’: Augustine and Max Scheler in Eric Voegelin’s ‘Herrschaftslehre’ and ‘The Political Religions’, OCCASIONAL PAPERS, Eric-Voegelin-Archiv, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.Preuss, Lawrence (1934). Germanic Law versus Roman Law in National Socialist Legal Theory, Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 269-75.Sandoz, Ellis (2010). The Spirit of Voegelin’s Late Works, Voegelin View, https://voegelinview.com/the-spirit-of-voegelins-late-work-pt-1/ .Schram, Glenn (1992). Critical Notice: The Nature of the Law and Related Legal Writings, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp. 357-67.Sigwart, Hans-Jörg (2005). Some Principles of Voegelinian Hermeneutics – Eric Voegelin ́s Reading of Jean Bodin, Paper presented at the 21st annual meeting of the Eric Voegelin Society, at the annual conference of the American Political Science Association, 2005, Washington, D.C. https://sites01.lsu.edu/faculty/voegelin/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2015/09/Sigwart2.pdf .Stradaioli, Nicoletta (2005). Philosophical Anthropology: Voegelin`s debt to Max Scheler, https://sites01.lsu.edu/faculty/voegelin/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2015/09/Nicoletta-Stradaioli2.pdfSweet, William (2019). "Jacques Maritain". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/maritain/.Voegelin, Eric (1952). THE NEW SCIENCE OF POLITICS, Uni. Chicago Press, 1974 Ninth Impression.Voegelin, Eric (1978). ANAMNESIS, transl. & ed. by Gerhart Niemeyer, University of Notre Dame Press.Voegelin, Eric (1991) The Theory of Legal Science: A Review, CW 27.Voegelin, Eric (1991). Supplementary Notes for Students in Jurisprudence Course, LSU Law School 1954-1957, CW 27.Voegelin, Eric (1991). THE NATURE OF THE LAW AND RELATED LEGAL WRITINGS, Robert Anthony Pascal, James Lee Babin, John William Corrington ed., CW 27.Voegelin, Eric (1998). HISTORY OF POLITICAL IDEAS, Vol. II: The Middle Ages to Aquinas, CW 20.Voegelin, Eric (1998). HISTORY OF POLITICAL IDEAS, Vol. V: Religion and the Rise of Modernity, CW 23. 中譯本：《政治概念史稿・卷五》，霍偉岸翻譯，上海：華東師範大學出版社，2019年。Voegelin, Eric (1999). HISTORY OF POLITICAL IDEAS, Vol. VI: Revolution and the New Science, CW 24.Voegelin, Eric (1999). THE AUTHORITARIAN STATE: AN ESSAY ON THE PROBLEM OF THE AUSTRIAN STATE, Ruth Hein transl., CW 4Voegelin, Eric (1999). ORDER AND HISTORY, Vol. III: Plato and Aristotle, CW 16.Voegelin, Eric (2000). ORDER AND HISTORY, Vol. II: The Word of the Polis, CW 15.Voegelin, Eric (2001). ORDER AND HISTORY, Vol. I: Israel and Revelation, CW 14.Voegelin, Eric (2004). Ersatz Religion: The Gnostic Mass Movement of Our Time, in: Eric Voegelin, SCIENCE, POLITICS AND GNOSTICSISM, Wilmington, Delaware: ISI Books.Voegelin, Eric (2004). SCIENCE, POLITICS AND GNOSTICISM, William J. Fitzpatrick transl., Wilmington, Del.: ISI Books.Voegelin, Eric (2011). AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL REFLECTIONS, Ellis Sandoz eds., Columbia, Missouri: University of Missouri Press.Webb, Eugene (1987). ERIC VOEGELIN: PHILOSOPHER OF HISTORY, Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Yang, Kenny (2012). The Rise of Legal Positivism in Germany: A Prelude to Nazi Arbitrariness? The Western Australian Jurist, Vol 3, pp.245-57.中文部分江玉林（2018）。人格理念與文化法治國家——洪遜欣的法理學思想，國立中正大學法學集刊，第61期，頁59-100，2018年10月。吳經熊（1966），正義的探討，現代學苑，第3期第8卷，頁307-9，1966年8月，doi: 10.7065/MRAS.196608.0001。吳經熊（2005）。自然法哲學的比較研究，載：吳經熊著，許章潤主編，法律哲學研究，頁26-43，北京：清華。吳經熊（2005）。在進化中的自然法，載：吳經熊著，許章潤主編，法律哲學研究，頁44-54，北京：清華。吳經熊（2006）。哲學與文化，台北：三民，二版。吳經熊（2017）。超越東西方：天下奇才吳經熊自傳，台北：財團法人聖保祿孝女會附設上智文化事業。林嘉培（2018）。沃格林的種族論述研究，國立政治大學哲學系碩士學位論文。洪遜欣（1982）。法理學，台北：三民書局。高文琦（2020）。法與道德——以「契約必須遵守」為例，載：張文郁等，法理學，鄧衍森等主編，頁49-72，台北：元照出版。陳文團（2000）。吳經熊的比較方法，哲學與文化，第27期第7卷，頁625-35，2000年7月，doi:10.7065/MRPC.200007.0625。陳妙芬（2021）。自然法：法哲學研究，台北：聯經出版。陳建南（2005）。沃格林論諾斯替主義與現代性，中原大學宗教研究所碩士學位論文。陳建南（2014）。沃格林的歷史哲學——歷史的二元共質之神秘引導，輔仁大學哲學系博士學位論文。陳建南（2020）。沃格林：諾斯底主義，「諾斯底與哲學」學術研討會會議手冊，輔仁大學哲學系，頁119-137，2020年12月19日。曾慶豹（2020）。屬靈人、靈知人與哲人：漢語學界的爭論，「諾斯底與哲學」學術研討會會議手冊，輔仁大學哲學系，頁4-33，2020年12月19日。黃哲翰（2018）。納粹與他們的產地（下）：1938武統「德意志東疆」，網址：https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8664/3504120 ，最後瀏覽日：2022年7月16日。楊尚儒（2011）。政治統一體與代表——沃格林對施米特政治代表理論的批判，政治與社會哲學評論，37期（2011年6月1日），頁39-74。聖多瑪斯・阿奎那（2008）。神學大全，第六冊，劉俊餘譯，中華道明會、碧岳學社。拉丁原文參照：https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/FS/FS091.html#FSQ91OUTP1。 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
法律學系
107651024資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107651024 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 江玉林 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chiang, Yu-Lin en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃彥瑜 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Huang, Yen-Yu en_US dc.creator (作者) 黃彥瑜 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Huang, Yen-Yu en_US dc.date (日期) 2022 en_US dc.date.accessioned 5-Oct-2022 09:06:31 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 5-Oct-2022 09:06:31 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Oct-2022 09:06:31 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107651024 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142088 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 法律學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107651024 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 沃格林（Eric Voegelin）認為法律規範性的來源是「本體論上的應然」（Ought in the ontological sense)，或者說是⼈在超驗的真正秩序與經驗的⼈造秩序之中體驗到的張⼒。這樣的法哲學建⽴在⼀種哲學⼈類學之上，將⼈看作在超驗與經驗、彼世與此世之間的存有。⼈因來⾃超驗端的牽引，⽽體驗到規範性。這樣的法哲學是神祕主義的。此外，只有根植於超驗與經驗之間的神祕主義法哲學，才能正當地導引⼈對於絕對之物的追求。藉此，它避免法秩序衰敗為沃格林稱為「諾斯替主義」的失序，進⽽⾛向極權主義的悲劇。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Eric Voegelin considers the source of the normativity of law to be “Ought in the ontological sense”, or the tension experienced by man between the transcendental true order and the empirical man-made order. A legal philosophy of this kind presupposes a sort of philosophical anthropology that treats a human as a being between transcendence and mundanity. Man is guided by the Transcendent, and hence he experiences normativity. Such a philosophy of law is mystical. Furthermore, only a mystical philosophy of law based between transcendence and mundanity can rightfully guide man’s pursuit of the Absolute. Thereby, it prevents the legal order from decaying into disorder which Voegelin names Gnosticism and eventually collapsing into the tragedy of totalitarianism. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第⼀章 緒論 1第⼀節 研究問題與動機 1第⼆節 ⽂獻回顧 5第三節 沃格林其⼈其思想概談 7第四節 研究⽅法與章節架構安排 13第⼆章 《法之本質》與法的超驗根源 15第⼀節 為何閱讀《法之本質》？ 15第⼆節 試尋法之本質 17第三節 本體論上的應然、法律的規範性與秩序的維繫 31第四節 對現實秩序的批判與作為⽴法者的哲學家 44第五節 ⼩結：神祕主義的法哲學 49第三章 沃格林的神祕主義哲學 51第⼀節 哲學家、哲學⼈類學與存有的秩序 52第⼆節 當代社會的失序：諾斯替主義 69第三節 沃格林筆下的神祕主義哲學家 80⼀、柏拉圖 81⼆、聖阿奎那 89三、博丹 95第四節 ⼩結 101第四章 神祕主義法哲學：何謂⼜為何？ 106第⼀節 凱爾森問題——法應該與超越的基礎斷裂嗎？ 107第⼆節 沃格林、洪遜欣、吳經熊，與憲政主義問題 118第三節 有序的靈魂中的法哲學 131第五章 結論 136參考⽂獻 140 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2259079 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107651024 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 沃格林 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 法律哲學 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 規範性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 神祕主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Eric Voegelin en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Philosophy of law en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Normativity en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mysticism en_US dc.title (題名) 重返秩序的超驗基礎：沃格林的法律哲學 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Return to the Transcendental Ground of the Order: Eric Voegelin’s Philosophy of Law en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文、德文部分Arnold, Eckhart (2007). Eric Voegelin als Schüler Hans Kelsens, erchienen in: Der Kreis um Hans Kelsen. Die Anfangsjahre der Reinen Rechtslehre, Robert Walter, Clemens Jabloner, Klaus Zeleny Hrsg., Wien, 2007.Chiassoni, Pierluigi (2014). Kelsen on Natural Law Theory: An Enduring Critical Affair, doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.2976 .Cohen, Julius (1978). The Political Element in Legal Theory: A Look at Kelsen`s Pure Theory, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 88, No. 1, Nov., 1978.Cooper, Barry & Bruhn, Jodi ed. (2008). VOEGELIN RECOLLECTED: CONVERSATIONS ON A LIFE, Columbia, Missouri: University of Missouri Press.Cooper, Barry (1999). ERIC VOEGELIN AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN POLITICAL SCIENCE, Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press.Davis, Zachary and Steinbock, Anthony (2021). "Max Scheler", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta eds., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/scheler/ .Eckhardt, Karl August (1936). Richteramt, in: Rechtsfertigungen des Unrechts: Das Rechtsdenken im Nationsozialismus in Originaltexten, 2014.Ellis Sandoz, Ellis (2011). What is a Mystic Philosopher and Why does it Matter? Eric Voegelin Society, 27th Annual International Meeting, Seattle, Washington, September 2, 2011, https://sites01.lsu.edu/faculty/voegelin/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2015/09/Ellis-Sandoz.pdf.Finnis, John (2011). NATURAL LAW AND NATURAL RIGHTS, Oxford: Oxford Uni. Press.Fillafer, Franz Leander and Feichtinger, Johannes (2019). Natural Law and the Vienna School: Hans Kelsen, Alfred Verdross, and Eric Voegelin, in: HANS KELSEN AND THE NATURAL LAW TRADITION, Peter Langford, Ian Bryan, John McGarry ed.Frank, Hans (1935). Einleitung zum »Nationsozialistischen Handbuch für Recht und Gesetzgebung«, in: Rechtsfertigungen des Unrechts: Das Rechtsdenken im Nationsozialismus in Originaltexten, 2014.Fuller, B. A. G. (1907) The Theory of God in Book Λ of Aristotle`s Metaphysics, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 170-183.Fuller, Lon L. (1969). THE MORALITY OF LAW: Revised Edition, New Haven and London: Yale Uni. Press.Gontier, Thierry (2009). From “Political Theology” to “Political Religion”: Voegelin and Schmitt, VoegelinView, September 28, 2009, https://voegelinview.com/voegelin-and-carl-schmitt/ .Grotius, Hugo (2005). THE RIGHTS OF WAR AND PEACE, Book I, Richard Tuck eds., Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Hesse, Hermann (2013). Demian: Die Geschichte von Emil Sinclair Jugend, Gutenberg eBook edition.Hughes, Glenn (1993). MYSTERY AND MYTH IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF ERIC VOEGELIN, Columbia, Missouri: University of Missouri Press.Kelsen, Hans (1960). Reine Rechtslehre, 2. Auflage 1960, Nachdruck 1992.Kelsen, Hans (2004). A NEW SCIENCE OF POLITICS: Hans Kelsen`s Reply to Eric Voegelin`s "New Science of Politics". A Contribution to the Critique of Ideology, Eckhart Arnold eds., Frankfurt, Lancaster: ontos verlag, 2004Kelsen, Hans (2006). Verteidigung der Demokratie, herausgeben von Matthias Jestaedt und Oliver Lepsius, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Kelsen, Hans (2012). SECULAR RELIGION: A POLEMIC AGAINST THE MISINTERPRETATION OF MODERN SOCIAL PHILOSOOHY, SCIENCE AND POLITICS AS “NEW RELIGIONS”, Wien, New York: Springer.Lisska, Anthony J. (2010). Contemporary Natural Law Theory, in: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO ETHICS, John Skorupski eds. London and New York: Routledge.Martin, Patrick H. (2002). Natural Law: Voegelin and The End of [Legal] Philosophy, Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 879-96.Ott, Walter and Buob, Franziska (1993). Did Legal Positivism Render German Jurists Defenceless During the Third Reich ? Social and Legal Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 91-104.Passos, Eduardo Schmidt (2009) Eric Voegelin and the Natural Law Tradition, Perspectives on Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 210-7, doi: 10.1080/10457097.2019.1612506.Petropulos, William (2000). The Person as ‘Imago Dei’: Augustine and Max Scheler in Eric Voegelin’s ‘Herrschaftslehre’ and ‘The Political Religions’, OCCASIONAL PAPERS, Eric-Voegelin-Archiv, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.Preuss, Lawrence (1934). Germanic Law versus Roman Law in National Socialist Legal Theory, Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 269-75.Sandoz, Ellis (2010). The Spirit of Voegelin’s Late Works, Voegelin View, https://voegelinview.com/the-spirit-of-voegelins-late-work-pt-1/ .Schram, Glenn (1992). Critical Notice: The Nature of the Law and Related Legal Writings, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp. 357-67.Sigwart, Hans-Jörg (2005). Some Principles of Voegelinian Hermeneutics – Eric Voegelin ́s Reading of Jean Bodin, Paper presented at the 21st annual meeting of the Eric Voegelin Society, at the annual conference of the American Political Science Association, 2005, Washington, D.C. https://sites01.lsu.edu/faculty/voegelin/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2015/09/Sigwart2.pdf .Stradaioli, Nicoletta (2005). Philosophical Anthropology: Voegelin`s debt to Max Scheler, https://sites01.lsu.edu/faculty/voegelin/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2015/09/Nicoletta-Stradaioli2.pdfSweet, William (2019). "Jacques Maritain". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/maritain/.Voegelin, Eric (1952). THE NEW SCIENCE OF POLITICS, Uni. Chicago Press, 1974 Ninth Impression.Voegelin, Eric (1978). ANAMNESIS, transl. & ed. by Gerhart Niemeyer, University of Notre Dame Press.Voegelin, Eric (1991) The Theory of Legal Science: A Review, CW 27.Voegelin, Eric (1991). Supplementary Notes for Students in Jurisprudence Course, LSU Law School 1954-1957, CW 27.Voegelin, Eric (1991). THE NATURE OF THE LAW AND RELATED LEGAL WRITINGS, Robert Anthony Pascal, James Lee Babin, John William Corrington ed., CW 27.Voegelin, Eric (1998). HISTORY OF POLITICAL IDEAS, Vol. II: The Middle Ages to Aquinas, CW 20.Voegelin, Eric (1998). HISTORY OF POLITICAL IDEAS, Vol. V: Religion and the Rise of Modernity, CW 23. 中譯本：《政治概念史稿・卷五》，霍偉岸翻譯，上海：華東師範大學出版社，2019年。Voegelin, Eric (1999). HISTORY OF POLITICAL IDEAS, Vol. VI: Revolution and the New Science, CW 24.Voegelin, Eric (1999). THE AUTHORITARIAN STATE: AN ESSAY ON THE PROBLEM OF THE AUSTRIAN STATE, Ruth Hein transl., CW 4Voegelin, Eric (1999). ORDER AND HISTORY, Vol. III: Plato and Aristotle, CW 16.Voegelin, Eric (2000). ORDER AND HISTORY, Vol. II: The Word of the Polis, CW 15.Voegelin, Eric (2001). ORDER AND HISTORY, Vol. I: Israel and Revelation, CW 14.Voegelin, Eric (2004). Ersatz Religion: The Gnostic Mass Movement of Our Time, in: Eric Voegelin, SCIENCE, POLITICS AND GNOSTICSISM, Wilmington, Delaware: ISI Books.Voegelin, Eric (2004). SCIENCE, POLITICS AND GNOSTICISM, William J. Fitzpatrick transl., Wilmington, Del.: ISI Books.Voegelin, Eric (2011). AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL REFLECTIONS, Ellis Sandoz eds., Columbia, Missouri: University of Missouri Press.Webb, Eugene (1987). ERIC VOEGELIN: PHILOSOPHER OF HISTORY, Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Yang, Kenny (2012). The Rise of Legal Positivism in Germany: A Prelude to Nazi Arbitrariness? The Western Australian Jurist, Vol 3, pp.245-57.中文部分江玉林（2018）。人格理念與文化法治國家——洪遜欣的法理學思想，國立中正大學法學集刊，第61期，頁59-100，2018年10月。吳經熊（1966），正義的探討，現代學苑，第3期第8卷，頁307-9，1966年8月，doi: 10.7065/MRAS.196608.0001。吳經熊（2005）。自然法哲學的比較研究，載：吳經熊著，許章潤主編，法律哲學研究，頁26-43，北京：清華。吳經熊（2005）。在進化中的自然法，載：吳經熊著，許章潤主編，法律哲學研究，頁44-54，北京：清華。吳經熊（2006）。哲學與文化，台北：三民，二版。吳經熊（2017）。超越東西方：天下奇才吳經熊自傳，台北：財團法人聖保祿孝女會附設上智文化事業。林嘉培（2018）。沃格林的種族論述研究，國立政治大學哲學系碩士學位論文。洪遜欣（1982）。法理學，台北：三民書局。高文琦（2020）。法與道德——以「契約必須遵守」為例，載：張文郁等，法理學，鄧衍森等主編，頁49-72，台北：元照出版。陳文團（2000）。吳經熊的比較方法，哲學與文化，第27期第7卷，頁625-35，2000年7月，doi:10.7065/MRPC.200007.0625。陳妙芬（2021）。自然法：法哲學研究，台北：聯經出版。陳建南（2005）。沃格林論諾斯替主義與現代性，中原大學宗教研究所碩士學位論文。陳建南（2014）。沃格林的歷史哲學——歷史的二元共質之神秘引導，輔仁大學哲學系博士學位論文。陳建南（2020）。沃格林：諾斯底主義，「諾斯底與哲學」學術研討會會議手冊，輔仁大學哲學系，頁119-137，2020年12月19日。曾慶豹（2020）。屬靈人、靈知人與哲人：漢語學界的爭論，「諾斯底與哲學」學術研討會會議手冊，輔仁大學哲學系，頁4-33，2020年12月19日。黃哲翰（2018）。納粹與他們的產地（下）：1938武統「德意志東疆」，網址：https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8664/3504120 ，最後瀏覽日：2022年7月16日。楊尚儒（2011）。政治統一體與代表——沃格林對施米特政治代表理論的批判，政治與社會哲學評論，37期（2011年6月1日），頁39-74。聖多瑪斯・阿奎那（2008）。神學大全，第六冊，劉俊餘譯，中華道明會、碧岳學社。拉丁原文參照：https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/FS/FS091.html#FSQ91OUTP1。 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202201573 en_US
