| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭光明 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 游宜庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Yu, Yi-Ting | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 游宜庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Yu, Yi-Ting | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2022 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 5-Oct-2022 09:25:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 5-Oct-2022 09:25:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-Oct-2022 09:25:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0105154003 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142166 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 哲學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 105154003 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 「隱私」和個人在社會中的生活息息相關，是一個經常被使用於劃清個人或是小團體與大群體間的界限的詞彙。然而，無論是在哲學亦或是法學當中，皆沒有一個對隱私的決定性定義。本文旨在探討「隱私」在哲學討論中的不同面向，以釐清此概念在不同情境之下的意義，並試圖提出將「倫理（ethics）」作為隱私權是否適用在特定情境中的依據。本文對隱私的討論將區分為三大面向：一、隱私的描述性與規範性意義。二、隱私在物質與心理層面上的行使。三、隱私於個人與社會之關係。透過此一區分，本文試圖論證「隱私」作為一個概念與「隱私權」之間的關聯，以及論證隱私乃個人作為獨立個體而存在不可或缺的要素。同時，本文欲引進「倫理」作為判斷特定情況下個人是否享有隱私權的依據。透過提出此一評判依據，筆者期望能夠對隱私在哲學中的討論以及其應用有所貢獻。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | “Privacy” as a term is closely related to our everyday life, often used when one is in need of a space isolated from the larger part of the society. However, when it comes to its discussion, there is yet a consensus as to the definition of privacy and the realm it covers. This thesis aims to draw an outline of privacy in its philosophical discussion, and put forward three aspects that privacy considers, namely:1. The descriptive and normative interests of privacy2. The physical and psychological aspect of privacy3. The social and personal approach to privacyThrough such distinctions, this thesis aims to draw the link between “privacy” and “privacy rights”. Furthermore, this thesis aims to introduce “ethics” into the discussion of privacy in order to set a criterion for privacy-applicable situations. With ethics, this thesis would like to contribute to the application of privacy, both as a philosophical concept and as a legal one. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction 1Chapter 1. Privacy: its nature and the right to privacy 81.1 Privacy as a state or condition 81.2 Privacy as a measure of control 141.3 Privacy as a right 17Chapter 2. The Physical and Psychological Aspects of Privacy 232.1 Westin’s claim on privacy 242.2 Wasserstrom’s claim on privacy 322.3 Critiques on Westin and Wasserstrom 362.4 The physical and psychological aspects of privacy 402.5 Justifying the right to privacy 43Chapter 3. The Social and Personal Approaches to Privacy 473.1 Warren and Brandeis’ claim on privacy 483.2 Rachels’ claim on privacy 503.3 The individual and social aspects of privacy 533.4 Case discussions on the right to privacy 56Chapter 4. Ethics in Privacy 654.1 Ethics and morals 664.2 Ethics and privacy 684.3 Justifying the right to privacy with ethics 724.4 Some applications 74Chapter 5. Conclusion and Further Discussions 82Bibliography 86 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 707093 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105154003 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 隱私 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 倫理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 隱私權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 描述義隱私 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 規範義隱私 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Privacy | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Privacy rights | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Ethics | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Morals | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 隱私的哲學探究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Privacy and Ethics: A Philosophical Study | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allen, Anita L. (2003). Why Privacy Isn`t Everything. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Cooley, T. M. I. (1879). A Treatise on the Law of Torts: Or the wrongs which arise independently of contract. Chicago: Callaghan and Company.DeCew, Judith Wagner. (1997). In Pursuit Of Privacy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Levy, K., Schneier, B. (2020). Privacy threats in intimate relationships. Journal of Cybersecurity, 6(1). doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyaa006Locke, J. (2016). Second Treatise of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration. Goldie, M. (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1988). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1991). Toward A Feminist Theory Of The State. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.Mill, John Stuart. (2010). On Liberty. London: Penguin Books.Moore, Adam D. (2010). Privacy Rights: Moral And Legal Foundations. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.Nussbaum, Martha C. (2000). Is Privacy Bad For Women?. Boston Review.Parent, W. A. (1983). Privacy, Morality, and the Law. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(4), 269–288. http://www.jstor.org/stable/226537Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred Dycus Miller, and Jeffrey Paul. (2010). The Right To Privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Schoeman, D. (1984). Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Thomas, Laurence. (2007). Contemporary Debates In Social Philosophy. (pp. 131-145). Oxford: Blackwell.Thomson, Judith J. (1975). The Right to Privacy, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4: 295–314Warren, Samuel D., and Brandeis, Louis D. (1890). The Right To Privacy. Harvard Law Review 4.5 (1890): 193. | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.6814/NCCU202201528 | en_US |
