學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 南韓在美國與中國之間的避險戰略
South Korea`s Hedging Strategy between the United States and China
作者 吳崇涵;陳麒安
Wu, Charles Chong-han;Chen, Chi-an
貢獻者 國際事務學院
關鍵詞 避險; 夥伴關係戰略; 中韓關係; 美韓關係; 亞太地區
Hedging; Strategic partnership; China-ROK relations; US-ROK relations; Asia Pacific
日期 2022-06
上傳時間 20-Oct-2022 16:20:13 (UTC+8)
摘要 當美中兩大強權在東亞仍然維持既競爭又合作的態勢時,避險(hedging)遂成為亞太國家一個務實且富有彈性的外交政策選擇。本文認為,中國的「夥伴關係」外交在學理與實務上確實與傳統軍事聯盟存有差異。中國在後冷戰時期國際社會缺少意識形態對抗的背景下推動「夥伴關係」外交,透過改善對外關係而拉攏國際支持,進而使得周邊國家享有更多採取避險戰略的空間。南韓作為美國的亞太盟國,在美中之間的避險即為一項例證。本文認為,除非國際情勢與國際結構有明顯變化,短期之內中國應該不至於放棄「夥伴關係」外交。亞太國家也將會繼續採取避險戰略。
As the United States and China have remained the competition and cooperation in East Asia, hedging has become a pragmatic foreign policy object for the secondary states in the region. This article explores the differences between China’s “partnership” and traditional military alliances, attempting to explain the lack of a clear ideology in the post-Cold War era and its impacts on states’ hedging. Due to the strategy of “partnership” rather than the traditional military alliance, it has provided room for the surrounding countries’ hedging behavior. South Korea has represented one of the most appropriate hedging examples between Washington and Beijing. This study points out that unless there is a significant change in the international structure, China should not abandon its “partnership” strategy, which can explain why the risk aversion strategy is currently gaining more affirmation from the decision makers.
關聯 問題與研究, Vol.61, No.2, pp.1-49
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 國際事務學院
dc.creator (作者) 吳崇涵;陳麒安
dc.creator (作者) Wu, Charles Chong-han;Chen, Chi-an
dc.date (日期) 2022-06
dc.date.accessioned 20-Oct-2022 16:20:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 20-Oct-2022 16:20:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 20-Oct-2022 16:20:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142459-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 當美中兩大強權在東亞仍然維持既競爭又合作的態勢時,避險(hedging)遂成為亞太國家一個務實且富有彈性的外交政策選擇。本文認為,中國的「夥伴關係」外交在學理與實務上確實與傳統軍事聯盟存有差異。中國在後冷戰時期國際社會缺少意識形態對抗的背景下推動「夥伴關係」外交,透過改善對外關係而拉攏國際支持,進而使得周邊國家享有更多採取避險戰略的空間。南韓作為美國的亞太盟國,在美中之間的避險即為一項例證。本文認為,除非國際情勢與國際結構有明顯變化,短期之內中國應該不至於放棄「夥伴關係」外交。亞太國家也將會繼續採取避險戰略。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) As the United States and China have remained the competition and cooperation in East Asia, hedging has become a pragmatic foreign policy object for the secondary states in the region. This article explores the differences between China’s “partnership” and traditional military alliances, attempting to explain the lack of a clear ideology in the post-Cold War era and its impacts on states’ hedging. Due to the strategy of “partnership” rather than the traditional military alliance, it has provided room for the surrounding countries’ hedging behavior. South Korea has represented one of the most appropriate hedging examples between Washington and Beijing. This study points out that unless there is a significant change in the international structure, China should not abandon its “partnership” strategy, which can explain why the risk aversion strategy is currently gaining more affirmation from the decision makers.
dc.format.extent 147 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 問題與研究, Vol.61, No.2, pp.1-49
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 避險; 夥伴關係戰略; 中韓關係; 美韓關係; 亞太地區
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hedging; Strategic partnership; China-ROK relations; US-ROK relations; Asia Pacific
dc.title (題名) 南韓在美國與中國之間的避險戰略
dc.title (題名) South Korea`s Hedging Strategy between the United States and China
dc.type (資料類型) article