| dc.contributor | 哲學系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 蔡偉鼎 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2021-11 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2-Dec-2022 15:23:07 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 2-Dec-2022 15:23:07 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 2-Dec-2022 15:23:07 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142658 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 拉內（Karl Rahner）與海德格（Martin Heidegger）的思想間具有某種親緣關係。唯罕有學者專就這兩位思想家的艱澀哲學著作之思想親緣性進行系統性的研究，以致此一關係長久以來仍有很大部分未能獲得更進一步的釐清。拉內《在世精神》（Geist in Welt）一書中的海德格元素尤其難解。該書對多瑪斯知識論的詮釋乍看起來是個受到馬雷夏（Joseph Maréchal）影響下的產物，但我們也能讀到其字裡行間不時浮現出的一些具海德格色彩的表達方式。由於拉內並未在正文中針對其跟這兩位思想家的關係作出明確的說明，故令人實以難判定其思想究竟主要是以誰為師。本文試圖去梳理《在世精神》一書之基本主張及其背後的主導思想典範，並期能藉此對該議題做出一點初步的貢獻。為求順利達成此一任務，筆者首先將闡述拉內《在世精神》與其後續著作《聖言聽者》（Hörer des Wortes）間的內在關聯性，從而揭示出拉內宗教哲學思想之整體性。接著，將運用此一思想整體性作為參考架構來梳理拉內對多瑪斯《神學大全》（Summa Theologica）的一個知識論論題——即「返回影像」（conversion ad phantasma）學說——的詮釋。最後，則是通過比較分析拉內及馬雷夏對康德之上帝不可知論的不同回應方式來凸顯出海德格思想在《在世精神》所扮演的核心角色。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Karl Rahner`s thought is related to Martin Heidegger to some degree. However, only a few scholars have especially done systematic researches on the kinship of thoughts between the incomprehensible works of both thinkers. As a result, there are still many parts of their relationship that have not been further clarified for a long time. The Heideggerian element in Rahner`s Spirit in the World (Geist in Welt) is particularly difficult to identify. At first glance, Rahner`s interpretation of Aquinas` epistemology in this work seems to be an outcome under the influence of Joseph Maréchal, but we can also see some Heideggerian expressions appearing between the lines from time to time. Since Rahner did not make a clear explanation of his relationship with these two thinkers in the text, it is really difficult to determine whom his thoughts are mainly based on. This article attempts to clarify the basic assertions of Spirit of the World and the leading paradigm behind it, and aims to make some preliminary contributions to this topic. In order to achieve this task successfully, the author first explains the internal connection between Rahner`s Spirit of the World and his follow-up work Hearers of the Word (Hörer des Wortes), and thus reveals Rahner`s philosophy of religion as a whole. Then, he uses this wholeness of thought as a reference framework to sort out Rahner`s interpretation of Aquinas` epistemological question in Summa Theologica, the theory of conversio ad phantasma (return to the image). Finally, he highlights the central role played by Heidegger`s thought in Spirit in the World by comparing and analyzing different ways of response that Rahner and Maréchal put forward to Kant`s agnosticism. | |
| dc.format.extent | 154 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 哲學與文化, Vol.48, No.11, pp.47-65 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 拉內; 海德格; 馬雷夏; 多瑪斯; 康德; 在世精神; 聖言聽者 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Rahner; Heidegger; Maréchal; Aquinas; Kant; Spirit in the World; Hearers of the Word Rahner; Heidegger; Maréchal; Aquinas; Kant; Spirit in the World; Hearers of the Word; | |
| dc.title (題名) | 論《在世精神》的隱匿典範：馬雷夏或海德格？ | |
| dc.title (題名) | On the Hidden Paradigm in Spirit in the World: Maréchal or Heidegger? | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
