Publications-Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 文化哲學的模型--論文化類型學差異的語言世界觀相對性基礎
A Model of Cultural Philosophy - On the Basis of Linguistic Worldview Relativity in Cultural Typological Differences
作者 林遠澤
Lin, Yuan-Tse
貢獻者 政治大學哲學學報
關鍵詞 文化哲學; 民族心理學; 符號形式哲學; 內在語言形式; 語言相對性原則
philosophy of culture; ethnopsychology; philosophy of symbolic forms; intrinsic linguistic form; principle of linguistic relativity
日期 2023-01
上傳時間 6-Feb-2023 09:11:28 (UTC+8)
摘要 世界各民族的文化表現千差萬別,各種文化的表現型態對於人類自身發展的意義何在,應是一個非常值得哲學加以關注的議題。但很可惜的是,在目前有關文化哲學的研究領域、研究方法與理論基礎,卻都還缺乏明確的界定與奠基。本文雖沒有意圖要為此提出一種文化哲學的理論建構,但卻主張至少應先能為具有文化類型學差異的文化哲學研究,提出可能的理論研究模型與類型學差異之可區分性的基礎。為此之故,本文將以洪堡特的語言哲學為基礎,首先透過馮特的「民族心理學」與卡西勒的「符號形式哲學」,探討文化哲學至少應當包含有的三個問題層次及其相應的研究領域;其次,我將透過史坦塔爾對於「內在語言形式」與博厄斯等人對於「語言相對性原則」的研究,來說明吾人能對文化差異進行類型學區分的語言哲學基礎。以求最終能為中國文化的文化哲學研究,提供一個可能的開展方向。
The cultural expressions of the world’s peoples vary greatly, and the significance of various cultural expressions for human development should be a topic worthy of philosophical attention. Unfortunately, the field of study, research methods, and theoretical foundations of cultural philosophy are not clearly defined and grounded. Although this paper does not attempt to propose a theoretical construct for cultural philosophy, it does argue that at least a possible theoretical research model and a basis for typological differentiation of cultural philosophical research should be proposed first. For this reason, this paper will use Humboldt’s philosophy of language as a basis, firstly, to explore at least three theoretical levels of cultural philosophy and their corresponding fields of study through Wundt’s “ethnopsychology” and Cassirer’s “philosophy of symbolic forms”; secondly, through Steinthal’s study of “intrinsic linguistic forms” and Boasian study of “the principle of linguistic relativity”, I will illustrate the linguistic-philosophical basis on which we can make typological distinctions between cultural differences. The aim is to provide a possible direction for the philosophical study of Chinese culture.
關聯 政治大學哲學學報, 49, 135-165
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202301_(49).0004
dc.contributor 政治大學哲學學報-
dc.creator (作者) 林遠澤-
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Yuan-Tse-
dc.date (日期) 2023-01-
dc.date.accessioned 6-Feb-2023 09:11:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 6-Feb-2023 09:11:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 6-Feb-2023 09:11:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143236-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 世界各民族的文化表現千差萬別,各種文化的表現型態對於人類自身發展的意義何在,應是一個非常值得哲學加以關注的議題。但很可惜的是,在目前有關文化哲學的研究領域、研究方法與理論基礎,卻都還缺乏明確的界定與奠基。本文雖沒有意圖要為此提出一種文化哲學的理論建構,但卻主張至少應先能為具有文化類型學差異的文化哲學研究,提出可能的理論研究模型與類型學差異之可區分性的基礎。為此之故,本文將以洪堡特的語言哲學為基礎,首先透過馮特的「民族心理學」與卡西勒的「符號形式哲學」,探討文化哲學至少應當包含有的三個問題層次及其相應的研究領域;其次,我將透過史坦塔爾對於「內在語言形式」與博厄斯等人對於「語言相對性原則」的研究,來說明吾人能對文化差異進行類型學區分的語言哲學基礎。以求最終能為中國文化的文化哲學研究,提供一個可能的開展方向。-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The cultural expressions of the world’s peoples vary greatly, and the significance of various cultural expressions for human development should be a topic worthy of philosophical attention. Unfortunately, the field of study, research methods, and theoretical foundations of cultural philosophy are not clearly defined and grounded. Although this paper does not attempt to propose a theoretical construct for cultural philosophy, it does argue that at least a possible theoretical research model and a basis for typological differentiation of cultural philosophical research should be proposed first. For this reason, this paper will use Humboldt’s philosophy of language as a basis, firstly, to explore at least three theoretical levels of cultural philosophy and their corresponding fields of study through Wundt’s “ethnopsychology” and Cassirer’s “philosophy of symbolic forms”; secondly, through Steinthal’s study of “intrinsic linguistic forms” and Boasian study of “the principle of linguistic relativity”, I will illustrate the linguistic-philosophical basis on which we can make typological distinctions between cultural differences. The aim is to provide a possible direction for the philosophical study of Chinese culture.-
dc.format.extent 861196 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 政治大學哲學學報, 49, 135-165-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文化哲學; 民族心理學; 符號形式哲學; 內在語言形式; 語言相對性原則-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) philosophy of culture; ethnopsychology; philosophy of symbolic forms; intrinsic linguistic form; principle of linguistic relativity-
dc.title (題名) 文化哲學的模型--論文化類型學差異的語言世界觀相對性基礎-
dc.title (題名) A Model of Cultural Philosophy - On the Basis of Linguistic Worldview Relativity in Cultural Typological Differences-
dc.type (資料類型) article-
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.30393/TNCUP.202301_(49).0004-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202301_(49).0004-