學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 成為寶可夢大師：深媒介化時代的遊戲與想像研究
To Become a Pokémon Master: A Phenomenological Investigation of Gameplay and Imagination in the Age of Deep Mediatization作者 賴麒全
Lai, Chi-Chuan貢獻者 劉慧雯
Liu, Hui-Wen
賴麒全
Lai, Chi-Chuan關鍵詞 現象學
想像
幻覺
深媒介化
嬉戲化
遊戲社會
Phenomenology
Imagination
Illusion
Deep mediatization
Ludification
Ludic society日期 2023 上傳時間 9-Mar-2023 18:39:17 (UTC+8) 摘要 遊戲設計師Eric Zimmerman 於2013年發表的〈遊戲世紀宣言〉從遊戲（game）的角度描繪了21世紀社會文化的樣貌，但他的文章並未著墨數位科技/媒介如何讓遊戲成為描繪當代社會文化的最佳比方，關於遊戲的想法也並未真正注意到嬉戲（play）的深層涵義。有鑑於此，本研究的研究目的為重寫〈遊戲世紀宣言〉，以深媒介化（deep mediatization）為主要觀點，進行三個章節的現象學思考，最後撰寫一則〈遊戲社會宣言〉（Manifesto for a Ludic Society）。本文以精靈寶可夢系列遊戲為例，先從想像（imagination）的角度解明定義深媒介化時代的媒介流形（media manifold）概念中，跨媒介實踐如何在人的意識活動中發生，並且推論媒介流形的媒介存有狀態具有高達美藝術作品存有論的嬉戲特徵。隨後以Pokémon GO田野經驗中「否定他人玩法」的觀察為指引，從幻覺（illusions）的角度探討深媒介化情境中人群共在的互卸性（interpassivity）邏輯，描繪在社會前方冠上遊戲特徵（ludic）的人群面貌。最後由素養（literacies）問題出發，以遊戲社會為視角討論2020總統大選時的嬉戲因素，從中延伸出嬉戲精神作為深媒介化時代素養理想面貌的啟示。文末，總結三個章節的現象學思考成果呈現〈遊戲社會宣言〉，並且與媒介化研究、遊戲研究進行對話。這篇論文的作者也從寶可夢的經驗現象和相關理論思索中成為了寶可夢碩士（Pokémon Master）。
Eric Zimmerman, a game designer, launched a “Manifesto for a Ludic Century” in 2013. In the article, he used games to describe cultures in the 21st century but failed to address how digital technologies contribute to such a relevance. Also, he didn’t unveil the meaning of play in depth. In light of this, the present study aims to re-write Zimmerman’s article by conducting three passages of phenomenological investigation based on the theory of deep mediatization.Drawing on my life experiences of consuming Pocket Monster series products and fieldworks in Pokémon GO, I discuss both imagination and illusions with an awareness of deep mediatization. Firstly, I suggest that media manifold relates to Gadamer’s concept of play in an ontological sense. Secondly, I reveal that the social logic in a gaming situation is interpassivity instead of interactivity. Adopting the perspectives developed ahead, I conduct an observation concerning literacy in the context of Taiwan’s 2020 presidential election. Play spirit is a guidance for living in the Ludic Society.At the end of the study, “Manifesto for a Ludic Society” is presented. The author becomes a Pokémon Master after completing this thesis.參考文獻 方念萱（2016）。《媒介化、行動化：媒介化理論與行動者網絡理論的對話》。〈傳播文化與政治〉，4：p55-83。方念萱（2020）。〈導言： 媒介已成為動詞〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 3-7。成窮 [譯]（2013）。《遊戲人：對文化中遊戲因素的研究》台北：康德出版社。（原書J. Huizinga. [1938]. Homo Ludens. A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Nederland: Random House）何欣潔、陳莉雅、趙安平（2019）。〈亡國感的戰爭〉。端傳媒，取自（上網日期：2022/11/27）：https://theinitium.com/project/20191209-taiwan-2020-election/何欣潔、陳莉雅（2019）。〈亡國感的前世今生：在台灣，兩種「國」的故事〉。端傳媒，取自（上網日期：2022/11/27）：https://theinitium.com/article/20191210-taiwan-election-2020/林宇玲（ 2010 ），超越召喚：線上遊戲的快感從Žižek的觀點解析線上遊戲的意識型態運作，《資訊社會研究》，頁245-274邢雁冰（2022）。《中國社會的感知結構研究(1988-2008): 媒介化取徑》。台北：世新大學傳播博士學位學程博士論文。吳亞儒（2015）。《日本動畫產業跨媒體經營模式之研究》。台北：國立政治大學日本研究碩士學位學程碩士論文。岡田斗司夫（1996）。《オタク学入門》。東京：太田出版。汪耀進、劉俐[譯]（2010）。《戀人絮語》。台北：商周出版 。（原書Barthes. R. (1977). Fragments d`un discours amoureux.）林明德（2003）。《日本史》。台北：三民。林志明[譯] （2018）。《物體系》。台北：麥田。原書：Baudrillard, J. (1966). Le système des objets. Paris: Gallimard.李御寧（2008）。《日本人的縮小意識：豆物狂的傳奇》。台北：漫遊者文化。李維倫[譯]（2004）。《現象學十四講》。台北：心靈工坊出版社。（原書Sokolowski, R. [2000]. Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge university press.）柯籙晏（2014）。《中介化審美經驗怎麼研究？打造一個實用主義符號學的分析與詮釋架構》。台北：國立政治大學新聞學系博士論文。柯籙晏（2020）。〈邁向展演—作品—閱聽的閱聽人研究典範：從缺席事件的訊息效果談起〉。《傳播研究與實踐》，10 : 79-107。唐士哲（2014a）。〈重構媒介？「中介」與「媒介化」概念耙梳〉，《新聞學研究》，121: 1-39。唐士哲（2014b）。〈從政治化媒介到媒介化政治：電視政論節目作為制度化的政治實踐〉，《中華傳播學刊》，25：3-41。唐樂水（2018）。《嘻哈中國：媒介化視野下的次文化研究》。台北：世新大學傳播博士學位學程博士論文。唐樂水（2020）。〈當媒介化遇到次文化： 一種歷時性研究的思路〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 99-138。曹琬凌（2016）。《守住泰雅的聲音：司馬庫斯的媒介化故事》。台北：世新大學傳播博士學位學程博士論文。曹琬凌（2020）。〈媒介化與跨媒介敘事想像： #MeToo如何交織故事世界〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 49-97。曹琬凌（2021）。〈紀錄片的時間政治：《老鷹想飛》的媒介化故事效應〉，《新聞學研究》，147: 101-149。張玉佩（2013）。〈穿梭虛擬世界的遊戲少年：他∕她們的社會資本之累積與轉換〉，《中華傳播學刊》23:195-227。張敦為（2009）。《Norbert Elias 的文明理論——文明化、個體化、知識化的形態與過程》。新竹市：國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。張郁敏（2015）。〈跨世代行動上網與電視並用行為與動機〉。《新聞學研究》124, 83-116。張盈堃（2016）。〈可愛與奇幻性：日本玩具成功影響全球的重要元素〉。關鍵評論網，取自（上網日期2020/8/18）：https://www.thenewslens.com/article/38385陳品丞（2019）。《社會運動的媒介化: 一個行動者網絡理論的觀點與取徑》。台北：國立政治大學傳播碩士學位學程論文。陳品丞（2020）。〈從二元本體論到行動本體論： 媒介化的行動者網絡理論轉向與實作〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 9-47。陳怡瑾（2010）。《Philippe Aries《童年世紀》童年論述之研究》。台北：臺北市立教育大學教育學系碩士論文。褚炫初 [譯]（2012）。《動物化的後現代：御宅族如何影響日本社會》。台北：大藝出版 （ 原書：東浩紀(2001)。動物化するポストモダン──オタクから見た日本社會。東京：講談社。）黃宏文（2017）。〈譯注者導讀〉。《現象學的觀念》，von Edmund Husserl [著]、黃宏文[譯注]。新竹：國立清華大學出版社。黃宏文 [譯注]（2017）。《現象學的觀念》，von Edmund Husserl [著]、黃宏文[譯注]。新竹：國立清華大學出版社。（原書Husserl, E. [1950]. Die Idee der Phänomenologie: fünf vorlesungen.）黃冠華（2015）。〈一個矛盾的網路主體： 能述、幻想、互卸〉。《中華傳播學刊》27: 203-226黃厚銘（2017）。《「真實」的復歸：擴增實境遊戲Ingress社會文化意義之分析》。《考古人類學刊》 86: 43-68。黃厚銘（2019）。〈擴增實境遊戲Pokémon GO的流動性：遊戲機制、文化與變遷〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，（總）第47 期：233–263。黃厚銘、林日璇、林鶴玲（2021）。〈遊戲研究〉。《中華傳播學刊》40:115-142黃順星（2020）。〈媒社區： 以媒介化理論檢視臺灣社區報發展〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 139-176。黃秋鳳[譯]（2018）。《圖解江戶時代》。台北：易博士出版社。 （原書：河合敦（2009）。《早わかり江戸時代》。東京：日本実業出版社。）黃錦容, 黃文宏, 內田康 [譯注] （2009）。《「粹」的構造》。新北：聯經出版公司 。（原書：九鬼周造 (1930)。いきの構造。）賴玉釵（2018）。〈奇幻經典之跨媒介網絡建構及敘事策略初探：以《哈利波特》故事網絡為例〉。《新聞學研究》137: 133-183。鄭義愷 [譯]（2013）。《消失的現代性：全球化的文化向度》。台北：群學。（原書Appadurai, A. [1996]. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. U of Minnesota Press.）劉忠博、冼楚橋（2022）。〈媒介化理論與政治經濟學的思考對話：以學術傳播的媒介化為考察場域〉。《傳播文化與政治》15:113-137。劉慧雯（2015）。《從媒體素養到新素養：試論教學策略與認識論的轉變》。〈 中華傳播學刊〉27, pp.67-98。劉慧雯（2017）。〈建構「倫理閱聽人」：試論社群媒體使用者的理論意涵〉。《新聞學研究》131, pp.87-125。蕭昭君[譯]（2007）。《童年的消逝》。台北：遠流出版。（原書Postman, N. (1997). The Disappearance of Childhood. Vintage/Random House）藍佩嘉 （2015）。〈「童年」的社會學分析：從國家主人翁到消費福利主體〉。巷仔口社會學，取自（上網日期2020/8/7）：https://twstreetcorner.org/2015/04/04/lanpeichia-2/蘇威任[譯]（2016）。《什麼是遊戲》。台北：開學文化。（原書S. Chauvier [2007]. Qu’est-ce qu’un jeu. Paris: Vrin）Allison, A. (2006). Millennial monsters: Japanese toys and the global imagination. Univ of California Press.Woodcock, J., & Johnson, M. R. (2018). Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 542-558.Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic books.Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.Andersen, J. (2018). Archiving, ordering, and searching: search engines, algorithms, databases, and deep mediatization. Media, Culture & Society, 40(8), 1135-1150.Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press ;Blackwell.Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan press.Baudrillard, J. (2001). Beyond use value. in Consumption: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences, 169-179.Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10.Brough, J. B. (2005). Edmund Husserl, Collected Works, vol. 11, Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory, 1898–1925.Bogost, I. (2015). Why Gamification Is Bullshit. In Walz, S. P., Deterding, S. (Eds.), (pp. 65–79). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Bouça, M. (2012). Mobile communication, gamification and ludification. MindTrek 2012. DOI:10.1145/2393132.2393197Bourdon, J., & Balbi, G. (2021). Questioning (Deep) Mediatization: A Historical and Anthropological Critique. International Journal of Communication, 15, 20.Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play, and games. (M. Barash, Trans.). New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Castells, M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 1. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Chaplin, H. (2013/09/13). Will The 21st Century Be Defined by Games? Available on (Retrieved: 2019/10/22): https://kotaku.com/will-the-21st-century-be-defined-by-games-1293867009Chang, Y. (2017). The influence of media multitasking on the impulse to buy: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior 70: 60-66Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity.Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23, 191-202.Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. John Wiley & Sons.DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society. London: Continuum International PublishingDeacon, D. & Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon? Media, Culture & Society, 36(7),1032-1044.Deacon, D. & Stanyer, J. (2015). ‘Mediatization and’ or ‘Mediatization of’? A response to Hepp et al., Media, Culture & Society, 37(4),655-657.Dyer, J. (2014). Compassionate Play in The Ludic Century. Press Start 1 (1), 21-36Ekström, M., Fornäs, J., Jansson, A., & Jerslev, A. (2016). Three tasks for mediatization research: Contributions to an open agenda. Media, Culture & Society, 38(7), 1090-1108.Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? London: Hutchinson. （中譯本 : 鄭義愷[譯]（2007）。《什麼是社會學》。台北：國立編譯館與學群出版。）Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J. H., & Tosca, S. P. (2020). Understanding video games: The essential introduction. London: Routledge.Finnemann, N. O. (2014). Digitization: New trajectories of mediatization? In Kunt Lundby ed. Handbook of communication science vol. 21: Mediatization of Communication. P297-p321Frissen, V., Lammes, S., de Lange, M., de Mul, J., & Raessens, J. (Eds.). (2015). Playful identities: The ludification of digital media cultures. Amsterdam University Press.Gillespie, T. (2014). The Relevance of Algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality and society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge: MIT Press.Gekker, A. (2012). Gamocracy: Political communication in the age of play. Master’s Theses, Faculty of Humanities in Utrecht University, Netherlands.Hasebrink, U., & Domeyer, H. (2012). Media repertoires as patterns of behaviour and as meaningful practices: A multimethod approach to media use in converging media environments. Participations, 9(2), 757-779.Hasebrink, U.; Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications 31 (3), 369-387.Hepp, A. (2012). Cultures of mediatization. John Wiley & Sons.Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of Mediatization. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.Hepp, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2014). Human interaction and communicative figurations: The transformation of mediatized cultures and societies. Mediatization of communication, 249-272.Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2),314-324.Hepp, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2018). Researching transforming communications in times of deep mediatization: A figurational approach. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink, (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming communications in times of deep mediatization, pp. 15-48. The Palgrave Macmillan.Hepp, A. (2020). Deep mediatization. Routledge.Hoskins, A. (2014): The Mediatization of Memory. In Lundby, K. (Ed). Handbook of communication science vol. 29: Mediatization of Communication. P661-p679Thacker, D. C. & Webb, J. (2002). Introducing Children’s Literature: from romanticism to postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge. （楊雅捷、林盈蕙[譯] （2005）。《兒童文學導論：從浪漫主義到後現代主義》。台北：天衛文化。）Tomaz, T. (2018). Algorithms and Digital Media: Measurement and Control in the Mathematical Projection of the Real. In Thimm, C., Anastasiadis, M., Einspänner-Pflock, J. (Eds.) Media Logic(s) Revisited. Modelling the Interplay between Media Institutions, Media Technology and Societal Change, pp 265-286Jansen, J. (2016). Husserl. In The Routledge handbook of philosophy of imagination (pp. 89-101). Routledge.Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 203-222.Kearney, R. (1998). Poetics of imagining: Modern to post-modern (No. 6). Fordham Univ Press.Keightley, E. (2012). Time, Media and Modernity. Palgrave Macmillan UKKlein, J., Walter, M. Schimank, U. (2018). Ch 15 Researching individual`s media repertoirs: Challenges of qualitative interviews on cross-media practices. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink, (Ed)., Communicative Figurations: Transforming communications in times of deep mediatization, The Palgrave Macmillan.Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of ‘mediatization’ as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication 2007, 3: 256-260Krotz, F., & Hepp, A. (2013). A concretization of mediatization: How mediatization works and why ‘mediatized worlds’ are a helpful concept for empirical mediatization research. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3(2), 119-134.Krotz, F. (2014). Mediatization as a mover in modernity: social and cultural change in the context of media change. In Lundby, K. (eds.), Handbook of communication science vol. 21: Mediatization of Communication. p131-p161Krotz, F. (2018). Media Logic and the Mediatization Approach: A Good Partnership, a Mesalliance, or a Misunderstanding? In Thimm, C., Anastasiadis, M., Einspänner-Pflock, J. (Eds.) Media Logic(s) Revisited. Modelling the Interplay between Media Institutions, Media Technology and Societal Change, pp 41-61Kuipers, G. (2018). Communicative Figurations: Towards a New Paradigm for the Media Age? In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink, (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming communications in times of deep mediatization, pp. 425-436. The Palgrave Macmillan.Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Larsen, L. J. (2019). Play and Gameful Movies: The Ludification of Modern Cinema. Games and Culture,14(5), 455–477.Livingstone, S. (2009). On the mediation of everything: ICA presidential address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59 (1). pp. 1-18.Livingstone, S. & Lunt, P. (2014). Mediatization: an emerging paradigm for media and communication studies. In Lundby, K. eds. Handbook of communication science vol. 21: Mediatization of Communication. P703-p724Lohmeier, C., & Böhling, R. (2018). Researching communicative figurations: Necessities and challenges for empirical research. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink, (Ed)., Communicative Figurations (pp. 343-362). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.Lohmeier, C., Kaun, A., & Pentzold, C. (2020). Making time in digital societies: Considering the interplay of media, data, and temporalities—An introduction to the special issue. New Media & Society, 22(9), 1521-1527.Lunt, P. & Livingstone, S. (2016). Is ‘mediatization’ the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 462-470.Mäyrä, F. (2017). Pokémon GO: Entering the Ludic Society. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916678270Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York, London, New Delhi and Sydney: Bloomsbury.Matherne, S. (2016). Kant`s theory of the imagination. In The Routledge handbook of philosophy of imagination (pp. 55-68). Routledge.Nim, E. G. (2021). Deep Mediatization: Rethinking a Figurational Approach. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 26(4), 664-671.Pentzold (2018). Between moments and millennia: temporalising mediatization. Media, Culture & Society. 40(6), 927-937Pfaller, R. (2014). On the pleasure principle in culture: Illusions without owners. Verso Books.Rheingold, H,(1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. MA: Addison‐Wesley.[Online]. Available(retrieved on 2022/12/26): http://www.well.com/user/hlr/vcbook/index.htmlRosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.Schütz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world, 2 volumes. Evanston: Northwestern UPStein, A. (2013/09/17). The Uncomfortable Politics of the “Ludic Century”. Available on (Retrieved: 2019/10/22): https://killscreen.com/articles/uncomfortable-politics-ludic-century/van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & society, 12(2), 197-208.Wang, G. (2018). Media Communication Research in the Digital Era: Moving Beyond Ontological Dualism. Communication Theory, 28(3): 235–253.Walther, B. K. (2013). Playing and gaming. Game Studies, 3(1), 1-20.Walz, S. P., Deterding, S. (2015), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Zimmerman, E. (2015). Manifesto for a ludic century. In Walz, S. P., Deterding, S. (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 19–22). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Originally posted on KOTAKU. Available on: https://kotaku.com/manifesto-the-21st-century-will-be-defined-by-games-1275355204)Zimmerman, E. (2013/09/12). What’s wrong with the Ludic Century? Available on (Retrieved: 2019/10/22): https://ericzimmerman.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/whats-wrong-with-the-ludic-century/ 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
105461010資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105461010 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 劉慧雯 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Liu, Hui-Wen en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 賴麒全 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lai, Chi-Chuan en_US dc.creator (作者) 賴麒全 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lai, Chi-Chuan en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 9-Mar-2023 18:39:17 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 9-Mar-2023 18:39:17 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Mar-2023 18:39:17 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0105461010 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143844 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 105461010 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 遊戲設計師Eric Zimmerman 於2013年發表的〈遊戲世紀宣言〉從遊戲（game）的角度描繪了21世紀社會文化的樣貌，但他的文章並未著墨數位科技/媒介如何讓遊戲成為描繪當代社會文化的最佳比方，關於遊戲的想法也並未真正注意到嬉戲（play）的深層涵義。有鑑於此，本研究的研究目的為重寫〈遊戲世紀宣言〉，以深媒介化（deep mediatization）為主要觀點，進行三個章節的現象學思考，最後撰寫一則〈遊戲社會宣言〉（Manifesto for a Ludic Society）。本文以精靈寶可夢系列遊戲為例，先從想像（imagination）的角度解明定義深媒介化時代的媒介流形（media manifold）概念中，跨媒介實踐如何在人的意識活動中發生，並且推論媒介流形的媒介存有狀態具有高達美藝術作品存有論的嬉戲特徵。隨後以Pokémon GO田野經驗中「否定他人玩法」的觀察為指引，從幻覺（illusions）的角度探討深媒介化情境中人群共在的互卸性（interpassivity）邏輯，描繪在社會前方冠上遊戲特徵（ludic）的人群面貌。最後由素養（literacies）問題出發，以遊戲社會為視角討論2020總統大選時的嬉戲因素，從中延伸出嬉戲精神作為深媒介化時代素養理想面貌的啟示。文末，總結三個章節的現象學思考成果呈現〈遊戲社會宣言〉，並且與媒介化研究、遊戲研究進行對話。這篇論文的作者也從寶可夢的經驗現象和相關理論思索中成為了寶可夢碩士（Pokémon Master）。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Eric Zimmerman, a game designer, launched a “Manifesto for a Ludic Century” in 2013. In the article, he used games to describe cultures in the 21st century but failed to address how digital technologies contribute to such a relevance. Also, he didn’t unveil the meaning of play in depth. In light of this, the present study aims to re-write Zimmerman’s article by conducting three passages of phenomenological investigation based on the theory of deep mediatization.Drawing on my life experiences of consuming Pocket Monster series products and fieldworks in Pokémon GO, I discuss both imagination and illusions with an awareness of deep mediatization. Firstly, I suggest that media manifold relates to Gadamer’s concept of play in an ontological sense. Secondly, I reveal that the social logic in a gaming situation is interpassivity instead of interactivity. Adopting the perspectives developed ahead, I conduct an observation concerning literacy in the context of Taiwan’s 2020 presidential election. Play spirit is a guidance for living in the Ludic Society.At the end of the study, “Manifesto for a Ludic Society” is presented. The author becomes a Pokémon Master after completing this thesis. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論：21世紀是遊戲的世紀？ 6第一節 進入深媒介化時代 7一、從媒介化到深媒介化 8二、傳播形定與日常生活 12第二節 朝向〈遊戲社會宣言〉 15一、遊戲化與嬉戲化：遊戲如何影響社會文化？ 15二、研究嬉戲化（ludification）：轉而探討「想像」與「幻覺」 20第三節 成為寶可夢大師：「我」的現象學旅程 25一、架設現象學場域 25二、問題意識與章節安排 29第二章 跨媒介及其想像實踐 31第一節 理解精靈寶可夢的「可愛」 32第二節 童年與消費：「我」的兩段生命故事 40一、1999-2005：童年的和解 42二、2016-2019：厭世的出口 44第三節 從圖像意識解明媒介之「跨」 47第四節 小結：在媒介流形中被嬉戲玩 50第三章 一起嬉戲的幻覺 54第一節 「否定」他人玩法的嬉戲實踐 54第二節 一起玩？系統中的互卸性 57一、田野書寫：他們在玩什麼？ 57二、理論討論：人群共在的互卸性邏輯 64第三節 不認真玩的嬉戲精神 65一、田野書寫：我在玩什麼？ 65二、理論討論：嬉戲精神中的含混性 69第四節 小結：遊戲社會的面貌 70第四章 遊戲社會的素養問題 71第一節 批判的媒體識讀之後 72第二節 描繪2020總統大選的傳播形定 73一、相關性框架：芒果乾與它的產地 73二、行動者雲集：兩大黨對抗的遊戲 74三、傳播實踐：互動中的角色扮演遊戲 78第三節 選舉像遊戲？此話怎解 85第四節 小結：嬉戲的素養意涵 86第五章 結語：寶可夢大師的遊戲社會宣言 87第一節 遊戲社會宣言 87第二節 研究反思 89一、回應媒介化研究 89二、回應遊戲研究 91第三節 結語 92參考文獻 93 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2661340 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105461010 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 現象學 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 想像 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 幻覺 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 深媒介化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 嬉戲化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 遊戲社會 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Phenomenology en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Imagination en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Illusion en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Deep mediatization en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ludification en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ludic society en_US dc.title (題名) 成為寶可夢大師：深媒介化時代的遊戲與想像研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) To Become a Pokémon Master: A Phenomenological Investigation of Gameplay and Imagination in the Age of Deep Mediatization en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 方念萱（2016）。《媒介化、行動化：媒介化理論與行動者網絡理論的對話》。〈傳播文化與政治〉，4：p55-83。方念萱（2020）。〈導言： 媒介已成為動詞〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 3-7。成窮 [譯]（2013）。《遊戲人：對文化中遊戲因素的研究》台北：康德出版社。（原書J. Huizinga. [1938]. Homo Ludens. A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Nederland: Random House）何欣潔、陳莉雅、趙安平（2019）。〈亡國感的戰爭〉。端傳媒，取自（上網日期：2022/11/27）：https://theinitium.com/project/20191209-taiwan-2020-election/何欣潔、陳莉雅（2019）。〈亡國感的前世今生：在台灣，兩種「國」的故事〉。端傳媒，取自（上網日期：2022/11/27）：https://theinitium.com/article/20191210-taiwan-election-2020/林宇玲（ 2010 ），超越召喚：線上遊戲的快感從Žižek的觀點解析線上遊戲的意識型態運作，《資訊社會研究》，頁245-274邢雁冰（2022）。《中國社會的感知結構研究(1988-2008): 媒介化取徑》。台北：世新大學傳播博士學位學程博士論文。吳亞儒（2015）。《日本動畫產業跨媒體經營模式之研究》。台北：國立政治大學日本研究碩士學位學程碩士論文。岡田斗司夫（1996）。《オタク学入門》。東京：太田出版。汪耀進、劉俐[譯]（2010）。《戀人絮語》。台北：商周出版 。（原書Barthes. R. (1977). Fragments d`un discours amoureux.）林明德（2003）。《日本史》。台北：三民。林志明[譯] （2018）。《物體系》。台北：麥田。原書：Baudrillard, J. (1966). Le système des objets. Paris: Gallimard.李御寧（2008）。《日本人的縮小意識：豆物狂的傳奇》。台北：漫遊者文化。李維倫[譯]（2004）。《現象學十四講》。台北：心靈工坊出版社。（原書Sokolowski, R. [2000]. Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge university press.）柯籙晏（2014）。《中介化審美經驗怎麼研究？打造一個實用主義符號學的分析與詮釋架構》。台北：國立政治大學新聞學系博士論文。柯籙晏（2020）。〈邁向展演—作品—閱聽的閱聽人研究典範：從缺席事件的訊息效果談起〉。《傳播研究與實踐》，10 : 79-107。唐士哲（2014a）。〈重構媒介？「中介」與「媒介化」概念耙梳〉，《新聞學研究》，121: 1-39。唐士哲（2014b）。〈從政治化媒介到媒介化政治：電視政論節目作為制度化的政治實踐〉，《中華傳播學刊》，25：3-41。唐樂水（2018）。《嘻哈中國：媒介化視野下的次文化研究》。台北：世新大學傳播博士學位學程博士論文。唐樂水（2020）。〈當媒介化遇到次文化： 一種歷時性研究的思路〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 99-138。曹琬凌（2016）。《守住泰雅的聲音：司馬庫斯的媒介化故事》。台北：世新大學傳播博士學位學程博士論文。曹琬凌（2020）。〈媒介化與跨媒介敘事想像： #MeToo如何交織故事世界〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 49-97。曹琬凌（2021）。〈紀錄片的時間政治：《老鷹想飛》的媒介化故事效應〉，《新聞學研究》，147: 101-149。張玉佩（2013）。〈穿梭虛擬世界的遊戲少年：他∕她們的社會資本之累積與轉換〉，《中華傳播學刊》23:195-227。張敦為（2009）。《Norbert Elias 的文明理論——文明化、個體化、知識化的形態與過程》。新竹市：國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。張郁敏（2015）。〈跨世代行動上網與電視並用行為與動機〉。《新聞學研究》124, 83-116。張盈堃（2016）。〈可愛與奇幻性：日本玩具成功影響全球的重要元素〉。關鍵評論網，取自（上網日期2020/8/18）：https://www.thenewslens.com/article/38385陳品丞（2019）。《社會運動的媒介化: 一個行動者網絡理論的觀點與取徑》。台北：國立政治大學傳播碩士學位學程論文。陳品丞（2020）。〈從二元本體論到行動本體論： 媒介化的行動者網絡理論轉向與實作〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 9-47。陳怡瑾（2010）。《Philippe Aries《童年世紀》童年論述之研究》。台北：臺北市立教育大學教育學系碩士論文。褚炫初 [譯]（2012）。《動物化的後現代：御宅族如何影響日本社會》。台北：大藝出版 （ 原書：東浩紀(2001)。動物化するポストモダン──オタクから見た日本社會。東京：講談社。）黃宏文（2017）。〈譯注者導讀〉。《現象學的觀念》，von Edmund Husserl [著]、黃宏文[譯注]。新竹：國立清華大學出版社。黃宏文 [譯注]（2017）。《現象學的觀念》，von Edmund Husserl [著]、黃宏文[譯注]。新竹：國立清華大學出版社。（原書Husserl, E. [1950]. Die Idee der Phänomenologie: fünf vorlesungen.）黃冠華（2015）。〈一個矛盾的網路主體： 能述、幻想、互卸〉。《中華傳播學刊》27: 203-226黃厚銘（2017）。《「真實」的復歸：擴增實境遊戲Ingress社會文化意義之分析》。《考古人類學刊》 86: 43-68。黃厚銘（2019）。〈擴增實境遊戲Pokémon GO的流動性：遊戲機制、文化與變遷〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，（總）第47 期：233–263。黃厚銘、林日璇、林鶴玲（2021）。〈遊戲研究〉。《中華傳播學刊》40:115-142黃順星（2020）。〈媒社區： 以媒介化理論檢視臺灣社區報發展〉。《中華傳播學刊》38: 139-176。黃秋鳳[譯]（2018）。《圖解江戶時代》。台北：易博士出版社。 （原書：河合敦（2009）。《早わかり江戸時代》。東京：日本実業出版社。）黃錦容, 黃文宏, 內田康 [譯注] （2009）。《「粹」的構造》。新北：聯經出版公司 。（原書：九鬼周造 (1930)。いきの構造。）賴玉釵（2018）。〈奇幻經典之跨媒介網絡建構及敘事策略初探：以《哈利波特》故事網絡為例〉。《新聞學研究》137: 133-183。鄭義愷 [譯]（2013）。《消失的現代性：全球化的文化向度》。台北：群學。（原書Appadurai, A. [1996]. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. U of Minnesota Press.）劉忠博、冼楚橋（2022）。〈媒介化理論與政治經濟學的思考對話：以學術傳播的媒介化為考察場域〉。《傳播文化與政治》15:113-137。劉慧雯（2015）。《從媒體素養到新素養：試論教學策略與認識論的轉變》。〈 中華傳播學刊〉27, pp.67-98。劉慧雯（2017）。〈建構「倫理閱聽人」：試論社群媒體使用者的理論意涵〉。《新聞學研究》131, pp.87-125。蕭昭君[譯]（2007）。《童年的消逝》。台北：遠流出版。（原書Postman, N. (1997). The Disappearance of Childhood. Vintage/Random House）藍佩嘉 （2015）。〈「童年」的社會學分析：從國家主人翁到消費福利主體〉。巷仔口社會學，取自（上網日期2020/8/7）：https://twstreetcorner.org/2015/04/04/lanpeichia-2/蘇威任[譯]（2016）。《什麼是遊戲》。台北：開學文化。（原書S. Chauvier [2007]. Qu’est-ce qu’un jeu. Paris: Vrin）Allison, A. (2006). Millennial monsters: Japanese toys and the global imagination. Univ of California Press.Woodcock, J., & Johnson, M. R. (2018). Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 542-558.Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic books.Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.Andersen, J. (2018). Archiving, ordering, and searching: search engines, algorithms, databases, and deep mediatization. Media, Culture & Society, 40(8), 1135-1150.Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press ;Blackwell.Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan press.Baudrillard, J. (2001). Beyond use value. in Consumption: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences, 169-179.Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10.Brough, J. B. (2005). Edmund Husserl, Collected Works, vol. 11, Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory, 1898–1925.Bogost, I. (2015). Why Gamification Is Bullshit. In Walz, S. P., Deterding, S. (Eds.), (pp. 65–79). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Bouça, M. (2012). Mobile communication, gamification and ludification. MindTrek 2012. DOI:10.1145/2393132.2393197Bourdon, J., & Balbi, G. (2021). Questioning (Deep) Mediatization: A Historical and Anthropological Critique. International Journal of Communication, 15, 20.Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play, and games. (M. Barash, Trans.). New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Castells, M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 1. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Chaplin, H. (2013/09/13). Will The 21st Century Be Defined by Games? Available on (Retrieved: 2019/10/22): https://kotaku.com/will-the-21st-century-be-defined-by-games-1293867009Chang, Y. (2017). The influence of media multitasking on the impulse to buy: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior 70: 60-66Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity.Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23, 191-202.Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. John Wiley & Sons.DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society. London: Continuum International PublishingDeacon, D. & Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon? Media, Culture & Society, 36(7),1032-1044.Deacon, D. & Stanyer, J. (2015). ‘Mediatization and’ or ‘Mediatization of’? A response to Hepp et al., Media, Culture & Society, 37(4),655-657.Dyer, J. (2014). Compassionate Play in The Ludic Century. Press Start 1 (1), 21-36Ekström, M., Fornäs, J., Jansson, A., & Jerslev, A. (2016). Three tasks for mediatization research: Contributions to an open agenda. Media, Culture & Society, 38(7), 1090-1108.Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? London: Hutchinson. （中譯本 : 鄭義愷[譯]（2007）。《什麼是社會學》。台北：國立編譯館與學群出版。）Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J. H., & Tosca, S. P. (2020). Understanding video games: The essential introduction. London: Routledge.Finnemann, N. O. (2014). Digitization: New trajectories of mediatization? In Kunt Lundby ed. Handbook of communication science vol. 21: Mediatization of Communication. P297-p321Frissen, V., Lammes, S., de Lange, M., de Mul, J., & Raessens, J. (Eds.). (2015). Playful identities: The ludification of digital media cultures. Amsterdam University Press.Gillespie, T. (2014). The Relevance of Algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality and society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge: MIT Press.Gekker, A. (2012). Gamocracy: Political communication in the age of play. Master’s Theses, Faculty of Humanities in Utrecht University, Netherlands.Hasebrink, U., & Domeyer, H. (2012). Media repertoires as patterns of behaviour and as meaningful practices: A multimethod approach to media use in converging media environments. Participations, 9(2), 757-779.Hasebrink, U.; Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications 31 (3), 369-387.Hepp, A. (2012). Cultures of mediatization. John Wiley & Sons.Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of Mediatization. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.Hepp, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2014). Human interaction and communicative figurations: The transformation of mediatized cultures and societies. Mediatization of communication, 249-272.Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2),314-324.Hepp, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2018). Researching transforming communications in times of deep mediatization: A figurational approach. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink, (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming communications in times of deep mediatization, pp. 15-48. The Palgrave Macmillan.Hepp, A. (2020). Deep mediatization. Routledge.Hoskins, A. (2014): The Mediatization of Memory. In Lundby, K. (Ed). Handbook of communication science vol. 29: Mediatization of Communication. P661-p679Thacker, D. C. & Webb, J. (2002). Introducing Children’s Literature: from romanticism to postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge. （楊雅捷、林盈蕙[譯] （2005）。《兒童文學導論：從浪漫主義到後現代主義》。台北：天衛文化。）Tomaz, T. (2018). Algorithms and Digital Media: Measurement and Control in the Mathematical Projection of the Real. In Thimm, C., Anastasiadis, M., Einspänner-Pflock, J. (Eds.) Media Logic(s) Revisited. Modelling the Interplay between Media Institutions, Media Technology and Societal Change, pp 265-286Jansen, J. (2016). Husserl. In The Routledge handbook of philosophy of imagination (pp. 89-101). Routledge.Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 203-222.Kearney, R. (1998). Poetics of imagining: Modern to post-modern (No. 6). Fordham Univ Press.Keightley, E. (2012). Time, Media and Modernity. Palgrave Macmillan UKKlein, J., Walter, M. Schimank, U. (2018). Ch 15 Researching individual`s media repertoirs: Challenges of qualitative interviews on cross-media practices. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink, (Ed)., Communicative Figurations: Transforming communications in times of deep mediatization, The Palgrave Macmillan.Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of ‘mediatization’ as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication 2007, 3: 256-260Krotz, F., & Hepp, A. (2013). A concretization of mediatization: How mediatization works and why ‘mediatized worlds’ are a helpful concept for empirical mediatization research. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3(2), 119-134.Krotz, F. (2014). Mediatization as a mover in modernity: social and cultural change in the context of media change. In Lundby, K. (eds.), Handbook of communication science vol. 21: Mediatization of Communication. p131-p161Krotz, F. (2018). Media Logic and the Mediatization Approach: A Good Partnership, a Mesalliance, or a Misunderstanding? In Thimm, C., Anastasiadis, M., Einspänner-Pflock, J. (Eds.) Media Logic(s) Revisited. Modelling the Interplay between Media Institutions, Media Technology and Societal Change, pp 41-61Kuipers, G. (2018). Communicative Figurations: Towards a New Paradigm for the Media Age? In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink, (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming communications in times of deep mediatization, pp. 425-436. The Palgrave Macmillan.Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Larsen, L. J. (2019). Play and Gameful Movies: The Ludification of Modern Cinema. Games and Culture,14(5), 455–477.Livingstone, S. (2009). On the mediation of everything: ICA presidential address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59 (1). pp. 1-18.Livingstone, S. & Lunt, P. (2014). Mediatization: an emerging paradigm for media and communication studies. In Lundby, K. eds. Handbook of communication science vol. 21: Mediatization of Communication. P703-p724Lohmeier, C., & Böhling, R. (2018). Researching communicative figurations: Necessities and challenges for empirical research. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink, (Ed)., Communicative Figurations (pp. 343-362). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.Lohmeier, C., Kaun, A., & Pentzold, C. (2020). Making time in digital societies: Considering the interplay of media, data, and temporalities—An introduction to the special issue. New Media & Society, 22(9), 1521-1527.Lunt, P. & Livingstone, S. (2016). Is ‘mediatization’ the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 462-470.Mäyrä, F. (2017). Pokémon GO: Entering the Ludic Society. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916678270Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York, London, New Delhi and Sydney: Bloomsbury.Matherne, S. (2016). Kant`s theory of the imagination. In The Routledge handbook of philosophy of imagination (pp. 55-68). Routledge.Nim, E. G. (2021). Deep Mediatization: Rethinking a Figurational Approach. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 26(4), 664-671.Pentzold (2018). Between moments and millennia: temporalising mediatization. Media, Culture & Society. 40(6), 927-937Pfaller, R. (2014). On the pleasure principle in culture: Illusions without owners. Verso Books.Rheingold, H,(1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. MA: Addison‐Wesley.[Online]. Available(retrieved on 2022/12/26): http://www.well.com/user/hlr/vcbook/index.htmlRosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.Schütz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world, 2 volumes. Evanston: Northwestern UPStein, A. (2013/09/17). The Uncomfortable Politics of the “Ludic Century”. Available on (Retrieved: 2019/10/22): https://killscreen.com/articles/uncomfortable-politics-ludic-century/van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & society, 12(2), 197-208.Wang, G. (2018). Media Communication Research in the Digital Era: Moving Beyond Ontological Dualism. Communication Theory, 28(3): 235–253.Walther, B. K. (2013). Playing and gaming. Game Studies, 3(1), 1-20.Walz, S. P., Deterding, S. (2015), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Zimmerman, E. (2015). Manifesto for a ludic century. In Walz, S. P., Deterding, S. (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 19–22). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Originally posted on KOTAKU. Available on: https://kotaku.com/manifesto-the-21st-century-will-be-defined-by-games-1275355204)Zimmerman, E. (2013/09/12). What’s wrong with the Ludic Century? Available on (Retrieved: 2019/10/22): https://ericzimmerman.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/whats-wrong-with-the-ludic-century/ zh_TW
