學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 企業規模控管及其對研發進展之衝擊──來自中國製造業的證據
On the Control of Firm Size and Its Impacts on the Advancement of Research and Development: Evidence from the Chinese Manufacturing Industry作者 趙毅
Yi, Chao貢獻者 李文傑
Lee, Wen-Chieh
趙毅
Yi, Chao關鍵詞 研發借貸限制
廠商動態模型
資源錯置
R&D borrowing constraints
Firm dynamics
Resource misallocation日期 2023 上傳時間 2-Aug-2023 13:43:21 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究探討中國近年的產業結構革新對科技發展與現存廠商規模的影響。科技是否蓬勃發展則與社會制度保障研發成果有關，而科技發展被視為推動產業技術走向低汙染的推手。中國採用自由經濟制度的同時卻保持獨裁的政治制度，並於近期扶持私有小企業發展，以及給予私人大企業較多限制。研究採用廠商動態模型描繪異質生產力廠商在規模不大時會有更快的發展速度以及借貸補貼，但擴大規模時面對更大的固定成本以及借貸限制。由於每期的利潤限制及未來利潤變動量不同，使不同生產力區段的廠商擁有不同投資決策，進而產生不同的廠商規模大小。程式模擬發現增加廠商借貸扭曲時，選擇退出市場的廠商明顯增多，且不會有廠商選擇擴大規模，使經濟體整體經濟福利下降。而降低廠商借貸扭曲時則會增加擴大廠商的門檻，但會因為研發資源分配使整體經濟福利上升，而兩者皆不會對平均生產力有太明顯的變動。
This research intends to gauge the effects of distorted borrowing constraints on the outcome of research and development (R&D). By focusing on the current two strong hands facts observed in mainland China that many larger businesses are constrained in the borrowing limit while the small sized business are promoted by the loosened borrowing constraint, the effects caused by the two strong hands are discussed in this research. The imposed distorted borrowing constraints would hinder the business to grow further once approaching the size limit to trigger the disadvantageous borrowing conditions. Besides, firms would exit the market with higher chances as more distorted borrowing constraints are imposed. We concluded that the imposed borrowing distortions would result in the loss of welfare due to the staggered firm size and distorted firms` entry and exit events.參考文獻 吳明澤（2018）。近期中國大陸「國進民退」之觀察』。大陸與兩岸情勢簡報107年11月。中華民國大陸委員會。Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Alp, H., Bloom, N., & Kerr, W. (2018). Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth. The American Economic Review, 108(11), 3450–3491.https://www.jstor.org/stable/26528333Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S.（2023）. Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity. PublicAffairs.Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Crown Publishers.Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351.https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R. & Howitt, P.（2005）. Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701-728. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.2.701Alviarez, V., Javier, C., & Natalia, R.（2020）. Firm-Embedded Productivity and Cross-Country Income Differences. NBER Working Paper, No. w27915. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27915Chu, A. C., & Cozzi, G. (2014). R&D and Economic Growth in a Cash-in-advance Economy. International Economic Review, 55(2), 507–524.http://www.jstor.org/stable/24517054Cooley, T.F. and Prescott, E.C.（1995）. Economic Growth and Business Cycles. Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, 1.Hsieh, C.T., & Klenow, P.J.（2009）. Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1403-1448.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40506263Hsieh, C.T.（2022）. Two Strong Hands. The Wire China. https://www.thewirechina.com/2022/05/22/two-strong-hands/Melitz, M.J.（2003）. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1555536Metcalf, G.E., & Stock, J.H. （2020）. The Macroeconomic Impact of Europe`s Carbon Taxes. NBER Working Paper, No. w27488. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3644097Restuccia, D. & Rogerson, R.（2017）. The Causes and Costs of Misallocation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 151-74. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.31.3.151Romer, P.M.（1990）. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
110258037資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110258037 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 李文傑 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Lee, Wen-Chieh en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 趙毅 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yi, Chao en_US dc.creator (作者) 趙毅 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Yi, Chao en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Aug-2023 13:43:21 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Aug-2023 13:43:21 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Aug-2023 13:43:21 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0110258037 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146480 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 經濟學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 110258037 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究探討中國近年的產業結構革新對科技發展與現存廠商規模的影響。科技是否蓬勃發展則與社會制度保障研發成果有關，而科技發展被視為推動產業技術走向低汙染的推手。中國採用自由經濟制度的同時卻保持獨裁的政治制度，並於近期扶持私有小企業發展，以及給予私人大企業較多限制。研究採用廠商動態模型描繪異質生產力廠商在規模不大時會有更快的發展速度以及借貸補貼，但擴大規模時面對更大的固定成本以及借貸限制。由於每期的利潤限制及未來利潤變動量不同，使不同生產力區段的廠商擁有不同投資決策，進而產生不同的廠商規模大小。程式模擬發現增加廠商借貸扭曲時，選擇退出市場的廠商明顯增多，且不會有廠商選擇擴大規模，使經濟體整體經濟福利下降。而降低廠商借貸扭曲時則會增加擴大廠商的門檻，但會因為研發資源分配使整體經濟福利上升，而兩者皆不會對平均生產力有太明顯的變動。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This research intends to gauge the effects of distorted borrowing constraints on the outcome of research and development (R&D). By focusing on the current two strong hands facts observed in mainland China that many larger businesses are constrained in the borrowing limit while the small sized business are promoted by the loosened borrowing constraint, the effects caused by the two strong hands are discussed in this research. The imposed distorted borrowing constraints would hinder the business to grow further once approaching the size limit to trigger the disadvantageous borrowing conditions. Besides, firms would exit the market with higher chances as more distorted borrowing constraints are imposed. We concluded that the imposed borrowing distortions would result in the loss of welfare due to the staggered firm size and distorted firms` entry and exit events. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 表次 5圖次 6第一章 緒論 7第一節 科技發展與環保問題 7第二節 面對污染的公部門舉措 8第三節 產業結構革新與政治分權 9第二章 文獻回顧 15第一節 創新技術的分類 15第二節 廠商創新及創新之重要性 15第三節 研發外部性、制度及研發政策 16第四節 中國產業結構革新所引發之阻礙創新 18第五節 廠商決策模型 20第三章 理論模型 22第一節 理論模型假設 22第二節 小規模廠商之穩定狀態 24第三節 大規模廠商均衡成長路徑 26第四章 模型模擬設定與結果 29第一節 數值模擬參數設定 29第二節 模擬方法 30第三節 數值模擬結果 31第五章 結論與建議 37第一節 研究統整及結論 37第二節 研究限制及建議 37參考文獻 39附錄 42 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2010989 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110258037 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研發借貸限制 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廠商動態模型 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資源錯置 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) R&D borrowing constraints en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Firm dynamics en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resource misallocation en_US dc.title (題名) 企業規模控管及其對研發進展之衝擊──來自中國製造業的證據 zh_TW dc.title (題名) On the Control of Firm Size and Its Impacts on the Advancement of Research and Development: Evidence from the Chinese Manufacturing Industry en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳明澤（2018）。近期中國大陸「國進民退」之觀察』。大陸與兩岸情勢簡報107年11月。中華民國大陸委員會。Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Alp, H., Bloom, N., & Kerr, W. (2018). Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth. The American Economic Review, 108(11), 3450–3491.https://www.jstor.org/stable/26528333Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S.（2023）. Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity. PublicAffairs.Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Crown Publishers.Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351.https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R. & Howitt, P.（2005）. Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701-728. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.2.701Alviarez, V., Javier, C., & Natalia, R.（2020）. Firm-Embedded Productivity and Cross-Country Income Differences. NBER Working Paper, No. w27915. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27915Chu, A. C., & Cozzi, G. (2014). R&D and Economic Growth in a Cash-in-advance Economy. International Economic Review, 55(2), 507–524.http://www.jstor.org/stable/24517054Cooley, T.F. and Prescott, E.C.（1995）. Economic Growth and Business Cycles. Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, 1.Hsieh, C.T., & Klenow, P.J.（2009）. Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1403-1448.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40506263Hsieh, C.T.（2022）. Two Strong Hands. The Wire China. https://www.thewirechina.com/2022/05/22/two-strong-hands/Melitz, M.J.（2003）. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1555536Metcalf, G.E., & Stock, J.H. （2020）. The Macroeconomic Impact of Europe`s Carbon Taxes. NBER Working Paper, No. w27488. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3644097Restuccia, D. & Rogerson, R.（2017）. The Causes and Costs of Misallocation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 151-74. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.31.3.151Romer, P.M.（1990）. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632 zh_TW
