1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 新北市國民小學校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能關係之研究
A study on the relationship among principals’ positive instructional supervision, teachers’ psychological capital and teachers’ teaching effectiveness in New Taipei City
作者 陳耶如
Chen, Yeh-Ju
貢獻者 郭昭佑
陳耶如
Chen, Yeh-Ju
關鍵詞 教學視導
校長正向教學視導
教師心理資本
教師教學效能
Instructional supervision
Principals’ positive instructional supervision
Teachers` psychological capital
Teachers` teaching effectiveness
日期 2023
上傳時間 2-Aug-2023 14:26:48 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以新北市國民小學教師為研究對象，瞭解校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能關係之研究。採問卷調查法，共抽樣50所學校，共753位教師。本研究之問卷資料採用描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、使用process檢測中介效果進行統計分析。
研究結論如下：
一、國民小學教師知覺校長正向教學視導為中高程度，「建立正向關係」得分最高；「提升自我價值」得分最低。
二、國民小學教師知覺教師心理資本為中高程度，「希望」得分最高；「自我效能」得分最低。
三、國民小學教師知覺教師教學效能為中高程度，「良好學習氣氛」得分最高；「多元學習策略」得分最低。
四、國民小學教師就其「服務年資」與「學校規模」的不同，在知覺「校長正向教學視導」上有顯著之差異。
五、國民小學教師就其「性別」、「服務年資」、「最高學歷」、「擔任職務」與「學校規模」的不同，在知覺「教師心理資本」上有顯著之差異。
六、國民小學教師就其「服務年資」的不同，在知覺「教師教學效能」上有顯著之差異。
七、國民小學之教師知覺校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能各構面及整體間呈現顯著正相關。
八、教師心理資本在校長正向教學視導與教師教學效能具有部分中介效果。
根據統計結果提出建議，以利後續教育相關團體之研究參考。
In This study, New Taipei City elementary school teachers as the research object, to find the relationship between the principals’ positive instructional supervision, teachers’ psychological capital and teachers’ teaching effectiveness. The study will be approached by the survey method, the samples which include 50 schools and 730 questionnaires, All data were analyzed by the methods of descriptive statistics independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, using Haye`s Conditional Process Models (2013).
The findings of this study are as follows:
1.Elementary school teachers` perception of principals’ positive instructional supervision is above average, " establishing a positive relationship " is the highest, and " improving self-worth" is the lowest.
2.Elementary school teachers` perception of teachers’ psychological capital is above average, " hope " is the highest, and " self-efficacy" is the lowest.
3.Elementary school teachers` perception of teachers’ teaching effectiveness is above average, " quality learning atmosphere " is the highest, and " multiple learning strategies " is the lowest.
4.Elementary school teachers have significant differences in their perception of " principals’ positive instructional supervision " by "service years" and "school size".
5.Elementary school teachers have significant differences in their perception of " teachers’ psychological capital " by "genders", "service years", "highest education level", "positions" and "school size".
6.Elementary school teachers have significant differences in their perception of "teachers’ teaching effectiveness" by "service years".
7.There is a significant positive correlation among teachers` perception of the principals’ positive instructional supervision, teachers` psychological capital and teachers` teaching effectiveness.
8.The Teachers` psychological capital has a partial intermediary effect between the principals’ positive instructional supervision and teachers` teaching effectiveness.
Finally, this study hopes to provide specific suggestions to educational administration agencies, Elementary schools, and other future researches.
參考文獻 一、中文部分
丁一顧、莊念青與李亦欣（2019）。正向教學視導的理論基礎與實施程序之探究。課程與教學，22（1），121-140。
丁一顧、王淑麗與江姮姬（2019）。國小校長共創式領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究：以教師信任為中介變項。教育科學研究期刊，64（3），237-264。
丁一顧、謝汝鳳與陳佳琳（2020）。教學輔導教師正向教學視導與夥伴教師教學效能關係之研究」。課程與教學，23（2），171-194。
王令宜（2017）。中小學教師專業發展評鑑指標之研究。國家教育研究院整合研究計畫案成果報告（NAER-105-09-C-1-03-04-1-17）。新北市：國家教育研究院。
王淑玲（2017）。南投縣小型國民小學教師教學效能相關問題與因應策略之研究。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
李珀（1999）。利用教學視導系統提昇教師之教學品質。課程與教學，2（2），49-70。
李新民（2009）。幼兒教師的心理資本及其與工作表現的潛在關聯。幼兒保育學刊，7，1-23。
李新民（2010）。國小教師的心理資本測量及其與組織承諾、教學效能、組織公民行為的潛在關聯初探。國民教育學報，6，29–61。
李新民（2015）。正向領導與幼兒園教師心理資本相關之初探研究。樹德科技大學學報，17（1）。173-202。
李勁霆、林和春（2021）。國民小學校長正向領導與教師心理資本關係之研究：以學校組織變革為中介變項。學校行政，135。95-116。
沈碩彬（2014）。高中職教師心理資本、工作價值觀、情緒勞務與學校生活適應之徑路模式探析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
吳培源（2005）。教學視導：觀念、之能與實務。台北市：心理。
吳彥彣、楊慶麟（2016）。國民中學組織創新氣氛對教師創新教學之研究-以心理資本為中介。學校行政，106，52-82。
吳政達（2019）。國中校長真誠領、教師心理資本與工作投入關係之研究：信任的中介效果分析。臺東大學教育學報，30（1），1-31。
余民寧、陳柏霖、湯雅芬（2012）。大學生心理資本量表編製及其相關因素之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，8（4），19-52。
邱憲義、蕭佳純（2019）。高中教師教學風格與教學效能之相關研究─以教師專業發展為中介變項、學校組織文化為調節變項。當代教育研究季刊，27（1）， 39-78。
周竹一（2022）。新北市國民小學校長正向領導與教師教學效能關係之研究。學校行政，137，92-114。
林進材（2002）。教學效能的研究發展及其在教學與研究上的意義。教育研究月刊，104，32-43。
林新發。(2012)。心理資本與正向組織行為。國民教育月刊，52（4）。1-7。
林和春（2013）。國小校長教學視導之研究：角色踐行與能力發展為焦點。中等教育，64（4），33-35。
林志鈞、莊坤財（2018）。國小教師心理資本對團體凝聚力的影響－情緒勞務、休閒調適之中介效果。慈惠學報，14。72-100。
林志鈞、許佳芊與李沛晴（2022）。偏鄉教師的正向心理資本、休閒因應、職涯滿意與教學效能關係之研究。康大學報，12，27-48。
周淑卿（2003）。教師敘事與當代教師專業的開展。教育資料集刊，28，407-420。
侯靜怡（2020）。桃園市國小校長正向教學視導、教師工作投入與教學自我效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班，臺北市。
姚玉萍（2015）。臺中市公立國民小學教師心理資本與教師專業成長之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。中臺科技大學，臺中市。
翁暄睿、陳慧綺（2020）。國民小學教師專業學習社群對教師教學創新影響之研究：以正向心理資本為中介變項。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，13（3），113-138。
徐奕婕（2021）。新竹縣公立國民小學教師心理資本與教師情緒勞務之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士班，新北市。
秦夢群、吳勁甫（2011）。國中校長教學領導、學校知識管理與教師教學效能之多層次分析。教育與心理研究，34（2），1-31。
教育部（2015）。數位學習服務平台。擷取自http://ups.moe.edu.tw/index.php
孫志麟（2003）。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報，34（2），139-156。
莊念清、王淑麗與丁一顧（2022）。國小校長正向教學視導對教師教學效能影響之研究。教育政策論壇，25（2），77-110。
許籐繼（2020）。教師文化對教學效能影響之探究。課程與教學，23（1），35-60。
郭昭佑、鄭芳蘋（2017）。教學視導的新趨勢：正向視導概念的發展。教育研究月刊，278，110-119。
陳奎憙（2001）。教育社會學導論。臺北市：師大書苑。
陳奎憙（2007）。教育社會學。臺北市：三民。
陳木金（1997）。國民小學教師教學效能評鑑量表編製之研究。藝術學報，61，221-251。
陳木金（1997）。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
陳木金、邱馨儀（2012）。校長的教學視導的能力指標之建構。國立台北教育大學舉辦「2012年兩岸三地校長學學術研討會」論文集，1-15。
陳繁興、蔡吉郎與翁福元（2017）。技術型高中校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與教學效能關係之研究。教育政策論壇，20（4），63-106。
陳柏霖、沈妙珊、許雅涵（2021）。以心理資本為中介角色：讀經志工教師教學信念與班級經營效能之關係。教育科學研究期刊，66（2）。207-239。
張德銳（2012）。區別化教師評鑑制度的規劃與實施策略。臺北市立教育大學學報，43（1），121-144。
張德銳、李俊達、王淑珍（2014）。認知教練對中小學教師教學省思及教學效能
影響之研究：以參與教師專業發展評鑑方案之教師為例。臺北市立大學學
報，45（1），61-80。
張怡諄（2014）。桃竹苗地區國民小學教師對國民教育輔導團的教學領導知覺與教師教學效能之研究。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
張芳全（2015）。統計就是要這樣跑（第三版）。臺北市：心理出版。
黃麗鴻、黃芳銘（2012）。國小教師心理資本、工作滿意度與組織公民行為關係之研究。αβγ量化研究學刊，4（1），29‒53。
黃永和（2015）。國小教師社會互動學習能力的教學效能感研究。教師專業研究期刊，9，1-29。
湯誌龍、楊麗香（2005）。高職餐飲管理科教師工作壓力、因應策略與教學效能之研究。弘光人文社會學報，3，250-280。
葉琛、朱思穎（2017）。臺北市學前教育教師對身心障礙幼兒教學效能感看法之研究。臺北市立大學學報，48（1），49-72。
葉子明、周君芳（2020）。資訊素養、資訊科技融入教學對國小教師專業成長及教學效能影響之研究。全球科技管理與教育期刊， 9（1），20-41。
鄭芳蘋（2018）。正向教學視導量表之編製（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所，臺北市。
羅霞、陳維政（2009）。組織管理研究的新領域-積極組織管理。經濟管理，31（10），174-178。
謝文全（1999）。教學視導的意義與原則-並以英國教學視導制度為例。課程與教學，2（2），1-14。
謝傳崇、李俊璋（2015)。校長肯定式探詢對教師心理資本影響之研究。學校行政，100，1-23。
謝傳崇、李孟雪（2017）。國民小學校長翻轉領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學創新關係之研究。教育政策論壇，2（2），151-184。
謝傳崇、柳喬馨與李勁霆（2021）。幼兒園教學領導的實踐：教師社群與教學效能的交互影響。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，14（2），91-118。
謝惠如（2018）。澳門私立中學教師知覺校長教學領導與創新教學關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
二、英文部分
Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teacher’s sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Ongman.
Avolio, B. J. & Luthans, F. (2005). The high impact leader: Moments matter for accelerating authentic leadership development, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall: Englewood cliffs.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ.
Bannink, F. (2014). Handbook of positive supervision: For supervisors, facilitators, and peer groups. Hogrefe Publishing.
Borich, G. D. (2016). Observation skills for effective teaching. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Burhanuddin, N. A. N., Ahmad, N. A., Said, R. R., & Asimiran, S. (2019). A systematic review of the psychological capital (PsyCap) research development: Implementation and gaps. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(3), 133-150.
Buskist, W. (2002). Effective teaching: Perspectives and insights from division Two`s 2-and 4-year awardees. Teaching of Psychology, 29(3), 188-193.
Carifio, M. S., & Hess, A. K. (1987). Who is the ideal supervisor? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 244–250.
Caza, A., Bagozzi, R. P., Woolley, L., Levy, L., & Caza, B. (2010). Psychological capital and authentic leadership: Measurement, gender, and cultural extension. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2(1), 53-70.
Casad, S. S. (2015). Effect of psychological capital on elementary teacher stress and workplace affect. Old Dominion University.
Cogan, M. L. (1973). Clinical supervision. Bosten：Houghton Mifflin.
Coutu, D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard business review, 80(5), 46-56.
DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2008). Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development. Boston: Pearson.
DiPaola , M. F. , & Hoy , W. K. ( 2014 ) . Improving instruction through supervision , eval uation , and professional development . Charlotte , NC : Information Age Publish ing .
Eacute, J., & Esteve, M. (2000). The transformation of the teachers` role at the end of the twentieth century: New challenges for the future. Educational review, 52(2), 197-207.
Eradio, M. R. (2003). Tips to improve teaching effectiveness. Retrieved from http://hyper. vcsun.org/Hyper News/djordan/get/itaeffective.html
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2, 300–319.
Glanz, J., & Behar-Hornstein, L. S. (Eds.). (2000). Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
Glickman , C. D .. Gordon , S. P .. & Ross - Gordon , J. M. (2014) . Super Vision and in structional leadership A developmental approach ( 9th ed .) . New York , NY : Pearson.
Goldsmith, A. H., Veum, J. R., & Darity, W. (1997). The impact of psychological and human capital on wages. Economic Inquiry, 35, 15−829.
Grifith,M., & Grifith,I. (2002). Law of purchasing and supply (3rd ed.). Edinburg: Prrntice Hall.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct
dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.
Harris, B. M. (1976). Supervisor Competence and Strategies for Improving Instruction. Educational Leadership, 33(5), 332-5.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hayward, P. A. (2001). Students’ initial impressions of teaching effectiveness: Analysis of structured response items. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
Hosen, R., Solovey-Hosen, D., & Stern, L. (2003). Education and capital development: Capital as durable personal, social, economic and political influences on the happiness of individuals. Education, 123(3), 496-514.
Howard, F. (2008). Managing stress or enhancing well-being? Positive psychology’s contributions to clinical supervision. Australian Psychologist, 43, 105–113.
Hribar, D. C. (2016). Instructional effectiveness through assessment of student performance. Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1018&context=bollinger-rosado
Hung, C. L., & Li, F. C. (2017). Teacher perceptions of professional role and innovative teaching at elementary schools in Taiwan. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(21), 1036-1045.
Hutt, C. H., Scott, J., & King, M. (1983). A phenomenological study of supervisees` positive and negative experiences in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 20(1), 118.
Jackson, S. R., & Richard, M. M. (2007). Teacher’s Myers-Briggs personality profiles: Identifying effective teacher personality traits. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 432-441.
Jones, J. E., & Wade, J. C. (2015). Positive supervision and training. In J. C. Wade, L. I. Marks, & R. D. Hetzel (Eds.), Positive psychology on the college campus (pp. 191-217). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 86(1), 80.
Kalule, L., & Bouchamma, Y. (2013). Supervisors’ perception of instructional supervision. International studies in educational administration, 41(1), 89-104.
Karakus, M., & Demir, S. (2015). Psikolojik sermaye ile stress, tükenmişlik, kaygı, iş doyumu ve ise sargınlık arasındaki ilişki [The Relationship between Psychological Capital and Stress, Anxiety, Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Job Involvement]. Presented at II. International Eurasian Educational Research Congress, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TR.
Kristjánsson, K. (2012). Positive psychology and positive education: Old wine in new bottles?. Educational psychologist, 47(2), 86-105.
Larson, M. D., & Luthans, F ( 2006 ). Potential added value of psychological capital in predicting work attitude. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13 (2). 75-92.
Lowyck, J. (1994). Teaching effectiveness: An overview of studies. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 19(1), 17-25.
Luthans, F. (2002) Positivebrganizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 57-72.
Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: Beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 41(1), 45-50.
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social and now positive psychological capitalmanagement: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143‒160.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Li, W. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance. Management and Organization Review, 1, 247-269.
Luthans, F. (2005). Organizational behavior, 10th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Luthans, F.,Avey, J.B., and Avolio,B. J. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of organizational Behavior, 27,387−393.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541−572.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Malikow, M. (2006). Effective teacher study. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 16(3), 1-9.
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American psychologist, 56(3), 227-239.
Medley, D. M. (1982). Teacher effectiveness. In H. E. Mitzel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (5th ed.) (pp. 1841-1851). New York, NY: The Free.
Money, S. M. (1992). What Is Teaching Effectiveness? A Survey of Student and Teacher Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness. Retrieved from ERIC Database. (ED351056)
Mulkeen, A., Chapman, D.W., Dejaeghere, J. & Leu, E. (2007), Recruiting, Retraining and Retaining Secondary School Teachers and Head Teachers in Sub-Saharan Africa World Bank Working Paper 99 (Washington, DC: World Bank).
Mulyasa. (2009). Kompetensi dan Profesi Guru. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Nolan, J. F., & Hoover, L. A. (2004). Teacher supervision and evaluation.
Ornstein, A. C. & Lasley II, T. J. (2000). Strategiesfor effective teaching (3r ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Owens, R. G. (2004). Organizational behavior in education (8th ed). NJ: Prentice Hell.
Pascarelli, J. T., & Ponticell, J. A. (1994). Trust-blocking responses: Training materials developed for co-teaching.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate behavioral research, 42(1), 185-227.
Range, B., Duncan, H., & Hvidston, D. (2013). How faculty supervise and mentor pre-service teachers: Implications for principal supervision of novice teachers. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(2), 43-58.
Scheier. M. F. & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism. coping. and health: Assessment andimplications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology. 4(3) 219-247.
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454-499.
Seligman, M. (1998). Positive social science. APA Monitor, 29(2), 5.
Seligman, M.E.P. (2002) Authentic happiness: using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment (New York, Free Press)
Sergiovanni, T. & Starratt, R. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition. (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hil.
Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. (2001). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56(3), 216-217.
Staw, B. M., Sutton, R. I., and Pellod, L. H. (1994). Employee positive emotion and favorable outcomes at the workplace. Organizational Science, 5, 51–71.
Stronge, J., & Hindman, J. (2003). Hiring the best teachers. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 48-52.
Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2000). Supervision that improves teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2013). Supervision that improves teaching and learning: Strategies and techniques. Corwin Press.
Tettegah, S. (2002). Teachers, identity, psychological capital and electronically mediated representations of cultural consciousness. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1946-1947). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Tiger, L. (1979). Optimism: The biology of hope (p. 84).
Travers, C. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1994). Psychophysiological responses to teach stress: A move toward more objective methodologies. European Review o f Applied Psychology, 44(2), 137-146.
Tsai, M. H., Chang, S. H., Hsieh, M.C. (2016). The impact of Taiwan elementary principal’s distributed leadership and teacher’s emotional labor on teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics, 9(1), 67-88.
Tucker, P.D. & Pounder, D.G. (2010), Supervision and Personnel Administration, in E.L. Baker, B. McGraw & P.L. Peterson (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Education. 3rd edn (Oxford: Elsevier): 839–845.
Wade, J. C., & Jones, J. E. (2014). Strength-based clinical supervision: A positive psychology approach to clinical training. Springer Publishing Company.
Wiles, K., & Lovell, J. T. (1975). Supervision for better schools.
Woolfolk, H. A. (2004). Self-efficacy in college teaching. Retrieved from
http://www.asa.mnscu.edu/facultydevelopment/resources/pod/Packet4/selfeffic
acyincollegeteaching.htm
Wray, D., Medwell, J., Fox, R., & Poulson, L. (2000). The teaching practices of effective teachers of literacy. Educational Review, 52(1), 75-84.
Wu, R. T. (2005). Relationship between Teachers` Teaching Effectiveness and School Effectiveness in Comprehensive High Schools in Taiwan, Republic of China. Online Submission.
Xue, Z. (2014). Dilemma of Teachers’ Professional Development and Protective Countermeasures. In 3rd International Conference on Science and Social Research (ICSSR 2014). Atlantis Press.
Zepeda, S. (2017). Instructional supervision : applying tools and concepts / Sally J. Zepeda. (Fourth edition.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育行政與政策研究所
106171014
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106171014
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 郭昭佑zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳耶如zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Yeh-Juen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳耶如zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Yeh-Juen_US
dc.date (日期) 2023en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-Aug-2023 14:26:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Aug-2023 14:26:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Aug-2023 14:26:48 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0106171014en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146669-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育行政與政策研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 106171014zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以新北市國民小學教師為研究對象，瞭解校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能關係之研究。採問卷調查法，共抽樣50所學校，共753位教師。本研究之問卷資料採用描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、使用process檢測中介效果進行統計分析。
研究結論如下：
一、國民小學教師知覺校長正向教學視導為中高程度，「建立正向關係」得分最高；「提升自我價值」得分最低。
二、國民小學教師知覺教師心理資本為中高程度，「希望」得分最高；「自我效能」得分最低。
三、國民小學教師知覺教師教學效能為中高程度，「良好學習氣氛」得分最高；「多元學習策略」得分最低。
四、國民小學教師就其「服務年資」與「學校規模」的不同，在知覺「校長正向教學視導」上有顯著之差異。
五、國民小學教師就其「性別」、「服務年資」、「最高學歷」、「擔任職務」與「學校規模」的不同，在知覺「教師心理資本」上有顯著之差異。
六、國民小學教師就其「服務年資」的不同，在知覺「教師教學效能」上有顯著之差異。
七、國民小學之教師知覺校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能各構面及整體間呈現顯著正相關。
八、教師心理資本在校長正向教學視導與教師教學效能具有部分中介效果。
根據統計結果提出建議，以利後續教育相關團體之研究參考。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In This study, New Taipei City elementary school teachers as the research object, to find the relationship between the principals’ positive instructional supervision, teachers’ psychological capital and teachers’ teaching effectiveness. The study will be approached by the survey method, the samples which include 50 schools and 730 questionnaires, All data were analyzed by the methods of descriptive statistics independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, using Haye`s Conditional Process Models (2013).
The findings of this study are as follows:
1.Elementary school teachers` perception of principals’ positive instructional supervision is above average, " establishing a positive relationship " is the highest, and " improving self-worth" is the lowest.
2.Elementary school teachers` perception of teachers’ psychological capital is above average, " hope " is the highest, and " self-efficacy" is the lowest.
3.Elementary school teachers` perception of teachers’ teaching effectiveness is above average, " quality learning atmosphere " is the highest, and " multiple learning strategies " is the lowest.
4.Elementary school teachers have significant differences in their perception of " principals’ positive instructional supervision " by "service years" and "school size".
5.Elementary school teachers have significant differences in their perception of " teachers’ psychological capital " by "genders", "service years", "highest education level", "positions" and "school size".
6.Elementary school teachers have significant differences in their perception of "teachers’ teaching effectiveness" by "service years".
7.There is a significant positive correlation among teachers` perception of the principals’ positive instructional supervision, teachers` psychological capital and teachers` teaching effectiveness.
8.The Teachers` psychological capital has a partial intermediary effect between the principals’ positive instructional supervision and teachers` teaching effectiveness.
Finally, this study hopes to provide specific suggestions to educational administration agencies, Elementary schools, and other future researches.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖次 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 待答問題 5
第四節 名詞釋義 5
第五節 研究範圍與限制 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 校長正向教學視導之理論研究 9
第二節 教師心理資本之理論研究 22
第三節教師教學效能之理論研究 34
第四節 校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能之相關研究 46
第三章 研究設計與實施 51
第一節 研究架構與變項 51
第二節 研究對象 57
第三節 研究工具 60
第四節 實施程序 62
第五節 資料處理 63
第四章 研究結果分析與討論 65
第一節 國民小學校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能之現況分析 65
第二節 不同背景變項教師知覺國民小學校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能現況之差異分析 70
第三節 新北市國民小學校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能之相關分析 96
第四節 國民小學校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能之中介效果 100
第五章 結論與建議 103
第一節 結論 103
第二節 建議 108
參考文獻 113
中文部分 113
英文部分 119
附錄 127
附錄一 量表使用同意授權書 127
附錄二 正式問卷 131		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 5597436 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106171014en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教學視導zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 校長正向教學視導zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教師心理資本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教師教學效能zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Instructional supervisionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Principals’ positive instructional supervisionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Teachers` psychological capitalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Teachers` teaching effectivenessen_US
dc.title (題名) 新北市國民小學校長正向教學視導、教師心理資本與教師教學效能關係之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A study on the relationship among principals’ positive instructional supervision, teachers’ psychological capital and teachers’ teaching effectiveness in New Taipei Cityen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分
丁一顧、莊念青與李亦欣（2019）。正向教學視導的理論基礎與實施程序之探究。課程與教學，22（1），121-140。
丁一顧、王淑麗與江姮姬（2019）。國小校長共創式領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究：以教師信任為中介變項。教育科學研究期刊，64（3），237-264。
丁一顧、謝汝鳳與陳佳琳（2020）。教學輔導教師正向教學視導與夥伴教師教學效能關係之研究」。課程與教學，23（2），171-194。
王令宜（2017）。中小學教師專業發展評鑑指標之研究。國家教育研究院整合研究計畫案成果報告（NAER-105-09-C-1-03-04-1-17）。新北市：國家教育研究院。
王淑玲（2017）。南投縣小型國民小學教師教學效能相關問題與因應策略之研究。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
李珀（1999）。利用教學視導系統提昇教師之教學品質。課程與教學，2（2），49-70。
李新民（2009）。幼兒教師的心理資本及其與工作表現的潛在關聯。幼兒保育學刊，7，1-23。
李新民（2010）。國小教師的心理資本測量及其與組織承諾、教學效能、組織公民行為的潛在關聯初探。國民教育學報，6，29–61。
李新民（2015）。正向領導與幼兒園教師心理資本相關之初探研究。樹德科技大學學報，17（1）。173-202。
李勁霆、林和春（2021）。國民小學校長正向領導與教師心理資本關係之研究：以學校組織變革為中介變項。學校行政，135。95-116。
沈碩彬（2014）。高中職教師心理資本、工作價值觀、情緒勞務與學校生活適應之徑路模式探析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
吳培源（2005）。教學視導：觀念、之能與實務。台北市：心理。
吳彥彣、楊慶麟（2016）。國民中學組織創新氣氛對教師創新教學之研究-以心理資本為中介。學校行政，106，52-82。
吳政達（2019）。國中校長真誠領、教師心理資本與工作投入關係之研究：信任的中介效果分析。臺東大學教育學報，30（1），1-31。
余民寧、陳柏霖、湯雅芬（2012）。大學生心理資本量表編製及其相關因素之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，8（4），19-52。
邱憲義、蕭佳純（2019）。高中教師教學風格與教學效能之相關研究─以教師專業發展為中介變項、學校組織文化為調節變項。當代教育研究季刊，27（1）， 39-78。
周竹一（2022）。新北市國民小學校長正向領導與教師教學效能關係之研究。學校行政，137，92-114。
林進材（2002）。教學效能的研究發展及其在教學與研究上的意義。教育研究月刊，104，32-43。
林新發。(2012)。心理資本與正向組織行為。國民教育月刊，52（4）。1-7。
林和春（2013）。國小校長教學視導之研究：角色踐行與能力發展為焦點。中等教育，64（4），33-35。
林志鈞、莊坤財（2018）。國小教師心理資本對團體凝聚力的影響－情緒勞務、休閒調適之中介效果。慈惠學報，14。72-100。
林志鈞、許佳芊與李沛晴（2022）。偏鄉教師的正向心理資本、休閒因應、職涯滿意與教學效能關係之研究。康大學報，12，27-48。
周淑卿（2003）。教師敘事與當代教師專業的開展。教育資料集刊，28，407-420。
侯靜怡（2020）。桃園市國小校長正向教學視導、教師工作投入與教學自我效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班，臺北市。
姚玉萍（2015）。臺中市公立國民小學教師心理資本與教師專業成長之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。中臺科技大學，臺中市。
翁暄睿、陳慧綺（2020）。國民小學教師專業學習社群對教師教學創新影響之研究：以正向心理資本為中介變項。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，13（3），113-138。
徐奕婕（2021）。新竹縣公立國民小學教師心理資本與教師情緒勞務之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士班，新北市。
秦夢群、吳勁甫（2011）。國中校長教學領導、學校知識管理與教師教學效能之多層次分析。教育與心理研究，34（2），1-31。
教育部（2015）。數位學習服務平台。擷取自http://ups.moe.edu.tw/index.php
孫志麟（2003）。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報，34（2），139-156。
莊念清、王淑麗與丁一顧（2022）。國小校長正向教學視導對教師教學效能影響之研究。教育政策論壇，25（2），77-110。
許籐繼（2020）。教師文化對教學效能影響之探究。課程與教學，23（1），35-60。
郭昭佑、鄭芳蘋（2017）。教學視導的新趨勢：正向視導概念的發展。教育研究月刊，278，110-119。
陳奎憙（2001）。教育社會學導論。臺北市：師大書苑。
陳奎憙（2007）。教育社會學。臺北市：三民。
陳木金（1997）。國民小學教師教學效能評鑑量表編製之研究。藝術學報，61，221-251。
陳木金（1997）。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
陳木金、邱馨儀（2012）。校長的教學視導的能力指標之建構。國立台北教育大學舉辦「2012年兩岸三地校長學學術研討會」論文集，1-15。
陳繁興、蔡吉郎與翁福元（2017）。技術型高中校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與教學效能關係之研究。教育政策論壇，20（4），63-106。
陳柏霖、沈妙珊、許雅涵（2021）。以心理資本為中介角色：讀經志工教師教學信念與班級經營效能之關係。教育科學研究期刊，66（2）。207-239。
張德銳（2012）。區別化教師評鑑制度的規劃與實施策略。臺北市立教育大學學報，43（1），121-144。
張德銳、李俊達、王淑珍（2014）。認知教練對中小學教師教學省思及教學效能
影響之研究：以參與教師專業發展評鑑方案之教師為例。臺北市立大學學
報，45（1），61-80。
張怡諄（2014）。桃竹苗地區國民小學教師對國民教育輔導團的教學領導知覺與教師教學效能之研究。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
張芳全（2015）。統計就是要這樣跑（第三版）。臺北市：心理出版。
黃麗鴻、黃芳銘（2012）。國小教師心理資本、工作滿意度與組織公民行為關係之研究。αβγ量化研究學刊，4（1），29‒53。
黃永和（2015）。國小教師社會互動學習能力的教學效能感研究。教師專業研究期刊，9，1-29。
湯誌龍、楊麗香（2005）。高職餐飲管理科教師工作壓力、因應策略與教學效能之研究。弘光人文社會學報，3，250-280。
葉琛、朱思穎（2017）。臺北市學前教育教師對身心障礙幼兒教學效能感看法之研究。臺北市立大學學報，48（1），49-72。
葉子明、周君芳（2020）。資訊素養、資訊科技融入教學對國小教師專業成長及教學效能影響之研究。全球科技管理與教育期刊， 9（1），20-41。
鄭芳蘋（2018）。正向教學視導量表之編製（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所，臺北市。
羅霞、陳維政（2009）。組織管理研究的新領域-積極組織管理。經濟管理，31（10），174-178。
謝文全（1999）。教學視導的意義與原則-並以英國教學視導制度為例。課程與教學，2（2），1-14。
謝傳崇、李俊璋（2015)。校長肯定式探詢對教師心理資本影響之研究。學校行政，100，1-23。
謝傳崇、李孟雪（2017）。國民小學校長翻轉領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學創新關係之研究。教育政策論壇，2（2），151-184。
謝傳崇、柳喬馨與李勁霆（2021）。幼兒園教學領導的實踐：教師社群與教學效能的交互影響。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，14（2），91-118。
謝惠如（2018）。澳門私立中學教師知覺校長教學領導與創新教學關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
二、英文部分
Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teacher’s sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Ongman.
Avolio, B. J. & Luthans, F. (2005). The high impact leader: Moments matter for accelerating authentic leadership development, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall: Englewood cliffs.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ.
Bannink, F. (2014). Handbook of positive supervision: For supervisors, facilitators, and peer groups. Hogrefe Publishing.
Borich, G. D. (2016). Observation skills for effective teaching. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Burhanuddin, N. A. N., Ahmad, N. A., Said, R. R., & Asimiran, S. (2019). A systematic review of the psychological capital (PsyCap) research development: Implementation and gaps. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(3), 133-150.
Buskist, W. (2002). Effective teaching: Perspectives and insights from division Two`s 2-and 4-year awardees. Teaching of Psychology, 29(3), 188-193.
Carifio, M. S., & Hess, A. K. (1987). Who is the ideal supervisor? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 244–250.
Caza, A., Bagozzi, R. P., Woolley, L., Levy, L., & Caza, B. (2010). Psychological capital and authentic leadership: Measurement, gender, and cultural extension. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2(1), 53-70.
Casad, S. S. (2015). Effect of psychological capital on elementary teacher stress and workplace affect. Old Dominion University.
Cogan, M. L. (1973). Clinical supervision. Bosten：Houghton Mifflin.
Coutu, D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard business review, 80(5), 46-56.
DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2008). Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development. Boston: Pearson.
DiPaola , M. F. , & Hoy , W. K. ( 2014 ) . Improving instruction through supervision , eval uation , and professional development . Charlotte , NC : Information Age Publish ing .
Eacute, J., & Esteve, M. (2000). The transformation of the teachers` role at the end of the twentieth century: New challenges for the future. Educational review, 52(2), 197-207.
Eradio, M. R. (2003). Tips to improve teaching effectiveness. Retrieved from http://hyper. vcsun.org/Hyper News/djordan/get/itaeffective.html
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2, 300–319.
Glanz, J., & Behar-Hornstein, L. S. (Eds.). (2000). Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
Glickman , C. D .. Gordon , S. P .. & Ross - Gordon , J. M. (2014) . Super Vision and in structional leadership A developmental approach ( 9th ed .) . New York , NY : Pearson.
Goldsmith, A. H., Veum, J. R., & Darity, W. (1997). The impact of psychological and human capital on wages. Economic Inquiry, 35, 15−829.
Grifith,M., & Grifith,I. (2002). Law of purchasing and supply (3rd ed.). Edinburg: Prrntice Hall.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct
dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.
Harris, B. M. (1976). Supervisor Competence and Strategies for Improving Instruction. Educational Leadership, 33(5), 332-5.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hayward, P. A. (2001). Students’ initial impressions of teaching effectiveness: Analysis of structured response items. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
Hosen, R., Solovey-Hosen, D., & Stern, L. (2003). Education and capital development: Capital as durable personal, social, economic and political influences on the happiness of individuals. Education, 123(3), 496-514.
Howard, F. (2008). Managing stress or enhancing well-being? Positive psychology’s contributions to clinical supervision. Australian Psychologist, 43, 105–113.
Hribar, D. C. (2016). Instructional effectiveness through assessment of student performance. Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1018&context=bollinger-rosado
Hung, C. L., & Li, F. C. (2017). Teacher perceptions of professional role and innovative teaching at elementary schools in Taiwan. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(21), 1036-1045.
Hutt, C. H., Scott, J., & King, M. (1983). A phenomenological study of supervisees` positive and negative experiences in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 20(1), 118.
Jackson, S. R., & Richard, M. M. (2007). Teacher’s Myers-Briggs personality profiles: Identifying effective teacher personality traits. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 432-441.
Jones, J. E., & Wade, J. C. (2015). Positive supervision and training. In J. C. Wade, L. I. Marks, & R. D. Hetzel (Eds.), Positive psychology on the college campus (pp. 191-217). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 86(1), 80.
Kalule, L., & Bouchamma, Y. (2013). Supervisors’ perception of instructional supervision. International studies in educational administration, 41(1), 89-104.
Karakus, M., & Demir, S. (2015). Psikolojik sermaye ile stress, tükenmişlik, kaygı, iş doyumu ve ise sargınlık arasındaki ilişki [The Relationship between Psychological Capital and Stress, Anxiety, Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Job Involvement]. Presented at II. International Eurasian Educational Research Congress, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TR.
Kristjánsson, K. (2012). Positive psychology and positive education: Old wine in new bottles?. Educational psychologist, 47(2), 86-105.
Larson, M. D., & Luthans, F ( 2006 ). Potential added value of psychological capital in predicting work attitude. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13 (2). 75-92.
Lowyck, J. (1994). Teaching effectiveness: An overview of studies. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 19(1), 17-25.
Luthans, F. (2002) Positivebrganizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 57-72.
Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: Beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 41(1), 45-50.
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social and now positive psychological capitalmanagement: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143‒160.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Li, W. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance. Management and Organization Review, 1, 247-269.
Luthans, F. (2005). Organizational behavior, 10th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Luthans, F.,Avey, J.B., and Avolio,B. J. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of organizational Behavior, 27,387−393.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541−572.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Malikow, M. (2006). Effective teacher study. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 16(3), 1-9.
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American psychologist, 56(3), 227-239.
Medley, D. M. (1982). Teacher effectiveness. In H. E. Mitzel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (5th ed.) (pp. 1841-1851). New York, NY: The Free.
Money, S. M. (1992). What Is Teaching Effectiveness? A Survey of Student and Teacher Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness. Retrieved from ERIC Database. (ED351056)
Mulkeen, A., Chapman, D.W., Dejaeghere, J. & Leu, E. (2007), Recruiting, Retraining and Retaining Secondary School Teachers and Head Teachers in Sub-Saharan Africa World Bank Working Paper 99 (Washington, DC: World Bank).
Mulyasa. (2009). Kompetensi dan Profesi Guru. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Nolan, J. F., & Hoover, L. A. (2004). Teacher supervision and evaluation.
Ornstein, A. C. & Lasley II, T. J. (2000). Strategiesfor effective teaching (3r ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Owens, R. G. (2004). Organizational behavior in education (8th ed). NJ: Prentice Hell.
Pascarelli, J. T., & Ponticell, J. A. (1994). Trust-blocking responses: Training materials developed for co-teaching.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate behavioral research, 42(1), 185-227.
Range, B., Duncan, H., & Hvidston, D. (2013). How faculty supervise and mentor pre-service teachers: Implications for principal supervision of novice teachers. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(2), 43-58.
Scheier. M. F. & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism. coping. and health: Assessment andimplications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology. 4(3) 219-247.
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454-499.
Seligman, M. (1998). Positive social science. APA Monitor, 29(2), 5.
Seligman, M.E.P. (2002) Authentic happiness: using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment (New York, Free Press)
Sergiovanni, T. & Starratt, R. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition. (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hil.
Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. (2001). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56(3), 216-217.
Staw, B. M., Sutton, R. I., and Pellod, L. H. (1994). Employee positive emotion and favorable outcomes at the workplace. Organizational Science, 5, 51–71.
Stronge, J., & Hindman, J. (2003). Hiring the best teachers. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 48-52.
Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2000). Supervision that improves teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2013). Supervision that improves teaching and learning: Strategies and techniques. Corwin Press.
Tettegah, S. (2002). Teachers, identity, psychological capital and electronically mediated representations of cultural consciousness. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1946-1947). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Tiger, L. (1979). Optimism: The biology of hope (p. 84).
Travers, C. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1994). Psychophysiological responses to teach stress: A move toward more objective methodologies. European Review o f Applied Psychology, 44(2), 137-146.
Tsai, M. H., Chang, S. H., Hsieh, M.C. (2016). The impact of Taiwan elementary principal’s distributed leadership and teacher’s emotional labor on teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics, 9(1), 67-88.
Tucker, P.D. & Pounder, D.G. (2010), Supervision and Personnel Administration, in E.L. Baker, B. McGraw & P.L. Peterson (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Education. 3rd edn (Oxford: Elsevier): 839–845.
Wade, J. C., & Jones, J. E. (2014). Strength-based clinical supervision: A positive psychology approach to clinical training. Springer Publishing Company.
Wiles, K., & Lovell, J. T. (1975). Supervision for better schools.
Woolfolk, H. A. (2004). Self-efficacy in college teaching. Retrieved from
http://www.asa.mnscu.edu/facultydevelopment/resources/pod/Packet4/selfeffic
acyincollegeteaching.htm
Wray, D., Medwell, J., Fox, R., & Poulson, L. (2000). The teaching practices of effective teachers of literacy. Educational Review, 52(1), 75-84.
Wu, R. T. (2005). Relationship between Teachers` Teaching Effectiveness and School Effectiveness in Comprehensive High Schools in Taiwan, Republic of China. Online Submission.
Xue, Z. (2014). Dilemma of Teachers’ Professional Development and Protective Countermeasures. In 3rd International Conference on Science and Social Research (ICSSR 2014). Atlantis Press.
Zepeda, S. (2017). Instructional supervision : applying tools and concepts / Sally J. Zepeda. (Fourth edition.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.		zh_TW