1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 氣候變遷導向街區開放空間規劃的挑戰與機會－臺北市經驗
The Challenges and Opportunities for Climate-changed-oriented Street Open Space Planning – Experiences from Taipei
作者 鍾佳諭
Chung, Chia-Yu
貢獻者 蔡育新
Tsai, Yu-Hsin
鍾佳諭
Chung, Chia-Yu
關鍵詞 街區開放空間
氣候變遷
自然為本
利害關係人分析
Stakeholder analysis
Street Open Space
Climate change
Nature-based Solution
日期 2022
上傳時間 1-Sep-2023 15:14:05 (UTC+8)
摘要 IPCC（2014; 2022）指出都市地區面臨氣候變遷之風險將逐步攀升，執行氣候變遷減緩、調適策略具一定之優勢和迫切性。然而，伴隨執行層面之不確定性，現階段仍較缺乏於都市建成環境中明確且可供操作之規劃工具，亦較缺乏鄰里尺度之回應策略。於此背景下，適逢現階段台灣都市建物普遍進入更新階段，透過重建並適用新的法令及規劃理念，將於都市內形成網絡狀分布之「街區開放空間」，若能搭配NBS理念、引導綠色交通之規劃，將成為都市建成環境回應氣候變遷之重要空間。
本研究結合先前相關研究之客觀資料，並聚焦於「因應氣候變遷為本之街區開放空間」三大層次中作為規劃工具之「規劃設計投入因子」層次。透過利害關係人訪談蒐集主觀資料，以理解此類空間從規劃設計至後續執行、維護管理階段等過程可能產生之議題，並分析有利於「因應氣候變遷為本之街區開放空間」執行之政策。
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has highlighted that urban areas face increasing risks due to climate change, making the implementation of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies imperative. However, uncertainties at the implementation level have led to a lack of clear and actionable planning tools for urban built environments, as well as a lack of strategies at neighborhood scale. In the context of Taiwan, urban buildings are currently undergoing widespread renewal, offering an opportunity to create a network of "climate-changed-oriented street open spaces" through reconstruction and the application of new regulations and planning concepts. By integrating “Nature-based Solutions (NbS)” and “green transportation planning”, these open spaces can become vital areas for responding to climate change in urban environments.

Within the three implementation levels of "climate-changed-oriented street open space ", this research combines objective data from previous relevant studies and focuses on the "climate-change-oriented planning/design input" level. Through interviews with stakeholders from public and private sectors, subjective data were collected to understand the potential issues arising from the planning, design, implementation, and maintenance stages of executing the concept of “Street Open Space（SOS）” and to analyze policies that support the implementation of "climate-change-oriented street open space" initiatives in the context of Taiwan urban areas.
參考文獻 中文參考文獻
1. 臺北市政府. (2019). 《擬定臺北市大眾運輸導向可申請開發許可地區細部計畫案》
2. 臺北市政府. (2016) 《台北市新建建築物綠化實施規則》
3. 國家發展委員會 （2018） 《地方氣候變遷調適計畫規劃作業指引（更新版）》
4. 內政部營建署. (2016). 《水環境低衝擊開發設施操作手冊》
5. 蔡育新, 徐嘉信, 王絢, & 林家靖. (2021). 因應氣候變遷之都市街區規劃設計策略與永續 [共效益]-建物重建階段. 都市與計劃, 48(1), 27-48
6. 徐嘉信，2020，「綠色基礎設施於都市『街區開放空間』對氣候變遷減緩與調適之綜效、權衡與共效益」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
7. 林家靖，2021，「都市『街區開放空間』重建階段『以自然為本（Nature-based Solutions, NBS）』規劃設計之氣候變遷綜效、權衡、共效益-社區道路」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
8. 蔡育新, 徐嘉信,林家靖. （2023）， 「街區開放空間」之氣候變遷規劃綜效與共效益-建物重建對主次要道路之驅動，都市與計劃, 50(2), 159～194
9. 林金定, 嚴嘉楓, & 陳美花. (2005). 質性研究方法: 訪談模式與實施步驟分析. 身心障礙研究季刊, 3(2), 122-136.
10. 陳向明. (2002). 社会科學質的硏究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
英文參考文獻
1. Ball, K., Bauman, A., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2001). Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Preventive medicine, 33(5), 434-440.
2. Barthélémy, C., & Armani, G. (2015). A comparison of social processes at three sites of the F rench R hône R iver subjected to ecological restoration. Freshwater Biology, 60(6), 1208-1220.
3. Bassett, E., & Shandas, V. (2010). Innovation and climate action planning: Perspectives from municipal plans. Journal of the American planning association, 76(4), 435-450.
4. Bauduceau, N., Berry, P., Cecchi, C., Elmqvist, T., Fernandez, M., Hartig, T., . . . Noring, L. (2015). Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on ‘nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities’. Publications Office of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium.
5. Bendict, M., & McMahon, E. (2006). Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities Island Press. Washington, DC.
6. Biesbroek, R., Dupuis, J., Jordan, A., Wellstead, A., Howlett, M., Cairney, P., . . . Davidson, D. (2015). Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 493-494.
7. Broto, V. C. (2017). Urban governance and the politics of climate change. World development, 93, 1-15.
8. Brugha, R., & Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health policy and planning, 15(3), 239-246.
9. Bulkeley, H. (2019). Managing environmental and energy transitions in cities: state of the art & emerging perspectives. Backgr. Pap. an OECD/EC Work, 7.
10. Bulkeley, H. A., Broto, V. C., & Edwards, G. A. (2014). An urban politics of climate change: experimentation and the governing of socio-technical transitions: Routledge.
11. Choi, C., Berry, P., & Smith, A. (2021). The climate benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs of green infrastructure: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Management, 291, 112583.
12. Davis, M., & Naumann, S. (2017). Making the case for sustainable urban drainage systems as a nature-based solution to urban flooding. In Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas (pp. 123-137): Springer, Cham.
13. Derkzen, M. L., van Teeffelen, A. J., & Verburg, P. H. (2017). Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation: How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences? Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 106-130.
14. Eliasson, I. (2000). The use of climate knowledge in urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(1-2), 31-44.
15. Ershad Sarabi, S., Han, Q., L Romme, A. G., de Vries, B., & Wendling, L. (2019). Key enablers of and barriers to the uptake and implementation of nature-based solutions in urban settings: a review. Resources, 8(3), 121.
16. Frantzeskaki, N., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Egermann, M., & Ehnert, F. (2017). Nature-based solutions accelerating urban sustainability transitions in cities: lessons from Dresden, Genk and Stockholm cities. In Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas (pp. 65-88): Springer, Cham.
17. Gray, J. D. E., O`Neill, K., & Qiu, Z. (2017). Coastal residents` perceptions of the function of and relationship between engineered and natural infrastructure for coastal hazard mitigation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 146, 144-156.
18. Han, S., & Kuhlicke, C. (2021). Barriers and Drivers for Mainstreaming Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Risks: The Case of South Korea. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 1-12.
19. Heazle, M., Tangney, P., Burton, P., Howes, M., Grant-Smith, D., Reis, K., & Bosomworth, K. (2013). Mainstreaming climate change adaptation: An incremental approach to disaster risk management in Australia. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 162-170.
20. Hwang, Y. H., Lum, Q. J. G., & Chan, Y. K. D. (2015). Micro-scale thermal performance of tropical urban parks in Singapore. Building and Environment, 94, 467-476.
21. Kabisch, N., Korn, H., Stadler, J., & Bonn, A. (2017). Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas: Linkages between science, policy and practice: Springer Nature.
22. Klemm, W., Lenzholzer, S., & van den Brink, A. (2017). Developing green infrastructure design guidelines for urban climate adaptation. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 12(3), 60-71.
23. Koc, C. B., Osmond, P., & Peters, A. (2017). Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies. Urban ecosystems, 20(1), 15-35.
24. Lafortezza, R., Carrus, G., Sanesi, G., & Davies, C. (2009). Benefits and well-being perceived by people visiting green spaces in periods of heat stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 97-108.
25. Lin, B. B., Ossola, A., Alberti, M., Andersson, E., Bai, X., Dobbs, C., . . . Fuller, R. A. (2021). Integrating solutions to adapt cities for climate change. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(7), e479-e486.
26. Lu, Y. (2019). Using Google Street View to investigate the association between street greenery and physical activity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103435.
27. Madsen, S. H. J., & Hansen, T. (2019). Cities and climate change–examining advantages and challenges of urban climate change experiments. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 282-299.
28. Matthews, T. (2013). Institutional perspectives on operationalising climate adaptation through planning. Planning theory & practice, 14(2), 198-210.
29. Matthews, T., Lo, A. Y., & Byrne, J. A. (2015). Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: Barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 155-163.
30. McPhearson, T., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12, 152-156.
31. Measham, T. G., Preston, B. L., Smith, T. F., Brooke, C., Gorddard, R., Withycombe, G., & Morrison, C. (2011). Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 16(8), 889-909.
32. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886.
33. Morgan-Davies, C., & Waterhouse, T. (2010). Future of the hills of Scotland: Stakeholders’ preferences for policy priorities. Land use policy, 27(2), 387-398.
34. Nesshöver, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A., Delbaere, B., . . . Kovacs, E. (2017). The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science of the total environment, 579, 1215-1227.
35. Norton, B. A., Coutts, A. M., Livesley, S. J., Harris, R. J., Hunter, A. M., & Williams, N. S. (2015). Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 127-138.
36. Pamukcu-Albers, P., Ugolini, F., La Rosa, D., Grădinaru, S. R., Azevedo, J. C., & Wu, J. (2021). Building green infrastructure to enhance urban resilience to climate change and pandemics. In: Springer.
37. Perry, J. (2015). Climate change adaptation in the world`s best places: A wicked problem in need of immediate attention. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 1-11.
38. Pontee, N., Narayan, S., Beck, M. W., & Hosking, A. H. (2016). Nature-based solutions: lessons from around the world. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering.
39. Raymond, C. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P., Breil, M., Nita, M. R., . . . Calfapietra, C. (2017). A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 15-24.
40. Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Heidrich, O., Church, J. M., Pietrapertosa, F., de Gregorio-Hurtado, S., . . . Lorencová, E. K. (2018). How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 207-219.
41. Rędzińska, K., & Piotrkowska, M. (2020). Urban Planning and Design for Building Neighborhood Resilience to Climate Change. Land, 9(10), 387.
42. Rosenberg, M., Mills, C., McCormack, G., Martin, K., Grove, B., Pratt, S., & Braham, R. (2010). Physical activity levels of Western Australian adults 2009: findings from the physical activity taskforce adult physical activity survey. Perth: Health Promotion Evaluation Unit, The University of Western Australia.
43. Runhaar, H., Wilk, B., Persson, Å., Uittenbroek, C., & Wamsler, C. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation: taking stock about “what works” from empirical research worldwide. Regional environmental change, 18(4), 1201-1210.
44. Sartison, K., & Artmann, M. (2020). Edible cities–An innovative nature-based solution for urban sustainability transformation? An explorative study of urban food production in German cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 49, 126604.
45. Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020). Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1794), 20190120.
46. Stults, M., & Larsen, L. (2020). Tackling uncertainty in US local climate adaptation planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 40(4), 416-431.
47. Torrens, J., & von Wirth, T. (2021). Experimentation or projectification of urban change? A critical appraisal and three steps forward. Urban Transformations, 3(1), 1-17.
48. Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Rosenzweig, C., Dawson, R. J., Rodriguez, R. S., Bai, X., Barau, A. S., . . . Dhakal, S. (2018). Locking in positive climate responses in cities. Nature Climate Change, 8(3), 174-177.
49. van der Jagt, A. P., Szaraz, L. R., Delshammar, T., Cvejić, R., Santos, A., Goodness, J., & Buijs, A. (2017). Cultivating nature-based solutions: The governance of communal urban gardens in the European Union. Environmental Research, 159, 264-275.
50. van Vliet, K., & Hammond, C. (2021). Residents’ perceptions of green infrastructure in the contemporary residential context: a study of Kingswood, Kingston-upon-Hull, England. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(1), 145-163.
51. Wagner, M., Mager, C., Schmidt, N., Kiese, N., & Growe, A. (2019). Conflicts about Urban Green Spaces in Metropolitan Areas under Conditions of Climate Change: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Planning Processes. Urban Science, 3(1), 15.
52. Wamsler, C., & Pauleit, S. (2016). Making headway in climate policy mainstreaming and ecosystem-based adaptation: two pioneering countries, different pathways, one goal. Climatic Change, 137(1), 71-87.
53. Williams, K., Gupta, R., Hopkins, D., Bramley, G., Payne, C., Gregg, M., . . . Musslewhite, C. (2012). Suburban Neighbourhood Adaptation for a Changing Climate (SNACC) Final Report.
54. IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A:
55. Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
56. O’Farrell, P. J., & Anderson, P. M. (2010). Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1-2), 59-65.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
109257007
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109257007
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蔡育新zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Tsai, Yu-Hsinen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鍾佳諭zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chung, Chia-Yuen_US
dc.creator (作者) 鍾佳諭zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chung, Chia-Yuen_US
dc.date (日期) 2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Sep-2023 15:14:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Sep-2023 15:14:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Sep-2023 15:14:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109257007en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146986-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 109257007zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) IPCC（2014; 2022）指出都市地區面臨氣候變遷之風險將逐步攀升，執行氣候變遷減緩、調適策略具一定之優勢和迫切性。然而，伴隨執行層面之不確定性，現階段仍較缺乏於都市建成環境中明確且可供操作之規劃工具，亦較缺乏鄰里尺度之回應策略。於此背景下，適逢現階段台灣都市建物普遍進入更新階段，透過重建並適用新的法令及規劃理念，將於都市內形成網絡狀分布之「街區開放空間」，若能搭配NBS理念、引導綠色交通之規劃，將成為都市建成環境回應氣候變遷之重要空間。
本研究結合先前相關研究之客觀資料，並聚焦於「因應氣候變遷為本之街區開放空間」三大層次中作為規劃工具之「規劃設計投入因子」層次。透過利害關係人訪談蒐集主觀資料，以理解此類空間從規劃設計至後續執行、維護管理階段等過程可能產生之議題，並分析有利於「因應氣候變遷為本之街區開放空間」執行之政策。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has highlighted that urban areas face increasing risks due to climate change, making the implementation of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies imperative. However, uncertainties at the implementation level have led to a lack of clear and actionable planning tools for urban built environments, as well as a lack of strategies at neighborhood scale. In the context of Taiwan, urban buildings are currently undergoing widespread renewal, offering an opportunity to create a network of "climate-changed-oriented street open spaces" through reconstruction and the application of new regulations and planning concepts. By integrating “Nature-based Solutions (NbS)” and “green transportation planning”, these open spaces can become vital areas for responding to climate change in urban environments.

Within the three implementation levels of "climate-changed-oriented street open space ", this research combines objective data from previous relevant studies and focuses on the "climate-change-oriented planning/design input" level. Through interviews with stakeholders from public and private sectors, subjective data were collected to understand the potential issues arising from the planning, design, implementation, and maintenance stages of executing the concept of “Street Open Space（SOS）” and to analyze policies that support the implementation of "climate-change-oriented street open space" initiatives in the context of Taiwan urban areas.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的
一、 研究動機
二、 研究目的
第二節 研究內容
一、 文獻回顧
二、 利害關係人分析
第三節 研究方法與架構
一、 研究方法與工具
二、 研究架構
第二章 文獻回顧 9
第一節 「街區開放空間」定義與因應氣候變遷功能
一、 街區開放空間之定義及規劃設計投入因子
二、 街區開放空間作為都市回應氣候變遷議題之重要性
第二節 「街區開放空間」相關研究
一、 因應氣候變遷規劃設計投入因子之落實現況
第三節 NBS(Nature-based Solution)理念納入街區開放空間之重要性
一、 以自然為本（NBS)之定義以及與因應氣候變遷之關聯
二、 都市規劃領域的調適主流化（Adaptation Mainstreaming）
三、 推行NBS過程之阻礙以及利害關係人
第四節 氣候變遷調適行動下的利害關係人分析
一、 利害關係人可能影響都市調適行動方向與內容
二、 利害關係人與綠色基盤設施之相關研究
第三章 研究設計 35
第一節 利害關係人分類與抽樣
一、 利害關係人分層分類架構與抽樣
第二節 利害關係人半結構式訪談題綱設計
一、 訪談題綱設計
二、 訪談形式
第三節 研究方法
一、 半結構式訪談
二、 類屬分析
第四章 實施氣候變遷導向的街區開放空間之機會與挑戰 44
第一節 寬度規模之提升轉型
一、 機會
二、 挑戰
三、 因應作法
第二節 於街區空間落實NBS規劃設計因子
一、 機會
二、 挑戰
三、 因應作法
第三節 引導綠色交通導向之規劃
一、 機會
二、 挑戰
三、 因應作法
第五章 結論與建議 87
第一節 結論
第二節 政策建議與研究限制
一、 政策建議
二、 研究限制
三、 後續研究建議
參考文獻 91
附錄 1：因應氣候變遷之街區空間規劃—依寬度規模之不同
附錄 2：公部門訪談題綱
附錄 3：訪談輔助圖說
附錄 4：訪談輔助圖說（使用者版本）		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 7546876 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109257007en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 街區開放空間zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 氣候變遷zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自然為本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 利害關係人分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Stakeholder analysisen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Street Open Spaceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Climate changeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Nature-based Solutionen_US
dc.title (題名) 氣候變遷導向街區開放空間規劃的挑戰與機會－臺北市經驗zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Challenges and Opportunities for Climate-changed-oriented Street Open Space Planning – Experiences from Taipeien_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文參考文獻
1. 臺北市政府. (2019). 《擬定臺北市大眾運輸導向可申請開發許可地區細部計畫案》
2. 臺北市政府. (2016) 《台北市新建建築物綠化實施規則》
3. 國家發展委員會 （2018） 《地方氣候變遷調適計畫規劃作業指引（更新版）》
4. 內政部營建署. (2016). 《水環境低衝擊開發設施操作手冊》
5. 蔡育新, 徐嘉信, 王絢, & 林家靖. (2021). 因應氣候變遷之都市街區規劃設計策略與永續 [共效益]-建物重建階段. 都市與計劃, 48(1), 27-48
6. 徐嘉信，2020，「綠色基礎設施於都市『街區開放空間』對氣候變遷減緩與調適之綜效、權衡與共效益」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
7. 林家靖，2021，「都市『街區開放空間』重建階段『以自然為本（Nature-based Solutions, NBS）』規劃設計之氣候變遷綜效、權衡、共效益-社區道路」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
8. 蔡育新, 徐嘉信,林家靖. （2023）， 「街區開放空間」之氣候變遷規劃綜效與共效益-建物重建對主次要道路之驅動，都市與計劃, 50(2), 159～194
9. 林金定, 嚴嘉楓, & 陳美花. (2005). 質性研究方法: 訪談模式與實施步驟分析. 身心障礙研究季刊, 3(2), 122-136.
10. 陳向明. (2002). 社会科學質的硏究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
英文參考文獻
1. Ball, K., Bauman, A., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2001). Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Preventive medicine, 33(5), 434-440.
2. Barthélémy, C., & Armani, G. (2015). A comparison of social processes at three sites of the F rench R hône R iver subjected to ecological restoration. Freshwater Biology, 60(6), 1208-1220.
3. Bassett, E., & Shandas, V. (2010). Innovation and climate action planning: Perspectives from municipal plans. Journal of the American planning association, 76(4), 435-450.
4. Bauduceau, N., Berry, P., Cecchi, C., Elmqvist, T., Fernandez, M., Hartig, T., . . . Noring, L. (2015). Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on ‘nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities’. Publications Office of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium.
5. Bendict, M., & McMahon, E. (2006). Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities Island Press. Washington, DC.
6. Biesbroek, R., Dupuis, J., Jordan, A., Wellstead, A., Howlett, M., Cairney, P., . . . Davidson, D. (2015). Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 493-494.
7. Broto, V. C. (2017). Urban governance and the politics of climate change. World development, 93, 1-15.
8. Brugha, R., & Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health policy and planning, 15(3), 239-246.
9. Bulkeley, H. (2019). Managing environmental and energy transitions in cities: state of the art & emerging perspectives. Backgr. Pap. an OECD/EC Work, 7.
10. Bulkeley, H. A., Broto, V. C., & Edwards, G. A. (2014). An urban politics of climate change: experimentation and the governing of socio-technical transitions: Routledge.
11. Choi, C., Berry, P., & Smith, A. (2021). The climate benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs of green infrastructure: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Management, 291, 112583.
12. Davis, M., & Naumann, S. (2017). Making the case for sustainable urban drainage systems as a nature-based solution to urban flooding. In Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas (pp. 123-137): Springer, Cham.
13. Derkzen, M. L., van Teeffelen, A. J., & Verburg, P. H. (2017). Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation: How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences? Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 106-130.
14. Eliasson, I. (2000). The use of climate knowledge in urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(1-2), 31-44.
15. Ershad Sarabi, S., Han, Q., L Romme, A. G., de Vries, B., & Wendling, L. (2019). Key enablers of and barriers to the uptake and implementation of nature-based solutions in urban settings: a review. Resources, 8(3), 121.
16. Frantzeskaki, N., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Egermann, M., & Ehnert, F. (2017). Nature-based solutions accelerating urban sustainability transitions in cities: lessons from Dresden, Genk and Stockholm cities. In Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas (pp. 65-88): Springer, Cham.
17. Gray, J. D. E., O`Neill, K., & Qiu, Z. (2017). Coastal residents` perceptions of the function of and relationship between engineered and natural infrastructure for coastal hazard mitigation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 146, 144-156.
18. Han, S., & Kuhlicke, C. (2021). Barriers and Drivers for Mainstreaming Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Risks: The Case of South Korea. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 1-12.
19. Heazle, M., Tangney, P., Burton, P., Howes, M., Grant-Smith, D., Reis, K., & Bosomworth, K. (2013). Mainstreaming climate change adaptation: An incremental approach to disaster risk management in Australia. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 162-170.
20. Hwang, Y. H., Lum, Q. J. G., & Chan, Y. K. D. (2015). Micro-scale thermal performance of tropical urban parks in Singapore. Building and Environment, 94, 467-476.
21. Kabisch, N., Korn, H., Stadler, J., & Bonn, A. (2017). Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas: Linkages between science, policy and practice: Springer Nature.
22. Klemm, W., Lenzholzer, S., & van den Brink, A. (2017). Developing green infrastructure design guidelines for urban climate adaptation. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 12(3), 60-71.
23. Koc, C. B., Osmond, P., & Peters, A. (2017). Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies. Urban ecosystems, 20(1), 15-35.
24. Lafortezza, R., Carrus, G., Sanesi, G., & Davies, C. (2009). Benefits and well-being perceived by people visiting green spaces in periods of heat stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 97-108.
25. Lin, B. B., Ossola, A., Alberti, M., Andersson, E., Bai, X., Dobbs, C., . . . Fuller, R. A. (2021). Integrating solutions to adapt cities for climate change. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(7), e479-e486.
26. Lu, Y. (2019). Using Google Street View to investigate the association between street greenery and physical activity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103435.
27. Madsen, S. H. J., & Hansen, T. (2019). Cities and climate change–examining advantages and challenges of urban climate change experiments. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 282-299.
28. Matthews, T. (2013). Institutional perspectives on operationalising climate adaptation through planning. Planning theory & practice, 14(2), 198-210.
29. Matthews, T., Lo, A. Y., & Byrne, J. A. (2015). Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: Barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 155-163.
30. McPhearson, T., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12, 152-156.
31. Measham, T. G., Preston, B. L., Smith, T. F., Brooke, C., Gorddard, R., Withycombe, G., & Morrison, C. (2011). Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 16(8), 889-909.
32. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886.
33. Morgan-Davies, C., & Waterhouse, T. (2010). Future of the hills of Scotland: Stakeholders’ preferences for policy priorities. Land use policy, 27(2), 387-398.
34. Nesshöver, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A., Delbaere, B., . . . Kovacs, E. (2017). The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science of the total environment, 579, 1215-1227.
35. Norton, B. A., Coutts, A. M., Livesley, S. J., Harris, R. J., Hunter, A. M., & Williams, N. S. (2015). Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 127-138.
36. Pamukcu-Albers, P., Ugolini, F., La Rosa, D., Grădinaru, S. R., Azevedo, J. C., & Wu, J. (2021). Building green infrastructure to enhance urban resilience to climate change and pandemics. In: Springer.
37. Perry, J. (2015). Climate change adaptation in the world`s best places: A wicked problem in need of immediate attention. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 1-11.
38. Pontee, N., Narayan, S., Beck, M. W., & Hosking, A. H. (2016). Nature-based solutions: lessons from around the world. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering.
39. Raymond, C. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P., Breil, M., Nita, M. R., . . . Calfapietra, C. (2017). A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 15-24.
40. Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Heidrich, O., Church, J. M., Pietrapertosa, F., de Gregorio-Hurtado, S., . . . Lorencová, E. K. (2018). How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 207-219.
41. Rędzińska, K., & Piotrkowska, M. (2020). Urban Planning and Design for Building Neighborhood Resilience to Climate Change. Land, 9(10), 387.
42. Rosenberg, M., Mills, C., McCormack, G., Martin, K., Grove, B., Pratt, S., & Braham, R. (2010). Physical activity levels of Western Australian adults 2009: findings from the physical activity taskforce adult physical activity survey. Perth: Health Promotion Evaluation Unit, The University of Western Australia.
43. Runhaar, H., Wilk, B., Persson, Å., Uittenbroek, C., & Wamsler, C. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation: taking stock about “what works” from empirical research worldwide. Regional environmental change, 18(4), 1201-1210.
44. Sartison, K., & Artmann, M. (2020). Edible cities–An innovative nature-based solution for urban sustainability transformation? An explorative study of urban food production in German cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 49, 126604.
45. Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020). Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1794), 20190120.
46. Stults, M., & Larsen, L. (2020). Tackling uncertainty in US local climate adaptation planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 40(4), 416-431.
47. Torrens, J., & von Wirth, T. (2021). Experimentation or projectification of urban change? A critical appraisal and three steps forward. Urban Transformations, 3(1), 1-17.
48. Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Rosenzweig, C., Dawson, R. J., Rodriguez, R. S., Bai, X., Barau, A. S., . . . Dhakal, S. (2018). Locking in positive climate responses in cities. Nature Climate Change, 8(3), 174-177.
49. van der Jagt, A. P., Szaraz, L. R., Delshammar, T., Cvejić, R., Santos, A., Goodness, J., & Buijs, A. (2017). Cultivating nature-based solutions: The governance of communal urban gardens in the European Union. Environmental Research, 159, 264-275.
50. van Vliet, K., & Hammond, C. (2021). Residents’ perceptions of green infrastructure in the contemporary residential context: a study of Kingswood, Kingston-upon-Hull, England. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(1), 145-163.
51. Wagner, M., Mager, C., Schmidt, N., Kiese, N., & Growe, A. (2019). Conflicts about Urban Green Spaces in Metropolitan Areas under Conditions of Climate Change: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Planning Processes. Urban Science, 3(1), 15.
52. Wamsler, C., & Pauleit, S. (2016). Making headway in climate policy mainstreaming and ecosystem-based adaptation: two pioneering countries, different pathways, one goal. Climatic Change, 137(1), 71-87.
53. Williams, K., Gupta, R., Hopkins, D., Bramley, G., Payne, C., Gregg, M., . . . Musslewhite, C. (2012). Suburban Neighbourhood Adaptation for a Changing Climate (SNACC) Final Report.
54. IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A:
55. Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
56. O’Farrell, P. J., & Anderson, P. M. (2010). Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1-2), 59-65.		zh_TW