1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 大學培育社會創業的角色與功能
Roles and Functions of Universities in Cultivating Social Entrepreneurship
作者 洪新翰
Hung, Hsin-Han
貢獻者 蔡培元
Tsai, Pei-Yuan
洪新翰
Hung, Hsin-Han
關鍵詞 社會創業
大學
創業培育
育成中心
孵化
Social Entrepreneurship
University
Entrepreneurial Cultivation
Incubation Center
Incubation
日期 2023
上傳時間 1-Sep-2023 15:46:46 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在發展大學脈絡中關於社會創業的研究，探討大學在培育社會創業 的角色與做法、大學對於培育社會創業的優劣勢、大學在培育社會創業過程中的 改善空間。本研究採用質性研究，透過立意抽樣與滾學球的方式，邀請十位具備 與社會創業相關經驗的培育工作者與社會創業成員來進行深度訪談。研究發現: 一、隨著大學的定位變化與社會創業的討論發展，大學會在四個培育社會創業的 階段中提供支持與協助，該四階段為啟蒙階段、實踐階段、草創階段、穩定階段， 並且大學擁有多元的資源來協助這些階段的發展，包含人力、學術專業、技術、 財務、實踐場域等種類;育成中心孵化資源與計畫性資源則是兩種主要的資源途 徑;二、大學在培育過程中具備的優勢包含大學能作為媒合資源的平台、引導與 資訊統合的能力、跨域合作的可能性、提供實務操作的機會、提高社會創業團隊 的曝光度、提供夠用的時間、提供試錯的機會、心理支持等;相反地，其挑戰則 來自於社會創業本質容易致使培育難度增加、學生投入社會創業所面臨的困境、 學校層體制上的限制，以及社會創業孵化的過程中會遇到的限制等議題;三、大 學在學生、學校與創業孵化的層面皆還有一些改善空間，可以作為未來大學在培 育社會創業過程中的調整方向。研究建議:一、大學在社會創業培育階段中應做 出相對應的調整;二、社會創業的培育可以結合社工專業的發展。
This research aims to explore social entrepreneurship within the university context. The discussion delves into three aspects, including (1) the role of universities and their approaches to social entrepreneurship, (2) the advantages and disadvantages associated with their involvement, and (3) areas for improvement within social entrepreneurship cultivation processes. A qualitative approach is adopted for this study, and ten interviewees were selected through purposive and snowball sampling for in-depth interviews. The research findings are as follows: (1) Role of Universities: As universities have embraced social entrepreneurship and increased their focus on it, they have taken on a more active role in cultivating social entrepreneurship initiatives. They provide diverse resources across four key stages: enlightenment, practice, initiation, and steadiness. These encompass human resources, professional academic resources, technical requirements, financial support, and fields for practice as the main categories of resources. On top of that, two primary avenues for resource acquisition stand out: the services provided by incubation centers and structured program resources. (2) Advantages and Disadvantages of Universities in the Social Entrepreneurship Context: Universities offer several advantages in cultivating social entrepreneurship. These include the capability to serve as a platform to connect with diverse resources, the ability to guide and integrate information, interdisciplinary collaboration opportunities, hands-on practical experience, increased exposure to social entrepreneurship teams, sufficient time for implementing practices, room for trial and error, and valuable mental support. However, it is important to note that challenges can arise due to the inherent nature of social entrepreneurship, as well as issues related to students, schools, and the incubation process. (3) Spaces for Improvement: The study identifies three areas where universities can enhance their social entrepreneurship cultivation processes: student involvement, school adjustment, and entrepreneurial incubation. The researcher suggests that: (1) Universities should make corresponding adjustments during the social entrepreneurship cultivation stages (2) The cultivation of social entrepreneurship in universities can be integrated with the development of social work professions.
參考文獻 壹、中文文獻
王文科、王智弘(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰師大教育學報，17，29- 50。
江明修、張浩榕(2020)。從「社會企業」到「社會創新」之政策變遷分析:多 元流程模型的觀點。文官制度季刊，12(2)，1-34。
行政院(2014)。社會企業行動方案。取自
http://10156659.myku.tw/k/10156659/m/20151002205239.pdf
行政院(2018)。社會創新行動方案。取自
https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/CAFCE37E3CEAAB06?A=C
邢瑜(2015)。台灣社會企業的認知與圖像建構。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策 學系碩士論文。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/da5gg7。
社企流(2018)。社企流 iLab 社會企業育成計畫 2014-2018 成果報告。取自
https://issuu.com/seinsights/docs/____-_____-compressed
官有垣、王仕圖(2013)。台灣社會企業的能力建構與社會影響初探。社區發展 季刊，143，51-67。
邱昕歈(2017)。太陽花運動的背景、發生原因與影響。國立臺灣師範大學東亞 學系碩士論文。
長榮大學創新育成中心(2020)。社企輔導機制:社企方舟策略聯盟。取自
https://dweb.cjcu.edu.tw/coii/article/4466
施淑惠(2013)。當前政府推動社會企業的規劃與做法。社區發展季刊，143，7- 18。
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的 18 堂課—首航初探之旅。高雄市:麗文。 教育部(2022)。111 學年度大專院校一覽表。取自 https://ulist.moe.gov.tw/Query/AjaxQuery
陳瑋慈(2017)。社會企業行動方案建平臺之政策執行研究─以育成輔導平臺為 例。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/un2kdz。
曾晴婉(2018)。社會企業對婦女扶貧之影響—以家扶基金會發展社會企業為 例，第十屆發展研究年會台灣經驗 2.0:在地與全球的發展研究與實踐 2018，台北。
國立中央大學尤努斯社會企業中心(2018)。中心發展概況。取自
https://sbc.mgt.ncu.edu.tw/
彭東誠(2021)。學生社會企業創業與學校支持:萌芽、孵化與營運—「活源行 銷」的案例研究。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。取自 https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0017- 0607202114483600
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究—理論與應用。臺北市:心理。 鄭勝分(2007)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報，7，65-107。 劉育欣、鄭勝分(2014)。非營利組織商業化到社會企業化:身心障礙者就業模
式的轉化。身心障礙研究，12(1)，54-66。 魏玉立(2016)。[政務官特輯八十七] 催生青創、社企的「政委媽媽」:馮燕。
取自 https://www.1111.com.tw/news/jobns/93719 KPMG(2023)。社會企業服務。取自
https://kpmg.com/tw/zh/home/insights/2016/07/social-enterprise-service.html

貳、外文文獻
Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Virtue ventures LLC, 12(1), 1-124. Bloom, G. M. (2006). The Social Entrepreneurship Collaboratory (SE Lab): A University Incubator for a Rising Generation of Leading Social Entrepreneurs.
The Hauser Center for Non-profit Organizations and The John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University. Working Paper No. 31, Harvard University.
Carrera, D., Menuguzzo, M., & Messina, A. (2006). Social Enterprise Incubators: the Italian Experience. Mimeo.
Carroll, A. B. (1991), The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39–48.
Cetindamar, D. (2016). A new role for universities: Technology transfer for social innovations. Paper delivered at 2016 Proceeding of PICMET’16: Technology Management for Social Innovation, Hawaii. Retrieved from http://www.picmet.org/db/member/proceedings/2016/data/polopoly_fs/1.325168 6.1472158189!/fileserver/file/680904/filename/16R0019.pdf
Chen, S. H., Nasongkhla, J., & Donaldson, A. J. (2015). University Social Responsibility (USR): Identifying an Ethical Foundation within Higher Education Institutions. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 165-172.
Defourny, J., & Kim, S. Y., (2011). Emerging models of social enterprise in Eastern Asia: A Cross-Country Analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), 86-111.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
Freeman, Edward, R (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, New York: Basic Books.
Freeman, R. E., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 7–15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev
Kuan, Y. Y., & Wang, S. T. (2015). Social Enterprise in Taiwan. ICSEM Working Papers No.13, Liege: The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.
Littlewood, D., & Holt, D. (2018). Social entrepreneurship and CSR theory: insights, application and value. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322166925_Social_Entrepreneurship_a nd_CSR_Theory_Insights_Application_and_Value
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.48558/TSAV-FG11
Matheson, K. (2008). How Universities Can Enable Social Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review. Retrieved from http://timreview.ca/article/188
McBeth, C. H. (2018). Social Innovation in Higher Education: The Emergence and Evolution of Social Impact Centers. University of Pennsylvania.
Mendes, A. (2013). Why are incubators important for social innovation? Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303692804_Why_are_incubators_impo
rtant_for_social_innovation
Nascimento, L. D. S., Fernandes, B., & Salazar, V. (2020). Social incubation: Strategic benefits for social enterprise. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 18, 163-177.
Nicholls, A., Simon, J., Gabriel, M. (2015). Introduction: Dimensions of Social Innovation. In: Nicholls, A., Simon, J., Gabriel, M. (Eds), New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research (pp. 1-26). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801_1
Nicolopoulou, K., Karatas-Özkan, M., Vas, C., & Nouman, M. (2017). An incubation perspective on social innovation: The London Hub as a social incubator. R&D Management, 47(3), 368-384. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12179
Nino, A. C. S. (2015). Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences and Points in Common. Journal of Business & Economic Policy, 2(2), 85-93.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Policy Brief on Social Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Activities in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Social%20entrepreneurship%20policy%20brief% 20EN_FINAL.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Social entrepreneurship & Social enterprises. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/social-economy/social-entrepreneurship.htm
Păunescu, C., Drăgan, D., Cantaragiu, R., & Filculescu, A. (2013). Towards a Conceptualization of Social Entrepreneurship in Higher Education, The International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology, 10, 51-69.
Ramos-Monge, E. L., Llinás-Audet, X., & Barrena-Martinez, J. (2017). Universities as Corporate Entities: The Role of Social Responsibility in Their Strategic Management. In: Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali (Eds.), Corporate Governance and Strategic Decision Making. London: IntechOpen.
DOI:10.5772/intechopen.69931.
Robinson, J. (2006). Navigating social and institutional barriers to markets: How
social entrepreneurs identify and evaluate opportunities. In: J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 95-120). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sahu, D. (2018). Social enterprise incubator- An emerging model of social innovation system development in India. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/10223930/Social_Enterprise_Incubator_An_Emergin g_Model_of_Social_Innovation_System_Development_in_India
Santos, F. M., (2012). A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335-351.
Sepulveda, L. (2015). Social enterprise: A new phenomenon in the field of economic and social welfare. Social Policy and Administration, 49(7), 842-861.
Sour, P. (2020). Social Innovation in the USA: A Landscape Analysis of Social Enterprises Incubators. Retrieved from: https://www.engineeringforchange.org/research/social-innovation-usa-landscape- analysis-social-enterprise-incubators/
United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs. (2023). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
Vasilescu, R., Barna, C., Epure, M., & Baicu, C. (2010). Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4177-4187.
Wagid, Z., & Oliver, H. (2017). Cultivating Social Entrepreneurial Capacities in Students through Film: Implications for Social Entrepreneurship Education.
Educational Research for Social Change, 5(2), 76-100.
Yunus, M. (2008). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of
capitalism. Global Urban Development, 4(2), 1-19. Retrieved from https://www.globalurban.org/GUDMag08Vol4Iss2/Yunus.pdf
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
社會工作研究所
105264015
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105264015
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蔡培元zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Tsai, Pei-Yuanen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 洪新翰zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hung, Hsin-Hanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 洪新翰zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hung, Hsin-Hanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2023en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Sep-2023 15:46:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Sep-2023 15:46:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Sep-2023 15:46:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0105264015en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147124-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 社會工作研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 105264015zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在發展大學脈絡中關於社會創業的研究，探討大學在培育社會創業 的角色與做法、大學對於培育社會創業的優劣勢、大學在培育社會創業過程中的 改善空間。本研究採用質性研究，透過立意抽樣與滾學球的方式，邀請十位具備 與社會創業相關經驗的培育工作者與社會創業成員來進行深度訪談。研究發現: 一、隨著大學的定位變化與社會創業的討論發展，大學會在四個培育社會創業的 階段中提供支持與協助，該四階段為啟蒙階段、實踐階段、草創階段、穩定階段， 並且大學擁有多元的資源來協助這些階段的發展，包含人力、學術專業、技術、 財務、實踐場域等種類;育成中心孵化資源與計畫性資源則是兩種主要的資源途 徑;二、大學在培育過程中具備的優勢包含大學能作為媒合資源的平台、引導與 資訊統合的能力、跨域合作的可能性、提供實務操作的機會、提高社會創業團隊 的曝光度、提供夠用的時間、提供試錯的機會、心理支持等;相反地，其挑戰則 來自於社會創業本質容易致使培育難度增加、學生投入社會創業所面臨的困境、 學校層體制上的限制，以及社會創業孵化的過程中會遇到的限制等議題;三、大 學在學生、學校與創業孵化的層面皆還有一些改善空間，可以作為未來大學在培 育社會創業過程中的調整方向。研究建議:一、大學在社會創業培育階段中應做 出相對應的調整;二、社會創業的培育可以結合社工專業的發展。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This research aims to explore social entrepreneurship within the university context. The discussion delves into three aspects, including (1) the role of universities and their approaches to social entrepreneurship, (2) the advantages and disadvantages associated with their involvement, and (3) areas for improvement within social entrepreneurship cultivation processes. A qualitative approach is adopted for this study, and ten interviewees were selected through purposive and snowball sampling for in-depth interviews. The research findings are as follows: (1) Role of Universities: As universities have embraced social entrepreneurship and increased their focus on it, they have taken on a more active role in cultivating social entrepreneurship initiatives. They provide diverse resources across four key stages: enlightenment, practice, initiation, and steadiness. These encompass human resources, professional academic resources, technical requirements, financial support, and fields for practice as the main categories of resources. On top of that, two primary avenues for resource acquisition stand out: the services provided by incubation centers and structured program resources. (2) Advantages and Disadvantages of Universities in the Social Entrepreneurship Context: Universities offer several advantages in cultivating social entrepreneurship. These include the capability to serve as a platform to connect with diverse resources, the ability to guide and integrate information, interdisciplinary collaboration opportunities, hands-on practical experience, increased exposure to social entrepreneurship teams, sufficient time for implementing practices, room for trial and error, and valuable mental support. However, it is important to note that challenges can arise due to the inherent nature of social entrepreneurship, as well as issues related to students, schools, and the incubation process. (3) Spaces for Improvement: The study identifies three areas where universities can enhance their social entrepreneurship cultivation processes: student involvement, school adjustment, and entrepreneurial incubation. The researcher suggests that: (1) Universities should make corresponding adjustments during the social entrepreneurship cultivation stages (2) The cultivation of social entrepreneurship in universities can be integrated with the development of social work professions.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 01
第一節 研究背景 01
第二節 研究目的與研究問題 05
第二章 文獻探討 07
第一節 社會創業的概念及其在台灣的發展 07
第二節 大學培育社會創業的策略與方式 18
第三節 社會創業培育的優勢與挑戰 25
第三章 研究方法 29
第一節 研究設計 29
第二節 資料蒐集方法與研究對象 29
第三節 資料分析方法 30
第四節 資料嚴謹度 31
第五節 研究倫理 32
第四章 研究結果 35
第一節 大學培育社會創業的角色與做法 35
第二節 大學對於社會創業培育過程之優劣勢 58
第三節 大學在社會創業培育過程中的改善空間 75
第五章 結論與建議 83
第一節 研究結論 83
第二節 研究建議 90
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 95
參考文獻 97
附錄一 訪談大綱:社會創業成員 104
附錄二 訪談大綱:培育工作者 105
附錄三 知情同意書 106		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1955175 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105264015en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會創業zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 大學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 創業培育zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 育成中心zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 孵化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Entrepreneurshipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Universityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Entrepreneurial Cultivationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Incubation Centeren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Incubationen_US
dc.title (題名) 大學培育社會創業的角色與功能zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Roles and Functions of Universities in Cultivating Social Entrepreneurshipen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文文獻
王文科、王智弘(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰師大教育學報，17，29- 50。
江明修、張浩榕(2020)。從「社會企業」到「社會創新」之政策變遷分析:多 元流程模型的觀點。文官制度季刊，12(2)，1-34。
行政院(2014)。社會企業行動方案。取自
http://10156659.myku.tw/k/10156659/m/20151002205239.pdf
行政院(2018)。社會創新行動方案。取自
https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/CAFCE37E3CEAAB06?A=C
邢瑜(2015)。台灣社會企業的認知與圖像建構。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策 學系碩士論文。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/da5gg7。
社企流(2018)。社企流 iLab 社會企業育成計畫 2014-2018 成果報告。取自
https://issuu.com/seinsights/docs/____-_____-compressed
官有垣、王仕圖(2013)。台灣社會企業的能力建構與社會影響初探。社區發展 季刊，143，51-67。
邱昕歈(2017)。太陽花運動的背景、發生原因與影響。國立臺灣師範大學東亞 學系碩士論文。
長榮大學創新育成中心(2020)。社企輔導機制:社企方舟策略聯盟。取自
https://dweb.cjcu.edu.tw/coii/article/4466
施淑惠(2013)。當前政府推動社會企業的規劃與做法。社區發展季刊，143，7- 18。
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的 18 堂課—首航初探之旅。高雄市:麗文。 教育部(2022)。111 學年度大專院校一覽表。取自 https://ulist.moe.gov.tw/Query/AjaxQuery
陳瑋慈(2017)。社會企業行動方案建平臺之政策執行研究─以育成輔導平臺為 例。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/un2kdz。
曾晴婉(2018)。社會企業對婦女扶貧之影響—以家扶基金會發展社會企業為 例，第十屆發展研究年會台灣經驗 2.0:在地與全球的發展研究與實踐 2018，台北。
國立中央大學尤努斯社會企業中心(2018)。中心發展概況。取自
https://sbc.mgt.ncu.edu.tw/
彭東誠(2021)。學生社會企業創業與學校支持:萌芽、孵化與營運—「活源行 銷」的案例研究。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。取自 https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0017- 0607202114483600
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究—理論與應用。臺北市:心理。 鄭勝分(2007)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報，7，65-107。 劉育欣、鄭勝分(2014)。非營利組織商業化到社會企業化:身心障礙者就業模
式的轉化。身心障礙研究，12(1)，54-66。 魏玉立(2016)。[政務官特輯八十七] 催生青創、社企的「政委媽媽」:馮燕。
取自 https://www.1111.com.tw/news/jobns/93719 KPMG(2023)。社會企業服務。取自
https://kpmg.com/tw/zh/home/insights/2016/07/social-enterprise-service.html

貳、外文文獻
Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Virtue ventures LLC, 12(1), 1-124. Bloom, G. M. (2006). The Social Entrepreneurship Collaboratory (SE Lab): A University Incubator for a Rising Generation of Leading Social Entrepreneurs.
The Hauser Center for Non-profit Organizations and The John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University. Working Paper No. 31, Harvard University.
Carrera, D., Menuguzzo, M., & Messina, A. (2006). Social Enterprise Incubators: the Italian Experience. Mimeo.
Carroll, A. B. (1991), The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39–48.
Cetindamar, D. (2016). A new role for universities: Technology transfer for social innovations. Paper delivered at 2016 Proceeding of PICMET’16: Technology Management for Social Innovation, Hawaii. Retrieved from http://www.picmet.org/db/member/proceedings/2016/data/polopoly_fs/1.325168 6.1472158189!/fileserver/file/680904/filename/16R0019.pdf
Chen, S. H., Nasongkhla, J., & Donaldson, A. J. (2015). University Social Responsibility (USR): Identifying an Ethical Foundation within Higher Education Institutions. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 165-172.
Defourny, J., & Kim, S. Y., (2011). Emerging models of social enterprise in Eastern Asia: A Cross-Country Analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1), 86-111.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
Freeman, Edward, R (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, New York: Basic Books.
Freeman, R. E., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 7–15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev
Kuan, Y. Y., & Wang, S. T. (2015). Social Enterprise in Taiwan. ICSEM Working Papers No.13, Liege: The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.
Littlewood, D., & Holt, D. (2018). Social entrepreneurship and CSR theory: insights, application and value. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322166925_Social_Entrepreneurship_a nd_CSR_Theory_Insights_Application_and_Value
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.48558/TSAV-FG11
Matheson, K. (2008). How Universities Can Enable Social Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review. Retrieved from http://timreview.ca/article/188
McBeth, C. H. (2018). Social Innovation in Higher Education: The Emergence and Evolution of Social Impact Centers. University of Pennsylvania.
Mendes, A. (2013). Why are incubators important for social innovation? Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303692804_Why_are_incubators_impo
rtant_for_social_innovation
Nascimento, L. D. S., Fernandes, B., & Salazar, V. (2020). Social incubation: Strategic benefits for social enterprise. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 18, 163-177.
Nicholls, A., Simon, J., Gabriel, M. (2015). Introduction: Dimensions of Social Innovation. In: Nicholls, A., Simon, J., Gabriel, M. (Eds), New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research (pp. 1-26). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801_1
Nicolopoulou, K., Karatas-Özkan, M., Vas, C., & Nouman, M. (2017). An incubation perspective on social innovation: The London Hub as a social incubator. R&D Management, 47(3), 368-384. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12179
Nino, A. C. S. (2015). Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences and Points in Common. Journal of Business & Economic Policy, 2(2), 85-93.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Policy Brief on Social Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Activities in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Social%20entrepreneurship%20policy%20brief% 20EN_FINAL.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Social entrepreneurship & Social enterprises. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/social-economy/social-entrepreneurship.htm
Păunescu, C., Drăgan, D., Cantaragiu, R., & Filculescu, A. (2013). Towards a Conceptualization of Social Entrepreneurship in Higher Education, The International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology, 10, 51-69.
Ramos-Monge, E. L., Llinás-Audet, X., & Barrena-Martinez, J. (2017). Universities as Corporate Entities: The Role of Social Responsibility in Their Strategic Management. In: Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali (Eds.), Corporate Governance and Strategic Decision Making. London: IntechOpen.
DOI:10.5772/intechopen.69931.
Robinson, J. (2006). Navigating social and institutional barriers to markets: How
social entrepreneurs identify and evaluate opportunities. In: J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 95-120). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sahu, D. (2018). Social enterprise incubator- An emerging model of social innovation system development in India. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/10223930/Social_Enterprise_Incubator_An_Emergin g_Model_of_Social_Innovation_System_Development_in_India
Santos, F. M., (2012). A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335-351.
Sepulveda, L. (2015). Social enterprise: A new phenomenon in the field of economic and social welfare. Social Policy and Administration, 49(7), 842-861.
Sour, P. (2020). Social Innovation in the USA: A Landscape Analysis of Social Enterprises Incubators. Retrieved from: https://www.engineeringforchange.org/research/social-innovation-usa-landscape- analysis-social-enterprise-incubators/
United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs. (2023). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
Vasilescu, R., Barna, C., Epure, M., & Baicu, C. (2010). Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4177-4187.
Wagid, Z., & Oliver, H. (2017). Cultivating Social Entrepreneurial Capacities in Students through Film: Implications for Social Entrepreneurship Education.
Educational Research for Social Change, 5(2), 76-100.
Yunus, M. (2008). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of
capitalism. Global Urban Development, 4(2), 1-19. Retrieved from https://www.globalurban.org/GUDMag08Vol4Iss2/Yunus.pdf		zh_TW