Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能、 教師組織承諾、工作滿意度相關研究之後設分析
Meta-analysis of Studies on the Relationship among Elementary School Principals` Transformational Leadership and School Effectiveness, Teachers` Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction作者 周碧惠
Chou, Pi-Hui貢獻者 郭昭佑
Guo, Chao-Yu
周碧惠
Chou, Pi-Hui關鍵詞 工作滿意度
文獻計量分析
後設分析
組織承諾
轉型領導
job satisfaction
bibliometric analysis
meta-analysis
organizational commitment
transformational leadership日期 2023 上傳時間 1-Sep-2023 16:16:56 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究以國內有關「國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、工作滿意度相關研究」之博碩士論文及期刊為主要研究對象；研究目的主要探究校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之間的相關性，以其相同或相似者文獻為研究樣本，採後設分析法，探求彼此關聯強度及方向。研究發現：一、校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之研究樣本現況總體文獻呈現以博碩士論文為主，共40篇報告，陳述42個相關性；發表時間由2001年至2020年；研究樣本以女性受試者偏多。二、校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之關聯強度(一)校長轉型領導與學校效能具高度正相關。(二)校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾具高度正相關。(三)校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度具高度正相關，且高於與學校效能、教師組織承諾關係。三、校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之調節結果(一)「研究年代」是校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之間的調節變項。(二)「研究地區」是校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師工作滿意度之間的調節變項，並非與教師組織承諾之間的調節變項。(三)受試者「性別」（男性占比）是校長轉型領導與學校效能之間的調節變項，並非與教師組織承諾和教師工作滿意度之間的調節變項。最後，建議校長宜善加運用並實踐轉型領導策略，培養並發展對各種情境的洞察力、敏銳回應、共構願景能力，從而改變並有效提升轉型領導策略作為的更高成效。
This study takes the domestic doctoral dissertation, master’s thesis and journals on "Principals’ Transformation Leadership and School Effectiveness, Teachers’ Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction" as the main research objects. The purpose of the research is to explore the correlation between principal’s transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfaction. Using the same or similar literature as the research sample, and meta-analysis method is used to explore the strength and direction of thier correlation. The study found that:1.Overview of research samples on principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfactionThe research samples were mainly doctoral dissertations and master’s theses. A total of 40 reports, stating 42 correlations, were published from 2001 to 2020. These research samples were mostly female subjects.2.The correlation strength between principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfaction(1)Principals’ transformational leadership is highly positively correlated with school effectiveness.(2)Principals’ transformational leadership is highly positively correlated with teachers’ organizational commitment.(3)Principals’ transformational leadership is highly positively correlated with teachers’ job satisfaction, and higher than that with school effectiveness and teachers’ organizational commitment.3.Results of moderating analysis of principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfaction(1)"Research age" is a moderating variable between principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfaction.(2)"Research area" is a moderating variable between principals’ transformational leadership, school effectiveness, and teachers’ job satisfaction, but not a moderating variable between teachers’ organizational commitment.(3)The subject "gender" (proportion of males) is a moderating variable between principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, but not a moderating variable between teachers’ organization commitment and teachers’ job satisfaction.Finally, it is recommended that principals should make good use of and practice transformational leadership strategies. Cultivate and develop the ability to perceive various situations, respond sensitively, and jointly construct visions, so as to change and effectively enhance the higher effectiveness of transformational leadership strategis.參考文獻 壹.中文部分Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2016).。後設分析：Introduction to Meta-Analysis（吳政達審訂；初版）。臺北市：高等教育。（原著出版於2009年）Rosenthal, R. (1999) 。社會研究的後設分析程序（齊力譯；初版）。臺北市：弘智文化。（原著出版於1991年）丁一顧（2013）。校長轉型領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。屏東教育大學學報-教育類，41，71-100。王明傑（2012）。提升學校效能的領導。師友月刊，538，20-24。https://doi.org/10.6437/EM.201204.0020＊王秀燕（2004）。臺北縣市國民小學女性校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立師範學院。王姵方（2020）。臺灣中小學教師心理資本與幸福感關係之後設分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學。＊王俊杰（2010）。國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究--以臺北縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學。王博弘、林清達（2006）。台灣近二十年來校長領導實徵研究與學校效能關係之探討。花蓮教育大學學報（教育類），22，283-306。https://doi.org/10.7073/JNHUEA.200605.0283方瑀紳、李隆盛（2016）。資訊教育系所學位論文研究趨勢與課題：2004～2013學年的文獻計量分析。教育研究集刊，62（1），35-69。白崇亮（1986）。組織承諾研究：理論與實證。管理評論，5(2)，30-51。http://dx.doi.org/10.6656/MR.1986.5.2.CHI.30牟鍾福(2002)。國中體育教師組織正義與組織信任對組織承諾影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。全國法規資料庫（2016年6月1日）。國民教育法第九條。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070001＊李玉美（2020）。嘉義縣偏遠地區國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學。李茂能（2015）。傳統整合分析理論與實務:ESS & EXCEL。五南。李杰、陳超美（2017）。CiteSpace ：科技文本挖掘及可視化（第二版）。首都經濟貿易大學出版社。李杰（2022）。科學知識圖譜原理及應用：VOSviewer和CitNetExplorer初學者指南。高等教育。＊李貞儀（2005）。國民小學校長轉型領導互易領導與兼任行政職務教師工作滿意之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學。李家安、郭昭佑（2014）。教師工作滿意度的新觀點—從第三域的視角出發。臺灣教育評論月刊，3（2），101-105。＊李源景（2014）。國民小學校長轉型領導、教師工作壓力與學校效能之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。＊呂旺澤（2008）。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之研究—以組織承諾為中介變項（未出版之碩士論文）。亞洲大學。林生傳（2022）。教育大辭書：學校效能（Effectiveness of School）。國家教育研究院，樂詞網。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/eeeecbf4d9c8e93bfffb5cde829df19d/林金福（2003）。高中職校長轉型領導、知識管理與學校效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。＊林志興（2007）。台中縣國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學。林明地、連俊智（2013）。國小學校領導動力及其學校效能的差異分析。教育研究集刊，59（4），1-45。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082013125904001＊林俊雄（2009）。桃園縣國小校長轉型領導與體育教師組織承諾相關之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣體育大學（桃園）。林俊傑（2007）。組織承諾的理論與相關研究之探討。學校行政，51，35-53。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200709.0035＊邱成穩（2005）。新竹縣國民小學校長轉型領導與健康與體育學習領域教學效能相關之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學。＊邱素真（2008）。高雄市國民小學校長轉型領導、組織創新氣氛與教師組織承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中山大學。柯雅欽（2006）。國民小學校長轉型領導、組織創新與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。范織文（2002）。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。＊范熾文（2005）。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。臺中教育大學學報，19（2），1-22。范熾文（2007）。教師組織承諾：概念、發展、類別及其啟示。學校行政，50，128-144。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200707.0128周昌柏（2006）。國民小學教師組織承諾之研究。學校行政，46，52-71。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200611.0052＊周昌柏、范熾文（2006）。國小校長轉型領導、交易領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。花蓮教育大學學報，22，255-281。https://doi.org/10.7073/JNHUEA.200605.0255＊周裕隆（2008）。新竹縣市國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。玄奘大學。吳百祿（2004）。學校領導：願景、領導與管理。高雄復文。吳明清（2006）。學校領導的整合架構。台灣教育，642，2-5。http://dx.doi.org/10.6395/TER.200612.0002＊吳明雄（2001）。國民小學校長轉型領導行為與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中師範學院。＊吳明雄（2010）。國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導、教師知識管理與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺中教育大學。吳明鋗（2013）。大學教師工作投入、工作壓力、工作滿意與組織承諾之相關研究─以ESI核心競爭學門為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。＊吳佩樺（2008）。國民小學男女校長轉化領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。吳政達、陳芝仙（2006）。國內有關國中小校長教學領導研究之後設分析。教育學刊，26，47-83。吳勁甫（2018）。校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之後設分析。教育科學期刊，17（2），1-31。吳清山（1988a）。追求卓越的教育—學校效能模式初探。師友月刊，255，24-25。http://dx.doi.org/10.6437/EM.198809.0024吳清山（1988b）。好老師、好校長與好學校。師友月刊，258，21-22。http://dx.doi.org/10.6437/EM.198812.0021吳清山（2005）。書評：學校效能研究的價值（評R. J. Marzano之What Works in Schools: Translating Research into Action）。教育研究集刊，51（2），133-139。吳清山（2012，6月）。校長領導與學生學習。國家教育研究院電子報，42。https://reurl.cc/GAk29A吳清山、徐藝華（2015）。校長是風氣的標竿。師友月刊，573，55-58。http://dx.doi.org/10.6437/EM.201503_ (573).0013吳煥烘（2004）。學校行政領導理論與實務。五南。洪文義、盧建余、陳威有、戴經洲（2022）。工作特性與工作滿意度之研究。全球科技管理與教育期刊，11（2）15-28。https://doi.org/10.6617/GTME.202206_11 (2).0002姜定宇、鄭伯壎（2003）。組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行爲研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究，19，175-209。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=15609251-200309-x-19-175-209-a＊胡茜欣（2014）。臺北市公立國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學。洪敏哲（2016）。警察人員情緒勞動、心理資本、工作滿意與工作績效關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。＊涂欽文（2008）。國小教師知覺校長互易領導、轉型領導與組織承諾之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中原大學。秦夢群、吳勁甫（2009）。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與組織效能關係之研究：中介效果模式之檢證。當代教育研究季刊，17(3)，83-124。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2009.1703.03秦夢群（2013）。教育領導理論與應用。五南。秦夢群、吳勁甫（2013）。校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾之關係研究：多層次取向之後設分析。國立高雄師範大學教育學刊，41，1-48。秦夢群（2015）。教育行政理論與模式。五南。教育部（2023）。教育部部史。https://history.moe.gov.tw/Memorabilia?yearInterval=2002%EF%BC%8D2011＊梁丁財（2001）。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中師範學院。國家發展委員會（2022）。110年「都市及區域發展統計彙編」。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_77_4402陳巧芬、蔡文榮（2011）。臺灣近年來有關校長轉型領導與學校效能博碩士論文實徵研究之分析。教育科學期刊，10(1)，125-150。https://doi.org/10.6388/JES.201106.0125＊陳正華（2010）。宜蘭縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學。＊陳春蓮（2006）。國小校長轉型領導、組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。陳美秀（2022）。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師行為促進學生創造力關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。＊陳俊雄（2010）。高雄市國小校長轉型領導、組織氣候與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。陳俊瑋（2009）。台灣地區教師自我效能感研究之統合分析。彰化師大教育學報，15，41-64。陳悅、陳超美、胡志剛、王賢文（2014）。引文空間分析原理與應用：CiteSpace實用指南。科學出版社。陳景花（2018）。正向心理學介入對幸福與憂鬱效果之視覺化文獻回顧與後設分析（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學。陳景花（2019）。正向心裡學介入對幸福與憂鬱效果之後設分析。教育心理學報，50（4），551-586。陳景花（2022）。COVID-19心理研究之文獻計量分析。教育與心理研究，45（4），1-43。陳惠芳（2008）。在組織變革環境下賦權對組織承諾之影響研究－檢視內外控傾向與知覺心理契約違反之干擾效果。臺大管理論叢，18（2），1-26。http://dx.doi.org/10.6226/NTURM2008.18.2.1＊陳順良（2007）。高雄縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。＊陳舒婷（2014）。國小校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究—以桃園縣偏遠地區為例（未出版之碩士論文）。中原大學。＊陳德慶（2007）。桃竹苗地區公立國民小學校長之「轉型領導」、「家長式領導」與其「學校效能」關係之研究－以「教師組織承諾」為中介變項（未出版之碩士論文）。玄奘大學。＊陳維寧（2011）。國民小學校長轉型領導、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之研究~以原高雄市為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。＊陳學賢（2006）。高雄市國小校長轉型領導、學校願景發展與教師組織承諾關係之研究。臺東大學教育學報，17(1)，77-106。http://dx.doi.org/10.6778/NTTUERJ.200606.0077＊陳麗卿（2014）。高雄市國民小學校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。＊許淑媛（2010）。內部行銷、校長轉型領導、組織承諾與組織開放氣氛對學校效能之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。南華大學。黃宗顯（2008）。學校領導：心理論與實踐。五南。＊黃秋燕（2009）。國民小學女性校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。逢甲大學。＊黃淑慧（2013）。高雄市國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。＊黃種斌（2005）。桃園縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹師範學院。黃薏璇、吳政達(2017)。學校領導研究熱點與前沿的文獻計量分析(2000-2017)。教育研究月刊，282，114-131。＊黃寶塘（2011）。臺南縣市國小校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台南大學。程煒庭（2021）。校長轉型領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能之關係研究─後設分析與結構方程模式之應用(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。張攸萍（2019）。幼兒園園長領導相關研究之後設分析—整合文獻計量方法之應用(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。＊張宏毅（2002）。台北縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北師範學院。＊張明忠（2006）。國小校長轉型領導、健體領域教師組織承諾與工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣體育學院。張紹勳（2021）。Meta分析實作:使用Excel與CMA程式。五南。張新堂（2005）。高級中學知識管理、教師專業成長需求、與組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。張慶勳（1997）。學校組織轉化領導研究。高雄復文。＊張賢坤（2004）。桃園縣國民小學校長轉型領導與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北師範學院。葉佳文（2007）。臺灣地區公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。詹志禹(1988)。後設分析：量化的文獻探討法。思與言雜誌社，26(4)，311-325。＊趙偉勝（2007）。國小校長轉型領導、教師工作滿意與工作投入關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中華大學。蔡宗興、曾瑞譙（2008）。雲嘉南地區國民中學教育人員知覺校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政，57，110-146。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200809.0110蔡炳坤（2007）。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。蔡進雄（2000）。轉型領導與學校效能。師大書苑。蔡進雄（2005）。學校領導理論研究。師大書苑。蔡進雄（2005）。超越轉型領導：國民中小學校長新轉型領導影響教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊，13，37-63。蔡進雄（2018）。從學校效能到學校改進之探析：兼論無靈魂的評鑑。教育行政論壇，10（2），1-14。＊蘇美珠（2007）。高雄縣國民小學校長轉型領導行為與教師組織承諾、工作投入關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中山大學。劉秀曦（2020）。數據活起來，教育有未來。國家教育研究院電子報。https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=3&edm_no=194&content_no=3450劉雅菁（1998）。國民小學校長運用轉型領導之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。＊劉創任（2008）。台北縣國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導行為與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學。盧心雨（2011）。體育行政人員工作滿意、工作壓力、組織承諾與工作績效之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。＊盧美文（2006）。國小校長轉型領導、組織學習與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立花蓮教育大學。謝欣頤（2021）。教師對資訊與通信科技的態度研究之後設分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學。貳.英文部分Admiraal, W., Veldman, I., Mainhard, T., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2019). A typology of veteran teachers’ job satisfaction: Their relationships with their students and the nature of their work. Social Psychology of Education, 22(2), 337-355.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-09477-zAllen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.xAlsaeedi, F., & Male, T. (2013). Transformational leadership and globalization: Attitudes of school principals in Kuwait. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 640-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213488588Alzoraiki, M., Ahmad, A. R., Ateeq, A. A., Naji, G. M. A., Almaamari, Q., & Beshr, B. A. H. (2023). Impact of teachers’ commitment to the relationship between transformational leadership and sustainable teaching performance. Sustainability, 15(5), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620Aydin, A., Sarier, Y., & Uysal, S. (2013). The effect of school principals` leadership styles on teachers` organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 13(2), 806-811.Balyer, A., & Oezcan, K. (2012). Cultural adaptation of headmasters` transformational leadership scale and a study on teachers` perceptions. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 12, 103-128.Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Bass, B. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181-217.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843 (99)00016-8Baeza, M. A., Gonzalez, J. A., & Wang, Y. (2018). Job flexibility and job satisfaction among Mexican professionals: A socio-cultural explanation. Employee Relations, 40(5), 921-942. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-12-2016-0236Bellibas, M. S., Kılınc, A. C., & Polatcan, M. (2021). The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: An integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 776-814.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211035079Bellibas, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Akyürek, M. İ. (2022). Principal leadership typologies and their relationship with teacher self-efficacy and commitment: A latent profile mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-20. Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221139932Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2017). The mediating role of principals’ transformational leadership behaviors in promoting teachers’ emotional wellness at work: A study in Israeli primary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 316-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215617947Berkovich, I. (2018a). When the going gets tough: Schools in challenging circumstances and the effectiveness of principals` leadership styles. Journal of Community Applied Social Psychology, 28, 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2372Berkovich, I. (2018b). Will it sink or will it float: Putting three common conceptions about principals’ transformational leadership to the test. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 888-907.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217714253Berkovich, I., & Bogler, R. (2021). Conceptualising the mediating paths linking effective school leadership to teachers’ organisational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 410-429.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220907321Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662-683.https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610121969460Bogler, R. (2002). Two profiles of schoolteachers: A discriminant analysis of job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(6), 665-673.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X (02)00026-4Borgmann, L., Rowold, J., & Bormann, K. C. (2016). Integrating leadership research: A meta-analytical test of Yukl`s meta-categories of leadership. Personnel Review, 45(6), 1340-1366.Bottery, M. (2006). Education and globalization: Redefining the role of the educational professional. Educational Review, 58(1), 95-113.https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500352804Breevaart, K., & Zacher, H. (2019). Main and interactive effects of weekly transformational and laissez-faire leadership on followers’ trust in the leader and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(2)，384-409.https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12253Brüggemann, P., & Rajguru, K. (2022). Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) 3.0: A software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10(4), 425-429.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-022-00184-5Burić, I., Kovačić, M. P., & Huić, A. (2021). Transformational leadership and instructional quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: A moderated mediation analysis. Društvena Istraživanja, 30(2), 181-202. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.30.2.01Burkhauser, S. (2017). How much do school principals’ matter when it comes to teacher working conditions? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 126-145. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716668028Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper and Row.Cansoy, R., & Polatcan, M. (2019). The relationship between school principals` leadership and teachers` organisational commitment: A systematic review. Bartin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 1-31.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.441189Çayak, S. (2021). The effect of sustainable leadership behaviors of school principals on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 12(1), 102-120.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2021-0008Chen, L.-H. (2008).Job satisfaction among information system (IS) personnel. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.012Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Principal`s leadership as a critical factor for school performance: Evidence from multi‐levels of primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345940050306Chin, J. M.-C. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education. Review. 8(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029253Cleavenger, D. J., & Munyon, T. P. (2013). It`s how you frame it: Transformational leadership and the meaning of work. Business Horizons, 56(3), 351-360.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.002Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed). Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D. & Perry, N. E. (2011). Predicting teacher commitment: The impact of school climate and social–emotional learning. Psychology in the Schools, 48(10), 1034-1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20611Day, C. (2000). Beyond transformational leadership.Educational Leadership, 57(7), 56-59. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ609645Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gorgen, K. (2020). Successful school leadership. In education development trust. Education Development Trust.Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (1998). A three domain model of teacher and school executive career satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 362-378.https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239810211545Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2016). The effects of autonomy gap in personnel policy, principal leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy on their organizational commitment. Asia Pacific Education. Review. 17, 339-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9428-7Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2017). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 959-977.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216653975Draghici, A., Dursun, S., Bașol O., Boatca, M. E., & Gaureanu A.（2022）. The mediating role of safety climate in the relationship between transformational safety leadership and safe behavior—The case of two companies in Turkey and Romania. Sustainability, 14(14), 8464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148464Dumay, X., & Galand, B. (2012). The multilevel impact of transformational leadership on teacher commitment: Cognitive and motivational pathways. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 703-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.577889Dutta, V., & Sahney, S. (2016). School leadership and its impact on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 941-958.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2014-0170Edinger, S. K., & Edinger, M. J. (2018). Improving teacher job satisfaction: The roles of social capital, teacher efficacy, and support. The Journal of Psychology, 152(8), 573-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1489364Effendi, Y. R., & Sahertian, P. (2022). Principals` transformational leadership in strengthening character education at senior high school level (SMA) in Indonesia. South African Journal of Education, 42(2), 1-11.https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42n2a2034Ellen D., Annie H., & Filip D. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational Research Review, 27, 110-125.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003Ferguson, M. (2013). When the (education) revolution comes. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(2), 68-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500215Fischer, S. A, Jones, J., & Verran, J. A. (2018). Consensus achievement of leadership, organisational and individual factors that influence safety climate: Implications for nursing management. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(1), 50-58.https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12519Freeman, G. T., & Fields, D. (2020). School leadership in an urban context: complicating notions of effective principal leadership, organizational setting, and teacher commitment to students. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 26(2), 318-338.https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1818133Ghosh R. (2012). School effectiveness: Pursuing excellence and inclusion. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Development, 1(2), 1-6.https://doi.org/10.6228/APJED.01.02.01Gilbert, R. B., Adesope, O. O., & Schroeder, N. L. (2014) .Efficacy beliefs, job satisfaction, stress and their influence on the occupational commitment of english-medium content teachers in the Dominican Republic. Educational Psychology, 34(7), 876-899. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.814193Goktas, E. (2021). Effectiveness correlates of school leadership styles and teachers` job satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(4), 1023-1044. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2021.04.006Gomes, G., Seman, L. O., & Carmona, L. J. D. M. (2021). Service innovation through transformational leadership, work-life balance, and organisational learning capability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(4), 365-378.https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1814953Gong, M. Z., & Subramaniam, N. (2020). Principal leadership style and school performance: Mediating roles of risk management culture and management control systems use in Australian schools. Accounting & Finance, 60(3), 2427-2466.https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12416Grissom, J. A., & Bartanen, B. (2019). Strategic retention: Principal effectiveness and teacher turnover in multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 514-555.https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218797931Grissom, J. A., Egalite. A. J., & Lindsay. C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesisHallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2003). Understanding the principal’s contribution to school improvement. In M. Wallace and L. Poulson (Eds.), Learning to read critically in educational leadership and management (pp. 215-235). Sage.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216576Herrera, R. (2010). Principal leadership and school effectiveness: Perspectives from principals and teachers (Order No. 3410406) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Western Michigan University, Available from Education Database; ProQuest Central. (503232723).Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. (2005). What We Know About Leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.169Hsiao, H.-C., & Chang, J.-C. (2011). The role of organizational learning in transformational leadership and organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 621-631.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9165-xHsu, N., Newman, D. A., & Badura, K. L. (2022). Emotional intelligence and transformational leadership: Meta-analysis and explanatory model of female leadership advantage. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 104.https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040104Huang, T. H., TING, S. C., & Chen, B. C. (2021). The impacts of principal`s transformational leadership and environmental obstacles on teachers` job satisfaction: The mediation of professional learning community. Education Journal, 49(2), 191-215.Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers` and teacher leaders` job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450902909840Hussein, B., & Yesiltas, M. (2020). The influence of emotional intelligence on employee’s counterwork behavior and organizational commitment: Mediating role of transformational leadership. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 71, 377-402.Jacobsen, C. B., & Staniok C. D. (2020). Sharing the fire? The moderating role of transformational leadership congruence on the relationship between managers’ and employees’ organizational commitment. International Public Management Journal, 23(4), 564-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1486930Jacobsen, C. B., Andersen, L. B., Bøllingtoft, A., & Eriksen, T. L.M. (2022). Can leadership training improve organizational effectiveness? Evidence from a randomized field experiment on transformational and transactional leadership. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13356Jantzi, D., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Toward an explanation of variation in teachers’ perceptions of transformational school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 512-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X9603200404Jung, J.-Y., & Woo, J.-G. (2022). Structural model analysis of factors affecting sustainable teacher job satisfaction in Korea: Evidence from TALIS 2018. Sustainability, 14(13), 8014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138014Kalkan, U., Aksal, F. A., Gazi, Z. A., Atasoy, R., & Dağlı, G. (2020). The relationship between school administrators` leadership styles, School culture, and organizational Image. Sage Open, 10(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902081Karadag, E. (2020). The effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement: A cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2008 and 2018. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09612-1Kaya, M., & Demir, M. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between school leadership and collective teacher efficacy: A cultural comparison. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2022.2128431Khasawneh, S., Omari, A., & Abu-Tineh, A. M. (2012). The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment: The case for vocational teachers in Jordan. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(4), 494-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212438217Kılınç, A. Ç., Polatcan, M., Savaş, G., & Er, E. (2022). How transformational leadership influences teachers’ commitment and innovative practices: Understanding the moderating role of trust in principal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221082803Kim, H. D., & Cruz, A. B. (2022).Gender differences in the relationships between coach transformational leadership and player satisfaction and commitment: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13,915391.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915391Kirby, P. C., Paradise, L. V., & King, M. I. (1992). Extraordinary leaders in education: Understanding transformational leadership. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(5), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941130Klassen, R. M., & Anderson, C. J. K. (2009). How times change: Secondary teachers` job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in 1962 and 2007. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 745-759. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802688721Klassen, R. M. (2010). Teacher stress: The mediating role of collective efficacy beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(5), 342-350.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383069Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160404Lambert, E. G., Qureshi, H., Frank, J., Klahm, C., & Smith, B. (2018). Job stress, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment and their associations with job burnout among Indian police officers: A research note. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 33(2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-017-9236-yLambert, E. G., Pasupuleti, S., Cluse-Tolar, T., Srinivasa, S. R., & Jiang, S. (2021). Research note: The effects of organizational trust on the work attitudes of U.S. social workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 48(1), 120-133.https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2021.1976350Lee, Y. P., Wang, Y. H., Chen, I. H., & Yeh, Y. T. (2019). Calling and organizational commitment: A moderated mediation model of career commitment and person-organization fit. Journal of Management and Business Research, 36(4), 369-389. https://doi.org/10.6504/JMBR.201912_36 (4).0002Leithwood, K., & Poplin, M. S. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8-12.Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451-479. https://doi.org/ 10.1076/sesi.10.4.451.3495Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Review of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/pages/how-leadership-influences-student-learning.aspxLeithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000).The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-129.https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127).Litz, D., & Scott, S. (2017). Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 566-587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216636112Liu, X. S., & Ramsey, J. (2008). Teachers’ job satisfaction: Analyses of the teacher follow-up survey in the United States for 2000–2001. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1173-1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.010Lopes, J., & Oliveira, C. (2020). Teacher and school determinants of teacher job satisfaction: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(4), 641-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1764593Ma, X., & MacMillan, R. B. (1999). Influences of workplace conditions on teachers` job satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 39-47.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597627Malinen, O. P., & Savolainen, H. (2016). The effect of perceived school climate and teacher efficacy in behavior management on job satisfaction and burnout: A longitudinal study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 144-152.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.012Malloch, K. (2014). Beyond transformational leadership to greater engagement: Inspiring innovation in complex organizations. Nurse Leader, 12(2), 60-63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2014.01.004Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253412Mathieu, C., Fabi, B., Lacoursière, R., & Raymond, L. (2016). The role of supervisory behavior, job satisfaction and organizational commitment on employee turnover. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(1), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.25McCarley, T. A., Peters, M. L., & Decman, J. M. (2016). Transformational leadership related to school climate: A multi-level analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(2), 322-342.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549966Menon, M. E. (2023). Transformational school leadership and the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceptions of teachers in Cyprus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231166515Messmann, G., Evers, A., & Kreijns, K. (2022). The role of basic psychological needs satisfaction in the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 33(1), 29-45.https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21451Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842Michael R., & Dominik P. (2021) School principals’ educational goals and leadership styles for digital transformation: Results from case studies in upper secondary schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-19. Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13603124.2021.2014979Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010).Preferred reporting Items for systematic and meta-analysis (PRISMA) group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341.Nasra, M. A., & Heilbrunn, S. (2016). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior in the Arab educational system in Israel: The impact of trust and job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(3), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549975Nguni, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers` job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145-177.https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565746Odhiambo, G., & Hii, A. (2012). Key stakeholders’ perceptions of effective school leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(2), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211432412OECD (2013).Glossary of statistical terms: Bibliometrics. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=198OECD (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners, TALIS. OECD.https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en.OECD (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals, TALIS. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-enOkubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 1997/01). https://doi.org/10.1787/208277770603Pan, H.-L. W., & Chen, W.-Y. (2021). How principal leadership facilitates teacher learning through teacher leadership: Determining the critical path. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 454-470.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220913553Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2020). What motivates people to teach, and why do they leave? Accountability, performativity and teacher retention. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417Qureshi, H., Lambert, E. G., Holbrook, M. A., Frank, J., Hines, C., & Thakur, M. (2023). Testing the job demands-resources model for Indian correctional staff job satisfaction. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 72,100564.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100564Rodríguez, D., Van Landeghem, H., Lasio, V., & Buyens, D. (2017), Determinants of job satisfaction in a lean environment. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(2), 134-152.Rodriguez, L. A., Swain, W. A., & Springer, M. G. (2020). Sorting through performance evaluations: The influence of performance evaluation reform on teacher attrition and mobility. American Educational Research Journal, 57(6), 2339-2377.https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220910989Rosenthal, R. (1979).The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research (Rev. ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984997Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006) .Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 179-199.https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565795Ryan, R. (2016).Cochrane Consumers and Communicatin Group: Meta-analysis. Cochrane Consumers and communication.https://cccrg.cochrane.org/sites/cccrg.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/meta-analysis_revised_december_1st_1_2016.pdfSchwarz, UV, Hasson, H., & Tafvelin, S. (2016). Leadership training as an occupational health intervention: Improved safety and sustained productivity. Safety Science, 81, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.020Seidel, T. (2008). Keyword: Criteria of school effectiveness in international empirical research. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 11(3), 348-367.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-008-0032-4Seltzer, J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16(4), 693-703.https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600403Sesen, H., & Basim, N. H. (2012). Impact of satisfaction and commitment on teachers’ organizational citizenship. Educational Psychology, 32(4), 475-491.https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2012.670900Shila, J. M., & Sevilla, A. V. (2015). The impact of the principals` leadership style on teachers` job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 37-43.Silins, H. C. (1994). Leadership characteristics and school improvement. Australian Journal of Education, 38(3), 266-281.https://doi.org/10.1177/000494419403800306Slater, R. O., & Teddlie, C. (1992). Toward a theory of school effectiveness and leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(4), 247-257.https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345920030402Steers, R.M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organisational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391745Strawser, M. G., Smith, S., & Rubenking, B. (2022). A focus on faculty: Mentorship, organizational identification, and job satisfaction. The Journal of Faculty Development, 36(1), 38-47.Tan, C. Y., Gao, L., & Shi, M. (2020). Second-order meta-analysis synthesizing the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 469-490.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220935456Tesfaw, T. A. (2014). The relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction: The case of government secondary school teachers in Ethiopia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(6), 903-918.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214551948The Wallace Foundation. (2013). The school principal as leader: Guiding schools to better teaching and learning. https://reurl.cc/QW381qThomas, L., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., Kelchtermans, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2020). Transformational school leadership as a key factor for teachers’ job attitudes during their first year in the profession. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 106-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218781064Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496-536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11400185Tickle, B. R., Chang, M., & Kim, S. (2011). Administrative support and its mediating effect on US public school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 342-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.002Tingle, E., Corrales, A., & Peters, M. L. (2019). Leadership development programs: Investing in school principals. Educational Studies, 45, 1-16. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03055698.2017.1382332Top, M., Tarcan, M., Tekingündüz, S., & Hikmet, N. (2013). An analysis of relationships among transformational leadership, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational trust in two Turkish hospitals. The International Journal of Health Planning and Managemen, 28(3), 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2154Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 71-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2014). What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 96-134.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13489019Vanmol, S., De Vos. S., Beausaert, S., & De Wilde, J. (2022). How does newly qualified teachers` collegial network foster their feedback-seeking behaviour and job satisfaction? Teachers and Teaching, 28(6), 703-723.https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13540602.2022.2098267Veličković, V.M., Višnjić, A., Jović, S., Radulović, O., Šargić, C., Mihajlović, J., & Mladenović, J. (2014).Organizational commitment and job satisfaction among nurses in Serbia: A factor analysis. Nursing Outlook, 62(6), 415-427.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2014.05.003Whang C. (2021, February 9). The role of school heads and why they matter during the COVID pandemic. OECD Education and Skills Today.https://oecdedutoday.com/role-school-principals-heads-covid/Whitehead, B., Boschee, F., & Decker, R. (2013). Nature of leadership: challenge of the times. In B. Whitehead, F. Boschee, & R. Decker (Eds), The Principal: Leadership for a Global Society (pp. 3-25). SAGE Publications, Inc.https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781544308609Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2000). Wilderness challenge programs for delinquent youth: A meta-analysis of outcome evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189 (99)00040-3Yohannes, M. E., & Wasonga, T. A. (2021). Leadership styles and teacher job satisfaction in Ethiopian schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211041625Yokota, H. (2020). Mapping four leadership styles in Japan: How has the role of the principal been shaped by policies? Journal of Educational Administration, 58(2), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2019-0032Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843 (99)00013-2Zeinabadi, H. (2023). Breaking down the walls of weak knowledge-sharing among Iranian teachers: Investigating a less-considered leadership role of principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(1), 176-197.Zhu, M., Guo, C.Y., Hou, Y.C., & Chiu, M.S. (2021) Graduate employment in higher education: Applying bibliometrics to world-system theory. Journal of Education and Work, 34(3), 356-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.1922621 描述 博士
國立政治大學
教育學系
108152506資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108152506 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 郭昭佑 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Guo, Chao-Yu en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 周碧惠 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chou, Pi-Hui en_US dc.creator (作者) 周碧惠 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chou, Pi-Hui en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Sep-2023 16:16:56 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Sep-2023 16:16:56 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Sep-2023 16:16:56 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0108152506 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147251 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 教育學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 108152506 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以國內有關「國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、工作滿意度相關研究」之博碩士論文及期刊為主要研究對象；研究目的主要探究校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之間的相關性，以其相同或相似者文獻為研究樣本，採後設分析法，探求彼此關聯強度及方向。研究發現：一、校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之研究樣本現況總體文獻呈現以博碩士論文為主，共40篇報告，陳述42個相關性；發表時間由2001年至2020年；研究樣本以女性受試者偏多。二、校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之關聯強度(一)校長轉型領導與學校效能具高度正相關。(二)校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾具高度正相關。(三)校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度具高度正相關，且高於與學校效能、教師組織承諾關係。三、校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之調節結果(一)「研究年代」是校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師組織承諾、教師工作滿意度之間的調節變項。(二)「研究地區」是校長轉型領導與學校效能、教師工作滿意度之間的調節變項，並非與教師組織承諾之間的調節變項。(三)受試者「性別」（男性占比）是校長轉型領導與學校效能之間的調節變項，並非與教師組織承諾和教師工作滿意度之間的調節變項。最後，建議校長宜善加運用並實踐轉型領導策略，培養並發展對各種情境的洞察力、敏銳回應、共構願景能力，從而改變並有效提升轉型領導策略作為的更高成效。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study takes the domestic doctoral dissertation, master’s thesis and journals on "Principals’ Transformation Leadership and School Effectiveness, Teachers’ Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction" as the main research objects. The purpose of the research is to explore the correlation between principal’s transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfaction. Using the same or similar literature as the research sample, and meta-analysis method is used to explore the strength and direction of thier correlation. The study found that:1.Overview of research samples on principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfactionThe research samples were mainly doctoral dissertations and master’s theses. A total of 40 reports, stating 42 correlations, were published from 2001 to 2020. These research samples were mostly female subjects.2.The correlation strength between principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfaction(1)Principals’ transformational leadership is highly positively correlated with school effectiveness.(2)Principals’ transformational leadership is highly positively correlated with teachers’ organizational commitment.(3)Principals’ transformational leadership is highly positively correlated with teachers’ job satisfaction, and higher than that with school effectiveness and teachers’ organizational commitment.3.Results of moderating analysis of principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfaction(1)"Research age" is a moderating variable between principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, teachers’ organizational commitment, and teachers’ job satisfaction.(2)"Research area" is a moderating variable between principals’ transformational leadership, school effectiveness, and teachers’ job satisfaction, but not a moderating variable between teachers’ organizational commitment.(3)The subject "gender" (proportion of males) is a moderating variable between principals’ transformational leadership and school effectiveness, but not a moderating variable between teachers’ organization commitment and teachers’ job satisfaction.Finally, it is recommended that principals should make good use of and practice transformational leadership strategies. Cultivate and develop the ability to perceive various situations, respond sensitively, and jointly construct visions, so as to change and effectively enhance the higher effectiveness of transformational leadership strategis. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的與待答問題 8第三節 名詞釋義 10第四節 研究方法與步驟 12第五節 研究範圍與限制 14第二章 文獻探討 17第一節 國民小學校長轉型領導基本概念 17第二節 國民小學校長轉型領導相關研究變項之評析 34第三節 國民小學校長轉型領導之國際研究趨勢 59第四節 國民小學校長轉型領導之國內研究趨勢 68第三章 研究設計與實施 79第一節 研究架構與變項 79第二節 研究對象 83第三節 研究工具 86第四節 研究方法與實施流程 88第五節 資料處理 94第四章 研究結果與分析 107第一節 研究樣本現況分析 107第二節 校長轉型領導與學校效能之相關性分析 123第三節 校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾之相關性分析 133第四節 校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度之相關性分析 141第五節 綜合討論 153第五章 結論與建議 161第一節 結論 161第二節 建議 168參考文獻 177中文部分 177英文部分 186附錄 207研究樣本編碼摘錄表（附錄之一至之三） 207 zh_TW dc.format.extent 8943022 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108152506 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 工作滿意度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 文獻計量分析 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 後設分析 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織承諾 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 轉型領導 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) job satisfaction en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) bibliometric analysis en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) meta-analysis en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) organizational commitment en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) transformational leadership en_US dc.title (題名) 國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能、 教師組織承諾、工作滿意度相關研究之後設分析 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Meta-analysis of Studies on the Relationship among Elementary School Principals` Transformational Leadership and School Effectiveness, Teachers` Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹.中文部分Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2016).。後設分析：Introduction to Meta-Analysis（吳政達審訂；初版）。臺北市：高等教育。（原著出版於2009年）Rosenthal, R. (1999) 。社會研究的後設分析程序（齊力譯；初版）。臺北市：弘智文化。（原著出版於1991年）丁一顧（2013）。校長轉型領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。屏東教育大學學報-教育類，41，71-100。王明傑（2012）。提升學校效能的領導。師友月刊，538，20-24。https://doi.org/10.6437/EM.201204.0020＊王秀燕（2004）。臺北縣市國民小學女性校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立師範學院。王姵方（2020）。臺灣中小學教師心理資本與幸福感關係之後設分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學。＊王俊杰（2010）。國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究--以臺北縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學。王博弘、林清達（2006）。台灣近二十年來校長領導實徵研究與學校效能關係之探討。花蓮教育大學學報（教育類），22，283-306。https://doi.org/10.7073/JNHUEA.200605.0283方瑀紳、李隆盛（2016）。資訊教育系所學位論文研究趨勢與課題：2004～2013學年的文獻計量分析。教育研究集刊，62（1），35-69。白崇亮（1986）。組織承諾研究：理論與實證。管理評論，5(2)，30-51。http://dx.doi.org/10.6656/MR.1986.5.2.CHI.30牟鍾福(2002)。國中體育教師組織正義與組織信任對組織承諾影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。全國法規資料庫（2016年6月1日）。國民教育法第九條。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070001＊李玉美（2020）。嘉義縣偏遠地區國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學。李茂能（2015）。傳統整合分析理論與實務:ESS & EXCEL。五南。李杰、陳超美（2017）。CiteSpace ：科技文本挖掘及可視化（第二版）。首都經濟貿易大學出版社。李杰（2022）。科學知識圖譜原理及應用：VOSviewer和CitNetExplorer初學者指南。高等教育。＊李貞儀（2005）。國民小學校長轉型領導互易領導與兼任行政職務教師工作滿意之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學。李家安、郭昭佑（2014）。教師工作滿意度的新觀點—從第三域的視角出發。臺灣教育評論月刊，3（2），101-105。＊李源景（2014）。國民小學校長轉型領導、教師工作壓力與學校效能之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。＊呂旺澤（2008）。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之研究—以組織承諾為中介變項（未出版之碩士論文）。亞洲大學。林生傳（2022）。教育大辭書：學校效能（Effectiveness of School）。國家教育研究院，樂詞網。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/eeeecbf4d9c8e93bfffb5cde829df19d/林金福（2003）。高中職校長轉型領導、知識管理與學校效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。＊林志興（2007）。台中縣國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學。林明地、連俊智（2013）。國小學校領導動力及其學校效能的差異分析。教育研究集刊，59（4），1-45。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082013125904001＊林俊雄（2009）。桃園縣國小校長轉型領導與體育教師組織承諾相關之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣體育大學（桃園）。林俊傑（2007）。組織承諾的理論與相關研究之探討。學校行政，51，35-53。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200709.0035＊邱成穩（2005）。新竹縣國民小學校長轉型領導與健康與體育學習領域教學效能相關之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學。＊邱素真（2008）。高雄市國民小學校長轉型領導、組織創新氣氛與教師組織承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中山大學。柯雅欽（2006）。國民小學校長轉型領導、組織創新與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。范織文（2002）。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。＊范熾文（2005）。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。臺中教育大學學報，19（2），1-22。范熾文（2007）。教師組織承諾：概念、發展、類別及其啟示。學校行政，50，128-144。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200707.0128周昌柏（2006）。國民小學教師組織承諾之研究。學校行政，46，52-71。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200611.0052＊周昌柏、范熾文（2006）。國小校長轉型領導、交易領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。花蓮教育大學學報，22，255-281。https://doi.org/10.7073/JNHUEA.200605.0255＊周裕隆（2008）。新竹縣市國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。玄奘大學。吳百祿（2004）。學校領導：願景、領導與管理。高雄復文。吳明清（2006）。學校領導的整合架構。台灣教育，642，2-5。http://dx.doi.org/10.6395/TER.200612.0002＊吳明雄（2001）。國民小學校長轉型領導行為與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中師範學院。＊吳明雄（2010）。國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導、教師知識管理與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺中教育大學。吳明鋗（2013）。大學教師工作投入、工作壓力、工作滿意與組織承諾之相關研究─以ESI核心競爭學門為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。＊吳佩樺（2008）。國民小學男女校長轉化領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。吳政達、陳芝仙（2006）。國內有關國中小校長教學領導研究之後設分析。教育學刊，26，47-83。吳勁甫（2018）。校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之後設分析。教育科學期刊，17（2），1-31。吳清山（1988a）。追求卓越的教育—學校效能模式初探。師友月刊，255，24-25。http://dx.doi.org/10.6437/EM.198809.0024吳清山（1988b）。好老師、好校長與好學校。師友月刊，258，21-22。http://dx.doi.org/10.6437/EM.198812.0021吳清山（2005）。書評：學校效能研究的價值（評R. J. Marzano之What Works in Schools: Translating Research into Action）。教育研究集刊，51（2），133-139。吳清山（2012，6月）。校長領導與學生學習。國家教育研究院電子報，42。https://reurl.cc/GAk29A吳清山、徐藝華（2015）。校長是風氣的標竿。師友月刊，573，55-58。http://dx.doi.org/10.6437/EM.201503_ (573).0013吳煥烘（2004）。學校行政領導理論與實務。五南。洪文義、盧建余、陳威有、戴經洲（2022）。工作特性與工作滿意度之研究。全球科技管理與教育期刊，11（2）15-28。https://doi.org/10.6617/GTME.202206_11 (2).0002姜定宇、鄭伯壎（2003）。組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行爲研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究，19，175-209。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=15609251-200309-x-19-175-209-a＊胡茜欣（2014）。臺北市公立國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立大學。洪敏哲（2016）。警察人員情緒勞動、心理資本、工作滿意與工作績效關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。＊涂欽文（2008）。國小教師知覺校長互易領導、轉型領導與組織承諾之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中原大學。秦夢群、吳勁甫（2009）。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與組織效能關係之研究：中介效果模式之檢證。當代教育研究季刊，17(3)，83-124。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2009.1703.03秦夢群（2013）。教育領導理論與應用。五南。秦夢群、吳勁甫（2013）。校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾之關係研究：多層次取向之後設分析。國立高雄師範大學教育學刊，41，1-48。秦夢群（2015）。教育行政理論與模式。五南。教育部（2023）。教育部部史。https://history.moe.gov.tw/Memorabilia?yearInterval=2002%EF%BC%8D2011＊梁丁財（2001）。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中師範學院。國家發展委員會（2022）。110年「都市及區域發展統計彙編」。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_77_4402陳巧芬、蔡文榮（2011）。臺灣近年來有關校長轉型領導與學校效能博碩士論文實徵研究之分析。教育科學期刊，10(1)，125-150。https://doi.org/10.6388/JES.201106.0125＊陳正華（2010）。宜蘭縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立東華大學。＊陳春蓮（2006）。國小校長轉型領導、組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。陳美秀（2022）。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師行為促進學生創造力關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。＊陳俊雄（2010）。高雄市國小校長轉型領導、組織氣候與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。陳俊瑋（2009）。台灣地區教師自我效能感研究之統合分析。彰化師大教育學報，15，41-64。陳悅、陳超美、胡志剛、王賢文（2014）。引文空間分析原理與應用：CiteSpace實用指南。科學出版社。陳景花（2018）。正向心理學介入對幸福與憂鬱效果之視覺化文獻回顧與後設分析（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學。陳景花（2019）。正向心裡學介入對幸福與憂鬱效果之後設分析。教育心理學報，50（4），551-586。陳景花（2022）。COVID-19心理研究之文獻計量分析。教育與心理研究，45（4），1-43。陳惠芳（2008）。在組織變革環境下賦權對組織承諾之影響研究－檢視內外控傾向與知覺心理契約違反之干擾效果。臺大管理論叢，18（2），1-26。http://dx.doi.org/10.6226/NTURM2008.18.2.1＊陳順良（2007）。高雄縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。＊陳舒婷（2014）。國小校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究—以桃園縣偏遠地區為例（未出版之碩士論文）。中原大學。＊陳德慶（2007）。桃竹苗地區公立國民小學校長之「轉型領導」、「家長式領導」與其「學校效能」關係之研究－以「教師組織承諾」為中介變項（未出版之碩士論文）。玄奘大學。＊陳維寧（2011）。國民小學校長轉型領導、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之研究~以原高雄市為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。＊陳學賢（2006）。高雄市國小校長轉型領導、學校願景發展與教師組織承諾關係之研究。臺東大學教育學報，17(1)，77-106。http://dx.doi.org/10.6778/NTTUERJ.200606.0077＊陳麗卿（2014）。高雄市國民小學校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。＊許淑媛（2010）。內部行銷、校長轉型領導、組織承諾與組織開放氣氛對學校效能之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。南華大學。黃宗顯（2008）。學校領導：心理論與實踐。五南。＊黃秋燕（2009）。國民小學女性校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。逢甲大學。＊黃淑慧（2013）。高雄市國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學。＊黃種斌（2005）。桃園縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹師範學院。黃薏璇、吳政達(2017)。學校領導研究熱點與前沿的文獻計量分析(2000-2017)。教育研究月刊，282，114-131。＊黃寶塘（2011）。臺南縣市國小校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台南大學。程煒庭（2021）。校長轉型領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能之關係研究─後設分析與結構方程模式之應用(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。張攸萍（2019）。幼兒園園長領導相關研究之後設分析—整合文獻計量方法之應用(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。＊張宏毅（2002）。台北縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北師範學院。＊張明忠（2006）。國小校長轉型領導、健體領域教師組織承諾與工作滿意度關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣體育學院。張紹勳（2021）。Meta分析實作:使用Excel與CMA程式。五南。張新堂（2005）。高級中學知識管理、教師專業成長需求、與組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。張慶勳（1997）。學校組織轉化領導研究。高雄復文。＊張賢坤（2004）。桃園縣國民小學校長轉型領導與教師教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北師範學院。葉佳文（2007）。臺灣地區公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。詹志禹(1988)。後設分析：量化的文獻探討法。思與言雜誌社，26(4)，311-325。＊趙偉勝（2007）。國小校長轉型領導、教師工作滿意與工作投入關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中華大學。蔡宗興、曾瑞譙（2008）。雲嘉南地區國民中學教育人員知覺校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政，57，110-146。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200809.0110蔡炳坤（2007）。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學。蔡進雄（2000）。轉型領導與學校效能。師大書苑。蔡進雄（2005）。學校領導理論研究。師大書苑。蔡進雄（2005）。超越轉型領導：國民中小學校長新轉型領導影響教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊，13，37-63。蔡進雄（2018）。從學校效能到學校改進之探析：兼論無靈魂的評鑑。教育行政論壇，10（2），1-14。＊蘇美珠（2007）。高雄縣國民小學校長轉型領導行為與教師組織承諾、工作投入關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中山大學。劉秀曦（2020）。數據活起來，教育有未來。國家教育研究院電子報。https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=3&edm_no=194&content_no=3450劉雅菁（1998）。國民小學校長運用轉型領導之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。＊劉創任（2008）。台北縣國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導行為與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學。盧心雨（2011）。體育行政人員工作滿意、工作壓力、組織承諾與工作績效之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。＊盧美文（2006）。國小校長轉型領導、組織學習與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立花蓮教育大學。謝欣頤（2021）。教師對資訊與通信科技的態度研究之後設分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學。貳.英文部分Admiraal, W., Veldman, I., Mainhard, T., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2019). A typology of veteran teachers’ job satisfaction: Their relationships with their students and the nature of their work. Social Psychology of Education, 22(2), 337-355.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-09477-zAllen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.xAlsaeedi, F., & Male, T. (2013). Transformational leadership and globalization: Attitudes of school principals in Kuwait. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 640-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213488588Alzoraiki, M., Ahmad, A. R., Ateeq, A. A., Naji, G. M. A., Almaamari, Q., & Beshr, B. A. H. (2023). Impact of teachers’ commitment to the relationship between transformational leadership and sustainable teaching performance. Sustainability, 15(5), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620Aydin, A., Sarier, Y., & Uysal, S. (2013). The effect of school principals` leadership styles on teachers` organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 13(2), 806-811.Balyer, A., & Oezcan, K. (2012). Cultural adaptation of headmasters` transformational leadership scale and a study on teachers` perceptions. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 12, 103-128.Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Bass, B. M. (1990). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181-217.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843 (99)00016-8Baeza, M. A., Gonzalez, J. A., & Wang, Y. (2018). Job flexibility and job satisfaction among Mexican professionals: A socio-cultural explanation. Employee Relations, 40(5), 921-942. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-12-2016-0236Bellibas, M. S., Kılınc, A. C., & Polatcan, M. (2021). The moderation role of transformational leadership in the effect of instructional leadership on teacher professional learning and instructional practice: An integrated leadership perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 776-814.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211035079Bellibas, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Akyürek, M. İ. (2022). Principal leadership typologies and their relationship with teacher self-efficacy and commitment: A latent profile mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-20. Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221139932Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2017). The mediating role of principals’ transformational leadership behaviors in promoting teachers’ emotional wellness at work: A study in Israeli primary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 316-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215617947Berkovich, I. (2018a). When the going gets tough: Schools in challenging circumstances and the effectiveness of principals` leadership styles. Journal of Community Applied Social Psychology, 28, 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2372Berkovich, I. (2018b). Will it sink or will it float: Putting three common conceptions about principals’ transformational leadership to the test. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 888-907.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217714253Berkovich, I., & Bogler, R. (2021). Conceptualising the mediating paths linking effective school leadership to teachers’ organisational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 410-429.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220907321Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662-683.https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610121969460Bogler, R. (2002). Two profiles of schoolteachers: A discriminant analysis of job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(6), 665-673.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X (02)00026-4Borgmann, L., Rowold, J., & Bormann, K. C. (2016). Integrating leadership research: A meta-analytical test of Yukl`s meta-categories of leadership. Personnel Review, 45(6), 1340-1366.Bottery, M. (2006). Education and globalization: Redefining the role of the educational professional. Educational Review, 58(1), 95-113.https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500352804Breevaart, K., & Zacher, H. (2019). Main and interactive effects of weekly transformational and laissez-faire leadership on followers’ trust in the leader and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(2)，384-409.https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12253Brüggemann, P., & Rajguru, K. (2022). Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) 3.0: A software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10(4), 425-429.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-022-00184-5Burić, I., Kovačić, M. P., & Huić, A. (2021). Transformational leadership and instructional quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: A moderated mediation analysis. Društvena Istraživanja, 30(2), 181-202. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.30.2.01Burkhauser, S. (2017). How much do school principals’ matter when it comes to teacher working conditions? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 126-145. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716668028Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper and Row.Cansoy, R., & Polatcan, M. (2019). The relationship between school principals` leadership and teachers` organisational commitment: A systematic review. Bartin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 1-31.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.441189Çayak, S. (2021). The effect of sustainable leadership behaviors of school principals on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 12(1), 102-120.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2021-0008Chen, L.-H. (2008).Job satisfaction among information system (IS) personnel. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.012Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Principal`s leadership as a critical factor for school performance: Evidence from multi‐levels of primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345940050306Chin, J. M.-C. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education. Review. 8(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029253Cleavenger, D. J., & Munyon, T. P. (2013). It`s how you frame it: Transformational leadership and the meaning of work. Business Horizons, 56(3), 351-360.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.002Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed). Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D. & Perry, N. E. (2011). Predicting teacher commitment: The impact of school climate and social–emotional learning. Psychology in the Schools, 48(10), 1034-1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20611Day, C. (2000). Beyond transformational leadership.Educational Leadership, 57(7), 56-59. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ609645Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gorgen, K. (2020). Successful school leadership. In education development trust. Education Development Trust.Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (1998). A three domain model of teacher and school executive career satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 362-378.https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239810211545Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2016). The effects of autonomy gap in personnel policy, principal leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy on their organizational commitment. Asia Pacific Education. Review. 17, 339-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9428-7Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2017). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 959-977.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216653975Draghici, A., Dursun, S., Bașol O., Boatca, M. E., & Gaureanu A.（2022）. The mediating role of safety climate in the relationship between transformational safety leadership and safe behavior—The case of two companies in Turkey and Romania. Sustainability, 14(14), 8464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148464Dumay, X., & Galand, B. (2012). The multilevel impact of transformational leadership on teacher commitment: Cognitive and motivational pathways. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 703-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.577889Dutta, V., & Sahney, S. (2016). School leadership and its impact on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 941-958.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2014-0170Edinger, S. K., & Edinger, M. J. (2018). Improving teacher job satisfaction: The roles of social capital, teacher efficacy, and support. The Journal of Psychology, 152(8), 573-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1489364Effendi, Y. R., & Sahertian, P. (2022). Principals` transformational leadership in strengthening character education at senior high school level (SMA) in Indonesia. South African Journal of Education, 42(2), 1-11.https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42n2a2034Ellen D., Annie H., & Filip D. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational Research Review, 27, 110-125.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003Ferguson, M. (2013). When the (education) revolution comes. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(2), 68-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500215Fischer, S. A, Jones, J., & Verran, J. A. (2018). Consensus achievement of leadership, organisational and individual factors that influence safety climate: Implications for nursing management. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(1), 50-58.https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12519Freeman, G. T., & Fields, D. (2020). School leadership in an urban context: complicating notions of effective principal leadership, organizational setting, and teacher commitment to students. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 26(2), 318-338.https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1818133Ghosh R. (2012). School effectiveness: Pursuing excellence and inclusion. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Development, 1(2), 1-6.https://doi.org/10.6228/APJED.01.02.01Gilbert, R. B., Adesope, O. O., & Schroeder, N. L. (2014) .Efficacy beliefs, job satisfaction, stress and their influence on the occupational commitment of english-medium content teachers in the Dominican Republic. Educational Psychology, 34(7), 876-899. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.814193Goktas, E. (2021). Effectiveness correlates of school leadership styles and teachers` job satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(4), 1023-1044. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2021.04.006Gomes, G., Seman, L. O., & Carmona, L. J. D. M. (2021). Service innovation through transformational leadership, work-life balance, and organisational learning capability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(4), 365-378.https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1814953Gong, M. Z., & Subramaniam, N. (2020). Principal leadership style and school performance: Mediating roles of risk management culture and management control systems use in Australian schools. Accounting & Finance, 60(3), 2427-2466.https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12416Grissom, J. A., & Bartanen, B. (2019). Strategic retention: Principal effectiveness and teacher turnover in multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 514-555.https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218797931Grissom, J. A., Egalite. A. J., & Lindsay. C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesisHallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2003). Understanding the principal’s contribution to school improvement. In M. Wallace and L. Poulson (Eds.), Learning to read critically in educational leadership and management (pp. 215-235). Sage.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216576Herrera, R. (2010). Principal leadership and school effectiveness: Perspectives from principals and teachers (Order No. 3410406) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Western Michigan University, Available from Education Database; ProQuest Central. (503232723).Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. (2005). What We Know About Leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.169Hsiao, H.-C., & Chang, J.-C. (2011). The role of organizational learning in transformational leadership and organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 621-631.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9165-xHsu, N., Newman, D. A., & Badura, K. L. (2022). Emotional intelligence and transformational leadership: Meta-analysis and explanatory model of female leadership advantage. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 104.https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040104Huang, T. H., TING, S. C., & Chen, B. C. (2021). The impacts of principal`s transformational leadership and environmental obstacles on teachers` job satisfaction: The mediation of professional learning community. Education Journal, 49(2), 191-215.Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers` and teacher leaders` job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450902909840Hussein, B., & Yesiltas, M. (2020). The influence of emotional intelligence on employee’s counterwork behavior and organizational commitment: Mediating role of transformational leadership. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 71, 377-402.Jacobsen, C. B., & Staniok C. D. (2020). Sharing the fire? The moderating role of transformational leadership congruence on the relationship between managers’ and employees’ organizational commitment. International Public Management Journal, 23(4), 564-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1486930Jacobsen, C. B., Andersen, L. B., Bøllingtoft, A., & Eriksen, T. L.M. (2022). Can leadership training improve organizational effectiveness? Evidence from a randomized field experiment on transformational and transactional leadership. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13356Jantzi, D., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Toward an explanation of variation in teachers’ perceptions of transformational school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 512-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X9603200404Jung, J.-Y., & Woo, J.-G. (2022). Structural model analysis of factors affecting sustainable teacher job satisfaction in Korea: Evidence from TALIS 2018. Sustainability, 14(13), 8014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138014Kalkan, U., Aksal, F. A., Gazi, Z. A., Atasoy, R., & Dağlı, G. (2020). The relationship between school administrators` leadership styles, School culture, and organizational Image. Sage Open, 10(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902081Karadag, E. (2020). The effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement: A cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2008 and 2018. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09612-1Kaya, M., & Demir, M. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between school leadership and collective teacher efficacy: A cultural comparison. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2022.2128431Khasawneh, S., Omari, A., & Abu-Tineh, A. M. (2012). The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment: The case for vocational teachers in Jordan. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(4), 494-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212438217Kılınç, A. Ç., Polatcan, M., Savaş, G., & Er, E. (2022). How transformational leadership influences teachers’ commitment and innovative practices: Understanding the moderating role of trust in principal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221082803Kim, H. D., & Cruz, A. B. (2022).Gender differences in the relationships between coach transformational leadership and player satisfaction and commitment: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13,915391.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915391Kirby, P. C., Paradise, L. V., & King, M. I. (1992). Extraordinary leaders in education: Understanding transformational leadership. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(5), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941130Klassen, R. M., & Anderson, C. J. K. (2009). How times change: Secondary teachers` job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in 1962 and 2007. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 745-759. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802688721Klassen, R. M. (2010). Teacher stress: The mediating role of collective efficacy beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(5), 342-350.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383069Koh, W. L., Steers, R. M., & Terborg, J. R. (1995). The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160404Lambert, E. G., Qureshi, H., Frank, J., Klahm, C., & Smith, B. (2018). Job stress, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment and their associations with job burnout among Indian police officers: A research note. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 33(2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-017-9236-yLambert, E. G., Pasupuleti, S., Cluse-Tolar, T., Srinivasa, S. R., & Jiang, S. (2021). Research note: The effects of organizational trust on the work attitudes of U.S. social workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 48(1), 120-133.https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2021.1976350Lee, Y. P., Wang, Y. H., Chen, I. H., & Yeh, Y. T. (2019). Calling and organizational commitment: A moderated mediation model of career commitment and person-organization fit. Journal of Management and Business Research, 36(4), 369-389. https://doi.org/10.6504/JMBR.201912_36 (4).0002Leithwood, K., & Poplin, M. S. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8-12.Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451-479. https://doi.org/ 10.1076/sesi.10.4.451.3495Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Review of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/pages/how-leadership-influences-student-learning.aspxLeithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000).The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-129.https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127).Litz, D., & Scott, S. (2017). Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 566-587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216636112Liu, X. S., & Ramsey, J. (2008). Teachers’ job satisfaction: Analyses of the teacher follow-up survey in the United States for 2000–2001. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1173-1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.010Lopes, J., & Oliveira, C. (2020). Teacher and school determinants of teacher job satisfaction: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(4), 641-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1764593Ma, X., & MacMillan, R. B. (1999). Influences of workplace conditions on teachers` job satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 39-47.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597627Malinen, O. P., & Savolainen, H. (2016). The effect of perceived school climate and teacher efficacy in behavior management on job satisfaction and burnout: A longitudinal study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 144-152.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.012Malloch, K. (2014). Beyond transformational leadership to greater engagement: Inspiring innovation in complex organizations. Nurse Leader, 12(2), 60-63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2014.01.004Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253412Mathieu, C., Fabi, B., Lacoursière, R., & Raymond, L. (2016). The role of supervisory behavior, job satisfaction and organizational commitment on employee turnover. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(1), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.25McCarley, T. A., Peters, M. L., & Decman, J. M. (2016). Transformational leadership related to school climate: A multi-level analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(2), 322-342.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549966Menon, M. E. (2023). Transformational school leadership and the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceptions of teachers in Cyprus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231166515Messmann, G., Evers, A., & Kreijns, K. (2022). The role of basic psychological needs satisfaction in the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 33(1), 29-45.https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21451Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842Michael R., & Dominik P. (2021) School principals’ educational goals and leadership styles for digital transformation: Results from case studies in upper secondary schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-19. Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13603124.2021.2014979Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010).Preferred reporting Items for systematic and meta-analysis (PRISMA) group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341.Nasra, M. A., & Heilbrunn, S. (2016). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior in the Arab educational system in Israel: The impact of trust and job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(3), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549975Nguni, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers` job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145-177.https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565746Odhiambo, G., & Hii, A. (2012). Key stakeholders’ perceptions of effective school leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(2), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211432412OECD (2013).Glossary of statistical terms: Bibliometrics. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=198OECD (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners, TALIS. OECD.https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en.OECD (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals, TALIS. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-enOkubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 1997/01). https://doi.org/10.1787/208277770603Pan, H.-L. W., & Chen, W.-Y. (2021). How principal leadership facilitates teacher learning through teacher leadership: Determining the critical path. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 454-470.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220913553Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2020). What motivates people to teach, and why do they leave? Accountability, performativity and teacher retention. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417Qureshi, H., Lambert, E. G., Holbrook, M. A., Frank, J., Hines, C., & Thakur, M. (2023). Testing the job demands-resources model for Indian correctional staff job satisfaction. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 72,100564.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100564Rodríguez, D., Van Landeghem, H., Lasio, V., & Buyens, D. (2017), Determinants of job satisfaction in a lean environment. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(2), 134-152.Rodriguez, L. A., Swain, W. A., & Springer, M. G. (2020). Sorting through performance evaluations: The influence of performance evaluation reform on teacher attrition and mobility. American Educational Research Journal, 57(6), 2339-2377.https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220910989Rosenthal, R. (1979).The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research (Rev. ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984997Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006) .Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 179-199.https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565795Ryan, R. (2016).Cochrane Consumers and Communicatin Group: Meta-analysis. Cochrane Consumers and communication.https://cccrg.cochrane.org/sites/cccrg.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/meta-analysis_revised_december_1st_1_2016.pdfSchwarz, UV, Hasson, H., & Tafvelin, S. (2016). Leadership training as an occupational health intervention: Improved safety and sustained productivity. Safety Science, 81, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.020Seidel, T. (2008). Keyword: Criteria of school effectiveness in international empirical research. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 11(3), 348-367.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-008-0032-4Seltzer, J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16(4), 693-703.https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600403Sesen, H., & Basim, N. H. (2012). Impact of satisfaction and commitment on teachers’ organizational citizenship. Educational Psychology, 32(4), 475-491.https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2012.670900Shila, J. M., & Sevilla, A. V. (2015). The impact of the principals` leadership style on teachers` job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 37-43.Silins, H. C. (1994). Leadership characteristics and school improvement. Australian Journal of Education, 38(3), 266-281.https://doi.org/10.1177/000494419403800306Slater, R. O., & Teddlie, C. (1992). Toward a theory of school effectiveness and leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(4), 247-257.https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345920030402Steers, R.M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organisational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391745Strawser, M. G., Smith, S., & Rubenking, B. (2022). A focus on faculty: Mentorship, organizational identification, and job satisfaction. The Journal of Faculty Development, 36(1), 38-47.Tan, C. Y., Gao, L., & Shi, M. (2020). Second-order meta-analysis synthesizing the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 469-490.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220935456Tesfaw, T. A. (2014). The relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction: The case of government secondary school teachers in Ethiopia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(6), 903-918.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214551948The Wallace Foundation. (2013). The school principal as leader: Guiding schools to better teaching and learning. https://reurl.cc/QW381qThomas, L., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., Kelchtermans, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2020). Transformational school leadership as a key factor for teachers’ job attitudes during their first year in the profession. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 106-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218781064Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496-536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11400185Tickle, B. R., Chang, M., & Kim, S. (2011). Administrative support and its mediating effect on US public school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 342-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.002Tingle, E., Corrales, A., & Peters, M. L. (2019). Leadership development programs: Investing in school principals. Educational Studies, 45, 1-16. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03055698.2017.1382332Top, M., Tarcan, M., Tekingündüz, S., & Hikmet, N. (2013). An analysis of relationships among transformational leadership, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational trust in two Turkish hospitals. The International Journal of Health Planning and Managemen, 28(3), 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2154Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 71-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2014). What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 96-134.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13489019Vanmol, S., De Vos. S., Beausaert, S., & De Wilde, J. (2022). How does newly qualified teachers` collegial network foster their feedback-seeking behaviour and job satisfaction? Teachers and Teaching, 28(6), 703-723.https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13540602.2022.2098267Veličković, V.M., Višnjić, A., Jović, S., Radulović, O., Šargić, C., Mihajlović, J., & Mladenović, J. (2014).Organizational commitment and job satisfaction among nurses in Serbia: A factor analysis. Nursing Outlook, 62(6), 415-427.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2014.05.003Whang C. (2021, February 9). The role of school heads and why they matter during the COVID pandemic. OECD Education and Skills Today.https://oecdedutoday.com/role-school-principals-heads-covid/Whitehead, B., Boschee, F., & Decker, R. (2013). Nature of leadership: challenge of the times. In B. Whitehead, F. Boschee, & R. Decker (Eds), The Principal: Leadership for a Global Society (pp. 3-25). SAGE Publications, Inc.https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781544308609Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2000). Wilderness challenge programs for delinquent youth: A meta-analysis of outcome evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189 (99)00040-3Yohannes, M. E., & Wasonga, T. A. (2021). Leadership styles and teacher job satisfaction in Ethiopian schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211041625Yokota, H. (2020). Mapping four leadership styles in Japan: How has the role of the principal been shaped by policies? Journal of Educational Administration, 58(2), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2019-0032Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843 (99)00013-2Zeinabadi, H. (2023). Breaking down the walls of weak knowledge-sharing among Iranian teachers: Investigating a less-considered leadership role of principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(1), 176-197.Zhu, M., Guo, C.Y., Hou, Y.C., & Chiu, M.S. (2021) Graduate employment in higher education: Applying bibliometrics to world-system theory. Journal of Education and Work, 34(3), 356-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.1922621 zh_TW
