Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 家庭治療訓練方案之成效研究
Efficacy of a Family Therapy Training Program: An Evaluation Study作者 余幸子
Yu, XingZi貢獻者 趙文滔<br>修慧蘭
Chao, Wentao<br>Hsiu, Hui-Lain
余幸子
Yu, XingZi關鍵詞 家庭治療
訓練
核心能力
家庭治療訓練成效研究
Family Therapy
Training
Core Competencies
Family Therapy Training Outcomes Research日期 2023 上傳時間 1-Sep-2023 16:37:18 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究旨在探究:(1)一項本地家庭治療訓練方案中不同單元對受訓者可能帶來的學習成效;(2)探討有助於學習成效發生的課程設計與執行因素;(3)評估家庭治療訓練方案於結束三個月後,對受訓者個人生活的影響及於工作場域的遷移效果。本研究對象的家庭治療訓練方案歷時8個月,共112小時,研究共招募到10位受訓者接受訪談,包含三位諮商心理師、一位臨床心理師、三位社工師以及兩位學校輔導老師,其工作場域有國中輔導室、大專院校諮商中心、社福機構、醫院。本研究使用質化輔以量化的研究方法,量化部分使用相依樣本t檢定與描述統計,質化資料則蒐集訓練前後受訓者的家庭治療師核心能力量表分數、課後滿意度問卷、學習效果自陳量表;再於訓練方案結束后,以半結構式個別訪談蒐集受訓者經驗,訓練結束後三個月再以焦點團體進行訪談。研究結果摘述如下:一、 受訓者參與家庭治療訓練的動機有訓練前遭遇工作困境、對於家庭治療有興趣、及訓練方案本身有吸引力。二、 量化資料分析顯示,受訓者對於訓練方案各面向滿意度高、學習效果佳、在家庭治療師核心能力量表的整體及四個不同能力模塊的前後测分數差異均達顯著。質化分析結果進一步呈現受訓者接受訓練後在其工作場域確實出現成效。三、 在訓練結束三個月後,受訓者的個人生活改變體現在兩個方面:一為發展出新視角,開始將生活體驗與家庭治療工作連結;另一為受訓者個人關係獲得改善,包含伴侶關係及與原生家庭關係。四、 訓練後受訓者的變化包含四個方面:(1)自我效能感顯著提升,主動與系統合作之意願增強;(2)諮商會談效果提升,工作勝任度提升;(3)受訓者的工作適應狀況提升;(4)團隊成員認同受訓者的專業能力,對受訓者的信任度提高。根據家庭治療師核心能力,本研究探討受訓者在家庭治療師核心能力不同內涵上進步的情況,同時發現心理師及社工師背景對受訓者之學習路徑及成果存在差異。本研究並進一步探討受訓者工作場域因素對學習成效的可能影響,最後根據結論與討論,對未來家庭治療相關訓練及研究提出建議。
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a family therapy training program in Taipei. It also explored the curriculum design and execution factors that contributed to learning outcomes, and assessed the impact of the family therapy training program on the trainees` personal lives and clinical outcomes three months post-training.The study focused on an 8-month family therapy training program, totaling 112 hours. Ten trainees were recruited for interviews, including three counseling psychologists, one clinical psychologist, three social workers, and two school guidance counselors. Their workplaces ranged from junior high counseling offices and tertiary education counseling centers to social welfare institutions and hospitals.This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. The quantitative portion utilized paired-sample t-tests and descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were collected from pre- and post-training scores on the Family Therapist Core Competency Scale, post-session satisfaction questionnaires, and self-report learning outcome scales. After the training program concluded, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted to gather trainees` experiences. Three months post-training, focus group interviews were held. Key findings include:1. Trainees` motivations for participating in the family therapy training were challenges faced in their work before the training, interest in family therapy, and the distinctive features of the training program.2. Quantitative data analysis showed high satisfaction across various aspects of the training program, positive learning outcomes, and significant pre- and post-test differences in scores on the overall Family Therapist Core Competency Scale and its four distinct ability modules. Qualitative analysis further revealed an improvement in clinical work outcomes after the training.3. Three months after the training, changes in trainees` personal lives were evident in two aspects: (1) the development of new perspectives, leading them to link their life experiences with family therapy work; (2) improvements in personal relationships, including relationships with partners and families.4. Clinical changes in trainees post-training encompassed: (1) significant enhancement in self-efficacy as therapists and strengthened willingness to work collaboratively; (2) enhanced effectiveness in sessions; (3) improved work adaptability; (4) increased recognition and trust from team members.Based on the core competencies of family therapists, this study examined the progress of trainees across different domains of family therapist core competencies. It also identified differences in learning paths and outcomes for therapists and social workers. The study further explored how the work environment might influence learning outcomes. Drawing from these conclusions and discussions, recommendations for future family therapy-related training and research are provided.參考文獻 王文科、王智弘(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度,彰化師大教育學報(第29-50頁)。吳惠文、許雅惠(2015)。「家」內鬩牆-兒少安置機構專業人員之專業互動分析,東吳社會工作學報(第25-51頁)。吳靖國(2010)。質性研究:從理解「人」開始,銘傳教育電子期刊(第12冊,第20-34頁)。吳瓊治(2006)。訓練成效的評鑑,品質月刊(第42冊,第44-48頁)。李岳庭(2018)。反思含攝文化下的Bowen理論及其運用在華人文化中,中華輔導與諮商學報(第23-44頁)。林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析,身心障礙研究季刊(第3冊,第122-136頁)。胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論,方法及本土女性研究實例,台北:巨流。許維素、游于萱(2017)。輔導教師之焦點解決督導員訓練成效研究,中華輔導與諮商學報(第147-182頁)。陳秉華、游淑瑜(2001)。台灣的家庭文化與家庭治療,亞洲輔導學報(香港)(第8冊,第153-174頁)。賈紅鶯(1999)。以結構─策略學派的觀點建構一個家族治療的改變歷程,臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文(第1-395頁)。賈紅鶯(2011)。家族治療的文化脈絡與靈性議題:家暴的困境,轉變與反思,中華輔導與諮商學報(第124-149頁)。熊秉荃(2021)。醫療家族治療於臺灣之發展與應用:我的實踐,教育心理學報(第52冊,第665-683頁)。趙文滔(2006)。台灣婚姻與家族治療實務之發展:十一個案例的比較分析,本土心理學研究(第73-103頁)。蔣葦(2022)。成為家庭治療師-三位臺灣家庭治療師的專業發展旅程,國立臺北教育大學心理與諮商學系碩士班碩士論文。鄭夙芬(2005)。焦點團體研究法的理論與應用,選舉研究(第12冊,第211-239頁)。Anderson, S. A. (1992). EVALUATION OF AN ACADEMIC FAMILY THERAPY TRAINING PROGRAM: CHANGES IN TRAINEES`RELATIONSHIP AND INTERVENTION SKILLS. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18(4), 365-376.Asiimwe, R., Lesch, E., Karume, M., & Blow, A. J. Expanding our international reach: Trends in the development of systemic family therapy training and implementation in Africa. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12514Avis, J., & Sprenkle, D. (2007). Outcome research on family therapy training: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1990.tb00846.xAvis, J. M., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1990). OUTCOME RESEARCH ON FAMILY THERAPY TRAINING: A SUBSTANTIVE AND METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW2. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16(3), 241-264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1990.tb00846.xBaer, J. S., Wells, E. A., Rosengren, D. B., Hartzler, B., Beadnell, B., & Dunn, C. (2009). Agency context and tailored training in technology transfer: a pilot evaluation of motivational interviewing training for community counselors. J Subst Abuse Treat, 37(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2009.01.003Beidas, R. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2010). Training Therapists in Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Review of Studies From a Systems-Contextual Perspective. Clin Psychol (New York), 17(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01187.xBreitmayer, B. J., Ayres, L., & Knafl, K. A. (1993). Triangulation in qualitative research: evaluation of completeness and confirmation purposes. Image J Nurs Sch, 25(3), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00788.xBreunlin, D. C., Schwartz, R. C., Krause, M. S., & Selby, L. M. (1983). Evaluating family therapy training: The development of an instrument. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01482.xByington, K., Fischer, J., Walker, L., & Freedman, E. (1997). Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Multicultural Counseling Ethics and Assessment Training. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 28, 15 - 19.Chao, W., & Huang, W. (2013a). The Development of Family Therapy Practice and Training in Taiwan: A Review and Prospects for the Future. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9261-7Chao, W., & Huang, W. (2013b). The Development of Family Therapy Practice and Training in Taiwan: A Review and Prospects for the Future. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35(2), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9261-7Chao, W., & Lou, Y. C. (2018). Construction of core competencies for family therapists in Taiwan. Journal of Family Therapy, 40(2), 265-286.Cleghorn, J. M., & Levin, S. (1973). Training family therapists by setting learning objectives. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 43(3), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1973.tb00815.xCordes, M. L. (2014). A transcendental phenomenological study of developmental math students` experiences and perceptions. Liberty University.Crane, D. R., & Christenson, J. D. (2012). A Summary Report of the Cost-Effectiveness of the Profession and Practice of Marriage and Family Therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34(2), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9187-5Cunanan, E. D., & McCollum, E. E. (2006). What Works When Learning Solution-Focused Brief Therapy. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 17(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J085v17n01_04D`Aniello, C., & Fife, S. T. (2020). A 20-Year Review of Common Factors Research in Marriage and Family Therapy: A Mixed Methods Content Analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(4), 701-718. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12427D’Aniello, C., & Hertlein, K. M. (2017). Integrating Gatekeeping Practices into Core Competencies in MFT Training: Development of the Core Competency-Based Assessment Measure. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(3), 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9416-zDeacon, S. A., & Piercy, F. P. (2000). Qualitative evaluation of family therapy programs: a participatory approach. J Marital Fam Ther, 26(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00274.xDeCaporale-Ryan, L. N., Dadiz, R., & Peyre, S. E. (2016). Simulation-based learning: From theory to practice. Families, Systems, & Health, 34, 159-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000203Deng, L., Lin, X., Lan, J., & Fang, X. (2013). Family Therapy in China. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9273-3Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (2011). Therapist competence, therapy quality, and therapist training. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(6), 373-378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.005Falicov, C., Constantine, J., & Breunlin, D. (1981). Teaching Family Therapy: A Program Based on Training Objectives. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1981.tb01405.xFife, S. T., D`Aniello, C., Scott, S., & Sullivan, E. (2019). Marriage and Family Therapy Students’ Experience with Common Factors Training. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12333Fragkiadaki, E., Triliva, S., Balamoutsou, S., & Prokopiou, A. (2013). The path towards a professional identity: An IPA study of Greek family therapy trainees. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13(4), 290-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2013.768287Gehart, D. (2011). The core competencies and MFT education: Practical aspects of transitioning to a learning-centered, outcome-based pedagogy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(3), 344-354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00205.xGivropoulou, D., & Tseliou, E. (2018). Moving Between Dialogic Reflexive Processes In Systemic Family Therapy Training: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study of Trainees’ Experience. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12237Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family therapy : an overview (4th ed.). Wadsworth Thomson.Greene, J., & McClintock, C. (1985). Triangulation in Evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9, 523 - 545.Hales, D. (2010). An Introduction to Triangulation. UNAIDS. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/sub_landing/files/10_4-Intro-to-triangulation-MEF.pdfHeath, A. W., McKenna, B. C., & Atkinson, B. J. (1988). TOWARD THE IDENTIFICATION OF VARIABLES FOR EVALUATING FAMILY THERAPY WORKSHOPS*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1988.tb00746.xHelge Rønnestad, M., & Ladany, N. (2006). The impact of psychotherapy training: Introduction to the special section. Psychotherapy Research, 16(3), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300600612241Herschell, A. D., Kolko, D. J., Baumann, B. L., & Davis, A. C. (2010). The role of therapist training in the implementation of psychosocial treatments: a review and critique with recommendations. Clin Psychol Rev, 30(4), 448-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.005Hodgson, J. L., Johnson, L. N., Ketring, S. A., Wampler, R. S., & Lamson, A. L. (2005). INTEGRATING RESEARCH AND CLINICAL TRAINING IN MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY TRAINING PROGRAMS. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01544.xHogan, R. L. (2007). The historical development of program evaluation: Exploring past and present. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, 2(4), 5.Imber-Black, E. (2014). Eschewing certainties: the creation of family therapists in the 21st century. Fam Process, 53(3), 371-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12091JD, K. D. K. (2009). Implementing the four levels: A practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs: Easyread super large 24pt edition. ReadHowYouWant. com.Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative science quarterly, 24(4), 602-611.Karam, E. A., Blow, A. J., Sprenkle, D. H., & Davis, S. D. (2015). Strengthening the Systemic Ties that Bind: Integrating Common Factors into Marriage and Family Therapy Curricula [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12096]. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(2), 136-149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12096Karimi, H., Piercy, F., & Savla, J. (2019). A Chronological Map of Common Factors across Three Stages of Marriage and Family Therapy. In. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85357Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2005). Transferring learning to behavior: Using the four levels to improve performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Great Ideas Revisited. Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs. Revisiting Kirkpatrick`s Four-Level Model. Training and Development, 50, 54-59.Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2007). Implementing the Four Levels: A Practical Guide for Effective Evaluation of Training Programs. 94.Kniskern, D. P., & Gurman, A. S. (1979). Research on Training in Marriage and Family Therapy: Status, Issues, and Directions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 5(3), 83-94.Lal, A., & Jonathan, N. (2023). Marriage and Family Therapy Education and Training: The Development of a Competency-Based Model. Contemporary Family Therapy, 45(2), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-021-09600-xLambert-Shute, J. J., Nguyen, H. N., Peterson, P. W., & Pirasteh, A. B. (2019). Reflecting on the Past: A Content Analysis of Family Therapy Research from 2000-2015. J Marital Fam Ther, 45(2), 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12334LEBOW, J. (1997). The Integrative Revolution in Couple and Family Therapy. Family process, 36(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1997.00001.xLee, I., Robert E., & Nichols, W. C. (2010). The Doctoral Education of Professional Marriage and Family Therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(3), 259-269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00158.xLee, R. E., Nichols, D. P., Nichols, W. C., & Odom, T. (2004). TRENDS IN FAMILY THERAPY SUPERVISION: THE PAST 25 YEARS AND INTO THE FUTURE. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01222.xLiao, S.-C., & Hsu, S.-Y. (2019). Evaluating A Continuing Medical Education Program: New World Kirkpatrick Model Approach. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 8. https://doi.org/10.32327/IJMESS/8.4.2019.17Liddle, H., & Halpin, R. (2007). Family Therapy Training and Supervision Literature: A Comparative Review*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 4, 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1978.tb00543.xLiddle, H. A. (1991). Training and supervision in family therapy: A comprehensive and critical analysis. In Handbook of family therapy, Vol. 2. (pp. 638-697). Brunner/Mazel.Liddle, H. A. (2016). Multidimensional Family Therapy: Evidence Base for Transdiagnostic Treatment Outcomes, Change Mechanisms, and Implementation in Community Settings. Family process, 55(3), 558-576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12243Liddle, H. A., & Halpin, R. J. (1978). Family Therapy Training and Supervision Literature: A Comparative Review*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 4(4), 77-98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1978.tb00543.xLiddle, H. A., Rowe, C. L., Gonzalez, A., Henderson, C. E., Dakof, G. A., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2006). Changing provider practices, program environment, and improving outcomes by transporting multidimensional family therapy to an adolescent drug treatment setting. Am J Addict, 15 Suppl 1, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550490601003698Liddle, H. A., & Saba, G. W. (1982). TEACHING FAMILY THERAPY AT THE INTRODUCTORY LEVEL: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL EMPHASIZING A PATTERN WHICH CONNECTS TRAINING AND THERAPY*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1982.tb01422.xMiles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.Miller, J. K., Todahl, J. L., & Platt, J. J. (2010). The Core Competency Movement in Marriage and Family Therapy: Key Considerations From Other Disciplines. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00183.xMoreau, K. A. (2017). Has the new Kirkpatrick generation built a better hammer for our evaluation toolbox? Medical Teacher, 39(9), 999-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1337874Morgan, M. M., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2007). TOWARD A COMMON-FACTORS APPROACH TO SUPERVISION. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00001.xMORSE, J. M. (1991). Approaches to Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120-123. https://journals.lww.com/nursingresearchonline/Fulltext/1991/03000/Approaches_to_Qualitative_Quantitative.14.aspxMurphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods. BMJ, 341, c4587.Nelson, T., Chenail, R., Alexander, J., Crane, D., Johnson, S., & Schwallie, L. (2007). The Development of Core Competencies for the Practice of Marriage and Family Therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 417-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00042.xNorthey Jr, W. F., & Gehart, D. R. (2020). The Condensed MFT Core Competencies: A Streamlined Approach for Measuring Student and Supervisee Learning Using the MFT Core Competencies [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12386]. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12386Paris, E., Linville, D., & Rosen, K. (2006). MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST INTERNs` EXPERIENCES OF GROWTH. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01587.xPerlesz, A. J., Stolk, Y., & Firestone, A. F. (1990). Patterns of learning in family therapy training. Fam Process, 29(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1990.00029.xPhillips, K. (2007). Eight tips on developing valid level 1 evaluation forms. Training Today, 8, 14.Pickens, J. C., Morris, N., & Johnson, D. J. (2020). The Digital Divide: Couple and Family Therapy Programs’ Integration of Teletherapy Training and Education [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12417]. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(2), 186-200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12417Polson, M., & Piercy, F. P. (1993). The Impact of Training Stress on Married Family Therapy Trainees and Their Families. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 4(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1300/j085V04N01_05Pulleyblank, E., & Shapiro, R. J. (1986). Evaluation of Family Therapy Trainees: Acquisition of Cognitive and Therapeutic Behavior Skills. Family process, 25(4), 591-598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1986.00591.xRetzlaff, R., von Sydow, K., Beher, S., Haun, M. W., & Schweitzer, J. (2013). The efficacy of systemic therapy for internalizing and other disorders of childhood and adolescence: A systematic review of 38 randomized trials. Family process, 52(4), 619-652.Rhodes, P., Nge, C., Wallis, A., & Hunt, C. (2011). Learning and Living Systemic: Exploring the Personal Effects of Family Therapy Training. Contemporary Family Therapy, 33(4), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-011-9166-2Sexton, T. L., & Datchi, C. (2014). The Development and Evolution of Family Therapy Research: Its Impact on Practice, Current Status, and Future Directions. Family process, 53(3), 415-433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12084Sexton, T. L., Datchi, C., Evans, L., LaFollette, J., & Wright, L. (2013). The effectiveness of couple and family-based clinical interventions. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 6, 587-639.Shah, A., Varghese, M., Udaya Kumar, G. S., Bhatti, R. S., Raguram, A., Sobhana, H., & Srilatha, J. (2000). Brief Family Therapy Training in India. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 11(3), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1300/J085v11n03_04Sieber, S. (1973). The Integration of Fieldwork and Survey Methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1335 - 1359.Sim, T. (2012). The growing pains of family therapy in Singapore. Journal of Family Therapy, 34(2), 204-224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00519.xSim, T., Yi Fang, X., Chan, S., Teik Cheok Loy, J., Sng, S., Lo, R., Chao, W., & Singh, R. (2017). Co-constructing family therapy in the Asian Chinese family diasporas of mainland China, Malaysia, Macau, Singapore and Taiwan. Journal of Family Therapy, 39(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12151SMITH, R. L. (1993). Training in Marriage and Family Counseling and Therapy: Current Status and Challenges. Counselor Education and Supervision, 33(2), 89-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1993.tb00272.xSori, C. F., Wetchler, J. L., Ray, R. E., & Niedner, D. M. (1996). The Impact Of Marriage And Family Therapy Graduate Training Programs On Married Students And Their Families. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 24(3), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189608251038Sprenkle, D. H. (2012). Intervention research in couple and family therapy: A methodological and substantive review and an introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 3-29.Sutton, J. P., Simmons, B., Hammiel, N. M., & Ray, W. A. (2019). Training Therapists in System Logic and Practice. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 38(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2019.38.1.44Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons.Thomas, F. N. (2019). Training Counselors in Couple and Family Therapy. In J. L. Lebow, A. L. Chambers, & D. C. Breunlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy (pp. 2966-2969). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_690Tseng, C.-F., Wittenborn, A. K., Blow, A. J., Chao, W., & Liu, T. (2019). The development of marriage and family therapy in East Asia (China, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong): past, present and future. Journal of Family Therapy, 42(4), 477-498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12285Valenstein-Mah, H., Greer, N., McKenzie, L., Hansen, L., Strom, T. Q., Wiltsey Stirman, S., Wilt, T. J., & Kehle-Forbes, S. M. (2020). Effectiveness of training methods for delivery of evidence-based psychotherapies: a systematic review. Implement Sci, 15(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-00998-wvon Sydow, K., Beher, S., Schweitzer, J., & Retzlaff, R. (2010). The efficacy of systemic therapy with adult patients: A meta‐content analysis of 38 randomized controlled trials. Family process, 49(4), 457-485.von Sydow, K., Retzlaff, R., Beher, S., Haun, M. W., & Schweitzer, J. (2013). The efficacy of systemic therapy for childhood and adolescent externalizing disorders: A systematic review of 47 RCT. Family process, 52(4), 576-618.White, M. B., & Russell, C. S. (1995). THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00137.xWorthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (2nd ed.). NY: Longman.Worthen, B. R. S., J.R. Fitzpatrick, J.L. (1997). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. (2nd ed.)Yardley, S., & Dornan, T. (2012). Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’ [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.x]. Medical Education, 46(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.xZhetpisbayeva, B., Sarzhanova, G., & Seilkhanova, A. (2020). USING THE KIRKPATRICK EVALUATION MODEL FOR PRE-SERVICE TEACHER EDUCATION COURSE. Збірник наукових праць ΛΌГOΣ, 68-73.서진숙. (2010). 가족상담: 가족상담 전문가 교육에 대한 미국의 연구동향 분석: 프로그램 평가를 중심으로. 상담학연구, 11(1), 317-334. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
輔導與諮商碩士學位學程
107172011資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107172011 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 趙文滔<br>修慧蘭 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chao, Wentao<br>Hsiu, Hui-Lain en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 余幸子 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yu, XingZi en_US dc.creator (作者) 余幸子 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Yu, XingZi en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Sep-2023 16:37:18 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Sep-2023 16:37:18 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Sep-2023 16:37:18 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107172011 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147332 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 輔導與諮商碩士學位學程 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107172011 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探究:(1)一項本地家庭治療訓練方案中不同單元對受訓者可能帶來的學習成效;(2)探討有助於學習成效發生的課程設計與執行因素;(3)評估家庭治療訓練方案於結束三個月後,對受訓者個人生活的影響及於工作場域的遷移效果。本研究對象的家庭治療訓練方案歷時8個月,共112小時,研究共招募到10位受訓者接受訪談,包含三位諮商心理師、一位臨床心理師、三位社工師以及兩位學校輔導老師,其工作場域有國中輔導室、大專院校諮商中心、社福機構、醫院。本研究使用質化輔以量化的研究方法,量化部分使用相依樣本t檢定與描述統計,質化資料則蒐集訓練前後受訓者的家庭治療師核心能力量表分數、課後滿意度問卷、學習效果自陳量表;再於訓練方案結束后,以半結構式個別訪談蒐集受訓者經驗,訓練結束後三個月再以焦點團體進行訪談。研究結果摘述如下:一、 受訓者參與家庭治療訓練的動機有訓練前遭遇工作困境、對於家庭治療有興趣、及訓練方案本身有吸引力。二、 量化資料分析顯示,受訓者對於訓練方案各面向滿意度高、學習效果佳、在家庭治療師核心能力量表的整體及四個不同能力模塊的前後测分數差異均達顯著。質化分析結果進一步呈現受訓者接受訓練後在其工作場域確實出現成效。三、 在訓練結束三個月後,受訓者的個人生活改變體現在兩個方面:一為發展出新視角,開始將生活體驗與家庭治療工作連結;另一為受訓者個人關係獲得改善,包含伴侶關係及與原生家庭關係。四、 訓練後受訓者的變化包含四個方面:(1)自我效能感顯著提升,主動與系統合作之意願增強;(2)諮商會談效果提升,工作勝任度提升;(3)受訓者的工作適應狀況提升;(4)團隊成員認同受訓者的專業能力,對受訓者的信任度提高。根據家庭治療師核心能力,本研究探討受訓者在家庭治療師核心能力不同內涵上進步的情況,同時發現心理師及社工師背景對受訓者之學習路徑及成果存在差異。本研究並進一步探討受訓者工作場域因素對學習成效的可能影響,最後根據結論與討論,對未來家庭治療相關訓練及研究提出建議。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a family therapy training program in Taipei. It also explored the curriculum design and execution factors that contributed to learning outcomes, and assessed the impact of the family therapy training program on the trainees` personal lives and clinical outcomes three months post-training.The study focused on an 8-month family therapy training program, totaling 112 hours. Ten trainees were recruited for interviews, including three counseling psychologists, one clinical psychologist, three social workers, and two school guidance counselors. Their workplaces ranged from junior high counseling offices and tertiary education counseling centers to social welfare institutions and hospitals.This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. The quantitative portion utilized paired-sample t-tests and descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were collected from pre- and post-training scores on the Family Therapist Core Competency Scale, post-session satisfaction questionnaires, and self-report learning outcome scales. After the training program concluded, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted to gather trainees` experiences. Three months post-training, focus group interviews were held. Key findings include:1. Trainees` motivations for participating in the family therapy training were challenges faced in their work before the training, interest in family therapy, and the distinctive features of the training program.2. Quantitative data analysis showed high satisfaction across various aspects of the training program, positive learning outcomes, and significant pre- and post-test differences in scores on the overall Family Therapist Core Competency Scale and its four distinct ability modules. Qualitative analysis further revealed an improvement in clinical work outcomes after the training.3. Three months after the training, changes in trainees` personal lives were evident in two aspects: (1) the development of new perspectives, leading them to link their life experiences with family therapy work; (2) improvements in personal relationships, including relationships with partners and families.4. Clinical changes in trainees post-training encompassed: (1) significant enhancement in self-efficacy as therapists and strengthened willingness to work collaboratively; (2) enhanced effectiveness in sessions; (3) improved work adaptability; (4) increased recognition and trust from team members.Based on the core competencies of family therapists, this study examined the progress of trainees across different domains of family therapist core competencies. It also identified differences in learning paths and outcomes for therapists and social workers. The study further explored how the work environment might influence learning outcomes. Drawing from these conclusions and discussions, recommendations for future family therapy-related training and research are provided. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的與研究問題 3第三節 名詞解釋 4第二章 文獻探討 5第一節 家庭治療訓練 5第二節 台灣家庭治療訓練的發展與現狀 14第三節 家庭治療訓練評估的研究 17第四節 訓練成效的評估 22第三章 研究方法 28第一節 研究方法的選擇 28第二節 研究程序 31第三節 研究參與者 34第四節 研究工具 37第五節 資料分析方法 42第六節 研究信賴度檢核 46第七節 研究倫理 47第四章 研究結果 49第一節 量化分析結果 49第二節 質性分析結果 53第三節 促進學習成效之有利因素 108第五章 研究結論及討論 121第一節 研究結論 121第二節 訓練提升受訓者之家庭治療核心能力 124第二節 工作場域因素對受訓者學習成效的影響 134第六章 研究建議及研究限制 137第一節 研究建議 137第二節 研究限制 140參考文獻 141 zh_TW dc.format.extent 4116948 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107172011 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家庭治療 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 訓練 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 核心能力 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家庭治療訓練成效研究 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Family Therapy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Training en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Core Competencies en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Family Therapy Training Outcomes Research en_US dc.title (題名) 家庭治療訓練方案之成效研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Efficacy of a Family Therapy Training Program: An Evaluation Study en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王文科、王智弘(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度,彰化師大教育學報(第29-50頁)。吳惠文、許雅惠(2015)。「家」內鬩牆-兒少安置機構專業人員之專業互動分析,東吳社會工作學報(第25-51頁)。吳靖國(2010)。質性研究:從理解「人」開始,銘傳教育電子期刊(第12冊,第20-34頁)。吳瓊治(2006)。訓練成效的評鑑,品質月刊(第42冊,第44-48頁)。李岳庭(2018)。反思含攝文化下的Bowen理論及其運用在華人文化中,中華輔導與諮商學報(第23-44頁)。林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析,身心障礙研究季刊(第3冊,第122-136頁)。胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論,方法及本土女性研究實例,台北:巨流。許維素、游于萱(2017)。輔導教師之焦點解決督導員訓練成效研究,中華輔導與諮商學報(第147-182頁)。陳秉華、游淑瑜(2001)。台灣的家庭文化與家庭治療,亞洲輔導學報(香港)(第8冊,第153-174頁)。賈紅鶯(1999)。以結構─策略學派的觀點建構一個家族治療的改變歷程,臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文(第1-395頁)。賈紅鶯(2011)。家族治療的文化脈絡與靈性議題:家暴的困境,轉變與反思,中華輔導與諮商學報(第124-149頁)。熊秉荃(2021)。醫療家族治療於臺灣之發展與應用:我的實踐,教育心理學報(第52冊,第665-683頁)。趙文滔(2006)。台灣婚姻與家族治療實務之發展:十一個案例的比較分析,本土心理學研究(第73-103頁)。蔣葦(2022)。成為家庭治療師-三位臺灣家庭治療師的專業發展旅程,國立臺北教育大學心理與諮商學系碩士班碩士論文。鄭夙芬(2005)。焦點團體研究法的理論與應用,選舉研究(第12冊,第211-239頁)。Anderson, S. A. (1992). EVALUATION OF AN ACADEMIC FAMILY THERAPY TRAINING PROGRAM: CHANGES IN TRAINEES`RELATIONSHIP AND INTERVENTION SKILLS. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18(4), 365-376.Asiimwe, R., Lesch, E., Karume, M., & Blow, A. J. Expanding our international reach: Trends in the development of systemic family therapy training and implementation in Africa. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12514Avis, J., & Sprenkle, D. (2007). Outcome research on family therapy training: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1990.tb00846.xAvis, J. M., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1990). OUTCOME RESEARCH ON FAMILY THERAPY TRAINING: A SUBSTANTIVE AND METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW2. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16(3), 241-264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1990.tb00846.xBaer, J. S., Wells, E. A., Rosengren, D. B., Hartzler, B., Beadnell, B., & Dunn, C. (2009). Agency context and tailored training in technology transfer: a pilot evaluation of motivational interviewing training for community counselors. J Subst Abuse Treat, 37(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2009.01.003Beidas, R. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2010). Training Therapists in Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Review of Studies From a Systems-Contextual Perspective. Clin Psychol (New York), 17(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01187.xBreitmayer, B. J., Ayres, L., & Knafl, K. A. (1993). Triangulation in qualitative research: evaluation of completeness and confirmation purposes. Image J Nurs Sch, 25(3), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00788.xBreunlin, D. C., Schwartz, R. C., Krause, M. S., & Selby, L. M. (1983). Evaluating family therapy training: The development of an instrument. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01482.xByington, K., Fischer, J., Walker, L., & Freedman, E. (1997). Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Multicultural Counseling Ethics and Assessment Training. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 28, 15 - 19.Chao, W., & Huang, W. (2013a). The Development of Family Therapy Practice and Training in Taiwan: A Review and Prospects for the Future. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9261-7Chao, W., & Huang, W. (2013b). The Development of Family Therapy Practice and Training in Taiwan: A Review and Prospects for the Future. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35(2), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9261-7Chao, W., & Lou, Y. C. (2018). Construction of core competencies for family therapists in Taiwan. Journal of Family Therapy, 40(2), 265-286.Cleghorn, J. M., & Levin, S. (1973). Training family therapists by setting learning objectives. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 43(3), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1973.tb00815.xCordes, M. L. (2014). A transcendental phenomenological study of developmental math students` experiences and perceptions. Liberty University.Crane, D. R., & Christenson, J. D. (2012). A Summary Report of the Cost-Effectiveness of the Profession and Practice of Marriage and Family Therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34(2), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9187-5Cunanan, E. D., & McCollum, E. E. (2006). What Works When Learning Solution-Focused Brief Therapy. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 17(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J085v17n01_04D`Aniello, C., & Fife, S. T. (2020). A 20-Year Review of Common Factors Research in Marriage and Family Therapy: A Mixed Methods Content Analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(4), 701-718. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12427D’Aniello, C., & Hertlein, K. M. (2017). Integrating Gatekeeping Practices into Core Competencies in MFT Training: Development of the Core Competency-Based Assessment Measure. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(3), 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9416-zDeacon, S. A., & Piercy, F. P. (2000). Qualitative evaluation of family therapy programs: a participatory approach. J Marital Fam Ther, 26(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00274.xDeCaporale-Ryan, L. N., Dadiz, R., & Peyre, S. E. (2016). Simulation-based learning: From theory to practice. Families, Systems, & Health, 34, 159-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000203Deng, L., Lin, X., Lan, J., & Fang, X. (2013). Family Therapy in China. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9273-3Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (2011). Therapist competence, therapy quality, and therapist training. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(6), 373-378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.005Falicov, C., Constantine, J., & Breunlin, D. (1981). Teaching Family Therapy: A Program Based on Training Objectives. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1981.tb01405.xFife, S. T., D`Aniello, C., Scott, S., & Sullivan, E. (2019). Marriage and Family Therapy Students’ Experience with Common Factors Training. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12333Fragkiadaki, E., Triliva, S., Balamoutsou, S., & Prokopiou, A. (2013). The path towards a professional identity: An IPA study of Greek family therapy trainees. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13(4), 290-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2013.768287Gehart, D. (2011). The core competencies and MFT education: Practical aspects of transitioning to a learning-centered, outcome-based pedagogy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(3), 344-354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00205.xGivropoulou, D., & Tseliou, E. (2018). Moving Between Dialogic Reflexive Processes In Systemic Family Therapy Training: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study of Trainees’ Experience. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12237Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family therapy : an overview (4th ed.). Wadsworth Thomson.Greene, J., & McClintock, C. (1985). Triangulation in Evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9, 523 - 545.Hales, D. (2010). An Introduction to Triangulation. UNAIDS. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/sub_landing/files/10_4-Intro-to-triangulation-MEF.pdfHeath, A. W., McKenna, B. C., & Atkinson, B. J. (1988). TOWARD THE IDENTIFICATION OF VARIABLES FOR EVALUATING FAMILY THERAPY WORKSHOPS*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1988.tb00746.xHelge Rønnestad, M., & Ladany, N. (2006). The impact of psychotherapy training: Introduction to the special section. Psychotherapy Research, 16(3), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300600612241Herschell, A. D., Kolko, D. J., Baumann, B. L., & Davis, A. C. (2010). The role of therapist training in the implementation of psychosocial treatments: a review and critique with recommendations. Clin Psychol Rev, 30(4), 448-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.005Hodgson, J. L., Johnson, L. N., Ketring, S. A., Wampler, R. S., & Lamson, A. L. (2005). INTEGRATING RESEARCH AND CLINICAL TRAINING IN MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY TRAINING PROGRAMS. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01544.xHogan, R. L. (2007). The historical development of program evaluation: Exploring past and present. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, 2(4), 5.Imber-Black, E. (2014). Eschewing certainties: the creation of family therapists in the 21st century. Fam Process, 53(3), 371-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12091JD, K. D. K. (2009). Implementing the four levels: A practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs: Easyread super large 24pt edition. ReadHowYouWant. com.Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative science quarterly, 24(4), 602-611.Karam, E. A., Blow, A. J., Sprenkle, D. H., & Davis, S. D. (2015). Strengthening the Systemic Ties that Bind: Integrating Common Factors into Marriage and Family Therapy Curricula [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12096]. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(2), 136-149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12096Karimi, H., Piercy, F., & Savla, J. (2019). A Chronological Map of Common Factors across Three Stages of Marriage and Family Therapy. In. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85357Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2005). Transferring learning to behavior: Using the four levels to improve performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Great Ideas Revisited. Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs. Revisiting Kirkpatrick`s Four-Level Model. Training and Development, 50, 54-59.Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2007). Implementing the Four Levels: A Practical Guide for Effective Evaluation of Training Programs. 94.Kniskern, D. P., & Gurman, A. S. (1979). Research on Training in Marriage and Family Therapy: Status, Issues, and Directions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 5(3), 83-94.Lal, A., & Jonathan, N. (2023). Marriage and Family Therapy Education and Training: The Development of a Competency-Based Model. Contemporary Family Therapy, 45(2), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-021-09600-xLambert-Shute, J. J., Nguyen, H. N., Peterson, P. W., & Pirasteh, A. B. (2019). Reflecting on the Past: A Content Analysis of Family Therapy Research from 2000-2015. J Marital Fam Ther, 45(2), 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12334LEBOW, J. (1997). The Integrative Revolution in Couple and Family Therapy. Family process, 36(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1997.00001.xLee, I., Robert E., & Nichols, W. C. (2010). The Doctoral Education of Professional Marriage and Family Therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(3), 259-269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00158.xLee, R. E., Nichols, D. P., Nichols, W. C., & Odom, T. (2004). TRENDS IN FAMILY THERAPY SUPERVISION: THE PAST 25 YEARS AND INTO THE FUTURE. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01222.xLiao, S.-C., & Hsu, S.-Y. (2019). Evaluating A Continuing Medical Education Program: New World Kirkpatrick Model Approach. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 8. https://doi.org/10.32327/IJMESS/8.4.2019.17Liddle, H., & Halpin, R. (2007). Family Therapy Training and Supervision Literature: A Comparative Review*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 4, 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1978.tb00543.xLiddle, H. A. (1991). Training and supervision in family therapy: A comprehensive and critical analysis. In Handbook of family therapy, Vol. 2. (pp. 638-697). Brunner/Mazel.Liddle, H. A. (2016). Multidimensional Family Therapy: Evidence Base for Transdiagnostic Treatment Outcomes, Change Mechanisms, and Implementation in Community Settings. Family process, 55(3), 558-576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12243Liddle, H. A., & Halpin, R. J. (1978). Family Therapy Training and Supervision Literature: A Comparative Review*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 4(4), 77-98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1978.tb00543.xLiddle, H. A., Rowe, C. L., Gonzalez, A., Henderson, C. E., Dakof, G. A., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2006). Changing provider practices, program environment, and improving outcomes by transporting multidimensional family therapy to an adolescent drug treatment setting. Am J Addict, 15 Suppl 1, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550490601003698Liddle, H. A., & Saba, G. W. (1982). TEACHING FAMILY THERAPY AT THE INTRODUCTORY LEVEL: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL EMPHASIZING A PATTERN WHICH CONNECTS TRAINING AND THERAPY*. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1982.tb01422.xMiles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.Miller, J. K., Todahl, J. L., & Platt, J. J. (2010). The Core Competency Movement in Marriage and Family Therapy: Key Considerations From Other Disciplines. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00183.xMoreau, K. A. (2017). Has the new Kirkpatrick generation built a better hammer for our evaluation toolbox? Medical Teacher, 39(9), 999-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1337874Morgan, M. M., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2007). TOWARD A COMMON-FACTORS APPROACH TO SUPERVISION. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00001.xMORSE, J. M. (1991). Approaches to Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120-123. https://journals.lww.com/nursingresearchonline/Fulltext/1991/03000/Approaches_to_Qualitative_Quantitative.14.aspxMurphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods. BMJ, 341, c4587.Nelson, T., Chenail, R., Alexander, J., Crane, D., Johnson, S., & Schwallie, L. (2007). The Development of Core Competencies for the Practice of Marriage and Family Therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 417-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00042.xNorthey Jr, W. F., & Gehart, D. R. (2020). The Condensed MFT Core Competencies: A Streamlined Approach for Measuring Student and Supervisee Learning Using the MFT Core Competencies [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12386]. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(1), 42-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12386Paris, E., Linville, D., & Rosen, K. (2006). MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST INTERNs` EXPERIENCES OF GROWTH. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01587.xPerlesz, A. J., Stolk, Y., & Firestone, A. F. (1990). Patterns of learning in family therapy training. Fam Process, 29(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1990.00029.xPhillips, K. (2007). Eight tips on developing valid level 1 evaluation forms. Training Today, 8, 14.Pickens, J. C., Morris, N., & Johnson, D. J. (2020). The Digital Divide: Couple and Family Therapy Programs’ Integration of Teletherapy Training and Education [https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12417]. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(2), 186-200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12417Polson, M., & Piercy, F. P. (1993). The Impact of Training Stress on Married Family Therapy Trainees and Their Families. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 4(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1300/j085V04N01_05Pulleyblank, E., & Shapiro, R. J. (1986). Evaluation of Family Therapy Trainees: Acquisition of Cognitive and Therapeutic Behavior Skills. Family process, 25(4), 591-598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1986.00591.xRetzlaff, R., von Sydow, K., Beher, S., Haun, M. W., & Schweitzer, J. (2013). The efficacy of systemic therapy for internalizing and other disorders of childhood and adolescence: A systematic review of 38 randomized trials. Family process, 52(4), 619-652.Rhodes, P., Nge, C., Wallis, A., & Hunt, C. (2011). Learning and Living Systemic: Exploring the Personal Effects of Family Therapy Training. Contemporary Family Therapy, 33(4), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-011-9166-2Sexton, T. L., & Datchi, C. (2014). The Development and Evolution of Family Therapy Research: Its Impact on Practice, Current Status, and Future Directions. Family process, 53(3), 415-433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12084Sexton, T. L., Datchi, C., Evans, L., LaFollette, J., & Wright, L. (2013). The effectiveness of couple and family-based clinical interventions. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 6, 587-639.Shah, A., Varghese, M., Udaya Kumar, G. S., Bhatti, R. S., Raguram, A., Sobhana, H., & Srilatha, J. (2000). Brief Family Therapy Training in India. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 11(3), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1300/J085v11n03_04Sieber, S. (1973). The Integration of Fieldwork and Survey Methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1335 - 1359.Sim, T. (2012). The growing pains of family therapy in Singapore. Journal of Family Therapy, 34(2), 204-224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00519.xSim, T., Yi Fang, X., Chan, S., Teik Cheok Loy, J., Sng, S., Lo, R., Chao, W., & Singh, R. (2017). Co-constructing family therapy in the Asian Chinese family diasporas of mainland China, Malaysia, Macau, Singapore and Taiwan. Journal of Family Therapy, 39(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12151SMITH, R. L. (1993). Training in Marriage and Family Counseling and Therapy: Current Status and Challenges. Counselor Education and Supervision, 33(2), 89-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1993.tb00272.xSori, C. F., Wetchler, J. L., Ray, R. E., & Niedner, D. M. (1996). The Impact Of Marriage And Family Therapy Graduate Training Programs On Married Students And Their Families. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 24(3), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189608251038Sprenkle, D. H. (2012). Intervention research in couple and family therapy: A methodological and substantive review and an introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 3-29.Sutton, J. P., Simmons, B., Hammiel, N. M., & Ray, W. A. (2019). Training Therapists in System Logic and Practice. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 38(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2019.38.1.44Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons.Thomas, F. N. (2019). Training Counselors in Couple and Family Therapy. In J. L. Lebow, A. L. Chambers, & D. C. Breunlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy (pp. 2966-2969). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_690Tseng, C.-F., Wittenborn, A. K., Blow, A. J., Chao, W., & Liu, T. (2019). The development of marriage and family therapy in East Asia (China, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong): past, present and future. Journal of Family Therapy, 42(4), 477-498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12285Valenstein-Mah, H., Greer, N., McKenzie, L., Hansen, L., Strom, T. Q., Wiltsey Stirman, S., Wilt, T. J., & Kehle-Forbes, S. M. (2020). Effectiveness of training methods for delivery of evidence-based psychotherapies: a systematic review. Implement Sci, 15(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-00998-wvon Sydow, K., Beher, S., Schweitzer, J., & Retzlaff, R. (2010). The efficacy of systemic therapy with adult patients: A meta‐content analysis of 38 randomized controlled trials. Family process, 49(4), 457-485.von Sydow, K., Retzlaff, R., Beher, S., Haun, M. W., & Schweitzer, J. (2013). The efficacy of systemic therapy for childhood and adolescent externalizing disorders: A systematic review of 47 RCT. Family process, 52(4), 576-618.White, M. B., & Russell, C. S. (1995). THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00137.xWorthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (2nd ed.). NY: Longman.Worthen, B. R. S., J.R. Fitzpatrick, J.L. (1997). Educational Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. (2nd ed.)Yardley, S., & Dornan, T. (2012). Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’ [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.x]. Medical Education, 46(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.xZhetpisbayeva, B., Sarzhanova, G., & Seilkhanova, A. (2020). USING THE KIRKPATRICK EVALUATION MODEL FOR PRE-SERVICE TEACHER EDUCATION COURSE. Збірник наукових праць ΛΌГOΣ, 68-73.서진숙. (2010). 가족상담: 가족상담 전문가 교육에 대한 미국의 연구동향 분석: 프로그램 평가를 중심으로. 상담학연구, 11(1), 317-334. zh_TW