學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 日間照顧中心對周邊房屋價格之影響─以臺北市為例
The Impact of Daycare Centers on Surrounding Housing Prices: A Case Study of Taipei作者 鄭婷瑜
Cheng, Ting-Yu貢獻者 吳文傑
鄭婷瑜
Cheng, Ting-Yu關鍵詞 一學區一長照
日間照顧中心
房價
特徵價格法
Daycare Centers
Housing Prices
Hedonic Price Method日期 2023 上傳時間 3-Oct-2023 10:42:32 (UTC+8) 摘要 臺灣預計於2025年步入超高齡化社會，隨著高齡人口快速的增長，長期照顧需求人數增加，政府提出長照2.0計畫，其中以「一學區一長照」作為政策口號之一，建立以社區為基礎之照顧型社區，而本文欲探究房價與此類日間照顧中心之間的關係。過去長照機構常被認定為鄰避設施，但隨著近年對長期照顧的需求提升，本文推測日照中心對房價可能產生正負兩種效果，一為近年來對日照中心需求上升使得房價上升之正向效果，一為因鄰避效果產生之負向效果，本文將研究正向與負向產生之淨效果，並將納入距離遠近解釋。本文使用2022年7至8月內政部不動產實價登錄價格資料，利用特徵價格法結合最小平方法，同時搭配地理資訊系統作為測量距離的工具進行實證分析。研究結果發現當房屋位於有日照中心的學區相較於位於無日照中心的學區有較高的房屋價格，且房屋若位於有日照中心之學區，距日照中心之距離增加，會使房屋價格下降，代表日照中心對附近房價會產生正向影響，故得出日間照顧中心對房價之正向效果會大於負向效果。
Taiwan is expected to enter super-aged society in 2025. With the rapid growth of the elderly population, the demand for long-term care has increased. The government hasproposed the Long-Term Care 2.0, in which "One School District, One Long-term Care Services" is one of the policy slogans, aiming to establish community-based care communities. This study aims to explore the relationship between housing prices and daycare centers.In the past, long-term care facilities were commonly regarded as facilities to be avoided in the neighborhood. However, with the increasing demand for long-term care in recent years, this article postulates that daycare centers may have both positive and negative effects on housing prices. On the one hand, the increasing demand for daycare centers may lead to a positive effect on housing prices. On the other hand, negative effects may arise due to the " NIMBY effect." This study aims to determine which effect is greater, and further incorporate the explanation of distance. The study uses real estate transaction data from the Ministry of the Interior from July to August in 2022, and applies the hedonic price method combined with the ordinary least square method(OLS). Geographic information systems are also used as a tool to measure distance for empirical analysis. The results show that houses located in districts with daycare centers have higher prices compared to those without day care centers. Furthermore, as the distance from the daycare center increases within the district, housing prices decrease. This indicates that daycare centers have a positive impact on nearby housing prices. Therefore, it can be concluded that the positive effect of daycare centers on housing prices is greater than the negative effect.參考文獻 中文文獻：毛麗琴. (2009). 影響房價變動因素之探討－以高雄市區爲例.商業現代化學刊, 5(2), 141-156.江穎慧、莊喻婷、張金鶚. (2017). 臺北市公共自行車場站對鄰近住宅價格之影響. 運輸計劃季刊, 46(4), 399-428.吳欣蓉. (2017). 都會區大眾捷運路網對於鄰近房價之影響-以桃園機場捷運、臺中捷運綠線為例 國立中央大學].李永展、林啟賢、陳柏廷. (1997). 台北市鄰避型公共設施更新之研究.李泓見、張金鶚、花敬群. (2006). 台北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究. 臺灣土地研究, 9(1), 63-87.李泳龍、黃宗誠、戴政安、李善將. (2009). 醫學中心對鄰近住宅環境影響之研究.建築與規劃學報, 10(2), 75-93.李春長、游淑滿、張維倫. (2012). 公共設施、環境品質與不動產景氣對住宅價格影響之研究─兼論不動產景氣之調節效果. 住宅學報, 21(1), 67-87.林左裕、陳慧潔、蔡永利. (2010). 影響住宅大樓價格因素之探討. 評價學報(3), 13-23.林忠樑、林佳慧. (2014). 學校特徵與空間距離對周邊房價之影響分析－以台北市為例. 經濟論文叢刊, 42(2), 215-271.林祖嘉、林素菁. (1993). 台灣地區環境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析.住宅學報(1), 21-45.林祖嘉、馬毓駿. (2007). 特徵方程式大量估價法在台灣不動產市場之應用. 住宅學報, 16(2), 1-22.林素菁. (2004). 台北市國中小明星學區邊際願意支付之估計. 住宅學報, 13(1), 15-34.林崇詠. (2015). 影響房地產價格因素之研究:以臺中市西屯區為例 朝陽科技大學]. 台中市.林雅瑩. (2010). 大廈住宅樓層別效用比之估算-兼論屋齡對於樓層別效用比之影響 國立臺北大學]. 新北市.洪得洋、林祖嘉. (1999). 臺北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究. 住宅學報(8), 47-67.紀凱笙. (2020). 長照設施對其周邊房地產交易價格影響之研究-以臺北市為例 國立臺北科技大學]. 台北市.張莉君. (2016). 迎毗設施及鄰避設施對房屋價格影響之研究–以新北市板橋區及新莊區為例 國立中央大學]. 桃園縣.張開元. (2020). 半嫌惡設施對房價的非線性影響— 以台北市消防單位為例 國立政治大學].陳廷軒. (2017). 老人福利機構之嫌惡性與影響初探—以臺南市為例 國立成功大學]. 台南市.陳柏宗、蘇玲玉、王雅婷. (2018). 活化閒置空間為高齡者日間照顧據點推動策略之研究－以社區活動中心為例. 建築學報(106_S), 49-67.陳晏筑、林雅亭、劉千菱、吳佳洟、張雅嵐、林左裕. (2022). 鄰避設施對鄰近房價的影響－以臺北市為例. 土地問題研究季刊, 21(4), 32-53.彭柏欽. (2020). 豪宅房價影響因素分析—以臺北市大安區為例 國立政治大學].彭宴玲. (2005). 台北市綠地效益之評價－特徵價格法之應用.黃琦淵. (2016). 高雄市公園綠地空間對房價影響之研究 國立屏東大學]. 屏東楊宗憲、蘇倖慧. (2011). 迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究. 住宅學報, 20(2), 61-80.葉紫光. (2018). 影響房價因素之研究 -不動產估價技術規則的觀點 輔仁大學]. 新北市.鄒富美. (2022). 長照機構經營決策之關鍵因素分析 中華大學]. 新竹市.廖仲仁. (1994). 機場噪音對住宅價格之影響：以臺北松山機場附近住宅為例 國立臺灣大學]. 台北市.蔡育政. (2009). 影響房地產價格因素之研究:以台中市北屯區、西屯區、南屯區、中區、東區為例 朝陽科技大學]. 台中市.蔡幸芳. (2016). 房屋本身特徵及區域外部環境對房屋價格的影響 東吳大學]. 台北市.衛生福利部. (2016). 長期照顧十年計畫2.0.衛生福利部. (2018). 2017年老人狀況調查報告.鄭佳玲. (2010). 老人養護機構鄰避效應與社區關係經營-以台北市為例 東吳大學]. 台北市.薛明演. (2019). 國小學校校園閒置空間作為高齡者社區照顧據點可行性分析 國立暨南國際大學]. 南投縣. 英文文獻：Aroul, R. R., & Rodriguez, M. (2017). The Increasing Value of Green for Residential Real Estate. The Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 9, 112-130.Baltes, M., Maas, I., Wilms, H.-U., Borchelt, M., & Little, T. (1999). Everyday Competence in Old and Very Old Age: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings. In (pp. 384-402).Black, S. E. (1999). Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577-599.Bloem, B., van Tilburg, T., & Thomése, F. (2008). Residential Mobility in Older Dutch Adults : Influence of Later Life Events. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 3.Carroll, T. M., Clauretie, M., & Clauretie, T. M. (1999). Transitory Effects of Disamenities on Residential Housing Values: The Case of Public and Senior Housing. The Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 5(3), 287-297.Colwell, P. F., Dehring, C. A., & Lash, N. A. (2000). The effect of group homes on neighborhood property values [Article]. Land Economics, 76(4), 615-637.Das, S., Mitra, A., & Kumar, R. (2017). Do neighbourhood facilities matter for slum housing? Evidence from Indian slum clusters. Urban Studies, 54(8), 1887-1904.Espey, M., & Lopez, H. (2000). The Impact of Airport Noise and Proximity on Residential Property Values. Growth and Change, 31(3), 408-419.Follain, J. R., & Malpezzi, S. (1981). Another Look at Racial Differences in Housing Prices. Urban Studies, 18(2), 195-203.Geoghegan, J. (2002). The value of open spaces in residential land use [Article]. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 91-98, Article Pii s0264-8377(01)00040-0.Huang, P. (2018). Impact of distance to school on housing price: Evidence from a quantile regression. The Empirical Economics Letters, 17(2), 149-156.Huh, S., & Kwak, S.-J. (1997). The Choice of Functional Form and Variables in the Hedonic Price Model in Seoul. Urban Studies, 34(7), 989-998.Kim, H., Park, S. W., Lee, S., & Xue, X. (2015). Determinants of house prices in Seoul: A quantile regression approach. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 21(2), 91-113.Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157.Levesque, T. J. (1994). Modelling the Effects of Airport Noise on Residential Housing Markets: A Case Study of Winnipeg International Airport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 28(2), 199-210.Machin, S. (2011). Houses and schools: Valuation of school quality through the housing market [Article]. Labour Economics, 18(6), 723-729.McElveen, M. A., Brown, B. E., & Gibbons, C. M. (2017). Natural Gas Pipelines and the Value of Nearby HomesA Spatial Analysis. Journal of Housing Research, 26(1), 27-38.Metz, N. (2015). Effect of Distance to Schooling on Home Prices. Review of Regional Studies, 45, 151-171.O`hare, M. (1977). " Not On My Block You Don`t"-Facilities Siting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation.Oates, W. E. (1969). The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, 77(6), 957-971.Plastria, F., Gordillo, J., & Carrizosa, E. (2013). Locating a semi-obnoxious covering facility with repelling polygonal regions. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 161(16), 2604-2623.Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34-55.Sirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A., & Zietz, E. N. (2005). The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1), 3-43.Sung, M., & Ki, J. (2021). Effects of Educational and Cultural Facilities on Housing Prices in Seoul from an Accessibility Perspective. Journal of People Plants and Environment, 24, 529-544.Takahashi, L. M., & Dear, M. J. (1997). The Changing Dynamics of Community Opposition to Human Service Facilities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 79-93.Tita, G. E., Petras, T. L., & Greenbaum, R. T. (2006). Crime and residential choice: A neighborhood level analysis of the impact of crime on housing prices [Article]. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(4), 299-317.Wen, H. Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). Do educational facilities affect housing price? An empirical study in Hangzhou, China [Article]. Habitat International, 42, 155-163.Yang, L. C., Wang, B., Zhou, J. P., & Wang, X. (2018). Walking accessibility and property prices [Article]. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 62, 551-562.Zahirovic-Herbert, V., & Gibler, K. M. (2020). Neighbouring house transaction response to assisted living facilities and nursing homes. Housing Studies, 35(2), 195-213. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
110255012資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110255012 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 吳文傑 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鄭婷瑜 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Cheng, Ting-Yu en_US dc.creator (作者) 鄭婷瑜 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Cheng, Ting-Yu en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-Oct-2023 10:42:32 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-Oct-2023 10:42:32 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Oct-2023 10:42:32 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0110255012 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147728 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 財政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 110255012 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 臺灣預計於2025年步入超高齡化社會，隨著高齡人口快速的增長，長期照顧需求人數增加，政府提出長照2.0計畫，其中以「一學區一長照」作為政策口號之一，建立以社區為基礎之照顧型社區，而本文欲探究房價與此類日間照顧中心之間的關係。過去長照機構常被認定為鄰避設施，但隨著近年對長期照顧的需求提升，本文推測日照中心對房價可能產生正負兩種效果，一為近年來對日照中心需求上升使得房價上升之正向效果，一為因鄰避效果產生之負向效果，本文將研究正向與負向產生之淨效果，並將納入距離遠近解釋。本文使用2022年7至8月內政部不動產實價登錄價格資料，利用特徵價格法結合最小平方法，同時搭配地理資訊系統作為測量距離的工具進行實證分析。研究結果發現當房屋位於有日照中心的學區相較於位於無日照中心的學區有較高的房屋價格，且房屋若位於有日照中心之學區，距日照中心之距離增加，會使房屋價格下降，代表日照中心對附近房價會產生正向影響，故得出日間照顧中心對房價之正向效果會大於負向效果。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Taiwan is expected to enter super-aged society in 2025. With the rapid growth of the elderly population, the demand for long-term care has increased. The government hasproposed the Long-Term Care 2.0, in which "One School District, One Long-term Care Services" is one of the policy slogans, aiming to establish community-based care communities. This study aims to explore the relationship between housing prices and daycare centers.In the past, long-term care facilities were commonly regarded as facilities to be avoided in the neighborhood. However, with the increasing demand for long-term care in recent years, this article postulates that daycare centers may have both positive and negative effects on housing prices. On the one hand, the increasing demand for daycare centers may lead to a positive effect on housing prices. On the other hand, negative effects may arise due to the " NIMBY effect." This study aims to determine which effect is greater, and further incorporate the explanation of distance. The study uses real estate transaction data from the Ministry of the Interior from July to August in 2022, and applies the hedonic price method combined with the ordinary least square method(OLS). Geographic information systems are also used as a tool to measure distance for empirical analysis. The results show that houses located in districts with daycare centers have higher prices compared to those without day care centers. Furthermore, as the distance from the daycare center increases within the district, housing prices decrease. This indicates that daycare centers have a positive impact on nearby housing prices. Therefore, it can be concluded that the positive effect of daycare centers on housing prices is greater than the negative effect. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景 1第二節 研究動機及研究目的 3第三節 研究方法 4第四節 研究範圍及研究限制 4第五節 研究架構與流程 6第二章 文獻回顧 8第一節 長照機構與房價 8第二節 鄰避設施、迎毗設施、半嫌惡設施 12第三節 其他影響房屋價格之因素 17第三章 研究方法 25第一節 假說建立 25第二節 模型設定 26第三節 變數選擇與預期符號 30第四節 資料來源與樣本 35第四章 敘述統計 38第五章 實證分析 46第一節 相關係數檢定 46第二節 迴歸實證結果 49第六章 結論與建議 59參考文獻 62 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2976939 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110255012 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 一學區一長照 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 日間照顧中心 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 房價 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 特徵價格法 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Daycare Centers en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Housing Prices en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hedonic Price Method en_US dc.title (題名) 日間照顧中心對周邊房屋價格之影響─以臺北市為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Impact of Daycare Centers on Surrounding Housing Prices: A Case Study of Taipei en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻：毛麗琴. (2009). 影響房價變動因素之探討－以高雄市區爲例.商業現代化學刊, 5(2), 141-156.江穎慧、莊喻婷、張金鶚. (2017). 臺北市公共自行車場站對鄰近住宅價格之影響. 運輸計劃季刊, 46(4), 399-428.吳欣蓉. (2017). 都會區大眾捷運路網對於鄰近房價之影響-以桃園機場捷運、臺中捷運綠線為例 國立中央大學].李永展、林啟賢、陳柏廷. (1997). 台北市鄰避型公共設施更新之研究.李泓見、張金鶚、花敬群. (2006). 台北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究. 臺灣土地研究, 9(1), 63-87.李泳龍、黃宗誠、戴政安、李善將. (2009). 醫學中心對鄰近住宅環境影響之研究.建築與規劃學報, 10(2), 75-93.李春長、游淑滿、張維倫. (2012). 公共設施、環境品質與不動產景氣對住宅價格影響之研究─兼論不動產景氣之調節效果. 住宅學報, 21(1), 67-87.林左裕、陳慧潔、蔡永利. (2010). 影響住宅大樓價格因素之探討. 評價學報(3), 13-23.林忠樑、林佳慧. (2014). 學校特徵與空間距離對周邊房價之影響分析－以台北市為例. 經濟論文叢刊, 42(2), 215-271.林祖嘉、林素菁. (1993). 台灣地區環境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析.住宅學報(1), 21-45.林祖嘉、馬毓駿. (2007). 特徵方程式大量估價法在台灣不動產市場之應用. 住宅學報, 16(2), 1-22.林素菁. (2004). 台北市國中小明星學區邊際願意支付之估計. 住宅學報, 13(1), 15-34.林崇詠. (2015). 影響房地產價格因素之研究:以臺中市西屯區為例 朝陽科技大學]. 台中市.林雅瑩. (2010). 大廈住宅樓層別效用比之估算-兼論屋齡對於樓層別效用比之影響 國立臺北大學]. 新北市.洪得洋、林祖嘉. (1999). 臺北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究. 住宅學報(8), 47-67.紀凱笙. (2020). 長照設施對其周邊房地產交易價格影響之研究-以臺北市為例 國立臺北科技大學]. 台北市.張莉君. (2016). 迎毗設施及鄰避設施對房屋價格影響之研究–以新北市板橋區及新莊區為例 國立中央大學]. 桃園縣.張開元. (2020). 半嫌惡設施對房價的非線性影響— 以台北市消防單位為例 國立政治大學].陳廷軒. (2017). 老人福利機構之嫌惡性與影響初探—以臺南市為例 國立成功大學]. 台南市.陳柏宗、蘇玲玉、王雅婷. (2018). 活化閒置空間為高齡者日間照顧據點推動策略之研究－以社區活動中心為例. 建築學報(106_S), 49-67.陳晏筑、林雅亭、劉千菱、吳佳洟、張雅嵐、林左裕. (2022). 鄰避設施對鄰近房價的影響－以臺北市為例. 土地問題研究季刊, 21(4), 32-53.彭柏欽. (2020). 豪宅房價影響因素分析—以臺北市大安區為例 國立政治大學].彭宴玲. (2005). 台北市綠地效益之評價－特徵價格法之應用.黃琦淵. (2016). 高雄市公園綠地空間對房價影響之研究 國立屏東大學]. 屏東楊宗憲、蘇倖慧. (2011). 迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究. 住宅學報, 20(2), 61-80.葉紫光. (2018). 影響房價因素之研究 -不動產估價技術規則的觀點 輔仁大學]. 新北市.鄒富美. (2022). 長照機構經營決策之關鍵因素分析 中華大學]. 新竹市.廖仲仁. (1994). 機場噪音對住宅價格之影響：以臺北松山機場附近住宅為例 國立臺灣大學]. 台北市.蔡育政. (2009). 影響房地產價格因素之研究:以台中市北屯區、西屯區、南屯區、中區、東區為例 朝陽科技大學]. 台中市.蔡幸芳. (2016). 房屋本身特徵及區域外部環境對房屋價格的影響 東吳大學]. 台北市.衛生福利部. (2016). 長期照顧十年計畫2.0.衛生福利部. (2018). 2017年老人狀況調查報告.鄭佳玲. (2010). 老人養護機構鄰避效應與社區關係經營-以台北市為例 東吳大學]. 台北市.薛明演. (2019). 國小學校校園閒置空間作為高齡者社區照顧據點可行性分析 國立暨南國際大學]. 南投縣. 英文文獻：Aroul, R. R., & Rodriguez, M. (2017). The Increasing Value of Green for Residential Real Estate. The Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 9, 112-130.Baltes, M., Maas, I., Wilms, H.-U., Borchelt, M., & Little, T. (1999). Everyday Competence in Old and Very Old Age: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings. In (pp. 384-402).Black, S. E. (1999). Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577-599.Bloem, B., van Tilburg, T., & Thomése, F. (2008). Residential Mobility in Older Dutch Adults : Influence of Later Life Events. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 3.Carroll, T. M., Clauretie, M., & Clauretie, T. M. (1999). Transitory Effects of Disamenities on Residential Housing Values: The Case of Public and Senior Housing. The Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 5(3), 287-297.Colwell, P. F., Dehring, C. A., & Lash, N. A. (2000). The effect of group homes on neighborhood property values [Article]. Land Economics, 76(4), 615-637.Das, S., Mitra, A., & Kumar, R. (2017). Do neighbourhood facilities matter for slum housing? Evidence from Indian slum clusters. Urban Studies, 54(8), 1887-1904.Espey, M., & Lopez, H. (2000). The Impact of Airport Noise and Proximity on Residential Property Values. Growth and Change, 31(3), 408-419.Follain, J. R., & Malpezzi, S. (1981). Another Look at Racial Differences in Housing Prices. Urban Studies, 18(2), 195-203.Geoghegan, J. (2002). The value of open spaces in residential land use [Article]. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 91-98, Article Pii s0264-8377(01)00040-0.Huang, P. (2018). Impact of distance to school on housing price: Evidence from a quantile regression. The Empirical Economics Letters, 17(2), 149-156.Huh, S., & Kwak, S.-J. (1997). The Choice of Functional Form and Variables in the Hedonic Price Model in Seoul. Urban Studies, 34(7), 989-998.Kim, H., Park, S. W., Lee, S., & Xue, X. (2015). Determinants of house prices in Seoul: A quantile regression approach. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 21(2), 91-113.Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157.Levesque, T. J. (1994). Modelling the Effects of Airport Noise on Residential Housing Markets: A Case Study of Winnipeg International Airport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 28(2), 199-210.Machin, S. (2011). Houses and schools: Valuation of school quality through the housing market [Article]. Labour Economics, 18(6), 723-729.McElveen, M. A., Brown, B. E., & Gibbons, C. M. (2017). Natural Gas Pipelines and the Value of Nearby HomesA Spatial Analysis. Journal of Housing Research, 26(1), 27-38.Metz, N. (2015). Effect of Distance to Schooling on Home Prices. Review of Regional Studies, 45, 151-171.O`hare, M. (1977). " Not On My Block You Don`t"-Facilities Siting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation.Oates, W. E. (1969). The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, 77(6), 957-971.Plastria, F., Gordillo, J., & Carrizosa, E. (2013). Locating a semi-obnoxious covering facility with repelling polygonal regions. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 161(16), 2604-2623.Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34-55.Sirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A., & Zietz, E. N. (2005). The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1), 3-43.Sung, M., & Ki, J. (2021). Effects of Educational and Cultural Facilities on Housing Prices in Seoul from an Accessibility Perspective. Journal of People Plants and Environment, 24, 529-544.Takahashi, L. M., & Dear, M. J. (1997). The Changing Dynamics of Community Opposition to Human Service Facilities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 79-93.Tita, G. E., Petras, T. L., & Greenbaum, R. T. (2006). Crime and residential choice: A neighborhood level analysis of the impact of crime on housing prices [Article]. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(4), 299-317.Wen, H. Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). Do educational facilities affect housing price? An empirical study in Hangzhou, China [Article]. Habitat International, 42, 155-163.Yang, L. C., Wang, B., Zhou, J. P., & Wang, X. (2018). Walking accessibility and property prices [Article]. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 62, 551-562.Zahirovic-Herbert, V., & Gibler, K. M. (2020). Neighbouring house transaction response to assisted living facilities and nursing homes. Housing Studies, 35(2), 195-213. zh_TW
