1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Communication
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 上架自我？ 包養網站上年輕女性的糖關係實踐與展演
Selling Yourself on an Online Store ? Sugar Relationship Practices and Presentation of Young Women on Sugar Dating Websites
作者 胡安妤
Hu, An-Yu
貢獻者 康庭瑜
Kang, Ting-Yu
胡安妤
Hu, An-Yu
關鍵詞 包養網站
甜心寶貝
糖爹
糖關係
關係工作理論
自我展演
sugar dating website
sugar baby
sugar daddy
sugar relationship
relational work
self-presentation
日期 2023
上傳時間 3-Oct-2023 10:46:45 (UTC+8)
摘要 年輕女性的包養網站使用，是淪為人們口舌的話題，也是所謂「甜心寶貝」曾經的誤打誤撞，或理性的現正進行。而眼見現下包養網站參與者的普俗化，當親密與金錢混為一談的糖關係長驅直入至你我跟前，該如何看待、又可從參與者的實踐獲得什麼？成了本研究的發想命題。對此，本研究以關係工作與自我展演觀點，深度訪談9名包養網站的女使用者。
聚焦在女性的糖關係經驗，旨在分析作為經濟受領者的女性如何管理自身的糖關係，了解包養網站此一科技物在糖關係的角色扮演，以及理解女性將一己情感作為商品，上架至包養網站的策略與邏輯。
研究結果發現，女性的糖關係管理，倚藉著甜心寶貝與糖爹的性別角色，及糖關係性腳本所操演的基本條款運行，在錢財的前提下，於實作上提供約會、陪伴乃至於性行為等女朋友服務，並發展出別具特色的支付形式與金錢比喻。而包養網站作為使用者的投入媒介，破除了地理與人際限制，也讓包養成了虛擬配對即可得的活動，但同時反映疑慮，如參與者的風險自負、性別雙重設計與科技不信任。最後，女性使用者的投入有賴一定程度的自我展演與揭露，本文從個人頁面的安排，如照片揀選與資料選填，到通訊媒體的交換，如微信作為管道，乃至於社群媒體的展演，發展出獨特的聚媒體使用與社會劃分方式。
The use of sugar dating websites by young women is a topic of dish the dirt for people, and it is also a participation of girls either like a babe in the woods or under rational self-interest. Now that participants on sugar dating websites have become popular, and sugar relationships that combine intimacy and money have also come to you and me, how should we look at it, and what can we gain from the practices of the participants? It became the inspiration for this study. In this regard, through the perspective of relational work and self-presentation, the study conducted in-depth interviews with 9 female users of sugar dating websites, focusing on young women’s sugar relationship experience, aiming to analyze how women, as financial recipients, manage their sugar relationships. On the other hand, sugar dating websites as a scientific object, The study made an effort to understand their role in sugar relationships and realize how women use their emotional commodities and the strategy and logic of putting themselves on the sugar dating websites.
The study found that females’ sugar relationship management operates through the gender roles of sugar babies and sugar daddies, as well as the sexual scripts of sugar relationships. Under the premise of money, in practice, these girls provided girlfriend experiences such as dating, companionship, and even sexual behaviour, and developed unique payment forms and money metaphors. As a participation intermediary for users, the sugar dating website broke geographical and interpersonal restrictions and also made sugar relationships an online matching activity. However, it also reflected concerns, such as participants’ own risks, the design of double standards in gender, and distrust of technology. Finally, the sugar relationship relied on self-presentation and disclosure of participators. This study ranged from the arrangement of personal pages, such as the selection of photos and personal information, to the exchange of communication media, such as WeChat, and the performance of social media. In the end, we could find that participators of sugar relationships developed unique ways of using polymedia and dividing society.
參考文獻 BBC中文（2018）。〈「甜蜜定制」的社交爭議：交友與援交的一步之遙〉。上網時間：2022年6月22日，取自https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-44241240。
Cooper, A. L.（2002）。《網路與性：愛的尋求與病的治療》（張明玲譯）。台北市：書林。
Giddens, A. （2001/1992）。《親密關係的轉變》（The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality,love & eroticism in modern societies）（周素鳳譯）。台北：巨流。
Hakim, C.（2012）。《姿本力：從會議室到臥室都適用的強大力量》（洪慧芳譯）。台北：財信出版。
一祎（2014）。〈美國“糖爹”PK 中國“乾爹”〉，《新民周刊》， (39)，70-73。
王宏仁（2021）。〈愛情，像極了投資：同志家族企業的親密關係與經濟〉，《臺灣社會學刊》，70 ，77-125。
李宜靜、蔡仕君、王秋霞（2005）。〈大學生包養態度之探討〉，《台南女院學報》， 24：23-40。
李武、毛遠逸（2021）。〈以書會友: 點頭之交還是莫逆之交？閱讀社交網站用戶行為對線上社會資本的影響〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，（55）， 163-195。
肖索未（2013）。〈婚外包養與男性氣質的關係化建構〉。《社會學評論》，(5)， 34-44。
谷玲玲（2002）。〈身份、人際互動與社會規範：網路社群與人際互動關係之研究（II）〉，《國科會專題研究計畫成果報告》。臺北市：國立臺灣大學新聞研究所。
何春蕤（2001）。〈性, 權力與鋼管辣妹 pub: 一個田野的觀察〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，（44），167-199。
姚偉、劉永強譯（2009）。《親密關係的購買》。上海：人民出版社。（原書Zelizer, V. A. [2000]. The purchase of intimacy. Law & Social Inquiry, 25(3), 817-848. ）。
陳美華（2006）。〈公開的勞務，私人的性與身體：在性工作中協商性與工作的女人〉。《台灣社會學》， 11，1-55。
陳美華（2008）。〈不可告人的秘密？一個關於性工作研究中的性，性別與知識生產的反思〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》，71，1-35。
陳美華（2017）。〈美髮作為身體工作：從苦勞到美感協商的身體化勞動〉，《台灣社會學刊》，62，1-58。
胡敏琪（2003）。〈從網路援交現象省思主體消失與主體建構提論〉，《資訊社會研究》，5，359-384。
钟智锦（2015）。〈互联网对大学生网络社会资本和现实社会资本的影响〉，《新闻大学》，3，30-36。
商務印書館辭書研究中心（2003）。《新華新詞語詞典》。香港：商務印書館。
徐聖倫（2015）。《吃好逗相報 魚訊分享靠術語》。《自由時報》。上網時間：2023年9月3日，取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/paper/857408
湯禎兆（2015）。《日本中毒》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
黃小姐（2021）。〈家庭收支調查-平均每戶可支配所得及消費支出依可支配所得按戶數五等分位分及經濟戶長年齡組別分〉，《行政院主計總處》。上網時間：2022年5月29日，取自 https://data.gov.tw/dataset/108265
黃琬桐（2016）。〈見面一次領三萬！曾經大受日本女性歡迎的外快，如今已死灰復燃⋯⋯〉。《風傳媒》。上網時間：2022年5月29日，取自https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/136309。
楊宗斌（2021）。〈88%開學計畫打工！五成三投入家教 90%勞工想兼差！每月外快目標一萬〉，《yes123求職網》。上網時間：2022年5月29日，取自https://www.yes123.com.tw/admin/white_paper/article.asp?id=20210930080241
萬世忠（民 90）。《援助交際》。臺北市：禾馬文化出版。
端傳媒（2016）。〈「甜蜜定制」的社交爭議：交友與援交的一步之遙「真愛」真的無價嗎？同時遭12名「乾爹」包養，女大生一句話戳破社會偽善〉。上網時間：2022年6月30日，取自https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-44241240。
潘淑滿（2003）。《質性研究：理論與應用》。臺北市：國家圖書館。
鄭琪芳（2021）。〈北市生活開銷最凶 人均每月破3萬〉。《自由時報》，取自https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1468426
簡梵軒（2018）。〈交友軟體中 你是使用者還是商品？〉。《喀報》，取自http://castnet.nctu.edu.tw/castnet/article/12797?issueID=694
蘇柔郡、吳筱玫（2018）。〈高中女生使用 Instagram 之日常美學：符擔性觀點〉，《新聞學研究》，135: 139-191。
Abramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Buxmann, P. (2016). Gender differences in online dating. Proceedings of 49th HICSS (pp. 3858–3867). IEEE.
Ahearn L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
Ahuvia, A. C., & Adelman, M. B. (1992). Formal intermediaries in the marriage market: A typology and review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 452-463.
Alacovska, A. (2018). Informal creative labour practices: A relational work perspective. Human Relations, 71(12), 1563-1589.
Albright, J. M., & Carter, S. (2019). The myth of the Siren’s song: Gendered courtship and sexual scripts in online dating. In A. Hetsroni, & M. Tuncez (Eds.), It happened on tinder: Reflections and studies on internet-infused dating (pp. 10–30). INC.
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Amo-Adjei, J., Kumi-Kyereme, A., & Tuoyire, D. A. (2014). Transactional sex among female university students in Ghana: Implications for HIV education. Health Education.
Annabelle Williams (2021).The website for finding `sugar babies` that Matt Gaetz allegedly met women through was founded by an MIT grad who says `love is a concept invented by poor people`. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/seeking-arrangement-sugar-baby-website-founder-owner-2021-4
Archer, C. (2019). “Social Media Influencers, Post-Feminism and Neoliberalism: How Mum Blogger’s ‘Playbour’ is Reshaping Public Relations.” Public Relations Inquiry, 8 (2): 149–166.
Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological bulletin, 91(1), 3 –26.
Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.
Baym, N. K., & Ledbetter, A. (2009). Tunes that bind? Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 408-427.
Beeson-Lynch, C. E. (2017). When daddies and babies fight back: The processes of stigmatization and destigmatization in online news coverage of Sugar Dating (Doctoral dissertation).
Béné, C., & Merten, S. (2008). Women and fish-for-sex: transactional sex, HIV/AIDS and gender in African fisheries. World development, 36(5), 875-899.
Bernstein, E. (2007). Temporarily yours: Intimacy, authenticity, and the commerce of sex. University of Chicago Press.
Birkás, B., Meskó, N., Zsidó, A. N., Ipolyi, D., & Láng, A. (2020). Providing sexual companionship for resources: development, validation, and personality correlates of the acceptance of sugar relationships in young women and men scale (ASR-YWMS). Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1135.
Birnholtz, J., Fitzpatrick, C., Handel, M., & Brubaker, J. R. (2014, September). Identity, identification and identifiability: The language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services (pp. 3-12).
Bonifacio, R., Hair, L., & Wohn, D. Y. (2021). Beyond fans: The relational labor and communication practices of creators on Patreon. New Media & Society, 14614448211027961.
Botnen, E. O., Bendixen, M., Grøntvedt, T. V., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2018). Individual differences in sociosexuality predict picture-based mobile dating app use. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 67-73.
Brouard, P., & Crewe, M. (2012). Sweetening the deal? Sugar daddies, sugar mummies, sugar babies and HIV in contemporary South Africa. Agenda, 26(4), 48-56.
Burkett M., Hamilton K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833.
Campbell, R. (1998). Invisible Men: Making Visible Male Clients of Female Prostitutes in Merseyside. In J. E. Elias, R. N. Vern, L. Bullough, V. Elias, & G. Brewer (Eds.), Prostitution: On Whores, Hustlers, and Johns (pp. 155–171). New York: Prometheus Books.
Cassidy, E., & Wang, W. Y. (2018). Gay men`s digital cultures beyond Gaydar and Grindr: LINE use in the gay Chinese diaspora of Australia. Information, Communication & Society, 21(6), 851-865.
Cederholm, E. A., & Åkerström, M. (2016). With a little help from my friends: relational work in leisure‐related enterprising. The Sociological Review, 64(4), 748-765.
Chan, C. S. C., & Yao, Z. (2018). A market of distrust: toward a cultural sociology of unofficial exchanges between patients and doctors in China. Theory and Society, 47(6), 737-772.
Chu, C. S. K. (2018). Compensated dating: Buying and selling sex in cyberspace. Springer.
Chu, C. S. K., & Laidler, K. J. (2016). Becoming a male client of compensated dating. Deviant Behavior, 37(1), 47-65.
Chung, F. (2019). ‘He Told Me He Was Going to Get What He Paid for’: Sex Worker’s Sugar Baby Horror Story. News.Com.Au. https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/careers/he-told-me-he-was-going-to-get-what-he-paid-for-sex-workers-sugar-baby-horror-story/news-story/4ca5970244473965b6a5dd658dc9f540?ref=techbullets
Comunello, F., Parisi, L., & Ieracitano, F. (2021). Negotiating gender scripts in mobile dating apps: Between affordances, usage norms and practices. Information, Communication & Society, 24(8), 1140-1156.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829-859.
Cordero, B. D. (2015). Sugar culture and SeekingArrangement. com participants: What it means to negotiate power and agency in sugar dating (Master`s thesis, California State University).
Daly, S. E. (2017). Sugar babies and sugar daddies: An exploration of sugar dating on canadian campuses (Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University).
Danielle. (2018, March 1). A BRIEF HISTORY OF SUGAR DATING. Let’s Talk Sugar. https://www.letstalksugar.com/news/brief-history-sugar-dating/
Deeks, L. E. (2012). A website by any other name: Sex, sugar, and Section 230. Women`s Rts. L. Rep., 34, 245.
Di Cicco, M., & Vandevenne, E. (2023). Femininity as a gig? An interface analysis of childcare and sugar dating platforms. AG About Gender-International Journal of Gender Studies, 12(23), 98-139.
Duguay, S., Dietzel, C., & Myles, D. (2022). The year of the “virtual date”: Reimagining dating app affordances during the COVID-19 pandemic. 14614448211072257.
Dunkle, K. L., Jewkes, R. K., Brown, H. C., Gray, G. E., McIntryre, J. A., & Harlow, S. D. (2004). Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. The lancet, 363(9419), 1415-1421.
Eaton, A. A., Rose, S. M., Interligi, C., Fernandez, K., & McHugh, M. (2016). Gender and ethnicity in dating, hanging out, and hooking up. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 788–804.
Ellis, L. D., Patterson, C. L., & Walters, A. S. (2023). “Becoming a Sugar Baby Will Change Your Life. Let’s Talk About How”: Sugar Dating Advice on Tumblr. Sexuality & Culture, 27(2), 484-516.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441.
England, P. (2005). Emerging theories of care work. Annual review of sociology, 381-399.
Fibæk Bertel, T., & Ling, R. (2016). “It’s just not that exciting anymore”: The changing centrality of SMS in the everyday lives of young Danes. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1293-1309.
Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138-141.
Fisher, W. A., & Barak, A. (2000). Online sex shops: Phenomenological, psychological, and ideological perspectives on internet sexuality. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(4), 575-589.
Fitzpatrick, C., Birnholtz, J., & Brubaker, J. R. (2015, January). Social and personal disclosure in a location-based real time dating app. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1983-1992). IEEE.
Folbre, N., & Nelson, J. A. (2000). For love or money--or both?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 123-140.
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C.-H. (2010). First comes love, then comes google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38(1), 70–100.
Ginger..Sugar Daddy. Retrieved from https://www.gingersoftware.com/content/phrases/sugar-daddy/
Gobind, J., & Du Plessis, G. (2015). Sugar daddy: The student attraction. Gender and Behaviour, 13(2), 6720-6729.
Goffman, Erving (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Gunnarsson, L., & Strid, S. (2021). Varieties of sugar dating in Sweden: Content, compensation, motivations. Social Problems., spab063, https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spab063
Gunnarsson, L., & Strid, S. (2022). Chemistry or Service? Sugar Daddies’(Re) quest for Mutuality within the Confines of Commercial Exchange. The Journal of Sex Research, 59(3), 309-320.
Hair, L. (2021). Friends, not ATMs: Parasocial relational work and the construction of intimacy by artists on Patreon. Sociological Spectrum, 41(2), 196-212.
Hakim, C. (2012). Erotic capital, sexual pleasure and sexual markets. Helsinki 3.9. 2012, 27-44.
Haylett, J. (2012). One woman helping another: Egg donation as a case of relational work. Politics & Society, 40(2), 223-247.
Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A. 횤., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100(1), 130-163
Hunter, M. (2002). The materiality of everyday sex: thinking beyond`prostitution`. African Studies, 61(1), 99-120.
Kaufman, C. E., & Stavrou, S. E. (2004). ‘Bus fare please’: the economics of sex and gifts among young people in urban South Africa. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6(5), 377-391.
Kay Hoang, K. (2011). “She’s not a low-class dirty girl!”: Sex work in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(4), 367-396.
Kirkeby, K. M., Lehmiller, J. J., & Marks, M. J. (2021). Sugar Dating, Perceptions of Power, and Condom Use: Comparing the Sexual Health Risk Behaviours of Sugar Dating to Non-Sugar Dating Women. The Journal of Sex Research, 1-11.
Koken, J. A. (2012). Independent female escort’s strategies for coping with sex work related stigma. Sexuality & culture, 16(3), 209-229.
Kontula, A. (2008). The sex worker and her pleasure. Current Sociology, 56(4), 605-620.
Kuate-Defo, B. (2004). Young people`s relationships with sugar daddies and sugar mummies: what do we know and what do we need to know?. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 13-37.
Lang, G., & Smart, J. (2002). Migration and the “Second Wife” in South China: Toward Cross‐Border Polygyny 1. International migration review, 36(2), 546-569.
Leclerc-Madlala, S. (2008). Age-disparate and intergenerational sex in southern Africa: the dynamics of hypervulnerability. Aids, 22, S17-S25.
Lee, T. Y., Shek, D. T. L., & Busiol, D. (2016). A longitudinal study of compensated dating and juvenile prostitution behaviors among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 29(1), S31-S37.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363-385.
Liu, H. (2007). Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 252-275.
Lovejoy, M. C. (2015). Hooking up as an individualistic practice: A double-edged sword for college women. Sexuality & Culture, 19, 464-492.
Luke, N. (2005). Confronting the`sugar daddy`stereotype: age and economic asymmetries and risky sexual behavior in urban Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives, 6-14.
Madianou, M. (2014). Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 667-680.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169-187.
Maganja, R. K., Maman, S., Groves, A., & Mbwambo, J. K. (2007). Skinning the goat and pulling the load: transactional sex among youth in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. AIDS Care, 19(8), 974-981.
Mah, T. L., & Halperin, D. T. (2010). Concurrent sexual partnerships and the HIV epidemics in Africa: evidence to move forward. AIDS and Behavior, 14(1), 11-16.
Masvawure, T. (2010). ‘I just need to be flashy on campus’: female students and transactional sex at a university in Zimbabwe. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(8), 857-870.
McKenna, K. Y., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 9-31.
Mears, A. (2015). Working for Free in the VIP: Relational Work and the Production of Consent. American Sociological Review, 80(6), 1099-1122.
Mill, J. E., & Anarfi, J. K. (2002). HIV risk environment for Ghanaian women: challenges to prevention. Social Science & Medicine, 54(3), 325-337.
Miller, A. (2011). Sugar dating: A new take on an old issue. Buff. J. Gender L. & Soc. Pol`y, 20, 33-68.
Milrod, C., & Monto, M. A. (2012). The hobbyist and the girlfriend experience: Behaviors and preferences of male customers of internet sexual service providers. Deviant Behavior, 33(10), 792–810.
Mixon, F. G. (2019). Sugar daddy u: human capital investment and the university-based supply of ‘romantic arrangements’. Applied economics, 51(9), 956-971.
Monto Martin. 2004. “Female Prostitution, Customers, and Violence.” Violence Against Women 10(2):160–188.
Motyl, J. (2012). Trading sex for college tuition: how sugar daddy dating sites may be sugar coating prostitution. Penn St. L. Rev., 117, 927-957.
Motz Tracy. 2014. “Sugar Daddy Website Has Coeds Justifying Prostitution.” New York Post. February 9. Retrieved July 3, 2018 (https://nypost.com/2014/02/09/sugar-daddy-website-has-coeds-rationalizing-prostitution/).
Nayar, K. I. (2017). Sweetening the deal: Dating for compensation in the digital age. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 335-346.
Ogaki, Mutsumi (2018) "Theoretical Explanations of Jyoshi Kousei Business ("JK Business") in Japan,"Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence, 3(1), Article 11, https://doi.org/10.23860/dignity.2018.03.01.11
Oselin, S. S., & Hail-Jares, K. (2022). It’s Not Just Sex: Relational Dynamics between Street-Based Sex Workers and Their Regular Customers. Work, Employment and Society, 36(5), 893-910.
Palomeque Recio, R. (2021). ‘I have bills to pay!’Sugar dating in British higher education institutions. Gender and Education, 1-16.
Parks, M. R. (2010). Social network sites as virtual communities. In A networked self (pp. 113-131). Routledge.
Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4), JCMC144 , https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00176.x
Pawlowski, B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1999a). Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 281-285.
Phoenix, J. (1999). Making sense of prostitution. Springer.
Putman, P. (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Quinion, M. (2014). Sugar Daddy. Retrieved from: http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-sug2.htm
Rawlins, W. K. (2008). The compass of friendship: Narratives, identities, and dialogues. Sage Publications.
Recio, R. P. (2022). Blurred lines: Technologies of heterosexual coercion in “sugar dating”. Feminism & Psychology, 32(1), 44-61.
Renninger, B. J. (2015). “Where I can be myself… where I can speak my mind”: Networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1513-1529.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community, revised edition: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT press.
Rottenberg, C. (2014). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies, 28 , 418–437.10.1080/09502386.2013.857361
Rubin, G. S. (2002). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Culture, Society and Sexuality A Reader (pp. 143-178). Routledge.
Sanders Teela.(2005). “‘It’s Just Acting’: Sex Workers’ Strategies for Capitalizing on Sexuality.” Gender, Work & Organization 12(4):319–342.
Sanders, T. (2013). Paying for pleasure: Men who buy sex. Routledge.
Scull, M. T. (2023). Sugaring as a deviant career: Modes of entering sugar relationships and social stigmas. Deviant Behavior, 44(4), 528-550.
Selikow, T. A., & Mbulaheni, T. (2013). “I do love him but at the same time I can`t eat love”: Sugar daddy relationships for conspicuous consumption amongst urban university students in South Africa. Agenda, 27(2), 86-98.
Selinger-Morris, S. (2016, September 10). Inside the World of “sugar” Relationships. ABC NEWS.https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-10/inside-the-world-of-sugar-relationships/7822586
Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447-458.
Shefer, T., & Strebel, A. (2012). Deconstructing the ‘sugar daddy’: A critical review of the constructions of men in intergenerational sexual relationships in South Africa. Agenda, 26(4), 57-63.
Shefer, T., Clowes, L., & Vergnani, T. (2012). Narratives of transactional sex on a university campus. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 14(4), 435-447.
Shepardson, R. L., Walsh, J. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2016). Benefits of hooking up: Self-reports from first-year college women. International Journal of Sexual Health, 28(3), 216-220.
Song, J., & Morash, M. (2016). Materialistic desires or childhood adversities as explanations for girls’ trading sex for benefits. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(1), 62-81.
Spinelli, L. H. P., Hattori, W. T., & Sousa, M. B. C. D. (2010). Why do women not prefer much older men? A hypothesis based on alterations in male reproductive physiology related to increased age. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 15, 119-123.
Stoebenau, K., Heise, L., Wamoyi, J., & Bobrova, N. (2017). “Revisiting the understanding of “transactional sex” in sub-Saharan Africa: A review and synthesis of the literature”(Social Science and Medicine (2016) 168 (186–197)(S0277953616305305)(10.1016/j. socscimed. 2016.09. 023)). Social Science and Medicine, 168, 186-197.
Story, R., and G. Jankowski.(2015) “Victor or Victim? Foregrounding the Independent Escort Experience Outside of the Polarised Debate.” Graduate Journal of Social Science, 11 (2), 4–20.
Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1023-1036.
Toska, E., Cluver, L. D., Boyes, M., Pantelic, M., & Kuo, C. (2015). From ‘sugar daddies’ to ‘sugar babies’: exploring a pathway among age-disparate sexual relationships, condom use and adolescent pregnancy in South Africa. Sexual health, 12(1), 59-66.
Ueno, C. (2003). Self-determination on sexuality? Commercialization of sex among teenage girls in Japan 1. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 4(2), 317-324.
Upadhyay, S. (2021). Sugaring: Understanding the world of sugar daddies and sugar babies. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(6), 775-784.
VICENews（2021/6/10）Why Malaysia Is Cracking Down On Online Sugar Daddies.Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzvzvsHnZAI
Wade, B. (2009). Seeking arrangement: The definitive guide to sugar daddy and mutually beneficial arrangements. InfoStream Group Inc.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
Westerstrand, J. (2012). " Prostitutionsfrågan"-perspektiv och nycklar till en grumlig debatt. Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, 3, 101-123.
Wong-O’Connor, A. (2022). The sweet and sour in sugar baby relationships: social expectations, emotion work and stigma management (Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University).
Zembe, Y. Z., Townsend, L., Thorson, A., & Ekström, A. M. (2013). “Money talks, bullshit walks” interrogating notions of consumption and survival sex among young women engaging in transactional sex in post-apartheid South Africa: a qualitative enquiry. Globalization and Health, 9(1), 1-16.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
109464023
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109464023
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 康庭瑜zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Kang, Ting-Yuen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 胡安妤zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hu, An-Yuen_US
dc.creator (作者) 胡安妤zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hu, An-Yuen_US
dc.date (日期) 2023en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Oct-2023 10:46:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Oct-2023 10:46:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Oct-2023 10:46:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109464023en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147739-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 109464023zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 年輕女性的包養網站使用，是淪為人們口舌的話題，也是所謂「甜心寶貝」曾經的誤打誤撞，或理性的現正進行。而眼見現下包養網站參與者的普俗化，當親密與金錢混為一談的糖關係長驅直入至你我跟前，該如何看待、又可從參與者的實踐獲得什麼？成了本研究的發想命題。對此，本研究以關係工作與自我展演觀點，深度訪談9名包養網站的女使用者。
聚焦在女性的糖關係經驗，旨在分析作為經濟受領者的女性如何管理自身的糖關係，了解包養網站此一科技物在糖關係的角色扮演，以及理解女性將一己情感作為商品，上架至包養網站的策略與邏輯。
研究結果發現，女性的糖關係管理，倚藉著甜心寶貝與糖爹的性別角色，及糖關係性腳本所操演的基本條款運行，在錢財的前提下，於實作上提供約會、陪伴乃至於性行為等女朋友服務，並發展出別具特色的支付形式與金錢比喻。而包養網站作為使用者的投入媒介，破除了地理與人際限制，也讓包養成了虛擬配對即可得的活動，但同時反映疑慮，如參與者的風險自負、性別雙重設計與科技不信任。最後，女性使用者的投入有賴一定程度的自我展演與揭露，本文從個人頁面的安排，如照片揀選與資料選填，到通訊媒體的交換，如微信作為管道，乃至於社群媒體的展演，發展出獨特的聚媒體使用與社會劃分方式。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The use of sugar dating websites by young women is a topic of dish the dirt for people, and it is also a participation of girls either like a babe in the woods or under rational self-interest. Now that participants on sugar dating websites have become popular, and sugar relationships that combine intimacy and money have also come to you and me, how should we look at it, and what can we gain from the practices of the participants? It became the inspiration for this study. In this regard, through the perspective of relational work and self-presentation, the study conducted in-depth interviews with 9 female users of sugar dating websites, focusing on young women’s sugar relationship experience, aiming to analyze how women, as financial recipients, manage their sugar relationships. On the other hand, sugar dating websites as a scientific object, The study made an effort to understand their role in sugar relationships and realize how women use their emotional commodities and the strategy and logic of putting themselves on the sugar dating websites.
The study found that females’ sugar relationship management operates through the gender roles of sugar babies and sugar daddies, as well as the sexual scripts of sugar relationships. Under the premise of money, in practice, these girls provided girlfriend experiences such as dating, companionship, and even sexual behaviour, and developed unique payment forms and money metaphors. As a participation intermediary for users, the sugar dating website broke geographical and interpersonal restrictions and also made sugar relationships an online matching activity. However, it also reflected concerns, such as participants’ own risks, the design of double standards in gender, and distrust of technology. Finally, the sugar relationship relied on self-presentation and disclosure of participators. This study ranged from the arrangement of personal pages, such as the selection of photos and personal information, to the exchange of communication media, such as WeChat, and the performance of social media. In the end, we could find that participators of sugar relationships developed unique ways of using polymedia and dividing society.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 包養網站相關概念討論 9
一、何謂包養 9
二、通訊技術加持：援助交際 11
三、西方世界包養網站研究 13
四、研究範疇討論 18
第二節、網路空間與糖關係 20
一、網路空間的特性 20
二、從線上找親密的自我展演 23
三、兩性投入糖關係的動機 26
第三節、沒錢、沒關係？ 33
一、關係工作理論 33
二、你配不配？關係工作中的適配 35
三、關係工作框架下的相關研究 37
第三章、研究方法 40
第一節、半結構式訪談法 40
第二節、研究場域描述 41
一、包養平台比較：首頁 43
二、包養平台比較：網站使用教學 47
三、包養平台比較：個人頁面展演 49
四、包養平台比較：搜尋頁面 52
五、包養平台比較：收訊功能 55
六、包養平台比較：其他功能 56
第三節 研究對象招募 59
第四節 訪談工具 65
第五節 研究對象簡述 67
第四章 關係工作—糖關係動機、定位及勞動與財務 70
第一節 百花入叢林—從錢說起的故事？ 70
第二節 關係定位—作為甜心 74
第三節 甜心的勞務 78
第四節 甜心的財務 83
一、開價 83
二、金錢支付與轉化 87
三、車馬費 90
四、禮物 93
第五節 關係的邊界 96
第五章 糖關係為何物：劃界與分類 101
第一節 無承諾與情感基礎的浪漫協定 101
第二節 滿是情緒勞動的playbour？ 106
第三節 與性產業劃界 108
第六章 包養網站的科技角色 112
第一節 網站作為糖關係之實踐管道 112
一、網站作為媒介 112
二、近用與普及 113
三、弱關係與基於地理的匯聚 114
第二節 性別失衡與科技不信任 115
一、風險自負的去標籤 116
二、性別雙重標準的設計 118
三、科技不信任 120
第三節 聚媒體的選擇：wechat（微信）作為聯繫 123
第七章 個人頁面的展演：自保與反詰 127
第一節 社群中的糖關係展演：噤聲或炫耀？ 127
第二節 去辨識作為揭露 129
第三節 不露臉的性別展演 133
第八章、結論與建議 137
第一節、研究問題概答 137
一、女性的糖關係管理 137
二、數位科技（包養網站）的糖關係角色 141
三、包養網站中糖關係的自我展演與揭露 142
第二節、理論再對話 144
第三節、侷限與建議 146
參考文獻 148		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 7407709 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109464023en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 包養網站zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 甜心寶貝zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 糖爹zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 糖關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 關係工作理論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自我展演zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) sugar dating websiteen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) sugar babyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) sugar daddyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) sugar relationshipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) relational worken_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) self-presentationen_US
dc.title (題名) 上架自我？ 包養網站上年輕女性的糖關係實踐與展演zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Selling Yourself on an Online Store ? Sugar Relationship Practices and Presentation of Young Women on Sugar Dating Websitesen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) BBC中文（2018）。〈「甜蜜定制」的社交爭議：交友與援交的一步之遙〉。上網時間：2022年6月22日，取自https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-44241240。
Cooper, A. L.（2002）。《網路與性：愛的尋求與病的治療》（張明玲譯）。台北市：書林。
Giddens, A. （2001/1992）。《親密關係的轉變》（The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality,love & eroticism in modern societies）（周素鳳譯）。台北：巨流。
Hakim, C.（2012）。《姿本力：從會議室到臥室都適用的強大力量》（洪慧芳譯）。台北：財信出版。
一祎（2014）。〈美國“糖爹”PK 中國“乾爹”〉，《新民周刊》， (39)，70-73。
王宏仁（2021）。〈愛情，像極了投資：同志家族企業的親密關係與經濟〉，《臺灣社會學刊》，70 ，77-125。
李宜靜、蔡仕君、王秋霞（2005）。〈大學生包養態度之探討〉，《台南女院學報》， 24：23-40。
李武、毛遠逸（2021）。〈以書會友: 點頭之交還是莫逆之交？閱讀社交網站用戶行為對線上社會資本的影響〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，（55）， 163-195。
肖索未（2013）。〈婚外包養與男性氣質的關係化建構〉。《社會學評論》，(5)， 34-44。
谷玲玲（2002）。〈身份、人際互動與社會規範：網路社群與人際互動關係之研究（II）〉，《國科會專題研究計畫成果報告》。臺北市：國立臺灣大學新聞研究所。
何春蕤（2001）。〈性, 權力與鋼管辣妹 pub: 一個田野的觀察〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，（44），167-199。
姚偉、劉永強譯（2009）。《親密關係的購買》。上海：人民出版社。（原書Zelizer, V. A. [2000]. The purchase of intimacy. Law & Social Inquiry, 25(3), 817-848. ）。
陳美華（2006）。〈公開的勞務，私人的性與身體：在性工作中協商性與工作的女人〉。《台灣社會學》， 11，1-55。
陳美華（2008）。〈不可告人的秘密？一個關於性工作研究中的性，性別與知識生產的反思〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》，71，1-35。
陳美華（2017）。〈美髮作為身體工作：從苦勞到美感協商的身體化勞動〉，《台灣社會學刊》，62，1-58。
胡敏琪（2003）。〈從網路援交現象省思主體消失與主體建構提論〉，《資訊社會研究》，5，359-384。
钟智锦（2015）。〈互联网对大学生网络社会资本和现实社会资本的影响〉，《新闻大学》，3，30-36。
商務印書館辭書研究中心（2003）。《新華新詞語詞典》。香港：商務印書館。
徐聖倫（2015）。《吃好逗相報 魚訊分享靠術語》。《自由時報》。上網時間：2023年9月3日，取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/paper/857408
湯禎兆（2015）。《日本中毒》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
黃小姐（2021）。〈家庭收支調查-平均每戶可支配所得及消費支出依可支配所得按戶數五等分位分及經濟戶長年齡組別分〉，《行政院主計總處》。上網時間：2022年5月29日，取自 https://data.gov.tw/dataset/108265
黃琬桐（2016）。〈見面一次領三萬！曾經大受日本女性歡迎的外快，如今已死灰復燃⋯⋯〉。《風傳媒》。上網時間：2022年5月29日，取自https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/136309。
楊宗斌（2021）。〈88%開學計畫打工！五成三投入家教 90%勞工想兼差！每月外快目標一萬〉，《yes123求職網》。上網時間：2022年5月29日，取自https://www.yes123.com.tw/admin/white_paper/article.asp?id=20210930080241
萬世忠（民 90）。《援助交際》。臺北市：禾馬文化出版。
端傳媒（2016）。〈「甜蜜定制」的社交爭議：交友與援交的一步之遙「真愛」真的無價嗎？同時遭12名「乾爹」包養，女大生一句話戳破社會偽善〉。上網時間：2022年6月30日，取自https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-44241240。
潘淑滿（2003）。《質性研究：理論與應用》。臺北市：國家圖書館。
鄭琪芳（2021）。〈北市生活開銷最凶 人均每月破3萬〉。《自由時報》，取自https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1468426
簡梵軒（2018）。〈交友軟體中 你是使用者還是商品？〉。《喀報》，取自http://castnet.nctu.edu.tw/castnet/article/12797?issueID=694
蘇柔郡、吳筱玫（2018）。〈高中女生使用 Instagram 之日常美學：符擔性觀點〉，《新聞學研究》，135: 139-191。
Abramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Buxmann, P. (2016). Gender differences in online dating. Proceedings of 49th HICSS (pp. 3858–3867). IEEE.
Ahearn L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
Ahuvia, A. C., & Adelman, M. B. (1992). Formal intermediaries in the marriage market: A typology and review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 452-463.
Alacovska, A. (2018). Informal creative labour practices: A relational work perspective. Human Relations, 71(12), 1563-1589.
Albright, J. M., & Carter, S. (2019). The myth of the Siren’s song: Gendered courtship and sexual scripts in online dating. In A. Hetsroni, & M. Tuncez (Eds.), It happened on tinder: Reflections and studies on internet-infused dating (pp. 10–30). INC.
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Amo-Adjei, J., Kumi-Kyereme, A., & Tuoyire, D. A. (2014). Transactional sex among female university students in Ghana: Implications for HIV education. Health Education.
Annabelle Williams (2021).The website for finding `sugar babies` that Matt Gaetz allegedly met women through was founded by an MIT grad who says `love is a concept invented by poor people`. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/seeking-arrangement-sugar-baby-website-founder-owner-2021-4
Archer, C. (2019). “Social Media Influencers, Post-Feminism and Neoliberalism: How Mum Blogger’s ‘Playbour’ is Reshaping Public Relations.” Public Relations Inquiry, 8 (2): 149–166.
Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological bulletin, 91(1), 3 –26.
Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.
Baym, N. K., & Ledbetter, A. (2009). Tunes that bind? Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 408-427.
Beeson-Lynch, C. E. (2017). When daddies and babies fight back: The processes of stigmatization and destigmatization in online news coverage of Sugar Dating (Doctoral dissertation).
Béné, C., & Merten, S. (2008). Women and fish-for-sex: transactional sex, HIV/AIDS and gender in African fisheries. World development, 36(5), 875-899.
Bernstein, E. (2007). Temporarily yours: Intimacy, authenticity, and the commerce of sex. University of Chicago Press.
Birkás, B., Meskó, N., Zsidó, A. N., Ipolyi, D., & Láng, A. (2020). Providing sexual companionship for resources: development, validation, and personality correlates of the acceptance of sugar relationships in young women and men scale (ASR-YWMS). Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1135.
Birnholtz, J., Fitzpatrick, C., Handel, M., & Brubaker, J. R. (2014, September). Identity, identification and identifiability: The language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services (pp. 3-12).
Bonifacio, R., Hair, L., & Wohn, D. Y. (2021). Beyond fans: The relational labor and communication practices of creators on Patreon. New Media & Society, 14614448211027961.
Botnen, E. O., Bendixen, M., Grøntvedt, T. V., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2018). Individual differences in sociosexuality predict picture-based mobile dating app use. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 67-73.
Brouard, P., & Crewe, M. (2012). Sweetening the deal? Sugar daddies, sugar mummies, sugar babies and HIV in contemporary South Africa. Agenda, 26(4), 48-56.
Burkett M., Hamilton K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833.
Campbell, R. (1998). Invisible Men: Making Visible Male Clients of Female Prostitutes in Merseyside. In J. E. Elias, R. N. Vern, L. Bullough, V. Elias, & G. Brewer (Eds.), Prostitution: On Whores, Hustlers, and Johns (pp. 155–171). New York: Prometheus Books.
Cassidy, E., & Wang, W. Y. (2018). Gay men`s digital cultures beyond Gaydar and Grindr: LINE use in the gay Chinese diaspora of Australia. Information, Communication & Society, 21(6), 851-865.
Cederholm, E. A., & Åkerström, M. (2016). With a little help from my friends: relational work in leisure‐related enterprising. The Sociological Review, 64(4), 748-765.
Chan, C. S. C., & Yao, Z. (2018). A market of distrust: toward a cultural sociology of unofficial exchanges between patients and doctors in China. Theory and Society, 47(6), 737-772.
Chu, C. S. K. (2018). Compensated dating: Buying and selling sex in cyberspace. Springer.
Chu, C. S. K., & Laidler, K. J. (2016). Becoming a male client of compensated dating. Deviant Behavior, 37(1), 47-65.
Chung, F. (2019). ‘He Told Me He Was Going to Get What He Paid for’: Sex Worker’s Sugar Baby Horror Story. News.Com.Au. https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/careers/he-told-me-he-was-going-to-get-what-he-paid-for-sex-workers-sugar-baby-horror-story/news-story/4ca5970244473965b6a5dd658dc9f540?ref=techbullets
Comunello, F., Parisi, L., & Ieracitano, F. (2021). Negotiating gender scripts in mobile dating apps: Between affordances, usage norms and practices. Information, Communication & Society, 24(8), 1140-1156.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829-859.
Cordero, B. D. (2015). Sugar culture and SeekingArrangement. com participants: What it means to negotiate power and agency in sugar dating (Master`s thesis, California State University).
Daly, S. E. (2017). Sugar babies and sugar daddies: An exploration of sugar dating on canadian campuses (Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University).
Danielle. (2018, March 1). A BRIEF HISTORY OF SUGAR DATING. Let’s Talk Sugar. https://www.letstalksugar.com/news/brief-history-sugar-dating/
Deeks, L. E. (2012). A website by any other name: Sex, sugar, and Section 230. Women`s Rts. L. Rep., 34, 245.
Di Cicco, M., & Vandevenne, E. (2023). Femininity as a gig? An interface analysis of childcare and sugar dating platforms. AG About Gender-International Journal of Gender Studies, 12(23), 98-139.
Duguay, S., Dietzel, C., & Myles, D. (2022). The year of the “virtual date”: Reimagining dating app affordances during the COVID-19 pandemic. 14614448211072257.
Dunkle, K. L., Jewkes, R. K., Brown, H. C., Gray, G. E., McIntryre, J. A., & Harlow, S. D. (2004). Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. The lancet, 363(9419), 1415-1421.
Eaton, A. A., Rose, S. M., Interligi, C., Fernandez, K., & McHugh, M. (2016). Gender and ethnicity in dating, hanging out, and hooking up. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 788–804.
Ellis, L. D., Patterson, C. L., & Walters, A. S. (2023). “Becoming a Sugar Baby Will Change Your Life. Let’s Talk About How”: Sugar Dating Advice on Tumblr. Sexuality & Culture, 27(2), 484-516.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441.
England, P. (2005). Emerging theories of care work. Annual review of sociology, 381-399.
Fibæk Bertel, T., & Ling, R. (2016). “It’s just not that exciting anymore”: The changing centrality of SMS in the everyday lives of young Danes. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1293-1309.
Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138-141.
Fisher, W. A., & Barak, A. (2000). Online sex shops: Phenomenological, psychological, and ideological perspectives on internet sexuality. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(4), 575-589.
Fitzpatrick, C., Birnholtz, J., & Brubaker, J. R. (2015, January). Social and personal disclosure in a location-based real time dating app. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1983-1992). IEEE.
Folbre, N., & Nelson, J. A. (2000). For love or money--or both?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 123-140.
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C.-H. (2010). First comes love, then comes google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38(1), 70–100.
Ginger..Sugar Daddy. Retrieved from https://www.gingersoftware.com/content/phrases/sugar-daddy/
Gobind, J., & Du Plessis, G. (2015). Sugar daddy: The student attraction. Gender and Behaviour, 13(2), 6720-6729.
Goffman, Erving (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Gunnarsson, L., & Strid, S. (2021). Varieties of sugar dating in Sweden: Content, compensation, motivations. Social Problems., spab063, https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spab063
Gunnarsson, L., & Strid, S. (2022). Chemistry or Service? Sugar Daddies’(Re) quest for Mutuality within the Confines of Commercial Exchange. The Journal of Sex Research, 59(3), 309-320.
Hair, L. (2021). Friends, not ATMs: Parasocial relational work and the construction of intimacy by artists on Patreon. Sociological Spectrum, 41(2), 196-212.
Hakim, C. (2012). Erotic capital, sexual pleasure and sexual markets. Helsinki 3.9. 2012, 27-44.
Haylett, J. (2012). One woman helping another: Egg donation as a case of relational work. Politics & Society, 40(2), 223-247.
Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A. 횤., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100(1), 130-163
Hunter, M. (2002). The materiality of everyday sex: thinking beyond`prostitution`. African Studies, 61(1), 99-120.
Kaufman, C. E., & Stavrou, S. E. (2004). ‘Bus fare please’: the economics of sex and gifts among young people in urban South Africa. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6(5), 377-391.
Kay Hoang, K. (2011). “She’s not a low-class dirty girl!”: Sex work in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(4), 367-396.
Kirkeby, K. M., Lehmiller, J. J., & Marks, M. J. (2021). Sugar Dating, Perceptions of Power, and Condom Use: Comparing the Sexual Health Risk Behaviours of Sugar Dating to Non-Sugar Dating Women. The Journal of Sex Research, 1-11.
Koken, J. A. (2012). Independent female escort’s strategies for coping with sex work related stigma. Sexuality & culture, 16(3), 209-229.
Kontula, A. (2008). The sex worker and her pleasure. Current Sociology, 56(4), 605-620.
Kuate-Defo, B. (2004). Young people`s relationships with sugar daddies and sugar mummies: what do we know and what do we need to know?. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 13-37.
Lang, G., & Smart, J. (2002). Migration and the “Second Wife” in South China: Toward Cross‐Border Polygyny 1. International migration review, 36(2), 546-569.
Leclerc-Madlala, S. (2008). Age-disparate and intergenerational sex in southern Africa: the dynamics of hypervulnerability. Aids, 22, S17-S25.
Lee, T. Y., Shek, D. T. L., & Busiol, D. (2016). A longitudinal study of compensated dating and juvenile prostitution behaviors among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 29(1), S31-S37.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363-385.
Liu, H. (2007). Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 252-275.
Lovejoy, M. C. (2015). Hooking up as an individualistic practice: A double-edged sword for college women. Sexuality & Culture, 19, 464-492.
Luke, N. (2005). Confronting the`sugar daddy`stereotype: age and economic asymmetries and risky sexual behavior in urban Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives, 6-14.
Madianou, M. (2014). Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 667-680.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169-187.
Maganja, R. K., Maman, S., Groves, A., & Mbwambo, J. K. (2007). Skinning the goat and pulling the load: transactional sex among youth in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. AIDS Care, 19(8), 974-981.
Mah, T. L., & Halperin, D. T. (2010). Concurrent sexual partnerships and the HIV epidemics in Africa: evidence to move forward. AIDS and Behavior, 14(1), 11-16.
Masvawure, T. (2010). ‘I just need to be flashy on campus’: female students and transactional sex at a university in Zimbabwe. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(8), 857-870.
McKenna, K. Y., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 9-31.
Mears, A. (2015). Working for Free in the VIP: Relational Work and the Production of Consent. American Sociological Review, 80(6), 1099-1122.
Mill, J. E., & Anarfi, J. K. (2002). HIV risk environment for Ghanaian women: challenges to prevention. Social Science & Medicine, 54(3), 325-337.
Miller, A. (2011). Sugar dating: A new take on an old issue. Buff. J. Gender L. & Soc. Pol`y, 20, 33-68.
Milrod, C., & Monto, M. A. (2012). The hobbyist and the girlfriend experience: Behaviors and preferences of male customers of internet sexual service providers. Deviant Behavior, 33(10), 792–810.
Mixon, F. G. (2019). Sugar daddy u: human capital investment and the university-based supply of ‘romantic arrangements’. Applied economics, 51(9), 956-971.
Monto Martin. 2004. “Female Prostitution, Customers, and Violence.” Violence Against Women 10(2):160–188.
Motyl, J. (2012). Trading sex for college tuition: how sugar daddy dating sites may be sugar coating prostitution. Penn St. L. Rev., 117, 927-957.
Motz Tracy. 2014. “Sugar Daddy Website Has Coeds Justifying Prostitution.” New York Post. February 9. Retrieved July 3, 2018 (https://nypost.com/2014/02/09/sugar-daddy-website-has-coeds-rationalizing-prostitution/).
Nayar, K. I. (2017). Sweetening the deal: Dating for compensation in the digital age. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 335-346.
Ogaki, Mutsumi (2018) "Theoretical Explanations of Jyoshi Kousei Business ("JK Business") in Japan,"Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence, 3(1), Article 11, https://doi.org/10.23860/dignity.2018.03.01.11
Oselin, S. S., & Hail-Jares, K. (2022). It’s Not Just Sex: Relational Dynamics between Street-Based Sex Workers and Their Regular Customers. Work, Employment and Society, 36(5), 893-910.
Palomeque Recio, R. (2021). ‘I have bills to pay!’Sugar dating in British higher education institutions. Gender and Education, 1-16.
Parks, M. R. (2010). Social network sites as virtual communities. In A networked self (pp. 113-131). Routledge.
Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4), JCMC144 , https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00176.x
Pawlowski, B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1999a). Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 281-285.
Phoenix, J. (1999). Making sense of prostitution. Springer.
Putman, P. (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Quinion, M. (2014). Sugar Daddy. Retrieved from: http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-sug2.htm
Rawlins, W. K. (2008). The compass of friendship: Narratives, identities, and dialogues. Sage Publications.
Recio, R. P. (2022). Blurred lines: Technologies of heterosexual coercion in “sugar dating”. Feminism & Psychology, 32(1), 44-61.
Renninger, B. J. (2015). “Where I can be myself… where I can speak my mind”: Networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1513-1529.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community, revised edition: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT press.
Rottenberg, C. (2014). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies, 28 , 418–437.10.1080/09502386.2013.857361
Rubin, G. S. (2002). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In Culture, Society and Sexuality A Reader (pp. 143-178). Routledge.
Sanders Teela.(2005). “‘It’s Just Acting’: Sex Workers’ Strategies for Capitalizing on Sexuality.” Gender, Work & Organization 12(4):319–342.
Sanders, T. (2013). Paying for pleasure: Men who buy sex. Routledge.
Scull, M. T. (2023). Sugaring as a deviant career: Modes of entering sugar relationships and social stigmas. Deviant Behavior, 44(4), 528-550.
Selikow, T. A., & Mbulaheni, T. (2013). “I do love him but at the same time I can`t eat love”: Sugar daddy relationships for conspicuous consumption amongst urban university students in South Africa. Agenda, 27(2), 86-98.
Selinger-Morris, S. (2016, September 10). Inside the World of “sugar” Relationships. ABC NEWS.https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-10/inside-the-world-of-sugar-relationships/7822586
Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447-458.
Shefer, T., & Strebel, A. (2012). Deconstructing the ‘sugar daddy’: A critical review of the constructions of men in intergenerational sexual relationships in South Africa. Agenda, 26(4), 57-63.
Shefer, T., Clowes, L., & Vergnani, T. (2012). Narratives of transactional sex on a university campus. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 14(4), 435-447.
Shepardson, R. L., Walsh, J. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2016). Benefits of hooking up: Self-reports from first-year college women. International Journal of Sexual Health, 28(3), 216-220.
Song, J., & Morash, M. (2016). Materialistic desires or childhood adversities as explanations for girls’ trading sex for benefits. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(1), 62-81.
Spinelli, L. H. P., Hattori, W. T., & Sousa, M. B. C. D. (2010). Why do women not prefer much older men? A hypothesis based on alterations in male reproductive physiology related to increased age. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 15, 119-123.
Stoebenau, K., Heise, L., Wamoyi, J., & Bobrova, N. (2017). “Revisiting the understanding of “transactional sex” in sub-Saharan Africa: A review and synthesis of the literature”(Social Science and Medicine (2016) 168 (186–197)(S0277953616305305)(10.1016/j. socscimed. 2016.09. 023)). Social Science and Medicine, 168, 186-197.
Story, R., and G. Jankowski.(2015) “Victor or Victim? Foregrounding the Independent Escort Experience Outside of the Polarised Debate.” Graduate Journal of Social Science, 11 (2), 4–20.
Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1023-1036.
Toska, E., Cluver, L. D., Boyes, M., Pantelic, M., & Kuo, C. (2015). From ‘sugar daddies’ to ‘sugar babies’: exploring a pathway among age-disparate sexual relationships, condom use and adolescent pregnancy in South Africa. Sexual health, 12(1), 59-66.
Ueno, C. (2003). Self-determination on sexuality? Commercialization of sex among teenage girls in Japan 1. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 4(2), 317-324.
Upadhyay, S. (2021). Sugaring: Understanding the world of sugar daddies and sugar babies. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(6), 775-784.
VICENews（2021/6/10）Why Malaysia Is Cracking Down On Online Sugar Daddies.Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzvzvsHnZAI
Wade, B. (2009). Seeking arrangement: The definitive guide to sugar daddy and mutually beneficial arrangements. InfoStream Group Inc.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
Westerstrand, J. (2012). " Prostitutionsfrågan"-perspektiv och nycklar till en grumlig debatt. Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, 3, 101-123.
Wong-O’Connor, A. (2022). The sweet and sour in sugar baby relationships: social expectations, emotion work and stigma management (Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University).
Zembe, Y. Z., Townsend, L., Thorson, A., & Ekström, A. M. (2013). “Money talks, bullshit walks” interrogating notions of consumption and survival sex among young women engaging in transactional sex in post-apartheid South Africa: a qualitative enquiry. Globalization and Health, 9(1), 1-16.		zh_TW