1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 深度偽造的投毒防禦技術研究
Poison Defense on Deepfake Attacks
作者 郭丞堯
Guo, Cheng-Yao
貢獻者 郁方
Yu, Fang
郭丞堯
Guo, Cheng-Yao
關鍵詞 毒藥防禦
深度偽造
對抗例攻擊
Poison defense
Deepfake
Adversarial attack
日期 2024
上傳時間 1-Feb-2024 10:56:20 (UTC+8)
摘要 深度偽造技術的應用已趨於成熟，並在網路上廣泛傳播。這項技術的濫用會導致人們的隱私與安全受到侵害。為應對這一威脅，我們引入了一種新的防禦策略，稱為“糖衣毒藥”。該方法涉及在生成模型的學習過程中有策略地擾動潛在向量。通過設計，我們的方法旨在將視覺效果視為“毒藥”，引發故意的干擾，同時最小化重建損失充當“糖衣”，誤導深度偽造模型。這種雙重目的的策略能有效地抵禦深度偽造攻擊，並提高被檢測率。我們提出了一種系統性的機制，來生成影片補丁，以減輕與深度偽造相關的風險，並在特定的深度偽造人臉交換應用背景下實施和驗證我們的方法。
The application of deepfake face-swapping technology has matured and become widespread on the internet, posing a significant threat to application security and privacy. In response to this growing concern, we introduce a novel defense strategy named "sugar-coated poison." This approach involves strategically perturbing latent vectors during the learning process of generative models. By design, our method aims to treat visual effects as the "poison," inducing intentional disruptions, while minimizing reconstruction loss acts as the "sugar," misleading the deepfake model. This dual-purpose strategy effectively defends against deepfake attacks. We present a systematic mechanism for generating video patches to mitigate the risks associated with deepfake manipulation, implementing and validating our approach specifically in the context of deepfake face-swapping applications.
參考文獻 [1] Dlib library. http://dlib.net/. Accessed: 2023-12-01. [2] Faceswap. https://github.com/deepfakes/faceswap. Accessed: 2023-12-01. [3] Ffmpeg. https://ffmpeg.org/. Accessed: 2023-12-01. [4] S. Agarwal, H. Farid, Y. Gu, M. He, K. Nagano, and H. Li. Protecting world leaders against deep fakes. In CVPR workshops, volume 1, page 38, 2019. [5] S. Aneja, L. Markhasin, and M. Nießner. Tafim: Targeted adversarial attacks against facial image manipulations. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XIV, pages 58–75. Springer, 2022. [6] S. Bond-Taylor, A. Leach, Y. Long, and C. G. Willcocks. Deep generative modelling: A comparative review of vaes, gans, normalizing flows, energy-based and autoregressive models. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2021. [7] L. Buitinck, G. Louppe, M. Blondel, F. Pedregosa, A. Mueller, O. Grisel, V. Niculae, P. Prettenhofer, A. Gramfort, J. Grobler, R. Layton, J. VanderPlas, A. Joly, B. Holt, and G. Varoquaux. API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project. In ECML PKDD Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning, pages 108–122, 2013. [8] Y. Choi, M. Choi, M. Kim, J.-W. Ha, S. Kim, and J. Choo. Stargan: Unified generative adversarial networks for multi-domain image-to-image translation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8789–8797, 2018. [9] Y. Choi, Y. Uh, J. Yoo, and J.-W. Ha. Stargan v2: Diverse image synthesis for multiple domains. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8188–8197, 2020. [10] U. A. Ciftci, I. Demir, and L. Yin. Fakecatcher: Detection of synthetic portrait videos using biological signals. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2020. [11] K. T. Co, L. Muñoz-González, L. Kanthan, B. Glocker, and E. C. Lupu. Universal adversarial robustness of texture and shape-biased models. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pages 799–803. IEEE, 2021. [12] Z. He, W. Zuo, M. Kan, S. Shan, and X. Chen. Attgan: Facial attribute editing by only changing what you want. IEEE transactions on image processing, 28(11):5464– 5478, 2019. [13] T. Karras, S. Laine, and T. Aila. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4401–4410, 2019. [14] T. Karras, S. Laine, M. Aittala, J. Hellsten, J. Lehtinen, and T. Aila. Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8110–8119, 2020. [15] X. Li, S. Zhang, J. Hu, L. Cao, X. Hong, X. Mao, F. Huang, Y. Wu, and R. Ji. Image-to-image translation via hierarchical style disentanglement. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8639–8648, 2021. [16] Y. Li, M.-C. Chang, and S. Lyu. In ictu oculi: Exposing ai created fake videos by detecting eye blinking. In 2018 IEEE international workshop on information forensics and security (WIFS), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2018. [17] Y. Li, X. Yang, B. Wu, and S. Lyu. Hiding faces in plain sight: Disrupting ai face synthesis with adversarial perturbations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.09288, 2019. [18] S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. [19] X. Luo, R. Zhan, H. Chang, F. Yang, and P. Milanfar. Distortion agnostic deep watermarking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 13548–13557, 2020. [20] A. Madry, A. Makelov, L. Schmidt, D. Tsipras, and A. Vladu. Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06083, 2017. [21] F. Marra, D. Gragnaniello, D. Cozzolino, and L. Verdoliva. Detection of gangenerated fake images over social networks. In 2018 IEEE conference on multimedia information processing and retrieval (MIPR), pages 384–389. IEEE, 2018. [22] F. Matern, C. Riess, and M. Stamminger. Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations. In 2019 IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW), pages 83–92. IEEE, 2019. [23] T. T. Nguyen, Q. V. H. Nguyen, D. T. Nguyen, D. T. Nguyen, T. Huynh-The, S. Nahavandi, T. T. Nguyen, Q.-V. Pham, and C. M. Nguyen. Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 223:103525, 2022. [24] I. Perov, D. Gao, N. Chervoniy, K. Liu, S. Marangonda, C. Umé, M. Dpfks, C. S. Facenheim, L. RP, J. Jiang, et al. Deepfacelab: Integrated, flexible and extensible face-swapping framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.05535, 2020. [25] A. Pumarola, A. Agudo, A. M. Martinez, A. Sanfeliu, and F. Moreno-Noguer. Ganimation: Anatomically-aware facial animation from a single image. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 818–833, 2018. [26] E. Richardson, Y. Alaluf, O. Patashnik, Y. Nitzan, Y. Azar, S. Shapiro, and D. Cohen-Or. Encoding in style: a stylegan encoder for image-to-image translation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2287–2296, 2021. [27] N. Ruiz, S. A. Bargal, and S. Sclaroff. Disrupting deepfakes: Adversarial attacks against conditional image translation networks and facial manipulation systems. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020 Workshops: Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part IV 16, pages 236–251. Springer, 2020. [28] E. Segalis and E. Galili. Ogan: Disrupting deepfakes with an adversarial attack that survives training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.12247, 2020. [29] A. Shafahi, M. Najibi, Z. Xu, J. Dickerson, L. S. Davis, and T. Goldstein. Universal adversarial training. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, pages 5636–5643, 2020. [30] A. Shrikumar, P. Greenside, A. Shcherbina, and A. Kundaje. Not just a black box: Learning important features through propagating activation differences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01713, 2016. [31] P. Sun, Y. Li, H. Qi, and S. Lyu. Landmark breaker: obstructing deepfake by disturbing landmark extraction. In 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2020. [32] M. Tancik, B. Mildenhall, and R. Ng. Stegastamp: Invisible hyperlinks in physical photographs. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2117–2126, 2020. [33] R. Tolosana, R. Vera-Rodriguez, J. Fierrez, A. Morales, and J. Ortega-Garcia. An Introduction to Digital Face Manipulation, pages 3–26. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022. [34] C. Yang, L. Ding, Y. Chen, and H. Li. Defending against gan-based deepfake attacks via transformation-aware adversarial faces. In 2021 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2021. [35] S. Yang, L. Jiang, Z. Liu, and C. C. Loy. Styleganex: Stylegan-based manipulation beyond cropped aligned faces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06146, 2023. [36] X. Yang, Y. Li, and S. Lyu. Exposing deep fakes using inconsistent head poses. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 8261–8265. IEEE, 2019. [37] Y. Yang, C. Liang, H. He, X. Cao, and N. Z. Gong. Faceguard: Proactive deepfake detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.05673, 2021. [38] C.-Y. Yeh, H.-W. Chen, S.-L. Tsai, and S.-D. Wang. Disrupting image-translationbased deepfake algorithms with adversarial attacks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops, pages 53–62, 2020. [39] J. Zhu, R. Kaplan, J. Johnson, and L. Fei-Fei. Hidden: Hiding data with deep networks. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 657–672, 2018.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊管理學系
110356024
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110356024
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 郁方zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yu, Fangen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 郭丞堯zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Guo, Cheng-Yaoen_US
dc.creator (作者) 郭丞堯zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Guo, Cheng-Yaoen_US
dc.date (日期) 2024en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Feb-2024 10:56:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Feb-2024 10:56:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Feb-2024 10:56:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0110356024en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149467-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 資訊管理學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 110356024zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 深度偽造技術的應用已趨於成熟，並在網路上廣泛傳播。這項技術的濫用會導致人們的隱私與安全受到侵害。為應對這一威脅，我們引入了一種新的防禦策略，稱為“糖衣毒藥”。該方法涉及在生成模型的學習過程中有策略地擾動潛在向量。通過設計，我們的方法旨在將視覺效果視為“毒藥”，引發故意的干擾，同時最小化重建損失充當“糖衣”，誤導深度偽造模型。這種雙重目的的策略能有效地抵禦深度偽造攻擊，並提高被檢測率。我們提出了一種系統性的機制，來生成影片補丁，以減輕與深度偽造相關的風險，並在特定的深度偽造人臉交換應用背景下實施和驗證我們的方法。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The application of deepfake face-swapping technology has matured and become widespread on the internet, posing a significant threat to application security and privacy. In response to this growing concern, we introduce a novel defense strategy named "sugar-coated poison." This approach involves strategically perturbing latent vectors during the learning process of generative models. By design, our method aims to treat visual effects as the "poison," inducing intentional disruptions, while minimizing reconstruction loss acts as the "sugar," misleading the deepfake model. This dual-purpose strategy effectively defends against deepfake attacks. We present a systematic mechanism for generating video patches to mitigate the risks associated with deepfake manipulation, implementing and validating our approach specifically in the context of deepfake face-swapping applications.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 1 Introduction 1 2 Related Work 3 2.1 Generative Models 3 2.2 Deepfake Creation 3 2.3 Deepfake Detection 4 2.4 Deepfake Prevention 5 3 Methodology 6 3.1 Sugar-Coated Poison 6 3.2 Target Latent Selection 8 3.2.1 SHAP-based Latent Selection 8 3.2.2 Grid Search Latent Selection 11 3.3 Perturbation Generation 14 3.3.1 Single-image Perturbation 15 3.3.2 Universal Adversarial Perturbation 16 3.4 Video Protection 18 4 Experiments 20 4.1 Target Latent Selection 21 4.1.1 SHAP-based Explainer 21 4.1.2 Grid Search 22 4.2 Perturbation Generation 23 4.3 Video Protection 27 5 Conclusions 29 Reference 31zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2618611 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110356024en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 毒藥防禦zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 深度偽造zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 對抗例攻擊zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Poison defenseen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Deepfakeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Adversarial attacken_US
dc.title (題名) 深度偽造的投毒防禦技術研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Poison Defense on Deepfake Attacksen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [1] Dlib library. http://dlib.net/. Accessed: 2023-12-01. [2] Faceswap. https://github.com/deepfakes/faceswap. Accessed: 2023-12-01. [3] Ffmpeg. https://ffmpeg.org/. Accessed: 2023-12-01. [4] S. Agarwal, H. Farid, Y. Gu, M. He, K. Nagano, and H. Li. Protecting world leaders against deep fakes. In CVPR workshops, volume 1, page 38, 2019. [5] S. Aneja, L. Markhasin, and M. Nießner. Tafim: Targeted adversarial attacks against facial image manipulations. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XIV, pages 58–75. Springer, 2022. [6] S. Bond-Taylor, A. Leach, Y. Long, and C. G. Willcocks. Deep generative modelling: A comparative review of vaes, gans, normalizing flows, energy-based and autoregressive models. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2021. [7] L. Buitinck, G. Louppe, M. Blondel, F. Pedregosa, A. Mueller, O. Grisel, V. Niculae, P. Prettenhofer, A. Gramfort, J. Grobler, R. Layton, J. VanderPlas, A. Joly, B. Holt, and G. Varoquaux. API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project. In ECML PKDD Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning, pages 108–122, 2013. [8] Y. Choi, M. Choi, M. Kim, J.-W. Ha, S. Kim, and J. Choo. Stargan: Unified generative adversarial networks for multi-domain image-to-image translation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8789–8797, 2018. [9] Y. Choi, Y. Uh, J. Yoo, and J.-W. Ha. Stargan v2: Diverse image synthesis for multiple domains. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8188–8197, 2020. [10] U. A. Ciftci, I. Demir, and L. Yin. Fakecatcher: Detection of synthetic portrait videos using biological signals. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2020. [11] K. T. Co, L. Muñoz-González, L. Kanthan, B. Glocker, and E. C. Lupu. Universal adversarial robustness of texture and shape-biased models. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pages 799–803. IEEE, 2021. [12] Z. He, W. Zuo, M. Kan, S. Shan, and X. Chen. Attgan: Facial attribute editing by only changing what you want. IEEE transactions on image processing, 28(11):5464– 5478, 2019. [13] T. Karras, S. Laine, and T. Aila. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4401–4410, 2019. [14] T. Karras, S. Laine, M. Aittala, J. Hellsten, J. Lehtinen, and T. Aila. Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8110–8119, 2020. [15] X. Li, S. Zhang, J. Hu, L. Cao, X. Hong, X. Mao, F. Huang, Y. Wu, and R. Ji. Image-to-image translation via hierarchical style disentanglement. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8639–8648, 2021. [16] Y. Li, M.-C. Chang, and S. Lyu. In ictu oculi: Exposing ai created fake videos by detecting eye blinking. In 2018 IEEE international workshop on information forensics and security (WIFS), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2018. [17] Y. Li, X. Yang, B. Wu, and S. Lyu. Hiding faces in plain sight: Disrupting ai face synthesis with adversarial perturbations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.09288, 2019. [18] S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. [19] X. Luo, R. Zhan, H. Chang, F. Yang, and P. Milanfar. Distortion agnostic deep watermarking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 13548–13557, 2020. [20] A. Madry, A. Makelov, L. Schmidt, D. Tsipras, and A. Vladu. Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06083, 2017. [21] F. Marra, D. Gragnaniello, D. Cozzolino, and L. Verdoliva. Detection of gangenerated fake images over social networks. In 2018 IEEE conference on multimedia information processing and retrieval (MIPR), pages 384–389. IEEE, 2018. [22] F. Matern, C. Riess, and M. Stamminger. Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations. In 2019 IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW), pages 83–92. IEEE, 2019. [23] T. T. Nguyen, Q. V. H. Nguyen, D. T. Nguyen, D. T. Nguyen, T. Huynh-The, S. Nahavandi, T. T. Nguyen, Q.-V. Pham, and C. M. Nguyen. Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 223:103525, 2022. [24] I. Perov, D. Gao, N. Chervoniy, K. Liu, S. Marangonda, C. Umé, M. Dpfks, C. S. Facenheim, L. RP, J. Jiang, et al. Deepfacelab: Integrated, flexible and extensible face-swapping framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.05535, 2020. [25] A. Pumarola, A. Agudo, A. M. Martinez, A. Sanfeliu, and F. Moreno-Noguer. Ganimation: Anatomically-aware facial animation from a single image. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 818–833, 2018. [26] E. Richardson, Y. Alaluf, O. Patashnik, Y. Nitzan, Y. Azar, S. Shapiro, and D. Cohen-Or. Encoding in style: a stylegan encoder for image-to-image translation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2287–2296, 2021. [27] N. Ruiz, S. A. Bargal, and S. Sclaroff. Disrupting deepfakes: Adversarial attacks against conditional image translation networks and facial manipulation systems. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020 Workshops: Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part IV 16, pages 236–251. Springer, 2020. [28] E. Segalis and E. Galili. Ogan: Disrupting deepfakes with an adversarial attack that survives training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.12247, 2020. [29] A. Shafahi, M. Najibi, Z. Xu, J. Dickerson, L. S. Davis, and T. Goldstein. Universal adversarial training. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, pages 5636–5643, 2020. [30] A. Shrikumar, P. Greenside, A. Shcherbina, and A. Kundaje. Not just a black box: Learning important features through propagating activation differences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01713, 2016. [31] P. Sun, Y. Li, H. Qi, and S. Lyu. Landmark breaker: obstructing deepfake by disturbing landmark extraction. In 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2020. [32] M. Tancik, B. Mildenhall, and R. Ng. Stegastamp: Invisible hyperlinks in physical photographs. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2117–2126, 2020. [33] R. Tolosana, R. Vera-Rodriguez, J. Fierrez, A. Morales, and J. Ortega-Garcia. An Introduction to Digital Face Manipulation, pages 3–26. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022. [34] C. Yang, L. Ding, Y. Chen, and H. Li. Defending against gan-based deepfake attacks via transformation-aware adversarial faces. In 2021 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2021. [35] S. Yang, L. Jiang, Z. Liu, and C. C. Loy. Styleganex: Stylegan-based manipulation beyond cropped aligned faces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06146, 2023. [36] X. Yang, Y. Li, and S. Lyu. Exposing deep fakes using inconsistent head poses. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 8261–8265. IEEE, 2019. [37] Y. Yang, C. Liang, H. He, X. Cao, and N. Z. Gong. Faceguard: Proactive deepfake detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.05673, 2021. [38] C.-Y. Yeh, H.-W. Chen, S.-L. Tsai, and S.-D. Wang. Disrupting image-translationbased deepfake algorithms with adversarial attacks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops, pages 53–62, 2020. [39] J. Zhu, R. Kaplan, J. Johnson, and L. Fei-Fei. Hidden: Hiding data with deep networks. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 657–672, 2018.zh_TW