Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 德國締約上過失理論之發展
其他題名 The Development of Culpa in Contrahendo in German
作者 向明恩
Hsiang, Ming-en
貢獻者 法學院
關鍵詞 締約上過失; 侵權責任; 前契約債之關係; 信賴原則; 違反前契約義務; 第三人締約上過失責任; 德國新債法
Culpa in contrahendo; Torts; Preliminary obligation; Principle of reliance; Breach of preliminary contractual duty; Duty of culpa in contrahendo on third party; German law of obligations act
日期 2009-06
上傳時間 21-Feb-2024 15:21:59 (UTC+8)
摘要 德國締約上過失制度,百餘年來歷經學說與判例交互影響,終於在2002年德國新修訂之債法中予以明文化。本文乃以宏觀角度出發,探究德國締約上過失從未明文化進入明文化之發展歷程,並逐一分析學說上對於締約過失責任所提出之理論依據,以釐清締約過失責任之建構基礎,其中又以學者巴勒史泰德(Ballerstedt)氏所提出之信賴理論,對締約上過失責任在縱向與橫向發展之建構最具影響力,甚至爲具體明文化之締約上過失規範所徵引。除探究學說上相關見解外,並整理相關實務判決,以具體呈現學說與實務交互運作之情形。此外,並解構明文化之當事人與第三人締約上過失責任之構成要件與其法律效果。文末就德國締約上過失責任之理論與法制檢視我國締約過失之相關規範,以嘗試重新型塑我國締約上過失之制度。
The doctrine of culpa in contrahendo in Germany had previously come to be recognized praeter legem. On 1 January 2002 the Modernization of the German Law of Obligations Act entered into force. The living law of culpa in cotrahendo reflects in the wording of the code. Of course, it has to be acknowledged that the courts und the scholars established the doctrine of culpa in contrahendo. This article begins with analysis of the development and the legal theory of culpa in contrahendo. As a result, the culpa in cotrahendo is based on the principle of reliance. Furthermore, this article explains the requirements und legal consequences of die duty of culpa in contrahendo on the other party (§ 311 Ⅱ BGB) und die duty of culpa in contrahendo on the part of third parties (§ 311 Ⅲ BGB). Lastly, the purpose of this article is to compare Taiwanese and German law and to make relevant suggestions.
關聯 臺北大學法學論叢, No.70, pp.1-79
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.6774/TULR.200906.0001
dc.contributor 法學院
dc.creator (作者) 向明恩
dc.creator (作者) Hsiang, Ming-en
dc.date (日期) 2009-06
dc.date.accessioned 21-Feb-2024 15:21:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 21-Feb-2024 15:21:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 21-Feb-2024 15:21:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149983-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 德國締約上過失制度,百餘年來歷經學說與判例交互影響,終於在2002年德國新修訂之債法中予以明文化。本文乃以宏觀角度出發,探究德國締約上過失從未明文化進入明文化之發展歷程,並逐一分析學說上對於締約過失責任所提出之理論依據,以釐清締約過失責任之建構基礎,其中又以學者巴勒史泰德(Ballerstedt)氏所提出之信賴理論,對締約上過失責任在縱向與橫向發展之建構最具影響力,甚至爲具體明文化之締約上過失規範所徵引。除探究學說上相關見解外,並整理相關實務判決,以具體呈現學說與實務交互運作之情形。此外,並解構明文化之當事人與第三人締約上過失責任之構成要件與其法律效果。文末就德國締約上過失責任之理論與法制檢視我國締約過失之相關規範,以嘗試重新型塑我國締約上過失之制度。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The doctrine of culpa in contrahendo in Germany had previously come to be recognized praeter legem. On 1 January 2002 the Modernization of the German Law of Obligations Act entered into force. The living law of culpa in cotrahendo reflects in the wording of the code. Of course, it has to be acknowledged that the courts und the scholars established the doctrine of culpa in contrahendo. This article begins with analysis of the development and the legal theory of culpa in contrahendo. As a result, the culpa in cotrahendo is based on the principle of reliance. Furthermore, this article explains the requirements und legal consequences of die duty of culpa in contrahendo on the other party (§ 311 Ⅱ BGB) und die duty of culpa in contrahendo on the part of third parties (§ 311 Ⅲ BGB). Lastly, the purpose of this article is to compare Taiwanese and German law and to make relevant suggestions.
dc.format.extent 130 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 臺北大學法學論叢, No.70, pp.1-79
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 締約上過失; 侵權責任; 前契約債之關係; 信賴原則; 違反前契約義務; 第三人締約上過失責任; 德國新債法
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Culpa in contrahendo; Torts; Preliminary obligation; Principle of reliance; Breach of preliminary contractual duty; Duty of culpa in contrahendo on third party; German law of obligations act
dc.title (題名) 德國締約上過失理論之發展
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) The Development of Culpa in Contrahendo in German
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6774/TULR.200906.0001
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.6774/TULR.200906.0001