Publications-學位論文
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 非正式空間中的城市共生動態過程：寶藏巖案例
The Dynamics of Urban Symbiosis Processes Within Informal Spaces: The Case of Treasure Hill作者 何子麒
Larkin, Tobias Ho貢獻者 陳虹穎
Chen, Hung-Ying
何子麒
Larkin, Tobias Ho關鍵詞 寶藏巖
城市共生
非正式聚落
Treasure Hill
Urban Symbiosis
Informal Settlement日期 2024 上傳時間 1-Mar-2024 14:18:24 (UTC+8) 摘要 本論文探討台灣台北市寶藏巖的「城市共生」動態。在這個非正式的聚落中，各種不同的利害關係者進行日常維護、合作和社區活化，共同構想並創造所謂的「藝居共生」。本研究嘗試將寶藏巖推動「藝居共生」與城市非正式性和「地方創生」相連結，以理解為什麼「城市共生」會成為寶藏巖不同利害關係者的共同關注？以及，在這個非正式聚落中，不同利害關係人如何理解並經驗「城市共生」？透過一系列質性研究方法，我以三個主題──「活保存」，「管理和治理」與「地方創生」──探討關於寶藏巖文化治理和保存的多元觀點。我主張非正式聚落的生存充滿挑戰。此過程中，寶藏巖居民透過實踐和分享他們的社區傳統和聚落文化，以持續參與於文化治理與成為(被)保存的主體。本論文主要貢獻在於記敘2021年-2023年間，原居民們租約到期，臺北市文化局頒布新使用辦法之多重治理框架協商過程.
This thesis explores the dynamics of “Urban Symbiosis” in Taipei City’s Treasure Hill community. In this informal settlement, various stakeholders engage in daily maintenance, cooperation, and community activation, collectively envisioning and creating what is known as “Artist-Resident Symbiosis”. This study seeks to link the promotion of “Artist-Resident Symbiosis” in Treasure Hill with urban informality literature and “Regional Revitalization” policy, aiming to understand why “Urban Symbiosis” has become a common concern for different stakeholders in Treasure Hill. Additionally, it examines how different stakeholders both understand and experience “Urban Symbiosis” within this informal settlement. Through a series of qualitative research methods, this thesis discusses diverse perspectives on cultural governance and preservation in Treasure Hill, focusing on three themes: “Living Conservation”, “Management and Governance”, and “Community Revitalization”. I argue that the survival of informal settlements is filled with challenges. In this process of survival, Treasure Hill residents continue to participate in cultural governance and become (or are) subjects of preservation by practicing and sharing their community traditions and settlement culture. The main contribution of this thesis lies in narrating the multiple governance framework negotiation processes between original residents whose leases expired between 2021 and 2023 and Taipei City’s Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA), which issued new usage regulations during this period.參考文獻 Aguilar et al. (2003). Globalization, regional development, and mega-city expansion in Latin America: Analyzing Mexico City’s peri-urban hinterland. Cities, 20(1), 3-21. Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), 23–43. Banks et al. (2020). “Urban informality as a site of critical analysis”. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(2), 223–238. Caldeira, T. (2017). Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816658479 Casagrande, M. (2019). From urban acupuncture to the third generation city. In Nature Driven Urbanism (pp.131–153). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26717-9_7 Chang & Chou, P.C. (2020). The influence of the regional revitalization policy on Taiwan’s land planning: Taking Pingtung county township as an example”. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 588(4), 42014–. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042014 Chuang et al. (2021). Examining the key drivers for regional revitalization based upon social network analysis: A case study of Badouzi in Taiwan. Marine Policy, 133, 104754–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104754 Cobbinah, P.B. (2023). The oddity of desiring informality. Dialogues in Human Geography, 0(0), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231191737. De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. Perseus Books Group. El Ouardi & Montambeault, F. (2023). Collectively gardening the urban public space in Mexico City: When informal practices interact with the state. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 47(2), 201–220. Freire-Medeiros, B. (2009). The favela and its touristic transits. Geoforum 40.4, 580–88. Fujimoto, I. (1992). Lessons from Abroad in Rural Community Revitalization: The One Village, One Product Movement in Japan. Community Development Journal, 27(1), 10–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44259233 Giombini, L. (2022). Respect in Conservation Ethics: A Philosophical Inquiry, Studies in Conservation, 67:1-2, 100-108, DOI: 10.1080/00393630.2021.1940797 Glass, R. (1964). London: Aspects of Change. London: MacGibbon & Kee. Gonzalez, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona “in motion”. How urban regeneration “models” travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010374510 Greenbaum, R. & Bondonio, D. (2004). Losing focus: A comparative evaluation of spatially targeted economic revitalization programmes in the US and the EU, Regional Studies, 38(3), 319-334, https://doi.org/10.1080/003434042000211042 Hall, P. & Pfeiffer, U. (2000). Urban future 21: A global agenda for twenty-first century cities (1st ed.). Routledge. Harvey, D. (2006). Paris, capital of modernity. Routledge. Hetherington, K. (2015). Foucault and the Museum. In The International Handbooks of Museum Studies (eds S. Macdonald and H. Rees Leahy). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829059.wbihms102 Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003124450 Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2003). Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge / Eilean Hooper-Greenhill. London ; Routledge, 2003. Print. Hsiao, H. (2022). From squatter settlements to cultural heritage: The preservation and revitalization as “group of buildings” based on the case experience of Treasure Hill Art Village in Taipei City, Taiwan, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 21(2), 644-661, http://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1838910 Inoue et al. (2022). Exploring the impact of depopulation on a country's population geography: Lessons learned from Japan. Population, Space and Place, 28(5), e2543. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2543 Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House. Jou et al. (2016). Gentrification and revanchist urbanism in Taipei? Urban Studies, 53(3), 560-576. Kang, M. (2006). Altered space: Squatting and legitimizing Treasure Hill, Taipei. Presented at Cultural Development Network’s Forum: ‘Artivism: The role of arts in regeneration’. 1-6. Kim, K. & Kim, E.J. (2021). Tourism as a key for regional revitalization?: A quantitative evaluation of tourism zone development in Japan.” Sustainability, 13(13), 7478–. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137478 King, K. (2013). Jane Jacobs and “The need for aged buildings”: Neighbourhood historical development pace and community social relations”. Urban Studies, 50(12), 2,407-2,424. King, R. (2023). Informality as process and the social construction of slums. In Mayne, A. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Modern Slum, Chapter 4 (p.73-84). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190879457.001.0001. Knell, S. (Ed.). (2007). Museums in the material world. Taylor & Francis Group. Lefebvre, H. (1968). The Right to the City (Le Droit à la ville). Anthropos, Paris (1996). Li et al. (2022). A cultural approach to preserving squatter settlements: The case of Treasure Hill village in Taipei, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(4), 460-475, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.2010234. Liu, J. (2022). The impacts of Taiwan’s rural rejuvenation program on rural migration, 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322350, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. Marx et al. (2013). The economics of slums in the developing world. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.27 (4), 187–210. McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking informality: politics, crisis, and the city. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), 89–108. Mo, Y. (2007). Residents occupy Treasure Hill. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2007/01/27/2003346517 Muzaini, H. (2021). Rethinking the living museum concept “from below”, Journal of Cultural Geography, 38:1, 81-101, DOI: 10.1080/08873631.2020.1800320 National Strategic Plan for Regional Revitalization. (2018). National Development Council, Executive Yuan. 1-16 https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzExL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMjQ3NC9mMzY0ZTM0Zi1hMzBiLTQ3ZTgtYWQzMi1jNWE2YWQ2ODIzMGQucGRm&n=TmF0aW9uYWwgU3RyYXRlZ2ljIFBsYW4gZm9yIFJlZ2lvbmFsIFJldml0YWxpemF0aW9uKOaIsOeVpeioiOeVq%2BiLseitr%2BeJiCko5L%2BuKS5wZGY%3D&icon=..pdf Ng, M. K. (2015). Knowledge and power in regenerating lived space in Treasure Hill, Taipei 1960s-2010: From squatter settlement to a co-living artist village. Planning Perspectives, 30(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2014.934711 Osamu, S. (May 2019). Interview with Akiko Ito: Director General, Secretariat of the Headquarters for Overcoming Population Decline and Vitalizing Local Economy in Japan, Public Relations Office, Government of Japan. Regional Revitalization: National Strategic Plan for Regional Revitalization. (2019). National Development Council, Executive Yuan. 1-26. https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzExL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMjQ3NC9lYmY2MDYxNS01ZDMwLTQxNDYtOGFlMS0wMTVhNDVmZDhkMDgucGRm&n=5Zyw5pa55Ym155Sf5ZyL5a625oiw55Wl6KiI55Wr57Ch5aCxKOiLseaWh%2BeJiCkxMDgwNjIw54mILnBkZg%3D%3D&icon=..pdf Ren et al. (2020). Effects of the northeast China revitalization strategy on regional economic growth and social development. Chinese Geographical Science, 30(5): 791–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1149-5 Robinson, J. (2011). 2010 urban geography plenary lecture—The travels of urban neoliberalism: Taking stock of the internationalization of urban theory”, Urban Geography, 32(8), 1087-1109, https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.8.1087 Rogelja, I. (2021). The museumification of Treasure Hill: Authenticity, authority and art in a Taiwanese urban village. The China Quarterly, 245, 227-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741020000090 Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press. Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 71, 147–158. Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x Shin et al. (2016). Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East. Urban Studies. Vol.53(3), 455-470. Simone, A. (2010). City life from Dakar to Jakarta. Routledge. Smith, N. (1987). Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(3), 462–465. Su, L. (2019). Going local: Taiwan kicks off regional revitalization effort”. Taiwan Panorama. 台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021). 0911座談會文字稿 (9/11 Symposium Transcript)。 https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story 台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021). 0917座談會文字稿 (9/17 Symposium Transcript)。 https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story 台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021). 1001座談會文字稿 (10/1 Symposium Transcript)。 https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story 台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021). 1128寶藏巖共生聚落居住策略願景論壇文字稿 (1128 Treasure Hill Sustainable Community Residential Strategy Vision Forum Transcript)。 https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story Ulldemolins, J. R. (2014). Culture and authenticity in urban regeneration processes: Place branding in central Barcelona. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 51(14), 3026–3045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013515762 Vasudevan, A. (2015). The makeshift city: Towards a global geography of squatting. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 338-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514531471 Waley, P.T. (2016) Speaking gentrification in the languages of the Global East, Urban Studies, Vol.53(3). 615-625. Watson, S. (Ed.). (2007). Museums and their Communities (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944752 Yang, O. (2003-2010). Taipei Nooks — Living Treasures of the Past 角落台北 ‧ 尋寶徒。 http://nookcity.tw/index.html Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical notes on “gray cities”: The coming of urban apartheid? Planning Theory, 8.1, 88–100. 張之穎（Chang, C.). (2008). 寶藏巖藝術村不只是個高級動物園. 文化研究月報, 120期(09). 49-53. https://doi.org/10.7012/CSM.201109.0049 張立本 （Chang, L.). (2005). 都市治理與社會運動的文化策略：台北市寶藏巖違建運動. 中 外文學, 33(9), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.6637/CWLQ.2005.33(9).109-142 張立本（Chang, L.). (2011). 曲扭的鏡子：寶藏巖的民眾、抗爭者、規劃師、藝術與體制 （上）. 文化研究月報, 122期(11), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.7012/CSM.201111.0057 徐聖情 (Hsu, S.). (2006). 拒絕再做軟柿子，新市府請硬起來。公共論壇。 https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/64075 洪伯邑[等]著 (Hung, P.). (2021). 田野敲敲門 : 現地研究基本功。洪伯邑主編 (初版). 國立臺 灣大學出版中心. 郭淇瑋 （Kuo, C.). (2010). 寶藏巖––藝術介入空間的公共性。小地方新聞網。 廖世璋（Liao, S.). (2014). 後博物館的地方實踐––寶藏巖. 博物館學季刊, 28(2). 35-69. https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.201404_28(2).0002 林倩如（Lin, C.). (2021). 【講座筆記】劉可強╳彭揚凱：寶藏巖十年的省思與展望，續住 與發展會持續對話。步入城市#38。https://ours.org.tw/2021/02/07/lecture38-2/ 劉益誠 (Liu, I.). (2007). 一個柿子不斷變硬的社區抗爭過程 ─ 敬答徐聖情女士。苦勞網。 https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/1195 慕思勉（Mu, S.). (2023). 寶藏巖社區：臺大城鄉基金會三十年：變革中的專業者。 台 灣建築雜誌，Vol.329. https://www.ta-mag.net/ta/News.php?id=2185 宝窩 TREASURE HIVE。(2005-2007)。 http://treasurehive.blogspot.com/ 王志弘（Wang, C.). (2003). 台北市文化治理的性質與轉變，1967-2002。台灣社會研究 季刊，(52)，121-186。https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.200312.0003 衛紅（Wei, H.). (2006). 寶藏巖公社連意識形態也不是。破週報。 http://praxis.tw/archive/post-26.php 游崴（Yu, W.). (2007). 寶藏巖改建爭議未息，部分藝術家持續抗爭中。本文刊登於《典藏 ．今藝術》，172期 。https://neogenova.blogspot.com/2007/02/blog-post.html 臺北國際藝術村/寶藏巖國際藝術村。(2021)。 台北市文化局。 https://culture.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=20994098C3459E18 蟾蜍山煥民新村。(2021)。台北市文化局。 https://culture.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=66A2914C14F403C7 關於藝術村。(2023)。財團法人台北市文化基金會藝術村營運部。 https://www.artistvillage.org/about.php 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
110926028資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110926028 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳虹穎 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Hung-Ying en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 何子麒 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Larkin, Tobias Ho en_US dc.creator (作者) 何子麒 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Larkin, Tobias Ho en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Mar-2024 14:18:24 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Mar-2024 14:18:24 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Mar-2024 14:18:24 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0110926028 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150274 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 110926028 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文探討台灣台北市寶藏巖的「城市共生」動態。在這個非正式的聚落中，各種不同的利害關係者進行日常維護、合作和社區活化，共同構想並創造所謂的「藝居共生」。本研究嘗試將寶藏巖推動「藝居共生」與城市非正式性和「地方創生」相連結，以理解為什麼「城市共生」會成為寶藏巖不同利害關係者的共同關注？以及，在這個非正式聚落中，不同利害關係人如何理解並經驗「城市共生」？透過一系列質性研究方法，我以三個主題──「活保存」，「管理和治理」與「地方創生」──探討關於寶藏巖文化治理和保存的多元觀點。我主張非正式聚落的生存充滿挑戰。此過程中，寶藏巖居民透過實踐和分享他們的社區傳統和聚落文化，以持續參與於文化治理與成為(被)保存的主體。本論文主要貢獻在於記敘2021年-2023年間，原居民們租約到期，臺北市文化局頒布新使用辦法之多重治理框架協商過程. zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis explores the dynamics of “Urban Symbiosis” in Taipei City’s Treasure Hill community. In this informal settlement, various stakeholders engage in daily maintenance, cooperation, and community activation, collectively envisioning and creating what is known as “Artist-Resident Symbiosis”. This study seeks to link the promotion of “Artist-Resident Symbiosis” in Treasure Hill with urban informality literature and “Regional Revitalization” policy, aiming to understand why “Urban Symbiosis” has become a common concern for different stakeholders in Treasure Hill. Additionally, it examines how different stakeholders both understand and experience “Urban Symbiosis” within this informal settlement. Through a series of qualitative research methods, this thesis discusses diverse perspectives on cultural governance and preservation in Treasure Hill, focusing on three themes: “Living Conservation”, “Management and Governance”, and “Community Revitalization”. I argue that the survival of informal settlements is filled with challenges. In this process of survival, Treasure Hill residents continue to participate in cultural governance and become (or are) subjects of preservation by practicing and sharing their community traditions and settlement culture. The main contribution of this thesis lies in narrating the multiple governance framework negotiation processes between original residents whose leases expired between 2021 and 2023 and Taipei City’s Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA), which issued new usage regulations during this period. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Thesis Motivation and Purpose 1 1.2 Background of the Case Study: Treasure Hill 3 1.3 Recapturing Agency 5 1.4 Urban Symbiosis 6 1.5 Thesis Chapter Arrangement 7 Chapter 2: Literature Review 8 2.1 Relevant Literature on Treasure Hill 8 2.2 Governance Strategies and Convergence 8 2.3 The Preservation of Treasure Hill 9 2.4 The Development of Informal Urban Settlements 12 2.4 Gentrification of Informal Settlements in the New Global East 14 2.6 Agency Within Informal Spaces 16 2.7 Revitalization of Villages Through Preservation 17 2.8 Preservation Through Museums 19 Chapter 3: Methods and Data 21 3.1 Research Design 21 3.2 Semi-Structured Interviews 22 3.3 Field Observations 25 3.4 Discourse Analysis 25 Chapter 4: Analysis 27 4.1 Unpacking Relationships and Patterns of “Urban Symbiosis” 27 4.2 Living Conservation 29 4.3 Management and Governance 35 4.4 Community Revitalization 43 Chapter 5: Conclusion 54 5.1 Concluding Remarks 54 5.2 Limitations of the Research 56 5.3 Possible Future Directions 57 References 58 Appendix I 66 zh_TW dc.format.extent 6930600 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110926028 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 寶藏巖 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 城市共生 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 非正式聚落 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Treasure Hill en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Urban Symbiosis en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Informal Settlement en_US dc.title (題名) 非正式空間中的城市共生動態過程：寶藏巖案例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Dynamics of Urban Symbiosis Processes Within Informal Spaces: The Case of Treasure Hill en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aguilar et al. (2003). Globalization, regional development, and mega-city expansion in Latin America: Analyzing Mexico City’s peri-urban hinterland. Cities, 20(1), 3-21. Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), 23–43. Banks et al. (2020). “Urban informality as a site of critical analysis”. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(2), 223–238. Caldeira, T. (2017). Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816658479 Casagrande, M. (2019). From urban acupuncture to the third generation city. In Nature Driven Urbanism (pp.131–153). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26717-9_7 Chang & Chou, P.C. (2020). The influence of the regional revitalization policy on Taiwan’s land planning: Taking Pingtung county township as an example”. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 588(4), 42014–. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042014 Chuang et al. (2021). Examining the key drivers for regional revitalization based upon social network analysis: A case study of Badouzi in Taiwan. Marine Policy, 133, 104754–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104754 Cobbinah, P.B. (2023). The oddity of desiring informality. Dialogues in Human Geography, 0(0), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231191737. De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. Perseus Books Group. El Ouardi & Montambeault, F. (2023). Collectively gardening the urban public space in Mexico City: When informal practices interact with the state. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 47(2), 201–220. Freire-Medeiros, B. (2009). The favela and its touristic transits. Geoforum 40.4, 580–88. Fujimoto, I. (1992). Lessons from Abroad in Rural Community Revitalization: The One Village, One Product Movement in Japan. Community Development Journal, 27(1), 10–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44259233 Giombini, L. (2022). Respect in Conservation Ethics: A Philosophical Inquiry, Studies in Conservation, 67:1-2, 100-108, DOI: 10.1080/00393630.2021.1940797 Glass, R. (1964). London: Aspects of Change. London: MacGibbon & Kee. Gonzalez, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona “in motion”. How urban regeneration “models” travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010374510 Greenbaum, R. & Bondonio, D. (2004). Losing focus: A comparative evaluation of spatially targeted economic revitalization programmes in the US and the EU, Regional Studies, 38(3), 319-334, https://doi.org/10.1080/003434042000211042 Hall, P. & Pfeiffer, U. (2000). Urban future 21: A global agenda for twenty-first century cities (1st ed.). Routledge. Harvey, D. (2006). Paris, capital of modernity. Routledge. Hetherington, K. (2015). Foucault and the Museum. In The International Handbooks of Museum Studies (eds S. Macdonald and H. Rees Leahy). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829059.wbihms102 Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003124450 Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2003). Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge / Eilean Hooper-Greenhill. London ; Routledge, 2003. Print. Hsiao, H. (2022). From squatter settlements to cultural heritage: The preservation and revitalization as “group of buildings” based on the case experience of Treasure Hill Art Village in Taipei City, Taiwan, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 21(2), 644-661, http://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1838910 Inoue et al. (2022). Exploring the impact of depopulation on a country's population geography: Lessons learned from Japan. Population, Space and Place, 28(5), e2543. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2543 Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House. Jou et al. (2016). Gentrification and revanchist urbanism in Taipei? Urban Studies, 53(3), 560-576. Kang, M. (2006). Altered space: Squatting and legitimizing Treasure Hill, Taipei. Presented at Cultural Development Network’s Forum: ‘Artivism: The role of arts in regeneration’. 1-6. Kim, K. & Kim, E.J. (2021). Tourism as a key for regional revitalization?: A quantitative evaluation of tourism zone development in Japan.” Sustainability, 13(13), 7478–. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137478 King, K. (2013). Jane Jacobs and “The need for aged buildings”: Neighbourhood historical development pace and community social relations”. Urban Studies, 50(12), 2,407-2,424. King, R. (2023). Informality as process and the social construction of slums. In Mayne, A. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Modern Slum, Chapter 4 (p.73-84). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190879457.001.0001. Knell, S. (Ed.). (2007). Museums in the material world. Taylor & Francis Group. Lefebvre, H. (1968). The Right to the City (Le Droit à la ville). Anthropos, Paris (1996). Li et al. (2022). A cultural approach to preserving squatter settlements: The case of Treasure Hill village in Taipei, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(4), 460-475, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.2010234. Liu, J. (2022). The impacts of Taiwan’s rural rejuvenation program on rural migration, 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322350, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. Marx et al. (2013). The economics of slums in the developing world. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.27 (4), 187–210. McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking informality: politics, crisis, and the city. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), 89–108. Mo, Y. (2007). Residents occupy Treasure Hill. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2007/01/27/2003346517 Muzaini, H. (2021). Rethinking the living museum concept “from below”, Journal of Cultural Geography, 38:1, 81-101, DOI: 10.1080/08873631.2020.1800320 National Strategic Plan for Regional Revitalization. (2018). National Development Council, Executive Yuan. 1-16 https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzExL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMjQ3NC9mMzY0ZTM0Zi1hMzBiLTQ3ZTgtYWQzMi1jNWE2YWQ2ODIzMGQucGRm&n=TmF0aW9uYWwgU3RyYXRlZ2ljIFBsYW4gZm9yIFJlZ2lvbmFsIFJldml0YWxpemF0aW9uKOaIsOeVpeioiOeVq%2BiLseitr%2BeJiCko5L%2BuKS5wZGY%3D&icon=..pdf Ng, M. K. (2015). Knowledge and power in regenerating lived space in Treasure Hill, Taipei 1960s-2010: From squatter settlement to a co-living artist village. Planning Perspectives, 30(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2014.934711 Osamu, S. (May 2019). Interview with Akiko Ito: Director General, Secretariat of the Headquarters for Overcoming Population Decline and Vitalizing Local Economy in Japan, Public Relations Office, Government of Japan. Regional Revitalization: National Strategic Plan for Regional Revitalization. (2019). National Development Council, Executive Yuan. 1-26. https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzExL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMjQ3NC9lYmY2MDYxNS01ZDMwLTQxNDYtOGFlMS0wMTVhNDVmZDhkMDgucGRm&n=5Zyw5pa55Ym155Sf5ZyL5a625oiw55Wl6KiI55Wr57Ch5aCxKOiLseaWh%2BeJiCkxMDgwNjIw54mILnBkZg%3D%3D&icon=..pdf Ren et al. (2020). Effects of the northeast China revitalization strategy on regional economic growth and social development. Chinese Geographical Science, 30(5): 791–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1149-5 Robinson, J. (2011). 2010 urban geography plenary lecture—The travels of urban neoliberalism: Taking stock of the internationalization of urban theory”, Urban Geography, 32(8), 1087-1109, https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.8.1087 Rogelja, I. (2021). The museumification of Treasure Hill: Authenticity, authority and art in a Taiwanese urban village. The China Quarterly, 245, 227-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741020000090 Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press. Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 71, 147–158. Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x Shin et al. (2016). Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East. Urban Studies. Vol.53(3), 455-470. Simone, A. (2010). City life from Dakar to Jakarta. Routledge. Smith, N. (1987). Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(3), 462–465. Su, L. (2019). Going local: Taiwan kicks off regional revitalization effort”. Taiwan Panorama. 台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021). 0911座談會文字稿 (9/11 Symposium Transcript)。 https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story 台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021). 0917座談會文字稿 (9/17 Symposium Transcript)。 https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story 台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021). 1001座談會文字稿 (10/1 Symposium Transcript)。 https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story 台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021). 1128寶藏巖共生聚落居住策略願景論壇文字稿 (1128 Treasure Hill Sustainable Community Residential Strategy Vision Forum Transcript)。 https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story Ulldemolins, J. R. (2014). Culture and authenticity in urban regeneration processes: Place branding in central Barcelona. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 51(14), 3026–3045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013515762 Vasudevan, A. (2015). The makeshift city: Towards a global geography of squatting. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 338-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514531471 Waley, P.T. (2016) Speaking gentrification in the languages of the Global East, Urban Studies, Vol.53(3). 615-625. Watson, S. (Ed.). (2007). Museums and their Communities (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944752 Yang, O. (2003-2010). Taipei Nooks — Living Treasures of the Past 角落台北 ‧ 尋寶徒。 http://nookcity.tw/index.html Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical notes on “gray cities”: The coming of urban apartheid? Planning Theory, 8.1, 88–100. 張之穎（Chang, C.). (2008). 寶藏巖藝術村不只是個高級動物園. 文化研究月報, 120期(09). 49-53. https://doi.org/10.7012/CSM.201109.0049 張立本 （Chang, L.). (2005). 都市治理與社會運動的文化策略：台北市寶藏巖違建運動. 中 外文學, 33(9), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.6637/CWLQ.2005.33(9).109-142 張立本（Chang, L.). (2011). 曲扭的鏡子：寶藏巖的民眾、抗爭者、規劃師、藝術與體制 （上）. 文化研究月報, 122期(11), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.7012/CSM.201111.0057 徐聖情 (Hsu, S.). (2006). 拒絕再做軟柿子，新市府請硬起來。公共論壇。 https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/64075 洪伯邑[等]著 (Hung, P.). (2021). 田野敲敲門 : 現地研究基本功。洪伯邑主編 (初版). 國立臺 灣大學出版中心. 郭淇瑋 （Kuo, C.). (2010). 寶藏巖––藝術介入空間的公共性。小地方新聞網。 廖世璋（Liao, S.). (2014). 後博物館的地方實踐––寶藏巖. 博物館學季刊, 28(2). 35-69. https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.201404_28(2).0002 林倩如（Lin, C.). (2021). 【講座筆記】劉可強╳彭揚凱：寶藏巖十年的省思與展望，續住 與發展會持續對話。步入城市#38。https://ours.org.tw/2021/02/07/lecture38-2/ 劉益誠 (Liu, I.). (2007). 一個柿子不斷變硬的社區抗爭過程 ─ 敬答徐聖情女士。苦勞網。 https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/1195 慕思勉（Mu, S.). (2023). 寶藏巖社區：臺大城鄉基金會三十年：變革中的專業者。 台 灣建築雜誌，Vol.329. https://www.ta-mag.net/ta/News.php?id=2185 宝窩 TREASURE HIVE。(2005-2007)。 http://treasurehive.blogspot.com/ 王志弘（Wang, C.). (2003). 台北市文化治理的性質與轉變，1967-2002。台灣社會研究 季刊，(52)，121-186。https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.200312.0003 衛紅（Wei, H.). (2006). 寶藏巖公社連意識形態也不是。破週報。 http://praxis.tw/archive/post-26.php 游崴（Yu, W.). (2007). 寶藏巖改建爭議未息，部分藝術家持續抗爭中。本文刊登於《典藏 ．今藝術》，172期 。https://neogenova.blogspot.com/2007/02/blog-post.html 臺北國際藝術村/寶藏巖國際藝術村。(2021)。 台北市文化局。 https://culture.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=20994098C3459E18 蟾蜍山煥民新村。(2021)。台北市文化局。 https://culture.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=66A2914C14F403C7 關於藝術村。(2023)。財團法人台北市文化基金會藝術村營運部。 https://www.artistvillage.org/about.php zh_TW
