| dc.contributor | 法科所 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 王曉丹 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Wang, Hsiao-tan | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2023-06 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 8-May-2024 10:25:13 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 8-May-2024 10:25:13 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 8-May-2024 10:25:13 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151119 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 原住民族要實現自治，法律會是阻力還是助力？過去有關原住民族法律動員的文獻，多數認為法律的程序和語言限制了原住民的表達，甚至造成部落分裂，對於原住民族自治運動而言，法律通常被視為阻力。然而，這些研究未考慮在動員過程中行動者的法意識變化，尤其是如何透過與法律的互動，重組個人與集體、部落與國家之間的主體關係。研究者雖討論了司法作為立法槓桿以及構成性的作用，但並未說明挑戰不平等權力結構的關鍵或機制。本文以知本光電案為個案研究，說明原住民族的法律動員方案，而能突破既有的學術成果。突破的方案為，透過諮商同意權的行使，族人與部落建構出得以與現代法交流的集體性之主體位置，並以此展現既有討論所未述及的原住民集體能動力。本文描繪了三個主體概念與一個主體實踐，即收束道德爭議的策略主體、自建自治的交疊管轄主體、國家行政之外的越界主體，以及實踐上述三個主體概念的政治主體。這些主體能動力的建構有助於族人與部落重新「定位」自治的出發點（自我）、目的地（自治）與路線（實踐）。台灣雖然尚未通過任何原住民族自治法規，族人或部落若能回歸到上述集體性主體對內和對外的自治表達，將有利於將法律阻力化為助力，促進原住民族自治。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Do indigenous peoples find the law to be an impediment or an asset in achieving self-government? Past literature on indigenous legal mobilization often suggests that legal procedures and language constrain indigenous expression and may even lead to tribal divisions. For indigenous self-government movements, the law is often viewed as a hindrance. However, these studies often do not consider how the legal consciousness of activists changes during the mobilization process, particularly how interactions with the law can reshape individual and collective subjectivities, as well as the relationships between tribes and the state. Researchers have discussed the judicial role as a legislative lever and its constitutive function, but they have not adequately explained the key mechanisms to challenge unequal power structures. This article, using the Katratripulr Solar Case as a case study, elucidates indigenous legal mobilization strategies that surpass existing academic findings. The breakthrough lies in the exercise of the right to consultation and consent, through which indigenous people and tribes construct a collective subject position that allows for engagement with modern law, thereby showcasing indigenous agency. This article delineates three subject concepts and one subject practice: the strategic subject that reins in moral disputes, the overlapping jurisdiction subject for self-built autonomy, the transboundary subject beyond state administration, and the political subject practicing these three subject concepts. The construction of these subject agencies helps indigenous people and tribes "reposition" the starting point (the self), destination (self-government), and route (practice) of self-government. Although Taiwan has yet to pass any indigenous self-government legislation, if indigenous people or tribes can return to the collective subject expressions internally and externally as described above, it will facilitate turning legal impediments into assets and promote indigenous self-government. | |
| dc.format.extent | 136 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 臺灣民主季刊, Vol.20, No.2, pp.29-76 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 原住民族自治; 法律動員; 諮商同意; 主體; 能動力 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Indigenous self-government; Legal mobilization; Consultation and consent; Subjectivity; Agency | |
| dc.title (題名) | 建構多重且有實踐力的主體：從知本光電案看卡大地布的法律動員如何促進原住民族自治？ | |
| dc.title (題名) | Constructing Multiple and Practicable Subjects: How Does Legal Mobilization Promote Indigenous Self-Government? A Case Study of the Katratripulr Solar Case | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
