學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 待嫁／不嫁的女兒： 未離家單身女性的日常媒體實踐
Unmarried Daughters: Everyday Media Practice of Single Females Who Live with Parents作者 徐璿琇
Hsu, Hsuan-Hsiu貢獻者 王淑美
Wang, Su-Mei
徐璿琇
Hsu, Hsuan-Hsiu關鍵詞 日常生活
媒體實踐
情感勞動
性別
婚姻
everyday life
media practices
emotional labor
gender
marriage日期 2015 上傳時間 3-Jun-2024 11:47:19 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究欲探究未離家的年輕單身女性日常生活，並聚焦於她們日常生活中的媒體實踐，了解她們如何藉由使用傳播科技，克服身處於家庭結構中的弱勢地位，並跨越地理疆域、建構私人空間、隔絕家人窺視，再進一步地動搖家庭科層制度，尋找使家庭權力再重新分配的機會。 本研究以「使用者日記」和「深度訪談」，試圖分析這群未離家的單身女性如何運行她們的日常生活，並分別以四個層面進行分析：家庭勞務與資源分配的不均、家庭結構之下強化且綁定的情感勞動、傳播科技帶來的逃逸或制約，以及華人家庭共同想像的轉變所帶來的影響。 這四個部分，將分別對應這些女兒們的日常生活：探索物質基礎與身體勞動的關係、家庭結構下女兒是如何承擔了大量的情感勞動、傳播科技在其中所扮演的角色以及其所帶來的效果，最後是華人家庭想像逐漸崩解的焦慮。 本研究將從這四個角度出發，進一步拆解家庭的權力關係是如何作用於女兒們身上，使她們展現出如今的日常生活型態；並進一步揭示這些來自家庭的影響，遠不止存在於她們現在的居住空間、或與他人實體會面的關係中，更會隨著傳播科技延伸至外部，也會隨著情感勞動的內化，每時每刻動搖著她們；而她們身處這樣複雜的權力結構之中，又是如何應對。
This study aims to explore the daily lives of young single women who have not left their families, and focuses on their everyday media practices to understand how they use communication technologies to overcome their disadvantageous position in the family structure, cross geographical boundaries, construct private spaces, isolate themselves from family members' peeping eyes, and challenge the hierarchical system by searching of opportunities to redistribute power in the family. Through 'media practice diaries' and 'in-depth interviews', this study attempts to analyze how these daughters run their daily lives at four levels: the unequal distribution of domestic labor and resources, the emotional labor that is reinforced and bonded under the family structure, the escape or constraints created by communication technologies, and the impact of the changing imagination of the Chinese family. Each of the four sections will address the daily lives of the daughters: exploring the relationship between material bases and physical labor, how the daughters have taken on a great deal of emotional labor under the family structure, the role of communication technology and its effects, and lastly, the anxiety of the disintegration of the Chinese family imagination. From these four perspectives, this study will further dismantle how the domestic authority acts on the daughters to cause their daily life patterns, revealing that these influences are not only reflected in their current living spaces or physical relationships with others, but also extended through communication technologies. Moreover, with internalized emotional labor, these influences also affect them in a near-pervasive way.參考文獻 王君琦（2012）。〈現代戀愛與傳統家庭的倫理衝突：從臺語電影家庭倫理文藝愛情類型看 1950-1960 年代愛情、婚姻、家庭的道德想像〉，《應用倫理評論》，53：57-81。 王淑美（2014）。〈傳播科技與生活韻律──關於研究方法的探討〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，4(1)：23-43。 方念萱（2005）。《性別與傳播科技研究再探：以女性退用／續用網際網路個案為起點的研究》。（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC92-2412-H-004-011）。臺北：政治大學新聞系。 朱瑞玲、章英華（2001年7月）。〈華人社會的家庭倫理與家人互動：文化及社會的變遷效果〉，「華人家庭動態資料庫學術研討會」，台北市南港區。 吳筱玫（2003）。《網路傳播概論》。台北：智勝文化。 李美枝、鍾秋玉（1996）。〈性別與性別角色分析論〉，《本土心理學研究》，6: 260-299。 呂美頤（2000）。《中國社會史論》，周積明、宋德金（編），武漢：湖北教育出版社。 利翠珊、陳富美（2004）。〈配偶親職角色的支持與分工對夫妻恩情的影響〉，《本土心理學研究》，21: 49-83。 林德明、劉兆明（1997）。〈新傳統女性：由個案資料探討女主管的面貌與調適歷程 〉，《中華心理衛生學刊》，10(4): 53-79。 林萬億（2002）。〈台灣的家庭變遷與家庭政策〉，《臺大社會工作學刊》，6: 35-88。 柯裕棻（2008）。《電視國家：一九六０年代日本與美國對台灣的影響 研究成果報告(精簡版)》。（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC 96-2412-H-004-019）。臺北：政治大學新聞系。 施慧玲（2007）。〈民法親屬編之理想家庭圖像--從建構制度保障到寬容多元價值？〉，《月旦民商法雜誌》，17: 19-38。 張玉佩、呂育瑋（2006）。〈網路促進女性解放的可能？從線上遊戲談起〉，《中華傳播學刊》，9: 113-150。 黃光玉（2002年6月）。〈再探「主動的閱聽人」之核心意涵：質化與量化的異同〉，「2002中華傳播學會研討會」，台北縣深坑。 黃光國（1993）。〈人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲〉，楊國樞主編，《中國人的心理》，台北：桂冠：289-318。 黃厚銘（2001）。《虛擬社區中的身分認同》。台灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。 喻維欣（2009）。〈家庭〉，王振寰，瞿海源（編），《社會學與台灣社會（第三版）》，頁 185-209。台北：巨流。 陳玉華、陳信木（2012）。〈初婚年齡的變動趨勢：出生世代、教育程度與省籍背景之間的差異〉，伊慶春、章英華（編），《台灣的社會變遷1985-2005：家庭與婚姻》，頁229-275。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。 陳春富（2011）。〈「家」的夢想：解析房仲電視廣告中的家庭圖像與性別關係〉，《廣告學研究》，35，75-112。 葉光輝(2009)，「台灣民眾的代間交換行為：孝道觀點的探討」，本土心理學研究，第三十一卷，頁97-141。 楊靜利、陳寬政、李大正（2012）。〈近二十年來的家庭結構變遷〉，伊慶春、章英華（編），《台灣的社會變遷1985-2005：家庭與婚姻》，頁2-28。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。 楊國樞、葉光輝、黃曬莉（1989）。〈孝道的社會態度與行為：理論與測量〉，《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》，65: 171-227。 鄭美里（1997）。《女兒圈：台灣女同志的性別、家庭與圈内生活》。台北：女書文化事業有限公司。 孫迺翊（2006）。〈民法親屬編與社會法的交錯領域：一個教學構想的嘗試〉，《台灣本土法學雜誌》，89，87-104。 孫瑞穗（2005）。〈女性主義的空間再思：從女性主義理論化中的性別／空間政治談起〉，《婦研縱橫》，74: 56-63。 趙淑珠（2003）。〈未婚單身女性生活經驗之研究：婚姻意義的反思〉，《教育心理學報》，34(2): 221-246。 畢恆達（2003）。〈家的想像與性別差異〉，龔卓軍，王靜慧譯，《空間詩學》，頁12-19。台北：張老師文化。（原書Bachelard, G. [1994]. The poetics of space (Vol. 330). Boston: Beacon Press.） 盧嵐蘭（2007）。《閱聽人與日常生活》。台北：五南圖書。 Abercrombie, Nicholas & Longhurst, Brian. (1998). Audiences. London: Sage Appadurai, Arjun (1986) Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value. . In Appadurai, Arjun. (Ed.). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (pp. 3-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Aune, M. (1996) The Computer in Everyday Life: patterns of domestication of a new technology. In: Lie, M. & Sørensen, K.H. (eds.) Making technology our own? domesticating technology into everyday life. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont, Calif : Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Bakardjieva, Maria. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London: Sage. Bakardjieva, Maria. (2006). Domestication Running Wild. From the moral economy of the household to the mores of a culture. In: Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y. & Ward, K. (eds.) Domestication of media and technology. Berkshire: Open University Press. Baker, Paula. (1991). The moral frameworks of public life: Gender, politics, and the state in rural New York, 1870-1930. Oxford University Press. Bausinger, H. (1984). Media, technology and daily life. Media, Culture & Society, 6, 343-351. Bauman, Zygmunt (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, U.K. : Polity Press ; Malden, Mass. : Blackwell. Berlant, L. G. (2011). Cruel optimism (pp. viii+-342). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Bird, S. Elizabeth (2003). The audience in everyday life: Living in a media world. New York, NY : Routledge. Bradshaw, John (1996). Bradshaw On: The Family: A New Way of Creating Solid Self-Esteem. Health Communications, Inc. Bruner, Jerome (1987). Life as Narrative. Social Research 54(1):11-32. Carrier, James. (1990). Reconciling commodities and personal relations in industrial society. Theory and Society, 19(5), 579-598. Couldry, Nick. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115-132. De Certeau, M. (1998). The Practice of Everyday Life: Living and cooking. Volume 2 (Vol. 2). U of Minnesota Press. Danet, Brenda. (1998). Text as mask: Gender, play, and performance on the internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp129-158). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Daniels, A. K. (1987). Invisible work. Social Problems, 34, 403–415. Dietrich, D. (1998). (Re)-fashioning the techno-erotic woman: Gender and textuality in the cyberculture matrix. In S. Jonse (Ed.), Virtual culture, identity & communication in cybersociety (pp.168-184). London: Sage. Erickson, R. J. (1993). Reconceptualizing family work: The effect of emotion work on perceptions of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 888–900. Erickson, R. J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender, and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 337–351. Fisher, H.(1999). The first sex: The natural talents of women and how they are changing the world. New York: Random House. Fuller, J.A., & Warner, R.M. (2000). Family stressors as predictors of codependency. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 126(1), 5-22 . Giddens, Anthony. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. California: Stanford University Press. Giddens, Anthony. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. California: Stanford University Press. Giddens, Anthony. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press. Goldman, Robert. (1992). Reading ads socially. London: Routledge. Haaken, J. (1990). A critical analysis of the codependence construct. Psychiatry, 53, 396-406. Hall, Catherine. (2013). White, male and middle class: Explorations in feminism and history. John Wiley & Sons. Haddon, L. (2003). Domestication and mobile telephony. In Katz, J. E. (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology (pp. 43-55), New Brunswick, N.J. : Transaction Publishers. Haddon, L. (2004). Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction and Research Guide. Oxford: Berg. Haraway, D. (2000). A cyborg manifesto science, technology and socialist-feminism in the late twenty century. In D. Bell & B. M. Hardt, M. (1999). Affective Labor. Boundary 2, 26(2), 89–100. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of Empire. New York: The Penguin Press. Hobson, D. (1982). Crossroads: The drama of a soap opera. London, UK: Methuen. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press. Ho, D. Y. (1986). The Psychology of Chinese People. In M. H. Bond. (Ed.). Chinese patterns of socialization: A critical review(pp. 1-37). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. Kopytoff, Igor (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as Process. In Appadurai, Arjun. (Ed.). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (pp. 64-91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ladner, S. (2009). ‘Agency time’A case study of the postindustrial timescape and its impact on the domestic sphere. Time & Society, 18(2-3), 284-305. Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of everyday life, Vol. 1, (J. Moore, Trans.) London: Verso. Levenger, G. (1964). Task and social behavior in marriage. Sociometry, 27, 433–448. Livingstone, S. (1992). The meaning of domestic technologies. In Consuming Technologies Media and Information in Domestic Spaces (pp. 113-130). London ; New York, NY : Routledge. Livingstone, S., & Bovill, M. (2013). Bedroom culture and the privatization of media use. In Livingstone, S., & Bovill, M. (Eds.). Children and Their Changing Media Environment: A European Comparative Study (pp. 179-200). New York, NY : Routledge. McDowell, Linda (1999). Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press. Moores, S. (2000). Media and everyday life in modern society. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. Morley, David. (1986). Family television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure. London: Comedia Pub. Group. Morley, David. (2006). Media, modernity and technology: The geography of the new. London ; New York : Routledge. Newman, D. M. (2013). Sociology: Exploring the architecture of everyday life. Sage Publications. Oakley, A. (1974). Housewife. London: A. Lane. Pasquier, D., Buzzi, C., d'Haenens, L., & Sjöberg, U. (1998). Family Lifestyles and Media Use Patterns An Analysis of Domestic Media among Flemish, French, Italian and Swedish Children and Teenagers. European Journal of Communication, 13(4), 503-519. Pierson, J. (2005). Domestication at work in small businesses. In Domestication of media and technology (pp. 205-226), Maidenhead, Berkshire, English ; New York : Open University Press. Radway, J. A. (1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. The Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Satir, Virginia (1988). The new peoplemaking. Mountain View, CA: Science and Behavior Books. Scott, A., Semmens, L., & Willoughby, L. (1999). Women and the internet: The natural history of a research project. Information, Communication & Society, 2(4): 541-565. Singh, Supriya (2001). Gender and the use of the Internet at home. New Media & Society 3.4: 395-415. Silverstone, Roger. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge. Silverstone, Roger. (1999). Why study the media? London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE. Silverstone, Roger, Eric Hirsch, & David Morley (1994). Information and Communication Technologies and the Moral Economy of the household. In Consuming Technologies Media and Information in Domestic Spaces (pp. 9-18). London ; New York, NY : Routledge. Snow, R. P. (1987). Interaction with mass media: The importance of rhythm and tempo. Communication Quarterly, 35, 225-237. Sørensen, K.H., Aune, M. & Hatling, M. (2000) Against linearity - on the cultural appropriation of science and technology. In: Dierkes, M. & Von Grote, C. (eds.) Between Understanding and Trust: The public, science and technology. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. Spigel, Lynn. (1988). Installing the television set: popular discourses on television and domestic space, 1948–1955. Camera Obscura, 6(1 16), 9-46. Spigel, Lynn. (1992a). Private Screening: Television and the Female Consumer. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Spigel, Lynn. (1992b). Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. Spigel, Lynn. (2005). Designing the Smart House: Posthuman Domesticity and Conspicuous Production. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 8(4):403-426. Star, Susan Leigh. (1996). From Hestia to Home Page: Feminism and the Concept of Home in Cyberspace. In: Lykke, Nina & Braidotti, Rosi. (eds.) Between Monsters, Goddesses and Cyborgs. Feminist Confrontations with Science, Medicine and Cyberspace. London, New Jersey : Zed Books. Turkle, Sherry. (1988). Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women's voices (pp. 41-61). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Turkle, Sherry. (1997). Life on the screen : identity in the age of the Internet. New York :Simon & Schuster. Von-Broembsen, S. A. F. J. (1996). The Happy Home Myth: The Female Experience. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56, 289-318. Wakeford, N. (2000). ‘Networking Women and Girls With Information/Communication Technology: Surfing Tales of the World Wide Web. In D. Bell & B. M. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp.350-359). London: Routledge. Ward, K (2006) The Bald Guy Just Ate on Orange: domestication, work and home. In: Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y. & Ward, K. (eds.) Domestication of media and technology (pp. 143-164). Berkshire:Open University Press. Woolf, Virginia. (2000). A room of one's own / Three guineas. London, UK: Penguin. Yoshimi, Shunya. (1999). ‘Made in Japan’:the cultural politics of ‘home electrification’ in postwar Japan. Media Culture & Society. Vol. 21:149-171. Yoshimi, Shunya. (2003). Television and Nationalism: Historical Change in Domestic TV formation of Postwar Japan. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 6(4): 459-487. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
廣播電視學系
101453002資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101453002 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 王淑美 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Su-Mei en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 徐璿琇 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsu, Hsuan-Hsiu en_US dc.creator (作者) 徐璿琇 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Hsuan-Hsiu en_US dc.date (日期) 2015 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-Jun-2024 11:47:19 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-Jun-2024 11:47:19 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Jun-2024 11:47:19 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0101453002 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151516 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 廣播電視學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 101453002 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究欲探究未離家的年輕單身女性日常生活，並聚焦於她們日常生活中的媒體實踐，了解她們如何藉由使用傳播科技，克服身處於家庭結構中的弱勢地位，並跨越地理疆域、建構私人空間、隔絕家人窺視，再進一步地動搖家庭科層制度，尋找使家庭權力再重新分配的機會。 本研究以「使用者日記」和「深度訪談」，試圖分析這群未離家的單身女性如何運行她們的日常生活，並分別以四個層面進行分析：家庭勞務與資源分配的不均、家庭結構之下強化且綁定的情感勞動、傳播科技帶來的逃逸或制約，以及華人家庭共同想像的轉變所帶來的影響。 這四個部分，將分別對應這些女兒們的日常生活：探索物質基礎與身體勞動的關係、家庭結構下女兒是如何承擔了大量的情感勞動、傳播科技在其中所扮演的角色以及其所帶來的效果，最後是華人家庭想像逐漸崩解的焦慮。 本研究將從這四個角度出發，進一步拆解家庭的權力關係是如何作用於女兒們身上，使她們展現出如今的日常生活型態；並進一步揭示這些來自家庭的影響，遠不止存在於她們現在的居住空間、或與他人實體會面的關係中，更會隨著傳播科技延伸至外部，也會隨著情感勞動的內化，每時每刻動搖著她們；而她們身處這樣複雜的權力結構之中，又是如何應對。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study aims to explore the daily lives of young single women who have not left their families, and focuses on their everyday media practices to understand how they use communication technologies to overcome their disadvantageous position in the family structure, cross geographical boundaries, construct private spaces, isolate themselves from family members' peeping eyes, and challenge the hierarchical system by searching of opportunities to redistribute power in the family. Through 'media practice diaries' and 'in-depth interviews', this study attempts to analyze how these daughters run their daily lives at four levels: the unequal distribution of domestic labor and resources, the emotional labor that is reinforced and bonded under the family structure, the escape or constraints created by communication technologies, and the impact of the changing imagination of the Chinese family. Each of the four sections will address the daily lives of the daughters: exploring the relationship between material bases and physical labor, how the daughters have taken on a great deal of emotional labor under the family structure, the role of communication technology and its effects, and lastly, the anxiety of the disintegration of the Chinese family imagination. From these four perspectives, this study will further dismantle how the domestic authority acts on the daughters to cause their daily life patterns, revealing that these influences are not only reflected in their current living spaces or physical relationships with others, but also extended through communication technologies. Moreover, with internalized emotional labor, these influences also affect them in a near-pervasive way. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 壹、緒論 01 一、問題意識 01 二、研究背景 05 三、研究問題 15 四、小結 16 貳、文獻探討 18 一、傳播科技於家庭空間的特殊性 19 二、傳播科技與女性使用者 43 三、身為女兒，在華人家庭 64 四、女兒的重擔：家務、經濟支援，還有情感勞動 78 小結：離家，不只在居所上，也在心靈上 93 叁、研究方法 95 一、研究對象的選擇 96 二、研究設計 97 三、受訪者簡介 104 肆、研究資料分析：逃不走的女兒 106 一、重男輕女的資源不均：女兒們資源匱乏卻需承擔更多家庭責任 109 二、透過傳播科技強化的情感勞動：不能長大的女兒，不想獨立的父母 129 三、傳播科技的使用：女兒們逃逸的機會，也是既有權力結構的強化與延伸 159 四、「家」幻滅的憂慮：維繫「家」的要角，卻沒有任何主導權 189 伍、結論：離家的艱難 202 一、研究發現摘要 203 二、研究貢獻 213 三、研究限制 214 四、未來研究建議 217 陸、結語：在所有事物之上，我寫下妳的名字，自由 218 柒、參考資料 223 附錄 233 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101453002 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 日常生活 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 媒體實踐 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情感勞動 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 性別 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 婚姻 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) everyday life en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) media practices en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) emotional labor en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) gender en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) marriage en_US dc.title (題名) 待嫁／不嫁的女兒： 未離家單身女性的日常媒體實踐 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Unmarried Daughters: Everyday Media Practice of Single Females Who Live with Parents en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王君琦（2012）。〈現代戀愛與傳統家庭的倫理衝突：從臺語電影家庭倫理文藝愛情類型看 1950-1960 年代愛情、婚姻、家庭的道德想像〉，《應用倫理評論》，53：57-81。 王淑美（2014）。〈傳播科技與生活韻律──關於研究方法的探討〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，4(1)：23-43。 方念萱（2005）。《性別與傳播科技研究再探：以女性退用／續用網際網路個案為起點的研究》。（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC92-2412-H-004-011）。臺北：政治大學新聞系。 朱瑞玲、章英華（2001年7月）。〈華人社會的家庭倫理與家人互動：文化及社會的變遷效果〉，「華人家庭動態資料庫學術研討會」，台北市南港區。 吳筱玫（2003）。《網路傳播概論》。台北：智勝文化。 李美枝、鍾秋玉（1996）。〈性別與性別角色分析論〉，《本土心理學研究》，6: 260-299。 呂美頤（2000）。《中國社會史論》，周積明、宋德金（編），武漢：湖北教育出版社。 利翠珊、陳富美（2004）。〈配偶親職角色的支持與分工對夫妻恩情的影響〉，《本土心理學研究》，21: 49-83。 林德明、劉兆明（1997）。〈新傳統女性：由個案資料探討女主管的面貌與調適歷程 〉，《中華心理衛生學刊》，10(4): 53-79。 林萬億（2002）。〈台灣的家庭變遷與家庭政策〉，《臺大社會工作學刊》，6: 35-88。 柯裕棻（2008）。《電視國家：一九六０年代日本與美國對台灣的影響 研究成果報告(精簡版)》。（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC 96-2412-H-004-019）。臺北：政治大學新聞系。 施慧玲（2007）。〈民法親屬編之理想家庭圖像--從建構制度保障到寬容多元價值？〉，《月旦民商法雜誌》，17: 19-38。 張玉佩、呂育瑋（2006）。〈網路促進女性解放的可能？從線上遊戲談起〉，《中華傳播學刊》，9: 113-150。 黃光玉（2002年6月）。〈再探「主動的閱聽人」之核心意涵：質化與量化的異同〉，「2002中華傳播學會研討會」，台北縣深坑。 黃光國（1993）。〈人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲〉，楊國樞主編，《中國人的心理》，台北：桂冠：289-318。 黃厚銘（2001）。《虛擬社區中的身分認同》。台灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。 喻維欣（2009）。〈家庭〉，王振寰，瞿海源（編），《社會學與台灣社會（第三版）》，頁 185-209。台北：巨流。 陳玉華、陳信木（2012）。〈初婚年齡的變動趨勢：出生世代、教育程度與省籍背景之間的差異〉，伊慶春、章英華（編），《台灣的社會變遷1985-2005：家庭與婚姻》，頁229-275。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。 陳春富（2011）。〈「家」的夢想：解析房仲電視廣告中的家庭圖像與性別關係〉，《廣告學研究》，35，75-112。 葉光輝(2009)，「台灣民眾的代間交換行為：孝道觀點的探討」，本土心理學研究，第三十一卷，頁97-141。 楊靜利、陳寬政、李大正（2012）。〈近二十年來的家庭結構變遷〉，伊慶春、章英華（編），《台灣的社會變遷1985-2005：家庭與婚姻》，頁2-28。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。 楊國樞、葉光輝、黃曬莉（1989）。〈孝道的社會態度與行為：理論與測量〉，《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》，65: 171-227。 鄭美里（1997）。《女兒圈：台灣女同志的性別、家庭與圈内生活》。台北：女書文化事業有限公司。 孫迺翊（2006）。〈民法親屬編與社會法的交錯領域：一個教學構想的嘗試〉，《台灣本土法學雜誌》，89，87-104。 孫瑞穗（2005）。〈女性主義的空間再思：從女性主義理論化中的性別／空間政治談起〉，《婦研縱橫》，74: 56-63。 趙淑珠（2003）。〈未婚單身女性生活經驗之研究：婚姻意義的反思〉，《教育心理學報》，34(2): 221-246。 畢恆達（2003）。〈家的想像與性別差異〉，龔卓軍，王靜慧譯，《空間詩學》，頁12-19。台北：張老師文化。（原書Bachelard, G. [1994]. The poetics of space (Vol. 330). Boston: Beacon Press.） 盧嵐蘭（2007）。《閱聽人與日常生活》。台北：五南圖書。 Abercrombie, Nicholas & Longhurst, Brian. (1998). Audiences. London: Sage Appadurai, Arjun (1986) Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value. . In Appadurai, Arjun. (Ed.). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (pp. 3-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Aune, M. (1996) The Computer in Everyday Life: patterns of domestication of a new technology. In: Lie, M. & Sørensen, K.H. (eds.) Making technology our own? domesticating technology into everyday life. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont, Calif : Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Bakardjieva, Maria. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London: Sage. Bakardjieva, Maria. (2006). Domestication Running Wild. From the moral economy of the household to the mores of a culture. In: Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y. & Ward, K. (eds.) Domestication of media and technology. Berkshire: Open University Press. Baker, Paula. (1991). The moral frameworks of public life: Gender, politics, and the state in rural New York, 1870-1930. Oxford University Press. Bausinger, H. (1984). Media, technology and daily life. Media, Culture & Society, 6, 343-351. Bauman, Zygmunt (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, U.K. : Polity Press ; Malden, Mass. : Blackwell. Berlant, L. G. (2011). Cruel optimism (pp. viii+-342). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Bird, S. Elizabeth (2003). The audience in everyday life: Living in a media world. New York, NY : Routledge. Bradshaw, John (1996). Bradshaw On: The Family: A New Way of Creating Solid Self-Esteem. Health Communications, Inc. Bruner, Jerome (1987). Life as Narrative. Social Research 54(1):11-32. Carrier, James. (1990). Reconciling commodities and personal relations in industrial society. Theory and Society, 19(5), 579-598. Couldry, Nick. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115-132. De Certeau, M. (1998). The Practice of Everyday Life: Living and cooking. Volume 2 (Vol. 2). U of Minnesota Press. Danet, Brenda. (1998). Text as mask: Gender, play, and performance on the internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp129-158). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Daniels, A. K. (1987). Invisible work. Social Problems, 34, 403–415. Dietrich, D. (1998). (Re)-fashioning the techno-erotic woman: Gender and textuality in the cyberculture matrix. In S. Jonse (Ed.), Virtual culture, identity & communication in cybersociety (pp.168-184). London: Sage. Erickson, R. J. (1993). Reconceptualizing family work: The effect of emotion work on perceptions of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 888–900. Erickson, R. J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender, and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 337–351. Fisher, H.(1999). The first sex: The natural talents of women and how they are changing the world. New York: Random House. Fuller, J.A., & Warner, R.M. (2000). Family stressors as predictors of codependency. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 126(1), 5-22 . Giddens, Anthony. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. California: Stanford University Press. Giddens, Anthony. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. California: Stanford University Press. Giddens, Anthony. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press. Goldman, Robert. (1992). Reading ads socially. London: Routledge. Haaken, J. (1990). A critical analysis of the codependence construct. Psychiatry, 53, 396-406. Hall, Catherine. (2013). White, male and middle class: Explorations in feminism and history. John Wiley & Sons. Haddon, L. (2003). Domestication and mobile telephony. In Katz, J. E. (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology (pp. 43-55), New Brunswick, N.J. : Transaction Publishers. Haddon, L. (2004). Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction and Research Guide. Oxford: Berg. Haraway, D. (2000). A cyborg manifesto science, technology and socialist-feminism in the late twenty century. In D. Bell & B. M. Hardt, M. (1999). Affective Labor. Boundary 2, 26(2), 89–100. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of Empire. New York: The Penguin Press. Hobson, D. (1982). Crossroads: The drama of a soap opera. London, UK: Methuen. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press. Ho, D. Y. (1986). The Psychology of Chinese People. In M. H. Bond. (Ed.). Chinese patterns of socialization: A critical review(pp. 1-37). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. Kopytoff, Igor (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as Process. In Appadurai, Arjun. (Ed.). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (pp. 64-91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ladner, S. (2009). ‘Agency time’A case study of the postindustrial timescape and its impact on the domestic sphere. Time & Society, 18(2-3), 284-305. Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of everyday life, Vol. 1, (J. Moore, Trans.) London: Verso. Levenger, G. (1964). Task and social behavior in marriage. Sociometry, 27, 433–448. Livingstone, S. (1992). The meaning of domestic technologies. In Consuming Technologies Media and Information in Domestic Spaces (pp. 113-130). London ; New York, NY : Routledge. Livingstone, S., & Bovill, M. (2013). Bedroom culture and the privatization of media use. In Livingstone, S., & Bovill, M. (Eds.). Children and Their Changing Media Environment: A European Comparative Study (pp. 179-200). New York, NY : Routledge. McDowell, Linda (1999). Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press. Moores, S. (2000). Media and everyday life in modern society. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. Morley, David. (1986). Family television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure. London: Comedia Pub. Group. Morley, David. (2006). Media, modernity and technology: The geography of the new. London ; New York : Routledge. Newman, D. M. (2013). Sociology: Exploring the architecture of everyday life. Sage Publications. Oakley, A. (1974). Housewife. London: A. Lane. Pasquier, D., Buzzi, C., d'Haenens, L., & Sjöberg, U. (1998). Family Lifestyles and Media Use Patterns An Analysis of Domestic Media among Flemish, French, Italian and Swedish Children and Teenagers. European Journal of Communication, 13(4), 503-519. Pierson, J. (2005). Domestication at work in small businesses. In Domestication of media and technology (pp. 205-226), Maidenhead, Berkshire, English ; New York : Open University Press. Radway, J. A. (1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. The Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Satir, Virginia (1988). The new peoplemaking. Mountain View, CA: Science and Behavior Books. Scott, A., Semmens, L., & Willoughby, L. (1999). Women and the internet: The natural history of a research project. Information, Communication & Society, 2(4): 541-565. Singh, Supriya (2001). Gender and the use of the Internet at home. New Media & Society 3.4: 395-415. Silverstone, Roger. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge. Silverstone, Roger. (1999). Why study the media? London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE. Silverstone, Roger, Eric Hirsch, & David Morley (1994). Information and Communication Technologies and the Moral Economy of the household. In Consuming Technologies Media and Information in Domestic Spaces (pp. 9-18). London ; New York, NY : Routledge. Snow, R. P. (1987). Interaction with mass media: The importance of rhythm and tempo. Communication Quarterly, 35, 225-237. Sørensen, K.H., Aune, M. & Hatling, M. (2000) Against linearity - on the cultural appropriation of science and technology. In: Dierkes, M. & Von Grote, C. (eds.) Between Understanding and Trust: The public, science and technology. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. Spigel, Lynn. (1988). Installing the television set: popular discourses on television and domestic space, 1948–1955. Camera Obscura, 6(1 16), 9-46. Spigel, Lynn. (1992a). Private Screening: Television and the Female Consumer. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Spigel, Lynn. (1992b). Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. Spigel, Lynn. (2005). Designing the Smart House: Posthuman Domesticity and Conspicuous Production. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 8(4):403-426. Star, Susan Leigh. (1996). From Hestia to Home Page: Feminism and the Concept of Home in Cyberspace. In: Lykke, Nina & Braidotti, Rosi. (eds.) Between Monsters, Goddesses and Cyborgs. Feminist Confrontations with Science, Medicine and Cyberspace. London, New Jersey : Zed Books. Turkle, Sherry. (1988). Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women's voices (pp. 41-61). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Turkle, Sherry. (1997). Life on the screen : identity in the age of the Internet. New York :Simon & Schuster. Von-Broembsen, S. A. F. J. (1996). The Happy Home Myth: The Female Experience. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56, 289-318. Wakeford, N. (2000). ‘Networking Women and Girls With Information/Communication Technology: Surfing Tales of the World Wide Web. In D. Bell & B. M. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp.350-359). London: Routledge. Ward, K (2006) The Bald Guy Just Ate on Orange: domestication, work and home. In: Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y. & Ward, K. (eds.) Domestication of media and technology (pp. 143-164). Berkshire:Open University Press. Woolf, Virginia. (2000). A room of one's own / Three guineas. London, UK: Penguin. Yoshimi, Shunya. (1999). ‘Made in Japan’:the cultural politics of ‘home electrification’ in postwar Japan. Media Culture & Society. Vol. 21:149-171. Yoshimi, Shunya. (2003). Television and Nationalism: Historical Change in Domestic TV formation of Postwar Japan. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 6(4): 459-487. zh_TW
