學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Which is more influential on teaching practice, classroom management efficacy or instruction efficacy? Evidence from TALIS 2018
作者 陳榮政
Chen, Robin Jung-Cheng;Lin, Hsin-Chih;Hsueh, Yi-Lung;Hsieh, Chuan-Chung
貢獻者 教育系
關鍵詞 Teacher self-efficacy; Teaching practice; TALIS 2018
日期 2020-11
上傳時間 12-Jun-2024 12:00:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 This study aims to explore relationship between teacher self-efficacy and teacher teaching practice in junior high schools at Taiwan. TALIS (2018) survey database is adopted, and 3106 teachers were analyzed in this research. Through literature review and exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the research model is assumed to include two constructs (classroom management efficacy and instruction efficacy) in teacher self-efficacy, and three constructs (clarity of instruction practice, cognitive activation practice, and classroom management practice) in teacher teaching practice. Through the analysis of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the main findings are as follows. (1) For clarity of instruction practice, instruction efficacy has more positive influences than classroom management efficacy. (2) For classroom management practice, classroom management efficacy as more positive influences than instruction efficacy. (3) For cognitive activation practice, instruction efficacy has positive influences but classroom management efficacy has negative influences.
關聯 Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol.21, pp.589-599
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09656-8
dc.contributor 教育系
dc.creator (作者) 陳榮政
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Robin Jung-Cheng;Lin, Hsin-Chih;Hsueh, Yi-Lung;Hsieh, Chuan-Chung
dc.date (日期) 2020-11
dc.date.accessioned 12-Jun-2024 12:00:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-Jun-2024 12:00:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-Jun-2024 12:00:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151634-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study aims to explore relationship between teacher self-efficacy and teacher teaching practice in junior high schools at Taiwan. TALIS (2018) survey database is adopted, and 3106 teachers were analyzed in this research. Through literature review and exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the research model is assumed to include two constructs (classroom management efficacy and instruction efficacy) in teacher self-efficacy, and three constructs (clarity of instruction practice, cognitive activation practice, and classroom management practice) in teacher teaching practice. Through the analysis of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the main findings are as follows. (1) For clarity of instruction practice, instruction efficacy has more positive influences than classroom management efficacy. (2) For classroom management practice, classroom management efficacy as more positive influences than instruction efficacy. (3) For cognitive activation practice, instruction efficacy has positive influences but classroom management efficacy has negative influences.
dc.format.extent 106 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol.21, pp.589-599
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Teacher self-efficacy; Teaching practice; TALIS 2018
dc.title (題名) Which is more influential on teaching practice, classroom management efficacy or instruction efficacy? Evidence from TALIS 2018
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1007/s12564-020-09656-8
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09656-8