dc.contributor.advisor | 巫立宇<br>林智偉 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Wu, Lei-Yu<br>Lin, Chih-Wei | en_US |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 彭琦雁 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Peng, Chi-Yen | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 彭琦雁 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Peng, Chi-Yen | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2024 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 1-Jul-2024 12:24:18 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 1-Jul-2024 12:24:18 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 1-Jul-2024 12:24:18 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0111363017 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152012 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 111363017 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 臺灣的外送平台市場在2020年COVID-19疫情爆發後經歷了快速成長,且疫情期間也徹底改變了人們的消費習慣,使得外送服務變得更加普遍,此一需求隨著疫情趨緩後不減反增,而市場上不只是知名的外送平台如U外送平台和F外送平台,其他本土或國外的新競爭者也在看準商機後紛紛進入市場,使得競爭變得更加激烈。因此,外送平台需要不斷創新,提供更好的服務品質和滿足消費者需求,以在角逐過程中脫穎而出。
本研究探討的個案U外送平台,利用集團優勢提供創新的服務,並善用其全球品牌影響力,為商家及消費者創造出許多價值。本研究首先利用PEST分析架構探討U外送平台所處的產業環境,並以策略行銷 4C 架構分析U外送平台在面對與商家以及與消費者之交易過程可能產生阻礙之四類成本時,所做出之應對之道與策略。最後透過分析台灣外送平台的市場環境及U外送平台的經營策略,探討外送平台如何強化其商業模式,以提高市場佔有率,增強競爭優勢。
透過研究發現,U外送平台利用其品牌資源,整合叫車與外送業務推出了「Uber One」會員制度,不僅成為市場上唯一的跨平台會員制度,更創造了其他外送平台難以複製的商業模式。在其擁有此核心優勢與良好策略的基礎上,U外送平台對於四項成本間的連續關係也掌控得十分良好,透過有效地行銷策略、清楚地價值傳遞,不僅能直接提升商家與消費者的整體效益,也讓使用者更容易使用其產品與服務。而善用平台社群與關鍵影響力客戶,讓U外送平台有效地建立了與商家及消費者間的信任關係,再搭配商家端的數據支援與消費者端的會員的經營,提升使用者對U外送平台的專屬陷入資產,為用戶創造出永續的價值。經由前後連貫的行銷策略,以及在現有服務與產品上持續發展,U外送平台為使用者創造出有別於其他外送平台的高附加價值,也在過程中不斷提升其不可取代性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The delivery platform market in Taiwan experienced rapid growth after the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020, and the pandemic thoroughly altered consumer habits, making delivery services more prevalent. This demand continued to increase even as the pandemic subsided, intensifying market competition. Not only are well-known delivery platforms like U Food Delivery Platform (U Platform) and F Food Delivery Platform present, but other local or foreign competitors have also entered the market, exacerbating the level of competition. Therefore, delivery platforms need to innovate continuously, providing better service quality and meeting consumer needs to stand out in the competition.
The case study examined in this research, U Platform, leverages its group advantage to offer innovative services and effectively utilizes its global brand influence to create value for both businesses and consumers. The study first employs a PEST analysis framework to explore the industry environment in which U Platform operates. Then, using the 4C framework of strategic marketing, it analyzes the strategies adopted by U Platform in addressing the four types of costs that may hinder transactions with businesses and consumers. Finally, through an analysis of the market environment of delivery platforms in Taiwan and the operational strategies of U Platform, the study investigates how delivery platforms can strengthen their business models to increase market share and enhance competitiveness.
The research findings reveal that U Platform, leveraging its brand resources, introduced the "Uber One" membership system, integrating mobility and delivery services. This not only became the only cross-platform membership system in the market but also created a business model that other delivery platforms find challenging to replicate. With this core advantage and sound strategy, U Platform effectively manages the continuous relationship among the four costs by employing effective marketing strategies and delivering clear value propositions. By utilizing platform communities and key influential customers, U Platform has effectively built trust relationships with businesses and consumers. Coupled with data support for businesses and membership management for consumers, U Platform enhances users' exclusive assets, creating sustainable value for users. Through consistent marketing strategies and continuous development of existing services and products, U Platform creates higher added value than other delivery platforms and continually improves its irreplaceability. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 II
摘要 III
ABSTRACT IV
目次 V
圖次 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究方法及目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 PEST分析架構 4
第二節 策略行銷 4C 分析架構 5
第三章 產業概況介紹 11
第一節 外送平台產業環境 11
第二節 外送平台產業鏈 17
第三節 外送平台商業經營模式 20
第四章 個案分析 24
第一節 U外送平台簡介 24
第二節 U外送平台之經營策略分析 30
第五章 總結 46
第一節 結論與建議 46
第二節 研究限制與後續研究建議 52
參考文獻 54 | zh_TW |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111363017 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 臺灣外送平台 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | PEST分析架構 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 策略行銷4C分析架構 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Taiwan food delivery platform industry | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | PEST analysis | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 4C framework of strategic marketing | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 以4C架構探討外送平台公司經營策略 ——以U外送平台為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | Food Delivery Platform Business Strategy Analysis based on 4C Framework: A Case Study of U Food Delivery Platform | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文文獻
巫立宇、邱志聖(2015)。銷售與顧客關係修訂版。新陸出版社。
邱志聖(2014)。策略行銷分析:架構與實務應用第四版。智勝出版社。
侯英泠(2020)。論美食外送服務網路平台之法律性質探討-以 Uber Eats 為例。月旦民商法雜誌,第68期,頁85-106。
徐婉寧(2021)。論平台經濟美食外送員之勞動權益保障。臺灣海洋法學報,第30期,頁1-24。
湯芷晴(2022)。消費者使用外送平台行為之研究-以Foodpanda與Uber Eats為例。國立宜蘭大學應用經濟與管理學系經營管理碩士班碩士論文。
劉家棋(2022)。台灣餐飲外送平台產業分析。國立中央大學高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文。
蘇俊吉(2015)。行動通信的演進歷程。科學發展,第513期,頁58-63。
外文文獻
Aguilar, F. J. (1967). Scanning the Business Environment. Macmillan, New York.
Austin, J. E. (1990). Managing In Developing Countries. Simon and Schuster, New York.
Collison, J. (2020). The Impact of Online Food Delivery Services on Restaurant Sales. Stanford Digital Repository.
Hirschberger, C., Rajko, A., Schumacher, T., and Wrulich, M. (2016). “The changing market for food delivery,” McKinsey, Research.
Morell, L. (2022). “The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Online Food Delivery Apps.” UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 4549.
Thompson, D. (2019). “The Booming, Ethically Dubious Business of Food Delivery,” The Atlantic, August 2.
Yeo, V., Goh, S., and Rezaei, S. (2017). “Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 35, pp. 150-162.
電子資料
公平交易委員會(2021年9月23日)。公平交易委員會處分書 公處字第110066號。取自:https://www.ftc.gov.tw/uploadDecision/46df5ed0-3189-4d47-a90f-bcb941fb1d9a.pdf
王一芝(2020年6月11日)。拒絕Uber Eats 50次、砸錢建串接系統,獨家直擊鼎泰豐5大外送心法。取自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5100666?template=transformers
行政院(2019年5月10日)。台灣5G行動計畫。取自:https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/087b4ed8-8c79-49f2-90c3-6fb22d740488
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2023 年 8 月29 日)。2023年台灣網路報告。取自:https://report.twnic.tw/2023/
勞動部(2023年10月11日)。勞動部持續推動勞資溝通平台,積極研議外送員勞動權益保障規範。取自:https://www.mol.gov.tw/1607/1632/1633/64709/
黃台中(2022年2月23日)。點點全球發表5G AIoT點餐系統 異業結盟助餐飲業數位升級。取自:https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20220223700633-431207
經濟部統計處(2023)。批發、零售及餐飲業動態調查。取自:https://dmz26.moea.gov.tw/GMWeb/investigate/InvestigateEA.aspx
經濟部統計處(2023)。批發、零售及餐飲業經營實況調查報告。取自:https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/content/ContentLink.aspx?menu_id=9431
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2021年9月30日)。修正發布。網路美食外送平台業者自主衛生管理指引。取自:https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteContent.aspx?sid=11010
Uber(2022)。平台經濟影響力報告。取自:https://uberapac.publicfirst.co.uk/taiwan/?lang=zh-hant
Uber(2024)。隨心暢行、隨點即送,一切盡在 Uber One會員方案。取自:https://www.uber.com/tw/zh-tw/u/uber-one/
Uber Eats for Merchants(2024)。資源庫。取自:https://merchants.ubereats.com/tw/zh-tw/resources/learning-center/
Uber Newsroom(2017年12月7日)。Uber Eats優食:擁抱食物無限的可能。取自:https://www.uber.com/zh-TW/newsroom/uber-eats優食:擁抱食物無限的可能
Statista(2024)。Online Food Delivery。取自:https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/online-food-delivery/taiwan | zh_TW |