| dc.contributor | 中文系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林宏明 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2016-10 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 3-Jul-2024 13:22:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 3-Jul-2024 13:22:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 3-Jul-2024 13:22:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152221 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 在「卜骨文例」的範疇內，弄清骨邊單刻干支的性質，對讀懂卜骨上卜辭間的關係及復 原甲骨很有幫助。骨邊單刻「干支／干支卜」的性質究竟為何？該如何理解？以往沒有專門 的研究。對於骨邊「簡略刻辭」，李學勤曾提過「胛骨邊上面積狹小，所以在武丁時常只刻幾個 字，而詳細的卜辭則抄在骨扇上，骨扇和骨邊互相對照」的「邊扇對應」解釋。卜骨確實有上述 的文例，但其涵蓋範圍究竟如何，實際並不清楚。 由於卜骨殘缺，尚未有全面考察。李先生是否將「骨邊單刻干支」的內容納入已不得而 知。不過，就完整卜骨而言，「邊扇對應」實仍無法解釋許多卜辭在卜骨上的分布。劉影提出 「首扇對貞」文例，同樣也有適用範圍的問題，否則結合二者的文例就容易得到「骨首－骨 邊－骨扇」內容對應或對貞的看法。但明顯的，卜骨的內容往往非三者對應（貞），否則骨首 只刻一至二條卜辭，而多數的單一卜骨，並不僅只卜問一至二種內容。可見這些文例，實有 適用的範圍與規則，只是目前尚未被學界釐清而已。 筆者以「干支／干支卜」為切入角度，全面整理這些卜辭，是因筆者體會到此切入點極 可能是打開「處理文例適用範圍」的鑰匙。原因是如果透過骨邊簡短的命辭加以研究，難免 受到內容解讀不同的干擾，而造成對於「邊扇對應」與否的歸類差異。歸類可以因人而異， 就無法降低主觀看法對結論的影響。而骨邊干支與骨扇、骨首完整卜辭的干支是否對應，則 是客觀的。因此筆者對於全面搜集這些材料而加以考察此問題，感到相當興奮而躍躍欲試。 卜骨上僅刻干支的材料過去因內容簡單，有不少未收在合集、合補之列，近年新出甲骨 著錄中往往有關此內容的新材料公布，因此本計畫針對「骨邊刻有干支／干支卜的內容」全 面搜羅而加以研究。 計畫完成，對學術研究的貢獻，可從幾個方面說：首先，對研究者而言，計畫成果將提 供全面且反映綴合、成套卜辭情況的骨邊「干支／干支卜」的所有甲骨片號，對繼續從事卜 骨文例研究的學者，可省去本計畫最困難的搜集材料的過程。其次，對於「卜骨文例」的進 一步掌握，可嘗試建構卜骨文例中與骨邊有關的「邊扇對應」「相間刻辭」等文例的適用範圍， 重新評估以往糢糊套用「邊扇對應」、「相關刻辭」的那些卜辭的理解。第三，確認骨邊「干 支／干支卜」的性質，回答是否全數可用李學勤「邊扇對應」來理解。第四，就筆者個人而 言，在執行計畫期間，對卜骨文例更能掌握，應可再新綴合一批甲骨。最後，本計畫的兼任 助理可以受到甲骨學相關知識的訓練，培養研究人材。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In the field of oracle inscriptions, it helps to rejoin oracle fragments if the one-sided oracle inscriptions of ganzhi(干支) are fully understood. However, it used to lack specialized research in the past. The illustration “邊扇對應” proposed by 李 學勤, are indeed included in the augury oracle inscriptions, but the coverage is still unknown. Thus, the illustration is not able to explain the distributions of the augury oracle inscriptions. As for another illustration 首扇對貞brought up by 劉影, there exists the same problem. The author rearrange these augury inscriptions thoroughly according to ganzhi/ ganzhipu, for this method might be referred to a key to the dispose of the illustration. There tends to be differences of subjective opinions regarding distribution; however, whether the oracle edge ganzhi matches with the ganzhi in complete augury inscriptions is objective. Therefore, the author is eager to comprehensively collect these materials and examine this problem. The material of the solely inscribed ganzhi on the oracles was not selected in the collections due to the easy content. With the new publications about the related materials, the author expects to collect and research on the interrelated materials. The contribution of this academic studies can be dealt with in several aspects. First, the result of this studies will provide researchers with the comprehensively related oracle rejoinings, which spares a lot of time collecting materials. Second, it is beneficial to the further understanding of illustrations of oracle inscription. Third, the project aims to make affirmation of the qualification of ganzhi/ganzhipu, hoping to examine 李學勤「邊扇 對應」. Last but not least, the assistant of this project can receive training concerning knowledge of oracle studies. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST104-2410-H004-166, 104.08-105.07 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 甲骨; 干支 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Oracle; Ganzhi | |
| dc.title (題名) | 卜骨文例研究─以骨邊單刻干支為範圍 | |
| dc.title (題名) | Studies on Oracle Inscriptions---Based on One-Sided Oracle Inscriptions of Gan-Zhi | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
