Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 人文創新H-EHA模式在策略形成之應用—以I研究中心為例
Application of the H-EHA Model for Humanity Innovation in Strategy Formulation—A Case Study of I Research Center
作者 李知鄅
Li, Chih-Yu
貢獻者 黃政仁
‪Huang, Cheng-Jen
李知鄅
Li, Chih-Yu
關鍵詞 人文創新
H-EHA模式
策略形成
Humanity Innovation
H-EHA Model
Strategy Formulation
日期 2024
上傳時間 5-Aug-2024 12:20:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 隨著永續社會觀念的興起,事業未來的創新策略取決於生態系中多方成員的協作和整個生態系統的共同主張,從而實現永續發展並創造價值。本研究以台灣某研究中心為研究對象,旨在從生態系架構重新檢視研究中心的運作模式,透過人文創新H-EHA模式,以人文(Humanity)、生態(Ecosystem)、樞紐(Hub)和星群(Asterism)四項主張作為論述基礎,研究中心作為軸心樞紐,從顧客的需求角度出發,建立生態系統促進合作共創,實現事業成長擴展目標。本研究使用H-EHA模式作為策略形成工具,將生態系的軸心主張作為基礎,結合訪談與資訊分析,形成研究中心的創新策略,期望研究中心在未來能與利益相關者達成互利共贏,促進學術界與實務界的進步,共同邁向國際化的目標。
With the rise of sustainable society concepts, the future innovation strategies of enterprises depend on the collaborative efforts of various stakeholders within the ecosystem and the shared claims of the entire system, thereby achieving sustainable development and creating value. This study focuses on a research center in Taiwan, aiming to re-examine its operational model from an ecosystem framework perspective. Utilizing the H-EHA model of humanity innovation, which is based on four claims—Humanity, Ecosystem, Hub, and Asterism—the research center acts as a central hub. From the perspective of customer needs, it establishes an ecosystem to promote collaborative co-creation, achieving business growth and expansion goals. The study employs the H-EHA model as a strategy formation tool. By leveraging the core claims of the ecosystem, and combining interviews and information analysis, an innovative strategy for the research center is formulated. It is hoped that in the future, mutual benefits with stakeholders can be achieved, promoting progress in both academia and practice, and jointly advancing towards internationalization.
參考文獻 司徒達賢,2005,策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法 = Strategic management : a new perspective for analysis,臺北:智勝文化事業有限公司。 吳安妮,2017,談以 SO 計分卡形成「創新策略」,哈佛商業評論數位版,https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/16960/use-scorecard-to-make-a-new-innovative-strategy,擷取日期:2024 年 3 月 27 日。 吳安妮,2018,策略形成及執行,臺北:臉譜出版社股份有限公司。 吳安妮,2019,企業策略的終極答案,臺北:臉譜出版社股份有限公司。 吳安妮,2023,用AVM做對管理,臺北:遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司。 吳思華,2000,策略九說:策略思考的本質 = The nature of the strategy,臺北:臉譜出版社股份有限公司。 吳思華,2022,尋找創新典範3.0 : 人文創新H-EHA模式,臺北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。 潘淑滿,2022,質性研究:理論與應用,新北:心理出版社股份有限公司。 Adner, R. 2012. The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation: Penguin Uk. Adner, R. 2017. Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management 43 (1):39-58. Autio, E., and L. D. Thomas. 2021. Researching ecosystems in innovation contexts. Innovation & Management Review 19 (1):12-25. Birkinshaw, J. 2019. Ecosystem businesses are changing the rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review 8:1-7. Fontana, A., and J. Frey. 1994. The art of science. The handbook of qualitative research 361376. Foster, W., & Bradach, J. 2005. Should nonprofits seek profits?. Harvard Business Review 83(2): 92-100. Iansiti, M., and R. Levien. 2004. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review 82 (3):68-78. Jacobides, M. G., C. Cennamo, and A. Gawer. 2018. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal 39 (8):2255-2276. Kaplan, R., and D. McMillan. 2021. Reimagining the balanced scorecard for the ESG era. Harvard Business. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2021/02/reimagining-the-balanced-scorecard-for-the-esg-era Moore, J. F. 1993. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review 71 (3):75-86. Pickton, D. W., and S. Wright. 1998. What's swot in strategic analysis? Strategic Change 7 (2):101-109. Pidun, U., M. Reeves, and M. Schüssler. 2020. How do you “design” a business ecosystem? Boston Consulting Group: BCG Henderson Institute. Porter, M. E., and C. Strategy. 1980. Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free. Porter, M. E. 1996. What Is Strategy?. Harvard Business Review 74 (6): 61–78. Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications. Vol. 6: Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計學系
111353003
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353003
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 黃政仁zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor ‪Huang, Cheng-Jenen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李知鄅zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Li, Chih-Yuen_US
dc.creator (作者) 李知鄅zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Li, Chih-Yuen_US
dc.date (日期) 2024en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-Aug-2024 12:20:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-Aug-2024 12:20:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Aug-2024 12:20:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0111353003en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152477-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 111353003zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著永續社會觀念的興起,事業未來的創新策略取決於生態系中多方成員的協作和整個生態系統的共同主張,從而實現永續發展並創造價值。本研究以台灣某研究中心為研究對象,旨在從生態系架構重新檢視研究中心的運作模式,透過人文創新H-EHA模式,以人文(Humanity)、生態(Ecosystem)、樞紐(Hub)和星群(Asterism)四項主張作為論述基礎,研究中心作為軸心樞紐,從顧客的需求角度出發,建立生態系統促進合作共創,實現事業成長擴展目標。本研究使用H-EHA模式作為策略形成工具,將生態系的軸心主張作為基礎,結合訪談與資訊分析,形成研究中心的創新策略,期望研究中心在未來能與利益相關者達成互利共贏,促進學術界與實務界的進步,共同邁向國際化的目標。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the rise of sustainable society concepts, the future innovation strategies of enterprises depend on the collaborative efforts of various stakeholders within the ecosystem and the shared claims of the entire system, thereby achieving sustainable development and creating value. This study focuses on a research center in Taiwan, aiming to re-examine its operational model from an ecosystem framework perspective. Utilizing the H-EHA model of humanity innovation, which is based on four claims—Humanity, Ecosystem, Hub, and Asterism—the research center acts as a central hub. From the perspective of customer needs, it establishes an ecosystem to promote collaborative co-creation, achieving business growth and expansion goals. The study employs the H-EHA model as a strategy formation tool. By leveraging the core claims of the ecosystem, and combining interviews and information analysis, an innovative strategy for the research center is formulated. It is hoped that in the future, mutual benefits with stakeholders can be achieved, promoting progress in both academia and practice, and jointly advancing towards internationalization.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 3 第三節 論文架構 4 第貳章 文獻探討 6 第一節 策略理論相關之文獻 6 第二節 策略形成相關文獻 13 第三節 生態系相關文獻 22 第四節 研究延伸 30 第參章 研究方法 31 第一節 個案研究法與深度訪談法 31 第二節 研究流程 32 第三節 資料蒐集與訪談實施 33 第四節 訪談問題大綱 36 第五節 個案研究中心介紹 41 第肆章 研究結果 43 第一節 人文 43 第二節 生態 62 第三節 樞紐 84 第四節 星群 99 第五節 創新策略 107 第伍章 研究結論與建議 109 第一節 研究結論 109 第二節 研究建議 111 第三節 研究限制 113 參考資料 114zh_TW
dc.format.extent 9805405 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353003en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人文創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) H-EHA模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 策略形成zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Humanity Innovationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) H-EHA Modelen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Strategy Formulationen_US
dc.title (題名) 人文創新H-EHA模式在策略形成之應用—以I研究中心為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Application of the H-EHA Model for Humanity Innovation in Strategy Formulation—A Case Study of I Research Centeren_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 司徒達賢,2005,策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法 = Strategic management : a new perspective for analysis,臺北:智勝文化事業有限公司。 吳安妮,2017,談以 SO 計分卡形成「創新策略」,哈佛商業評論數位版,https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/16960/use-scorecard-to-make-a-new-innovative-strategy,擷取日期:2024 年 3 月 27 日。 吳安妮,2018,策略形成及執行,臺北:臉譜出版社股份有限公司。 吳安妮,2019,企業策略的終極答案,臺北:臉譜出版社股份有限公司。 吳安妮,2023,用AVM做對管理,臺北:遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司。 吳思華,2000,策略九說:策略思考的本質 = The nature of the strategy,臺北:臉譜出版社股份有限公司。 吳思華,2022,尋找創新典範3.0 : 人文創新H-EHA模式,臺北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。 潘淑滿,2022,質性研究:理論與應用,新北:心理出版社股份有限公司。 Adner, R. 2012. The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation: Penguin Uk. Adner, R. 2017. Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management 43 (1):39-58. Autio, E., and L. D. Thomas. 2021. Researching ecosystems in innovation contexts. Innovation & Management Review 19 (1):12-25. Birkinshaw, J. 2019. Ecosystem businesses are changing the rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review 8:1-7. Fontana, A., and J. Frey. 1994. The art of science. The handbook of qualitative research 361376. Foster, W., & Bradach, J. 2005. Should nonprofits seek profits?. Harvard Business Review 83(2): 92-100. Iansiti, M., and R. Levien. 2004. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review 82 (3):68-78. Jacobides, M. G., C. Cennamo, and A. Gawer. 2018. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal 39 (8):2255-2276. Kaplan, R., and D. McMillan. 2021. Reimagining the balanced scorecard for the ESG era. Harvard Business. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2021/02/reimagining-the-balanced-scorecard-for-the-esg-era Moore, J. F. 1993. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review 71 (3):75-86. Pickton, D. W., and S. Wright. 1998. What's swot in strategic analysis? Strategic Change 7 (2):101-109. Pidun, U., M. Reeves, and M. Schüssler. 2020. How do you “design” a business ecosystem? Boston Consulting Group: BCG Henderson Institute. Porter, M. E., and C. Strategy. 1980. Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free. Porter, M. E. 1996. What Is Strategy?. Harvard Business Review 74 (6): 61–78. Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications. Vol. 6: Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.zh_TW