| dc.contributor.advisor | 王儷玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 闕暉恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Chueh, Hui-En | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 闕暉恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chueh, Hui-En | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2024 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 5-Aug-2024 14:02:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 5-Aug-2024 14:02:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-Aug-2024 14:02:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0111358011 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152785 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 風險管理與保險學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 111358011 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 隨著全球氣候變化問題的加劇，碳排放控制與碳市場已成為國際社會的重要
議題，本研究旨在分析國際碳市場的發展歷程及其對台灣碳市場政策的啟示。研
究首先回顧國際上主要的碳稅制和碳權交易市場的發展，特別是歐盟、韓國、中
國、日本和新加坡的案例，透過比較這些國家的政策框架和市場機制，探討台灣
在建立與國際接軌的碳市場體制時可以借鑒的成功經驗與面臨的挑戰。
研究發現，，台灣在動碳碳及及碳交易政策面面，然取得了一一進展展，與與
國際成熟市場相比，仍有諸多挑戰，例如法規不健全、市場規模有限、缺乏國際
合作等因素，均可能阻礙台灣碳市場的國際競爭力。因此，本研究提出一一系列
建議，旨在強化政策法規、擴大市場規模、提升市場透明度和信任度、鼓勵技術
創新與國際合作。
本研究建議台灣政府應加強與國際機構的合作，參與更多國際碳減排項目，
並透過法規改革，建立更加開放和透明的碳交易市場，同時，提升企業及公眾對
碳交易機制的認知與接受度也是提升台灣碳市場國際競爭力的關鍵，透過這些策
略的實施，台灣不僅能在國際上扮演更積極的角色，也能實現永續發展和經濟成
長的雙重目標。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | As global climate change intensifies, carbon emissions control has become a
pivotal issue for the international community. This research aims to analyze the
development trajectory of international carbon markets and their implications for
Taiwan's carbon market policies. Initially, the study reviews the evolution of major
carbon tax systems and carbon trading markets, specifically focusing on the cases of
the European Union, South Korea, China, Japan, and Singapore. By comparing these
nations' policy frameworks and market mechanisms, the thesis explores successful
experiences and challenges that Taiwan can learn from as it seeks to establish a carbon
market system integrated with international standards.
The research notes that although Taiwan has made some progress in promoting
carbon fees and trading policies, it faces numerous challenges compared to established
international markets. These challenges include incomplete regulatory frameworks,
limited market size, and a lack of international collaboration, which could hinder the
international competitiveness of Taiwan’s carbon market. Consequently, this study
proposes a series of recommendations aimed at strengthening policy and regulations,
expanding market size, enhancing market transparency and trust, and encouraging
technological innovation and international cooperation.
The paper suggests that the Taiwanese government should enhance cooperation
with international bodies and participate in more international carbon reduction projects.
Moreover, through regulatory reforms, Taiwan can establish a more open and
transparent carbon trading market. Additionally, increasing corporate and public
awareness and acceptance of carbon trading mechanisms is crucial for enhancing
Taiwan's competitiveness in the global carbon market. Implementing these strategies
not only positions Taiwan as a more proactive international player but also helps
achieve the dual goals of sustainable development and economic growth. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與碳機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究面法 3
第四節 研究架構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 國際碳進價機制分類與碳權進義 5
第二節 國際碳市場發展沿革 10
第三節 國際碳市場發展挑戰議題 24
第三章 國際碳排放市場發展狀況 27
第一節 國際碳稅市場 27
第二節 國際強制性碳權市場 30
第三節 國際自願性碳權市場 40
第四章 台灣碳排放市場發展狀況 47
第一節 台灣碳及、碳稅發展 47
第二節 台灣排放交易機制與碳信用抵換機制發展 57
第五章 碳市場策略分析 61
第一節 CBAM 與台灣碳市場 61
第二節 台灣與國際碳排放差異分析 67
第六章 結論與建議 74
參考文獻 77 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 2504782 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111358011 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 碳權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 碳費 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 碳市場 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 碳交易 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Carbon Credit | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Carbon Tax | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Carbon Market Mechanism | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Carbon Trading | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 台灣碳權交易市場如何與國際接軌 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | How does Taiwan’s carbon trading market integrate with international standards? | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文部分
吳珮瑛. (2023). 剖析課徵國家層級碳稅之稅收結構與碳稅收入的使用─ OECD,
EU 與 G20 主要國家碳訂價的檢視. 台灣國際研究季刊, 19(3), 1-126.
李堅明. (2019). 臺灣碳權交易與碳稅的未來. 會計研究月刊(408), 101-107.
李堅明. (2023). 臺灣淨零曙光-臺灣碳權交易所設立. 會計研究月刊(452), 64-75.
（宜賢. (2023). 歐盟碳邊境調整機制實施倒數 政府與企業如何因應? 會計研究
月刊(450), 72-81.
范建了、連振安. (2021). 《巴黎協進》第 6 條機制於國際發展合作計畫之意
義. 國際開發援助現場季刊(6), 23-30.
徐中芃；（俊成. (2016). 日本減量額度制度現況與森（碳匯運作. 台灣（業雙
月刊, 42：4(行政院農業委員會（務局), 38-42.
高晟晉. (2021). 國際碳權交易市場之發展與趨勢. 證券服務(683), 57-64.
高晟晉. (2023a). 國際碳權交易產業簡介. 證券服務(696), 65-79.
高晟晉. (2023b). 證券交易所如何協助碳市場發展. 證券服務(698), 31-46.
國家發展委員會. (2022). 2050 淨零排放路徑及策略總說明.
溫麗琪, & 周雨蓁. (2021). 淺談歐盟 [碳邊境調整機制] 對我國之可能影響及因
應建議. 經濟前瞻(198), 123-128.
環境部. (2024). 環境部預告「碳及收及辦法」、「自主減量計畫管理辦法」及
「碳及徵收對象溫室氣體減量指進目標」三項草案. Retrieved from
https://enews.moenv.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/81c06c43-fb95-49a8-
9cff-ef10a7bc92e9
謝德勇. (2013). 歐盟碳排放交易制度之缺陷分析.
羅時芳. (2009). 國際間排放交易制度發展現況與執行成效. 環境工程會刊, 3, 1-
11.
78
二、英文部分
Böhringer, C. (2003). The Kyoto protocol: a review and perspectives. Oxford Review
of Economic Policy, 19(3), 451-466.
Change, U. C. (2023). Unlocking Climate Ambition: the Significance of Article 6 at
COP28. https://unfccc.int/news/unlocking-climate-ambition-the-significance-
of-article-6-at-cop28
Commission, E. (2024). EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS).
https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets_en
Couckuyt, D., Arimura, T. H., Miyamoto, T., & Yajima, N. (2023). Green
Policymaking in Japanese Municipalities: An Empirical Study on External and
Internal Contextual Factors. Sustainability, 15(9), 7449.
Gauss, M. (2012). Foundation “Future of the Carbon Market”. https://www.carbon-
mechanisms.de/en/news-details/the-future-of-the-carbon-market-foundation
Greenfield, P. (2023). Revealed: more than 90% of rainforest carbon offsets by
biggest certifier are worthless, analysis shows. The Guardian Article.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/18/revealed-forest-
carbon-offsets-biggest-provider-worthless-verra-aoe
ICAP. (2024). Emissions Trading Worldwide: 2024 ICAP Status Report. ICAP
Kertscher, T. (2023). Red light on ‘greenwashing’? US regulatory agency takes fresh
look at deceptive climate claims.
https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/jul/17/red-light-on-greenwashing-us-
regulatory-agency-tak/
Nordhaus, W. (2013). The climate casino: Risk, uncertainty, and economics for a
warming world. Yale University Press.
Runyon, N. (2024). ESG disclosure mandates & standards likely to spur rise in
79
greenwashing claims in 2024 & beyond. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-
us/posts/esg/esg-disclosure-greenwashing-claims/
Schumer, S. B. a. C. (2023). 10 Big Findings from 10 Big Findings from the 2023
IPCC Report on Climate Change. https://www.wri.org/insights/2023-ipcc-ar6-
synthesis-report-climate-change-findings
Secretariat, U. (2024a). Parties & Observers. Retrieved from
https://unfccc.int/parties-observers
Secretariat, U. (2024b). Process and meetings. Retrieved from
https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/what-is-the-united-nations-
framework-convention-on-climate-change
Templearchive, J. (2023). The growing signs of trouble for global carbon markets.
MIT Technology Review.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/11/02/1082765/the-growing-signs-
of-trouble-for-global-carbon-markets/
Twidale, S. (2023). Carbon offset firm South Pole cuts ties with Zimbabwe forest
project. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/cop/carbon-offset-
firm-south-pole-cuts-ties-with-zimbabwe-forest-project-2023-10-27/
UNEP. (2023). Emissions Gap Report 2023: Broken Record. | zh_TW |
