1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Liberal Arts
  4. NSC Projects
  5. Item

Publications-NSC Projects

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 再探《荀子》中道德心理學與後設倫理學議題
Issues of Moral Psychology and Metaethics in the Xunzi: a Further Investigation
作者 王華
貢獻者 哲學系
關鍵詞 荀子; 情感; 道德判斷; 禮; 建構論; 規範性
Xunzi; emotion; moral judgment; li; constructivism; normativity
日期 2019-10
上傳時間 15-Aug-2024 09:04:05 (UTC+8)
摘要 本計畫承續申請者在目前執行計畫「荀子道德心理學初探」中「探究道德轉化的相關道德心理學議題」這份核心關懷以及執行成果，進一步發展對《荀子》的新詮釋：文化建構論。這個詮釋包含道德心理學與後設倫理學等面向，重心放在釐清人際互動、情感經驗、與禮的實踐在道德判斷、人性詮釋、道德生活、與道德規範性中扮演的角色，因此亦具規範倫理學意涵。本計畫分為四個階段，預計四年完成。第一階段發展此詮釋之道德心理學面向，探討情感在道德判斷中扮演的角色，具體來說進行兩方面工作：1. 藉由檢視其他兩個對《荀子》中道德判斷的重要詮釋並與之比較，強化在前一計畫研究下稍具雛形的「混合道德判斷模型」。2. 藉由檢視一個休姆式情感感知道德判斷模型並與之比較，與其他道德判斷模型進行對話並展示「混合道德判斷模型」的優點與重要性。第二階段進一部釐清《荀子》中對情感的理解，思考其在道德轉化中與禮的關係，並與當今重要情感研究對話。具體來說，這階段將「混合道德判斷模型」中對情感的理解與感知理論、判斷理論、與評價態度理論相比較，從情感研究取得資源探討禮的實踐對情感建構如何可能，並作實例分析。第三階段重心轉向此詮釋之後設倫理學面向，具體來說主要進行兩方面工作：1. 發展受《荀子》文本啟發的一個後設倫理學立場：文化建構論。2. 將此立場與另兩個非常相關的後設倫理學立場（道德實存論、休姆式建構論）相比較，藉此釐清其特色與優點。若能力可及也考慮將此立場與亞里斯多德式建構論相比較，預期會有重要的相似之處。第四階段檢視文化建構論作為《荀子》詮釋的特色與優勢，具體來說主要進行兩方面工作：1. 進行文本分析與釐清工作，並將文化建構論與其他《荀子》相關詮釋作比較，論證其特色與重要性。2. 整合道德心理學面向與後設倫理學兩個面向的成果，完整呈現文化建構論的內容與意涵。
This 4-year project is a natural development from the MOST project that I’m currently executing. It aims to explore issues of moral psychology and meta-ethics in the Xunzi, and its ultimate goal is to develop and defend a position, cultural constructivism, that is inspired by, and a plausible interpretation of, the Xunzi. This position will have its substantive- and meta-ethical implications, as well as a special focus on the nature and the importance of emotions and ritual practices. This project is divided into four stages:1.The Role of Emotions in Moral judgments: A Comparative StudyI build on the “hybrid model” proposed in my previous work on the role emotions play in moral judgment in the Xunzi by (1) further exploring the nature and the function of emotions in the Xunzian model of moral judgment by examining two other contemporary interpretations, one by Van Norden/Hutton, and one by Sung; and (2) compare my Xunzian hybrid model with a contemporary Humean, emotion-based model: Sinhababu’s emotional perception model.2.The Nature of Emotions, Construction, and Ritual Practices: A Comparative StudyI delve deeper into the research of emotions. I aim to answer two questions: the nature of emotions, and the extent to which emotions can be acquired through and constructed by ritual practices. I first examine important contemporary theories of emotion, and I aim to show that the evaluative attitude account is closer to the way Xunzi understands emotions. I then show the role ritual practices play in the construction and in the shaping of emotions based on the evaluative attitude account Deonna and Teroni present. I will analyze some of the emotions unique to the Confucian culture to illustrate this point.3.Cultural Constructivism as a Meta-Ethical PositionI turn to explore the meta-ethical issues involved in my interpretation, cultural constructivism, and its substantive implications. I will spell out what I mean by cultural constructivism as a metaethical position, and I will also compare my position with two popular positions in metaethics: moral realism by Parfit and Humean constructivism by Street. My work at this stage will show the strength of cultural constructivism as a meta-ethical position, specifically, it provides a more sophisticated understanding of ethical normativity, which preserves its constructive aspect, as well as making room for the common intuition about moral knowledge: the discovery model. 4.Cultural Constructivism as an interpretation of the Xunzi This part of the work will be primarily based on careful textual analysis on the Xunzi, critical examination of alternative interpretations and comparing them with my own interpretation. The main alternative interpretations I will examine and compare are three different realist interpretations and a constructivist interpretation. I will also address the worry of nihilism and authoritarianism toward a constructivist interpretation of the Xunzi. At the end I integrate the work I have completed in the previous stages, and show how the work on emotions, moral judgment, and ritual practices figure in this interpretation.
關聯 科技部, MOST107-2410-H004-202, 107.08-108.07
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 哲學系
dc.creator (作者) 王華
dc.date (日期) 2019-10
dc.date.accessioned 15-Aug-2024 09:04:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 15-Aug-2024 09:04:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 15-Aug-2024 09:04:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153013-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本計畫承續申請者在目前執行計畫「荀子道德心理學初探」中「探究道德轉化的相關道德心理學議題」這份核心關懷以及執行成果，進一步發展對《荀子》的新詮釋：文化建構論。這個詮釋包含道德心理學與後設倫理學等面向，重心放在釐清人際互動、情感經驗、與禮的實踐在道德判斷、人性詮釋、道德生活、與道德規範性中扮演的角色，因此亦具規範倫理學意涵。本計畫分為四個階段，預計四年完成。第一階段發展此詮釋之道德心理學面向，探討情感在道德判斷中扮演的角色，具體來說進行兩方面工作：1. 藉由檢視其他兩個對《荀子》中道德判斷的重要詮釋並與之比較，強化在前一計畫研究下稍具雛形的「混合道德判斷模型」。2. 藉由檢視一個休姆式情感感知道德判斷模型並與之比較，與其他道德判斷模型進行對話並展示「混合道德判斷模型」的優點與重要性。第二階段進一部釐清《荀子》中對情感的理解，思考其在道德轉化中與禮的關係，並與當今重要情感研究對話。具體來說，這階段將「混合道德判斷模型」中對情感的理解與感知理論、判斷理論、與評價態度理論相比較，從情感研究取得資源探討禮的實踐對情感建構如何可能，並作實例分析。第三階段重心轉向此詮釋之後設倫理學面向，具體來說主要進行兩方面工作：1. 發展受《荀子》文本啟發的一個後設倫理學立場：文化建構論。2. 將此立場與另兩個非常相關的後設倫理學立場（道德實存論、休姆式建構論）相比較，藉此釐清其特色與優點。若能力可及也考慮將此立場與亞里斯多德式建構論相比較，預期會有重要的相似之處。第四階段檢視文化建構論作為《荀子》詮釋的特色與優勢，具體來說主要進行兩方面工作：1. 進行文本分析與釐清工作，並將文化建構論與其他《荀子》相關詮釋作比較，論證其特色與重要性。2. 整合道德心理學面向與後設倫理學兩個面向的成果，完整呈現文化建構論的內容與意涵。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This 4-year project is a natural development from the MOST project that I’m currently executing. It aims to explore issues of moral psychology and meta-ethics in the Xunzi, and its ultimate goal is to develop and defend a position, cultural constructivism, that is inspired by, and a plausible interpretation of, the Xunzi. This position will have its substantive- and meta-ethical implications, as well as a special focus on the nature and the importance of emotions and ritual practices. This project is divided into four stages:1.The Role of Emotions in Moral judgments: A Comparative StudyI build on the “hybrid model” proposed in my previous work on the role emotions play in moral judgment in the Xunzi by (1) further exploring the nature and the function of emotions in the Xunzian model of moral judgment by examining two other contemporary interpretations, one by Van Norden/Hutton, and one by Sung; and (2) compare my Xunzian hybrid model with a contemporary Humean, emotion-based model: Sinhababu’s emotional perception model.2.The Nature of Emotions, Construction, and Ritual Practices: A Comparative StudyI delve deeper into the research of emotions. I aim to answer two questions: the nature of emotions, and the extent to which emotions can be acquired through and constructed by ritual practices. I first examine important contemporary theories of emotion, and I aim to show that the evaluative attitude account is closer to the way Xunzi understands emotions. I then show the role ritual practices play in the construction and in the shaping of emotions based on the evaluative attitude account Deonna and Teroni present. I will analyze some of the emotions unique to the Confucian culture to illustrate this point.3.Cultural Constructivism as a Meta-Ethical PositionI turn to explore the meta-ethical issues involved in my interpretation, cultural constructivism, and its substantive implications. I will spell out what I mean by cultural constructivism as a metaethical position, and I will also compare my position with two popular positions in metaethics: moral realism by Parfit and Humean constructivism by Street. My work at this stage will show the strength of cultural constructivism as a meta-ethical position, specifically, it provides a more sophisticated understanding of ethical normativity, which preserves its constructive aspect, as well as making room for the common intuition about moral knowledge: the discovery model. 4.Cultural Constructivism as an interpretation of the Xunzi This part of the work will be primarily based on careful textual analysis on the Xunzi, critical examination of alternative interpretations and comparing them with my own interpretation. The main alternative interpretations I will examine and compare are three different realist interpretations and a constructivist interpretation. I will also address the worry of nihilism and authoritarianism toward a constructivist interpretation of the Xunzi. At the end I integrate the work I have completed in the previous stages, and show how the work on emotions, moral judgment, and ritual practices figure in this interpretation.
dc.format.extent 116 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 科技部, MOST107-2410-H004-202, 107.08-108.07
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 荀子; 情感; 道德判斷; 禮; 建構論; 規範性
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Xunzi; emotion; moral judgment; li; constructivism; normativity
dc.title (題名) 再探《荀子》中道德心理學與後設倫理學議題
dc.title (題名) Issues of Moral Psychology and Metaethics in the Xunzi: a Further Investigation
dc.type (資料類型) report