Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 非營利組織轉型社會企業使命漂移探討－以路徑依循視角
Exploring the Mission Drift of Non-Profit Organizations Transforming into Social Enterprises - From Path Dependence Perspective作者 黃汝吟
Huang, Ju-Yin貢獻者 江明修
Chiang, Ming-Hsiu
黃汝吟
Huang, Ju-Yin關鍵詞 非營利組織
社會企業
組織轉型
使命漂移
路徑依循
Non-profit organizations
Social enterprises
Organizational transformation
Mission drift
Path dependence日期 2024 上傳時間 4-Sep-2024 13:42:57 (UTC+8) 摘要 非營利組織自政府、市場相繼失靈情境下，由於恰能適時彌補政府服務不足之處，形成夥伴關係，協助解決社會因經濟失衡導致引發諸多社會問題，因而能夠減緩社會不安、促進社會和諧；近年來由於國際經濟、社會、政治局勢變遷迅速，傳統非營利組織由於政府補助以及民間捐款減少而面臨逐漸增加的財務壓力，促使非營利組織尋求財務獨立自給自足，以維持組織生存及永續發展，於是思考轉型社會企業經營之可能性；然而非營利組織專注於社會使命，社會企業除社會公益目標、亦也關注經濟效益，過度關注於創造營收忽略社會使命會導致使命漂移，能否平衡社會與經濟目標成為順利轉型關鍵所在；本研究以路徑依循理論視角結合相關文獻，探討研究個案在轉型過程組織使命、營運能力、人力與財務資源運用各面向避免使命漂移情形，亦探討政府政策及外在民間團體支持體系影響制度變遷，並以非營利組織避免路徑依循，嘗試尋求路徑突破、採取適當策略以順利組織轉型。 因此本研究提出兩點具體研究目的：1. 非營利組織轉型社會企業在組織使命、營運能力、人力財務資源運用與政府政策、外在民間團體支持體系構面分析；2. 以路徑依循理論基礎探討非營利組織轉型社會企業以推展社會使命關鍵因素、避免使命漂移。為了探討研究目的，設計訪談大綱，採質性半結構式深度訪談，研究依據個案分析、結合文獻及訪談結果提出研究發現：1. 非營利組織轉型社會企業發展，優先將社會使命視為核心價值，透過良好治理機制平衡社會目標與經濟目標、突破使命漂移；2. 非營利組織領導者展現社會企業家精神，有助克服路徑依循、促動路徑轉向，透過創造性經營策略順利轉型、同時解決更多社會問題；3. 政府政策及民間支持體系建構社會企業發展生態環境，有利組織運用資源實現社會使命、持續擴大社會影響；並依據研究結果得出：非營利組織路徑轉向，實現財務自主的同時仍不忘社會弱勢關懷、促進社會公平正義，其核心本質皆是社會使命的實現、提升社會福祉。
Beside market failure non-profit organizations make up for the inadequacy of government services as a result of government failure, providing diversified services in areas of social benefit, helping to solve many social problems arising from the economic imbalance, then they could alleviate social unrest and promoting social harmony. In recent years, traditional non-profit organizations have been facing increasing financial pressures of decreasing government subsidies and charitable donations due to rapid changes in the economic, social, and political situations, they consider the possibility of moving towards social enterprises to seek financial independence and self-sufficiency of maintaining sustainable development. However, it's necessary to consider how to balance social and economic goals to avoid too much focus on generating revenue at the expense of social mission lead to mission drift. This research explore the case study of organizational transformation avoiding mission drift from path dependence perspective and presents two research purposes : 1. Analysis of the organizational mission, operational capacity, use of human and financial resources, government policies and external support system of non-profit organizations transforming into social enterprises. 2. To explore the key factors of non-profit organizations transforming into social enterprises to develop social mission and avoid mission drift from based on the theoretical foundation of path dependence. To explore the purpose of research, the interview outline was designed and qualitative semi-structured in-depth interviews, presenting the conclusion based on interview results as below: 1. Non-profit organizations transforming into social enterprises, prioritizing social missions as core values, and balancing social and economic objectives through good governance. 2. non-profit leaders demonstrating social entrepreneurship can help organizational transformation and solve more social problems through creative strategies. 3. Government policies and civil society organizations of support system to build a social enterprise ecosystem are conductive to the use of resources by organizations to achieve social mission and sustainably expand social impact.參考文獻 中文文獻 江明修、陳定銘（2000）。台灣非營利組織政策遊說的途徑與策略。政大公共行政學報，4，153-192。 王秉鈞、鄭勝分、吳佳霖、劉育欣（2013）。我國非營利組織社會企業化之研究。國家發展委員會委託研究報告。 呂育誠（2002）。公共組織變革的另類思惟歷史制度主義觀點的啟示。公共行政學報。7，137-72。 呂炳寬、張峻豪（2009）。制度深化或制度演化：我國中央與地方政府覆議權的比較。臺灣民主季刊，6(4)，169-206。 胡婉玲，2001，〈論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論〉，《新世紀智庫論壇》，(16):86-95。 官有垣、陳錦棠、陸宛蘋、王仕圖，（2013）。社會企業臺灣與香港的比較。高雄：巨流圖書公司。 阮耀啟、陳健民（2018）。由單一走向多元：前瞻香港社會企業發展趨勢。社會分析，(16)，175-201。 胡哲生、陳志遠（2014）。〈社會企業本質、任務與發展〉。收錄於臺灣 社會企業創新創業學會策劃主編,《有溫度的經營社會企業主題論 文集第一輯》。台北市:台灣社會企業創新創業學會,頁3-28。 張力亞、江大樹（2016）。生態城鎮轉型與社會企業：社群創新網絡觀點。國家與社會，(18)，159-200。 劉育欣、鄭勝分（2014）。非營利組織商業化到社會企業化：身心障礙者就業模式的轉化。身心障礙研究季刊，12(1) ，54-66。 陳恆鈞、江慧萍（2010）。樂生事件與新莊捷運線制定之因果關係分析：路徑依賴觀點。東吳政治學報，28(3),129-18。 楊子申、江明修（2022）。社會企業之社會影響力評估指標建構。行政暨政策學報，(74) ，35-68。 郭忠華 (2003)，「新制度主義關於制度變遷研究的三大范式」，天津社會科學，第4期，頁82-86。 黃宗昊（2010）。歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構。問題與研究，49(3)，145-176。 蔡相廷（2010）。歷史制度主義的興起與研究取向－政治學研究途徑的探討。臺北市立教育大學學報. 人文社會類，41(2)，39-76. 蘇子喬 (2010)。台灣憲政體制的變遷軌跡（1991-2010）：歷史制度論的分析。東吳政治學報。28(4)，147-223。 行政院（2014）。社會企業行動方案（103-105 年）。 行政院（2018）。社會企業行動方案（107-111 年）。 勝利廚房公益報告書（2018）。https://reurl.cc/XLA54e。檢索日期：2024/5/05。 勝利基金會網站。https://www.victory.org.tw/timeline/。檢索日期：2024/5/10。 英文文獻 Alter, K. (2007) Social Enterprise Typology, Virtue Ventures LLC. André, K. & Pache, A. (2016). From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise:Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4): 1-17. Arena, M., G. Azzone, and I. Bengo. (2015). Performance Measurement for Social Enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26: 649-672. Arthur, W. B. (1988), Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics, in The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, (Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, 5), Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley. Azmat, F., Ferdous, A. S., & Couchman, P. 2015. Understanding the dynamics between social entrepreneurship and inclusive growth in subsistence marketplaces. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34: 252-271. B Lab. (2019). The complete guide to B Corp certification for small to medium-sized enterprises. B Corporation. URL: https://bcorporation.net/resources/complete-guideb-corp-certification-small-medium-sized-enterprises Bacq, S. & Janssen, F. (2008). From Social Entrepreneurship as a Practice to a Legitimate Field of Research: Literature Review and Classification. Paper presented at the European Summer University Conference on Entrepreneurship, Bodo, Norway. Bagnoli, L.& Megali, C. (2011). Measuring Performance in Social Enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 49-165. Battilana, J., Dorado, S. (2010). Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419- 1440. Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer 2012: 51–56. Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 397–441. Battilana, J., Besharov, M., & Mitzinneck, B. (2017). On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Battilana, J. (2018). Cracking the organizational challenge of pursuing joint social and financial goals: Social enterprise as a laboratory to understand hybrid organizing. Management (Paris, France : 1998), 21, 1278-1305. Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2013). Multiple logics within organizations: An integrative framework and model of organizational hybridity. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Besharov, M.L. (2014). The Relational Ecology of Identification: How Organizational Identification Emerges When Individuals Hold Divergent Values. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1485-1512. Brandstetter, L. and Lehner, O.M. (2015), Opening the market for impact investments: the need for adapted portfolio tools, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5 (2), 87-107. Bull, M., & Ridley-Duff, R. (2019). Towards an appreciation of ethics in social enterprise business models. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 619–634. Chambers, L. (2014). Growing a hybrid venture: Toward a theory of mission drift in social entrepreneurship. Doctoral dissertation. University of St. Gallen. Chmelik, E., Musteen, M. & Ahsan, M. (2015). Measures of performance in the context of international social ventures: An exploratory study, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Published Online. Choi H, Park J, Lee L. (2021). Does State-Driven Social Economy Work? The Case of Community Business in South Korea. Sustainability 13: 1–21. Cornforth, C. (2014). Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(1), 3–20. Coskun M. E., Monroe-White T., Kerlin J. (2019). An updated quantitative analysis of Kerlin’s macro-institutional social enterprise framework. Social Enterprise Journal, 15(1), 111–130. Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 99–124. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T. & Matear, M. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 37-57. Dart, R. (2004). The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14 (4): 411-424. David, Paul A., (1985). C1io and the Economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review 75 (2): 332-337. Dees, J.G. (1998). Enterprising Nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76(2), 55-67. Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. In R. Mosher-Williams (Ed.), Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field, 39–66. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. Department for Trade and Industry (DTI). (2002). Social enterprise: a strategy for success , London : Department for Trade and Industry . Defourny, J., and Nyssens M. (2010), Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1 (1): 32-53. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2012). The emes approach of social enterprises in a comparative perspective. In J. Defourny, L. Hulgard, & V. Pestoff (Eds.), Social enterprise and the third sector: Changing European landscapes in a comparative perspective. 42–65. New York: Routledge. Defourny, J., and Nyssens M. (2016a), How to bring the centres of gravity of the nonprofit sector and the social economy closer to each other, 27, 1547-1552. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 28(6), 2469–2497. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organization: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. Ebrahim, A. and Rangan, V.K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118-141. Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. In Research in Organizational Behavior,34 , 81–100. JAI Press. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64, 132-140. Eiselein, P. & Dentchev, N. A. (2020).. Managing conflicting objectives of social enterprises. Social enterprise journal, 16, 431-451. Fitzgerald, T., & Shepherd, D. (2018). Emerging structures for social enterprises within nonprofits: An institutional logics perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(3), 474–492. Frumkin, P. (2005). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Harvard University Press. Garrow, E. E., & Y. Hasenfeld. (2014). Social Enterprises as an Embodiment of a Neoliberal Welfare Logic. American Behavioral Scientist 58 (11): 1475–93. Germak, A. J., & Robinson, J. A. (2014). Exploring the motivation of nascent social entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 5-21. Gorges, Michael J. (2001). New institutionalist explanations for institutional change: A note of caution. Politics 21 (2): 137-45. Grant HM, Crutchfield LR (2007) Creating high-impact nonprofits. Standford Social Innovation Review 5: 32–41. Grant A.M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417. Greenwood R., Raynard M., Kodeih F., Micelotta E.R., Lounsbury M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. Grieco, C. (2015). Assessing Social Impact of Social Enterprises: Does One Size Really Fit All?. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. Giedrė Raišienė, A., & Urmanavičienė, A. (2017). Mission drift in a hybrid organization: How can social business combine its dual goals? Management of Interorganizational collaboration View project Research on HRM: work engagement. Hall, P. A. and R. C. R. Taylor (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, Political Studies, 44, (5), 936–957. Harrison Y. D., Murray V. (2012). Perspectives on the leadership of chairs of nonprofit organization boards of directors: a grounded theory mixed-method study. Nonprofit Manage. Leadersh. 22, 411–437. Immergut, Ellen M. (1998). The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and Society, Vol. 26P:5-34. Jackson, SJ & Harrison, GJ (2011). Social Entrepreneurship: Concepts and Implications for Problem solving, Social entrepreneurship, pp. 1-24. Jenner, P. (2016). Social enterprise sustainability revisited: An international perspective. Social Enterprise Journal, 12(1), 42–60. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy. Kerlin, J. A. (2013). Defining Social Enterprise Across Different Contexts: A Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 42 , 84 – 108. Kim, M., Charles, C., & Pettijohn, S. L. (2019). Challenges in the use of performance data in management: Results of a national survey of human service nonprofit organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(5), 1085–1111. Klein, S., Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2020). How to stay on the road? A business model perspective on mission drift in social purpose organizations. Journal of Business Research. In press. Ko, WW. & Liu, G. (2015). Understanding the process of knowledge spillovers: the learning to become social enterprises. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9: 263–285. Ko, W.W., and Liu, G. (2020). The Transformation from Traditional Nonprofit Organizations to Social Enterprises: An Institutional Entrepreneurship Perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 15-32. Lashitew, A. A., van Tulder, R., & Muche L. (2022). Social value creation in institutional voids: A business model perspective. Business & Society, 61, 1992–2037. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. and Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52–58. Litrico, Jean-Baptiste, and Marya L. Besharov. (2019). Unpacking Variation in Hybrid Organizational Forms: Changing Models of Social Enterprise Among Nonprofits, 2000–2013. Journal of Business Ethics 159.2: 343-360. Liu, G., Eng, T. Y., & Takeda, S. (2015). An investigation of marketing capabilities in third sector: A study of British and Japanese social enterprise. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 267–298. Lowndes, V. (2002). Institutionalism in D. March and S. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 90–108. Luke, B., Barraket, J. & Eversole, R. (2013). Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures, Performance evaluation of social enterprise, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10(3- 4), 234-258. Lumpkin, G. T., T. W. Moss, D. M. Gras, S. Kato & A. S. Amezcua. (2013). Entrepreneurial Processes in Social Contexts: How Are They Different, If at All? Small Business Economics 40 (3): 761–783. Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like a systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,45(1), 64–86. Mahoney, James. (2001). The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. A. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney, & K. A. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power.1-37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mair, J. & Martí, I. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. Meadows M., Pike M. (2010). Performance management for social enterprises. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(2), 127–141. Mair, J., & Noboa, E. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: How Intentions to Create a Social Venture are Formed. In Social Entrepreneurship, 121–135. Mair, Johanna, Jeffery Robinson and Kai Hockerts (eds.) (2006). Social Entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Massarsky, C. W. (2006), Coming of Age: Social Enterprise Reaches its Tipping Point, in Research on Social Enterpreneurship ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series, 1(3), 67-88. Morris, M. H., Coombes, S., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of entrepreneurial and market orientations in a non-profit context: theoretical and empirical insights. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 12–39. Morris, M. H., Santos, S. C. & Kuratko, D. F. (2020). The great divides in social entrepreneurship and where they lead us. Small Business Economics, 57, 1089-1106. Moizer, J. & Tracey, P. (2010). Strategy Making in Social Enterprise: The Role of Resource Allocation and Its Effects on Organizational Sustainability, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(3), 252-266. Moulaert F., O Ailenei (2005), Social Economy, Third Sector and Solidarity Relations: A Conceptual Synthesis from History to Present, Urban Studies, 42(11): 2037–2053. Moxham C. (2014). Understanding third sector performance measurement system design: a literature review. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manage. 63, 704–726. Mulgan, Geoff. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 1 (2): 145–62. Mulyaningsih, H.D., Yudoko, G. and Rudito, B. (2014). Initial conceptual model of knowledge-based social innovation, World Applied Sciences Journal, 30 (30), 256–262. Munshi, N. V. (2010). Value creation, social innovation, and entrepreneurship in global economies. J. Asia Pac. Bus., 11(3), 160-165. Nicholls, A. (2009). We do good things, don’t we? : Blended Value Accounting in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 755–769. Nicholls A. (2010b). Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 394–415. Nicholls A. (2010c). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 70–100. Nga J. K. H., & Shamuganathan G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259–282. Nguyen, L., Szkudlarek, B., & Seymour, R. G. (2015). Social impact measurement in social enterprises: An interdependence perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32(4), 224-237. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. Noruzi M. R., Westover J. R., Rahimi G. R. (2010). An exploration of social entrepreneurship in the entrepreneurship Era. Asian Social Science, 6(6), 4-10. OECD. (2003). The Non-Profit Sector in Changing Economy. OECD. Ormiston J., Seymour R. (2011). Understanding value creation in social entrepreneurship: The importance of aligning mission, strategy and impact measurement. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 125–150. Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. Parker, S. C., Gamble, E. N., Moroz, P. W., & Branzei, O. (2019). The impact of B lab certification on firm growth. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(1), 57–77. Peters, B. Guy (1999) Institutional Theory in Political Science (London: Pinter). Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-267. Pierson, Paul, (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pullman, M., Longoni, A., and Luzzini, D. (2018). Emerging discourse incubator: The roles of institutional complexity and hybridity in social impact supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(2), 3–20. Rahmani, Z., Moakher, A., Sedaghat, M., & Daigahi, H. (2012). The survey of corporate entrepreneurship barriers: Case study; mazandaran hydro co. American Journal of Scientific Research, 43(1), 116-124. Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). Stakeholders Matter: How Social Enterprises Address Mission Drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 143. Reficco, E., Layrisse, F. & Barrios, A. (2020). From donation-based NPO to social enterprise: A journey of transformation through business-model innovation. Journal of Business Research, 125, 720-732. Roumpi, D., Magrizos, S., & Nicolopoulou, K. (2019). Virtuous circle: Human capital and human resource management in social enterprises. Human Resource Management. Salamon, L. M. (1992). America's Nonprofit Sector: A Primer, Foundation Center, New York. Salamon, L. M. (ed.) (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. NY.: Oxford University Press. Samkin, G., & Schneider, A. (2010). Accountability, narrative reporting and legitimation: The case of a New Zealand public benefit entity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23, 256 – 289. Sanders, M. L. & McClellan, J. G. (2014). Being Business-Like While Pursuing a Social Mission: Acknowledging the Inherent Tensions in US Nonprofit Organizing. Organization, 21, 68-89. Schaltegger S., Beckmann M., B E. (2013). Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability. Mapping the field. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 219-229. Scheiber, L. (2016). How Social Entrepreneurs in the Third Sector Learn from Life Experiences. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27 (4): 1694– 1717. Singh, S. K. & Gaur, S. S. (2018). Entrepreneurship and innovation management in emerging economies. Manag. Decis. 56, 2–5. Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407–442. Smith, W.K. & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Bowing before dual gods: how structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 1–44. Somers, A. B. (2005). Shaping the balanced scorecard for use in UK social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 43–56. Sontag-Padilla, L.M., Staplefoote, L., Morganti K.G. (2012). Financial Sustainability for Nonprofit Organizations – A Review of the Literature. Staessens, M., P. J. Kerstens, J. Bruneel, & L. Cherchye. (2019). Data envelopment analysis and social enterprises: Analysing performance, strategic orientation and mission drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 325–341. Steinmo, S. (2008). What is historical institutionalism? In D. D. Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches in the social sciences, 150-178. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Stephan U., Patterson M., Kelly C., Mair J. (2016). Organizations driving positive social change: A review and an integrative framework of change processes. Journal of Management, 42, 1250–1281. S.C. Berzin, M. Pitt-Catsouphes, P. Gaitan-Rossi (2015). Defining our own future: Human service leaders on social innovation. Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership and Governance, 39 (5), 412-425. Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics 16 (January): 223-246. Tao, J. (2016). A Literature Review on Institutional Change and Entrepreneurship. Open Journal of Business and Management, 4, 629-648. Teasdale, S. (2010). How Can Social Enterprise Address Disadvantage? Evidence from an Inner City Community, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22, 2, 89-107. TEPSIE (2014). Social innovation theory and research: A summary of the findings from TEPSIE. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research. Kathleen and Steinmo, Sven. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 1-30. Toepler, S. (2006). Caveat venditor? Museum merchandising, nonprofit commercialization, and the case of the metropolitan museum in New York. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17(2), 99–113. Tien, N.H., Anh, D. B. H., Ngoc, N. M., & Do Thi, Y. N. (2019). Sustainable social entrepreneurship in Vietnam. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(3), 1-12. Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Haugh, H. (2005). Beyond philanthropy: Community enterprise as a basis for corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4): 327–344. Tracey, P., Phillips, N. & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model. Organization Science, 225(1), 60-80. Vacekova, G. (2017). Rethinking Nonprofit Commercialization : The Case of the Czech Republic. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28 (5): 2103– 2123. Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. (2012). Competitive strategy in socially entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations: Innovation and differentiation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 91–101. Westley F., Antadze N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), article 2. Word, J.K.A. and Sowa, J.E. (2017). The Nonprofit Human Resource Management Handbook: From Theory to Practice, Taylor & Francis, New York. Young, D.R., Kerlin, J.A., Teasdale, S. and Soh, J. (2012). The Dynamics and Long Term Stability of Social Enterprise, in J. Kickul and S. Bacq (eds.) Patterns in Social Entrepreneurship Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Young D. R., Kim C. (2015). Can social enterprises remain sustainable and missionfocused? Applying resiliency theory. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(3), 233–259. Zacca, R., & Dayan, M. (2018). Linking managerial competence to small enterprise performance within the dynamic capability logic. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(2), 256-276. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
111256021資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111256021 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 江明修 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chiang, Ming-Hsiu en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃汝吟 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Huang, Ju-Yin en_US dc.creator (作者) 黃汝吟 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Huang, Ju-Yin en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-Sep-2024 13:42:57 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-Sep-2024 13:42:57 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Sep-2024 13:42:57 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0111256021 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153072 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 公共行政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 111256021 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 非營利組織自政府、市場相繼失靈情境下，由於恰能適時彌補政府服務不足之處，形成夥伴關係，協助解決社會因經濟失衡導致引發諸多社會問題，因而能夠減緩社會不安、促進社會和諧；近年來由於國際經濟、社會、政治局勢變遷迅速，傳統非營利組織由於政府補助以及民間捐款減少而面臨逐漸增加的財務壓力，促使非營利組織尋求財務獨立自給自足，以維持組織生存及永續發展，於是思考轉型社會企業經營之可能性；然而非營利組織專注於社會使命，社會企業除社會公益目標、亦也關注經濟效益，過度關注於創造營收忽略社會使命會導致使命漂移，能否平衡社會與經濟目標成為順利轉型關鍵所在；本研究以路徑依循理論視角結合相關文獻，探討研究個案在轉型過程組織使命、營運能力、人力與財務資源運用各面向避免使命漂移情形，亦探討政府政策及外在民間團體支持體系影響制度變遷，並以非營利組織避免路徑依循，嘗試尋求路徑突破、採取適當策略以順利組織轉型。 因此本研究提出兩點具體研究目的：1. 非營利組織轉型社會企業在組織使命、營運能力、人力財務資源運用與政府政策、外在民間團體支持體系構面分析；2. 以路徑依循理論基礎探討非營利組織轉型社會企業以推展社會使命關鍵因素、避免使命漂移。為了探討研究目的，設計訪談大綱，採質性半結構式深度訪談，研究依據個案分析、結合文獻及訪談結果提出研究發現：1. 非營利組織轉型社會企業發展，優先將社會使命視為核心價值，透過良好治理機制平衡社會目標與經濟目標、突破使命漂移；2. 非營利組織領導者展現社會企業家精神，有助克服路徑依循、促動路徑轉向，透過創造性經營策略順利轉型、同時解決更多社會問題；3. 政府政策及民間支持體系建構社會企業發展生態環境，有利組織運用資源實現社會使命、持續擴大社會影響；並依據研究結果得出：非營利組織路徑轉向，實現財務自主的同時仍不忘社會弱勢關懷、促進社會公平正義，其核心本質皆是社會使命的實現、提升社會福祉。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Beside market failure non-profit organizations make up for the inadequacy of government services as a result of government failure, providing diversified services in areas of social benefit, helping to solve many social problems arising from the economic imbalance, then they could alleviate social unrest and promoting social harmony. In recent years, traditional non-profit organizations have been facing increasing financial pressures of decreasing government subsidies and charitable donations due to rapid changes in the economic, social, and political situations, they consider the possibility of moving towards social enterprises to seek financial independence and self-sufficiency of maintaining sustainable development. However, it's necessary to consider how to balance social and economic goals to avoid too much focus on generating revenue at the expense of social mission lead to mission drift. This research explore the case study of organizational transformation avoiding mission drift from path dependence perspective and presents two research purposes : 1. Analysis of the organizational mission, operational capacity, use of human and financial resources, government policies and external support system of non-profit organizations transforming into social enterprises. 2. To explore the key factors of non-profit organizations transforming into social enterprises to develop social mission and avoid mission drift from based on the theoretical foundation of path dependence. To explore the purpose of research, the interview outline was designed and qualitative semi-structured in-depth interviews, presenting the conclusion based on interview results as below: 1. Non-profit organizations transforming into social enterprises, prioritizing social missions as core values, and balancing social and economic objectives through good governance. 2. non-profit leaders demonstrating social entrepreneurship can help organizational transformation and solve more social problems through creative strategies. 3. Government policies and civil society organizations of support system to build a social enterprise ecosystem are conductive to the use of resources by organizations to achieve social mission and sustainably expand social impact. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 名詞釋義與章節安排 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 從非營利組織到社會企業 9 第二節 路徑依循、制度變遷 18 第三節 轉型路徑突破與因應 33 第四節 小結 44 第三章 研究設計與實施 46 第一節 研究設計 46 第二節 研究實施 48 第三節 路徑歷史演進脈絡 51 第四章 組織轉型歷程發展 55 第一節、路徑依循架構分析 55 第二節、關鍵因素分析 65 第五章 突破使命漂移分析 77 第一節 政府政策與外在民間團體支持體系 77 一、支持生態體系 77 二、法規與政策制度 82 三、認證制度 88 四、透明度與問責制 94 第二節 組織使命 107 第三節 營運能力 115 第四節 人力資源運用 126 第五節 財務資源運用 138 第六節 小結 148 第六章 結論 150 第一節 研究發現 150 第二節 結論 163 第三節 政策建議 167 參考文獻 169 zh_TW dc.format.extent 4582941 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111256021 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 非營利組織 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會企業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織轉型 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 使命漂移 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 路徑依循 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Non-profit organizations en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social enterprises en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Organizational transformation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mission drift en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Path dependence en_US dc.title (題名) 非營利組織轉型社會企業使命漂移探討－以路徑依循視角 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Exploring the Mission Drift of Non-Profit Organizations Transforming into Social Enterprises - From Path Dependence Perspective en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻 江明修、陳定銘（2000）。台灣非營利組織政策遊說的途徑與策略。政大公共行政學報，4，153-192。 王秉鈞、鄭勝分、吳佳霖、劉育欣（2013）。我國非營利組織社會企業化之研究。國家發展委員會委託研究報告。 呂育誠（2002）。公共組織變革的另類思惟歷史制度主義觀點的啟示。公共行政學報。7，137-72。 呂炳寬、張峻豪（2009）。制度深化或制度演化：我國中央與地方政府覆議權的比較。臺灣民主季刊，6(4)，169-206。 胡婉玲，2001，〈論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論〉，《新世紀智庫論壇》，(16):86-95。 官有垣、陳錦棠、陸宛蘋、王仕圖，（2013）。社會企業臺灣與香港的比較。高雄：巨流圖書公司。 阮耀啟、陳健民（2018）。由單一走向多元：前瞻香港社會企業發展趨勢。社會分析，(16)，175-201。 胡哲生、陳志遠（2014）。〈社會企業本質、任務與發展〉。收錄於臺灣 社會企業創新創業學會策劃主編,《有溫度的經營社會企業主題論 文集第一輯》。台北市:台灣社會企業創新創業學會,頁3-28。 張力亞、江大樹（2016）。生態城鎮轉型與社會企業：社群創新網絡觀點。國家與社會，(18)，159-200。 劉育欣、鄭勝分（2014）。非營利組織商業化到社會企業化：身心障礙者就業模式的轉化。身心障礙研究季刊，12(1) ，54-66。 陳恆鈞、江慧萍（2010）。樂生事件與新莊捷運線制定之因果關係分析：路徑依賴觀點。東吳政治學報，28(3),129-18。 楊子申、江明修（2022）。社會企業之社會影響力評估指標建構。行政暨政策學報，(74) ，35-68。 郭忠華 (2003)，「新制度主義關於制度變遷研究的三大范式」，天津社會科學，第4期，頁82-86。 黃宗昊（2010）。歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構。問題與研究，49(3)，145-176。 蔡相廷（2010）。歷史制度主義的興起與研究取向－政治學研究途徑的探討。臺北市立教育大學學報. 人文社會類，41(2)，39-76. 蘇子喬 (2010)。台灣憲政體制的變遷軌跡（1991-2010）：歷史制度論的分析。東吳政治學報。28(4)，147-223。 行政院（2014）。社會企業行動方案（103-105 年）。 行政院（2018）。社會企業行動方案（107-111 年）。 勝利廚房公益報告書（2018）。https://reurl.cc/XLA54e。檢索日期：2024/5/05。 勝利基金會網站。https://www.victory.org.tw/timeline/。檢索日期：2024/5/10。 英文文獻 Alter, K. (2007) Social Enterprise Typology, Virtue Ventures LLC. André, K. & Pache, A. (2016). From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise:Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4): 1-17. Arena, M., G. Azzone, and I. Bengo. (2015). Performance Measurement for Social Enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26: 649-672. Arthur, W. B. (1988), Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics, in The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, (Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, 5), Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley. Azmat, F., Ferdous, A. S., & Couchman, P. 2015. Understanding the dynamics between social entrepreneurship and inclusive growth in subsistence marketplaces. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34: 252-271. B Lab. (2019). The complete guide to B Corp certification for small to medium-sized enterprises. B Corporation. URL: https://bcorporation.net/resources/complete-guideb-corp-certification-small-medium-sized-enterprises Bacq, S. & Janssen, F. (2008). From Social Entrepreneurship as a Practice to a Legitimate Field of Research: Literature Review and Classification. Paper presented at the European Summer University Conference on Entrepreneurship, Bodo, Norway. Bagnoli, L.& Megali, C. (2011). Measuring Performance in Social Enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 49-165. Battilana, J., Dorado, S. (2010). Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419- 1440. Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer 2012: 51–56. Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 397–441. Battilana, J., Besharov, M., & Mitzinneck, B. (2017). On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Battilana, J. (2018). Cracking the organizational challenge of pursuing joint social and financial goals: Social enterprise as a laboratory to understand hybrid organizing. Management (Paris, France : 1998), 21, 1278-1305. Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2013). Multiple logics within organizations: An integrative framework and model of organizational hybridity. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Besharov, M.L. (2014). The Relational Ecology of Identification: How Organizational Identification Emerges When Individuals Hold Divergent Values. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1485-1512. Brandstetter, L. and Lehner, O.M. (2015), Opening the market for impact investments: the need for adapted portfolio tools, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5 (2), 87-107. Bull, M., & Ridley-Duff, R. (2019). Towards an appreciation of ethics in social enterprise business models. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 619–634. Chambers, L. (2014). Growing a hybrid venture: Toward a theory of mission drift in social entrepreneurship. Doctoral dissertation. University of St. Gallen. Chmelik, E., Musteen, M. & Ahsan, M. (2015). Measures of performance in the context of international social ventures: An exploratory study, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Published Online. Choi H, Park J, Lee L. (2021). Does State-Driven Social Economy Work? The Case of Community Business in South Korea. Sustainability 13: 1–21. Cornforth, C. (2014). Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(1), 3–20. Coskun M. E., Monroe-White T., Kerlin J. (2019). An updated quantitative analysis of Kerlin’s macro-institutional social enterprise framework. Social Enterprise Journal, 15(1), 111–130. Costa, E., & Pesci, C. (2016). Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 99–124. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T. & Matear, M. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 37-57. Dart, R. (2004). The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14 (4): 411-424. David, Paul A., (1985). C1io and the Economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review 75 (2): 332-337. Dees, J.G. (1998). Enterprising Nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76(2), 55-67. Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. In R. Mosher-Williams (Ed.), Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field, 39–66. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. Department for Trade and Industry (DTI). (2002). Social enterprise: a strategy for success , London : Department for Trade and Industry . Defourny, J., and Nyssens M. (2010), Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1 (1): 32-53. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2012). The emes approach of social enterprises in a comparative perspective. In J. Defourny, L. Hulgard, & V. Pestoff (Eds.), Social enterprise and the third sector: Changing European landscapes in a comparative perspective. 42–65. New York: Routledge. Defourny, J., and Nyssens M. (2016a), How to bring the centres of gravity of the nonprofit sector and the social economy closer to each other, 27, 1547-1552. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 28(6), 2469–2497. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organization: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. Ebrahim, A. and Rangan, V.K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118-141. Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. In Research in Organizational Behavior,34 , 81–100. JAI Press. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64, 132-140. Eiselein, P. & Dentchev, N. A. (2020).. Managing conflicting objectives of social enterprises. Social enterprise journal, 16, 431-451. Fitzgerald, T., & Shepherd, D. (2018). Emerging structures for social enterprises within nonprofits: An institutional logics perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(3), 474–492. Frumkin, P. (2005). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Harvard University Press. Garrow, E. E., & Y. Hasenfeld. (2014). Social Enterprises as an Embodiment of a Neoliberal Welfare Logic. American Behavioral Scientist 58 (11): 1475–93. Germak, A. J., & Robinson, J. A. (2014). Exploring the motivation of nascent social entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 5-21. Gorges, Michael J. (2001). New institutionalist explanations for institutional change: A note of caution. Politics 21 (2): 137-45. Grant HM, Crutchfield LR (2007) Creating high-impact nonprofits. Standford Social Innovation Review 5: 32–41. Grant A.M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417. Greenwood R., Raynard M., Kodeih F., Micelotta E.R., Lounsbury M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. Grieco, C. (2015). Assessing Social Impact of Social Enterprises: Does One Size Really Fit All?. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. Giedrė Raišienė, A., & Urmanavičienė, A. (2017). Mission drift in a hybrid organization: How can social business combine its dual goals? Management of Interorganizational collaboration View project Research on HRM: work engagement. Hall, P. A. and R. C. R. Taylor (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, Political Studies, 44, (5), 936–957. Harrison Y. D., Murray V. (2012). Perspectives on the leadership of chairs of nonprofit organization boards of directors: a grounded theory mixed-method study. Nonprofit Manage. Leadersh. 22, 411–437. Immergut, Ellen M. (1998). The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and Society, Vol. 26P:5-34. Jackson, SJ & Harrison, GJ (2011). Social Entrepreneurship: Concepts and Implications for Problem solving, Social entrepreneurship, pp. 1-24. Jenner, P. (2016). Social enterprise sustainability revisited: An international perspective. Social Enterprise Journal, 12(1), 42–60. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy. Kerlin, J. A. (2013). Defining Social Enterprise Across Different Contexts: A Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 42 , 84 – 108. Kim, M., Charles, C., & Pettijohn, S. L. (2019). Challenges in the use of performance data in management: Results of a national survey of human service nonprofit organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(5), 1085–1111. Klein, S., Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2020). How to stay on the road? A business model perspective on mission drift in social purpose organizations. Journal of Business Research. In press. Ko, WW. & Liu, G. (2015). Understanding the process of knowledge spillovers: the learning to become social enterprises. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9: 263–285. Ko, W.W., and Liu, G. (2020). The Transformation from Traditional Nonprofit Organizations to Social Enterprises: An Institutional Entrepreneurship Perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 15-32. Lashitew, A. A., van Tulder, R., & Muche L. (2022). Social value creation in institutional voids: A business model perspective. Business & Society, 61, 1992–2037. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. and Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52–58. Litrico, Jean-Baptiste, and Marya L. Besharov. (2019). Unpacking Variation in Hybrid Organizational Forms: Changing Models of Social Enterprise Among Nonprofits, 2000–2013. Journal of Business Ethics 159.2: 343-360. Liu, G., Eng, T. Y., & Takeda, S. (2015). An investigation of marketing capabilities in third sector: A study of British and Japanese social enterprise. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 267–298. Lowndes, V. (2002). Institutionalism in D. March and S. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 90–108. Luke, B., Barraket, J. & Eversole, R. (2013). Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures, Performance evaluation of social enterprise, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10(3- 4), 234-258. Lumpkin, G. T., T. W. Moss, D. M. Gras, S. Kato & A. S. Amezcua. (2013). Entrepreneurial Processes in Social Contexts: How Are They Different, If at All? Small Business Economics 40 (3): 761–783. Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like a systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,45(1), 64–86. Mahoney, James. (2001). The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. A. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney, & K. A. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power.1-37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mair, J. & Martí, I. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. Meadows M., Pike M. (2010). Performance management for social enterprises. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(2), 127–141. Mair, J., & Noboa, E. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: How Intentions to Create a Social Venture are Formed. In Social Entrepreneurship, 121–135. Mair, Johanna, Jeffery Robinson and Kai Hockerts (eds.) (2006). Social Entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Massarsky, C. W. (2006), Coming of Age: Social Enterprise Reaches its Tipping Point, in Research on Social Enterpreneurship ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series, 1(3), 67-88. Morris, M. H., Coombes, S., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of entrepreneurial and market orientations in a non-profit context: theoretical and empirical insights. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 12–39. Morris, M. H., Santos, S. C. & Kuratko, D. F. (2020). The great divides in social entrepreneurship and where they lead us. Small Business Economics, 57, 1089-1106. Moizer, J. & Tracey, P. (2010). Strategy Making in Social Enterprise: The Role of Resource Allocation and Its Effects on Organizational Sustainability, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(3), 252-266. Moulaert F., O Ailenei (2005), Social Economy, Third Sector and Solidarity Relations: A Conceptual Synthesis from History to Present, Urban Studies, 42(11): 2037–2053. Moxham C. (2014). Understanding third sector performance measurement system design: a literature review. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manage. 63, 704–726. Mulgan, Geoff. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 1 (2): 145–62. Mulyaningsih, H.D., Yudoko, G. and Rudito, B. (2014). Initial conceptual model of knowledge-based social innovation, World Applied Sciences Journal, 30 (30), 256–262. Munshi, N. V. (2010). Value creation, social innovation, and entrepreneurship in global economies. J. Asia Pac. Bus., 11(3), 160-165. Nicholls, A. (2009). We do good things, don’t we? : Blended Value Accounting in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 755–769. Nicholls A. (2010b). Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 394–415. Nicholls A. (2010c). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 70–100. Nga J. K. H., & Shamuganathan G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259–282. Nguyen, L., Szkudlarek, B., & Seymour, R. G. (2015). Social impact measurement in social enterprises: An interdependence perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 32(4), 224-237. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. Noruzi M. R., Westover J. R., Rahimi G. R. (2010). An exploration of social entrepreneurship in the entrepreneurship Era. Asian Social Science, 6(6), 4-10. OECD. (2003). The Non-Profit Sector in Changing Economy. OECD. Ormiston J., Seymour R. (2011). Understanding value creation in social entrepreneurship: The importance of aligning mission, strategy and impact measurement. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 125–150. Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. Parker, S. C., Gamble, E. N., Moroz, P. W., & Branzei, O. (2019). The impact of B lab certification on firm growth. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(1), 57–77. Peters, B. Guy (1999) Institutional Theory in Political Science (London: Pinter). Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-267. Pierson, Paul, (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pullman, M., Longoni, A., and Luzzini, D. (2018). Emerging discourse incubator: The roles of institutional complexity and hybridity in social impact supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(2), 3–20. Rahmani, Z., Moakher, A., Sedaghat, M., & Daigahi, H. (2012). The survey of corporate entrepreneurship barriers: Case study; mazandaran hydro co. American Journal of Scientific Research, 43(1), 116-124. Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). Stakeholders Matter: How Social Enterprises Address Mission Drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 143. Reficco, E., Layrisse, F. & Barrios, A. (2020). From donation-based NPO to social enterprise: A journey of transformation through business-model innovation. Journal of Business Research, 125, 720-732. Roumpi, D., Magrizos, S., & Nicolopoulou, K. (2019). Virtuous circle: Human capital and human resource management in social enterprises. Human Resource Management. Salamon, L. M. (1992). America's Nonprofit Sector: A Primer, Foundation Center, New York. Salamon, L. M. (ed.) (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. NY.: Oxford University Press. Samkin, G., & Schneider, A. (2010). Accountability, narrative reporting and legitimation: The case of a New Zealand public benefit entity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23, 256 – 289. Sanders, M. L. & McClellan, J. G. (2014). Being Business-Like While Pursuing a Social Mission: Acknowledging the Inherent Tensions in US Nonprofit Organizing. Organization, 21, 68-89. Schaltegger S., Beckmann M., B E. (2013). Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability. Mapping the field. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 219-229. Scheiber, L. (2016). How Social Entrepreneurs in the Third Sector Learn from Life Experiences. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27 (4): 1694– 1717. Singh, S. K. & Gaur, S. S. (2018). Entrepreneurship and innovation management in emerging economies. Manag. Decis. 56, 2–5. Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407–442. Smith, W.K. & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Bowing before dual gods: how structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 1–44. Somers, A. B. (2005). Shaping the balanced scorecard for use in UK social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 43–56. Sontag-Padilla, L.M., Staplefoote, L., Morganti K.G. (2012). Financial Sustainability for Nonprofit Organizations – A Review of the Literature. Staessens, M., P. J. Kerstens, J. Bruneel, & L. Cherchye. (2019). Data envelopment analysis and social enterprises: Analysing performance, strategic orientation and mission drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 325–341. Steinmo, S. (2008). What is historical institutionalism? In D. D. Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches in the social sciences, 150-178. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Stephan U., Patterson M., Kelly C., Mair J. (2016). Organizations driving positive social change: A review and an integrative framework of change processes. Journal of Management, 42, 1250–1281. S.C. Berzin, M. Pitt-Catsouphes, P. Gaitan-Rossi (2015). Defining our own future: Human service leaders on social innovation. Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership and Governance, 39 (5), 412-425. Krasner, S. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics 16 (January): 223-246. Tao, J. (2016). A Literature Review on Institutional Change and Entrepreneurship. Open Journal of Business and Management, 4, 629-648. Teasdale, S. (2010). How Can Social Enterprise Address Disadvantage? Evidence from an Inner City Community, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22, 2, 89-107. TEPSIE (2014). Social innovation theory and research: A summary of the findings from TEPSIE. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research. Kathleen and Steinmo, Sven. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 1-30. Toepler, S. (2006). Caveat venditor? Museum merchandising, nonprofit commercialization, and the case of the metropolitan museum in New York. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17(2), 99–113. Tien, N.H., Anh, D. B. H., Ngoc, N. M., & Do Thi, Y. N. (2019). Sustainable social entrepreneurship in Vietnam. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(3), 1-12. Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Haugh, H. (2005). Beyond philanthropy: Community enterprise as a basis for corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4): 327–344. Tracey, P., Phillips, N. & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model. Organization Science, 225(1), 60-80. Vacekova, G. (2017). Rethinking Nonprofit Commercialization : The Case of the Czech Republic. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28 (5): 2103– 2123. Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. (2012). Competitive strategy in socially entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations: Innovation and differentiation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 91–101. Westley F., Antadze N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), article 2. Word, J.K.A. and Sowa, J.E. (2017). The Nonprofit Human Resource Management Handbook: From Theory to Practice, Taylor & Francis, New York. Young, D.R., Kerlin, J.A., Teasdale, S. and Soh, J. (2012). The Dynamics and Long Term Stability of Social Enterprise, in J. Kickul and S. Bacq (eds.) Patterns in Social Entrepreneurship Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Young D. R., Kim C. (2015). Can social enterprises remain sustainable and missionfocused? Applying resiliency theory. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(3), 233–259. Zacca, R., & Dayan, M. (2018). Linking managerial competence to small enterprise performance within the dynamic capability logic. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(2), 256-276. zh_TW
