學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 新創社會企業與創業生態系之互動關係 —台歐比較研究
Interaction Between Social Enterprise Start-up and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem—A Comparative Study Between Taiwan and Europe作者 許家瑄
Hsu, Chia-Hsuan貢獻者 鄭至甫
Jeng, Jyh-Fu
許家瑄
Hsu, Chia-Hsuan關鍵詞 社會企業
創業生態系
永續發展
電子商務
循環包裝
Social enterprise
Entrepreneurial ecosystem
Sustainable development
E-commerce
Circular packaging日期 2024 上傳時間 4-九月-2024 13:59:05 (UTC+8) 摘要 近年來，全球面臨日益嚴峻的社會與環境問題，聯合國因而提出了17項永續發展目標，期望在2030年實現，這些目標已成為世界各國政府高度關注的議題。透過新創社會企業提出的社會創新方法有助於緩解或甚至解決眾多迫在眉睫的重大挑戰。而創業生態系統在新創企業的成長過程中扮演重要角色，然而過往文獻研究多著重在以利潤為導向的傳業活動，對於社會創新創業者的需求則不甚了解。因此本研究以Isenberg所提出的創業生態系統架構作為基礎，探討新創社會企業在成長歷程中如何與創業生態系統中的資源互動，進一步分析其在成長過程中可能產生出資源需求與缺口。 本研究以電子商務產業作為研究背景，並以台灣與歐洲代表性循環包裝新創社會企業作為比較個案，旨在深入探討不同的社會文化與環境背景下，新創社會企業的與創業生態系統資源互動關係有何異同，希望能為創業生態系統參與者提供實務建議，從而推動台灣創業生態系統朝向更有利於社會企業發展的方向前進。 本研究發現，相較於以利潤為導向的新創企業，社會企業更為注重各項資源中社會網絡的連結及宣傳機會，而參與創新創業競賽亦帶來資金補助、人脈建立、提升團隊知名度等正向效益。在市場面向上，尋找早期消費者與合作夥伴應從具相同理念的小型企業開始，而能進一步與政府及大型企業的合作，主要在於永續議題的興起。另外，從台歐比較中發現，對台灣新創社會企業而言，政府的長期支持是其持續成長的關鍵因素，然而，在文化及人才方面則較為弱勢。相反的，歐洲新創社會企業，文化因素是其能發展的重要關鍵，而歐盟各國制定的法規不一致性，則成為長期發展下會遇到的困難。
In recent years, the world has encountered increasingly severe social and environmental challenges. In response, the United Nations has introduced 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), intended to be achieved by 2030. These goals have garnered significant attention from governments globally. The social innovation approaches advanced by Social Enterprise start-ups have the potential to mitigate or even resolve many of these urgent and critical challenges. The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem plays a crucial role in the growth of startups. However, existing literature has predominantly focused on profit-driven entrepreneurial activities, with a limited understanding of the needs of social innovation entrepreneurs. Therefore, the study employs Isenberg's entrepreneurial ecosystem framework as a foundation to explore how social enterprise start-ups interact with the resources within the entrepreneurial ecosystem during their growth process. Furthermore, it analyzes the potential resource demands and gaps that may arise throughout their development. This study examines the e-commerce industry as the research context, focusing on a comparative case analysis of representative circular packaging social enterprise start-ups in Taiwan and Europe. The aim is to delve into the similarities and differences in how social enterprise start-ups interact with the resources of the entrepreneurial ecosystem under varying social, cultural, and environmental backgrounds. The study seeks to offer practical recommendations for participants in the entrepreneurial ecosystem, thereby fostering the development of Taiwan’s entrepreneurial ecosystem in a way that is more conducive to the growth of social enterprises. The study finds that, compared to profit-driven startups, social enterprises emphasize the connections within social networks and opportunities for publicity among various resources. Participation in innovation and entrepreneurship competitions also brings benefits such as funding, networking, and increased team visibility. On the market front, identifying early adopters and partners should begin with small enterprises that share similar values, while the ability to collaborate further with governments and large corporations largely hinges on the rising importance of sustainability issues. Additionally, the comparative analysis between Taiwan and Europe reveals that long-term government support is crucial for the sustained growth of Taiwanese social enterprises. However, these enterprises face challenges in terms of cultural influence and talent acquisition. In contrast, for European social enterprises, cultural factors are key to their development, while the inconsistency in regulations across EU member states poses difficulties for long-term growth.參考文獻 一、中文文獻 中小及新創企業署 (2023年10月30日)。經濟部中小及新創企業署協助社會創新組織永續成長。經濟部。取自：https://reurl.cc/RqQGvG。 王茜穎 (2022年1月4日)。 SDGs、ESG有什麼不同？兩者如何對照？一張表帶你看懂。 未來城市FutureCity＠天下。取自：https://futurecity.cw.com.tw/article/2328。 行政院 (2023年6月15日)。社會創新行動方案2.0。行政院全球資訊網。取自：https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/C6751C886659A16E?A=C。 吳佩蓁（2018）。創新生態系發展趨勢及芬蘭新創企業案例。臺灣經濟研究月刊，41(8)，24-32。 林宏駿 (2017)。創業熱：數位經濟時代的創業生態系統-理論回顧與未來研究建議。Journal of architecture, 18(1), 53-92。 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花（2005）。質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊，3(2)，122-136。 社企流 (2014)。社企力! : 社會企業＝翻轉世界的變革力量.用愛創業.做好事又能獲利!。臺北市: 果力文化,漫遊者事業股份有限公司。 陳昭宏 (2023年3月3日)。網購包裝減量7月將上路！規範包材減「重」等於減「量」嗎？。 CSR天下。取自：https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/43031。 曾令懷 (2023年3月22日)。循環經濟新創配客嘉獲5,200萬元Pre-A輪募資，以4,500個歸還站點為堡壘開啟新商。Meet創業小聚。取自： https://meet.bnext.com.tw/articles/view/50154。 黃秀玲（2018）。社會創新實驗：打造社會創新企業生態系統。國土及公共治理季刊，6(1)，78-87。 經濟部中小企業處（2020）。社會創新大調查(Taiwan Social Innovation Survey)。 經濟部中小企業處（2022）。111年度全球創業觀察調查計畫(Global Entrepreneurship Monitor) 執行摘要報告。 蔡莉、彭秀青、王玲 (2016)。创业生态系统研究回顾与展望。吉林大学社会科学学报, 56(1), 5-16。 蕭瑞麟 (2020)。《不用數字的研究：質性研究的資考脈絡》。台北：五南學術原創專書系列。 二、英文文獻 Abu-Saifan, S. (2012). Social Entrepreneurship: Definition and Boundaries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 22–27. Acs, Z. J., Armington, C., & Zhang, T. (2007). The determinants of new-frm survival across regional economies: The role of human capital stock and knowledge spillover. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 367–391. Acs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2018). Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: An ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 501–514. Akgüç, M. (2020). Understanding the determinants of social innovation in Europe: An econometric approach. In The Economics of Social Innovation (pp. 89-102). Routledge. Alcaide, L. V., Moliner, L. A., Murillo, D., & Buckland, H. (2019). Understanding the effects of social capital on social innovation ecosystems in Latin America through the lens of Social Network Approach. International Review of Sociology, 29(1), 1–35. Angelidou, M., & Psaltoglou, A. (2017). An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 33(December 2016), 113–125. Apostolopoulos, N., Al-Dajani, H., Holt, D., Jones, P., & Newbery, R. (2018). Entrepreneurship and the sustainable development goals. In Entrepreneurship and the sustainable development goals (pp. 1-7). Emerald Publishing Limited. Audretsch, D. B., Eichler, G. M., & Schwarz, E. J. (2022). Emerging needs of social innovators and social innovation ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-38. Babson college. (2022, February 9). GEM 2021/2022 Global Report: Opportunity Amid Disruption. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved May 15, 2024, from https://gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=50900. Bennett, E. E., & McWhorter, R. R. (2019). Social Movement Learning and Social Innovation: Empathy, Agency, and the Design of Solutions to Unmet Social Needs. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(2), 224–249. Brown, R., & Mason, C. J. S. B. E. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. 49(1), 11-30. Cantner, U., Cunningham, J. A., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model. Small Business Economics, 57, 407-423. Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14. Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ —Part 1: Topic Choice. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432–435. Change NOW. (2020, Mar 05). Circular economy: new business models | Shu Zhang, Jonne Hellgren. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdMODuwNSKU. Cross Change. (2022, Sep 22). How can we prevent packaging waste through a circular economy? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLYrPpGxNAo. Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 26-49. Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681-703. Domanski, D. (2018). Developing the Social Innovation Ecosystem of the Vienna Region. Wien. Duchek, S. (2018). Entrepreneurial resilience: A biographical analysis of successful entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 429–455. Eichler, G. M., & Schwarz, E. J. (2019). What sustainable development goals do social innovations address? A systematic review and content analysis of social innovation literature. Sustainability, 11(2), 522. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532-550. Etchart, N. and Comolli, L. (2013), Social Enterprise in Emerging Market Countries: No Free Ride, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY. European Commission. (2013). Guide to Social Innovation. Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/guides/2013/guide-to-social-innovation. Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial & corporate change, 10(4), 861-891. Friends of Bata. (2024). RePack: Reshaping the Future of Packaging in ECommerce.Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://www.friendsofbata.org/blog/repack-reshaping-the-future-of-packaging-in-ecommerce. Gasparin, M., Green, W., Lilley, S., Quinn, M., Saren, M., & Schinckus, C. (2020). Business as unusual: A business model for social innovation. Journal of Business Research. GT Impact. (2021, May 12). CIRCULAR ECONOMY: How to end E-Commerce packaging trash, with Jonne Hellgren (Repack) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-VU_6DZaYI. Harms R., Groen A. (2017). Loosen up? Cultural tightness and national entrepreneurial activity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 196–204. Horne, J., Recker, M., Michelfelder, I., Jay, J., & Kratzer, J. (2020). Exploring entrepreneurship related to the sustainable development goals-mapping new venture activities with semi-automated content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118052. Huybrechts, B., & Nicholls, A. (2012). Social Entrepreneurship: Definitions, Drivers and Challenges. In Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business (pp. 31–48). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. Isenberg, D. (2010). How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harward Business Review, 88(6). Isenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs. Isenberg, D. (2014). What an entrepreneurship ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review, 5(1), 7. Jankowski, N. W., & Jensen, K. B. (Eds.). (2002). A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research. Routledge. Liguori, E., & Bendickson, J. S. (2020). Rising to the challenge: Entrepreneurship ecosystems and SDG success. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 1(3–4), 118–125. Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business, 41(1), 36-44. Malecki, E. J. (2012). Regional social capital: Why it matters. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1023-1039. Mason C., & Brown R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high–growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to the OECD, 30(1), 77-102. Mason, C., & Harrison, R. (2006). After the exit: Acquisitions, entrepreneurial recycling and regional economic development. Regional Studies, 40(1), 55-73. Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995) In-depth Interviewing, Second Edition. South Melbourne: Longman. Ministry of economic affairs and employment of finland. (2022, May). Strategy for Social Enterprises. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71 (3), 75-83. Murzyn, D. (2021). Social entrepreneurship and selected elements of the entrepreneurship ecosystem. Przedsiębiorczość-Edukacja, 17(1), 165-176. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD. (1999). Social Enterprises (NO. 9789264182332). Paris: OECD. Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428-461. Pratono, A. H., & Sutanti, A. (2016). The ecosystem of social enterprise: Social culture, legal framework, and policy review in Indonesia. Pacifc Science Review b: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 106–112. Ratinho, T., Amezcua, A., Honig, B., & Zeng, Z. (2020). Supporting entrepreneurs: A systematic review of literature and an agenda for research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119956. Roundy, P. T. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Complementary or Disjointed Phenomena. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(9), 1252–1267. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. Spilling O.R. (1996). The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega–event. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 91–103. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759- 1769. Stam, E. (2018). Measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurial ecosystems (pp. 173–197). Springer. Stam, E., & van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 809–832. StartupBlink Global Startup Ecosystem Index (2023) Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://www.startupblink.com/. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307. Thomas, G. (2022). How to do your research project: A guide for students. Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96–116. Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2020). The lighthouse effect: How successful entrepreneurs influence the sustainability-orientation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of cleaner production, 264, 121616. Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2021). Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, 127054. Toivonen, T. (2016). What is the Social Innovation Community? Conceptualizing an Emergent Collaborative Organization. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 49–73. University of oulu. (2023, January 24). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2021–2022 Finnish Report. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved May 21, 2024, from https://gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=51137. Van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2022). Intermediaries for the greater good: How entrepreneurial support organizations can embed constrained sustainable development startups in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 51(2), 104438. Vogel, P. (2013, April). The employment outlook for youth: Building entrepreneurship ecosystems as a way forward. In Conference Proceedings of the G20 Youth Forum. Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2). Williams M. (1997) Social Surveys: Design to Analysis. In: T. May (Ed.) Social Research Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham: Open University Press. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Zero Waste Europe. (2019). The Story of RePack. Retrieved May 15, 2024, from https://zerowasteeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/zero_waste_europe_cs4_cp_repack_en.pdf. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
109364114資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109364114 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 鄭至甫 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Jeng, Jyh-Fu en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 許家瑄 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Hsu, Chia-Hsuan en_US dc.creator (作者) 許家瑄 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Chia-Hsuan en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-九月-2024 13:59:05 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-九月-2024 13:59:05 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-九月-2024 13:59:05 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0109364114 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153128 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 109364114 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來，全球面臨日益嚴峻的社會與環境問題，聯合國因而提出了17項永續發展目標，期望在2030年實現，這些目標已成為世界各國政府高度關注的議題。透過新創社會企業提出的社會創新方法有助於緩解或甚至解決眾多迫在眉睫的重大挑戰。而創業生態系統在新創企業的成長過程中扮演重要角色，然而過往文獻研究多著重在以利潤為導向的傳業活動，對於社會創新創業者的需求則不甚了解。因此本研究以Isenberg所提出的創業生態系統架構作為基礎，探討新創社會企業在成長歷程中如何與創業生態系統中的資源互動，進一步分析其在成長過程中可能產生出資源需求與缺口。 本研究以電子商務產業作為研究背景，並以台灣與歐洲代表性循環包裝新創社會企業作為比較個案，旨在深入探討不同的社會文化與環境背景下，新創社會企業的與創業生態系統資源互動關係有何異同，希望能為創業生態系統參與者提供實務建議，從而推動台灣創業生態系統朝向更有利於社會企業發展的方向前進。 本研究發現，相較於以利潤為導向的新創企業，社會企業更為注重各項資源中社會網絡的連結及宣傳機會，而參與創新創業競賽亦帶來資金補助、人脈建立、提升團隊知名度等正向效益。在市場面向上，尋找早期消費者與合作夥伴應從具相同理念的小型企業開始，而能進一步與政府及大型企業的合作，主要在於永續議題的興起。另外，從台歐比較中發現，對台灣新創社會企業而言，政府的長期支持是其持續成長的關鍵因素，然而，在文化及人才方面則較為弱勢。相反的，歐洲新創社會企業，文化因素是其能發展的重要關鍵，而歐盟各國制定的法規不一致性，則成為長期發展下會遇到的困難。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, the world has encountered increasingly severe social and environmental challenges. In response, the United Nations has introduced 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), intended to be achieved by 2030. These goals have garnered significant attention from governments globally. The social innovation approaches advanced by Social Enterprise start-ups have the potential to mitigate or even resolve many of these urgent and critical challenges. The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem plays a crucial role in the growth of startups. However, existing literature has predominantly focused on profit-driven entrepreneurial activities, with a limited understanding of the needs of social innovation entrepreneurs. Therefore, the study employs Isenberg's entrepreneurial ecosystem framework as a foundation to explore how social enterprise start-ups interact with the resources within the entrepreneurial ecosystem during their growth process. Furthermore, it analyzes the potential resource demands and gaps that may arise throughout their development. This study examines the e-commerce industry as the research context, focusing on a comparative case analysis of representative circular packaging social enterprise start-ups in Taiwan and Europe. The aim is to delve into the similarities and differences in how social enterprise start-ups interact with the resources of the entrepreneurial ecosystem under varying social, cultural, and environmental backgrounds. The study seeks to offer practical recommendations for participants in the entrepreneurial ecosystem, thereby fostering the development of Taiwan’s entrepreneurial ecosystem in a way that is more conducive to the growth of social enterprises. The study finds that, compared to profit-driven startups, social enterprises emphasize the connections within social networks and opportunities for publicity among various resources. Participation in innovation and entrepreneurship competitions also brings benefits such as funding, networking, and increased team visibility. On the market front, identifying early adopters and partners should begin with small enterprises that share similar values, while the ability to collaborate further with governments and large corporations largely hinges on the rising importance of sustainability issues. Additionally, the comparative analysis between Taiwan and Europe reveals that long-term government support is crucial for the sustained growth of Taiwanese social enterprises. However, these enterprises face challenges in terms of cultural influence and talent acquisition. In contrast, for European social enterprises, cultural factors are key to their development, while the inconsistency in regulations across EU member states poses difficulties for long-term growth. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 致謝 i 中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 表目錄 vi 圖目錄 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 4 第三節 研究目的與問題 6 第四節 研究流程 7 第二章 文獻回顧 8 第一節 聯合國永續發展目標之背景與概述 8 第二節 社會企業相關概念 11 第三節 創業生態系統 15 第四節 台灣與芬蘭創業生態系概況 22 第三章 研究方法 26 第一節 研究方法與分析架構 26 第二節 資料蒐集方式 28 第三節 案例選擇 29 第四章 個案研究分析 30 第一節 個案公司—配客嘉 30 第二節 個案公司—RePack 43 第三節 兩間個案公司比較分析 54 第五章 結論與建議 58 第一節 討論與發現 58 第二節 研究貢獻 64 第三節 研究限制與後續建議 68 第四節 結論 69 參考文獻 70 中文文獻 70 英文文獻 71 附錄 訪談大綱 78 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2962461 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109364114 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會企業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 創業生態系 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 永續發展 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 電子商務 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 循環包裝 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social enterprise en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Entrepreneurial ecosystem en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sustainable development en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) E-commerce en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Circular packaging en_US dc.title (題名) 新創社會企業與創業生態系之互動關係 —台歐比較研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Interaction Between Social Enterprise Start-up and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem—A Comparative Study Between Taiwan and Europe en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文文獻 中小及新創企業署 (2023年10月30日)。經濟部中小及新創企業署協助社會創新組織永續成長。經濟部。取自：https://reurl.cc/RqQGvG。 王茜穎 (2022年1月4日)。 SDGs、ESG有什麼不同？兩者如何對照？一張表帶你看懂。 未來城市FutureCity＠天下。取自：https://futurecity.cw.com.tw/article/2328。 行政院 (2023年6月15日)。社會創新行動方案2.0。行政院全球資訊網。取自：https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/C6751C886659A16E?A=C。 吳佩蓁（2018）。創新生態系發展趨勢及芬蘭新創企業案例。臺灣經濟研究月刊，41(8)，24-32。 林宏駿 (2017)。創業熱：數位經濟時代的創業生態系統-理論回顧與未來研究建議。Journal of architecture, 18(1), 53-92。 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花（2005）。質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊，3(2)，122-136。 社企流 (2014)。社企力! : 社會企業＝翻轉世界的變革力量.用愛創業.做好事又能獲利!。臺北市: 果力文化,漫遊者事業股份有限公司。 陳昭宏 (2023年3月3日)。網購包裝減量7月將上路！規範包材減「重」等於減「量」嗎？。 CSR天下。取自：https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/43031。 曾令懷 (2023年3月22日)。循環經濟新創配客嘉獲5,200萬元Pre-A輪募資，以4,500個歸還站點為堡壘開啟新商。Meet創業小聚。取自： https://meet.bnext.com.tw/articles/view/50154。 黃秀玲（2018）。社會創新實驗：打造社會創新企業生態系統。國土及公共治理季刊，6(1)，78-87。 經濟部中小企業處（2020）。社會創新大調查(Taiwan Social Innovation Survey)。 經濟部中小企業處（2022）。111年度全球創業觀察調查計畫(Global Entrepreneurship Monitor) 執行摘要報告。 蔡莉、彭秀青、王玲 (2016)。创业生态系统研究回顾与展望。吉林大学社会科学学报, 56(1), 5-16。 蕭瑞麟 (2020)。《不用數字的研究：質性研究的資考脈絡》。台北：五南學術原創專書系列。 二、英文文獻 Abu-Saifan, S. (2012). Social Entrepreneurship: Definition and Boundaries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 22–27. Acs, Z. J., Armington, C., & Zhang, T. (2007). The determinants of new-frm survival across regional economies: The role of human capital stock and knowledge spillover. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 367–391. Acs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2018). Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: An ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 501–514. Akgüç, M. (2020). Understanding the determinants of social innovation in Europe: An econometric approach. In The Economics of Social Innovation (pp. 89-102). Routledge. Alcaide, L. V., Moliner, L. A., Murillo, D., & Buckland, H. (2019). Understanding the effects of social capital on social innovation ecosystems in Latin America through the lens of Social Network Approach. International Review of Sociology, 29(1), 1–35. Angelidou, M., & Psaltoglou, A. (2017). An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 33(December 2016), 113–125. Apostolopoulos, N., Al-Dajani, H., Holt, D., Jones, P., & Newbery, R. (2018). Entrepreneurship and the sustainable development goals. In Entrepreneurship and the sustainable development goals (pp. 1-7). Emerald Publishing Limited. Audretsch, D. B., Eichler, G. M., & Schwarz, E. J. (2022). Emerging needs of social innovators and social innovation ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-38. Babson college. (2022, February 9). GEM 2021/2022 Global Report: Opportunity Amid Disruption. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved May 15, 2024, from https://gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=50900. Bennett, E. E., & McWhorter, R. R. (2019). Social Movement Learning and Social Innovation: Empathy, Agency, and the Design of Solutions to Unmet Social Needs. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(2), 224–249. Brown, R., & Mason, C. J. S. B. E. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. 49(1), 11-30. Cantner, U., Cunningham, J. A., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model. Small Business Economics, 57, 407-423. Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14. Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ —Part 1: Topic Choice. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432–435. Change NOW. (2020, Mar 05). Circular economy: new business models | Shu Zhang, Jonne Hellgren. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdMODuwNSKU. Cross Change. (2022, Sep 22). How can we prevent packaging waste through a circular economy? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLYrPpGxNAo. Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 26-49. Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681-703. Domanski, D. (2018). Developing the Social Innovation Ecosystem of the Vienna Region. Wien. Duchek, S. (2018). Entrepreneurial resilience: A biographical analysis of successful entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 429–455. Eichler, G. M., & Schwarz, E. J. (2019). What sustainable development goals do social innovations address? A systematic review and content analysis of social innovation literature. Sustainability, 11(2), 522. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532-550. Etchart, N. and Comolli, L. (2013), Social Enterprise in Emerging Market Countries: No Free Ride, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY. European Commission. (2013). Guide to Social Innovation. Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/guides/2013/guide-to-social-innovation. Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial & corporate change, 10(4), 861-891. Friends of Bata. (2024). RePack: Reshaping the Future of Packaging in ECommerce.Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://www.friendsofbata.org/blog/repack-reshaping-the-future-of-packaging-in-ecommerce. Gasparin, M., Green, W., Lilley, S., Quinn, M., Saren, M., & Schinckus, C. (2020). Business as unusual: A business model for social innovation. Journal of Business Research. GT Impact. (2021, May 12). CIRCULAR ECONOMY: How to end E-Commerce packaging trash, with Jonne Hellgren (Repack) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-VU_6DZaYI. Harms R., Groen A. (2017). Loosen up? Cultural tightness and national entrepreneurial activity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 196–204. Horne, J., Recker, M., Michelfelder, I., Jay, J., & Kratzer, J. (2020). Exploring entrepreneurship related to the sustainable development goals-mapping new venture activities with semi-automated content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118052. Huybrechts, B., & Nicholls, A. (2012). Social Entrepreneurship: Definitions, Drivers and Challenges. In Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business (pp. 31–48). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. Isenberg, D. (2010). How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harward Business Review, 88(6). Isenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs. Isenberg, D. (2014). What an entrepreneurship ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review, 5(1), 7. Jankowski, N. W., & Jensen, K. B. (Eds.). (2002). A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research. Routledge. Liguori, E., & Bendickson, J. S. (2020). Rising to the challenge: Entrepreneurship ecosystems and SDG success. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 1(3–4), 118–125. Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business, 41(1), 36-44. Malecki, E. J. (2012). Regional social capital: Why it matters. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1023-1039. Mason C., & Brown R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high–growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to the OECD, 30(1), 77-102. Mason, C., & Harrison, R. (2006). After the exit: Acquisitions, entrepreneurial recycling and regional economic development. Regional Studies, 40(1), 55-73. Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995) In-depth Interviewing, Second Edition. South Melbourne: Longman. Ministry of economic affairs and employment of finland. (2022, May). Strategy for Social Enterprises. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71 (3), 75-83. Murzyn, D. (2021). Social entrepreneurship and selected elements of the entrepreneurship ecosystem. Przedsiębiorczość-Edukacja, 17(1), 165-176. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD. (1999). Social Enterprises (NO. 9789264182332). Paris: OECD. Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428-461. Pratono, A. H., & Sutanti, A. (2016). The ecosystem of social enterprise: Social culture, legal framework, and policy review in Indonesia. Pacifc Science Review b: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 106–112. Ratinho, T., Amezcua, A., Honig, B., & Zeng, Z. (2020). Supporting entrepreneurs: A systematic review of literature and an agenda for research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119956. Roundy, P. T. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Complementary or Disjointed Phenomena. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(9), 1252–1267. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. Spilling O.R. (1996). The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega–event. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 91–103. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759- 1769. Stam, E. (2018). Measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurial ecosystems (pp. 173–197). Springer. Stam, E., & van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 809–832. StartupBlink Global Startup Ecosystem Index (2023) Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://www.startupblink.com/. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307. Thomas, G. (2022). How to do your research project: A guide for students. Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96–116. Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2020). The lighthouse effect: How successful entrepreneurs influence the sustainability-orientation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of cleaner production, 264, 121616. Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2021). Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, 127054. Toivonen, T. (2016). What is the Social Innovation Community? Conceptualizing an Emergent Collaborative Organization. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 49–73. University of oulu. (2023, January 24). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2021–2022 Finnish Report. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Retrieved May 21, 2024, from https://gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=51137. Van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2022). Intermediaries for the greater good: How entrepreneurial support organizations can embed constrained sustainable development startups in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 51(2), 104438. Vogel, P. (2013, April). The employment outlook for youth: Building entrepreneurship ecosystems as a way forward. In Conference Proceedings of the G20 Youth Forum. Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2). Williams M. (1997) Social Surveys: Design to Analysis. In: T. May (Ed.) Social Research Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham: Open University Press. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Zero Waste Europe. (2019). The Story of RePack. Retrieved May 15, 2024, from https://zerowasteeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/zero_waste_europe_cs4_cp_repack_en.pdf. zh_TW
