1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 民進黨全面執政下的立法策略與立法表現
The Legislative Strategies and Legislative Performance under the DPP Rule
作者 梁珈瑄
Liang, Chia-Hsuan
貢獻者 盛杏湲
Sheng, Shing-Yuan
梁珈瑄
Liang, Chia-Hsuan
關鍵詞 分權立法制度
立法提案
立法成功
民進黨
全面執政
日期 2024
上傳時間 4-Sep-2024 15:58:42 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文以民進黨首次全面執政之下的第九屆立法院（2016-2020）為研究範圍，透過量化研究方法，分析這段期間內全部的立法提案，瞭解各立法者提案的平均通過天數，以及在不同立法成功標準下，各政黨黨團、立法委員、行政院間立法成功的差異。此外，本文亦運用深入訪談法，探討民進黨內部強化政黨團結與內部溝通的制度、在立法上採取的具體策略，以及國民黨及其他小黨在民進黨全面執政下的應對策略，並檢視分權立法制度是否能確實保障他們的立法參與。 量化研究結果發現，行政院提案的三讀通過的速度相比於其他立法者更佳，也比第八屆國民黨全面執政下的行政院更快速，而立法成功的部分，行政院、民進黨黨團表現方面優於其他黨團，但民進黨立委與在野黨立委之間的差異並不大。 深入訪談結果發現，民進黨內部存在許多強化政黨團結的制度，以確保政黨團結以及對外表現的一致，雙召委和黨團協商制度確實在程序上，能為在野黨提供更多參與立法過程的機會，但就提案內容上，民進黨對於爭議性較大的議題時，仍會透過相應立法策略去確保最終三讀通過的版本是按其提案版本通過，此外，民進黨的全面執政之下，行政主導立法的現象比過去更加明顯，但各立法者也順應此現象發展出相應的策略，針對行政院的提案提出對案，透過併案審查的方式使自己的提案通過三讀，藉此收獲立委個人的立法功勞。
參考文獻 一、中文文獻 丁鼎，2021，〈我國立法院黨團協商的制度變遷與制度化〉，《政治科學論叢》，88：1-50。 三立新聞網，2021，〈亡黨感爆發？國民黨青年：輸在不團結〉，三立新聞網：https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=1001429，檢索日期：2023年9月22日。 王石番，1991，《傳播內容分析法－理論與實證》，臺北：幼獅文化。 中央選舉委員會，2023，中央選舉委員會：https://web.cec.gov.tw，檢索日期：2023年11月1日。 王業立，2002，〈國會中的政黨角色與黨團運作〉，《月旦法學》，86：82-97。 王業立，2014，〈立法院黨團協商制度之探討〉，公共政策與法律研究中心13年度研究計畫按期末報告。台北：國立台灣大學。 立法院議事暨公報資訊網，2018，〈立法院公報第107卷第19期第五冊院會紀錄〉，立法院議事暨公報資訊網：https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/，檢索日期：2024年8月4日。 立法院全球資訊網，2023，立法院全球資訊網：https://www.ly.gov.tw，檢索日期：2023年11月1日。 自由時報，2015，〈解決馬執政亂象 蔡英文：我推動「五大改革」〉，自由時報：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1414303，檢索日期：2023年8月16日。 何佩珊，2015，《大局，承擔 柯建銘的國會折衝與關鍵承擔》，臺北：幸福綠光股份有限公司。 邱訪義，2012，〈影響行政部門提案三讀通過之制度性因素—總統、官僚、與政黨〉，《台灣民主季刊》，13（1）：39-84。 邱訪義、李誌偉，2012，〈立法院積極議程設定之理論與經驗分析：第二至第六屆〉，《台灣政治學刊》，16（1）：1-58。 邱訪義、李誌偉，2013，〈立法院消極議程控制的邏輯與經驗分析〉，《東吳政治學報》，31（4）：1-70。 邱訪義、鄭元毓，2014，〈立法院黨團協商：少數霸凌多數亦或是多數主場優勢〉，《政治科學論叢》，62：155-194。 郭正亮，1998，《民進黨轉型之痛》，台北：天下遠見出版公司。 盛杏湲，1997，〈立法委員的立法參與:概念、本質與測量〉，《問題與研究》，36（3）：1-25。 盛杏湲，1999，《政黨動員與立法政治》，臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。 盛杏湲，2000a，〈立法委員為什麼游走在不同的委員會？〉，《政治制度》，台北：中央研究院，361-399。 盛杏湲，2000b，〈政黨或選區?立法委員的代表取向與行為〉，《選舉研究》，7（2）：37-70。 盛杏湲，2003，〈立法機關與行政機關在立法過程中的影響力：一致政府與分立政府的比較〉，《台灣政治學刊》，7（2）：51-105。 盛杏湲，2005，〈選區代表與集體代表：立法委員的代表角色〉，《東吳政治學報》，21：1-40。 盛杏湲，2008，〈政黨的國會領導與凝聚—2000年政黨輪替前後的觀察〉，《台灣民主季刊》，5（4）：1-46。 盛杏湲，2014a，〈選制變革前後立委提案的持續與變遷：一個探索性的研究〉，《台灣政治學刊》，18（1）：73-127。 盛杏湲，2014b，〈再探選區服務與立法問政：選制改革前後的比較〉，《東吳政治學報》，32（2）：65-116。 盛杏湲，2014c，〈從立法提案到立法產出—比較行政院與立法院在立法過程的影響力〉，《轉型中的行政與立法關係》，黃秀端主編，台北：五南，23-60。 盛杏湲，2015，〈立法成功的邏輯〉，第七屆國會學術研討會，台北：東吳大學。 盛杏湲，2019，〈立法委員立法成功表現的影響因素〉，《國會立法與國會監督》，黃秀端主編，台北：五南，1-30。 盛杏湲，2021，《立法院常設委員會的立法影響力》，計畫編號：MOST109-2410-H-004-051-MY2，台北：行政院國家科學及技術委員會。 盛杏湲，2022，《民進黨全面執政下的立法政治》，計畫編號：MOST111-2410-H-004-055-MY3，台北：行政院國家科學及技術委員會。 盛杏湲、黃士豪，2017，〈黨團協商機制:從制度化觀點分析〉，《東吳政治學報》，35：37-92。 黃秀端，2003a，〈委員會制度:國會運作的樞紐〉，《解構國會－改造國會》，台北：允晨文化，52-66。 黃秀端，2003b，〈少數政府在國會的困境〉，《台灣政治學刊》，7（2）：3-49。 黃秀端、何嵩婷，2007，〈黨團協商與國會立法：第五屆立法院的分析〉，《政治科學論叢》，34：1-44。 楊婉瑩，2002，〈立法院委員會的決策角色：以第三屆立法院為例〉，《問題與研究》，41（4）：83-113。 楊婉瑩，2003，〈一致性到分立政府的政黨合作與衝突－以第四屆立法院為例〉，《東吳政治學報》，16：49-95。 楊婉瑩、陳采葳，2004，〈國會改革風潮下黨團協商制度之轉變與評估〉，《東吳政治學報》，19：111-150。 楊婉瑩、藍文君，2008，〈關鍵性別比例與權力行使的關係－對立法院委員會召集委員的觀察〉，《政治學報》，46：1-43。 廖達琪，2005，〈「橡皮圖章」如何轉變為「河東獅吼」？－立法院在台灣民主化過程中角色轉變之探究（1950-2000）〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，17（2）：343-391。 蔡韻竹，2009，〈國會小黨的行動策略與運作〉。國立政治大學政治學系博士論文。 鄭明德，2004，《一脈總相承：派系政治在民進黨》，台北：時英出版社。 蕭怡靖，2005，〈我國立法院資深制度之探討－委員會遊走及召集委員資深度之變遷〉，《政治科學論叢》，25：105-134。 二、英文文獻 Aldrich, John H. and David W. Rohde. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection.” In Congress Reconsidered: 269-292, ed. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. Amorim Neto, Octavio, Gary W. Cox., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil’s Câmara dos Deputados, 1989 to 1999.” World Politics 55: 550-578. Alemán, E. and Navia, P. 2016. “Presidential Power, Legislative Rules and Law Making in Chile.” In Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America:92-121, ed. Alemán E. and Tsebelis G. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Anderson, William D., Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier and Valeria Sinclair Chapman. 2003. “The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(3): 357-386. Binder, Sarah A. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96.” American Political Science Review 93: 519-533. Carey, John and Mathew S. Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14: 419-439. Coleman, J. J. 1999. “Unified government, divided government, and party responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 93: 821-835. Cox, Gray W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cox, Gray W. 2006. “The Organization of Democratic Legislatures. ” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Econom:141-161, ed. Weingast B and Wittman D. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cox, Gary W., Mikitaka Masuyama, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2000. “Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 1: 1-22. Cox, Gray W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting The Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Deering, Christopher J. and Smith, Steven S. 1997. Committees in Congress. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press College. Döring, Herbert. 1995. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europ. Frankfurt and New York: Campus and St. Martin’s Press. Edward B. Hasecke and Jason D. Mycoff. 2007. “Party Loyalty and Legislative Success ; Are Loyal Majority Party Members More Successful in the U.S. House of Representatives?” Political Research Quarterly 60(4): 607-617. Ellickson, Mark C. 1992. “Pathways to Legislative Success: A Path Analytic Study of the Missouri House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(2): 285-302. Fenno, Richard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown. Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company. Field, Bonnie N. 2016. Why Minority Governments Work: Multilevel Territorial Politics in Spain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Figueiredo Argelina Cheibub and Limongi Fernando. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32(2):151-170. Fiorina, Morris P. 1980. “The Decline of Collective Responsibility in American Politics.” Daedalus 109(1): 25-45. Fiorina, Morris P. 1987. “Alternative Rationales for Restricitive Porcedures.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 3: 337-345. Gilligan, Thomas W., and Keith Krehbiel. 1987. “Collective Decision-Making and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationales for Restrictive Amendment Procedures.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3 (2): 287-335. Hartzell, C. and Hoddie, M. 2003. “Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 318-332. Hasecke, Edward B. and Mycoff, Jason D. 2007. “Party Loyalty and Legislative Success: Are Loyal Majority Party Members More Successful in the U.S. House of Representatives?” Political Research Quarterly 60(4): 607-617. Hedlund, Ronald. 1984. “Organizational Attributes of Legislative Institutions: Structure, Rules, Norms, Resources.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9(1): 51-121. Heywood, Andrew. 2002. Politics. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Foundation. Hibbing, John and Theiss-Morse E. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hibbing, John. 2002.“How to Make Congress Popular.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(2): 219-244. Huang, Isaac Shih-hao, and Shing-yuan Sheng. 2022. “Rethinking the Decentralization of Legislative Organization and its Implications for Policymaking: Evidence from Taiwan.” Government and Opposition 57(2): 318-335. Jewell, Malcolm E. and Patterson, Samuel C. 1977. The Legislative Process in the United States (3rd ed.). New York: Random House, Inc. Katz, R.S. 1986. “Party government: a rationalistic conception.” Visions and Realities of Party Government. De Gruyter, Berlin, 31-71. Kingdon, John W. 1989 Congressman’s Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1975. “Consociational democracy in the international system.” European Journal of Political Research 3(4), 377-391. Lijphart, Arend. 1969. “Consociational Democracy.” World Politics 21(2), 207-225. Mark S. Hurwitz, Roger J. Moiles and David W. Rohde. 2001. “Distributive and Partisan Issues in Agriculture Policy in the 104th House.” The American Political Science Review 95(4), 911-922. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Law making, and Investigations 1946-2002. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Maltzman, Forrest and Charles R. Shipan. 2008. “Change, Continuity, and the Evolution of the Law.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 252-267. Martorano, Nancy. 2004. “Cohesion or Reciprocity? Majority Party Strength and Minority Party Procedural Rights in the Legislative Process.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4(1): 55-73. Marshall, Brian. 2002. “Explaining the Roles of Restrictive Rules in the Post reform House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (1):61-86. McCulloch, Allison. 2014. Power-Sharing and Political Stability in Deeply Divided Societies. London: Routledge. McCulloch, Allison. 2018. The Use and Abuse of Veto Rights in Power-Sharing Systems: Northern Ireland’s Petition of Concern in Comparative Perspective. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 53(4), 735-756. Moore, Michael K. and Sue Thomas. 1991. “Explaining Legislative Success in the U. S. Senate: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties.” The Western Political Quarterly 44(4): 959-970. Mishler W and Rose R. 1994. “Support for Parliaments and Regimes in the Transition toward Democracy in Eastern Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19(1): 5-32. Mitchell, P. 2000. “Voters and their representatives: electoral institutions and delegation in parliamentary democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 335-351. Müller, W.C. 2000. “Political parties in parliamentary democracies: making delegation and accountability work.” European Journal of Political Research 34 (3): 309-333. Nalepa, Monika. 2016. “Party Institutionalization and Legislative Organization: The Evolution of Agenda Power in the Polish Parliament.” Journal of Comparative Politics 48(3): 353-372. O’Leary, B. 2005. “Debating Consociational Politics: Normative and Explanatory Arguments” In From Power-Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies: 3-43, ed. Noel S.. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Olson, David. 1994. Democratic Legislative Institutions: A Comparative View. Armonk, New York: ME Sharpe. Ragusa, J. M. 2010. “The Lifecycle of Public Policy: An Event History Analysis of Repeals to Landmark Legislative Enactments, 1951-2006.” American Politics Research 38(6): 1015-1051. Roberts, Jason M. 2010. “The Development of Special Orders and Special Rules in the U.S. House, 1881-1937.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 35 (3): 307-336. Rohde, David W. 1995b. “Parties and Committees in the House: Member Motivations, Issues, and Institutional Arrangements.” In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions: 119-137, ed. Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Sheng, Shing-Yuan. 1996. Electoral Competition and Legislative Participation: The Case of Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. “The Institutional Fundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81(1): 85-107. Siavelis, Peter M. 2002. “Exaggerated presidentialism and moderate presidents: executive-legislative relations in Chile.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern S. and Nacif B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sieberer, Ulrich. 2010. “Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems: Deviating voting behavior of district and list MPs in the German Bundestag.” Electoral Studies 29: 484-496. Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The U. S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Sinclair, Barbara. 1999. “Transformational Leader or Faithful Agent? Principal- Agent Theory and House Majority Party Leadership.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24(3): 421-449. Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Smith, Steven S. and Deering, Christopher J. 1990. Committees in Congress. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Sundquist, James L. 1988. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103(4): 613-635. Taylor, Andrew J. 1998. “Explaining Government Productivity.” American Political Quarterly 26(4): 439-458. Tsebelis, G. 1995. “Decision making in Political Systems: Veto players in Presidentialism, Parliamentalism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 289-325. Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Whitaker, Richard. 2005. “National Parties in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics 6 (1): 5-28. Weingast, Barry R., and William J. Marshall. 1988 “The Industrial Organization of Congress.” Journal of Political Economy 96(1): 132-163. Zittel, Thomas and Dominic Nyhuis. 2019. “Two Faces of Party Unity: Roll-Call Behavior and Vote Explanations in the German Bundestag.” Parliamentary Affairs 72(2): 406-424.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
109252001
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109252001
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 盛杏湲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Sheng, Shing-Yuanen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 梁珈瑄zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Liang, Chia-Hsuanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 梁珈瑄zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Liang, Chia-Hsuanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2024en_US
dc.date.accessioned 4-Sep-2024 15:58:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 4-Sep-2024 15:58:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Sep-2024 15:58:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109252001en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153531-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 政治學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 109252001zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文以民進黨首次全面執政之下的第九屆立法院（2016-2020）為研究範圍，透過量化研究方法，分析這段期間內全部的立法提案，瞭解各立法者提案的平均通過天數，以及在不同立法成功標準下，各政黨黨團、立法委員、行政院間立法成功的差異。此外，本文亦運用深入訪談法，探討民進黨內部強化政黨團結與內部溝通的制度、在立法上採取的具體策略，以及國民黨及其他小黨在民進黨全面執政下的應對策略，並檢視分權立法制度是否能確實保障他們的立法參與。 量化研究結果發現，行政院提案的三讀通過的速度相比於其他立法者更佳，也比第八屆國民黨全面執政下的行政院更快速，而立法成功的部分，行政院、民進黨黨團表現方面優於其他黨團，但民進黨立委與在野黨立委之間的差異並不大。 深入訪談結果發現，民進黨內部存在許多強化政黨團結的制度，以確保政黨團結以及對外表現的一致，雙召委和黨團協商制度確實在程序上，能為在野黨提供更多參與立法過程的機會，但就提案內容上，民進黨對於爭議性較大的議題時，仍會透過相應立法策略去確保最終三讀通過的版本是按其提案版本通過，此外，民進黨的全面執政之下，行政主導立法的現象比過去更加明顯，但各立法者也順應此現象發展出相應的策略，針對行政院的提案提出對案，透過併案審查的方式使自己的提案通過三讀，藉此收獲立委個人的立法功勞。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與問題意識 1 第二節 章節安排 3 第二章 文獻檢閱 5 第一節 政黨理論在立法研究中的重要性 5 第二節 集權和分權的立法組織 11 第三節 我國立法院的立法組織型態 18 第三章 理論建構與研究假設 24 第四章 研究設計與研究方法 31 第一節 研究範圍與變數建構 31 第二節 研究方法 35 第五章 實證研究分析 38 第一節 第九屆立法提案概況 38 第二節 模型檢證 44 第六章 深入訪談研究 53 第一節 全面執政下民進黨的立法策略與表現 53 第二節 在野黨的生存策略 69 第七章 結論 79 參考文獻 82 附錄 93 附錄一 深入訪談大綱 93 附錄二 深入訪談名單 95zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1743450 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109252001en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 分權立法制度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立法提案zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立法成功zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民進黨zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 全面執政zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 民進黨全面執政下的立法策略與立法表現zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Legislative Strategies and Legislative Performance under the DPP Ruleen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文文獻 丁鼎，2021，〈我國立法院黨團協商的制度變遷與制度化〉，《政治科學論叢》，88：1-50。 三立新聞網，2021，〈亡黨感爆發？國民黨青年：輸在不團結〉，三立新聞網：https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=1001429，檢索日期：2023年9月22日。 王石番，1991，《傳播內容分析法－理論與實證》，臺北：幼獅文化。 中央選舉委員會，2023，中央選舉委員會：https://web.cec.gov.tw，檢索日期：2023年11月1日。 王業立，2002，〈國會中的政黨角色與黨團運作〉，《月旦法學》，86：82-97。 王業立，2014，〈立法院黨團協商制度之探討〉，公共政策與法律研究中心13年度研究計畫按期末報告。台北：國立台灣大學。 立法院議事暨公報資訊網，2018，〈立法院公報第107卷第19期第五冊院會紀錄〉，立法院議事暨公報資訊網：https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/，檢索日期：2024年8月4日。 立法院全球資訊網，2023，立法院全球資訊網：https://www.ly.gov.tw，檢索日期：2023年11月1日。 自由時報，2015，〈解決馬執政亂象 蔡英文：我推動「五大改革」〉，自由時報：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1414303，檢索日期：2023年8月16日。 何佩珊，2015，《大局，承擔 柯建銘的國會折衝與關鍵承擔》，臺北：幸福綠光股份有限公司。 邱訪義，2012，〈影響行政部門提案三讀通過之制度性因素—總統、官僚、與政黨〉，《台灣民主季刊》，13（1）：39-84。 邱訪義、李誌偉，2012，〈立法院積極議程設定之理論與經驗分析：第二至第六屆〉，《台灣政治學刊》，16（1）：1-58。 邱訪義、李誌偉，2013，〈立法院消極議程控制的邏輯與經驗分析〉，《東吳政治學報》，31（4）：1-70。 邱訪義、鄭元毓，2014，〈立法院黨團協商：少數霸凌多數亦或是多數主場優勢〉，《政治科學論叢》，62：155-194。 郭正亮，1998，《民進黨轉型之痛》，台北：天下遠見出版公司。 盛杏湲，1997，〈立法委員的立法參與:概念、本質與測量〉，《問題與研究》，36（3）：1-25。 盛杏湲，1999，《政黨動員與立法政治》，臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。 盛杏湲，2000a，〈立法委員為什麼游走在不同的委員會？〉，《政治制度》，台北：中央研究院，361-399。 盛杏湲，2000b，〈政黨或選區?立法委員的代表取向與行為〉，《選舉研究》，7（2）：37-70。 盛杏湲，2003，〈立法機關與行政機關在立法過程中的影響力：一致政府與分立政府的比較〉，《台灣政治學刊》，7（2）：51-105。 盛杏湲，2005，〈選區代表與集體代表：立法委員的代表角色〉，《東吳政治學報》，21：1-40。 盛杏湲，2008，〈政黨的國會領導與凝聚—2000年政黨輪替前後的觀察〉，《台灣民主季刊》，5（4）：1-46。 盛杏湲，2014a，〈選制變革前後立委提案的持續與變遷：一個探索性的研究〉，《台灣政治學刊》，18（1）：73-127。 盛杏湲，2014b，〈再探選區服務與立法問政：選制改革前後的比較〉，《東吳政治學報》，32（2）：65-116。 盛杏湲，2014c，〈從立法提案到立法產出—比較行政院與立法院在立法過程的影響力〉，《轉型中的行政與立法關係》，黃秀端主編，台北：五南，23-60。 盛杏湲，2015，〈立法成功的邏輯〉，第七屆國會學術研討會，台北：東吳大學。 盛杏湲，2019，〈立法委員立法成功表現的影響因素〉，《國會立法與國會監督》，黃秀端主編，台北：五南，1-30。 盛杏湲，2021，《立法院常設委員會的立法影響力》，計畫編號：MOST109-2410-H-004-051-MY2，台北：行政院國家科學及技術委員會。 盛杏湲，2022，《民進黨全面執政下的立法政治》，計畫編號：MOST111-2410-H-004-055-MY3，台北：行政院國家科學及技術委員會。 盛杏湲、黃士豪，2017，〈黨團協商機制:從制度化觀點分析〉，《東吳政治學報》，35：37-92。 黃秀端，2003a，〈委員會制度:國會運作的樞紐〉，《解構國會－改造國會》，台北：允晨文化，52-66。 黃秀端，2003b，〈少數政府在國會的困境〉，《台灣政治學刊》，7（2）：3-49。 黃秀端、何嵩婷，2007，〈黨團協商與國會立法：第五屆立法院的分析〉，《政治科學論叢》，34：1-44。 楊婉瑩，2002，〈立法院委員會的決策角色：以第三屆立法院為例〉，《問題與研究》，41（4）：83-113。 楊婉瑩，2003，〈一致性到分立政府的政黨合作與衝突－以第四屆立法院為例〉，《東吳政治學報》，16：49-95。 楊婉瑩、陳采葳，2004，〈國會改革風潮下黨團協商制度之轉變與評估〉，《東吳政治學報》，19：111-150。 楊婉瑩、藍文君，2008，〈關鍵性別比例與權力行使的關係－對立法院委員會召集委員的觀察〉，《政治學報》，46：1-43。 廖達琪，2005，〈「橡皮圖章」如何轉變為「河東獅吼」？－立法院在台灣民主化過程中角色轉變之探究（1950-2000）〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，17（2）：343-391。 蔡韻竹，2009，〈國會小黨的行動策略與運作〉。國立政治大學政治學系博士論文。 鄭明德，2004，《一脈總相承：派系政治在民進黨》，台北：時英出版社。 蕭怡靖，2005，〈我國立法院資深制度之探討－委員會遊走及召集委員資深度之變遷〉，《政治科學論叢》，25：105-134。 二、英文文獻 Aldrich, John H. and David W. Rohde. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection.” In Congress Reconsidered: 269-292, ed. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. Amorim Neto, Octavio, Gary W. Cox., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil’s Câmara dos Deputados, 1989 to 1999.” World Politics 55: 550-578. Alemán, E. and Navia, P. 2016. “Presidential Power, Legislative Rules and Law Making in Chile.” In Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America:92-121, ed. Alemán E. and Tsebelis G. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Anderson, William D., Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier and Valeria Sinclair Chapman. 2003. “The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(3): 357-386. Binder, Sarah A. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96.” American Political Science Review 93: 519-533. Carey, John and Mathew S. Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14: 419-439. Coleman, J. J. 1999. “Unified government, divided government, and party responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 93: 821-835. Cox, Gray W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cox, Gray W. 2006. “The Organization of Democratic Legislatures. ” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Econom:141-161, ed. Weingast B and Wittman D. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cox, Gary W., Mikitaka Masuyama, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2000. “Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 1: 1-22. Cox, Gray W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting The Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Deering, Christopher J. and Smith, Steven S. 1997. Committees in Congress. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press College. Döring, Herbert. 1995. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europ. Frankfurt and New York: Campus and St. Martin’s Press. Edward B. Hasecke and Jason D. Mycoff. 2007. “Party Loyalty and Legislative Success ; Are Loyal Majority Party Members More Successful in the U.S. House of Representatives?” Political Research Quarterly 60(4): 607-617. Ellickson, Mark C. 1992. “Pathways to Legislative Success: A Path Analytic Study of the Missouri House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(2): 285-302. Fenno, Richard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown. Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company. Field, Bonnie N. 2016. Why Minority Governments Work: Multilevel Territorial Politics in Spain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Figueiredo Argelina Cheibub and Limongi Fernando. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32(2):151-170. Fiorina, Morris P. 1980. “The Decline of Collective Responsibility in American Politics.” Daedalus 109(1): 25-45. Fiorina, Morris P. 1987. “Alternative Rationales for Restricitive Porcedures.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 3: 337-345. Gilligan, Thomas W., and Keith Krehbiel. 1987. “Collective Decision-Making and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationales for Restrictive Amendment Procedures.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3 (2): 287-335. Hartzell, C. and Hoddie, M. 2003. “Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 318-332. Hasecke, Edward B. and Mycoff, Jason D. 2007. “Party Loyalty and Legislative Success: Are Loyal Majority Party Members More Successful in the U.S. House of Representatives?” Political Research Quarterly 60(4): 607-617. Hedlund, Ronald. 1984. “Organizational Attributes of Legislative Institutions: Structure, Rules, Norms, Resources.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9(1): 51-121. Heywood, Andrew. 2002. Politics. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Foundation. Hibbing, John and Theiss-Morse E. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hibbing, John. 2002.“How to Make Congress Popular.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(2): 219-244. Huang, Isaac Shih-hao, and Shing-yuan Sheng. 2022. “Rethinking the Decentralization of Legislative Organization and its Implications for Policymaking: Evidence from Taiwan.” Government and Opposition 57(2): 318-335. Jewell, Malcolm E. and Patterson, Samuel C. 1977. The Legislative Process in the United States (3rd ed.). New York: Random House, Inc. Katz, R.S. 1986. “Party government: a rationalistic conception.” Visions and Realities of Party Government. De Gruyter, Berlin, 31-71. Kingdon, John W. 1989 Congressman’s Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1975. “Consociational democracy in the international system.” European Journal of Political Research 3(4), 377-391. Lijphart, Arend. 1969. “Consociational Democracy.” World Politics 21(2), 207-225. Mark S. Hurwitz, Roger J. Moiles and David W. Rohde. 2001. “Distributive and Partisan Issues in Agriculture Policy in the 104th House.” The American Political Science Review 95(4), 911-922. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Law making, and Investigations 1946-2002. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Maltzman, Forrest and Charles R. Shipan. 2008. “Change, Continuity, and the Evolution of the Law.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 252-267. Martorano, Nancy. 2004. “Cohesion or Reciprocity? Majority Party Strength and Minority Party Procedural Rights in the Legislative Process.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4(1): 55-73. Marshall, Brian. 2002. “Explaining the Roles of Restrictive Rules in the Post reform House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (1):61-86. McCulloch, Allison. 2014. Power-Sharing and Political Stability in Deeply Divided Societies. London: Routledge. McCulloch, Allison. 2018. The Use and Abuse of Veto Rights in Power-Sharing Systems: Northern Ireland’s Petition of Concern in Comparative Perspective. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 53(4), 735-756. Moore, Michael K. and Sue Thomas. 1991. “Explaining Legislative Success in the U. S. Senate: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties.” The Western Political Quarterly 44(4): 959-970. Mishler W and Rose R. 1994. “Support for Parliaments and Regimes in the Transition toward Democracy in Eastern Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19(1): 5-32. Mitchell, P. 2000. “Voters and their representatives: electoral institutions and delegation in parliamentary democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 335-351. Müller, W.C. 2000. “Political parties in parliamentary democracies: making delegation and accountability work.” European Journal of Political Research 34 (3): 309-333. Nalepa, Monika. 2016. “Party Institutionalization and Legislative Organization: The Evolution of Agenda Power in the Polish Parliament.” Journal of Comparative Politics 48(3): 353-372. O’Leary, B. 2005. “Debating Consociational Politics: Normative and Explanatory Arguments” In From Power-Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies: 3-43, ed. Noel S.. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Olson, David. 1994. Democratic Legislative Institutions: A Comparative View. Armonk, New York: ME Sharpe. Ragusa, J. M. 2010. “The Lifecycle of Public Policy: An Event History Analysis of Repeals to Landmark Legislative Enactments, 1951-2006.” American Politics Research 38(6): 1015-1051. Roberts, Jason M. 2010. “The Development of Special Orders and Special Rules in the U.S. House, 1881-1937.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 35 (3): 307-336. Rohde, David W. 1995b. “Parties and Committees in the House: Member Motivations, Issues, and Institutional Arrangements.” In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions: 119-137, ed. Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Sheng, Shing-Yuan. 1996. Electoral Competition and Legislative Participation: The Case of Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. “The Institutional Fundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81(1): 85-107. Siavelis, Peter M. 2002. “Exaggerated presidentialism and moderate presidents: executive-legislative relations in Chile.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern S. and Nacif B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sieberer, Ulrich. 2010. “Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems: Deviating voting behavior of district and list MPs in the German Bundestag.” Electoral Studies 29: 484-496. Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The U. S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Sinclair, Barbara. 1999. “Transformational Leader or Faithful Agent? Principal- Agent Theory and House Majority Party Leadership.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24(3): 421-449. Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Smith, Steven S. and Deering, Christopher J. 1990. Committees in Congress. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Sundquist, James L. 1988. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103(4): 613-635. Taylor, Andrew J. 1998. “Explaining Government Productivity.” American Political Quarterly 26(4): 439-458. Tsebelis, G. 1995. “Decision making in Political Systems: Veto players in Presidentialism, Parliamentalism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 289-325. Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Whitaker, Richard. 2005. “National Parties in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics 6 (1): 5-28. Weingast, Barry R., and William J. Marshall. 1988 “The Industrial Organization of Congress.” Journal of Political Economy 96(1): 132-163. Zittel, Thomas and Dominic Nyhuis. 2019. “Two Faces of Party Unity: Roll-Call Behavior and Vote Explanations in the German Bundestag.” Parliamentary Affairs 72(2): 406-424.zh_TW