Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 論國家的科技實力： 指標建構與大國科技實力對比的趨勢分析
On Nations’ Technological Prowess: Index Construction and Trend Analysis of Great Power Technological Capabilities in Comparative Perspective作者 周冠竹
Chou, Kuan-chu貢獻者 張文揚<br>傅澤民
Chang, Weng-Yang<br>Fu, Tse-Min
周冠竹
Chou, Kuan-chu關鍵詞 總體科技能力
科技與國際關係
美中科技競爭
科技發展
Technological Development
Comprehensive Technological Power
Technology and International Relations
US-China Technological Competition日期 2024 上傳時間 4-Sep-2024 16:09:49 (UTC+8) 摘要 科技實力是大國政治的重要資源，在國際關係的重要性不言可喻。然而，針對如何衡量一國的科技實力，文獻目前仍莫衷一是。透過結合金融權力、人力資本和智慧財產權等三個面向，本論文首先提出一個測量國家科技實力的指標。據此，我們得以展示全球科技能力的分布。本論文接著將重心置於美國與中國，以及巴西與墨西哥的科技實力對比。作者發現，美國在核心技術和創新轉化能力上仍保持領先，而中國雖在特定領域迅速追趕，但整體差距尚存。此外，巴西和墨西哥的對比研究則突顯了政治穩定和經濟開放度對科技創新的重要影響。本論文提出，要提升國家的科技競爭力，需投資於教育、保持經濟政策穩定、推動完善且開放的金融體系，並維護一個促進智慧財產權保護和技術創新的環境。這些策略對於國家總體科技發展與全球競爭至關重要。
Technological prowess has become the critical resource of great power politics, and its significance in international relations is indisputable. However, the literature remains divided on how to measure a country’s technological strength. By combining three dimensions—financial power, human capital, and intellectual property rights—this paper proposes a new index to gauge national technological capabilities. Using this index, we demonstrate the global distribution of technological power. The paper then focuses on comparing the technological strengths of the United States and China, as well as Brazil and Mexico. The Author finds that while China has rapidly caught up in specific areas, the United States still maintains its lead in core technologies and innovation conversion capabilities, with an overall gap persisting. Moreover, the comparative study of Brazil and Mexico highlights the crucial influence of political stability and economic openness on technological innovation. This paper suggests that to enhance a country's technological competitiveness, investments in education, stable economic policies, a well-developed and open financial system, and an environment conducive to intellectual property protection and technological innovation are essential. These strategies are critical for a nation's overall technological development and global competitiveness.參考文獻 中文文獻 人民網。 (2022)。國家網信辦：滴滴存在嚴重影響國家安全的數據處理活動。取自 http://finance.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2022/0721/c1004-32482059.html。 丁緯、李政倫、劉洪鈞。 (2014)。違約風險與盈餘穩健性之關聯性：中國國營V.S.民營企業。《會計與財金研究》，7(2)，71-83。https://doi.org/10.6735/JAFD.201409_7(2).0004 中國國家統計局。 (2020)。國家數據—研究生和留學生人數。取自 https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01。 中國國家統計局。 (2021)。2020年全國科技經費投入統計公報。取自 http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/rdpcgb/qgkjjftrtjgb/202302/t20230206_1902130.html。 中華人民共和國中央人民政府。 (2008)。關於建立海外高階留學人才回國工作綠色通道的意見。取自 https://www.gov.cn/ztzl/kjfzgh/content_883681.htm。 任澤平。 (2020)。中國中小微企業經營狀況。香港: 盈立證券。取自 https://www.usmart.hk/en/news-detail/6877635556050845714。 門洪華與劉笑陽。 (2015)。中國夥伴關係策略評估與展望。《世界經濟與政治》，2，65–95。 周冠竹，(未定)。誰遙遙領先？權力轉移論與美中科技能力評估。《問題與研究》，即將出版。 茅海建。 (1996)。鴉片戰爭清朝軍費考。《山西財經學院學報》，2，4。 洪世章、許瓊文與何泰宇. (2013). 建構創新系統績效衡量指標.《科技管理學刊》，18(3)，57–91。 重慶日報。 (2019)。重慶為高層次人才提供最高2000萬元‘人才貸’。取自 https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/02/content_5405239.htm。 烏云其其格等。 (2009)。我國高層次科技人才回歸不足現象及原因分析。取自 http://qwgzyj.gqb.gov.cn/yjytt/147/1399.shtml。 烏凌翔（2022）。美中科技戰與權力轉移-熱戰可以被避免嗎?。未出版之士論文，國立台灣大學，台北。 孫學峰, 丁鲁。 (2017)。夥伴國類型與中國夥伴關係升級。《世界經濟與政治》，2，54–76。 清華大學。 (2001)。培養又紅又專的優秀人才—清華大學教育思想集萃。取自 https://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/2030/78977.htm。 張建華。 (2018)。20世紀五六十年代的留蘇學人及其視野中的‘蘇聯形象’。《華僑華人歷史研究》，(1)，52-60。 深圳證券交易所。 (2020)。發行上市條件。取自 https://www.szse.cn/ipo/guide/requirements/index.html。 陳麒安與吳崇涵。 (2022)。南韓在美國與中國之間的避險戰略。《問題與研究》，61(2)，1–49。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.202206_61(2).0001 楊一逵與陳秉逵。(2020)。中共網際權力之初探：以資訊與通訊科技在國際合作中之吸引力為觀察。《中國大陸研究》，63(3)，119–172。DOI: 10.30389/MCS.202009_63(3).0004 領英人才洞察。 (2023)。2022年中國留學生歸國求職洞察報告。取自 https://business.linkedin.com/content/dam/me/business/zh-cn/talent-solutions/Event/2022/Aug/2022-chinese-overseas-student-report.pdf。 鄭子真。 (2023)。 新世紀日本的太空發展：以太空外交和軍民兩用觀點為主。《問題與研究》，62(2)，117–154。DOI: 10.30390/ISC.202306_62(2).0004 劉孟俊。 (2017)。近年中國大陸全球大型併購之趨勢及意涵。《經濟前瞻》，169，56-61。 英文文獻 Academy, E. (2017, August 2). Paid to Publish: The Chinese Cash Cow. Enago Academy. https://www.enago.com/academy/paid-to-publish-the-chinese-cash-cow/ Adeyemi, R. A., Joel, A., Ebenezer, J. T., & Attah, E. Y. (2018). The Effect of Brain Drain on the Economic Development of Developing Countries: Evidence from Selected African Countries. Journal of Health and Social Issues (JOHESI) Vol, 7(2), 66–76. Agarwal, H., & Agarwal, R. (2017). First Industrial Revolution and Second Industrial Revolution: Technological differences and the differences in banking and financing of the firms. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(11), 1062–1066. Agénor, P. (2003). Benefits and Costs of International Financial Integration: Theory and Facts. World Economy, 26(8), 1089–1118. Alexy, O. T., Block, J. H., Sandner, P., & Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2012). Social Capital of Venture Capitalists and Start-up Funding. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9337-4 Alexy, O. T., Block, J. H., Sandner, P., & Wal, A. L. J. T. (2012). Social capital of venture capitalists and start-up funding. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 835–851. Allen, G. C. (2023, July 18). CSIS Translation: Updated Japanese Export Controls on High-Performance Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/csis-translation-updated-japanese-export-controls-high-performance-semiconductor Allison, G., Klyman, K., Barbesino, K., & Yen, H. (2021). The Great Tech Rivalry: China vs the U.S. (Avoiding Great Power War Project Paper Series). Harvard Kennedy School. Allison, G. T., Klyman, K., Barbesino, K., & Yen, H. (2021). The Great Tech Rivalry: China vs the U.S. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Altbach, P. G. (2004). Higher Education Crosses Borders: Can the United States Remain the Top Destination for Foreign Students? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(2), 18–25. American Academy of Arts & Science. (2020). The Perils of Complacency: America at a Tipping Point in Science & Engineering. American Academy of Arts & Science. Aminullah, E. (2015). Learning, R&D Intensity and economic prosperity in low R&D countries (LRDCs): Envisioning the Indonesian future. 15–17. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Furtado, D., & Xu, H. (2019). OPT Policy Changes and Foreign Born STEM Talent in the U.S. Labour Economics, 61, 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101752 Anders, T., Fariss, C. J., & Markowitz, J. N. (2020). Bread Before Guns or Butter: Introducing Surplus Domestic Product (SDP). International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 392–405. Arbix, G. (2019). Innovation Policy in Brazil since 2003: Advances, Incoherencies, and Discontinuities. Innovation in Brazil: Advancing Development in the 21st Century, 3. Arestis, P., & Demetriades, P. (1999). Financial Liberalization: The Experience of Developing Countries. Eastern Economic Journal, 25(4), 441–457. Banco Central do Brasil. (2021). The Real Plan [Banco Central do Brasil]. The Real Plan. https://www.bcb.gov.br/en/monetarypolicy/realplan Barut, A., Citil, M., Ahmed, Z., Sinha, A., & Abbas, S. (2023). How Do Economic and Financial Factors Influence Green Logistics? A Comparative Analysis of E7 and G7 Nations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(1), 1011–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22252-0 Beck, T., Crivelli, J. M., & Summerhill, W. (2005). State Bank Transformation in Brazil – Choices and Consequences. Bank Privatization, 29(8), 2223–2257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.014 Beckley, M. (2018). The Power of Nations: Measuring What Matters. International Security, 43(2), 7–44. Bogdanski, J., Tombini, A. A., & Werlang, S. R. da C. (2000). Implementing Inflation Targeting in Brazil. Werlang, Sergio R., Implementing Inflation Targeting in Brazil (July 2000). Banco Central Do Brasil Working Paper, 1. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Massetti, E., & Tavoni, M. (2008a). International energy R&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization. Technological Change and the Environment, 30(6), 2912–2929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.04.008 Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Massetti, E., & Tavoni, M. (2008b). International Energy R&D Spillovers and the Economics of Greenhouse Gas Atmospheric Stabilization. Technological Change and the Environment, 30(6), 2912–2929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.04.008 Brewer, E., & Genay, H. (1995). Small Business Investment Companies: Financial Characteristics and Investments. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(3), 38. https://proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/small-business-investment-companies-financial/docview/220955663/se-2?accountid=10067 Brewer, E., Genay, H., Jackson, W. E., & Worthington, P. R. (1996). Performance and Access to Government Guarantees: The Case of Small Business Investment Companies. Economic Perspectives, 20, 16–30. Brooks, H. (1994). The Relationship between Science and Technology. Research Policy, 23(5), 477–486. Brunt, L. (2006). Rediscovering Risk: Country Banks as Venture Capital Firms in the First Industrial Revolution. The Journal of Economic History, 66(1), 74–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3875106 Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259. Bu, L. (1999). Educational exchange and cultural diplomacy in the Cold War. Journal of American Studies, 33(3), 393–415. Bwalya, S. M. (2006). Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Spillovers: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis of Manufacturing Firms in Zambia. Journal of Development Economics, 81(2), 514–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.06.011 Cao, C. (2008). China’s Brain Drain at the High End. Asian Population Studies, 4(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730802496532 Carlaw, K. I., & Lipsey, R. G. (2003). Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth: What is the Relationship? Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(3), 457–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00201 Carlson, T. E., & Hayes, J. F. (2005). The Small Business Provisions of the 2005 Bankruptcy Amendments. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 79, 645. Carrillo-Carrillo, F., & Alcalde-Heras, H. (2020). Modes of Innovation in an Emerging Economy: A Firm-level Analysis from Mexico. Innovation, 22(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1735395 Casper, G., & Tufis, C. (2003). Correlation Versus Interchangeability: The Limited Robustness of Empirical Findings on Democracy Using Highly Correlated Data Sets. Political Analysis, 11(2), 196–203. Castaneda, D. I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3), 159–173. Castilla, E. J. (2003). Networks of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(1–2), 113–135. Chan, S. (2005). Is There a Power Transition between the U.S. and China? The Different Faces of National Power. Asian Survey, 45(5), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2005.45.5.687 Chand, M. (2019). Brain Drain, Brain Circulation, and the African Diaspora in the United States. Journal of African Business, 20(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2018.1440461 Chang, P., & Deng, Z. (1992). The Chinese Brain Drain and Policy Options. Studies in Comparative International Development, 27, 44–60. Chiarini, T., Cimini, F., Rapini, M. S., & Silva, L. A. (2020). The Political Economy of Innovation: Why is Brazil Stuck in the Technology Ladder? Brazilian Political Science Review, 14. Chinn, M. D., & Ito, H. (2008). A New Measure of Financial Openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 10(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802231123 Chou, K., & Fu, T. (2024). The Great Tech Race: Quantifying the Unseen Power among Great Powers. APSA 2024 Annual Meeting. APSA 2024 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia. Chung, E. (2022, August 1). U.S. Passes CHIPS Act, Increasing Restrictions on China Lead to Rising Geopolitical Risk, Says Trendforce. TrendForce. https://www.trendforce.com/presscenter/news/20220801-11322.html Clay, I., & Atkinson, R. (2023). Wake Up, America: China Is Overtaking the United States in Innovation Output. Hamilton Center on Industrial Strategy. Colombo, D. G. e, & Cruz, H. N. da. (2023). Impact Assessment of Innovation Tax Incentives in Brazil. Innovation & Management Review, 20(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-11-2020-0167 Corona, J. M., Dutrénit, G., Puchet, M., & Santiago, F. (2014). The Changing Role of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Building Systems of Innovation: The Case of Mexico. In G. Crespi & G. Dutrénit (Eds.), Science, Technology and Innovation Policies for Development: The Latin American Experience (pp. 15–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04108-7_2 Cozzens, S. E. (1997). The knowledge pool: Measurement challenges in evaluating fundamental research programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(96)00038-9 Crossa, M., & Ebner, N. (2020). Automotive Global Value Chains in Mexico: A Mirage of Development? Third World Quarterly, 41(7), 1218–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1761252 Da Fonseca, M. A. R. (1998). Brazil’s Real Plan. Journal of Latin American Studies, 30(3), 619–639. Dahlman, C. J. (2007). China and India: Emerging Technological Powers. Issues in Science and Technology, 23(3), 45–53. Daugeliene, R., & Marcinkeviciene, R. (2009). Brain Circulation: Theoretical Considerations. Engineering Economics, 63(3). De Negri, F., & Rauen, A. T. (2018). Innovation Policies in Brazil During the 2000s: The Need for New Paths (235). Institute for Applied Economic Research. de Paula, L. F. (2012). Financial Liberalization and Economic Performance: Brazil at the Crossroads. Routledge. Deeg, R., & Hardie, I. (2016). ‘What Is Patient Capital and Who Supplies It?’ Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww025 Deitz, S., & Freyman, C. (2024). The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2024 (NSB-2024-3). U.S. National Science Foundation. Deloitte. (2021). Law 11,196/05 – “Lei do Bem” Tax Incentive for Technological Innovation [Deloitte]. https://www2.deloitte.com/br/en/pages/tax/solutions/lei-do-bem.html Ding, J. (2023). The Diffusion Deficit in Scientific and Technological Power: Re-assessing China’s Rise. Review of International Political Economy, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2023.2173633 Dobrzański, P., Bobowski, S., Chrysostome, E., Velinov, E., & Strouhal, J. (2021). Toward Innovation-Driven Competitiveness across African Countries: An Analysis of the Efficiency of R&D Expenditures. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(1). Docquier, F., Lohest, O., & Marfouk, A. (2007). Brain Drain in Developing Countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 21(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhm008 Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012). Globalization, Brain Drain, and Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3), 681–730. Dos Santos, M. E. R., & Torkomian, A. L. V. (2013). Technology Transfer and Innovation: The Role of the Brazilian TTOs. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 12(1), 89–111. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S., & León, L. R. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What Is the Future of Innovation-driven Growth? World Intellectual Property Organization. https://doi.org/10.34667/TIND.46596 Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Shapira, P. (2016). Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711856 Engelbrecht, H.-J. (1997). International R&D Spillovers, Human Capital and Productivity in OECD Economies: An Empirical Investigation. European Economic Review, 41(8), 1479–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00046-3 Ernst, C. (2005). The FDI–employment Link in a Globalizing World: The Case of Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Employment Strategy Papers, 17, 1–45. Errunza, V. (2001). Foreign Portfolio Equity Investments, Financial Liberalization, and Economic Development. Review of International Economics, 9(4), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9396.00308 Escobar, H. (2017, October 20). In Brazil, Researchers Struggle to Fend off Deepening Budget Cuts. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/brazil-researchers-struggle-fend-deepening-budget-cuts Eyal-Cohen, M. (2011). Why is Small Business the Chief Business of Congress. Rutgers LJ, 43, 1. Feijo, C., Lamônica, M. T., & Lima, S. S. (2019). Financial Liberalization and Structural Change: The Brazilian Case in the 2000s. Economia e Sociedade, 28, 177–200. Ferrary, M., & Granovetter, M. (2009). The Role of Venture Capital Firms in Silicon Valley’s Complex innovation Network. Economy and Society, 38(2), 326–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140902786827 Forero-Pineda, C., Laureiro-Martinez, D., & Marín, A. (2011). Innovation Patterns and Intellectual Property in SME´s of a Developing Country. Innovar, 21(42). https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/innovation-patterns-intellectual-property-sme´s/docview/1677603398/se-2?accountid=13877 France 24. (2022, March 1). Disillusioned and ’Betrayed’—Brazilians Flock Abroad. France 24. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20220301-disillusioned-and-betrayed-brazilians-flock-abroad Frantzen, D. (2000). R&D, Human Capital and International Technology Spillovers: A Cross-country Analysis. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00184 Fuglie, K. (2018). R&D Capital, R&D Spillovers, and Productivity Growth in World Agriculture. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(3), 421–444. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002a). The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002b). The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4 Gaida, J., Jennifer, W.-L., Stephan, R., & Danielle. (2023). Policy Brief: ASPI’s Critical Technology Tracker: The Global Race for Future Power (69/2023). The Australian Strategic Policy Institute. Garcia, L. R. (2009). European markets as challenges or opportunities for Mexican SMEs internationalization: A critical analysis of globalization. In The Nation in the Global Era (pp. 262–288). Brill. Gardner, J. W. (1951). The Foreign Student in America. Foreign Aff., 30, 637. Geisler, E. (2000). The Metrics of Science and Technology. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. Gibbons, M., & Johnston, R. (1974). The Roles of Science in Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 3(3), 220–242. Gilpin, R. (1988). The Theory of Hegemonic War. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/204816 Gilpin, Robert. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. In War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press. Godin, B. (2009). National Innovation System: The System Approach in Historical Perspective. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34(4), 476–501. Gompers, P. A. (1994). The rise and fall of venture capital. Business and Economic History, 1–26. Government of Brazil. (2024, February 22). Federal Government Budget. Government of Brazil. https://www1.siop.planejamento.gov.br/QvAJAXZfc/opendoc.htm?document=IAS%2FExecucao_Orcamentaria.qvw&host=QVS%40pqlk04&anonymous=true&sheet=SH15 Graham, E. (2024, March 5). Pentagon Official Says US Values Will Outcompete Beijing in AI. Nextgov/FCW. https://www.nextgov.com/artificial-intelligence/2024/03/pentagon-official-says-us-values-will-outcompete-beijing-ai/394700/ Guerrero, M., & Link, A. N. (2022). Public support of innovative activity in small and large firms in Mexico. Small Business Economics, 59(1), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00517-1 Guglielmi, G. (2019). Mexican Science Suffers under Debilitating Budget Cuts. Nature, 572(7769), 294–296. Guo, R., Ning, L., & Chen, K. (2022). How Do Human Capital and R&D Structure Facilitate FDI Knowledge Spillovers to Local Firm Innovation? A Panel Threshold Approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(6), 1921–1947. Haas, P. M. (1989). Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control. International Organization, 43(3), 377–403. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442 Haber, S. (2005). Mexico’s Experiments with Bank Privatization and Liberalization, 1991–2003. Bank Privatization, 29(8), 2325–2353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.017 Hammar, N., & Belarbi, Y. (2021). R&D, Innovation and Productivity Relationships: Evidence from Threshold Panel Model. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 5(3), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2021.06.002 Han, F., & Zhu, L. (2013). Linkage Effects of Trade Openness and Financial Openness on Technological Progress. In E. Qi, J. Shen, & R. Dou (Eds.), Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 139–147). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Han, X., & Appelbaum, R. P. (2018). China’s Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Research Evironment: A Snapshot. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0195347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195347 Herman, A. (2024, May 22). Biden Is Losing the High-Tech War with China. Hudson Institute. https://www.hudson.org/technology/biden-losing-high-tech-war-china-arthur-herman Hiskey, J., Malone, M. F. T., & Diaz-Dominguez, A. (2020). Authoritarian Recall: Mexico’s Drug War and Subnational Patterns of Opposition to Democracy. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 12(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X20913287 Hodgson, G. M. (2021). Financial Institutions and the British Industrial Revolution: Did Financial Underdevelopment Hold Back Growth? Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742000065X Horowitz, M. C. (2018). Artificial intelligence, international competition, and the balance of power (May 2018). Texas National Security Review. Horowitz, M. C. (2020). Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032725 Huang, Y. (2023). The Rise and Fall of the EAST. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300274912 Hudson, J., & Minea, A. (2013). Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, and Economic Development: A Unified Empirical Investigation. World Development, 46, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.023 Human Right Watch. (2019, March 21). China: Government Threats to Academic Freedom Abroad. Human Right Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/03/21/china-government-threats-academic-freedom-abroad Ighoshemu, B. O., & Ogidiagba, U. B. (2022). Poor Governance and Massive Unemployment in Nigeria: As causes of Brain Drain in the Buhari Administration (2015-2020). Insights into Regional Development, 4(2), 73–84. Inderst, R., & Müller, H. M. (2004). The Effect of Capital Market Characteristics on the Value of Start-up firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(2), 319–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.06.001 International Monetary Fund. (2022). Mexico: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Financial System Stability Assessment (IMF Country Report No. 22/335). International Monetary Fund. International Trade Administration. (2019, October 17). Mexico—E. Automotive Parts and Supplies. International Trade Administration. https://www.export.gov/apex/article2?id=Mexico-Automotive-Parts-and-Supplies James, J., & Romijn, H. (1997a). The Determinants of Technological Capability: A Cross‐country Analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 25(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600819708424129 James, J., & Romijn, H. (1997b). The Determinants of Technological Capability: A Cross‐country Analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 25(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600819708424129 Johnson, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence & future warfare: Implications for international security. Defense & Security Analysis, 35(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2019.1600800 Kennedy, A. B. (2015). Powerhouses or Pretenders? Debating China’s and India’s Emergence as Technological Powers. The Pacific Review, 28(2), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.995126 Kennedy, A. B. (2024). The Process of Paradigm Change: The Rise of Guided Innovation in China. Review of International Political Economy, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2023.2280974 Kessler, T. P. (1998). Political Capital: Mexican Financial Policy under Salinas. World Politics, 51(1), 36–66. Khan, M. K., He, Y., Akram, U., Zulfiqar, S., & Usman, M. (2018). Firms’ Technology Innovation Activity: Does Financial Structure Matter? Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 47(2), 329–353. Khoury, T. A., & Peng, M. W. (2011). Does Institutional Reform of Intellectual Property Rights Lead to More Inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. Languages Special Issue Section, 46(3), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.07.015 Kinoshita, Y. (2000). R&D and Technology Spillovers via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity. Available at SSRN 258194. Klingler-Vidra, R. (2016). When Venture Capital is Patient Capital: Seed Funding as a Source of Patient Capital for High-growth Companies. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww022 Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–645. http://www.jstor.org/stable/155168 Kostoff, R. N. (2008). Comparison of China/USA Science and Technology Performance. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.06.004 Kowaltowski, A. J. (2021). Brazil’s Scientists Face 90% Budget Cut. Nature, 598(7882), 566–566. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02882-z Kuo, L., & Cadell, C. (2024, March 14). Chinese Students, Academics Say They’re Facing Extra Scrutiny Entering U.S. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/14/china-united-states-university-students-border/ Kwok, V., & Leland, H. (1982). An Economic Model of the Brain Drain. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 91–100. Lawan Ngoma, A., & Wana Ismail, N. (2013). The Determinants of Brain Drain in Developing Countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 40(8), 744–754. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-05-2013-0109 Lederman, N. G. (2013). Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Routledge. Lee, J. (2023, November 18). How the ‘Fab 4’ Can Bring Clarity to Semiconductor Supply Chains. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2023/11/how-the-fab-4-can-bring-clarity-to-semiconductor-supply-chains/ Lehrer, M., & Celo, S. (2016a). German family capitalism in the 21st century: Patient capital between bifurcation and symbiosis. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 729–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww023 Lehrer, M., & Celo, S. (2016b). German Family Capitalism in the 21st Century: Patient Capital between Bifurcation and Symbiosis. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 729–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww023 Lejour, A., & Nahuis, R. (2005). R&D Spillovers and Growth: Specialization Matters. Review of International Economics, 13(5), 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2005.00545.x Lewallen, J. (2021). Emerging technologies and problem definition uncertainty: The case of cybersecurity. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1035–1052. Liu, Y., Woywode, M., & Xing, Y. (2012). High Technology Start-up Innovation and the Role of Guanxi: An Explorative Study in China from an Institutional Perspective. Prometheus, 30(2), 211–229. Lloyd, M. (2018, November 2). Bolsonaro Poses a Serious Threat to Higher Education. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20181102101957300 Lopez-Acevedo, G., & Tinajero, M. (2010). Mexico: Impact Evaluation of SME Programs Using Panel Firm Data. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5186. López-Martínez, R. E., Medellín, E., Scanlon, A. P., & Solleiro, J. L. (1994). Motivations and Obstacles to University Industry Cooperation (UIC): A Mexican Case. R&D Management, 24(1), 017–030. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00844.x Lundvall, B. (2007). National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863 Lustig, N. (1995). The Mexican Peso Crisis: The Foreseeable and the Surprise. Brookings Institute. Maia, G. (1999). Restructuring the Banking System–the Case of Brazil. BIS Policy Papers, 6, 106–123. Mani, S. (2006). Epistemic communities and informed policy making for promoting innovations: The case of Singapore. Science and Technology Policy for Development, Dialogues at the Interface, 73–87. Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2023). Hegemony and Inequality in Global Science: Problems of the Center-periphery Model. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 31–52. Marques, F. (2011, April). José Israel Vargas: From Crisis to Opportunity. Revista Pesquisa. https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/en/jose-israel-vargas-from-crisis-to-opportunity/ Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment. Centre for International Economic Studies Working Paper, 22. Maskus, K. E., Neumann, R., & Seidel, T. (2012). How National and International Financial Development Affect Industrial R&D. European Economic Review, 56(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.06.002 Matthews, D. (2023, July 18). Germany Moves to Create New Restrictions on Research Cooperation with China. Science|Business. https://sciencebusiness.net/news/dual-use/germany-moves-create-new-restrictions-research-cooperation-china McKnight, J. B., & Muggenburg, R. (1993). Mexico’s New Intellectual Property Regime: Improvements in the Protection of Industrial Property, Copyright, License, and Franchise Rights in Mexico. International Lawyer, 27(1), 27. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The tragedy of great power politics / John J. Mearsheimer, University of Chicago. (Updated edition.). W.W. Norton & Company. Minella, A., de Freitas, P. S., Goldfajn, I., & Muinhos, M. K. (2003). Inflation Targeting in Brazil: Constructing Credibility Under Exchange Rate Volatility. Regional and International Implications of the Financial Instability in Latin America, 22(7), 1015–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2003.09.008 Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2021). Comunidade Brasileira no Exterior – Estatísticas 2020. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. https://www.gov.br/mre/pt-br/assuntos/portal-consular/artigos-variados/comunidade-brasileira-no-exterior-2013-estatisticas-2020 Moed, H. (2002). Measuring China" s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53(3), 281–296. Møller, J., & Skaaning, S.-E. (2011). On the Limited Interchangeability of Rule of Law Measures. European Political Science Review, 3(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000421 Morgenthau, H. (1947). Politics Among Nations (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Musacchio, A. (2012). Mexico’s Financial Crisis of 1994-1995 (Harvard Business School Working Paper). Harvard Business School. National Science Foundation. (2023, January 4). U.S. R&D Increased by $51 Billion in 2020 to $717 Billion; Estimate for 2021 Indicates Further Increase to $792 Billion [National Science Foundation]. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf23320 Nelson, R. R. (1992). National Innovation Systems: A Retrospective on a Study. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(2), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/1.2.347 Nunes, F., & Melo, C. R. (2017). Impeachment, Political Crisis and Democracy in Brazil. Revista de Ciencia Política, 37(2), 281–304. OECD. (2015). The Innovation Imperative: Contributing to Productivity, Growth and Well-Being. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239814-en O’Mara, M. (2012). The Uses of the Foreign Student. Social Science History, 36(4), 583–615. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23361144 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2024). International Trade in Services. OECD. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?fs[0]=Topic%2C1%7CTrade%23TRD%23%7CTrade%20in%20goods%20and%20services%23TRD_GDS%23&pg=0&fc=Topic&bp=true&snb=21&vw=tb&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_BOP%40DF_TIS&df[ag]=OECD.SDD.TPS&df[vs]=1.0&dq=USA.CHN.SH.C..A.USD_EXC.&pd=1996%2C2020&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false Organski, A. F. K. (1958). World Politics (2nd ed.). Alfred A. Knopf. Organski, A. F. K. (1968). World Politics / by A. F. K. Organski. In World politics (2nd ed.). Alfred A. Knopf. Organski, A. F., & Kugler, J. (1980). The War Ledger. University of Chicago Press. Pacheco, C. A. (2019). Institutional Dimensions of Innovation Policy in Brazil. Innovation in Brazil: Advancing Development in the 21st Century, 171–188. Padilla, R., & Fenton Ontañon, R. (2013). Commercial Bank Financing for Micro-enterprises and SMEs in Mexico. Cepal Review. Pelaez, V., INVERNIZZi, N., Fuck, M. P., Bagatolli, C., & Oliveira, M. R. de. (2017). The Volatility of S&T Policy Agenda in Brazil. Revista de Administração Pública, 51, 788–809. Pellegrino, A. (2001). Trends in Latin American Skilled Migration: “Brain Drain” or “Brain Exchange”? International Migration, 39(5), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00174 Pierrakis, Y., & Owen, R. (2022). Startup Ventures and Equity Finance: How do Business Accelerators and Business Angels’ Assess the Human capital of Socio-Environmental Mission Led Entrepreneurs? Innovation, 1–25. Pierrakis, Y., & Owen, R. (2023). Startup ventures and Equity Finance: How Do Business Accelerators and Business Angels’ Assess the Human Capital of Socio-environmental Mission Led Entrepreneurs? Innovation, 25(4), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2022.2029706 Pierrakis, Y., & Saridakis, G. (2019). The Role of Venture Capitalists in the Regional Innovation Ecosystem: A Comparison of Networking Patterns between Private and Publicly Backed Venture Capital Funds. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(3), 850–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9622-8 Pineli, A., & Narula, R. (2023). Industrial Policy Matters: The Co-evolution of Economic Structure, Trade, and FDI in Brazil and Mexico, 2000–2015. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 50(2), 399–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00262-4 Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., & Bennett, S. E. (2017). Venture Capital Investment, Financial Development, and Economic growth: The Case of European Single Market Countries. Venture Capital, 19(4), 313–333. Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., Bennett, S. E., Bahmani, S., & Hall, J. H. (2018). Endogenous Dynamics Between Innovation, Financial Markets, Venture Capital and Economic Growth: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 45, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2018.01.002 Quinn, D., Schindler, M., & Toyoda, A. M. (2011). Assessing Measures of Financial Openness and Integration. IMF Economic Review, 59(3), 488–522. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2011.18 Rafique, M. Z., Li, Y., Larik, A. R., & Monaheng, M. P. (2020). Effects of FDI, Technological Innovation, and Financial Development on CO2 Emissions: An Empirical Study of the BRICS Nations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(19), 23899–23913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08715-2 Ramoniene, L., & Lanskoronskis, M. (2011). Reflection of Higher Education Aspects in the Conception of National Competitiveness. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(1), 124–139. Rauch, C. (2017). Challenging the Power Consensus: GDP, CINC, and Power Transition Theory. Security Studies, 26(4), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1336389 Rezende, S. M. (2010). Brazil: Challenges and Achievements. Issues in Science and Technology, 26(3), 61–68. Rocha, F. (2015). Does Governmental Support to Innovation Have Positive Effect on R&D Investments? Evidence from Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 14(especial), 37–60. Rodrigues, M. (2021). Scientists Reel as Brazilian Government Backtracks on Research Funds. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02886-9 Romer, P. M. (1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138148 Samsung Newsroom. (2024, April 15). Samsung Electronics to Receive up to $6.4 Billion in Direct Funding under the CHIPS and Science Act. Samsung Newsroom U.S. https://news.samsung.com/us/samsung-electronics-to-receive-up-to-6-4-billion-in-direct-funding-under-the-chips-and-science-act Saravia, N. G., & Miranda, J. F. (2004). Plumbing the Brain Drain. World Health Organization. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(8), 608–615. Saxenian, A. (2002a). The Silicon Valley Connection: Transnational Networks and Regional Development in Taiwan, China and India. Science, Technology and Society, 7(1), 117–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180200700106 Saxenian, A. (2002b). Transnational Communities and the Evolution of Global Production Networks: The Cases of Taiwan, China and India. Industry and Innovation, 9(3), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271022000034453 Saxenian, A. (2005). From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686293 Schmid, J. (2023, August 16). Rethinking Who’s Winning the U.S.-China Tech Competition. Rand Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/08/rethinking-whos-winning-the-us-china-tech-competition.html Schumpeter, J. Alois. (1983). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. In The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Books. Serajuddin, U., & Hamadeh, N. (2020, July 1). New World Bank Country Classifications by Income Level: 2020-2021. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/opendata/new-world-bank-country-classifications-income-level-2020-2021 Shao, Y., & Sun, L. (2021). Entrepreneurs’ Social Capital and Venture Capital Financing. Journal of Business Research, 136, 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.005 Singh, J., & Krishna, V. V. (2015). Trends in Brain Drain, Gain and Circulation: Indian Experience of Knowledge Workers. Science, Technology and Society, 20(3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721815597132 Sobreira, R., & de Paula, L. F. (2010). The 2008 Financial Crisis and Banking Behavior in Brazil: The Role of the Prudential Regulation. Journal of Innovation Economics, 2, 77–93. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513 Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Capital Market Liberalization, Economic Growth, and Instability. World Development, 28(6), 1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00006-1 Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalization and growth in emerging markets and the new economy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25(5), 505–524. Strüver, G. (2016). What Friends Are Made of: Bilateral Linkages and Domestic Drivers of Foreign Policy Alignment with China. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(2), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12050 Sulisworo, D. (2016). The Contribution of the Education System Quality to Improve the Nation’s Competitiveness of Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 10(2), 127–138. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. (2024, April 8). TSMC Arizona and U.S. Department of Commerce Announce up to US$6.6 Billion in Proposed CHIPS Act Direct Funding, the Company Plans Third Leading-Edge Fab in Phoenix. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited. https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/3122 Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does Higher Economic and Financial Development Lead to Environmental Degradation? Evidence from the BRIC Countries. Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025 Tharenou, P., & Seet, P.-S. (2014). China’s Reverse Brain Drain. International Studies of Management & Organization, 44(2), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825440203 The Observatory of Economic Complexity. (2023). China and United States Trade. The Observatory of Economic Complexity. https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/chn/partner/usa?depthBalanceProductSelector=HS4Depth The US Department of Energy. (2022, December 22). The Life of Enrico Fermi. The US Department of Energy. https://science.osti.gov/fermi/The-Life-of-Enrico-Fermi The World Bank. (2022, September 16). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators The World Bank. (2023a). Central Government debt, total (% of GDP)—Brazil. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org The World Bank. (2023b). External Debt Stocks (% of GNI)—Brazil. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org The World Bank. (2023c). Gross Savings (% of GNI)—Brazil, Mexico, Upper Middle Income. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org The World Bank. (2023d, September 19). Government Expenditure on Education, Total (% of GDP). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.XPD.TOTL.GD.ZS The World Bank. (2023e, November 27). Researchers in R&D (per million people)—Brazil, Latin America & Caribbean. The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org The World Bank. (2024a). Charges for the Use of Intellectual Property, Receipts (BoP, current US$). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.GSR.ROYL.CD The World Bank. (2024b). GDP (constant 2015$). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD Tipalti. (2020, October). Unicorn Hunting. Tipalti. https://tipalti.com/unicorn-hunting/ Torres Filho, E., Macahyba, L., & Zeidan, R. M. (2014). Restructuring Brazil’s National Financial System (IRIBA Working Paper: 06). International Research Initiative on Brazil and Africa (IRIBA). Transparancy Interantional. (2021, January 28). 2020 Corruption Perceptions Index – Brazil. Transparency.Org. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020 Tung, R. L. (2008). Brain Circulation, Diaspora, and International Competitiveness. European Management Journal, 26(5), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.03.005 Tung, R. L., & Lazarova, M. (2006). Brain Drain versus Brain Gain: An Exploratory Study of Ex-host Country Nationals in Central and East Europe. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(11), 1853–1872. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190600999992 UN Comtrade. (2024). UN Comtrade. https://comtradeplus.un.org/TradeFlow United Nations Developement Programme. (2024). Human Development Report 2023/2024 (E.24.III.B.2). United Nations Developement Programme. United States Department of State. (2024, May 23). U.S.-Germany Joint Committee Meeting Deepens Science and Technology Cooperation. United States Department of State. https://www.state.gov/u-s-germany-joint-committee-meeting-deepens-science-and-technology-cooperation/ U.S. Immigration and Costoms Enforcement. (2022). 2007 to 2021 Annual Growth in OPT, STEM OPT and CPT Authorizations and Employment Authorization Document (EAD) Issuances. U.S. Immigration and Costoms Enforcement. https://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/pdf/2007-22_OPTGrowth.pdf Vaccaro, A. (2023). Measures of State Capacity: So Similar, yet so Different. Quality & Quantity, 57(3), 2281–2302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01466-x Villasana, M. (2011). Fostering University-industry Interactions under a Triple Helix Model: The Case of Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 38(1), 43–53. Waltz, K. (1979). Theories of International Politics. Waveland Pr Inc. Waltz, K. (1993). The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security, 18(2), 44–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539097 Weiner, G. (1998). Scholarship, Disciplinary Hegemony and Power in Academic Publishing. 20, 2005. Wen, Y., Qiao, L., & Xi, W. (2018, March 27). China Boosts Ideological Monitoring of Overseas Chinese, Returnees. Radio Free Asia. https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/monitoring-03272018113611.html Williams, B. K. (2023). The Innovation Race: US-China Science and Technology Competition and the Quantum Revolution. Wilson Center. Williamson, J. G. (1984). Why Was British Growth So Slow During the Industrial Revolution? The Journal of Economic History, 44(3), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700032320 Wionczek, M. S. (1981). On the Viability of a Policy for Science and Technology in Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 16(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100028090 Wu, L., Zhu, H., Chen, H., & Roco, M. C. (2019). Comparing Nanotechnology Landscapes in the US and China: A Patent Analysis Perspective. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 21(8), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4608-0 XE.com. (2024, April 19). Brazilian Real to US Dollar Exchange Rate Chart. XE.Com. https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=BRL&to=USD&view=10Y Yang, L., & Maskus, K. E. (2009). Intellectual Property Rights, Technology Transfer and Exports in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.11.003 Zhai, K., Gao, X., & Wang, G. (2019). Factors for Chinese Students Choosing Australian Higher Education and Motivation for Returning: A Systematic Review. SAGE Open, 9(2), 2158244019850263. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019850263 Zhang, M. Y. (2023, April 21). Chinese Tech Dominance More Myth than Reality. East Asia Forum. https://eastasiaforum.org/2023/04/21/chinese-tech-dominance-more-myth-than-reality/ Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Emergence of China as a Leading Nation in Science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006 Zider, B. (1998, November 1). How Venture Capital Works. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1998/11/how-venture-capital-works Zimmerman, J. (2010). Corporate Entrepreneurship at GE and Intel. Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS), 6(5). 描述 博士
國立政治大學
外交學系
107253501資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107253501 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 張文揚<br>傅澤民 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chang, Weng-Yang<br>Fu, Tse-Min en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 周冠竹 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chou, Kuan-chu en_US dc.creator (作者) 周冠竹 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chou, Kuan-chu en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-Sep-2024 16:09:49 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-Sep-2024 16:09:49 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Sep-2024 16:09:49 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107253501 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153574 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 外交學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107253501 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 科技實力是大國政治的重要資源，在國際關係的重要性不言可喻。然而，針對如何衡量一國的科技實力，文獻目前仍莫衷一是。透過結合金融權力、人力資本和智慧財產權等三個面向，本論文首先提出一個測量國家科技實力的指標。據此，我們得以展示全球科技能力的分布。本論文接著將重心置於美國與中國，以及巴西與墨西哥的科技實力對比。作者發現，美國在核心技術和創新轉化能力上仍保持領先，而中國雖在特定領域迅速追趕，但整體差距尚存。此外，巴西和墨西哥的對比研究則突顯了政治穩定和經濟開放度對科技創新的重要影響。本論文提出，要提升國家的科技競爭力，需投資於教育、保持經濟政策穩定、推動完善且開放的金融體系，並維護一個促進智慧財產權保護和技術創新的環境。這些策略對於國家總體科技發展與全球競爭至關重要。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Technological prowess has become the critical resource of great power politics, and its significance in international relations is indisputable. However, the literature remains divided on how to measure a country’s technological strength. By combining three dimensions—financial power, human capital, and intellectual property rights—this paper proposes a new index to gauge national technological capabilities. Using this index, we demonstrate the global distribution of technological power. The paper then focuses on comparing the technological strengths of the United States and China, as well as Brazil and Mexico. The Author finds that while China has rapidly caught up in specific areas, the United States still maintains its lead in core technologies and innovation conversion capabilities, with an overall gap persisting. Moreover, the comparative study of Brazil and Mexico highlights the crucial influence of political stability and economic openness on technological innovation. This paper suggests that to enhance a country's technological competitiveness, investments in education, stable economic policies, a well-developed and open financial system, and an environment conducive to intellectual property protection and technological innovation are essential. These strategies are critical for a nation's overall technological development and global competitiveness. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 科技能力指數建構 6 第一節 研究背景 6 第二節 文獻整理 8 第三節 國家科技能力指數 15 第四節 統計分析與效度檢測 21 第五節 科技能力指標應用 29 第六節 結論 36 第三章 科技能力比較一：美中科技能力比較 37 第一節 前言 37 第二節 中國作為科技強權辯論 38 第三節 美中科技能力三面向比較 41 第四節 新冠疫情後的美中科技能力競爭 53 第五節 結論 57 第四章 科技能力比較二：巴西與墨西哥 59 第一節 研究背景 59 第二節 個案比較 62 第三節 開發中國家科技發展困境 63 第四節 巴西與墨西哥科技能力比較 68 第五節 巴西：金融與政治危機下的科技能力發展 70 第六節 墨西哥：國際市場與人才外流 78 第七節 小節 85 第五章 結論 87 參考文獻 89 中文文獻 89 英文文獻 91 附錄 119 zh_TW dc.format.extent 3222450 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107253501 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 總體科技能力 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科技與國際關係 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 美中科技競爭 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科技發展 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Technological Development en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Comprehensive Technological Power en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Technology and International Relations en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) US-China Technological Competition en_US dc.title (題名) 論國家的科技實力： 指標建構與大國科技實力對比的趨勢分析 zh_TW dc.title (題名) On Nations’ Technological Prowess: Index Construction and Trend Analysis of Great Power Technological Capabilities in Comparative Perspective en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻 人民網。 (2022)。國家網信辦：滴滴存在嚴重影響國家安全的數據處理活動。取自 http://finance.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2022/0721/c1004-32482059.html。 丁緯、李政倫、劉洪鈞。 (2014)。違約風險與盈餘穩健性之關聯性：中國國營V.S.民營企業。《會計與財金研究》，7(2)，71-83。https://doi.org/10.6735/JAFD.201409_7(2).0004 中國國家統計局。 (2020)。國家數據—研究生和留學生人數。取自 https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01。 中國國家統計局。 (2021)。2020年全國科技經費投入統計公報。取自 http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/rdpcgb/qgkjjftrtjgb/202302/t20230206_1902130.html。 中華人民共和國中央人民政府。 (2008)。關於建立海外高階留學人才回國工作綠色通道的意見。取自 https://www.gov.cn/ztzl/kjfzgh/content_883681.htm。 任澤平。 (2020)。中國中小微企業經營狀況。香港: 盈立證券。取自 https://www.usmart.hk/en/news-detail/6877635556050845714。 門洪華與劉笑陽。 (2015)。中國夥伴關係策略評估與展望。《世界經濟與政治》，2，65–95。 周冠竹，(未定)。誰遙遙領先？權力轉移論與美中科技能力評估。《問題與研究》，即將出版。 茅海建。 (1996)。鴉片戰爭清朝軍費考。《山西財經學院學報》，2，4。 洪世章、許瓊文與何泰宇. (2013). 建構創新系統績效衡量指標.《科技管理學刊》，18(3)，57–91。 重慶日報。 (2019)。重慶為高層次人才提供最高2000萬元‘人才貸’。取自 https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/02/content_5405239.htm。 烏云其其格等。 (2009)。我國高層次科技人才回歸不足現象及原因分析。取自 http://qwgzyj.gqb.gov.cn/yjytt/147/1399.shtml。 烏凌翔（2022）。美中科技戰與權力轉移-熱戰可以被避免嗎?。未出版之士論文，國立台灣大學，台北。 孫學峰, 丁鲁。 (2017)。夥伴國類型與中國夥伴關係升級。《世界經濟與政治》，2，54–76。 清華大學。 (2001)。培養又紅又專的優秀人才—清華大學教育思想集萃。取自 https://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/2030/78977.htm。 張建華。 (2018)。20世紀五六十年代的留蘇學人及其視野中的‘蘇聯形象’。《華僑華人歷史研究》，(1)，52-60。 深圳證券交易所。 (2020)。發行上市條件。取自 https://www.szse.cn/ipo/guide/requirements/index.html。 陳麒安與吳崇涵。 (2022)。南韓在美國與中國之間的避險戰略。《問題與研究》，61(2)，1–49。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.202206_61(2).0001 楊一逵與陳秉逵。(2020)。中共網際權力之初探：以資訊與通訊科技在國際合作中之吸引力為觀察。《中國大陸研究》，63(3)，119–172。DOI: 10.30389/MCS.202009_63(3).0004 領英人才洞察。 (2023)。2022年中國留學生歸國求職洞察報告。取自 https://business.linkedin.com/content/dam/me/business/zh-cn/talent-solutions/Event/2022/Aug/2022-chinese-overseas-student-report.pdf。 鄭子真。 (2023)。 新世紀日本的太空發展：以太空外交和軍民兩用觀點為主。《問題與研究》，62(2)，117–154。DOI: 10.30390/ISC.202306_62(2).0004 劉孟俊。 (2017)。近年中國大陸全球大型併購之趨勢及意涵。《經濟前瞻》，169，56-61。 英文文獻 Academy, E. (2017, August 2). Paid to Publish: The Chinese Cash Cow. Enago Academy. https://www.enago.com/academy/paid-to-publish-the-chinese-cash-cow/ Adeyemi, R. A., Joel, A., Ebenezer, J. T., & Attah, E. Y. (2018). The Effect of Brain Drain on the Economic Development of Developing Countries: Evidence from Selected African Countries. Journal of Health and Social Issues (JOHESI) Vol, 7(2), 66–76. Agarwal, H., & Agarwal, R. (2017). First Industrial Revolution and Second Industrial Revolution: Technological differences and the differences in banking and financing of the firms. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(11), 1062–1066. Agénor, P. (2003). Benefits and Costs of International Financial Integration: Theory and Facts. World Economy, 26(8), 1089–1118. Alexy, O. T., Block, J. H., Sandner, P., & Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2012). Social Capital of Venture Capitalists and Start-up Funding. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9337-4 Alexy, O. T., Block, J. H., Sandner, P., & Wal, A. L. J. T. (2012). Social capital of venture capitalists and start-up funding. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 835–851. Allen, G. C. (2023, July 18). CSIS Translation: Updated Japanese Export Controls on High-Performance Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/csis-translation-updated-japanese-export-controls-high-performance-semiconductor Allison, G., Klyman, K., Barbesino, K., & Yen, H. (2021). The Great Tech Rivalry: China vs the U.S. (Avoiding Great Power War Project Paper Series). Harvard Kennedy School. Allison, G. T., Klyman, K., Barbesino, K., & Yen, H. (2021). The Great Tech Rivalry: China vs the U.S. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Altbach, P. G. (2004). Higher Education Crosses Borders: Can the United States Remain the Top Destination for Foreign Students? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(2), 18–25. American Academy of Arts & Science. (2020). The Perils of Complacency: America at a Tipping Point in Science & Engineering. American Academy of Arts & Science. Aminullah, E. (2015). Learning, R&D Intensity and economic prosperity in low R&D countries (LRDCs): Envisioning the Indonesian future. 15–17. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Furtado, D., & Xu, H. (2019). OPT Policy Changes and Foreign Born STEM Talent in the U.S. Labour Economics, 61, 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101752 Anders, T., Fariss, C. J., & Markowitz, J. N. (2020). Bread Before Guns or Butter: Introducing Surplus Domestic Product (SDP). International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 392–405. Arbix, G. (2019). Innovation Policy in Brazil since 2003: Advances, Incoherencies, and Discontinuities. Innovation in Brazil: Advancing Development in the 21st Century, 3. Arestis, P., & Demetriades, P. (1999). Financial Liberalization: The Experience of Developing Countries. Eastern Economic Journal, 25(4), 441–457. Banco Central do Brasil. (2021). The Real Plan [Banco Central do Brasil]. The Real Plan. https://www.bcb.gov.br/en/monetarypolicy/realplan Barut, A., Citil, M., Ahmed, Z., Sinha, A., & Abbas, S. (2023). How Do Economic and Financial Factors Influence Green Logistics? A Comparative Analysis of E7 and G7 Nations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(1), 1011–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22252-0 Beck, T., Crivelli, J. M., & Summerhill, W. (2005). State Bank Transformation in Brazil – Choices and Consequences. Bank Privatization, 29(8), 2223–2257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.014 Beckley, M. (2018). The Power of Nations: Measuring What Matters. International Security, 43(2), 7–44. Bogdanski, J., Tombini, A. A., & Werlang, S. R. da C. (2000). Implementing Inflation Targeting in Brazil. Werlang, Sergio R., Implementing Inflation Targeting in Brazil (July 2000). Banco Central Do Brasil Working Paper, 1. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Massetti, E., & Tavoni, M. (2008a). International energy R&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization. Technological Change and the Environment, 30(6), 2912–2929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.04.008 Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Massetti, E., & Tavoni, M. (2008b). International Energy R&D Spillovers and the Economics of Greenhouse Gas Atmospheric Stabilization. Technological Change and the Environment, 30(6), 2912–2929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.04.008 Brewer, E., & Genay, H. (1995). Small Business Investment Companies: Financial Characteristics and Investments. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(3), 38. https://proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/small-business-investment-companies-financial/docview/220955663/se-2?accountid=10067 Brewer, E., Genay, H., Jackson, W. E., & Worthington, P. R. (1996). Performance and Access to Government Guarantees: The Case of Small Business Investment Companies. Economic Perspectives, 20, 16–30. Brooks, H. (1994). The Relationship between Science and Technology. Research Policy, 23(5), 477–486. Brunt, L. (2006). Rediscovering Risk: Country Banks as Venture Capital Firms in the First Industrial Revolution. The Journal of Economic History, 66(1), 74–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3875106 Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259. Bu, L. (1999). Educational exchange and cultural diplomacy in the Cold War. Journal of American Studies, 33(3), 393–415. Bwalya, S. M. (2006). Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Spillovers: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis of Manufacturing Firms in Zambia. Journal of Development Economics, 81(2), 514–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.06.011 Cao, C. (2008). China’s Brain Drain at the High End. Asian Population Studies, 4(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730802496532 Carlaw, K. I., & Lipsey, R. G. (2003). Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth: What is the Relationship? Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(3), 457–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00201 Carlson, T. E., & Hayes, J. F. (2005). The Small Business Provisions of the 2005 Bankruptcy Amendments. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 79, 645. Carrillo-Carrillo, F., & Alcalde-Heras, H. (2020). Modes of Innovation in an Emerging Economy: A Firm-level Analysis from Mexico. Innovation, 22(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1735395 Casper, G., & Tufis, C. (2003). Correlation Versus Interchangeability: The Limited Robustness of Empirical Findings on Democracy Using Highly Correlated Data Sets. Political Analysis, 11(2), 196–203. Castaneda, D. I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3), 159–173. Castilla, E. J. (2003). Networks of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(1–2), 113–135. Chan, S. (2005). Is There a Power Transition between the U.S. and China? The Different Faces of National Power. Asian Survey, 45(5), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2005.45.5.687 Chand, M. (2019). Brain Drain, Brain Circulation, and the African Diaspora in the United States. Journal of African Business, 20(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2018.1440461 Chang, P., & Deng, Z. (1992). The Chinese Brain Drain and Policy Options. Studies in Comparative International Development, 27, 44–60. Chiarini, T., Cimini, F., Rapini, M. S., & Silva, L. A. (2020). The Political Economy of Innovation: Why is Brazil Stuck in the Technology Ladder? Brazilian Political Science Review, 14. Chinn, M. D., & Ito, H. (2008). A New Measure of Financial Openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 10(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802231123 Chou, K., & Fu, T. (2024). The Great Tech Race: Quantifying the Unseen Power among Great Powers. APSA 2024 Annual Meeting. APSA 2024 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia. Chung, E. (2022, August 1). U.S. Passes CHIPS Act, Increasing Restrictions on China Lead to Rising Geopolitical Risk, Says Trendforce. TrendForce. https://www.trendforce.com/presscenter/news/20220801-11322.html Clay, I., & Atkinson, R. (2023). Wake Up, America: China Is Overtaking the United States in Innovation Output. Hamilton Center on Industrial Strategy. Colombo, D. G. e, & Cruz, H. N. da. (2023). Impact Assessment of Innovation Tax Incentives in Brazil. Innovation & Management Review, 20(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-11-2020-0167 Corona, J. M., Dutrénit, G., Puchet, M., & Santiago, F. (2014). The Changing Role of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Building Systems of Innovation: The Case of Mexico. In G. Crespi & G. Dutrénit (Eds.), Science, Technology and Innovation Policies for Development: The Latin American Experience (pp. 15–43). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04108-7_2 Cozzens, S. E. (1997). The knowledge pool: Measurement challenges in evaluating fundamental research programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(96)00038-9 Crossa, M., & Ebner, N. (2020). Automotive Global Value Chains in Mexico: A Mirage of Development? Third World Quarterly, 41(7), 1218–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1761252 Da Fonseca, M. A. R. (1998). Brazil’s Real Plan. Journal of Latin American Studies, 30(3), 619–639. Dahlman, C. J. (2007). China and India: Emerging Technological Powers. Issues in Science and Technology, 23(3), 45–53. Daugeliene, R., & Marcinkeviciene, R. (2009). Brain Circulation: Theoretical Considerations. Engineering Economics, 63(3). De Negri, F., & Rauen, A. T. (2018). Innovation Policies in Brazil During the 2000s: The Need for New Paths (235). Institute for Applied Economic Research. de Paula, L. F. (2012). Financial Liberalization and Economic Performance: Brazil at the Crossroads. Routledge. Deeg, R., & Hardie, I. (2016). ‘What Is Patient Capital and Who Supplies It?’ Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww025 Deitz, S., & Freyman, C. (2024). The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2024 (NSB-2024-3). U.S. National Science Foundation. Deloitte. (2021). Law 11,196/05 – “Lei do Bem” Tax Incentive for Technological Innovation [Deloitte]. https://www2.deloitte.com/br/en/pages/tax/solutions/lei-do-bem.html Ding, J. (2023). The Diffusion Deficit in Scientific and Technological Power: Re-assessing China’s Rise. Review of International Political Economy, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2023.2173633 Dobrzański, P., Bobowski, S., Chrysostome, E., Velinov, E., & Strouhal, J. (2021). Toward Innovation-Driven Competitiveness across African Countries: An Analysis of the Efficiency of R&D Expenditures. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(1). Docquier, F., Lohest, O., & Marfouk, A. (2007). Brain Drain in Developing Countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 21(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhm008 Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012). Globalization, Brain Drain, and Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3), 681–730. Dos Santos, M. E. R., & Torkomian, A. L. V. (2013). Technology Transfer and Innovation: The Role of the Brazilian TTOs. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 12(1), 89–111. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S., & León, L. R. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What Is the Future of Innovation-driven Growth? World Intellectual Property Organization. https://doi.org/10.34667/TIND.46596 Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Shapira, P. (2016). Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711856 Engelbrecht, H.-J. (1997). International R&D Spillovers, Human Capital and Productivity in OECD Economies: An Empirical Investigation. European Economic Review, 41(8), 1479–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00046-3 Ernst, C. (2005). The FDI–employment Link in a Globalizing World: The Case of Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Employment Strategy Papers, 17, 1–45. Errunza, V. (2001). Foreign Portfolio Equity Investments, Financial Liberalization, and Economic Development. Review of International Economics, 9(4), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9396.00308 Escobar, H. (2017, October 20). In Brazil, Researchers Struggle to Fend off Deepening Budget Cuts. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/brazil-researchers-struggle-fend-deepening-budget-cuts Eyal-Cohen, M. (2011). Why is Small Business the Chief Business of Congress. Rutgers LJ, 43, 1. Feijo, C., Lamônica, M. T., & Lima, S. S. (2019). Financial Liberalization and Structural Change: The Brazilian Case in the 2000s. Economia e Sociedade, 28, 177–200. Ferrary, M., & Granovetter, M. (2009). The Role of Venture Capital Firms in Silicon Valley’s Complex innovation Network. Economy and Society, 38(2), 326–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140902786827 Forero-Pineda, C., Laureiro-Martinez, D., & Marín, A. (2011). Innovation Patterns and Intellectual Property in SME´s of a Developing Country. Innovar, 21(42). https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/innovation-patterns-intellectual-property-sme´s/docview/1677603398/se-2?accountid=13877 France 24. (2022, March 1). Disillusioned and ’Betrayed’—Brazilians Flock Abroad. France 24. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20220301-disillusioned-and-betrayed-brazilians-flock-abroad Frantzen, D. (2000). R&D, Human Capital and International Technology Spillovers: A Cross-country Analysis. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00184 Fuglie, K. (2018). R&D Capital, R&D Spillovers, and Productivity Growth in World Agriculture. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(3), 421–444. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002a). The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002b). The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4 Gaida, J., Jennifer, W.-L., Stephan, R., & Danielle. (2023). Policy Brief: ASPI’s Critical Technology Tracker: The Global Race for Future Power (69/2023). The Australian Strategic Policy Institute. Garcia, L. R. (2009). European markets as challenges or opportunities for Mexican SMEs internationalization: A critical analysis of globalization. In The Nation in the Global Era (pp. 262–288). Brill. Gardner, J. W. (1951). The Foreign Student in America. Foreign Aff., 30, 637. Geisler, E. (2000). The Metrics of Science and Technology. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. Gibbons, M., & Johnston, R. (1974). The Roles of Science in Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 3(3), 220–242. Gilpin, R. (1988). The Theory of Hegemonic War. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/204816 Gilpin, Robert. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. In War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press. Godin, B. (2009). National Innovation System: The System Approach in Historical Perspective. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34(4), 476–501. Gompers, P. A. (1994). The rise and fall of venture capital. Business and Economic History, 1–26. Government of Brazil. (2024, February 22). Federal Government Budget. Government of Brazil. https://www1.siop.planejamento.gov.br/QvAJAXZfc/opendoc.htm?document=IAS%2FExecucao_Orcamentaria.qvw&host=QVS%40pqlk04&anonymous=true&sheet=SH15 Graham, E. (2024, March 5). Pentagon Official Says US Values Will Outcompete Beijing in AI. Nextgov/FCW. https://www.nextgov.com/artificial-intelligence/2024/03/pentagon-official-says-us-values-will-outcompete-beijing-ai/394700/ Guerrero, M., & Link, A. N. (2022). Public support of innovative activity in small and large firms in Mexico. Small Business Economics, 59(1), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00517-1 Guglielmi, G. (2019). Mexican Science Suffers under Debilitating Budget Cuts. Nature, 572(7769), 294–296. Guo, R., Ning, L., & Chen, K. (2022). How Do Human Capital and R&D Structure Facilitate FDI Knowledge Spillovers to Local Firm Innovation? A Panel Threshold Approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(6), 1921–1947. Haas, P. M. (1989). Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control. International Organization, 43(3), 377–403. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442 Haber, S. (2005). Mexico’s Experiments with Bank Privatization and Liberalization, 1991–2003. Bank Privatization, 29(8), 2325–2353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.017 Hammar, N., & Belarbi, Y. (2021). R&D, Innovation and Productivity Relationships: Evidence from Threshold Panel Model. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 5(3), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2021.06.002 Han, F., & Zhu, L. (2013). Linkage Effects of Trade Openness and Financial Openness on Technological Progress. In E. Qi, J. Shen, & R. Dou (Eds.), Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 139–147). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Han, X., & Appelbaum, R. P. (2018). China’s Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Research Evironment: A Snapshot. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0195347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195347 Herman, A. (2024, May 22). Biden Is Losing the High-Tech War with China. Hudson Institute. https://www.hudson.org/technology/biden-losing-high-tech-war-china-arthur-herman Hiskey, J., Malone, M. F. T., & Diaz-Dominguez, A. (2020). Authoritarian Recall: Mexico’s Drug War and Subnational Patterns of Opposition to Democracy. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 12(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X20913287 Hodgson, G. M. (2021). Financial Institutions and the British Industrial Revolution: Did Financial Underdevelopment Hold Back Growth? Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742000065X Horowitz, M. C. (2018). Artificial intelligence, international competition, and the balance of power (May 2018). Texas National Security Review. Horowitz, M. C. (2020). Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032725 Huang, Y. (2023). The Rise and Fall of the EAST. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300274912 Hudson, J., & Minea, A. (2013). Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights, and Economic Development: A Unified Empirical Investigation. World Development, 46, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.023 Human Right Watch. (2019, March 21). China: Government Threats to Academic Freedom Abroad. Human Right Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/03/21/china-government-threats-academic-freedom-abroad Ighoshemu, B. O., & Ogidiagba, U. B. (2022). Poor Governance and Massive Unemployment in Nigeria: As causes of Brain Drain in the Buhari Administration (2015-2020). Insights into Regional Development, 4(2), 73–84. Inderst, R., & Müller, H. M. (2004). The Effect of Capital Market Characteristics on the Value of Start-up firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(2), 319–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.06.001 International Monetary Fund. (2022). Mexico: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Financial System Stability Assessment (IMF Country Report No. 22/335). International Monetary Fund. International Trade Administration. (2019, October 17). Mexico—E. Automotive Parts and Supplies. International Trade Administration. https://www.export.gov/apex/article2?id=Mexico-Automotive-Parts-and-Supplies James, J., & Romijn, H. (1997a). The Determinants of Technological Capability: A Cross‐country Analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 25(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600819708424129 James, J., & Romijn, H. (1997b). The Determinants of Technological Capability: A Cross‐country Analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 25(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600819708424129 Johnson, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence & future warfare: Implications for international security. Defense & Security Analysis, 35(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2019.1600800 Kennedy, A. B. (2015). Powerhouses or Pretenders? Debating China’s and India’s Emergence as Technological Powers. The Pacific Review, 28(2), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.995126 Kennedy, A. B. (2024). The Process of Paradigm Change: The Rise of Guided Innovation in China. Review of International Political Economy, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2023.2280974 Kessler, T. P. (1998). Political Capital: Mexican Financial Policy under Salinas. World Politics, 51(1), 36–66. Khan, M. K., He, Y., Akram, U., Zulfiqar, S., & Usman, M. (2018). Firms’ Technology Innovation Activity: Does Financial Structure Matter? Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 47(2), 329–353. Khoury, T. A., & Peng, M. W. (2011). Does Institutional Reform of Intellectual Property Rights Lead to More Inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. Languages Special Issue Section, 46(3), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.07.015 Kinoshita, Y. (2000). R&D and Technology Spillovers via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity. Available at SSRN 258194. Klingler-Vidra, R. (2016). When Venture Capital is Patient Capital: Seed Funding as a Source of Patient Capital for High-growth Companies. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww022 Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–645. http://www.jstor.org/stable/155168 Kostoff, R. N. (2008). Comparison of China/USA Science and Technology Performance. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.06.004 Kowaltowski, A. J. (2021). Brazil’s Scientists Face 90% Budget Cut. Nature, 598(7882), 566–566. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02882-z Kuo, L., & Cadell, C. (2024, March 14). Chinese Students, Academics Say They’re Facing Extra Scrutiny Entering U.S. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/14/china-united-states-university-students-border/ Kwok, V., & Leland, H. (1982). An Economic Model of the Brain Drain. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 91–100. Lawan Ngoma, A., & Wana Ismail, N. (2013). The Determinants of Brain Drain in Developing Countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 40(8), 744–754. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-05-2013-0109 Lederman, N. G. (2013). Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Routledge. Lee, J. (2023, November 18). How the ‘Fab 4’ Can Bring Clarity to Semiconductor Supply Chains. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2023/11/how-the-fab-4-can-bring-clarity-to-semiconductor-supply-chains/ Lehrer, M., & Celo, S. (2016a). German family capitalism in the 21st century: Patient capital between bifurcation and symbiosis. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 729–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww023 Lehrer, M., & Celo, S. (2016b). German Family Capitalism in the 21st Century: Patient Capital between Bifurcation and Symbiosis. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4), 729–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww023 Lejour, A., & Nahuis, R. (2005). R&D Spillovers and Growth: Specialization Matters. Review of International Economics, 13(5), 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2005.00545.x Lewallen, J. (2021). Emerging technologies and problem definition uncertainty: The case of cybersecurity. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1035–1052. Liu, Y., Woywode, M., & Xing, Y. (2012). High Technology Start-up Innovation and the Role of Guanxi: An Explorative Study in China from an Institutional Perspective. Prometheus, 30(2), 211–229. Lloyd, M. (2018, November 2). Bolsonaro Poses a Serious Threat to Higher Education. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20181102101957300 Lopez-Acevedo, G., & Tinajero, M. (2010). Mexico: Impact Evaluation of SME Programs Using Panel Firm Data. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5186. López-Martínez, R. E., Medellín, E., Scanlon, A. P., & Solleiro, J. L. (1994). Motivations and Obstacles to University Industry Cooperation (UIC): A Mexican Case. R&D Management, 24(1), 017–030. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00844.x Lundvall, B. (2007). National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863 Lustig, N. (1995). The Mexican Peso Crisis: The Foreseeable and the Surprise. Brookings Institute. Maia, G. (1999). Restructuring the Banking System–the Case of Brazil. BIS Policy Papers, 6, 106–123. Mani, S. (2006). Epistemic communities and informed policy making for promoting innovations: The case of Singapore. Science and Technology Policy for Development, Dialogues at the Interface, 73–87. Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2023). Hegemony and Inequality in Global Science: Problems of the Center-periphery Model. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 31–52. Marques, F. (2011, April). José Israel Vargas: From Crisis to Opportunity. Revista Pesquisa. https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/en/jose-israel-vargas-from-crisis-to-opportunity/ Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment. Centre for International Economic Studies Working Paper, 22. Maskus, K. E., Neumann, R., & Seidel, T. (2012). How National and International Financial Development Affect Industrial R&D. European Economic Review, 56(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.06.002 Matthews, D. (2023, July 18). Germany Moves to Create New Restrictions on Research Cooperation with China. Science|Business. https://sciencebusiness.net/news/dual-use/germany-moves-create-new-restrictions-research-cooperation-china McKnight, J. B., & Muggenburg, R. (1993). Mexico’s New Intellectual Property Regime: Improvements in the Protection of Industrial Property, Copyright, License, and Franchise Rights in Mexico. International Lawyer, 27(1), 27. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The tragedy of great power politics / John J. Mearsheimer, University of Chicago. (Updated edition.). W.W. Norton & Company. Minella, A., de Freitas, P. S., Goldfajn, I., & Muinhos, M. K. (2003). Inflation Targeting in Brazil: Constructing Credibility Under Exchange Rate Volatility. Regional and International Implications of the Financial Instability in Latin America, 22(7), 1015–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2003.09.008 Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2021). Comunidade Brasileira no Exterior – Estatísticas 2020. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. https://www.gov.br/mre/pt-br/assuntos/portal-consular/artigos-variados/comunidade-brasileira-no-exterior-2013-estatisticas-2020 Moed, H. (2002). Measuring China" s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53(3), 281–296. Møller, J., & Skaaning, S.-E. (2011). On the Limited Interchangeability of Rule of Law Measures. European Political Science Review, 3(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000421 Morgenthau, H. (1947). Politics Among Nations (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Musacchio, A. (2012). Mexico’s Financial Crisis of 1994-1995 (Harvard Business School Working Paper). Harvard Business School. National Science Foundation. (2023, January 4). U.S. R&D Increased by $51 Billion in 2020 to $717 Billion; Estimate for 2021 Indicates Further Increase to $792 Billion [National Science Foundation]. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf23320 Nelson, R. R. (1992). National Innovation Systems: A Retrospective on a Study. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(2), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/1.2.347 Nunes, F., & Melo, C. R. (2017). Impeachment, Political Crisis and Democracy in Brazil. Revista de Ciencia Política, 37(2), 281–304. OECD. (2015). The Innovation Imperative: Contributing to Productivity, Growth and Well-Being. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239814-en O’Mara, M. (2012). The Uses of the Foreign Student. Social Science History, 36(4), 583–615. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23361144 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2024). International Trade in Services. OECD. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?fs[0]=Topic%2C1%7CTrade%23TRD%23%7CTrade%20in%20goods%20and%20services%23TRD_GDS%23&pg=0&fc=Topic&bp=true&snb=21&vw=tb&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_BOP%40DF_TIS&df[ag]=OECD.SDD.TPS&df[vs]=1.0&dq=USA.CHN.SH.C..A.USD_EXC.&pd=1996%2C2020&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false Organski, A. F. K. (1958). World Politics (2nd ed.). Alfred A. Knopf. Organski, A. F. K. (1968). World Politics / by A. F. K. Organski. In World politics (2nd ed.). Alfred A. Knopf. Organski, A. F., & Kugler, J. (1980). The War Ledger. University of Chicago Press. Pacheco, C. A. (2019). Institutional Dimensions of Innovation Policy in Brazil. Innovation in Brazil: Advancing Development in the 21st Century, 171–188. Padilla, R., & Fenton Ontañon, R. (2013). Commercial Bank Financing for Micro-enterprises and SMEs in Mexico. Cepal Review. Pelaez, V., INVERNIZZi, N., Fuck, M. P., Bagatolli, C., & Oliveira, M. R. de. (2017). The Volatility of S&T Policy Agenda in Brazil. Revista de Administração Pública, 51, 788–809. Pellegrino, A. (2001). Trends in Latin American Skilled Migration: “Brain Drain” or “Brain Exchange”? International Migration, 39(5), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00174 Pierrakis, Y., & Owen, R. (2022). Startup Ventures and Equity Finance: How do Business Accelerators and Business Angels’ Assess the Human capital of Socio-Environmental Mission Led Entrepreneurs? Innovation, 1–25. Pierrakis, Y., & Owen, R. (2023). Startup ventures and Equity Finance: How Do Business Accelerators and Business Angels’ Assess the Human Capital of Socio-environmental Mission Led Entrepreneurs? Innovation, 25(4), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2022.2029706 Pierrakis, Y., & Saridakis, G. (2019). The Role of Venture Capitalists in the Regional Innovation Ecosystem: A Comparison of Networking Patterns between Private and Publicly Backed Venture Capital Funds. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(3), 850–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9622-8 Pineli, A., & Narula, R. (2023). Industrial Policy Matters: The Co-evolution of Economic Structure, Trade, and FDI in Brazil and Mexico, 2000–2015. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 50(2), 399–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00262-4 Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., & Bennett, S. E. (2017). Venture Capital Investment, Financial Development, and Economic growth: The Case of European Single Market Countries. Venture Capital, 19(4), 313–333. Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., Bennett, S. E., Bahmani, S., & Hall, J. H. (2018). Endogenous Dynamics Between Innovation, Financial Markets, Venture Capital and Economic Growth: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 45, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2018.01.002 Quinn, D., Schindler, M., & Toyoda, A. M. (2011). Assessing Measures of Financial Openness and Integration. IMF Economic Review, 59(3), 488–522. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2011.18 Rafique, M. Z., Li, Y., Larik, A. R., & Monaheng, M. P. (2020). Effects of FDI, Technological Innovation, and Financial Development on CO2 Emissions: An Empirical Study of the BRICS Nations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(19), 23899–23913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08715-2 Ramoniene, L., & Lanskoronskis, M. (2011). Reflection of Higher Education Aspects in the Conception of National Competitiveness. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(1), 124–139. Rauch, C. (2017). Challenging the Power Consensus: GDP, CINC, and Power Transition Theory. Security Studies, 26(4), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1336389 Rezende, S. M. (2010). Brazil: Challenges and Achievements. Issues in Science and Technology, 26(3), 61–68. Rocha, F. (2015). Does Governmental Support to Innovation Have Positive Effect on R&D Investments? Evidence from Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 14(especial), 37–60. Rodrigues, M. (2021). Scientists Reel as Brazilian Government Backtracks on Research Funds. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02886-9 Romer, P. M. (1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138148 Samsung Newsroom. (2024, April 15). Samsung Electronics to Receive up to $6.4 Billion in Direct Funding under the CHIPS and Science Act. Samsung Newsroom U.S. https://news.samsung.com/us/samsung-electronics-to-receive-up-to-6-4-billion-in-direct-funding-under-the-chips-and-science-act Saravia, N. G., & Miranda, J. F. (2004). Plumbing the Brain Drain. World Health Organization. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(8), 608–615. Saxenian, A. (2002a). The Silicon Valley Connection: Transnational Networks and Regional Development in Taiwan, China and India. Science, Technology and Society, 7(1), 117–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180200700106 Saxenian, A. (2002b). Transnational Communities and the Evolution of Global Production Networks: The Cases of Taiwan, China and India. Industry and Innovation, 9(3), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271022000034453 Saxenian, A. (2005). From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686293 Schmid, J. (2023, August 16). Rethinking Who’s Winning the U.S.-China Tech Competition. Rand Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/08/rethinking-whos-winning-the-us-china-tech-competition.html Schumpeter, J. Alois. (1983). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. In The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Books. Serajuddin, U., & Hamadeh, N. (2020, July 1). New World Bank Country Classifications by Income Level: 2020-2021. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/opendata/new-world-bank-country-classifications-income-level-2020-2021 Shao, Y., & Sun, L. (2021). Entrepreneurs’ Social Capital and Venture Capital Financing. Journal of Business Research, 136, 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.005 Singh, J., & Krishna, V. V. (2015). Trends in Brain Drain, Gain and Circulation: Indian Experience of Knowledge Workers. Science, Technology and Society, 20(3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721815597132 Sobreira, R., & de Paula, L. F. (2010). The 2008 Financial Crisis and Banking Behavior in Brazil: The Role of the Prudential Regulation. Journal of Innovation Economics, 2, 77–93. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513 Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Capital Market Liberalization, Economic Growth, and Instability. World Development, 28(6), 1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00006-1 Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalization and growth in emerging markets and the new economy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25(5), 505–524. Strüver, G. (2016). What Friends Are Made of: Bilateral Linkages and Domestic Drivers of Foreign Policy Alignment with China. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(2), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12050 Sulisworo, D. (2016). The Contribution of the Education System Quality to Improve the Nation’s Competitiveness of Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 10(2), 127–138. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. (2024, April 8). TSMC Arizona and U.S. Department of Commerce Announce up to US$6.6 Billion in Proposed CHIPS Act Direct Funding, the Company Plans Third Leading-Edge Fab in Phoenix. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited. https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/3122 Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does Higher Economic and Financial Development Lead to Environmental Degradation? Evidence from the BRIC Countries. Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025 Tharenou, P., & Seet, P.-S. (2014). China’s Reverse Brain Drain. International Studies of Management & Organization, 44(2), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825440203 The Observatory of Economic Complexity. (2023). China and United States Trade. The Observatory of Economic Complexity. https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/chn/partner/usa?depthBalanceProductSelector=HS4Depth The US Department of Energy. (2022, December 22). The Life of Enrico Fermi. The US Department of Energy. https://science.osti.gov/fermi/The-Life-of-Enrico-Fermi The World Bank. (2022, September 16). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators The World Bank. (2023a). Central Government debt, total (% of GDP)—Brazil. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org The World Bank. (2023b). External Debt Stocks (% of GNI)—Brazil. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org The World Bank. (2023c). Gross Savings (% of GNI)—Brazil, Mexico, Upper Middle Income. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org The World Bank. (2023d, September 19). Government Expenditure on Education, Total (% of GDP). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.XPD.TOTL.GD.ZS The World Bank. (2023e, November 27). Researchers in R&D (per million people)—Brazil, Latin America & Caribbean. The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org The World Bank. (2024a). Charges for the Use of Intellectual Property, Receipts (BoP, current US$). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.GSR.ROYL.CD The World Bank. (2024b). GDP (constant 2015$). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD Tipalti. (2020, October). Unicorn Hunting. Tipalti. https://tipalti.com/unicorn-hunting/ Torres Filho, E., Macahyba, L., & Zeidan, R. M. (2014). Restructuring Brazil’s National Financial System (IRIBA Working Paper: 06). International Research Initiative on Brazil and Africa (IRIBA). Transparancy Interantional. (2021, January 28). 2020 Corruption Perceptions Index – Brazil. Transparency.Org. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020 Tung, R. L. (2008). Brain Circulation, Diaspora, and International Competitiveness. European Management Journal, 26(5), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.03.005 Tung, R. L., & Lazarova, M. (2006). Brain Drain versus Brain Gain: An Exploratory Study of Ex-host Country Nationals in Central and East Europe. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(11), 1853–1872. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190600999992 UN Comtrade. (2024). UN Comtrade. https://comtradeplus.un.org/TradeFlow United Nations Developement Programme. (2024). Human Development Report 2023/2024 (E.24.III.B.2). United Nations Developement Programme. United States Department of State. (2024, May 23). U.S.-Germany Joint Committee Meeting Deepens Science and Technology Cooperation. United States Department of State. https://www.state.gov/u-s-germany-joint-committee-meeting-deepens-science-and-technology-cooperation/ U.S. Immigration and Costoms Enforcement. (2022). 2007 to 2021 Annual Growth in OPT, STEM OPT and CPT Authorizations and Employment Authorization Document (EAD) Issuances. U.S. Immigration and Costoms Enforcement. https://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/pdf/2007-22_OPTGrowth.pdf Vaccaro, A. (2023). Measures of State Capacity: So Similar, yet so Different. Quality & Quantity, 57(3), 2281–2302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01466-x Villasana, M. (2011). Fostering University-industry Interactions under a Triple Helix Model: The Case of Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 38(1), 43–53. Waltz, K. (1979). Theories of International Politics. Waveland Pr Inc. Waltz, K. (1993). The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security, 18(2), 44–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539097 Weiner, G. (1998). Scholarship, Disciplinary Hegemony and Power in Academic Publishing. 20, 2005. Wen, Y., Qiao, L., & Xi, W. (2018, March 27). China Boosts Ideological Monitoring of Overseas Chinese, Returnees. Radio Free Asia. https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/monitoring-03272018113611.html Williams, B. K. (2023). The Innovation Race: US-China Science and Technology Competition and the Quantum Revolution. Wilson Center. Williamson, J. G. (1984). Why Was British Growth So Slow During the Industrial Revolution? The Journal of Economic History, 44(3), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700032320 Wionczek, M. S. (1981). On the Viability of a Policy for Science and Technology in Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 16(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100028090 Wu, L., Zhu, H., Chen, H., & Roco, M. C. (2019). Comparing Nanotechnology Landscapes in the US and China: A Patent Analysis Perspective. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 21(8), 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4608-0 XE.com. (2024, April 19). Brazilian Real to US Dollar Exchange Rate Chart. XE.Com. https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=BRL&to=USD&view=10Y Yang, L., & Maskus, K. E. (2009). Intellectual Property Rights, Technology Transfer and Exports in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.11.003 Zhai, K., Gao, X., & Wang, G. (2019). Factors for Chinese Students Choosing Australian Higher Education and Motivation for Returning: A Systematic Review. SAGE Open, 9(2), 2158244019850263. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019850263 Zhang, M. Y. (2023, April 21). Chinese Tech Dominance More Myth than Reality. East Asia Forum. https://eastasiaforum.org/2023/04/21/chinese-tech-dominance-more-myth-than-reality/ Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Emergence of China as a Leading Nation in Science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006 Zider, B. (1998, November 1). How Venture Capital Works. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1998/11/how-venture-capital-works Zimmerman, J. (2010). Corporate Entrepreneurship at GE and Intel. Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS), 6(5). zh_TW
