| dc.contributor.advisor | 李文傑<br>李浩仲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lee, Wen-Chieh<br>Li, Hao-Chung | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 呂晨菡 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lu, Chen-Han | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 呂晨菡 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lu, Chen-Han | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2024 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 4-Oct-2024 10:33:29 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 4-Oct-2024 10:33:29 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 4-Oct-2024 10:33:29 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0110258016 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153900 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 經濟學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 110258016 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文想要探討的主要問題為將碳排量成本納入貿易的考量範疇之後，所造成的影響有多大。先將原本取得的各國製造業的碳排量乘上碳定價，就能夠取得碳排成本，之後將各國碳排成本除以附加價值，就能得到碳排成本佔附加價值比，以該結果就能大約推斷碳排成本對貿易影響程度。以上述方法進行，最終本文的研究結果是中國製造業不論在碳排量、附加價值或是碳排成本佔附加價值比都比較高，其次是美國，最後法國、西班牙、墨西哥劃分為一個階層。在本文討論的國中，中國在這部分是需要優先改進的國家。最後本文最主要貢獻的部分是，試著將環境納入國際貿易的新興考量因素，以往的考量因素主要以人力、資本為主，想看看環境相關因素會不會變成新的考量因素，而本文以碳排成本最為例子，看其對附加價值的影響程度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The main question this article wants to explore is the impact of incorporating the cost of carbon emissions into trade considerations. First, multiply the original carbon emissions of each country's manufacturing industry by the carbon price to obtain the carbon emission cost. Then divide the carbon emission cost of each country by the value-added to obtain the ratio of carbon emission cost to value-added. This result is the degree of impact of carbon emissions costs on trade can be roughly inferred. Using the above method, the final research result of this article is that China's manufacturing industry is relatively high in terms of carbon emissions, value-added, or the ratio of carbon emissions costs to value-added, followed by the United States, and finally France, Spain, and Mexico are divided into one class. Among the countries discussed in this article, China is the country that needs priority improvement in this part. Finally, the main contribution of this article is to try to incorporate environment into emerging considerations in international trade. In the past, the considerations were mainly human resources and capital. I want to see if environmental-related factors will become new considerations, and this article takes carbon emission cost as an example to see its impact on value-added. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 圖次 4
第一章 緒論 5
第一節 研究背景 5
第二節 研究目的 6
第三節 研究架構 6
第二章 文獻回顧 7
第一節 環境相關國際公約與政策 7
第二節 從附加價值衡量國際貿易競爭力 8
第三節 相關數據的來源 9
第三章 研究方法 11
第四章 研究結果 13
第一節 各國製造業碳排量與碳排成本 13
第二節 各國製造業的附加價值 15
第三節 各國製造業的碳排成本對附加價值的影響 16
第五章 延伸與建議 21
第一節 延伸討論 21
第二節 研究限制與建議 23
第六章 結論 25
參考文獻 29 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 709215 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110258016 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 碳排成本 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 附加價值貿易 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Carbon emissions cost | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Value-added trade | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 碳排成本與附加價值貿易 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Carbon Emission Cost and Value-added Trade | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭青憶，(1998, April 1). 京都議定書. 天下雜誌. https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5107995
易淳敏，(2023, October 30). COP28「全球盤點」是什麼？為何看懂《巴黎協定》很重要？. ESG遠見. https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/36129
何晨瑋，(2023, March 29). 一文搞懂什麼是CBAM碳邊境調整機制？10月上路！. ESG遠見. https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/5120
蘇巧慧，(2023, May 4). 台灣明年開始課徵「碳費」！企業淨零碳排怎麼做？從日本、韓國，新加坡經驗探詢做法. 永續台灣ESG今周刊. https://esg.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/180687/post/202305040007
Judy chao，(2023, March 30). 2024年台灣碳費應該收多少才合理？. InfoLink. https://www.infolink-group.com/energy-article/tw/topic-how-much-taiwan-should-price-carbon-credits-for-2024
張薰云，(2024, January 17). 碳費徵收懶人包》首波徵收對象有誰？如何計算、何時繳費？. 商周. https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/carbon-reduction/blog/3014396
Timmer, M. P., B., Los, R., Stehrer& Vries, G. j. de. Vries (2013). Fragmentation, Incomes and Jobs: An Analysis of European Competitiveness. Economic Policy, 28(76), 613–661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12018
Robert koopman, Zhi wang, & Shang-jin wei (2014). Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports. The American Economic Review, 104(2), 459–494. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42920705
Alessandro borin, & Michele mancini (2023). Measuring What Matters in Value-Added Trade. Economic Systems Research, 35(4), 586–613. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2022.2153221
Hannah ritchie, Pablo rosado, & Max roser. (2020). Breakdown of Carbon Dioxide, Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions by Sector. Our World In Data.org. https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector
Hannah ritchie, Pablo rosado, & Max roser. (2023). Data Page: Carbon Intensity: CO₂ Emissions per Dollar of GDP. Our World In Data. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co2-intensity
Max roser, Pablo arriagada, Joe hasell, Hannah ritchie, & Esteban ortiz-ospina. (2023). Data Page: GDP per Capita. Our World In Data. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison
IEA (2023), Energy Statistics Data Browser, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/energy-statistics-data-browser
TiVA 2023 Ed. Principal Indicators. (2023, November). OECD.Stat. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=106160 | zh_TW |
