Publications-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 後全球化時代美中新威權主義治理之比較:民粹式威權與專制式威權的國際政治經濟學分析
Analyzing the Development of New Authoritarian governance of US and China in Post Globalization era: Populist authoritarianism vs. Autocratic Authoritarianism through International Political Economy Perspectives
作者 倪周華
Ni, Chou-Hwa
貢獻者 國際關係學報
關鍵詞 新葛蘭西學派; 國際政治經濟; 專制威權治理; 民粹威權治理; 國家形式
Neo-Gramscian; International Political Economy; Autocratic Authoritarian Governance; Populist Authoritarian Governance; Form of State
日期 2023-06
上傳時間 4-Feb-2025 15:50:59 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以國際政治經濟學新葛蘭西學派的霸權性世界秩序之觀點,將國家治理的變化發展置於全球政治經濟架構分析,探求不同政體國家在治理發展形成的動態原因,並聚焦於21世紀國際政治經濟秩序的轉變與國家形式發展之相互辯證關係。首先將簡短回顧近30年全球新自由主義的世界秩序變化關係,以2008年華爾街金融風暴為全球生產秩序變革的分水嶺,說明霸權性生產秩序重組與國家治理變化之結構性關係,並詮釋21世紀威權治理在民主與非民主政體的普遍性興起,係反映國家內外分裂與對立的共通治理困境。其次,本文以國際政治經濟批判學派之觀點,以全球政治經濟危機下生產關係斷裂與社會力量重組的概念,檢視霸權美國民粹威權治理發展及強權中國專制威權發展。本文主張,中國集中式領導與偏向高度社會控制的專制治理與美國自由選舉的民主治理,其看似矛盾的政治政體,然將之置於國際政經結構變化下分析,二強實則有共同政治治理趨勢,即全球生產秩序在變動之際,前階段獨尊市場之新自由主義秩序業轉變,國家間對抗緊張關係升高,對外反映在貿易經濟保護主義與軍事安全對立,對內增加排外性分化與社會控制強化。本文結論係提出國際政治經濟的秩序正處於失序狀態,是造成民主政體與非民主政體普遍興起威權治理的結構性因素。
This study uses the neo-Gramscian the hegemonic world order in international political economy to interpret the development of state governances with the focus on the mutual dialectical relationship between the transformation of the world political economic structure in the 21st century. Firstly, we briefly review the relationship between the changing world order of neoliberalism in the last 30 years and take the 2008 Wall Street financial turmoil as a watershed in the transformation of the globalized order to illustrate the relationship between the restructuring of the hegemonic production order and the state governance dilemma, especially the universal rise of new authoritarianism in democratic and non-democratic regimes in the 21st century. The common denominator of this governance dilemma is not the division and opposition of camps, but the process of social power change through the rupture and restructuring of production relations. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the structural changes in the development of populist neo-authoritarianism in the United States who is the main country supported the hegemonic order and then analyzes the correlation between the rise of a powerful China and the changes in the world order. The interaction between China's centralized leadership and its preference for a high degree of social control and the failure of U.S. electoral democracy will be used to illustrate the change in the global production order and the transformation of the former neoliberal order of exclusive market dominance, as well as the rise of confrontational political and economic relations between countries, reflecting the international political, economic, and military conflicts under protectionism externally and the increase of exclusive social control internally, resulting in the rise of neo-authoritarianism. In the concluding section, we will analyze the possible development and conflicts between democracies and non-democracies in national governance under the global political and economic order regarding the three areas of conflict of social forces, such as globalization consciousness, production patterns, and organizational behavior.
關聯 國際關係學報, 55, 1-24
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.30413/TJIR.202306_(55).0001
dc.contributor 國際關係學報-
dc.creator (作者) 倪周華-
dc.creator (作者) Ni, Chou-Hwa-
dc.date (日期) 2023-06-
dc.date.accessioned 4-Feb-2025 15:50:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 4-Feb-2025 15:50:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Feb-2025 15:50:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/155466-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以國際政治經濟學新葛蘭西學派的霸權性世界秩序之觀點,將國家治理的變化發展置於全球政治經濟架構分析,探求不同政體國家在治理發展形成的動態原因,並聚焦於21世紀國際政治經濟秩序的轉變與國家形式發展之相互辯證關係。首先將簡短回顧近30年全球新自由主義的世界秩序變化關係,以2008年華爾街金融風暴為全球生產秩序變革的分水嶺,說明霸權性生產秩序重組與國家治理變化之結構性關係,並詮釋21世紀威權治理在民主與非民主政體的普遍性興起,係反映國家內外分裂與對立的共通治理困境。其次,本文以國際政治經濟批判學派之觀點,以全球政治經濟危機下生產關係斷裂與社會力量重組的概念,檢視霸權美國民粹威權治理發展及強權中國專制威權發展。本文主張,中國集中式領導與偏向高度社會控制的專制治理與美國自由選舉的民主治理,其看似矛盾的政治政體,然將之置於國際政經結構變化下分析,二強實則有共同政治治理趨勢,即全球生產秩序在變動之際,前階段獨尊市場之新自由主義秩序業轉變,國家間對抗緊張關係升高,對外反映在貿易經濟保護主義與軍事安全對立,對內增加排外性分化與社會控制強化。本文結論係提出國際政治經濟的秩序正處於失序狀態,是造成民主政體與非民主政體普遍興起威權治理的結構性因素。-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study uses the neo-Gramscian the hegemonic world order in international political economy to interpret the development of state governances with the focus on the mutual dialectical relationship between the transformation of the world political economic structure in the 21st century. Firstly, we briefly review the relationship between the changing world order of neoliberalism in the last 30 years and take the 2008 Wall Street financial turmoil as a watershed in the transformation of the globalized order to illustrate the relationship between the restructuring of the hegemonic production order and the state governance dilemma, especially the universal rise of new authoritarianism in democratic and non-democratic regimes in the 21st century. The common denominator of this governance dilemma is not the division and opposition of camps, but the process of social power change through the rupture and restructuring of production relations. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the structural changes in the development of populist neo-authoritarianism in the United States who is the main country supported the hegemonic order and then analyzes the correlation between the rise of a powerful China and the changes in the world order. The interaction between China's centralized leadership and its preference for a high degree of social control and the failure of U.S. electoral democracy will be used to illustrate the change in the global production order and the transformation of the former neoliberal order of exclusive market dominance, as well as the rise of confrontational political and economic relations between countries, reflecting the international political, economic, and military conflicts under protectionism externally and the increase of exclusive social control internally, resulting in the rise of neo-authoritarianism. In the concluding section, we will analyze the possible development and conflicts between democracies and non-democracies in national governance under the global political and economic order regarding the three areas of conflict of social forces, such as globalization consciousness, production patterns, and organizational behavior.-
dc.format.extent 1266356 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 國際關係學報, 55, 1-24-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新葛蘭西學派; 國際政治經濟; 專制威權治理; 民粹威權治理; 國家形式-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Neo-Gramscian; International Political Economy; Autocratic Authoritarian Governance; Populist Authoritarian Governance; Form of State-
dc.title (題名) 後全球化時代美中新威權主義治理之比較:民粹式威權與專制式威權的國際政治經濟學分析-
dc.title (題名) Analyzing the Development of New Authoritarian governance of US and China in Post Globalization era: Populist authoritarianism vs. Autocratic Authoritarianism through International Political Economy Perspectives-
dc.type (資料類型) article-
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.30413/TJIR.202306_(55).0001-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.30413/TJIR.202306_(55).0001-