| dc.contributor | 斯拉夫文系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林蒔慧 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lin, Melissa Shih-hui;Šebesta, Karel | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2025-04 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 27-May-2025 11:04:27 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 27-May-2025 11:04:27 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 27-May-2025 11:04:27 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=176607 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This study aims to explore (a) the structural differences between Czech and Chinese in expressing motion events;and (b) how these differences manifest in the interlanguage of Chinese students learning Czech;specifically focusing on the types of non-standard constructions (hereafter referred to as NsC) that appear in their Czech sentences expressing motion events. The theoretical framework is based on the post-Talmy model of conceptualization motion events;which focuses on the variability of constructions used to express motion events and their different structural characteristics. The study uses a methodological approach involving the collection of narratives data prompted by the picture book Frog;Where are you? (Meyer;1969) and its subsequent analysis. A comparison of Czech and Chinese revealed two main differences in expressing motion events: (a) Czech constructions often use verb prefixes to convey motion;a feature absent in Chinese;and (b) Chinese constructions typically employs particles and;to some extent;serial verbs in equivalent constructions. These differneces led to two expectations regarding the NsC observed in expressing motion events in the interlanguage of Chinese speakers: (a) NsC related to prefixes would be the most prevalent;and (b) NsC related to prefixes differ from those involving other devices in that prefixes would primarily be associated with omissions (an avoidance strategy);while other devices would mainly show confusion. The analysis confirmed both expectations: (a) Prefixes are involved in more than half of the observed NsC;while NsC related to other devices (such as prepositions and cases) are significantly fewer. The non-standardness of constructions using prefixes is also higher;with a rate of 34% for prefixes;compared to 17% for prepositions and cases. (b) The second expectation was confirmed even more strongly;with omissions accounting for 89% of NsC;related to prefixes;while no omissions are found in constructions involving other devices. | |
| dc.format.extent | 177 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 슬라브어 연구 (Journal of Slavic Languages), Vol.30, No.1, pp.102-131 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Motion events; Post-Talmy semantic typology; Verbal prefix; Czech; Chinese | |
| dc.title (題名) | DRÁHA, REGION a SMĚR v češtině čínských studentů | |
| dc.title (題名) | PATH, REGION and DIRECTION in Chinese students' Czech | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.30530/JSL.2025.30.1.102 | |
| dc.doi.uri (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.30530/JSL.2025.30.1.102 | |
