Publications-NSC Projects

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 可再生能源政策的制定與實行之政經分析:以中國大陸、日本、韓國為例的跨國比較
The Political Economy of the Renewable Policy: the Cases of China, Japan, and Korea, and a Cross-Country Comparison
作者 蔡中民
貢獻者 政治系
關鍵詞 可再生能源; 經濟決策; 產業政策; 制度變遷; 跨國比較
renewable energy; economic policy-making; industrial policy; institutional transition; cross-country comparison
日期 2020-02
上傳時間 2025-06-19
摘要 充足而穩定的電力供給對中國大陸、日本及韓國來說非常重要,尤其是近年來經濟成長放緩,社會對核電安全仍有疑慮,環境汙染加劇的情況下,發展可再生能源成了三國政府努力推進的目標。然綜觀過去十五年的經驗,中國大陸的空汙問題並未改善,日本的化石能源使用比例持續上升,韓國的可再生能源比例極低,顯然政策效果十分有限。即便是2011年的日本福島核災,都未能成為加速推動可再生能源的契機。矛盾的是,三國政府紛紛提出更為遠大的目標,預計在2030年時可再生能源的比例將大幅成長。準此,本研究旨在回答實證經驗所反映出一個重要的理論性問題:「為什麼可再生能源政策的效果如此有限?」並以新制度主義中制度變遷的解釋途徑分析三國的經濟決策體制,本研究援用新制度主義經濟學,以官僚自主、政商關係、社會反饋作為三個獨立的自變項,探討可再生能源政策之決策與執行為依變項,提出深入的解析。本研究的發現將在個案國家的基礎上,進行跨國之比較,探索「政經體制與經濟決策之間的關係」,以中日韓三國個案的深入探討與交叉研究,本計畫將可以釐清在不同政經體制中,官僚、企業與社會之間的互動是最終是如何地決定了產業政策的制定與實行並呈現一定程度的相似性。
Sufficient and reliable energy supply to generate electricity is vital for the economic development in China, Japan, and Korea. With lower economic growth, deteriorated environment, and suspicion on nuclear safety, the development of renewable energy has become the most important issue for these three countries. Nonetheless, having promoted their own renewable energy plans for 15 years, each country remains to suffer. Air pollution in China is getting worse. Japan has consumed more fossil energy. The renewable energy only occupies 2% in Korea’s electricity genertion. Contradictorily, these three countries still set a high goal for 2030, which is very difficult to achieve. Against this background, this project aims to answer a critical theoretical question derived from the empirical evidence that “why has the policy outcome of renewable policies so limited in these three countries?” The three independent variables are state-business relationship, social response, and bureaucratic autonomy, and the dependent variable is policy decision and implementation. This project will further conduct comparative studies among the three cases to explore the question that “have the political-economic regime decided economic policy-making mechanism?” This project analyzes the political-economic logic of renewable policies in China, Japan, and Korea, and demonstrates that the policy decision and implementation may go beyond the difference of political-economic regime.
關聯 科技部, MOST107-2410-H004-146, 107.08-108.07
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 政治系
dc.creator (作者) 蔡中民
dc.date (日期) 2020-02
dc.date.accessioned 2025-06-19-
dc.date.available 2025-06-19-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2025-06-19-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157414-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 充足而穩定的電力供給對中國大陸、日本及韓國來說非常重要,尤其是近年來經濟成長放緩,社會對核電安全仍有疑慮,環境汙染加劇的情況下,發展可再生能源成了三國政府努力推進的目標。然綜觀過去十五年的經驗,中國大陸的空汙問題並未改善,日本的化石能源使用比例持續上升,韓國的可再生能源比例極低,顯然政策效果十分有限。即便是2011年的日本福島核災,都未能成為加速推動可再生能源的契機。矛盾的是,三國政府紛紛提出更為遠大的目標,預計在2030年時可再生能源的比例將大幅成長。準此,本研究旨在回答實證經驗所反映出一個重要的理論性問題:「為什麼可再生能源政策的效果如此有限?」並以新制度主義中制度變遷的解釋途徑分析三國的經濟決策體制,本研究援用新制度主義經濟學,以官僚自主、政商關係、社會反饋作為三個獨立的自變項,探討可再生能源政策之決策與執行為依變項,提出深入的解析。本研究的發現將在個案國家的基礎上,進行跨國之比較,探索「政經體制與經濟決策之間的關係」,以中日韓三國個案的深入探討與交叉研究,本計畫將可以釐清在不同政經體制中,官僚、企業與社會之間的互動是最終是如何地決定了產業政策的制定與實行並呈現一定程度的相似性。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Sufficient and reliable energy supply to generate electricity is vital for the economic development in China, Japan, and Korea. With lower economic growth, deteriorated environment, and suspicion on nuclear safety, the development of renewable energy has become the most important issue for these three countries. Nonetheless, having promoted their own renewable energy plans for 15 years, each country remains to suffer. Air pollution in China is getting worse. Japan has consumed more fossil energy. The renewable energy only occupies 2% in Korea’s electricity genertion. Contradictorily, these three countries still set a high goal for 2030, which is very difficult to achieve. Against this background, this project aims to answer a critical theoretical question derived from the empirical evidence that “why has the policy outcome of renewable policies so limited in these three countries?” The three independent variables are state-business relationship, social response, and bureaucratic autonomy, and the dependent variable is policy decision and implementation. This project will further conduct comparative studies among the three cases to explore the question that “have the political-economic regime decided economic policy-making mechanism?” This project analyzes the political-economic logic of renewable policies in China, Japan, and Korea, and demonstrates that the policy decision and implementation may go beyond the difference of political-economic regime.
dc.format.extent 116 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 科技部, MOST107-2410-H004-146, 107.08-108.07
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 可再生能源; 經濟決策; 產業政策; 制度變遷; 跨國比較
dc.subject (關鍵詞) renewable energy; economic policy-making; industrial policy; institutional transition; cross-country comparison
dc.title (題名) 可再生能源政策的制定與實行之政經分析:以中國大陸、日本、韓國為例的跨國比較
dc.title (題名) The Political Economy of the Renewable Policy: the Cases of China, Japan, and Korea, and a Cross-Country Comparison
dc.type (資料類型) report