| dc.contributor | 政治系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 葉浩 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2018-04 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-19 | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 2025-06-19 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157418 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 伯林與鄂蘭是兩位二十世紀公認的重要政治思想家，皆來自於猶太背景，並以探索極權主義的起源為學術的主要關懷，且各自提出了多元主義理論作為回應。然而，截至目前為止，尚未有關於兩人思想的比較研究。本研究計畫以伯林與鄂蘭關於艾希曼耶路撒冷大審的爭議為線索，循路釐清兩人對此案件的不同判斷與他們各自對於極權主義的理解之關係，並試圖截長補短，藉此重建一個關於此一議題的完整理解。以此為基礎，本研究計畫將進一步探索兩者的多元主義基礎，一方面凸顯他們所共享的形上學預設，一方面嘗試整合兩者在方法論洞見與政治想像，並以此對照與批判羅爾斯試圖解決價值多元的策略。隨後，本研究將以轉型正義議題來檢視整合後的理論是否完善，首先將伯林、鄂蘭與羅爾斯三人的理論理解為「悲劇衝突的肯認」、「原諒與承諾」以及「反思平衡」三種讓人與他人及社會和解的策略，再進一步分析三種策略的各自優缺以及互補可能性，最後提出一個鑲嵌於「希望政治」之內的和解理論。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Isaiah Berlin and Hannah Arendt are widely regarded as two great twentieth-century political
thinkers, who, both of Jewish background, made their debut into academia by trying to trace the
origins of totalitarianism and each proposed a theory of pluralism. However, a serious comparison
between their political thoughts is yet to be made.
This research proposes to address this issue by taking the disputes between Berlin and Arendt over
the trial of Adolf Eichman in Jerusalem as a clue to unraveling their different understanding of the
event and the attendant seemingly irreconcilable judgments. And the goal is to arrive at a fuller
grasp of totalitarianism by way of a reconstruction of their hidden dialogues. With this in place, it
will go on to analyse the metaphysical foundations of their pluralism, and special efforts will be
made to reconcile both thinkers’ methodological insights and visions of politics.
The result will be a theory of reconciliation embedded in a politics of hope. First of all, Berlin,
Arendt, and Rawls will be understood to be proposing different strategies to reconcile oneself with
the society, that is, “recognizing the tragic nature of conflicts”, “forgiving and promising”, and
“reflective equilibrium” respectively. Secondly, it will be argued that Rawls’ strategy cannot do the
work needed by a divided society. And finally, the insights and strategies found in Berlin and
Arendt will be combined into a theory of political hope that could really meets such demands. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST105-2410-H004-030, 105.08-106.07 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 伯林; 鄂蘭; 隱匿對話; 多元主義; 政治和解; 希望政治 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Isaiah Berlin; Hannah Arendt; hidden dialogue; pluralism; political reconciliation; politics of hope | |
| dc.title (題名) | 伯林與鄂蘭的隱匿對話——邁向一個政治和解的理論 | |
| dc.title (題名) | The Hidden Dialogue between Isaiah Berlin and Hannah Arendt - towards a Theory of Political Reconciliation | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
