| dc.contributor | 社會系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 高國魁 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2017-10 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 20-Jun-2025 13:08:11 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 20-Jun-2025 13:08:11 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 20-Jun-2025 13:08:11 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157464 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本計畫著重問題意識的鋪陳，旨在強調雖然當代社會學家偏好採取個體行動翻轉社會結構的觀點，從而發現日常生活挑戰功能系統的現實；可與此同時，他們也更深墜入人類行動至上的現代性偏好中。遲自1980年代起，這種後帕森思的理論徵候全面發酵在所謂親密關係的社會學研究中，使得行動社會學和愛情社會學之間存在著理論方法和經驗現象相互印證的共謀關係。本文首先論證第二現代性學者公認反思性愛情的社會行動，然後釐清魯曼論反身性愛情的非語言溝通所內涵的獨特性。然後，我們會返回帕森思再思愛情宗教的秩序問題，透過語言人、身體人和情感人三大分析面向，設計生活政治、生物政治和生命政治的計畫內容。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This proposal aims to point out that contemporary sociologists prefer to overturn the perspective of social structure with that of individual action, discovering in consequence the challenges of daily life poses toward functional systems. However, they plunge deeper into the supremacy of human action which is a typical modernist bias. Since the 1980s, this post-Parsonian symptom has taken over the sociological study of intimacy by allowing the theoretical sociology of action and the empirical sociology of love enter into a collusive relation. This proposal will first argue that scholars of second modernity acknowledge social action of reflexive love, and then clarify that Luhmann’s reflexive love has a unique significance of stressing non-linguisitc communication. In the end, we will return to Parson’s reflection on the religious order of love. We will design a tripartite analytic of life politics and biopolitics based on the liniguistic, bodily and affective conception of man. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST105-2410-H004-098, 105.08-106.07 | |
| dc.title (題名) | 愛情的生命政治 | |
| dc.title (題名) | The Bio-Politics of Love | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
