Publications-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 近世「儒」的論說與變遷――知識的典範轉移
Shifting Discourses on “Ru” in Modern China: A Paradigm Shift
作者 鄭吉雄
Cheng, Dennis K. H.
貢獻者 政大中文學報
關鍵詞 儒; 儒林; 理學; 明末清初; 典範轉移
Ruism; philosophy; philology; late Imperial China; paradigm shift
日期 2025-06
上傳時間 30-Jun-2025 09:06:25 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文論近世「儒」的論說與變遷,從蒙元修撰《宋史》、滿清修撰《明史》皆於「儒林傳」外另立「道學」或「理學傳」談起,檢討諸儒的言論,以見明清儒學典範轉移的關鍵。筆者揭示「儒林」一詞,認為歷史上「儒」為一群體形成之社會階層,與時代升降相為表裡,故「儒」的身分設定,取決於群體自覺,以及群儒的治學內容。明末儒學衰微,肇因於儒者耽於「理」的討論導致知識嚴重貧乏,由此而引起儒者掀起的知識多元化運動,從文章、經史、經世等各類知識充實儒學,進而奠立清代儒學的基調。明清儒學典範性轉化,實受惠於晚明儒學衰微的刺激。故清代多元而充實的儒學開花結果,實得力於晚明儒學的花落腐土,化為春泥。
Beginning from discussing the separation of lixue (理學) and daoxue (道學) from rulin zhuan (儒林傳) in Chinese dynastic histories, this paper discusses the shifting discourses on “Ru” in late imperial China and attempts to reexamine existing scholarship by revealing the key factors leading to the paradigm shift of Ruism in late imperial China. Base on the term rulin (儒林), the author considers “ru” to be a social class composed of literati who influenced history through their collective self-awareness as well as their way to define zhi (知,knowledge). The crisis of Ruism of the late Ming period was due to the fact that intellectual pursuance turned to be superficial and fragmented discussions of li (理, reason) instead of substantial integration of cross-disciplinary knowledge. The new paradigm of Qing Ruism essentially benefited from the flaws of the late Ming Ruism, moving away from empty discussions of li and revitalizing the integration of knowledge across multiple disciplines and levels.
關聯 政大中文學報, 43, 1-58
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.30407/BDCL.202506_(43).0001
dc.contributor 政大中文學報
dc.creator (作者) 鄭吉雄
dc.creator (作者) Cheng, Dennis K. H.
dc.date (日期) 2025-06
dc.date.accessioned 30-Jun-2025 09:06:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 30-Jun-2025 09:06:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Jun-2025 09:06:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157597-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文論近世「儒」的論說與變遷,從蒙元修撰《宋史》、滿清修撰《明史》皆於「儒林傳」外另立「道學」或「理學傳」談起,檢討諸儒的言論,以見明清儒學典範轉移的關鍵。筆者揭示「儒林」一詞,認為歷史上「儒」為一群體形成之社會階層,與時代升降相為表裡,故「儒」的身分設定,取決於群體自覺,以及群儒的治學內容。明末儒學衰微,肇因於儒者耽於「理」的討論導致知識嚴重貧乏,由此而引起儒者掀起的知識多元化運動,從文章、經史、經世等各類知識充實儒學,進而奠立清代儒學的基調。明清儒學典範性轉化,實受惠於晚明儒學衰微的刺激。故清代多元而充實的儒學開花結果,實得力於晚明儒學的花落腐土,化為春泥。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Beginning from discussing the separation of lixue (理學) and daoxue (道學) from rulin zhuan (儒林傳) in Chinese dynastic histories, this paper discusses the shifting discourses on “Ru” in late imperial China and attempts to reexamine existing scholarship by revealing the key factors leading to the paradigm shift of Ruism in late imperial China. Base on the term rulin (儒林), the author considers “ru” to be a social class composed of literati who influenced history through their collective self-awareness as well as their way to define zhi (知,knowledge). The crisis of Ruism of the late Ming period was due to the fact that intellectual pursuance turned to be superficial and fragmented discussions of li (理, reason) instead of substantial integration of cross-disciplinary knowledge. The new paradigm of Qing Ruism essentially benefited from the flaws of the late Ming Ruism, moving away from empty discussions of li and revitalizing the integration of knowledge across multiple disciplines and levels.
dc.format.extent 3309432 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 政大中文學報, 43, 1-58
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 儒; 儒林; 理學; 明末清初; 典範轉移
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ruism; philosophy; philology; late Imperial China; paradigm shift
dc.title (題名) 近世「儒」的論說與變遷――知識的典範轉移
dc.title (題名) Shifting Discourses on “Ru” in Modern China: A Paradigm Shift
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.30407/BDCL.202506_(43).0001
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.30407/BDCL.202506_(43).0001