Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 查核風險與關鍵查核事項報導之關聯性研究—以會計師懲戒案例為例
A Study on the Relationship between Audit Risk and Key Audit Matters Reporting: Evidence from Disciplinary Cases of Auditors
作者 陳碧儀
Chen, Bi-Yi
貢獻者 戚務君
Chi, Wu-Chun
陳碧儀
Chen, Bi-Yi
關鍵詞 會計師懲戒
關鍵查核事項
查核風險
Auditor Disciplinary Actions
Key Audit Matters (KAM)
Audit Risk
日期 2024
上傳時間 1-Jul-2025 14:24:43 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究藉由探討會計師懲戒緣由及對應年度關鍵查核事項之揭露內容,檢視審計失敗與關鍵查核事項報導間之關聯性。研究發現,在40%的懲戒案例中,會計師已透過關鍵查核事項之揭露報導財務報表的重大誤述風險;餘60%之懲戒案例,則顯示會計師未能報導攸關的查核風險,因而反映會計師風險辨識之挑戰。其中,會計師實際遭懲戒之緣由主要為收入、財報正確性/存在性及內部控制等因素;而關鍵查核事項報導類別多為收入、存貨評價及應收款項減損。本研究建議會計師事務所再提升查核風險辨識之效能,據以決定審計方向和範圍,期能有效降低財務違失事件,避免受到主管機關懲戒處分,以維護會計師行業之專業信譽。
This study examines the relationship between audit failure and Key Audit Matters (KAM) reporting by analyzing disciplinary reasons of auditors and the disclosure of corresponding KAMs in the relevant audit years. The findings reveal that in 40% of the disciplinary cases, auditors identified risks of material misstatement of financial statements through disclosure of KAM reporting. In the remaining 60% of cases, auditors failed to report critical audit risks, thus reflecting challenges in risk identification. The actual primary reasons for auditor sanctions include issues related to revenue, the accuracy or existence of financial statements, and internal controls. In contrast, the most frequently reported KAM categories are revenue, inventory valuation, and impairment of receivables. The study suggests that audit firms should further enhance the effectiveness of audit risk identification to determine audit process better, thereby reducing financial misstatements and avoiding regulatory sanctions, ultimately preserving the professional reputation of the auditing profession.
參考文獻 中文部分 王淑以、鄭郁平、傅沁怡,2023年4月25日,康友掏空案 勤業及2會計師一審判賠逾26億,工商時報,檢自:https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20230425700673-430298。 王曉雯、曾雲蘭、徐冠允,2023,關鍵查核事項與權益資金成本-以台灣上市櫃公司為例,證券市場發展季刊,第35期第2卷:93-138。 史雅男與曾家璿,2023,新式查核報告修訂對公司投資與現金流量敏感度之影響,證券市場發展季刊,第35期第2卷:43-92。 何里仁與許稜婉,2024,會計師輪調對關鍵查核事項揭露的影響,當代會計,第25期第1卷:115-163。 杜榮瑞、林孝倫、李德冠,2022,關鍵查核事項的揭露與投資人對會計師責任判斷之關係,當代會計,第23期第1卷:1-39。 官月緞、史雅男、曾家璿,2022,關鍵查核事項揭露與審計品質及審計報告時效性之關聯,中山管理評論,第30期第4卷:705-754。 金融監督管理委員會,2020年9月29日,金管證審字第1090364602號裁處書、金管證審字第10903646021號裁處書,檢自:https://www.sfb.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=103&parentpath=0,2,102&mcustomize=multimessages_view.jsp&dataserno=202010080001&dtable=Penalty。 俞洪昭、戚務君、李承易,2000,我國會計師受懲戒原因與種類之關聯性分析,風險管理學報,第2期第2卷:37-56。 洪玉舜與顏信輝,2011,會計師懲戒程度對簽證保守性之影響,管理學報,第28期第4卷:325-343。 張祐慈、謝安軒、陳美惠、戚務君,2021,關鍵查核事項複雜度與股價崩跌風險,會計審計論叢,第11期第1卷:1-31。 張璦,2024年6月17日,康友-KY案簽證會計師被判刑 勤業眾信:研議上訴,經濟日報,檢自:https://money.udn.com/money/story/5607/8036943。 郭大維,2020,臺灣會計師懲戒處分制度之探討──以證券交易法第37條第3項為核心,月旦會計實務研究,第33期:34-40。 陳美惠、謝安軒、張祐慈、戚務君,2021,關鍵查核事項是制式八股文嗎?中華會計學刊,第17期第2卷:183-244。 曾家璿與史雅男,2019,會計師產業專精與關鍵查核事項揭露之關聯,中華會計學刊,第15期第1卷:37-76。 黃劭彥、卓佳慶、蔡昀瑾、林琦珍,2015,影響會計師懲戒對簽證客戶資訊蔓延效果之因素,會計學報,第6期第1卷:63-96。 會計師法,2018,第61-63條。 顏信輝、陳慧玲、鄭楚媛,2022,關鍵查核事項警示功能之探討:以實質盈餘管理為例,會計審計論叢,第12期第1卷:35-73。 顏瑞田,2023年10月3日,會計師遭懲戒 財務報告簽證占91%居冠,工商時報,檢自:https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20231003701569-430103。 證券交易法,2024,第37條。   英文部分 Acito, A. A., C. E. Hogan, and R. D. Mergenthaler. 2018. The effects of PCAOB inspections on auditor-client relationships. The Accounting Review 93(2): 1-35. Backof, A. G., K. Bowlin, and B. M. Goodson. 2022. The importance of clarification of auditors’ responsibilities under the new audit reporting standards. Contemporary Accounting Research 39(4): 2284–2304. Boone, J.P., Khurana, I.K. and Raman, K.K. 2015. “Did the 2007 PCAOB disciplinary order against Deloitte impose actual costs on the firm or improve its audit quality?”. The Accounting Review 90(2): 405-441. Brasel, K., M. M. Doxey, J. H. Grenier, and A. Reffett. 2016. Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of auditor liability. The Accounting Review 91(5): 1345–1362. Chang, W., Y. Chen, L. Chou, and C. Ko. 2016. Audit partner disciplinary actions and financial restatements. Abacus 52(2): 286-318. Chang, Y., J. Chen, W. Chi, and J. He. 2024b. Key audit matters and financial misstatements: Evaluating auditor effectiveness. working paper. Chang, Y., W. Chi, and D. N. Stone. 2024a. Is client-specific information useful to investors? Evidence from key audit matter reports. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 39(3): 786-806. DeFond, M. and J. Zhang. 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 58(2-3): 275-326. Du, N., J. Ronen, and J. Ye. 2015. Auditors’ role in China: The joint effects of guanxi and regulatory sanctions on earnings management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 30(4): 461-483. Feng, Z., L. Z. Li, H. Y. Wong, and J. Wong. 2023. Regulatory intervention and audit quality: new evidence from audit firm suspension. Meditari Accountancy Research 31(5): 1165-1189. Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23(1): 141-191. Lennox, C. and B. Li. 2014. Accounting misstatements following lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting and Economics 57(1): 58-75. Li, L., B. Qi, G. Tian, and G. Zhang. 2017. The contagion effect of low-quality audits at the level of individual auditors. The Accounting Review 92 (1): 137-163.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
112932118
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112932118
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 戚務君zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chi, Wu-Chunen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳碧儀zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Bi-Yien_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳碧儀zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Bi-Yien_US
dc.date (日期) 2024en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Jul-2025 14:24:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Jul-2025 14:24:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Jul-2025 14:24:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0112932118en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157705-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 112932118zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究藉由探討會計師懲戒緣由及對應年度關鍵查核事項之揭露內容,檢視審計失敗與關鍵查核事項報導間之關聯性。研究發現,在40%的懲戒案例中,會計師已透過關鍵查核事項之揭露報導財務報表的重大誤述風險;餘60%之懲戒案例,則顯示會計師未能報導攸關的查核風險,因而反映會計師風險辨識之挑戰。其中,會計師實際遭懲戒之緣由主要為收入、財報正確性/存在性及內部控制等因素;而關鍵查核事項報導類別多為收入、存貨評價及應收款項減損。本研究建議會計師事務所再提升查核風險辨識之效能,據以決定審計方向和範圍,期能有效降低財務違失事件,避免受到主管機關懲戒處分,以維護會計師行業之專業信譽。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study examines the relationship between audit failure and Key Audit Matters (KAM) reporting by analyzing disciplinary reasons of auditors and the disclosure of corresponding KAMs in the relevant audit years. The findings reveal that in 40% of the disciplinary cases, auditors identified risks of material misstatement of financial statements through disclosure of KAM reporting. In the remaining 60% of cases, auditors failed to report critical audit risks, thus reflecting challenges in risk identification. The actual primary reasons for auditor sanctions include issues related to revenue, the accuracy or existence of financial statements, and internal controls. In contrast, the most frequently reported KAM categories are revenue, inventory valuation, and impairment of receivables. The study suggests that audit firms should further enhance the effectiveness of audit risk identification to determine audit process better, thereby reducing financial misstatements and avoiding regulatory sanctions, ultimately preserving the professional reputation of the auditing profession.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭 I 摘要 II Abstract III 目錄 4 表目錄 6 圖目錄 7 第一章 緒論 8 第一節 研究動機與背景 8 第二節 研究目的 14 第三節 研究流程 15 第二章 文獻探討 16 第一節 會計師懲戒 16 2.1.1 會計師懲戒定義 16 2.1.2 會計師懲戒過往研究 18 第二節 關鍵查核事項 22 2.2.1 關鍵查核事項定義 22 2.2.2 查核風險辨識與關鍵查核事項揭露 22 2.2.3 關鍵查核事項之資訊意涵 24 第三節 會計師懲戒與關鍵查核事項 29 第三章 研究問題與方法 31 第一節 研究問題 31 第二節 研究方法 33 第四章 實證結果 36 第一節 樣本概況簡介 36 4.1.1 資料蒐集來源 36 4.1.2 懲戒機關及會計師背景分類 40 第二節 懲戒類別與關鍵查核事項報導之分析比較 42 4.2.1 懲戒緣由類別出現頻次與關鍵查核事項報導分析結果 42 4.2.2 已報導之關鍵查核事項類別與懲戒緣由之分析討論 44 4.2.3 懲戒緣由類別與關鍵查核事項報導之組合及意涵 46 4.2.4 關鍵查核事項報導數量之平均數檢定 47 4.2.5 依會計師事務所類型分類之分析結果 49 4.2.6 依會計師性別分類之分析結果 52 4.2.7 實證結果總結 55 第五章 結論與建議 57 第一節 結論 57 第二節 建議 59 參考文獻 61 附錄 64 附錄一 64 附錄二 69zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2088437 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112932118en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 會計師懲戒zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 關鍵查核事項zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 查核風險zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Auditor Disciplinary Actionsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Key Audit Matters (KAM)en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Audit Risken_US
dc.title (題名) 查核風險與關鍵查核事項報導之關聯性研究—以會計師懲戒案例為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study on the Relationship between Audit Risk and Key Audit Matters Reporting: Evidence from Disciplinary Cases of Auditorsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分 王淑以、鄭郁平、傅沁怡,2023年4月25日,康友掏空案 勤業及2會計師一審判賠逾26億,工商時報,檢自:https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20230425700673-430298。 王曉雯、曾雲蘭、徐冠允,2023,關鍵查核事項與權益資金成本-以台灣上市櫃公司為例,證券市場發展季刊,第35期第2卷:93-138。 史雅男與曾家璿,2023,新式查核報告修訂對公司投資與現金流量敏感度之影響,證券市場發展季刊,第35期第2卷:43-92。 何里仁與許稜婉,2024,會計師輪調對關鍵查核事項揭露的影響,當代會計,第25期第1卷:115-163。 杜榮瑞、林孝倫、李德冠,2022,關鍵查核事項的揭露與投資人對會計師責任判斷之關係,當代會計,第23期第1卷:1-39。 官月緞、史雅男、曾家璿,2022,關鍵查核事項揭露與審計品質及審計報告時效性之關聯,中山管理評論,第30期第4卷:705-754。 金融監督管理委員會,2020年9月29日,金管證審字第1090364602號裁處書、金管證審字第10903646021號裁處書,檢自:https://www.sfb.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=103&parentpath=0,2,102&mcustomize=multimessages_view.jsp&dataserno=202010080001&dtable=Penalty。 俞洪昭、戚務君、李承易,2000,我國會計師受懲戒原因與種類之關聯性分析,風險管理學報,第2期第2卷:37-56。 洪玉舜與顏信輝,2011,會計師懲戒程度對簽證保守性之影響,管理學報,第28期第4卷:325-343。 張祐慈、謝安軒、陳美惠、戚務君,2021,關鍵查核事項複雜度與股價崩跌風險,會計審計論叢,第11期第1卷:1-31。 張璦,2024年6月17日,康友-KY案簽證會計師被判刑 勤業眾信:研議上訴,經濟日報,檢自:https://money.udn.com/money/story/5607/8036943。 郭大維,2020,臺灣會計師懲戒處分制度之探討──以證券交易法第37條第3項為核心,月旦會計實務研究,第33期:34-40。 陳美惠、謝安軒、張祐慈、戚務君,2021,關鍵查核事項是制式八股文嗎?中華會計學刊,第17期第2卷:183-244。 曾家璿與史雅男,2019,會計師產業專精與關鍵查核事項揭露之關聯,中華會計學刊,第15期第1卷:37-76。 黃劭彥、卓佳慶、蔡昀瑾、林琦珍,2015,影響會計師懲戒對簽證客戶資訊蔓延效果之因素,會計學報,第6期第1卷:63-96。 會計師法,2018,第61-63條。 顏信輝、陳慧玲、鄭楚媛,2022,關鍵查核事項警示功能之探討:以實質盈餘管理為例,會計審計論叢,第12期第1卷:35-73。 顏瑞田,2023年10月3日,會計師遭懲戒 財務報告簽證占91%居冠,工商時報,檢自:https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20231003701569-430103。 證券交易法,2024,第37條。   英文部分 Acito, A. A., C. E. Hogan, and R. D. Mergenthaler. 2018. The effects of PCAOB inspections on auditor-client relationships. The Accounting Review 93(2): 1-35. Backof, A. G., K. Bowlin, and B. M. Goodson. 2022. The importance of clarification of auditors’ responsibilities under the new audit reporting standards. Contemporary Accounting Research 39(4): 2284–2304. Boone, J.P., Khurana, I.K. and Raman, K.K. 2015. “Did the 2007 PCAOB disciplinary order against Deloitte impose actual costs on the firm or improve its audit quality?”. The Accounting Review 90(2): 405-441. Brasel, K., M. M. Doxey, J. H. Grenier, and A. Reffett. 2016. Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of auditor liability. The Accounting Review 91(5): 1345–1362. Chang, W., Y. Chen, L. Chou, and C. Ko. 2016. Audit partner disciplinary actions and financial restatements. Abacus 52(2): 286-318. Chang, Y., J. Chen, W. Chi, and J. He. 2024b. Key audit matters and financial misstatements: Evaluating auditor effectiveness. working paper. Chang, Y., W. Chi, and D. N. Stone. 2024a. Is client-specific information useful to investors? Evidence from key audit matter reports. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 39(3): 786-806. DeFond, M. and J. Zhang. 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 58(2-3): 275-326. Du, N., J. Ronen, and J. Ye. 2015. Auditors’ role in China: The joint effects of guanxi and regulatory sanctions on earnings management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 30(4): 461-483. Feng, Z., L. Z. Li, H. Y. Wong, and J. Wong. 2023. Regulatory intervention and audit quality: new evidence from audit firm suspension. Meditari Accountancy Research 31(5): 1165-1189. Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23(1): 141-191. Lennox, C. and B. Li. 2014. Accounting misstatements following lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting and Economics 57(1): 58-75. Li, L., B. Qi, G. Tian, and G. Zhang. 2017. The contagion effect of low-quality audits at the level of individual auditors. The Accounting Review 92 (1): 137-163.zh_TW