| dc.contributor | 社工所 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 王增勇 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2019-12 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 23-Jul-2025 10:49:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 23-Jul-2025 10:49:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 23-Jul-2025 10:49:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158152 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究探討台灣的精障會所如何透過影像、繪畫、戲劇等藝術形式，進行社會對話，推動精障者去污名的歷程。在台灣，精神疾病是被高度污名化，精障者以「病人」及「案主」的角色出現公共領域。受到西方會所模式所啟發的伊甸基金會活泉/真福會所和台北市康復之友協會的慈芳會所是台灣少數以「非病人」角色對待精障者，並試圖以一起工作生活的方式，讓精障者在社區中有個歸屬感的家。起持續七年以繪畫、影像、戲劇、說故事等藝術形式對台灣社會進行公開展覽，讓精障者的故事與聲音被一般民眾所看見並邀請參與對話，作為台灣會所推動去污名的實踐策略，推動社會融合與社會對話。我的研究問題分為三個層次進行：1.在個人經驗層次，在一個精神疾病高度被污名化的社會，慢性精神障礙者是經過怎樣的過程將個人不堪的經驗轉化成為一個可以被理解的故事？精神障礙者如何願意克服自己內化的精障污名，在公開場合被陌生人赤裸裸地看見自己的故事？ 2.在社工實務上，會所是如何運用這些藝術形式協助這些參展的精障者？工作者在過程中會遭遇怎樣的困難？又如何克服？ 3.在服務體制上，會所為何會推動藝術展覽來面對台灣社會？研究設計將以民族誌的蹲點方式，分別在兩個會所，跟隨展覽從籌備、招募、構思、創作、展覽、展後檢討與追蹤的完整過程，每個會所預計蹲點一年半。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This research is focused on the process of art exhibition by clubhouses in Taiwan, which is aimed at promoting social dialogue through artistic performance such as drama, painting and photos. Mental illness is highly stigmatized in Taiwan that people with mental illness tend to be presented as patients or clients. Inspired by Western clubhouse model, Fountain House and Easy House in Taiwan are the few service programs in which people with mental illness are treated as non-patients and clubhouse is a home for them in the community. Since 2009, the two clubhouses have initiated an annual are exhibition by their members, in which members tell their stories through various forms of art, to promote social inclusion and dialogue. Research questions are three-fold: 1. At the individual level, how participants transform their lived experiences into understandable stories that are ready for public? Why participants are willing to show their private lives to strangers? At the practice level, how social workers use the art forms to help participants speak out for themselves? What kind of difficulties social workers encountered? At the policy level, why clubhouses choose art exhibition as the form of social dialogue to de-stigmatize mental illness? Ethnography will be adopted as research design in the two clubhouses. Each case will be studied for the whole process of recruiting, narrative group, creating arts, public exhibition and follow-up in the period of 18 months. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST106-2410-H004-144-MY2, 106.08-108.07 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 會所; 藝術展演; 去污名; 社區精神復健; 慢性精神障礙者 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | clubhouse; art performance; de-stigmatization; community psychiatric rehabilitation; people with chronically mental illness | |
| dc.title (題名) | 從病人到公民的去污名化歷程：精障者的藝術展演與社會對話 | |
| dc.title (題名) | The Process of De-Stigmatization from Patienthood to Citizenship: the Art Performance and Social Dialogue of People with Mental Illness | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
