| dc.contributor | 法律系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 許政賢 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2019-10 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 30-Jul-2025 11:57:53 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 30-Jul-2025 11:57:53 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 30-Jul-2025 11:57:53 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158183 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 民訴法於2003年間增訂第469條之1規定，其中所指法之續造、確保裁判之一致性，係參考德國民訴法第511條、第543條規定，而採行上訴許可制，在要件上已較修法前趨於嚴格。但在實務上，最高法院似未放棄1990年第1次民事庭決議所建立標準，仍對原審判決所認定事實加以審查，並積極扮演個案救濟之角色。換言之，目前最高法院之主要任務，仍係糾正下級審法院之裁判上錯誤，並非專注於法律解釋與適用。「2017年司改會議」再次重申第三審應以詮釋法律之重要內涵為主要任務，而以近10年內之統計資料而言，原審判決遭廢棄發回之比例超過百分之二十，則以此種現實條件，逕將最高法院之功能嚴格限定以法律解釋與適用為主，是否妥適，似有疑義。本計畫擬進一步追蹤並分析廢棄發回判決與裁判正確性之關係，以釐清廢棄發回率是否等同個案救濟正確率，以期對於金字塔訴訟制度之建構，及最高法院法律審任務之定位，及司法行政當局在推動相關政策之設計上，提供重要參考資料。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | According to the second paragraph of Article 469-1: ” The permission provided in the preceding paragraph shall be granted only when such an appeal is necessary for the continued development of the laws, or to ensure coherence of decisions, or when other legal opinions involved are significant in principle.“ The intention of the legislator has make effort to redefine the function of the Supreme Court regarding the review of the final judgment of a court of second instance. However, the Supreme Court has followed the established standards in regard with the grounds that the original judgment is in contravention of the laws and regulations. This development has initiated some reforms in recent years and also stimulated intense discussion. In this context the author tries to conduct an empirical study in which the judgments of the Supreme Court reversing the judgments of the courts of second instance during the first half year of 2011 will be examined by empirical method. The result of this study may contribute to the decision-making process of the policy maker and the researcher as well. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST107-2410-H004-060, 107.08-108.07 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 違背法令; 法之續造; 原則上重要性; 上訴許可制 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | in contravention of the laws and regulations; the continued development of the laws; significant in principle; permission of an appeal | |
| dc.title (題名) | 法律詮釋或事實審查之實證分析─以最高法院2011上半年度發回更審之民事判決為對象 | |
| dc.title (題名) | Interpretation of Laws or Review of Facts-Focusing on the Judgments of the Supreme Court Reversing the Judgments of the Courts of Second Instance during the First Half Year of 2011 | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
