| dc.contributor | 法律系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 許政賢 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2022-10 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 31-Jul-2025 15:41:20 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 31-Jul-2025 15:41:20 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 31-Jul-2025 15:41:20 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158185 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 法院組織法自2019年1月4日修正公布後，施行近百年的判例制度正式廢除。此項司法制度之重大變革，除具有改革之象徵意義外，對於司法裁判行為之實質影響為何，實具有研究上之高度重要性。未來法院在適用判決先例之法律見解時，對於個案基礎事實類同之判斷，顯得異常重要。但在大量實務案例中，如何建立精細區辨案件基礎事實差異之方法，似屬判例制度廢止後，最高法院所需面對之重大挑戰。本計畫擬以最高法院2019、2020年度民事裁判為對象，針對特定裁判適用判決先例原則時，如何區辨案件基礎事實之類同與否，及是否有類型化之空間，加以進一步探究。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | After the amendments of the Court Organic Act were promulgated on January 4, 2019, the precedent institution that has been in effect for nearly a century has been officially abolished. Apart from the symbolic significance of the reform, this tremendous change in the judiciary is of great research significance. In applying the legal opinion of the precedent, the court's distinguishing methods regarding the facts of the cases are more important in the future. However, how to establish the methods of distinguishing the facts of the cases in detail is a major challenge that the Supreme Court must face after the abolition of the precedent institution. This study intends to take the Supreme Court's civil decisions in 2019 and 2020 as the target. When applying the principles of the precedent to a specific decision, how to distinguish the similarity or absence of the basic facts of the cases, and whether there is room for types for further exploration. It’s the main issue of this study. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST109-2410-H004-120-MY2, 109.08-111.07 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 判例制度; 裁判行為; 基礎事實; 判決先例; 區辨 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | precedent institution; judicial behavior; basic fact; precedent; distinguish | |
| dc.title (題名) | 判例制度廢止後裁判行為之初探─以最高法院 2019、2020年度民事判決為例 | |
| dc.title (題名) | The Study of Judicial Behavior After the Lifting of the Precedent Institution - An Analysis of the Supreme Court Decisions on Civil Litigation in 2019, 2020 | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
