Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表發展
Development of Quality Assessment Scale for Digital Curation Design in the Metaverse作者 邱姝軒
Chiu, Shu-Hsuan貢獻者 陳志銘<br>陳淑君
Chen, Chih-Ming<br>Chen, Shu-Jiun
邱姝軒
Chiu, Shu-Hsuan關鍵詞 元宇宙
元宇宙數位策展
數位策展
使用者體驗
品質評估
量表發展
Metaverse
Metaverse Digital Curation
Digital Curation
User Experience
Quality Assessment
Scale Development日期 2025 上傳時間 4-Aug-2025 14:02:58 (UTC+8) 摘要 隨著資訊科技的快速發展與虛擬沉浸技術的日益普及，策展已逐漸從傳統實體策展往數位策展方向發展，特別是近幾年來元宇宙的發展，更讓策展開始往元宇宙數位策展的方向發展，為觀展者帶來更豐富的互動與沉浸式的觀展體驗。然而，目前針對元宇宙數位策展的品質評估工具仍不完備，尚難以全面用於評估元宇宙數位策展所具有的獨特互動性與沉浸特質。為了彌補這個研究缺口，本研究旨在發展「元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表」，作為評量元宇宙數位策展各面向設計品質的評估工具，期能協助策展者掌握影響策展設計品質的因素構面狀況，進而依據評估結果優化策展設計，以提升觀展者的體驗與參與感，並為未來元宇宙數位策展的設計與評估提供有效的指引。 本研究採用文獻分析法與問卷調查法為研究方法。首先透過系統性文獻回顧，探討數位策展設計、策展支援學習，以及沉浸體驗相關之理論基礎與實證研究文獻，並參考九份具代表性且方法學嚴謹之問卷與量表，歸納出適用於元宇宙數位策展品質評估的關鍵評量因素構面與對應題目。初步擬定之量表涵蓋九個構面（後經修訂為八個），題目共計59題，並經由預試後之項目分析、探索性因素分析（EFA），以及信效度檢驗後獲得修正之問卷；基於修正之問卷，再進行正式施測後，進一步進行驗證性因素分析（CFA），據以建構正式之「元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表」，以作為元宇宙數位策展設計之有效品質評估工具。 研究結果顯示，預試階段分析初步設計之量表後刪除一個因素構面，保留了八個因素構面，分別為：資訊品質、認知負荷、認知有用、好奇心、控制感、沉浸感、臨場感與使用意圖，修訂後量表共計44題，整體具良好之內部一致性與信效度。正式施測階段進一步以驗證性因素分析檢驗量表結構，結果顯示模型適配度指標達可接受標準（CFI = 0.903、RMSEA = 0.063、χ²/df = 1.679），支持量表之建構效度。最終量表保留八個構面，共計39題，作為「元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表」之正式版本。 整體而言，本研究所發展之量表有助於策展者掌握影響策展設計品質之關鍵因素構面，並可依據評估結果來優化策展設計，提升觀展者的體驗與參與感，進而為未來元宇宙數位策展之設計與評估提供具體指引。
With the rapid development of information technology and the growing adoption of immersive virtual experiences, curation practices have increasingly shifted from traditional physical exhibitions to digital curation. In recent years, the rise of the metaverse has further accelerated this trend, providing audiences with richer, interactive, and immersive curation experiences. However, existing evaluation tools remain insufficient for assessing the unique qualities of metaverse-based digital curation, particularly its interactivity and immersive characteristics. To address this gap, this study aims to develop a “Quality Evaluation Scale for Metaverse Digital Curation Design.” The scale is intended to serve as a tool for assessing the design quality of metaverse digital curation, helping curators identify key factors that influence curation design quality. Ultimately, it aims to enhance visitor engagement and offer practical guidance for future metaverse digital curation and evaluation. This study employed literature analysis and questionnaire surveys as its research methods. A systematic literature review was first conducted to explore the theoretical foundations and empirical research related to digital curation design, curation-supported learning, and immersive experiences. In addition, nine representative and methodologically rigorous questionnaires and scales were referenced to identify key evaluation dimensions and corresponding items for assessing the quality of metaverse digital curation. An initial scale comprising nine dimensions (later refined to eight) and 59 items was developed. After a pilot test, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability and validity checks were conducted to refine the scale. A formal survey was then conducted, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to finalize the “Quality Evaluation Scale for Metaverse Digital Curation Design” as a valid evaluation tool. The results indicated that, following the pilot phase analysis, one factor was removed from the initial scale, resulting in a scale with eight dimensions: information quality, cognitive load, perceived usefulness, curiosity, control, immersion, presence, and behavioral intention. The revised scale consisted of 44 items and demonstrated good internal consistency and construct validity. In the formal testing phase, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the scale’s structure. The model fit indices met acceptable thresholds (CFI = 0.903, RMSEA = 0.063, χ²/df = 1.679), supporting the construct validity of the scale. The finalized version of the “Quality Evaluation Scale for Metaverse Digital Curation Design” retained eight dimensions with a total of 39 items. Overall, the scale developed in this study provides curators with a useful and structured tool for identifying key dimensions that influence the quality of metaverse digital curation design. It enables curators to optimize their design strategies based on evaluation results, thereby enhancing visitor experience and engagement. Ultimately, the scale offers practical guidance for the future design and evaluation of metaverse digital curation.參考文獻 Ahn, S. J. （Grace）, Kim, J., & Kim, J. （2022）. The Bifold Triadic Relationships Framework: A Theoretical Primer for Advertising Research in the Metaverse. Journal of Advertising, 51（5）, 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2111729 Atsikpasi, P., & Fokides, E. （2022）. A scoping review of the educational uses of 6DoF HMDs. Virtual Reality, 26（1）, 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00556-9 Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. （1992）. Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage. Human Relations, 45（7）, 659–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500702 Bonis, B., Stamos, J., Vosinakis, S., Andreou, I., & Panayiotopoulos, T. （2009）. A platform for virtual museums with personalized content. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 42（2）, 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-008-0231-2 Boo, C., & Suh, A. （2024）. Developing scales for assessing metaverse characteristics and testing their utility. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 13, 100366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100366 Casillo, M., Cecere, L., Colace, F., Lorusso, A., Santaniello, D., & Valentino, C. （2023）. Exhibition spaces in the metaverse: A novel design approach. 2023 8th IEEE History of Electrotechnology Conference （HIS℡CON）, 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/HIS℡CON56357.2023.10365847 Chen, C. M., & Huang, M. Y. （2024）. Enhancing programming learning performance through a Jigsaw collaborative learning method in a metaverse virtual space. International Journal of STEM Education, 11（1）, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00495-2 Cheng, A., Ma, D., Pan, Y., & Qian, H. （2024）. Enhancing Museum Visiting Experience: Investigating the Relationships Between Augmented Reality Quality, Immersion, and TAM Using PLS-SEM. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40（17）, 4521–4532. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2227832 Cheung, M. L., Leung, W. K. S., Chang, L. M. K., Aw, E. C.-X., & Wong, R. Y. M. （2024）. Immersive time in the metaverse and visits to the physical world: Why not both? A holistic customer engagement framework. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36（11）, 3674–3703. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2023-0999 Choi, W., Rho, M. J., Park, J., Kim, K.-J., Kwon, Y. D., & Choi, I. Y. （2013）. Information System Success Model for Customer Relationship Management System in Health Promotion Centers. Healthcare Informatics Research, 19（2）, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2013.19.2.110 Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. （1986）. Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, 32（5）, 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 Davis, F. D. （1989）. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13（3）, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 Davis, F. D. （1993）. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38（3）, 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022 De Paolis, L. T., & De Luca, V. （2022）. The effects of touchless interaction on usability and sense of presence in a virtual environment. Virtual Reality, 26（4）, 1551–1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00647-1 DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. （1992）. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3（1）, 60–95. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60 Deng, X., & Yu, Z. （2023）. An extended hedonic motivation adoption model of TikTok in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 28（10）, 13595–13617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11749-x Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. （1998）. Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9（3）, 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256 Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524 Dong. （2021）. Combining cognitive disorder treatment technology with VR technology, opening a new market for game-based mental fitness. Dong-A Business Review. https://dbr.donga.com/article/view/1203/article_no/10188/ac/magazine Duan, H., Li, J., Fan, S., Lin, Z., Wu, X., & Cai, W. （2021）. Metaverse for Social Good: A University Campus Prototype. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474085.3479238 Ertz, M., Jo, M.-S., Kong, Y., & Sarigöllü, E. （2022）. Predicting m-shopping in the two largest m-commerce markets: The United States and China. International Journal of Market Research, 64（2）, 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853211023036 Fokides, E. （2023）. Development and testing of a scale for examining factors affecting the learning experience in the Metaverse. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100025 Forkosh Baruch, A., & Gadot, R. （2021）. Social Curation Experience: Towards Authentic Learning in Preservice Teacher Training. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26（1）, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09449-3 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 Fotakis, T., & Economides, A. A. （2008）. Art, science/technology and history museums on the web. International Journal of Digital Culture and Electronic Tourism, 1（1）, 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDCET.2008.020134 Gadot, R., & Tsybulsky, D. （2023）. Digital Curation as a Pedagogical Approach to Promote Critical Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32（6）, 814–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10016-x Gao, F., & Keller, V. （2024）. The effect of digital curation on visitor behavior in museum expositions. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8（9）. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.6153 Gorsuch, R. L. （1983）. Three methods for analyzing limited time-series （N of 1） data. Behavioral Assessment, 5（2）, 141–154. Gursoy, D., Lu, L., Nunkoo, R., & Deng, D. （2023）. Metaverse in services marketing: An overview and future research directions. The Service Industries Journal, 43（15–16）, 1140–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2252750 Gursoy, D., Malodia, S., & Dhir, A. （2022）. The metaverse in the hospitality and tourism industry: An overview of current trends and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19368623.2022.2072504 Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.): With readings. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson. Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. （2006）. User experience—A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25（2）, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331 He, D., Yao, Z., Tang, P., & Ma, Y. （2023）. Impacts of different interactions on viewers’ sense of virtual community: An empirical study of live streaming platform. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42（7）, 940–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2053884 Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106 Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. SAGE. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Hwang, G.-J., & Chien, S.-Y. （2022）. Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100082 Ibili, E., & Billinghurst, M. （2019）. Assessing the Relationship between Cognitive Load and the Usability of a Mobile Augmented Reality Tutorial System: A Study of Gender Effects. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6（3）, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.594749 Kari, T., & Kosa, M. （2023）. Acceptance and use of virtual reality games: An extension of HMSAM. Virtual Reality, 27（3）, 1585–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00749-4 Kim, H.-C., & Hyun, M. Y. （2016）. Predicting the use of smartphone-based Augmented Reality （AR）: Does telepresence really help? Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.001 Kim, M. J., & Hall, C. M. （2019）. A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: Comparing visitors and non-visitors. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.016 Kim, S. （2018）. Virtual exhibitions and communication factors. Museum Management and Curatorship, 33（3）, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1466190 Kim, S., & Hong, S. （2020）. How Virtual Exhibition Presentation Affects Visitor Communication and Enjoyment: An Exploration of 2D versus 3D. The Design Journal, 23（5）, 677–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1806580 Lee, J. （2022）. A study on the intention and experience of using the metaverse. Jahr : Europski Časopis Za Bioetiku, 13（1）, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.21860/j.13.1.10 Lee, U.-K. （2022）. Tourism Using Virtual Reality: Media Richness and Information System Successes. Sustainability （Switzerland）, 14（7）. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073975 Liu, X., & Zhang, N. （2022）. Interactive Display of Images in Digital Exhibition Halls under Artificial Intelligence and Mixed Reality Technology. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022（1）, 3688797. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3688797 Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. （1997）. At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3（2）, JCMC321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x Lowry, P. B., Gaskin, J., Twyman, N., Hammer, B., & Roberts, T. （2012）. Taking ‘Fun and Games’ Seriously: Proposing the Hedonic-Motivation System Adoption Model （HMSAM） （SSRN Scholarly Paper 2177442）. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2177442 Lowry, P., Gaskin, J., & Moody, G. （2015）. Proposing the Multimotive Information Systems Continuance Model （MISC） to Better Explain End-User System Evaluations and Continuance Intentions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16（7）. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00403 MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5 Montazer, F., & Ahmadi, M. （2024）. Designing Adaptive Interfaces in the Metaverse: Reducing Cognitive Load for Enhanced User Experience. International Journal of Advanced Human Computer Interaction, 2（2）, Article 2. Mystakidis, S. （2022）. Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2（1）, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010031 Pallavicini, F., Pepe, A., Ferrari, A., Garcea, G., Zanacchi, A., & Mantovani, F. （2020）. What Is the Relationship Among Positive Emotions, Sense of Presence, and Ease of Interaction in Virtual Reality Systems? An On-Site Evaluation of a Commercial Virtual Experience. Presence, 27（2）, 183–201. Presence. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00325 Park, S.-H., Mahony, D. F., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. D. （2015）. Curiosity generating advertisements and their impact on sport consumer behavior. Sport Management Review, 18（3）, 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2014.10.002 Park, S.-M., & Kim, Y.-G. （2022）. A Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 4209–4251. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175 Polys, N., Roshan, S., Newton, E., Narula, M., & Thai, B.-T. （2022）. Designing for Social Interactions in a Virtual Art Gallery. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3564533.3564562 Raad, H., & Rashid, F. K. M. （2023）. The Metaverse: Applications, Concerns, Technical Challenges, Future Directions and Recommendations. IEEE Access, 11, 110850–110861. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3321650 Rosenbaum, S. C. （2011）. Curation nation: How to win in a world where consumers are creators : why the future of content is context. McGraw-Hill. https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/-/9780071760393/?ar Schutte, N. S. （2020）. The Impact of Virtual Reality on Curiosity and Other Positive Characteristics. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36（7）, 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1676520 Shi, M., Wang, Q., & Long, Y. （2023）. Exploring the Key Drivers of User Continuance Intention to Use Digital Museums: Evidence From China’s Sanxingdui Museum. IEEE Access, 11, 81511–81526. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3297501 Shin, C., Oh, S., & Jeong, H. （2023）. Extended Reality Platform for Metaverse Exhibition. Journal of Web Engineering, 22（7）, 1055–1073. Journal of Web Engineering. https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2275 Sidek, S. F., Yatim, M. H. M., Ariffin, S. A., & Nurzid, A. （2020）. The Acceptance Factors and Effectiveness of MOOC in the Blended Learning of Computer Architecture and Organization Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8（3）, 909–915. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080323 Stephenson, N. （1992）. Snow Crash. Penguin UK. Sweller, J. （1988）. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12（2）, 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213（88）90023-7 Sweller, J. （2011）. CHAPTER TWO - Cognitive Load Theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross （Eds.）, Psychology of Learning and Motivation （Vol. 55, pp. 37–76）. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8 Sylaiou, S., Dafiotis, P., Koukopoulos, D., Koukoulis, K., Vital, R., Antoniou, A., & Fidas, Chr. （2024）. From physical to virtual art exhibitions and beyond: Survey and some issues for consideration for the metaverse. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 66, 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.11.002 Sylaiou, S., Mania, K., Karoulis, A., & White, M. （2010）. Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68（5）, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.11.002 TREVINO, L. K., LENGEL, R. H., & DAFT, R. L. （1987）. Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. Communication Research, 14（5）, 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005006 Tsai, L.-L. （2022）. Factors That Influence Virtual Tourism Holistic Image: The Moderating Role of Sense of Presence. Sustainability, 14（1）, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010467 Tseng, F.-C., Cheng, T. C. E., Li, K., & Teng, C.-I. （2017）. How does media richness contribute to customer loyalty to mobile instant messaging? Internet Research, 27（3）, 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2016-0181 Tseng, F.-C., Huang, T.-L., Pham, T. T. L., Cheng, T. C. E., & Teng, C.-I. （2022）. How does media richness foster online gamer loyalty? International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102439 Uhm, J.-P., Lee, H.-W., & Han, J.-W. （2020）. Creating sense of presence in a virtual reality experience: Impact on neurophysiological arousal and attitude towards a winter sport. Sport Management Review, 23（4）, 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.10.003 Ullman, J. B. (n.d.). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed., pp. 653–771). Allyn & Bacon. Van der Heijden, H. （2004）. User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 28（4）, 695–704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660 Wang, H., Ning, H., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Dhelim, S., Farha, F., Ding, J., & Daneshmand, M. （2023）. A Survey on the Metaverse: The State-of-the-Art, Technologies, Applications, and Challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10（16）, 14671–14688. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3278329 Wang, M., Lee, J.-Y., & Liu, S. （2022）. The Impact of the User Characteristics of the VR Exhibition on Space Participation and Immersion. International Journal of Contents, 18（1）, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2022.18.1.001 Wang, M., Liu, S., Hu, L., & Lee, J.-Y. （2023）. A Study of Metaverse Exhibition Sustainability on the Perspective of the Experience Economy. Sustainability （Switzerland）, 15（12）. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129153 West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Sage Publications, Inc. What is digital curation? | DCC. （n.d.）. Retrieved March 8, 2025, from https://www.dcc.ac.uk/about/digital-curation William H. Delone, & Ephraim R. McLean. （2003）. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19（4）, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 Wu, Y., Jiang, Q., Liang, H., & Ni, S. （2022）. What Drives Users to Adopt a Digital Museum? A Case of Virtual Exhibition Hall of National Costume Museum. Sage Open, 12（1）, 21582440221082105. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082105 Xi, N., Chen, J., Gama, F., Riar, M., & Hamari, J. （2023）. The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload. Information Systems Frontiers, 25（2）, 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10244-x Xu, J., Liu, S., Yang, W., Fang, M., & Pan, Y. （2024）. Beyond Reality: Exploring User Experiences in the Metaverse Art Exhibition Platform from an Integrated Perspective. Electronics, 13（6）, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13061023 Yakel, E. （2007）. Digital curation. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 23（4）, 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750710831466 Yung, R., Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Potter, L. E. （2021a）. Virtual reality and tourism marketing: Conceptualizing a framework on presence, emotion, and intention. Current Issues in Tourism, 24（11）, 1505–1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1820454 Yung, R., Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Potter, L. E. （2021b）. VR the world: Experimenting with emotion and presence for tourism marketing. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.11.009 Zhao, J., & Yezhova, O. （2024）. STRATEGY OF DESIGN ONLINE MUSEUM EXHIBITION CONTENTS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Art and Design, 2, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2024.2.8 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
112155008資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112155008 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘<br>陳淑君 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Chih-Ming<br>Chen, Shu-Jiun en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 邱姝軒 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chiu, Shu-Hsuan en_US dc.creator (作者) 邱姝軒 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chiu, Shu-Hsuan en_US dc.date (日期) 2025 en_US dc.date.accessioned 4-Aug-2025 14:02:58 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-Aug-2025 14:02:58 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Aug-2025 14:02:58 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0112155008 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158486 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 112155008 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著資訊科技的快速發展與虛擬沉浸技術的日益普及，策展已逐漸從傳統實體策展往數位策展方向發展，特別是近幾年來元宇宙的發展，更讓策展開始往元宇宙數位策展的方向發展，為觀展者帶來更豐富的互動與沉浸式的觀展體驗。然而，目前針對元宇宙數位策展的品質評估工具仍不完備，尚難以全面用於評估元宇宙數位策展所具有的獨特互動性與沉浸特質。為了彌補這個研究缺口，本研究旨在發展「元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表」，作為評量元宇宙數位策展各面向設計品質的評估工具，期能協助策展者掌握影響策展設計品質的因素構面狀況，進而依據評估結果優化策展設計，以提升觀展者的體驗與參與感，並為未來元宇宙數位策展的設計與評估提供有效的指引。 本研究採用文獻分析法與問卷調查法為研究方法。首先透過系統性文獻回顧，探討數位策展設計、策展支援學習，以及沉浸體驗相關之理論基礎與實證研究文獻，並參考九份具代表性且方法學嚴謹之問卷與量表，歸納出適用於元宇宙數位策展品質評估的關鍵評量因素構面與對應題目。初步擬定之量表涵蓋九個構面（後經修訂為八個），題目共計59題，並經由預試後之項目分析、探索性因素分析（EFA），以及信效度檢驗後獲得修正之問卷；基於修正之問卷，再進行正式施測後，進一步進行驗證性因素分析（CFA），據以建構正式之「元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表」，以作為元宇宙數位策展設計之有效品質評估工具。 研究結果顯示，預試階段分析初步設計之量表後刪除一個因素構面，保留了八個因素構面，分別為：資訊品質、認知負荷、認知有用、好奇心、控制感、沉浸感、臨場感與使用意圖，修訂後量表共計44題，整體具良好之內部一致性與信效度。正式施測階段進一步以驗證性因素分析檢驗量表結構，結果顯示模型適配度指標達可接受標準（CFI = 0.903、RMSEA = 0.063、χ²/df = 1.679），支持量表之建構效度。最終量表保留八個構面，共計39題，作為「元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表」之正式版本。 整體而言，本研究所發展之量表有助於策展者掌握影響策展設計品質之關鍵因素構面，並可依據評估結果來優化策展設計，提升觀展者的體驗與參與感，進而為未來元宇宙數位策展之設計與評估提供具體指引。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the rapid development of information technology and the growing adoption of immersive virtual experiences, curation practices have increasingly shifted from traditional physical exhibitions to digital curation. In recent years, the rise of the metaverse has further accelerated this trend, providing audiences with richer, interactive, and immersive curation experiences. However, existing evaluation tools remain insufficient for assessing the unique qualities of metaverse-based digital curation, particularly its interactivity and immersive characteristics. To address this gap, this study aims to develop a “Quality Evaluation Scale for Metaverse Digital Curation Design.” The scale is intended to serve as a tool for assessing the design quality of metaverse digital curation, helping curators identify key factors that influence curation design quality. Ultimately, it aims to enhance visitor engagement and offer practical guidance for future metaverse digital curation and evaluation. This study employed literature analysis and questionnaire surveys as its research methods. A systematic literature review was first conducted to explore the theoretical foundations and empirical research related to digital curation design, curation-supported learning, and immersive experiences. In addition, nine representative and methodologically rigorous questionnaires and scales were referenced to identify key evaluation dimensions and corresponding items for assessing the quality of metaverse digital curation. An initial scale comprising nine dimensions (later refined to eight) and 59 items was developed. After a pilot test, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability and validity checks were conducted to refine the scale. A formal survey was then conducted, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to finalize the “Quality Evaluation Scale for Metaverse Digital Curation Design” as a valid evaluation tool. The results indicated that, following the pilot phase analysis, one factor was removed from the initial scale, resulting in a scale with eight dimensions: information quality, cognitive load, perceived usefulness, curiosity, control, immersion, presence, and behavioral intention. The revised scale consisted of 44 items and demonstrated good internal consistency and construct validity. In the formal testing phase, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the scale’s structure. The model fit indices met acceptable thresholds (CFI = 0.903, RMSEA = 0.063, χ²/df = 1.679), supporting the construct validity of the scale. The finalized version of the “Quality Evaluation Scale for Metaverse Digital Curation Design” retained eight dimensions with a total of 39 items. Overall, the scale developed in this study provides curators with a useful and structured tool for identifying key dimensions that influence the quality of metaverse digital curation design. It enables curators to optimize their design strategies based on evaluation results, thereby enhancing visitor experience and engagement. Ultimately, the scale offers practical guidance for the future design and evaluation of metaverse digital curation. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究問題 4 第四節 研究範圍與限制 5 第五節 重要名詞解釋 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 數位策展發展 7 第二節 元宇宙發展與應用於數位策展之現況 9 第三節 數位策展品質評估之構面與理論基礎 13 第三章 研究設計與實施 21 第一節 量表設計流程 21 第二節 研究方法 23 第三節 研究對象 25 第四節 發展之研究工具 25 第五節 問卷發展 37 第六節 研究實施步驟 39 第四章 研究結果與分析 41 第一節 量表預試結果分析 41 第二節 正式量表之施測結果分析 55 第三節 綜合討論 66 第五章 結論與建議 73 第一節 結論 73 第二節 量表設計改善建議 75 第三節 未來研究方向 76 參考文獻 78 附錄一 參與研究同意書 86 附錄二 初步設計之元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表 87 附錄三 預試階段修訂後之元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表 91 附錄四 正式之元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表 94 附錄五 構面間共變異數相關性 97 zh_TW dc.format.extent 4065440 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112155008 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 元宇宙 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 元宇宙數位策展 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位策展 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 使用者體驗 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 品質評估 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 量表發展 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Metaverse en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Metaverse Digital Curation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Digital Curation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) User Experience en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Quality Assessment en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Scale Development en_US dc.title (題名) 元宇宙數位策展設計之品質評估量表發展 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Development of Quality Assessment Scale for Digital Curation Design in the Metaverse en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ahn, S. J. （Grace）, Kim, J., & Kim, J. （2022）. The Bifold Triadic Relationships Framework: A Theoretical Primer for Advertising Research in the Metaverse. Journal of Advertising, 51（5）, 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2111729 Atsikpasi, P., & Fokides, E. （2022）. A scoping review of the educational uses of 6DoF HMDs. Virtual Reality, 26（1）, 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00556-9 Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. （1992）. Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage. Human Relations, 45（7）, 659–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500702 Bonis, B., Stamos, J., Vosinakis, S., Andreou, I., & Panayiotopoulos, T. （2009）. A platform for virtual museums with personalized content. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 42（2）, 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-008-0231-2 Boo, C., & Suh, A. （2024）. Developing scales for assessing metaverse characteristics and testing their utility. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 13, 100366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100366 Casillo, M., Cecere, L., Colace, F., Lorusso, A., Santaniello, D., & Valentino, C. （2023）. Exhibition spaces in the metaverse: A novel design approach. 2023 8th IEEE History of Electrotechnology Conference （HIS℡CON）, 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/HIS℡CON56357.2023.10365847 Chen, C. M., & Huang, M. Y. （2024）. Enhancing programming learning performance through a Jigsaw collaborative learning method in a metaverse virtual space. International Journal of STEM Education, 11（1）, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00495-2 Cheng, A., Ma, D., Pan, Y., & Qian, H. （2024）. Enhancing Museum Visiting Experience: Investigating the Relationships Between Augmented Reality Quality, Immersion, and TAM Using PLS-SEM. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40（17）, 4521–4532. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2227832 Cheung, M. L., Leung, W. K. S., Chang, L. M. K., Aw, E. C.-X., & Wong, R. Y. M. （2024）. Immersive time in the metaverse and visits to the physical world: Why not both? A holistic customer engagement framework. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36（11）, 3674–3703. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2023-0999 Choi, W., Rho, M. J., Park, J., Kim, K.-J., Kwon, Y. D., & Choi, I. Y. （2013）. Information System Success Model for Customer Relationship Management System in Health Promotion Centers. Healthcare Informatics Research, 19（2）, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2013.19.2.110 Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. （1986）. Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, 32（5）, 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 Davis, F. D. （1989）. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13（3）, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 Davis, F. D. （1993）. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38（3）, 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022 De Paolis, L. T., & De Luca, V. （2022）. The effects of touchless interaction on usability and sense of presence in a virtual environment. Virtual Reality, 26（4）, 1551–1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00647-1 DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. （1992）. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3（1）, 60–95. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60 Deng, X., & Yu, Z. （2023）. An extended hedonic motivation adoption model of TikTok in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 28（10）, 13595–13617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11749-x Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. （1998）. Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9（3）, 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256 Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524 Dong. （2021）. Combining cognitive disorder treatment technology with VR technology, opening a new market for game-based mental fitness. Dong-A Business Review. https://dbr.donga.com/article/view/1203/article_no/10188/ac/magazine Duan, H., Li, J., Fan, S., Lin, Z., Wu, X., & Cai, W. （2021）. Metaverse for Social Good: A University Campus Prototype. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474085.3479238 Ertz, M., Jo, M.-S., Kong, Y., & Sarigöllü, E. （2022）. Predicting m-shopping in the two largest m-commerce markets: The United States and China. International Journal of Market Research, 64（2）, 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853211023036 Fokides, E. （2023）. Development and testing of a scale for examining factors affecting the learning experience in the Metaverse. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100025 Forkosh Baruch, A., & Gadot, R. （2021）. Social Curation Experience: Towards Authentic Learning in Preservice Teacher Training. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26（1）, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09449-3 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 Fotakis, T., & Economides, A. A. （2008）. Art, science/technology and history museums on the web. International Journal of Digital Culture and Electronic Tourism, 1（1）, 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDCET.2008.020134 Gadot, R., & Tsybulsky, D. （2023）. Digital Curation as a Pedagogical Approach to Promote Critical Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32（6）, 814–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10016-x Gao, F., & Keller, V. （2024）. The effect of digital curation on visitor behavior in museum expositions. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8（9）. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.6153 Gorsuch, R. L. （1983）. Three methods for analyzing limited time-series （N of 1） data. Behavioral Assessment, 5（2）, 141–154. Gursoy, D., Lu, L., Nunkoo, R., & Deng, D. （2023）. Metaverse in services marketing: An overview and future research directions. The Service Industries Journal, 43（15–16）, 1140–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2252750 Gursoy, D., Malodia, S., & Dhir, A. （2022）. The metaverse in the hospitality and tourism industry: An overview of current trends and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19368623.2022.2072504 Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.): With readings. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson. Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. （2006）. User experience—A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25（2）, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331 He, D., Yao, Z., Tang, P., & Ma, Y. （2023）. Impacts of different interactions on viewers’ sense of virtual community: An empirical study of live streaming platform. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42（7）, 940–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2053884 Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106 Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. SAGE. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Hwang, G.-J., & Chien, S.-Y. （2022）. Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100082 Ibili, E., & Billinghurst, M. （2019）. Assessing the Relationship between Cognitive Load and the Usability of a Mobile Augmented Reality Tutorial System: A Study of Gender Effects. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6（3）, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.594749 Kari, T., & Kosa, M. （2023）. Acceptance and use of virtual reality games: An extension of HMSAM. Virtual Reality, 27（3）, 1585–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00749-4 Kim, H.-C., & Hyun, M. Y. （2016）. Predicting the use of smartphone-based Augmented Reality （AR）: Does telepresence really help? Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.001 Kim, M. J., & Hall, C. M. （2019）. A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: Comparing visitors and non-visitors. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.016 Kim, S. （2018）. Virtual exhibitions and communication factors. Museum Management and Curatorship, 33（3）, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1466190 Kim, S., & Hong, S. （2020）. How Virtual Exhibition Presentation Affects Visitor Communication and Enjoyment: An Exploration of 2D versus 3D. The Design Journal, 23（5）, 677–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1806580 Lee, J. （2022）. A study on the intention and experience of using the metaverse. Jahr : Europski Časopis Za Bioetiku, 13（1）, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.21860/j.13.1.10 Lee, U.-K. （2022）. Tourism Using Virtual Reality: Media Richness and Information System Successes. Sustainability （Switzerland）, 14（7）. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073975 Liu, X., & Zhang, N. （2022）. Interactive Display of Images in Digital Exhibition Halls under Artificial Intelligence and Mixed Reality Technology. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022（1）, 3688797. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3688797 Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. （1997）. At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3（2）, JCMC321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x Lowry, P. B., Gaskin, J., Twyman, N., Hammer, B., & Roberts, T. （2012）. Taking ‘Fun and Games’ Seriously: Proposing the Hedonic-Motivation System Adoption Model （HMSAM） （SSRN Scholarly Paper 2177442）. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2177442 Lowry, P., Gaskin, J., & Moody, G. （2015）. Proposing the Multimotive Information Systems Continuance Model （MISC） to Better Explain End-User System Evaluations and Continuance Intentions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16（7）. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00403 MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5 Montazer, F., & Ahmadi, M. （2024）. Designing Adaptive Interfaces in the Metaverse: Reducing Cognitive Load for Enhanced User Experience. International Journal of Advanced Human Computer Interaction, 2（2）, Article 2. Mystakidis, S. （2022）. Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2（1）, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010031 Pallavicini, F., Pepe, A., Ferrari, A., Garcea, G., Zanacchi, A., & Mantovani, F. （2020）. What Is the Relationship Among Positive Emotions, Sense of Presence, and Ease of Interaction in Virtual Reality Systems? An On-Site Evaluation of a Commercial Virtual Experience. Presence, 27（2）, 183–201. Presence. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00325 Park, S.-H., Mahony, D. F., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. D. （2015）. Curiosity generating advertisements and their impact on sport consumer behavior. Sport Management Review, 18（3）, 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2014.10.002 Park, S.-M., & Kim, Y.-G. （2022）. A Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 4209–4251. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175 Polys, N., Roshan, S., Newton, E., Narula, M., & Thai, B.-T. （2022）. Designing for Social Interactions in a Virtual Art Gallery. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3564533.3564562 Raad, H., & Rashid, F. K. M. （2023）. The Metaverse: Applications, Concerns, Technical Challenges, Future Directions and Recommendations. IEEE Access, 11, 110850–110861. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3321650 Rosenbaum, S. C. （2011）. Curation nation: How to win in a world where consumers are creators : why the future of content is context. McGraw-Hill. https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/-/9780071760393/?ar Schutte, N. S. （2020）. The Impact of Virtual Reality on Curiosity and Other Positive Characteristics. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36（7）, 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1676520 Shi, M., Wang, Q., & Long, Y. （2023）. Exploring the Key Drivers of User Continuance Intention to Use Digital Museums: Evidence From China’s Sanxingdui Museum. IEEE Access, 11, 81511–81526. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3297501 Shin, C., Oh, S., & Jeong, H. （2023）. Extended Reality Platform for Metaverse Exhibition. Journal of Web Engineering, 22（7）, 1055–1073. Journal of Web Engineering. https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2275 Sidek, S. F., Yatim, M. H. M., Ariffin, S. A., & Nurzid, A. （2020）. The Acceptance Factors and Effectiveness of MOOC in the Blended Learning of Computer Architecture and Organization Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8（3）, 909–915. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080323 Stephenson, N. （1992）. Snow Crash. Penguin UK. Sweller, J. （1988）. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12（2）, 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213（88）90023-7 Sweller, J. （2011）. CHAPTER TWO - Cognitive Load Theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross （Eds.）, Psychology of Learning and Motivation （Vol. 55, pp. 37–76）. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8 Sylaiou, S., Dafiotis, P., Koukopoulos, D., Koukoulis, K., Vital, R., Antoniou, A., & Fidas, Chr. （2024）. From physical to virtual art exhibitions and beyond: Survey and some issues for consideration for the metaverse. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 66, 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.11.002 Sylaiou, S., Mania, K., Karoulis, A., & White, M. （2010）. Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68（5）, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.11.002 TREVINO, L. K., LENGEL, R. H., & DAFT, R. L. （1987）. Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. Communication Research, 14（5）, 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005006 Tsai, L.-L. （2022）. Factors That Influence Virtual Tourism Holistic Image: The Moderating Role of Sense of Presence. Sustainability, 14（1）, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010467 Tseng, F.-C., Cheng, T. C. E., Li, K., & Teng, C.-I. （2017）. How does media richness contribute to customer loyalty to mobile instant messaging? Internet Research, 27（3）, 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2016-0181 Tseng, F.-C., Huang, T.-L., Pham, T. T. L., Cheng, T. C. E., & Teng, C.-I. （2022）. How does media richness foster online gamer loyalty? International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102439 Uhm, J.-P., Lee, H.-W., & Han, J.-W. （2020）. Creating sense of presence in a virtual reality experience: Impact on neurophysiological arousal and attitude towards a winter sport. Sport Management Review, 23（4）, 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.10.003 Ullman, J. B. (n.d.). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed., pp. 653–771). Allyn & Bacon. Van der Heijden, H. （2004）. User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 28（4）, 695–704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660 Wang, H., Ning, H., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Dhelim, S., Farha, F., Ding, J., & Daneshmand, M. （2023）. A Survey on the Metaverse: The State-of-the-Art, Technologies, Applications, and Challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10（16）, 14671–14688. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3278329 Wang, M., Lee, J.-Y., & Liu, S. （2022）. The Impact of the User Characteristics of the VR Exhibition on Space Participation and Immersion. International Journal of Contents, 18（1）, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2022.18.1.001 Wang, M., Liu, S., Hu, L., & Lee, J.-Y. （2023）. A Study of Metaverse Exhibition Sustainability on the Perspective of the Experience Economy. Sustainability （Switzerland）, 15（12）. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129153 West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Sage Publications, Inc. What is digital curation? | DCC. （n.d.）. Retrieved March 8, 2025, from https://www.dcc.ac.uk/about/digital-curation William H. Delone, & Ephraim R. McLean. （2003）. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19（4）, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 Wu, Y., Jiang, Q., Liang, H., & Ni, S. （2022）. What Drives Users to Adopt a Digital Museum? A Case of Virtual Exhibition Hall of National Costume Museum. Sage Open, 12（1）, 21582440221082105. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082105 Xi, N., Chen, J., Gama, F., Riar, M., & Hamari, J. （2023）. The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload. Information Systems Frontiers, 25（2）, 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10244-x Xu, J., Liu, S., Yang, W., Fang, M., & Pan, Y. （2024）. Beyond Reality: Exploring User Experiences in the Metaverse Art Exhibition Platform from an Integrated Perspective. Electronics, 13（6）, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13061023 Yakel, E. （2007）. Digital curation. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 23（4）, 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750710831466 Yung, R., Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Potter, L. E. （2021a）. Virtual reality and tourism marketing: Conceptualizing a framework on presence, emotion, and intention. Current Issues in Tourism, 24（11）, 1505–1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1820454 Yung, R., Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Potter, L. E. （2021b）. VR the world: Experimenting with emotion and presence for tourism marketing. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.11.009 Zhao, J., & Yezhova, O. （2024）. STRATEGY OF DESIGN ONLINE MUSEUM EXHIBITION CONTENTS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Art and Design, 2, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2024.2.8 zh_TW
