1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 半導體通路商併購案例研究-以文曄併購Future Electronics為例
Case Study of M&A for a Semiconductor Distributor - WT Acquires Future Electronics
作者 杜雅萱
Tu, Ya-Hsuan
貢獻者 徐政義
Shiu, Cheng-Yi
杜雅萱
Tu, Ya-Hsuan
關鍵詞 企業併購
半導體通路商
事件研究法
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)
Semiconductor distribution
Event Study Method
日期 2025
上傳時間 4-Aug-2025 14:15:37 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以台灣半導體通路商文曄科技於2023年宣布併購加拿大通路商 Future Electronics 為案例，探討企業進行跨國併購之動機、交易結構安排、預期綜效來源與實現程度，並進一步分析交易對市場與公司財務績效之影響。透過文獻回顧，本研究歸納併購成功與否常受併購動機、交易估值、支付工具、產業環境與整合能力等多重因素交互影響。個案方面，文曄採全現金支付，總交易金額高達38億美元，為台灣歷史上最大金額之跨國併購案。財務面則顯示，合併後毛利率由2023年同期之3.03 %提升至2024年第三季之4.19 %，EPS由3.06元成長至5.85元。然而，由於交易所需高額融資，短期內財務費用顯著上升，2023年第三與第四季共提列一次性費用約11.5億元，2024年上半年淨槓桿達3.7倍，資本結構壓力浮現。 在產業層面，合併後市佔率達 12.2%，使其超越傳統領導者 Avnet 與 Arrow，成為全球第一大業者，推升產業集中度，並對供應鏈中之上下游夥伴與競爭者皆產生影響。供應商方面，代表性上游企業博通（Broadcom）在併購後營運績效下滑，可能反映市場預期通路集中度提升後，供應商之議價能力與毛利空間將面臨壓縮風險。本研究發現當併購涉及通路主導權高度集中之產業時，下游客戶對潛在不對稱議價地位之擔憂將更可能反映於股價表現上，與文獻所述客戶受併購影響較不顯著之現象不同。而大聯大作為文曄之主要競爭者，其於公告期間內 CAR 呈現明顯正向，t值接近顯著水準，顯示市場預期效益可能擴張。 整體而言，文曄透過併購有效擴張全球布局，初步實現規模經濟與營運綜效，但財務槓桿與整合風險仍為後續重要觀察重點。本研究期望透過本案，提供半導體產業與其他製造型企業於進行跨國擴張時之策略參考與風險評估依據。
This study examines the case of WT Microelectronics, a Taiwanese semiconductor distributor, which announced its acquisition of Canadian distributor Future Electronics in 2023. It explores the motivations behind cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As), transaction structure, expected sources of synergy, and the degree of synergy realization. The study also analyzes the impact of the transaction on the market and the company’s financial performance. Through literature review, the study finds that the success of M&As is often influenced by multiple interacting factors, including acquisition motives, deal valuation, payment method, industry environment, and integration capabilities. In this case, WT adopted an all-cash payment method, with a total deal value of USD 3.8 billion—making it the largest cross-border acquisition in Taiwan’s history. On the financial side, the company’s gross margin improved from 3.03% in the same period of 2023 to 4.19% in Q3 2024, while EPS increased from NT$3.06 to NT$5.85. However, due to the high financing required for the deal, financial expenses rose significantly in the short term, with a total of NT$1.15 billion in one-off expenses recorded in Q3 and Q4 2023. The net leverage ratio reached 3.7x in the first half of 2024, highlighting mounting pressure on the capital structure. At the industry level, the post-merger market share reached 12.2%, surpassing traditional leaders Avnet and Arrow to become the world’s largest distributor. This consolidation increased industry concentration and impacted both upstream and downstream partners and competitors across the supply chain. For suppliers, Broadcom—a representative upstream firm—experienced a decline in operating performance post-merger, possibly reflecting market expectations that greater channel concentration could erode supplier bargaining power and profit margins. Contrary to prior literature, which suggests customers are less affected by mergers, this study finds that when acquisitions significantly increase channel dominance, downstream customers tend to react more sensitively to potential imbalances in bargaining positions, as reflected in stock price performance. WT’s major competitor, WPG Holdings, showed a significantly positive cumulative abnormal return (CAR) during the announcement window, with a t-statistic near significance, indicating market expectations of potential spillover benefits. Overall, WT successfully expanded its global footprint through the acquisition, achieving preliminary economies of scale and operational synergies. Nevertheless, financial leverage and integration risks remain key concerns going forward. This study aims to provide strategic insights and risk assessment references for firms in the semiconductor sector and other manufacturing-based industries considering cross-border expansion.
參考文獻 Alexandridis, G., Mavrovitis, C. F., & Travlos, N. G. (2013). How have M&As changed? Evidence from the sixth merger wave. European Journal of Finance, 18(8), 663–688. Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1996). Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), 359–399. Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1988). Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1), 3–40. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31. Calipha, R., Tarba, S. Y., & Brock, D. M. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions: A review of phases, motives, and success factors. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 9, 1–24. Campbell, A., & Goold, M. (1998). Synergy: Why links between business units often fail. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 74–82. Cartwright, S., & Schoenberg, R. (2006). Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: Recent advances and future opportunities. British Journal of Management, 17(S1), S1–S5. Datta, D. K. (1991). Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12(4), 281–297. Datta, D. K., & Puia, G. (1995). Cross-border acquisitions: An examination of the influence of relatedness and cultural fit on shareholder value creation in US acquiring firms. Management International Review, 35(4), 337–359. Erel, I., Liao, R. C., & Weisbach, M. S. (2012). Determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 67(3), 1045–1082. Eun, C. S., Kolodny, R., & Scheraga, C. (1996). Cross-border acquisitions and shareholder wealth: Tests of the synergy and internalization hypotheses. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(9), 1559–1582. Faccio, M., & Masulis, R. W. (2005). The choice of payment method in European mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1345–1388. Fee, C. E., & Thomas, S. (2004). Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: Evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(3), 423–460. Finkelstein, S., & Larsson, R. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1–26. Fu, F., Lin, L., & Officer, M. S. (2013). Acquisitions driven by stock overvaluation: Are they good deals? Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 24–39. Hitt, M. A., & Pisano, V. (2003). The cross-border acquisition strategy: A research perspective. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1(2), 133–144. Huang, P., Officer, M. S., & Powell, R. (2016). Method of payment and risk mitigation in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 216–234. Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1–26. Markides, C., & Oyon, D. (1998). International acquisitions: Do they create value for shareholders? European Management Journal, 16(2), 125–135. Shimizu, K., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D., & Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 307–353. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2003). Stock market driven acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(3), 295–311. Wang, D., & Moini, A. H. (2012). Motives for cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Some evidence from Danish firms. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 59–68. 吳安妮（1992）。台灣企業併購動機之實證研究。管理評論，11，1-27。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易學系
112351032
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112351032
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 徐政義zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Shiu, Cheng-Yien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 杜雅萱zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tu, Ya-Hsuanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 杜雅萱zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tu, Ya-Hsuanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2025en_US
dc.date.accessioned 4-Aug-2025 14:15:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 4-Aug-2025 14:15:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Aug-2025 14:15:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0112351032en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158537-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 112351032zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以台灣半導體通路商文曄科技於2023年宣布併購加拿大通路商 Future Electronics 為案例，探討企業進行跨國併購之動機、交易結構安排、預期綜效來源與實現程度，並進一步分析交易對市場與公司財務績效之影響。透過文獻回顧，本研究歸納併購成功與否常受併購動機、交易估值、支付工具、產業環境與整合能力等多重因素交互影響。個案方面，文曄採全現金支付，總交易金額高達38億美元，為台灣歷史上最大金額之跨國併購案。財務面則顯示，合併後毛利率由2023年同期之3.03 %提升至2024年第三季之4.19 %，EPS由3.06元成長至5.85元。然而，由於交易所需高額融資，短期內財務費用顯著上升，2023年第三與第四季共提列一次性費用約11.5億元，2024年上半年淨槓桿達3.7倍，資本結構壓力浮現。 在產業層面，合併後市佔率達 12.2%，使其超越傳統領導者 Avnet 與 Arrow，成為全球第一大業者，推升產業集中度，並對供應鏈中之上下游夥伴與競爭者皆產生影響。供應商方面，代表性上游企業博通（Broadcom）在併購後營運績效下滑，可能反映市場預期通路集中度提升後，供應商之議價能力與毛利空間將面臨壓縮風險。本研究發現當併購涉及通路主導權高度集中之產業時，下游客戶對潛在不對稱議價地位之擔憂將更可能反映於股價表現上，與文獻所述客戶受併購影響較不顯著之現象不同。而大聯大作為文曄之主要競爭者，其於公告期間內 CAR 呈現明顯正向，t值接近顯著水準，顯示市場預期效益可能擴張。 整體而言，文曄透過併購有效擴張全球布局，初步實現規模經濟與營運綜效，但財務槓桿與整合風險仍為後續重要觀察重點。本研究期望透過本案，提供半導體產業與其他製造型企業於進行跨國擴張時之策略參考與風險評估依據。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study examines the case of WT Microelectronics, a Taiwanese semiconductor distributor, which announced its acquisition of Canadian distributor Future Electronics in 2023. It explores the motivations behind cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As), transaction structure, expected sources of synergy, and the degree of synergy realization. The study also analyzes the impact of the transaction on the market and the company’s financial performance. Through literature review, the study finds that the success of M&As is often influenced by multiple interacting factors, including acquisition motives, deal valuation, payment method, industry environment, and integration capabilities. In this case, WT adopted an all-cash payment method, with a total deal value of USD 3.8 billion—making it the largest cross-border acquisition in Taiwan’s history. On the financial side, the company’s gross margin improved from 3.03% in the same period of 2023 to 4.19% in Q3 2024, while EPS increased from NT$3.06 to NT$5.85. However, due to the high financing required for the deal, financial expenses rose significantly in the short term, with a total of NT$1.15 billion in one-off expenses recorded in Q3 and Q4 2023. The net leverage ratio reached 3.7x in the first half of 2024, highlighting mounting pressure on the capital structure. At the industry level, the post-merger market share reached 12.2%, surpassing traditional leaders Avnet and Arrow to become the world’s largest distributor. This consolidation increased industry concentration and impacted both upstream and downstream partners and competitors across the supply chain. For suppliers, Broadcom—a representative upstream firm—experienced a decline in operating performance post-merger, possibly reflecting market expectations that greater channel concentration could erode supplier bargaining power and profit margins. Contrary to prior literature, which suggests customers are less affected by mergers, this study finds that when acquisitions significantly increase channel dominance, downstream customers tend to react more sensitively to potential imbalances in bargaining positions, as reflected in stock price performance. WT’s major competitor, WPG Holdings, showed a significantly positive cumulative abnormal return (CAR) during the announcement window, with a t-statistic near significance, indicating market expectations of potential spillover benefits. Overall, WT successfully expanded its global footprint through the acquisition, achieving preliminary economies of scale and operational synergies. Nevertheless, financial leverage and integration risks remain key concerns going forward. This study aims to provide strategic insights and risk assessment references for firms in the semiconductor sector and other manufacturing-based industries considering cross-border expansion.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論 8 第一節、研究動機與背景 8 第二節、研究目的 10 第三節、研究方法與架構 11 第二章、文獻回顧 12 第一節、企業併購動機 12 第二節、影響併購的因子 12 第三節、併購綜效之探討 15 第四節、評估併購績效之方法 18 第三章、併購交易事件說明 20 第一節、併購交易概述 20 第二節、公司介紹及特性分析 22 第三節、交易特性分析 30 第四章、併購交易環境與綜效分析 33 第一節、外部因子：產業分析及總體經濟 33 第二節、內部因子：個體公司策略分析 40 第三節、預期綜效分析 43 第四節、潛在風險分析 45 第五章、併購交易事後分析 47 第一節、收購方文曄與競爭者之市場反應 47 第二節、文曄上下游之市場反應 51 第三節、購買價格分攤分析 56 第四節、合併後績效分析 60 第五節、合併後對產業影響 71 六、結論 74 參考文獻 75zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2122663 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112351032en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業併購zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 半導體通路商zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 事件研究法zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Semiconductor distributionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Event Study Methoden_US
dc.title (題名) 半導體通路商併購案例研究-以文曄併購Future Electronics為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Case Study of M&A for a Semiconductor Distributor - WT Acquires Future Electronicsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alexandridis, G., Mavrovitis, C. F., & Travlos, N. G. (2013). How have M&As changed? Evidence from the sixth merger wave. European Journal of Finance, 18(8), 663–688. Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1996). Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), 359–399. Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. (1988). Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1), 3–40. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31. Calipha, R., Tarba, S. Y., & Brock, D. M. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions: A review of phases, motives, and success factors. Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 9, 1–24. Campbell, A., & Goold, M. (1998). Synergy: Why links between business units often fail. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 74–82. Cartwright, S., & Schoenberg, R. (2006). Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: Recent advances and future opportunities. British Journal of Management, 17(S1), S1–S5. Datta, D. K. (1991). Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12(4), 281–297. Datta, D. K., & Puia, G. (1995). Cross-border acquisitions: An examination of the influence of relatedness and cultural fit on shareholder value creation in US acquiring firms. Management International Review, 35(4), 337–359. Erel, I., Liao, R. C., & Weisbach, M. S. (2012). Determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 67(3), 1045–1082. Eun, C. S., Kolodny, R., & Scheraga, C. (1996). Cross-border acquisitions and shareholder wealth: Tests of the synergy and internalization hypotheses. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(9), 1559–1582. Faccio, M., & Masulis, R. W. (2005). The choice of payment method in European mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1345–1388. Fee, C. E., & Thomas, S. (2004). Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: Evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(3), 423–460. Finkelstein, S., & Larsson, R. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1–26. Fu, F., Lin, L., & Officer, M. S. (2013). Acquisitions driven by stock overvaluation: Are they good deals? Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 24–39. Hitt, M. A., & Pisano, V. (2003). The cross-border acquisition strategy: A research perspective. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1(2), 133–144. Huang, P., Officer, M. S., & Powell, R. (2016). Method of payment and risk mitigation in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 216–234. Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1–26. Markides, C., & Oyon, D. (1998). International acquisitions: Do they create value for shareholders? European Management Journal, 16(2), 125–135. Shimizu, K., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D., & Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 307–353. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2003). Stock market driven acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(3), 295–311. Wang, D., & Moini, A. H. (2012). Motives for cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Some evidence from Danish firms. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 59–68. 吳安妮（1992）。台灣企業併購動機之實證研究。管理評論，11，1-27。zh_TW