1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Liberal Arts
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 臺灣監獄圖書館對於收容人之服務與使用意見分析
The Analysis on Inmate Services and Usage Opinion of Prison Libraries in Taiwan
作者 張慧婷
Chang, Hui-Ting
貢獻者 林巧敏
Lin, Chiao-Min
張慧婷
Chang, Hui-Ting
關鍵詞 監獄圖書館
收容人
矯正教育
閱讀服務
再犯預防
Prison Libraries
Inmates
Correctional Education
Reading Services
Recidivism Prevention
日期 2025
上傳時間 1-Sep-2025 14:28:55 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以臺灣監獄圖書館為研究對象，探討其對收容人所提供之服務內容與實際使用情形。研究目的在於瞭解監獄圖書館的館藏資源、閱覽服務與推廣活動現況，分析收容人對圖書館服務的意見與感受，並檢視管理人員的服務理念及其角色實踐，以作為未來監獄圖書館發展之參考。 研究方法採質性研究，透過半結構式訪談蒐集資料，訪談對象包含監獄圖書館管理員與收容人。研究結果顯示：一、監獄圖書館在經費、人力與館藏資源方面普遍不足，致使服務效能受限；二、部分監獄透過與公共圖書館及外部團體合作，補充館藏資源並推動多元閱讀活動，展現正向成效；三、收容人普遍認為圖書館能提供精神慰藉與知識學習機會，協助其培養閱讀習慣與專業技能，減緩監禁壓力並促進自我成長；四、圖書館管理員在服務理念上多強調「教育輔助」與「人性關懷」，但在執行上仍受制度規範與資源限制影響。 最後，監獄圖書館不僅是知識與教育的重要載體，也是收容人心靈支持與社會復歸的關鍵資源。研究建議政府應重視監獄圖書館發展，增加經費與專業人力編制，並建立制度化的服務規範，同時加強與公共圖書館及外部資源合作，以提升服務品質與持續性。未來研究可進一步擴大樣本，進行跨國比較與縱向追蹤，以更全面地呈現監獄圖書館在矯正教育及再犯預防上的影響。
This study focuses on prison libraries in Taiwan and investigates the services they provide to inmates and how these services are utilized. The main objectives are to examine the current status of collections, reading services, and promotional activities in prison libraries; to analyze inmates’ opinions and experiences; and to explore the service concepts and role practices of library managers. The findings are expected to provide reference for future development of prison library services in Taiwan. A qualitative research method was adopted, using semi-structured interviews with both prison library managers and inmates. The results reveal several key findings: (1) Most prison libraries face challenges of insufficient funding, limited staffing, and outdated or inadequate collections, which restrict service effectiveness. (2) Some prisons have successfully collaborated with public libraries and external organizations to supplement resources and implement diverse reading programs. (3) Inmates generally perceive prison libraries as important sources of emotional comfort, knowledge, and learning opportunities that help cultivate reading habits, develop skills, relieve the stress of incarceration, and support self-growth. (4) While library managers emphasize educational support and humanistic care in their service philosophy, their practices remain constrained by institutional rules and limited resources. In conclusion, prison libraries are not only crucial for knowledge and educational support but also serve as essential resources for inmates’ psychological well-being and social reintegration. The study suggests that the government should strengthen policy frameworks, allocate more funding and professional staff, and establish standardized service guidelines. Furthermore, enhancing collaborations with public libraries and external organizations will help improve service quality and sustainability. Future research is recommended to expand the sample size, conduct cross-national comparisons, and carry out longitudinal studies to better understand the role of prison libraries in correctional education and recidivism prevention.
參考文獻 Becker, Gary S.(1968).“Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,” Journal of Political Economy, 76(2): 169-217 Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row. Conrad, S. (2016). Prison librarianship policy and practice. McFarland & Company. Erlend R. Prison libraries in Norway [J](2006). IFLA Libraries Serving Disadvantaged Person Section Newsletter, 2006(12): 8-10 Garner, J. (2017). Experiencing the Use of Australian Prison Libraries: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 66(2), 170–171. Garner, J. (2023). Planning and evaluating prison library services: Strategies and outcomes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(1), 12-34. Gourlay, L. (2016). There is no ‘virtual learning’: The materiality of digital education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(1), 57–64. Hussain, S. T., Batool, S. H., Rehman, A. U., Zahra, S. K., & Mahmood, K. (2022). Examining the status of prison libraries around the world: A literature review. IFLA Journal, 03400352221078032. InsideOUT Writers：https://www.insideoutwriters.org/ Knudson, F. (2012). Connecting prison libraries with reentry services: A strategy for success. Library Trends, 59(3), 492–508. Lehmann, V. (2011). Challenges and Accomplishments in U.S. Prison Libraries. Library Trends, 59(3), 490–508. doi:10.1353/lib.2011.0001 10.1353/lib.2011.0001 Ljødal & Ra.(2011) Prison Libraries the Scandinavian Way: An Overview of the Development and Operation of Prison Library Services. Library Trends 59(3), 473-489. Minichiello, Victor. (1995). In-Depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis. Sydney, Australia: Pearson Education Australia. Nakane, K., & Noguchi, S. (2011). “Prison Libraries” in Japan: The Current Situation of Access to Books and Reading in Correctional Institutions. Library Trends, 59(3), 446–459. Peschers, G. (2021), “Books Open Worlds for People Behind Bars: Library Services in Germany’s Prisons Ranging from Local Best Practice Examples and Regional Experiences in North Rhine-Westphalia to Steadily Growing Internationality*", Garner, J. (Ed.) Exploring the Roles and Practices of Libraries in Prisons: International Perspectives (Advances in Librarianship, Vol. 49), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley,pp.227-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0065-283020210000049012 Peschers, G., & Patterson, A. (2011). “Books Open Worlds for People Behind Bars: Library Services in Prison as Exemplified by the Münster Prison Library, Germany's “Library of the Year 2007”. Library Trends, 59(3), 520-543. Rubin, R. J. (1983). Keeping professional librarians in prison; or, The problems of professionalism in prison libraries. RQ, 23(1), 40-46. Rubin, R. J., & Souza, S. J. (1989). The Challenge Continues: Prison Librarianship in the 1980s. Library journal, 114(4), 47-51. Šimunić、Tanacković & Badurina. Library services for incarcerated persons: A survey of recent trends and challenges in prison libraries in Croatia. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 48(1):72-89. Stearns, R. M. (2004). The Prison Library. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 23(1), 49–80. doi:10.1300/j103v23n01_03 Stout, J.& Turitz, G. (1977) ‘Outside … looking in’, Wilson Library Bulletin, 2, 499–505. Sussman, S. (2021). Addiction, stigma, and neurodiversity. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 44(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787211009447 Wilkins, B. (1977) The correctional facility library: History and standards. Library Trends, 26(1), 119–123. 王佑瑄（2014）。矯正機構圖書館使用與收容人需求研究。未出版之碩士論文， 國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。 王岫(2013)。《給受刑人的美麗小禮物：讀意外的管書人生：監獄圖書館員歷險記》。全國新書月刊，第180期，33-36。 中華民國法務部。取自https://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/RJSDWeb/common/WebList3_Report.aspx?list_id=1218 世界人權宣言。(2022)取自https://www.6laws.net/6law/law2/世界人權宣言.htm 阮一峰（2022）。圖書館的世界紀錄 。取自http://www. ruanyifeng. com/blog/2009/09/library_world_ records. html. 吳忠躍（2020）。國內外監獄圖書館建設研究。圖書館與文化研究，2(1), 86-89。 李英對、潘佩瑜(2020)。〈數位關懷、行動圖書~書香傳愛「前進臺南第二監獄」〉。公共圖書館研究，第11 期，170-173。 英國圖書館與資訊委員會。（2022）取自https://www.ntl.edu.tw/public/Attachment/992518403564.pdf 林金定, 嚴嘉楓, & 陳美花 (2005)。 質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析。 身心障礙研究， 3(2)， 122-136。 林文睿（1997）。臺灣圖書館事業之現況與遭遇的困難--公共圖書館。中國圖書館學會會報，59-61 陳佳莉、陳雪華 (2019)。 臺灣監獄圖書館服務之研究。公共圖書館研究，第 11 期， 1-41。 陳書梅(2008)。閱讀與情緒療癒淺談書目療法。全國新書資訊月刊。 陳昭珍(2003)。公共圖書館與閱讀活動。臺北市立圖書館館訊，20(4) ， 47 – 59。 陳奕璁（2008）。高等教育與犯罪率--台灣實證研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。 孫會清 (2016)。德國明斯特監獄圖書館服務。圖書館論壇, 36(5), 129-134. 孫義雄（2015）。理性抉擇理論在觀光博弈產業地區治安管理策略中的應用。警察行政管理學報，11，59-73 張齊家（2004）。青少年收容人圖書資訊利用與讀書會參與之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。 張曉玲(2020)發表〈用閱讀帶給收容人愛與溫暖-臺中市立圖書館與矯正機構合作經驗〉。公共圖書館研究，11，136-150。 黃瑞汝（2001）。臺灣地區監院所讀書會發展與運作模式之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所，嘉義縣。 劉甲庫(2013)。美國、挪威、日本監獄圖書館比較研究與借鑒。圖書情報工作，57 (19): 81-86。 鄭嘉雯（2020）。淺談國立臺灣圖書館「飛越高牆用閱讀點亮世界的美好-送給隨母入監孩子第一份閱讀禮」計畫。公共圖書館研究，11，113-135。 盧秀菊(2006)。我國公共圖書館營運基準與績效評量指標。圖書與資訊學刊，56期， 1 – 22 蘇士雅、梁鴻栩(2018)。書香飄進矯正機關帶收容人迎向希望曙光。國立公共資訊圖書館。 https://www.nlpi.edu.tw/FileDownLoad/LibraryPublication/20180522114856856274815.pdf
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
110155027
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110155027
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林巧敏zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Lin, Chiao-Minen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張慧婷zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chang, Hui-Tingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 張慧婷zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chang, Hui-Tingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2025en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Sep-2025 14:28:55 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Sep-2025 14:28:55 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Sep-2025 14:28:55 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0110155027en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158953-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 110155027zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以臺灣監獄圖書館為研究對象，探討其對收容人所提供之服務內容與實際使用情形。研究目的在於瞭解監獄圖書館的館藏資源、閱覽服務與推廣活動現況，分析收容人對圖書館服務的意見與感受，並檢視管理人員的服務理念及其角色實踐，以作為未來監獄圖書館發展之參考。 研究方法採質性研究，透過半結構式訪談蒐集資料，訪談對象包含監獄圖書館管理員與收容人。研究結果顯示：一、監獄圖書館在經費、人力與館藏資源方面普遍不足，致使服務效能受限；二、部分監獄透過與公共圖書館及外部團體合作，補充館藏資源並推動多元閱讀活動，展現正向成效；三、收容人普遍認為圖書館能提供精神慰藉與知識學習機會，協助其培養閱讀習慣與專業技能，減緩監禁壓力並促進自我成長；四、圖書館管理員在服務理念上多強調「教育輔助」與「人性關懷」，但在執行上仍受制度規範與資源限制影響。 最後，監獄圖書館不僅是知識與教育的重要載體，也是收容人心靈支持與社會復歸的關鍵資源。研究建議政府應重視監獄圖書館發展，增加經費與專業人力編制，並建立制度化的服務規範，同時加強與公共圖書館及外部資源合作，以提升服務品質與持續性。未來研究可進一步擴大樣本，進行跨國比較與縱向追蹤，以更全面地呈現監獄圖書館在矯正教育及再犯預防上的影響。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study focuses on prison libraries in Taiwan and investigates the services they provide to inmates and how these services are utilized. The main objectives are to examine the current status of collections, reading services, and promotional activities in prison libraries; to analyze inmates’ opinions and experiences; and to explore the service concepts and role practices of library managers. The findings are expected to provide reference for future development of prison library services in Taiwan. A qualitative research method was adopted, using semi-structured interviews with both prison library managers and inmates. The results reveal several key findings: (1) Most prison libraries face challenges of insufficient funding, limited staffing, and outdated or inadequate collections, which restrict service effectiveness. (2) Some prisons have successfully collaborated with public libraries and external organizations to supplement resources and implement diverse reading programs. (3) Inmates generally perceive prison libraries as important sources of emotional comfort, knowledge, and learning opportunities that help cultivate reading habits, develop skills, relieve the stress of incarceration, and support self-growth. (4) While library managers emphasize educational support and humanistic care in their service philosophy, their practices remain constrained by institutional rules and limited resources. In conclusion, prison libraries are not only crucial for knowledge and educational support but also serve as essential resources for inmates’ psychological well-being and social reintegration. The study suggests that the government should strengthen policy frameworks, allocate more funding and professional staff, and establish standardized service guidelines. Furthermore, enhancing collaborations with public libraries and external organizations will help improve service quality and sustainability. Future research is recommended to expand the sample size, conduct cross-national comparisons, and carry out longitudinal studies to better understand the role of prison libraries in correctional education and recidivism prevention.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第三節 研究範圍與限制 4 第四節 名詞解釋 7 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 國內外監獄圖書館發展與現況 9 第二節 監獄圖書館服務內容 22 第三節 監獄圖書館對收容人的影響 30 第三章 研究設計與實施 41 第一節 研究架構 41 第二節 研究方法 42 第三節 研究工具 44 第四節 研究對象 45 第五節 研究流程 47 第六節 資料處理與分析 49 第四章 研究結果與分析 51 第一節 圖書館服務現況之探討 51 第二節 管理人員服務理念與角色實踐 71 第三節 收容人對監獄圖書館服務之經驗與感受 76 第四節 收容人與管理人員的服務互動與反饋機制 86 第五節 圖書館服務的外部資源與合作模式 90 第六節 監獄圖書館運作之挑戰與限制 93 第五章 結論與建議 103 第一節 結論 103 第二節 建議 107 第三節 未來研究建議 114 參考文獻 117 附錄一 獄圖書館訪談邀請信 121 附錄二 訪談知情同意書 122 附錄三 監獄圖書館訪談大綱（監獄圖書館管理員版） 123 附錄四 監獄圖書館訪談大綱（收容人版） 124zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2491271 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110155027en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 監獄圖書館zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 收容人zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 矯正教育zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閱讀服務zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 再犯預防zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Prison Librariesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Inmatesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Correctional Educationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Reading Servicesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Recidivism Preventionen_US
dc.title (題名) 臺灣監獄圖書館對於收容人之服務與使用意見分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Analysis on Inmate Services and Usage Opinion of Prison Libraries in Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Becker, Gary S.(1968).“Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,” Journal of Political Economy, 76(2): 169-217 Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row. Conrad, S. (2016). Prison librarianship policy and practice. McFarland & Company. Erlend R. Prison libraries in Norway [J](2006). IFLA Libraries Serving Disadvantaged Person Section Newsletter, 2006(12): 8-10 Garner, J. (2017). Experiencing the Use of Australian Prison Libraries: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 66(2), 170–171. Garner, J. (2023). Planning and evaluating prison library services: Strategies and outcomes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(1), 12-34. Gourlay, L. (2016). There is no ‘virtual learning’: The materiality of digital education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(1), 57–64. Hussain, S. T., Batool, S. H., Rehman, A. U., Zahra, S. K., & Mahmood, K. (2022). Examining the status of prison libraries around the world: A literature review. IFLA Journal, 03400352221078032. InsideOUT Writers：https://www.insideoutwriters.org/ Knudson, F. (2012). Connecting prison libraries with reentry services: A strategy for success. Library Trends, 59(3), 492–508. Lehmann, V. (2011). Challenges and Accomplishments in U.S. Prison Libraries. Library Trends, 59(3), 490–508. doi:10.1353/lib.2011.0001 10.1353/lib.2011.0001 Ljødal & Ra.(2011) Prison Libraries the Scandinavian Way: An Overview of the Development and Operation of Prison Library Services. Library Trends 59(3), 473-489. Minichiello, Victor. (1995). In-Depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis. Sydney, Australia: Pearson Education Australia. Nakane, K., & Noguchi, S. (2011). “Prison Libraries” in Japan: The Current Situation of Access to Books and Reading in Correctional Institutions. Library Trends, 59(3), 446–459. Peschers, G. (2021), “Books Open Worlds for People Behind Bars: Library Services in Germany’s Prisons Ranging from Local Best Practice Examples and Regional Experiences in North Rhine-Westphalia to Steadily Growing Internationality*", Garner, J. (Ed.) Exploring the Roles and Practices of Libraries in Prisons: International Perspectives (Advances in Librarianship, Vol. 49), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley,pp.227-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0065-283020210000049012 Peschers, G., & Patterson, A. (2011). “Books Open Worlds for People Behind Bars: Library Services in Prison as Exemplified by the Münster Prison Library, Germany's “Library of the Year 2007”. Library Trends, 59(3), 520-543. Rubin, R. J. (1983). Keeping professional librarians in prison; or, The problems of professionalism in prison libraries. RQ, 23(1), 40-46. Rubin, R. J., & Souza, S. J. (1989). The Challenge Continues: Prison Librarianship in the 1980s. Library journal, 114(4), 47-51. Šimunić、Tanacković & Badurina. Library services for incarcerated persons: A survey of recent trends and challenges in prison libraries in Croatia. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 48(1):72-89. Stearns, R. M. (2004). The Prison Library. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 23(1), 49–80. doi:10.1300/j103v23n01_03 Stout, J.& Turitz, G. (1977) ‘Outside … looking in’, Wilson Library Bulletin, 2, 499–505. Sussman, S. (2021). Addiction, stigma, and neurodiversity. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 44(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787211009447 Wilkins, B. (1977) The correctional facility library: History and standards. Library Trends, 26(1), 119–123. 王佑瑄（2014）。矯正機構圖書館使用與收容人需求研究。未出版之碩士論文， 國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。 王岫(2013)。《給受刑人的美麗小禮物：讀意外的管書人生：監獄圖書館員歷險記》。全國新書月刊，第180期，33-36。 中華民國法務部。取自https://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/RJSDWeb/common/WebList3_Report.aspx?list_id=1218 世界人權宣言。(2022)取自https://www.6laws.net/6law/law2/世界人權宣言.htm 阮一峰（2022）。圖書館的世界紀錄 。取自http://www. ruanyifeng. com/blog/2009/09/library_world_ records. html. 吳忠躍（2020）。國內外監獄圖書館建設研究。圖書館與文化研究，2(1), 86-89。 李英對、潘佩瑜(2020)。〈數位關懷、行動圖書~書香傳愛「前進臺南第二監獄」〉。公共圖書館研究，第11 期，170-173。 英國圖書館與資訊委員會。（2022）取自https://www.ntl.edu.tw/public/Attachment/992518403564.pdf 林金定, 嚴嘉楓, & 陳美花 (2005)。 質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析。 身心障礙研究， 3(2)， 122-136。 林文睿（1997）。臺灣圖書館事業之現況與遭遇的困難--公共圖書館。中國圖書館學會會報，59-61 陳佳莉、陳雪華 (2019)。 臺灣監獄圖書館服務之研究。公共圖書館研究，第 11 期， 1-41。 陳書梅(2008)。閱讀與情緒療癒淺談書目療法。全國新書資訊月刊。 陳昭珍(2003)。公共圖書館與閱讀活動。臺北市立圖書館館訊，20(4) ， 47 – 59。 陳奕璁（2008）。高等教育與犯罪率--台灣實證研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。 孫會清 (2016)。德國明斯特監獄圖書館服務。圖書館論壇, 36(5), 129-134. 孫義雄（2015）。理性抉擇理論在觀光博弈產業地區治安管理策略中的應用。警察行政管理學報，11，59-73 張齊家（2004）。青少年收容人圖書資訊利用與讀書會參與之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。 張曉玲(2020)發表〈用閱讀帶給收容人愛與溫暖-臺中市立圖書館與矯正機構合作經驗〉。公共圖書館研究，11，136-150。 黃瑞汝（2001）。臺灣地區監院所讀書會發展與運作模式之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所，嘉義縣。 劉甲庫(2013)。美國、挪威、日本監獄圖書館比較研究與借鑒。圖書情報工作，57 (19): 81-86。 鄭嘉雯（2020）。淺談國立臺灣圖書館「飛越高牆用閱讀點亮世界的美好-送給隨母入監孩子第一份閱讀禮」計畫。公共圖書館研究，11，113-135。 盧秀菊(2006)。我國公共圖書館營運基準與績效評量指標。圖書與資訊學刊，56期， 1 – 22 蘇士雅、梁鴻栩(2018)。書香飄進矯正機關帶收容人迎向希望曙光。國立公共資訊圖書館。 https://www.nlpi.edu.tw/FileDownLoad/LibraryPublication/20180522114856856274815.pdfzh_TW