1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 漢娜．鄂蘭的政治思想與當代人權概念
Hannah Arendt’s Political Philosophy and The Contemporary Concept of Human Rights
作者 何育睿
Ho, Yu Jui
貢獻者 葉浩
Yeh, Hao
何育睿
Ho, Yu Jui
關鍵詞 漢娜．鄂蘭
人權
擁有權利的權利
共同世界
愛世界
社會契約論
自由觀
Hannah Arendt
Human rights
A right to have rights
Common world
Amor mundi
Social contract
Freedom
日期 2025
上傳時間 1-Sep-2025 15:28:37 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文旨在探討漢娜．鄂蘭的政治思想對於當代人權概念的啟發。透過對於當代人權概念幾個主要理論困境的分析，本文發現當代人權概念深植於社會契約論的傳統之中，並主張契約論預設的「個人主義式自由觀」以及「主權政治架構」—也就是鄂蘭所謂「垂直社會契約」架構，是導致當代人權概念無法實現其自身期待的根本原因。本文以鄂蘭「政治本體論」的視角重新詮釋「擁有權利的權利」概念，認為唯有透過恢復「共同世界」作為人言說與行動的重要場所、重拾人作為「政治行動者」的能動性，人權概念賴以建立的「本體論基礎」才有被重建的可能性。據此，本文主張以「愛世界（amor mundi）」作為觀看並與世界互動的根本態度，才是確保當代人權概念得以實踐其自身的重要基礎。
This thesis investigates the theoretical dilemmas surrounding the contemporary concept of human rights and seeks to reconstruct a so-called “ontological foundation” through Hannah Arendt’s notion of “the right to have rights.” It argues that modern human rights discourse is deeply shaped by the tradition of social contract theory, which presupposes an individualistic conception of freedom and a sovereign-centric political framework. These presuppositions result in a conceptual deadlock between what human right claims itself could achieve and what it actually achieves. The thesis contends that Arendt’s idea of “the right to have rights” is not merely a political appeal for stateless individuals but an ontological proposition that underscores the necessity of a “common world” wherein human dignity and freedom are manifested through action and speech. Through revisiting Arendt’s political ontology, this study demonstrates that human rights are only practicable when the conditions for political agency and intersubjective worldliness are restored. Ultimately, the thesis asserts that beyond legal and institutional design, it is the way individuals relate to the world and others—an attitude of “amor mundi”—that enables the meaningful realization of human rights today.
參考文獻 西文參考資料： Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future : six exercises in political thought. New York: Viking Press. Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Arendt, H. (1973). The Origin of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. Arendt, H. (1981). The Life of the Mind, One Volume Edition. New York: Mariner Books. Arendt, H. (1990). Philosophy and Politics. Social Research, 57(1), pp. 73-103. Arendt, H. (1994). Essays in understanding, 1930-1954 : formation, exile, and totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books. Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Benhabib, S. (2004). “The right to have rights”: Hannah Arendt on the contradictions of the nation-state. In S. Benhabib, The Rights of Others Aliens, Residents, and Citizens (pp. 49-70). Connecticut: Cambridge University Press. Berkowitz, R. (2011). Hannah Arendt on human rights. In T. Cushman, Handbook of Human Rights (pp. 59-67). New York: Routledge. Biggar, N. (2020). What's wrong with rights? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Birmingham, P. (2006). Hannah Arendt and Human Rights: The Predicament of Common Responsibility. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Blitz, B. K. (2017). The state and the stateless: The legacy of Hannah Arendt reconsidered. In T. Bloom, K. Tonkiss, & P. Cole, Understanding Statelessness (pp. 70-84). London: Routledge. Chiba, S. (1995, Summer). Hannah Arendt on Love and the Political: Love, Friendship, and Citizenship. The Review of Politics, pp. 505-535. Cotter, B. (2005). Hannah Arendt and “the Right to Have Rights”. In A. F. Lang, & J. Williams, Hannah Arendt and International Relations (pp. 95-112). New York: Palgrave Macmillan New York. DeGooyer, S., Hunt, A., Maxwell, L., Moyn, S., & Taylor, A. (2018). The Right to Have Rights. New York: Verso. Ferguson, L. (2022). From Love to Care: Arendt’s Amor Mundi in the Ethical Turn. Political Theory, 50(6), pp. 939-963. Gündoğdu, A. (2014). Statelessness and the right to have rights. In P. Hayden, Hannah Arendt Key Concepts. New York: Routledge. Gündoğdu, A. (2015). Rightlessness in an Age of Rights: Hannah Arendt and the Contemporary Struggles of Migrants. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Griffin, J. (2008). On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Heuser, S. (2008, July 5). Is There a Right to Have Rights? The Case of the Right of Asylum. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11, pp. 3-13. Hirsch, A. L., & Nathan , B. (2017, September 10). The Right to Have Rights as a Right to Enter: Addressing a Lacuna in the International Refugee Protection Regime. Human Rights Review, 18, pp. 417-437. Hiruta, K. (2019). Hannah Arendt, Liberalism, and Freedom from Politics. In K. Hiruta, Arendt on Freedom, Liberation, and Revolution (pp. 17-45). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Kiess, J. (2016). Hannah Arendt and Theology. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark. Mrovlje, M. (2014). Narrating and understanding. In P. Hayden, Hannah Arendt Key Concepts (pp. 66-84). London: Routledge. Mullhall, S., & Swift, A. (1996). Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell;. Nickel, J. W. (2012, 7). Reviewed Work: On Human Rights by James Griffin. The Philosophical Review, pp. 461-464. Parekh, S. (2004). A meaningful place in the world: Hannah Arendt on the nature of human rights. Journal of Human Rights, 3(1), pp. 41-52. Parekh, S. (2008). Hannah Arendt and the challenge of modernity : a phenomenology of human rights. New York: Routledge. Peeters, R. (2009, September). Truth, Meaning and the Common World: The Significance and Meaning of Common Sense in Hannah Arendt’s Thought. Ethical Perspectives, 16(3), pp. 337-359. Roessler, J. (2022, November 3). The Concept of World Alienation in Hannah Arendt. Arendt Study, 7, pp. 139-163. Smith, W., & Zhang , S. (2019). Resisting Injustice: Arendt on Civil Disobedience and the Social Contract. In K. Hiruta, Arendt on Freedom, Liberation, and Revolution (pp. 115–138). London: Palgrave MacMillan. Taraborrelli, A. (2024). Hannah Arendt and Cosmopolitanism. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Tasioulas, J. (2007). The Moral Reality of Human Rights. In T. Pogg, Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor? (pp. 75-101). New York: Oxford University Press. VOLLRATH, E., & Fantel, H. (1977, Spring). Hannah Arendt and the Method of Political Thinking. Social Research, pp. 106-182. 中文參考資料： 鄂蘭漢娜. (2021). 過去與未來之間：政治思考的八場習練. 台北市: 商周出版. 鄂蘭漢娜. (2022). 極權主義的起源. 台北市: 商周出版. 葛里芬詹姆士. (2015). 論人權. 南京市: 譯林出版社.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
110252018
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110252018
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 葉浩zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yeh, Haoen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 何育睿zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Ho, Yu Juien_US
dc.creator (作者) 何育睿zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Ho, Yu Juien_US
dc.date (日期) 2025en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Sep-2025 15:28:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Sep-2025 15:28:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Sep-2025 15:28:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0110252018en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159171-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 政治學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 110252018zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文旨在探討漢娜．鄂蘭的政治思想對於當代人權概念的啟發。透過對於當代人權概念幾個主要理論困境的分析，本文發現當代人權概念深植於社會契約論的傳統之中，並主張契約論預設的「個人主義式自由觀」以及「主權政治架構」—也就是鄂蘭所謂「垂直社會契約」架構，是導致當代人權概念無法實現其自身期待的根本原因。本文以鄂蘭「政治本體論」的視角重新詮釋「擁有權利的權利」概念，認為唯有透過恢復「共同世界」作為人言說與行動的重要場所、重拾人作為「政治行動者」的能動性，人權概念賴以建立的「本體論基礎」才有被重建的可能性。據此，本文主張以「愛世界（amor mundi）」作為觀看並與世界互動的根本態度，才是確保當代人權概念得以實踐其自身的重要基礎。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis investigates the theoretical dilemmas surrounding the contemporary concept of human rights and seeks to reconstruct a so-called “ontological foundation” through Hannah Arendt’s notion of “the right to have rights.” It argues that modern human rights discourse is deeply shaped by the tradition of social contract theory, which presupposes an individualistic conception of freedom and a sovereign-centric political framework. These presuppositions result in a conceptual deadlock between what human right claims itself could achieve and what it actually achieves. The thesis contends that Arendt’s idea of “the right to have rights” is not merely a political appeal for stateless individuals but an ontological proposition that underscores the necessity of a “common world” wherein human dignity and freedom are manifested through action and speech. Through revisiting Arendt’s political ontology, this study demonstrates that human rights are only practicable when the conditions for political agency and intersubjective worldliness are restored. Ultimately, the thesis asserts that beyond legal and institutional design, it is the way individuals relate to the world and others—an attitude of “amor mundi”—that enables the meaningful realization of human rights today.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 前言 1 第二節 鄂蘭如何看待政治問題 2 第三節 文獻回顧 5 第四節 以「擁有權利的權利」重看「世界」 8 第五節 章節安排 11 第二章 當代人權概念 12 第一節 當代人權概念之模糊性問題 12 第二節 社會經濟權之爭議 15 第三章 人權、主權與自由之間的關係 17 第一節 鄂蘭與社會契約論 17 第二節 人權與主權之內在矛盾 21 第三節 兩種自由觀—古希臘與當代 24 第四章 《人的條件》對於當代人權概念困境之描述 28 第一節 人的條件 28 第二節 現代性精神氣質 31 第三節 現代性與當代人權概念 35 第五章 漢娜．鄂蘭的政治觀 38 第一節 共同世界 38 第二節 非世界性與世界異化 42 第三節 愛世界 45 第六章 結論 48 第一節 「擁有權利的權利」與鄂蘭的政治本體論 49 第二節 「擁有權利的權利」之當代意義 52 書目 55zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1888647 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110252018en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 漢娜．鄂蘭zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 擁有權利的權利zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共同世界zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 愛世界zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會契約論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自由觀zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hannah Arendten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Human rightsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) A right to have rightsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Common worlden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Amor mundien_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social contracten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Freedomen_US
dc.title (題名) 漢娜．鄂蘭的政治思想與當代人權概念zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Hannah Arendt’s Political Philosophy and The Contemporary Concept of Human Rightsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 西文參考資料： Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future : six exercises in political thought. New York: Viking Press. Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Arendt, H. (1973). The Origin of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. Arendt, H. (1981). The Life of the Mind, One Volume Edition. New York: Mariner Books. Arendt, H. (1990). Philosophy and Politics. Social Research, 57(1), pp. 73-103. Arendt, H. (1994). Essays in understanding, 1930-1954 : formation, exile, and totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books. Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Benhabib, S. (2004). “The right to have rights”: Hannah Arendt on the contradictions of the nation-state. In S. Benhabib, The Rights of Others Aliens, Residents, and Citizens (pp. 49-70). Connecticut: Cambridge University Press. Berkowitz, R. (2011). Hannah Arendt on human rights. In T. Cushman, Handbook of Human Rights (pp. 59-67). New York: Routledge. Biggar, N. (2020). What's wrong with rights? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Birmingham, P. (2006). Hannah Arendt and Human Rights: The Predicament of Common Responsibility. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Blitz, B. K. (2017). The state and the stateless: The legacy of Hannah Arendt reconsidered. In T. Bloom, K. Tonkiss, & P. Cole, Understanding Statelessness (pp. 70-84). London: Routledge. Chiba, S. (1995, Summer). Hannah Arendt on Love and the Political: Love, Friendship, and Citizenship. The Review of Politics, pp. 505-535. Cotter, B. (2005). Hannah Arendt and “the Right to Have Rights”. In A. F. Lang, & J. Williams, Hannah Arendt and International Relations (pp. 95-112). New York: Palgrave Macmillan New York. DeGooyer, S., Hunt, A., Maxwell, L., Moyn, S., & Taylor, A. (2018). The Right to Have Rights. New York: Verso. Ferguson, L. (2022). From Love to Care: Arendt’s Amor Mundi in the Ethical Turn. Political Theory, 50(6), pp. 939-963. Gündoğdu, A. (2014). Statelessness and the right to have rights. In P. Hayden, Hannah Arendt Key Concepts. New York: Routledge. Gündoğdu, A. (2015). Rightlessness in an Age of Rights: Hannah Arendt and the Contemporary Struggles of Migrants. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Griffin, J. (2008). On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Heuser, S. (2008, July 5). Is There a Right to Have Rights? The Case of the Right of Asylum. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11, pp. 3-13. Hirsch, A. L., & Nathan , B. (2017, September 10). The Right to Have Rights as a Right to Enter: Addressing a Lacuna in the International Refugee Protection Regime. Human Rights Review, 18, pp. 417-437. Hiruta, K. (2019). Hannah Arendt, Liberalism, and Freedom from Politics. In K. Hiruta, Arendt on Freedom, Liberation, and Revolution (pp. 17-45). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Kiess, J. (2016). Hannah Arendt and Theology. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark. Mrovlje, M. (2014). Narrating and understanding. In P. Hayden, Hannah Arendt Key Concepts (pp. 66-84). London: Routledge. Mullhall, S., & Swift, A. (1996). Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell;. Nickel, J. W. (2012, 7). Reviewed Work: On Human Rights by James Griffin. The Philosophical Review, pp. 461-464. Parekh, S. (2004). A meaningful place in the world: Hannah Arendt on the nature of human rights. Journal of Human Rights, 3(1), pp. 41-52. Parekh, S. (2008). Hannah Arendt and the challenge of modernity : a phenomenology of human rights. New York: Routledge. Peeters, R. (2009, September). Truth, Meaning and the Common World: The Significance and Meaning of Common Sense in Hannah Arendt’s Thought. Ethical Perspectives, 16(3), pp. 337-359. Roessler, J. (2022, November 3). The Concept of World Alienation in Hannah Arendt. Arendt Study, 7, pp. 139-163. Smith, W., & Zhang , S. (2019). Resisting Injustice: Arendt on Civil Disobedience and the Social Contract. In K. Hiruta, Arendt on Freedom, Liberation, and Revolution (pp. 115–138). London: Palgrave MacMillan. Taraborrelli, A. (2024). Hannah Arendt and Cosmopolitanism. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Tasioulas, J. (2007). The Moral Reality of Human Rights. In T. Pogg, Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor? (pp. 75-101). New York: Oxford University Press. VOLLRATH, E., & Fantel, H. (1977, Spring). Hannah Arendt and the Method of Political Thinking. Social Research, pp. 106-182. 中文參考資料： 鄂蘭漢娜. (2021). 過去與未來之間：政治思考的八場習練. 台北市: 商周出版. 鄂蘭漢娜. (2022). 極權主義的起源. 台北市: 商周出版. 葛里芬詹姆士. (2015). 論人權. 南京市: 譯林出版社.zh_TW