1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 區塊鏈技術在碳權交易機制中的應用研究
A Study on the Application of Blockchain Technology in Carbon Trading Mechanisms
作者 陳定廉
Chen, Ting-Lien
貢獻者 柯玉佳
Ke, Yu-Jia
陳定廉
Chen, Ting-Lien
關鍵詞 區塊鏈
碳權交易
Blockchain
Carbon-trading
日期 2025
上傳時間 1-Sep-2025 16:06:58 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究探討了區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中的應用，旨在分析區塊鏈技術如何通過降低交易成本、提高透明度和可信度來優化碳權交易流程。研究運用寇斯的交易成本經濟學理論，探討了區塊鏈技術在減少碳權交易中的搜索成本、談判成本、執行成本和監督成本等方面的作用。通過質性訪談，訪談了兩家在碳權交易領域具有代表性的公司，了解了它們對區塊鏈技術的態度、應用經驗和面臨的挑戰。研究發現，區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中具有顯著的優勢，如提高交易效率、增強市場透明度和可信度等，但同時也面臨技術成熟度不足、法律法規不完善、市場接受度低等挑戰。基於研究結果，本文提出了一系列建議，包括加強技術研發、完善法律法規、提高市場教育等，以促進區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中的應用和發展。
This study explores the application of block-chain technology in carbon trading, aiming to analyze how block-chain can optimize the carbon trading process by reducing transaction costs and enhancing transparency and credibility. Drawing on Coase theory of transaction cost economics, the research examines the role of block-chain technology in lowering search costs, negotiation costs, execution costs, and monitoring costs within carbon trading. Through qualitative interviews, two representative companies in the carbon trading sector were interviewed to understand their attitudes toward block-chain technology, their application experiences, and the challenges they face. The study finds that block-chain offers significant advantages in carbon trading, such as improving transaction efficiency and enhancing market transparency and credibility. However, it also faces challenges including immature technology, incomplete legal and regulatory frameworks, and low market acceptance. Based on the findings, this paper proposes a series of recommendations, including strengthening technological development, improving legal and regulatory systems, and enhancing market education to promote the application and development of block-chain technology in carbon trading.
參考文獻 BCG. (2023). The start of CBAM: A major landmark for global trade and carbon accounting. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/how-cbam-will-reshape-the-global-tradin g-system Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I., Tromer, E., & Virza, M. (2014). Zerocash: Decentralized anonymous payments from Bitcoin. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 459–474. Bitcoin. (2009). Bitcoin. https://bitcoin.org Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum white paper. https://blockchainlab.com/pdf/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_ contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x Conti, M., Kumar, S., Lal, C., & Ruj, S. (2018). A survey on security and privacy issues of blockchain technology. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1–28. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 Ellerman, A. D. (2010). Pricing carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329210373072 European Commission. (2005). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/34693/344802/Commission-recommenda tion-COM-2005 Gold Standard. (2019). Market report 2019. https://empresaclima.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3_market_report_2019_hd _compressed.pdf Gold Standard. (2021). Blockchain for better: Untangling tokenisation and carbon markets. https://www.goldstandard.org/news/blockchain-for-better-untangling-tokenisation -and-carbon-markets Gold Standard. (2024). Blockchain for better: Untangling tokenisation and carbon markets. https://www.goldstandard.org/news/blockchain-for-better-untangling-tokenisation -and-carbon-markets Hamrick, K., & Gallant, M. (2017). Unlocking potential: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2017. Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace. https://forest-trends.org//wp-content/uploads/2017/07/doc_5591.pdf ICAP.（2019）Emissions Trading Worldwide: ICAP Status Report 2019. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/emissions-trading-worldwide-icap-s tatus-report-2019 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. McKinsey & Company. (2023). What is blockchain? McKinsey Explainers. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-blockc hain Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf Narassimhan, E., Gallagher, K. S., Koester, S., & Alejo, J. R. (2018). Carbon pricing in practice: A review of existing emissions trading systems. Climate Policy, 18(8), 967–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827 Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies. Princeton University Press. https://www.lopp.net/pdf/princeton_bitcoin_book.pdf Narayanan, A., & Clark, J. (2017). Bitcoin’s academic pedigree: The concept of cryptocurrencies is built from forgotten ideas in research literature. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3134434.3136559 Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP. (2025). Tokenized carbon credits: How blockchain is revolutionizing carbon markets. https://www.osler.com/en/insights/updates/tokenized-carbon-credits-blockchain-r evolutionizing-markets/ Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book2 32962 PwC. (2024). Carbon credit tokenisation. https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/publications/documents/2024/carbon-credit-tokenis ation.pdf Sahay, A., Hughes, S., & Henretig, J. (2022, November 11). Beyond the buzz: What can blockchain do for carbon markets? RMI. https://rmi.org/beyond-the-buzz-what-can-blockchain-do-for-carbon-markets/ Schneider, L., Broekhoff, D., Füssler, J., La Hoz Theuer, S., & Kohli, A. (2019). Expert report Derik Broekhoff. https://www.clientearth.org/media/exyfip2p/productie-4-broekhoff-expert-report- v2-2-final.pdf Schueffel, P., Groeneweg, N., & Baldegger, R. (2019). The crypto encyclopedia: Coins, tokens and digital assets from A to Z. https://www.heg-fr.ch/media/lbdfnyd1/schueffelgroenewegbaldegger2019_crypto -encyclopedia_eng.pdf Stavins, R. N. (1995). Transaction costs and tradeable permits. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/stavins/files/transaction_costs_jeem.pdf Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2017). Blockchain revolution. https://itig-iraq.iq/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Blockchain_Revolution.pdf United Nations. (1998). Kyoto Protocol. UN Treaty Database. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf UNFCCC. (2015). What is the Paris Agreement? https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement Verra. (2020). Verified Carbon Standard. https://verra.org/programs/verified-carbon-standard/ Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496220 Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496720 World Bank. (2020). The World Development Report (WDR) 2020. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/9dd9e6f69baba13ef40ce5076ad6a418-0330 322021/original/EDS25-Annual-Report-October-2020.pdf World Bank. (2023). Annual Report 2023. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/e0f016c369ef94f87dec9bcb22a80dc7-0330 212023/original/Annual-Report-2023.pdf Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book2501 50 Zhang, G., Chen, S. C.-I., & Yue, X. (2023). Blockchain technology in carbon trading markets: Impacts, benefits, and challenges—A case study of the Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange . https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3296 Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data, 557–564. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318131748_An_Overview_of_Blockch ain_Technology_Architecture_Consensus_and_Future_Trends 宜睿智慧。民113年10月22日，取自https://blog.edenred.com.tw/carbon-right 綠色和平。民113年10月7日，取自https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/30747/%E7%A2%B3%E6%AC%8A%E3%80%81%E7%A2%B3%E8%B2%BB%E3%80%81%E7%A2%B3%E7%A8%85%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC%EF%BC%9F%E7%A2%B3%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E9%81%8B%E4%BD%9C%EF%BC%9F/ 經濟部台灣會展產業發展計畫。民114年4月11日，取自https://mice.meettaiwan.com/meettaiwan/netzero/%E7%A2%B3%E6%8E%92%E6%94%BE%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93-2/ 永續智庫CSRone。【碳權系列26】本土碳權交易全解析：手續費如何計算？。民113年8月15日，取自https://csrone.com/topics/8625 臺灣碳權交易所。碳權交易簡介。民113年10月17日，取自https://www.twse.com.tw/staticFiles/news/event/8a8216d69236c2e301929db7d50201a9.pdf 許惠珠（2003）。交易成本理論之回顧與前瞻。《中華技術學院學報》，28，1–16。http://aca.cust.edu.tw/pub/journal/28/28-8.pdf 家族辦公室Familiarize Docs. (2024). 交易成本經濟學定義、範例與趨勢。取自 https://docs.familiarize.com/zht/glossary/transaction-cost-economics/ 邱祈榮，許庭瑋。（2022）。區塊鏈於碳交易制度之應用。《中華林學季刊》，55(1)，1–18。https://www.aat.org.tw/File/Web13/File/867.pdf 臺灣碳權交易所。（2024）。https://www.tcx.com.tw/zh/ 工研院 (2021)。區塊鏈簡介與技術探討。民110年8月20日https://college.itri.org.tw/Home/InfoData/f6e19f2d-f81c-421c-bc36-ea6409ba0a5d/71910c07-d3f9-4235-a3a9-d7006b6456ea
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
112364115
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112364115
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 柯玉佳zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Ke, Yu-Jiaen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳定廉zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Ting-Lienen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳定廉zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Ting-Lienen_US
dc.date (日期) 2025en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Sep-2025 16:06:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Sep-2025 16:06:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Sep-2025 16:06:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0112364115en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159251-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 科技管理與智慧財產研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 112364115zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究探討了區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中的應用，旨在分析區塊鏈技術如何通過降低交易成本、提高透明度和可信度來優化碳權交易流程。研究運用寇斯的交易成本經濟學理論，探討了區塊鏈技術在減少碳權交易中的搜索成本、談判成本、執行成本和監督成本等方面的作用。通過質性訪談，訪談了兩家在碳權交易領域具有代表性的公司，了解了它們對區塊鏈技術的態度、應用經驗和面臨的挑戰。研究發現，區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中具有顯著的優勢，如提高交易效率、增強市場透明度和可信度等，但同時也面臨技術成熟度不足、法律法規不完善、市場接受度低等挑戰。基於研究結果，本文提出了一系列建議，包括加強技術研發、完善法律法規、提高市場教育等，以促進區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中的應用和發展。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study explores the application of block-chain technology in carbon trading, aiming to analyze how block-chain can optimize the carbon trading process by reducing transaction costs and enhancing transparency and credibility. Drawing on Coase theory of transaction cost economics, the research examines the role of block-chain technology in lowering search costs, negotiation costs, execution costs, and monitoring costs within carbon trading. Through qualitative interviews, two representative companies in the carbon trading sector were interviewed to understand their attitudes toward block-chain technology, their application experiences, and the challenges they face. The study finds that block-chain offers significant advantages in carbon trading, such as improving transaction efficiency and enhancing market transparency and credibility. However, it also faces challenges including immature technology, incomplete legal and regulatory frameworks, and low market acceptance. Based on the findings, this paper proposes a series of recommendations, including strengthening technological development, improving legal and regulatory systems, and enhancing market education to promote the application and development of block-chain technology in carbon trading.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 10 第一節 研究背景 10 第二節 研究動機 10 第三節 研究目的與問題 12 第二章 文獻回顧 14 第一節 碳權交易的歷史與發展 14 一、碳權的產出、認證與交易流程 14 二、碳權的產出 15 三、碳權的認證 16 四、碳權的交易流程 16 第二節 碳權交易面臨的瓶頸與痛點 18 一、碳權交易的資訊不透明問題 18 二、碳權的「重複計算」風險 18 三、高交易成本與低效率問題 19 第三節 區塊鏈技術介紹 20 一、透明度的基礎：開放帳本與公開驗證機制 22 二、完整性保障：單向雜湊與區塊鏈結構 22 三、認證性實現：非對稱加密與數位簽章 23 四、透明與保密的平衡：進階加密技術應用 24 五、小結 24 第四節 區塊鏈技術於碳權應用的趨勢 26 一、探討區塊鏈透明度特性在碳權交易中的技術基礎 26 二、文獻批判與局限性討論 27 第五節 交易成本理論 28 一、理論核心 28 二、寇斯定理的應用與限制 29 三、各項成本 29 第六節 小結 33 第三章 研究方法 35 第一節 專家訪談的目的與重要性 35 一、專家選擇標準與範圍 35 第二節 訪談設計與流程 36 一、半結構式訪談定義與特性 37 二、設計原則 37 三、訪談流程 37 四、訪談訪法優點 38 五、挑戰與注意事項 38 第三節 研究架構 39 第四節 個案選擇 41 一、臺灣圖靈鏈公司（代號：T Chain Co.） 41 二、臺灣現代財富科技公司（代號：Mai Coin Co.） 42 三、資料蒐集方法 43 四、問題設計原則 44 五、資料分析 44 第四章 研究分析 46 第一節 Mai Coin個案分析 46 一、公司背景與產業定位 46 二、區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中的應用現況 47 三、交易成本視角分析 47 四、面臨的挑戰與未來展望 50 第二節 圖靈鏈個案研究分析 54 一、公司背景與產業定位 54 二、區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中的應用現況 54 三、交易成本視角分析 56 四、面臨的挑戰與未來展望 59 第三節 區塊鏈技術導入下的交易成本分析 60 第四節 創新模式構想：新一代碳權認證機制 64 第五節 小結 64 第五章 研究結論 66 第一節 回應研究問題 66 第二節 理論意涵 66 第三節 實務意涵 68 第四節 研究限制 68 第五節 未來研究建議 69 參考文獻 71 英文文獻 71 中文文獻 75 附錄 77 附錄一 訪談大綱 77zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1098508 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112364115en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 區塊鏈zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 碳權交易zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Blockchainen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Carbon-tradingen_US
dc.title (題名) 區塊鏈技術在碳權交易機制中的應用研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study on the Application of Blockchain Technology in Carbon Trading Mechanismsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) BCG. (2023). The start of CBAM: A major landmark for global trade and carbon accounting. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/how-cbam-will-reshape-the-global-tradin g-system Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I., Tromer, E., & Virza, M. (2014). Zerocash: Decentralized anonymous payments from Bitcoin. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 459–474. Bitcoin. (2009). Bitcoin. https://bitcoin.org Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum white paper. https://blockchainlab.com/pdf/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_ contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x Conti, M., Kumar, S., Lal, C., & Ruj, S. (2018). A survey on security and privacy issues of blockchain technology. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1–28. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 Ellerman, A. D. (2010). Pricing carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329210373072 European Commission. (2005). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/34693/344802/Commission-recommenda tion-COM-2005 Gold Standard. (2019). Market report 2019. https://empresaclima.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3_market_report_2019_hd _compressed.pdf Gold Standard. (2021). Blockchain for better: Untangling tokenisation and carbon markets. https://www.goldstandard.org/news/blockchain-for-better-untangling-tokenisation -and-carbon-markets Gold Standard. (2024). Blockchain for better: Untangling tokenisation and carbon markets. https://www.goldstandard.org/news/blockchain-for-better-untangling-tokenisation -and-carbon-markets Hamrick, K., & Gallant, M. (2017). Unlocking potential: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2017. Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace. https://forest-trends.org//wp-content/uploads/2017/07/doc_5591.pdf ICAP.（2019）Emissions Trading Worldwide: ICAP Status Report 2019. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/emissions-trading-worldwide-icap-s tatus-report-2019 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. McKinsey & Company. (2023). What is blockchain? McKinsey Explainers. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-blockc hain Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf Narassimhan, E., Gallagher, K. S., Koester, S., & Alejo, J. R. (2018). Carbon pricing in practice: A review of existing emissions trading systems. Climate Policy, 18(8), 967–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827 Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies. Princeton University Press. https://www.lopp.net/pdf/princeton_bitcoin_book.pdf Narayanan, A., & Clark, J. (2017). Bitcoin’s academic pedigree: The concept of cryptocurrencies is built from forgotten ideas in research literature. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3134434.3136559 Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP. (2025). Tokenized carbon credits: How blockchain is revolutionizing carbon markets. https://www.osler.com/en/insights/updates/tokenized-carbon-credits-blockchain-r evolutionizing-markets/ Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book2 32962 PwC. (2024). Carbon credit tokenisation. https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/publications/documents/2024/carbon-credit-tokenis ation.pdf Sahay, A., Hughes, S., & Henretig, J. (2022, November 11). Beyond the buzz: What can blockchain do for carbon markets? RMI. https://rmi.org/beyond-the-buzz-what-can-blockchain-do-for-carbon-markets/ Schneider, L., Broekhoff, D., Füssler, J., La Hoz Theuer, S., & Kohli, A. (2019). Expert report Derik Broekhoff. https://www.clientearth.org/media/exyfip2p/productie-4-broekhoff-expert-report- v2-2-final.pdf Schueffel, P., Groeneweg, N., & Baldegger, R. (2019). The crypto encyclopedia: Coins, tokens and digital assets from A to Z. https://www.heg-fr.ch/media/lbdfnyd1/schueffelgroenewegbaldegger2019_crypto -encyclopedia_eng.pdf Stavins, R. N. (1995). Transaction costs and tradeable permits. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/stavins/files/transaction_costs_jeem.pdf Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2017). Blockchain revolution. https://itig-iraq.iq/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Blockchain_Revolution.pdf United Nations. (1998). Kyoto Protocol. UN Treaty Database. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf UNFCCC. (2015). What is the Paris Agreement? https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement Verra. (2020). Verified Carbon Standard. https://verra.org/programs/verified-carbon-standard/ Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496220 Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496720 World Bank. (2020). The World Development Report (WDR) 2020. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/9dd9e6f69baba13ef40ce5076ad6a418-0330 322021/original/EDS25-Annual-Report-October-2020.pdf World Bank. (2023). Annual Report 2023. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/e0f016c369ef94f87dec9bcb22a80dc7-0330 212023/original/Annual-Report-2023.pdf Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book2501 50 Zhang, G., Chen, S. C.-I., & Yue, X. (2023). Blockchain technology in carbon trading markets: Impacts, benefits, and challenges—A case study of the Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange . https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3296 Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data, 557–564. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318131748_An_Overview_of_Blockch ain_Technology_Architecture_Consensus_and_Future_Trends 宜睿智慧。民113年10月22日，取自https://blog.edenred.com.tw/carbon-right 綠色和平。民113年10月7日，取自https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/30747/%E7%A2%B3%E6%AC%8A%E3%80%81%E7%A2%B3%E8%B2%BB%E3%80%81%E7%A2%B3%E7%A8%85%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC%EF%BC%9F%E7%A2%B3%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E9%81%8B%E4%BD%9C%EF%BC%9F/ 經濟部台灣會展產業發展計畫。民114年4月11日，取自https://mice.meettaiwan.com/meettaiwan/netzero/%E7%A2%B3%E6%8E%92%E6%94%BE%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93-2/ 永續智庫CSRone。【碳權系列26】本土碳權交易全解析：手續費如何計算？。民113年8月15日，取自https://csrone.com/topics/8625 臺灣碳權交易所。碳權交易簡介。民113年10月17日，取自https://www.twse.com.tw/staticFiles/news/event/8a8216d69236c2e301929db7d50201a9.pdf 許惠珠（2003）。交易成本理論之回顧與前瞻。《中華技術學院學報》，28，1–16。http://aca.cust.edu.tw/pub/journal/28/28-8.pdf 家族辦公室Familiarize Docs. (2024). 交易成本經濟學定義、範例與趨勢。取自 https://docs.familiarize.com/zht/glossary/transaction-cost-economics/ 邱祈榮，許庭瑋。（2022）。區塊鏈於碳交易制度之應用。《中華林學季刊》，55(1)，1–18。https://www.aat.org.tw/File/Web13/File/867.pdf 臺灣碳權交易所。（2024）。https://www.tcx.com.tw/zh/ 工研院 (2021)。區塊鏈簡介與技術探討。民110年8月20日https://college.itri.org.tw/Home/InfoData/f6e19f2d-f81c-421c-bc36-ea6409ba0a5d/71910c07-d3f9-4235-a3a9-d7006b6456eazh_TW