| dc.contributor | 法學院 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 黃士軒 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2025-06 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 24-Sep-2025 09:30:02 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 24-Sep-2025 09:30:02 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 24-Sep-2025 09:30:02 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159595 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文是關於跟蹤騷擾行為罪（簡稱跟騷罪）處罰現況為主題的研究論文。本文內容主要有以下幾個部分：第一部分是就跟蹤騷擾防制法實施前後，關於跟騷罪的主要解釋論上問題，觀察掌握我國學說上各說紛陳的現況。第二部分，則是以跟騷罪實施後約2年期間內之我國實務事例為對象，並根據不同人際關係加以分類並觀察。第三部分，則分析我國跟騷罪處罰現況下，存在有（1）處罰範圍不安定；以及（2）過度擴張處罰的危險，並指出這樣的危險的根源在於實務傾向將被害人主觀上「安心感」作為判斷構造核心的緣故。第四部分，則是為避免上述危險，建議在解釋論上以「生命、身體危險驟升防止說」為基本立場，並以類型化（1）應直接成立跟騷罪的情形，以及（2）尚不直接成立跟騷罪但可透過「告誡書保護令違反保護令罪」的方式使警察先介入再以刑法處罰的情形。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This article is a research paper on the status of punishment for the crime of stalking in Taiwan. The content of this article mainly consists of the following parts: The first part is about the main interpretive arguments regarding the crime of stalking before and after the implementation of the Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act, and observes and grasps the current situation of different theories in Taiwan. The second part focuses on cases in judicial practice in Taiwan within about 2 years after the crime of stalking was committed, and classifies and observes the cases according to different interpersonal relationships. The third part analyzes the current situation of punishment for the crime of stalking in Taiwan, and points out the problems concerning the crime of stalking are (1) unstable scope of punishment; and (2) the danger of over-expansion of punishment. It points out that the reason which causes such danger lies in the tendency to see the victims feeling of safety as the core of the judgment structure. The fourth part points out that to avoid the dangers mentioned above, it is recommended to take the theoretical standpoint of viewing "prevention of sudden increase in danger to life and body" as the core of the offense of stalking. And it is necessary to classify (1) the situations that should directly establish the crime of stalking, and (2) The crime of stalking has not yet been directly established, but the police can intervene first and then be punished with penalty through the approach of "warning letter protection order→crime of violation of protection order". | |
| dc.format.extent | 130 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 中原財經法學, No.54, pp.43-130 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 跟蹤騷擾; 安心感; 生命身體之危險; 與性或性別有關; 反覆或持續 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Stalking; Feeling of security; Danger to life or body; Sexual or gender-related; Repeatedly or continue | |
| dc.title (題名) | 檢視我國跟蹤騷擾行為罪的處罰現況 | |
| dc.title (題名) | Review the Status of Punishment for the Offense of Stalking in Taiwan | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
