Publications-Periodical Articles
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 Examining the connection between position-based power and social status across 70 cultures 作者 孫蒨如
Sun, Chien-Ru;al, et貢獻者 心理系 關鍵詞 culture; other-orientation; power; self-orientation; social status 日期 2025-04 上傳時間 13-Nov-2025 10:58:58 (UTC+8) 摘要 Even in the most egalitarian societies, hierarchies of power and status shape social life. However, power and received status are not synonymous—individuals in positions of power may or may not be accorded the respect corresponding to their role. Using a cooperatively collected dataset from 18,096 participants across 70 cultures, we investigate, through a survey-based correlational design, when perceived position-based power (operationalized as influence and control) of various powerholders is associated with their elevated social status (operationalized as perceived respect and instrumental social value). We document that the positive link between power and status characterizes most cultural regions, except for WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and Post-Soviet regions. The strength of this association depends on individual and cultural factors. First, the perceived other-orientation of powerholders amplifies the positive link between perceived power and status. The perceived self-orientation of powerholders weakens this relationship. Second, among cultures characterized by low Self-Expression versus Harmony (e.g., South Korea, Taiwan), high Embeddedness (e.g., Senegal), and high Cultural Tightness (e.g., Malaysia), the association between power and status tends to be particularly strong. The results underline the importance of both individual perceptions and societal values in how position-based power relates to social status. 關聯 British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.64, No.2, e12871 資料類型 article DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12871 dc.contributor 心理系 dc.creator (作者) 孫蒨如 dc.creator (作者) Sun, Chien-Ru;al, et dc.date (日期) 2025-04 dc.date.accessioned 13-Nov-2025 10:58:58 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 13-Nov-2025 10:58:58 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 13-Nov-2025 10:58:58 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=179750 - dc.description.abstract (摘要) Even in the most egalitarian societies, hierarchies of power and status shape social life. However, power and received status are not synonymous—individuals in positions of power may or may not be accorded the respect corresponding to their role. Using a cooperatively collected dataset from 18,096 participants across 70 cultures, we investigate, through a survey-based correlational design, when perceived position-based power (operationalized as influence and control) of various powerholders is associated with their elevated social status (operationalized as perceived respect and instrumental social value). We document that the positive link between power and status characterizes most cultural regions, except for WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and Post-Soviet regions. The strength of this association depends on individual and cultural factors. First, the perceived other-orientation of powerholders amplifies the positive link between perceived power and status. The perceived self-orientation of powerholders weakens this relationship. Second, among cultures characterized by low Self-Expression versus Harmony (e.g., South Korea, Taiwan), high Embeddedness (e.g., Senegal), and high Cultural Tightness (e.g., Malaysia), the association between power and status tends to be particularly strong. The results underline the importance of both individual perceptions and societal values in how position-based power relates to social status. dc.format.extent 98 bytes - dc.format.mimetype text/html - dc.relation (關聯) British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.64, No.2, e12871 dc.subject (關鍵詞) culture; other-orientation; power; self-orientation; social status dc.title (題名) Examining the connection between position-based power and social status across 70 cultures dc.type (資料類型) article dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1111/bjso.12871 dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12871
